COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .
RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
[Ed.:
Several states are planning to use “standing orders” to kill in hospitals. SASHA LATYPOVA
Most states have similar laws on the books. Yes, Florida, too.
SEP 10, 2025
I wanted to bring to your attention this post by Conservative Ladies of WA: “West Coast Alliance and WA’s Vaccine Mandate: A Coordinated Power Shift”.
It is important to share this widely and discuss with your family and friends. This is especially critical if you live in CA, OR, WA, HI but most states already have the enabling laws on the books. The authors write that in just six months (2025), Washington State has constructed a legal and operational framework that enables mass vaccination…and in some cases without parental consent, without local oversight, and without public debate. The pieces are already in place. The system is live. And most families have no idea:
- Feb 21, 2025: ESHB 1531 introduced
- Mar 8, 2025: Passed by the House (58–35)
- Apr 10, 2025: Passed by the Senate (31–18: Republican Senator Paul Harris joining democrats voting yes)
- Apr 21, 2025: Signed into law by Governor Ferguson with emergency clause, making it take effect immediately
- Sep 3, 2025: West Coast Health Alliance announced
- Sep 4, 2025: COVID-19 Vaccine Standing Order issued (Hawaii became the 4th state to join the Alliance)
This timeline reveals a coordinated and rapid policy shift. ESHB 1531 was introduced and passed in under two months, with minimal public scrutiny. The law was signed just days before the legislative session ended, and within months, Washington joined a regional health alliance with California and Oregon. The very next day, the Washington State Department of Health issued a standing order authorizing COVID-19 vaccination for all individuals aged six months and older. The speed and sequencing of these actions suggest strategic alignment—not coincidence.
Standing orders are not the only tools of health tyranny, lies and deception. Both NY and NJ issued directives for pharmacists and doctors to inject covid shots “off label”, declaring statewide emergencies (and using state level PREP Act-like laws that they already have:
I asked Katherine Watt about standing orders several weeks ago, and here are her comments:
Adding one comment – one of the things I found but haven’t written about is the promotion and use of “standing orders” for vaccination. Without going into a lot of detail, they’re used at the medical practice level and at the state and local health department level, to absolve individual practitioners of their individual ethical obligations to individual patients. I think of them as a kind of non-specific prescription, whereby the act of vaccination is performed as if prescribed for an individual patient, but without any ethical or legal obligation for the vaccinator to know anything specific about the vaccine or anything specific about the recipient’s body and how his or her body may respond to the unknown contents of the vaccine vial.
I think PREP Act declarations function as a form of nationwide standing order, specifically the sections about “covered persons.”
One document on this subject is a DoD information paper from March 2022
“a. In the United States, federal law prohibits dispensing human vaccines or immune globulins without a prescription of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21USC 353, 21CFR 610.60[a] [6]).
b. Standing Order programs authorize the administration of immunizations based on approved protocols without the need for a written physician order or referral from a primary care provider.
c. Standing Orders are written protocols that delineate the circumstances under which appropriately trained healthcare personnel, other than a privileged provider, can engage in the legal practice of medicine. Standing Orders describe the specific type of medical practice that will be delegated, delineate the procedures that personnel must follow, identify the patient population that may be served, specify the level of provider supervision required, and govern the locations where the services may occur.
d. Standing Orders are intended to remove administrative barriers to immunizations that are routinely administered in low-risk settings. They are recommended for use by properly trained health care personnel working within their scope of practice as determined by their license…”
Here’s an example of a state-level standing order authorizing pharmacists to administer Pfizer-BioNTech products, from New York:
https://health.ny.gov/prevention/immunization/providers/docs/so_pfizer_5_years_and_older.pdf
And here’s a 2021 model standing order provided by CDC:
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/111991
I have stated this many times, but it’s worth repeating – avoid “healthcare” encounters at all cost, especially going to the hospital. Only seek healthcare if it is a serious problem or an emergency. If you have to go to the hospital, have a patient advocate with you (this may or may not protect you from the state’s “standing orders”, however anyone who can fight on your behalf or make abuses known publicly is a deterrent). Do not take your children to the doctors who push vaccines. Find alternatives.
Related articles about the insane unconstitutional quarantine powers that CDC bestowed on themselves long ago:
When “pandemics are declared” – what does this mean in practice? SASHA LATYPOVA MAY 3, 2024 Read full story
Grand Princess Quarantine Orders FOIA, Part 2 SASHA LATYPOVA AUGUST 19, 2024 Read full story
Buried Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day THE VIGILANT FOX
After five years of suppression, the results are here.
SEP 09, 2025
In 2020, Dr. Marcus Zervos agreed to the unthinkable: test the vaccinated against the unvaccinated.
Convinced it would prove vaccines safe, he vowed to publish the results no matter what.
Those results never saw the light of day—until now.
Here’s what the buried study revealed.
Meet Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. He’s as pro-vaccine as they come.
In 2020, he crossed paths with health freedom journalist Del Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed to run the study, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”
The study was a retrospective vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparative study, examining the long-term health outcomes of 18,468 subjects.
It was titled “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study.”
Here’s what the results revealed:
Vaccinated children were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis than the unvaccinated.
They also had a sixfold increase in acute and chronic ear infections.
Speech disorders were 4.47 times higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated.
Meanwhile, the unvaccinated cohort showed zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
“This is devastating.”
Attorney Aaron Siri of ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) notes that this study should have been “rushed to publication on an emergency basis.”
But that didn’t happen.
Why? Because publishing this would have ruined Zervos’ career.
As Siri testified at a Senate vaccine hearing on Tuesday, the overall findings showed that “after 10 years, 17% of unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of vaccinated children had at least one.”
That’s a more than threefold increase in the risk of chronic health conditions among the vaccinated.
Huge credit goes to Del Bigtree, The Highwire, Attorney Aaron Siri, and others for 1) convincing Dr. Zervos to conduct this study and 2) bringing it to light.
The full documentary, titled An Inconvenient Study, is slated for release on October 3.
Pfizer Knew: mRNA Nanoparticles Attack Baby Boys’ Testes, Damaging Masculinity and Fertility for Generations Baxter Dmitry
September 8, 2025 – Leaked internal Pfizer documents have revealed a disturbing truth: the vaccine’s greatest impact may not be on the lungs, but on the future of human reproduction.
Instead of primarily targeting the respiratory system, the data shows an obsessive focus on the organs of fertility—particularly those that define masculinity itself.
The lipid nanoparticles were engineered to cross every membrane of the human body—including the blood-brain barrier, the ovaries, and even the placenta. Once inside, they leave behind calcifications that prevent developing babies from receiving vital nutrients and oxygen.
The fallout has been catastrophic: midwives now report placentas disintegrating in their hands, unprecedented levels of premature births, waves of maternal hemorrhaging, and a chilling 40% rise in maternal mortality rates across the Western world.
Most alarming of all is the impact on unborn boys. Pfizer’s own data shows the nanoparticles invade the testes in utero, degrading the Leydig cells responsible for testosterone production and the development of masculinity itself.
This means that even boys who were never injected could face permanent damage—robbed of normal male development before they even draw their first breath.
The crisis doesn’t stop there. An andrology report confirmed that the vaccines dramatically reduce sperm motility in grown men, crippling their reproductive capacity.
Pfizer’s own trial documents contained a stunning warning: male participants were told not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women—or, if they did, to use two forms of contraception. The company even defined “exposure” as occurring through semen, skin contact, or even breath.
The pregnancy data is equally damning. Of the 270 pregnancies tracked during the trials, records for 234 mysteriously vanished. But of the remaining 36 pregnancies, more than 80% ended in the death of the baby.
The evidence paints a disturbing picture. Pfizer knew. They had data showing devastating impacts on fertility, pregnancy outcomes, and male development. Yet the shots were rolled out anyway—promoted as a miracle cure while hiding a darker agenda.
The question is unavoidable: why was human reproduction the overwhelming focus of Pfizer’s internal research?
And in a world already facing a fertility crisis and population collapse, is it a coincidence that masculinity and fertility are under siege on every front?
[Ed.: Oh balls, just when I thought it couldn’t get much worse…]
The MAHA Report ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS
(copied from the White House Website)
SEP 09, 2025 – On February 13, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14212 titled “Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission” (EO).
The EO directed the Make American Healthy Again Commission to submit to the President, through the Chair and Executive Director, the Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment, which was released on May 22nd. The EO further requires submission of a Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy to the President that is based on the findings of the assessment and that “shall address appropriately restructuring the Federal Government’s response to the childhood chronic disease crisis, including by ending Federal practices that exacerbate the health crisis or unsuccessfully attempt to address it, and by adding powerful new solutions that will end childhood chronic disease.”
The assessment identified four potential drivers behind the rise in childhood chronic disease that present the clearest opportunities for progress:
Poor Diet: The American diet has shifted dramatically toward highly processed foods, leading to nutrient depletion, increased caloric intake, and exposure to potentially harmful or unhealthy additives. Over 60% of children’s calories now come from highly processed foods, contributing to obesity, diabetes, and other chronic conditions.
Chemical Exposure: Children are exposed to an increasing number of synthetic chemicals, some of which have been linked to developmental issues and chronic disease. The current regulatory framework should be continually evaluated to ensure that chemicals and other exposures do not interact together to pose a threat to the health of our children.
Lack of Physical Activity and Chronic Stress: American children are experiencing unprecedented levels of inactivity, screen use, sleep deprivation, and chronic stress. These factors significantly contribute to the rise in chronic diseases and mental health challenges.
Overmedicalization: There is a concerning trend of overprescribing medications to children, often driven by conflicts of interest in medical research, regulation, and practice. This has led to unnecessary treatments and long-term health risks.
NIH MAHA Chronic Disease Initiative
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will launch an Initiative on Chronic Disease to leverage and align existing NIH research projects, improve NIH coordination on chronic disease research, and generate actionable results for diseases arising in childhood and adulthood.
- The NIH will launch a new Whole-Person-Health approach to chronic disease prevention research and leverage collective expertise across the agency to catalyze transformative discovery science and intervention strategies that promote wellness, resilience, and optimal health, including metabolic health, at all stages of life.
Real World Data Platform (RWDP)
The NIH will link multiple datasets, such as claims information, electronic health records, and wearables data, into a single integrated dataset for researchers studying the causes of, and developing treatments for, the chronic disease crisis. The RWDP will eliminate redundancies from data collection, linkage, and compute infrastructures (including artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning and high-throughput analytics) while maintaining rigorous privacy protections and consent protections. It will also dramatically reduce administrative overhead by relying on a unified set of data use and governance agreements.
New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)
The expanded use of NAMs can enable earlier, more predictive insights into chronic disease mechanisms using human-relevant models such as organoids, computational simulations, and real-world data integration. This improves prevention, diagnosis, and personalized treatment strategies while reducing reliance on animal studies that often fail to replicate complex human conditions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and NIH have all committed to using NAMs moving forward, when appropriate.
Cumulative Exposure
The EPA, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and NIH will develop a research and evaluation framework for cumulative exposure across chemical classes. This research will focus on using and developing NAMs, including advancing the use of computational tools. Additional EPA research will focus on using NAMs to improve methods for evaluating human health and environmental risks of chemical contaminants. Consistent with statutory obligations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Food Quality Protection Act, EPA will focus on pesticides acting through a common mode of action.
Autism
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through NIH and in collaboration with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), will study the root causes of autism, including through the RWDP.
Vaccine Injury
HHS, in collaboration with NIH, will investigate vaccine injuries with improved data collection and analysis, including through a new vaccine injury research program at the NIH Clinical Center that may expand to centers around the country.
Water Quality
The EPA and USDA, along with other relevant Federal partners and in collaboration with NIH, will assess ongoing evaluations of water contaminants and update guidance and prioritizations of certain contaminants appropriately. For example, EPA will review new scientific information on the potential health risks of fluoride in drinking water to inform Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Additionally, USDA, through its Research, Education, and Economics mission area, in consultation with the Farm Production and Conservation mission area, will continue research on ways to improve water quality and adoption of applicable conservation practices. Agency research could also include research to inform the understanding of levels of pharmaceuticals in our water supply that could be adversely affecting animal and human health.
Air Quality
The EPA and NIH will study air quality impacts on children’s health and utilize existing research programs to improve data collection and analysis.
Microplastics and Synthetics
HHS, in collaboration with NIH and EPA, will complete an evaluation of the risks and exposures of microplastics and synthetics, including in common products such as textiles.
Prescribing Patterns and Impact on Mental Health
HHS (inclusive of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, FDA, NIH, and CMS) will form a mental health diagnosis and prescription working group to evaluate prescription patterns for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, and other relevant drugs for children. HHS will also evaluate the therapeutic harms and benefits of current diagnostic thresholds, overprescription trends, and evidence-based solutions that can be scaled-up to improve mental health, including through school-based interventions, diet, and foster care services. NIH will conduct research as appropriate. FDA will update labels for older, generic drugs to better reflect the latest science.
Food for Health
The Data Prove It: Fauci Misled Trump on COVID Vaccine Efficacy in 2020 By Ron Brown, Ph.D.
Data from randomized controlled trials prove the COVID-19 vaccines failed to reach clinically significant efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, evidence suggests that in 2020, public health officials who failed to fully disclose the very low absolute efficacy of the vaccines misled President Donald Trump about the efficacy of the vaccines.
SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 TrialSite News
U.S. President Donald Trump recently demanded the release of data from pharmaceutical companies to “justify the success of their various COVID-19 drugs,” which include the COVID-19 vaccines that his administration delivered to the public in 2020 through Operation Warp Speed.
Unfortunately, data from randomized controlled trials prove the opposite of success — the COVID-19 vaccines failed to reach clinically significant efficacy against infection with the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.
Furthermore, evidence suggests that the President was misled by public health officials who failed to fully disclose the very low absolute efficacy of the vaccines.
Absolute and relative risk reductions
After the launch of Operation Warp Speed, I conducted an independent analysis of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy from data published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
My analysis, which was published in Medicina in February 2021, showed that the absolute risk reductions of the Stage 3 clinical trials for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were clinically insignificant at approximately 1%. Similar findings were verified by other researchers.
In the meantime, the public was told by public health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, that the vaccines were around 95% effective in reducing the risk of a mild to moderate COVID-19 infection. The vaccines were lauded as the most effective tool to stop the spread of the coronavirus.
Observational studies also claimed that COVID-19 antiviral drugs were effective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths.
Nevertheless, evidence of “effectiveness” from these observational studies could not control for biases and confounding factors, nor rise to the gold standard of efficacy experimentally verified through participant randomization in clinical trials.
Many months later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were not effective in stopping the spread of the coronavirus. What went wrong? Clearly, the expectations of high vaccine efficacy did not match my 2021 analysis. Who was right?
The answer is that both the public health officials and I were right, except that we each analyzed and reported different findings from the trial data. While I reported the vaccines’ absolute risk reductions, Fauci and public health officials reported the vaccines’ relative risk reductions.
Understanding the difference between these two risk measurements is crucial for correctly interpreting the efficacy of the vaccines.
Failure to communicate risks
Without getting into a complicated explanation of statistical differences between absolute and relative risk reductions (which I published here), the important point is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated in their 2011 publication, “Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User’s Guide,” that BOTH absolute and relative risk reductions should be disclosed to the public.
Obviously, this did not occur during Operation Warp Speed. Indeed, members of the FDA committee that granted emergency use authorization of the vaccines ignored the FDA’s own guidelines for communicating risks to the public and omitted reporting the absolute risk reductions.
Public health officials falsely declared the much higher relative risk reductions as the true risk reductions of the vaccines. Apparently, pressure to support the vaccines as a quick way out of the COVID-19 pandemic promoted public health policy over valid and reliable scientific data.
Had the public been aware of the low clinical efficacy of the vaccines in absolute terms, the expectations of the vaccines to stop the spread of the coronavirus would not have been overstated, and the public, including the Trump administration, would not have been misled.
After publishing my findings on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, I later analyzed data from trials of COVID-19 antivirals and found similar problems of unreported low absolute risk reductions associated with most of these drugs: “Absolute Risk Reductions in COVID-19 Antiviral Medication Clinical Trials.”
Originally published by TrialSite News.
Ron Brown, Ph.D.’s research synthesizes novel theories and insights from the latest research findings on the causes and prevention of disease.
[Ed.:
FDA Conducting ‘Intense Investigation’ of Child Deaths Following COVID Shot by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
The investigation will use data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as well as autopsy reports and interviews with families who lost a child, said Dr. Marty Makary, head of the FDA. VAERS data as of Aug. 29 show 202 deaths of children ages 17 and younger following COVID-19 vaccination, but some suspect that number is much higher.
SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 Children’s Health Defense
The FDA is conducting an “intense investigation” into the deaths of young, healthy children following COVID-19 vaccination, the agency’s commissioner confirmed in a CNN interview last week.
“We’re going to release a report in the coming few weeks,” Dr. Marty Makary, head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “We’re talking to the primary sources, the family members who lost a child … we’re reviewing the autopsy reports, we’re having physicians do the investigation,” he said.
The investigation is drawing on reports from the U.S. government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), according to Makary.
“We’ve been looking into the VAERS database, self-reports that there have been children who have died from the COVID vaccine. And so, we’re doing a proper investigation,” he said.
Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, said she was “delighted” to hear about the investigation, which she said “is many years overdue.”
Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said the investigation is “very late” and should also examine adult post-vaccination deaths, adding that administration of the COVID-19 vaccines should be halted pending the outcome of such an investigation.
He said:
“Starting with the pediatric deaths is an anemic start, as we expect that he will review all … cases and the dozens of peer-reviewed manuscripts that have analyzed these cases. Any such investigation should be done after any further vaccination is halted, so more deaths do not occur under the new FDA administration.”
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher agreed. He called the investigation “a breath of fresh air” but said it “should have been initiated a long time ago — in 2021.”
VAERS shows 202 child deaths after COVID shot — true number may be higher
VAERS data as of Aug. 29 show 202 reports of deaths among children ages 17 and younger following COVID-19 vaccination.
However, that number isn’t necessarily accurate, for several reasons.
VAERS, co-managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the FDA, is a “passive reporting system.” That means the system relies on medical professionals or people who believe they, or their child, were injured to submit a report — and that doesn’t always happen.
In fact, a 2011 Harvard report found that less than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS.
And even when an injury or death is reported, investigations have suggested that the report may not be publicly visible in the system.
A 2022 audit by React19, an organization advocating on behalf of COVID-19 vaccine injury victims and their families, found that 1 in 3 COVID-19 vaccine adverse event reports in VAERS were not posted publicly or were deleted.
And in 2023, an investigation by The BMJ revealed that the FDA and CDC maintain two separate VAERS databases — one available to the public that contains only initial reports, and a private back-end system containing updates to the original reports.
That’s significant because reports of injuries or deaths to VAERS require verification before they can be confirmed as vaccine-related injuries or deaths — but that information can only be found in the updated reports.
Adding to the difficulty in estimating deaths and injuries among children is that if the person who reports the injury neglects to fill in the age field, it’s impossible to do an accurate search of injuries or deaths by age.
According to analyst Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSAware.com, the summaries that accompany the reports often contain the victim’s age, but this information won’t appear when searching for reports by age in VAERS if the age field in the report is empty.
“This is clearly where most dead children are hiding in VAERS,” said analyst Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSAware.com. Benavides said the summaries of reports with an “unknown” age listed show “three times the amount of dead children ‘hiding’ in VAERS” compared to the official figure.
As of Aug. 29, VAERS contains 13,457 reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccination that list an “unknown” age, and 73,176 COVID-19 vaccine injury reports involving people under 18.
CDC officials who resigned gave FDA a ‘hard time’ over investigation
According to Makary, the CDC stonewalled the FDA’s investigation, contributing to uncertainty surrounding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines.
He said:
“Since we came into office, early on in the first few months, we got blocked and we were given different excuses and told to wait and ‘we can’t do it.’ It was those individuals who resigned from the CDC, that were in leadership, that gave us the hard time about getting the data.”
Holland said it was “horrifying to think that CDC officials in the past impeded investigation into child deaths from federally recommended medical interventions.”
During a U.S. Senate hearing last week, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that while COVID-19 vaccines have “saved lives” according to some and also caused deaths, the numbers for both categories are unclear due to “data chaos coming out of the CDC.”
On Aug. 27, the White House confirmed the firing of CDC Director Susan Monarez, after she refused to resign amid clashes with Kennedy.
In recent months, several CDC officials and scientists involved with the agency’s vaccine policy have resigned, including former CDC vaccine chief Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, pediatric infectious disease expert Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, and senior CDC scientist Dr. Fiona Havers.
In an interview Sunday on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” Kennedy said Daskalakis withheld critical vaccine safety data.
“For seven months, he stonewalled us so we could not get that data,” Kennedy said.
Last week, President Donald Trump suggested that the CDC and Big Pharma have not been fully forthcoming about COVID-19 vaccine safety data. Trump demanded they “clear up this mess.”
According to The Epoch Times, the U.S. has not released an official number of deaths confirmed to be related to COVID-19 vaccination.
Health workers shunning COVID shots ‘tells you what the real consensus is’
News of the FDA’s investigation comes days after Kennedy announced that the FDA ended emergency use authorization of the COVID-19 vaccines, restricting the shots to people at higher risk for severe illness.
However, the vaccines will continue to be available to everyone, in consultation with their physicians, pending new recommendations for the forthcoming cold and flu season by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
The committee is scheduled to meet Sept. 18 to vote on the new recommendations.
Makary questioned the necessity of COVID-19 vaccination for healthy people.
“People are appropriately asking today, ‘if I’m healthy, do I need to take another booster shot?’” Makary said, noting that most healthcare workers did not receive a COVID-19 booster during the previous cold and flu season.
“Eighty-five percent of healthcare workers did not get the COVID booster for themselves last fall, so that tells you what the real consensus is,” Makary said.
Makary also questioned a new “evidence-based immunization schedule” published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) last month. The schedule defies CDC guidance by recommending COVID-19 vaccination for all children between 6 and 23 months of age “to help protect against serious illness.”
The AAP recommends a single dose of the COVID-19 vaccine for all children and adolescents 2 to 18 years old who are in a high-risk group, and for children in the same age group whose parent or guardian requests the shot.
Makary said the AAP is free to issue its own recommendations and welcomed a “civil discourse” with the organization — but added that the AAP is “the same group that insisted schools stay shut down.”
The AAP represents 67,000 pediatricians and receives substantial funding from the federal government and from Big Pharma — including vaccine manufacturers.
Related articles in The Defender
- Number of Children Who Died After COVID Shots Much Higher Than VAERS Reports Indicate, Analyst Says
- Sparks Fly as RFK Jr. Tells Senators CDC Failed Americans During COVID
- FDA to Provide Public With Daily Updates on Adverse Reactions to Drugs
- Trump Fires CDC Director Who Clashed With RFK Jr. Over Vaccine Policy
- Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get COVID Shots for Infants, Kids
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of “The Defender In-Depth” on CHD.TV.
The CDC Needed a Thorough Housecleaning to Restore Trust Dr. Joseph Varon
How did the CDC lose its way—and can it be saved? IMA President and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon shares his thoughts in a new op-ed in The Hill.
SEP 08, 2025 INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE
For 715 consecutive days — every single day — I put on full protective gear in the ICU at Houston’s United Memorial Medical Center, fighting COVID-19 on the frontlines. I never took a day off, because when lives hang in the balance, doctors don’t get the luxury of excuses. We act. We fight. We serve.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was created to serve with that same urgency — to protect Americans from infectious disease through science, transparency and rapid response. But what the public got instead during the pandemic was an agency more obsessed with narratives and control than with saving lives.
During the pandemic, the CDC didn’t just make mistakes — it fundamentally betrayed its mission. It manipulated data, censored debate and colluded with Big Tech to silence dissenting physicians. That isn’t science — that’s politics and narrative-control masquerading as public health, and it comes at a dear cost to this nation.
That’s why HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy must enact a forceful and immediate, top-to-bottom house cleaning.
Consider just a few of the documented failures.
The CDC released COVID-19 test kits with internally known fundamental defects, contributing to catastrophic delays in detecting the virus.
It shifted guidance back and forth on whether to require masks — not based on any evidence but under political pressure. This helped destroy public trust.
Then there’s the data manipulation — at least 25 documented statistical errors, 80 percent of them exaggerating the severity of the pandemic.
The agency suppressed transparency, refusing to release full vaccine injury data because the public “might misinterpret it.”
It colluded in censorship, training Facebook, X, and Google employees to erase posts from experienced physicians who challenged CDC orthodoxy.
It surveilled U.S. citizens, buying massive location-tracking databases to monitor lockdown compliance.
It also buried risk data, scrubbing evidence of myocarditis risk from the vaccine and overcounting child deaths from the virus. This fueled destructive school closures and unnecessary child masking.
These are not minor missteps. They represent institutional malpractice — an agency actively choosing political control over scientific honesty. It has cost countless lives.
Even as frontline doctors treated wave after wave of patients, the CDC insulated itself behind bureaucratic walls, doubling down on arrogance and ideology. Instead of humbly correcting course, the agency turned inward, obsessed with power and control.
The result? Americans no longer know if they can trust the very institution designed to protect them. Public health depends on trust. Once lost, it is nearly impossible to rebuild.
Again, that’s why Kennedy must take bold action now, at this juncture, to restore integrity. That means purging the political operatives and career bureaucrats who turned the CDC into a fortress of ideology. It means bringing in real doctors —leaders with actual hands-on clinical experience, not detached administrators or partisan activists. It means requiring full, unredacted release of all data — good, bad or inconvenient.
In short, to rebuild trust, Kennedy must make sure the CDC is putting patients and science first, not politics and profit.
The CDC desperately needs leaders who understand their first duty is not to narratives, not to politicians, and not to authority or control, but to the health and well-being of the American people.
The CDC’s failures during the COVID-19 pandemic were not just bureaucratic errors. They were betrayals that cost lives, undermined freedom and shattered trust. Unless we act now, the next public health crisis will expose an even weaker, more distrusted CDC — one that Americans may simply ignore from the outset.
As a doctor who has dedicated my life to saving patients, I will not stand silent. The American people deserve a CDC worthy of its name, that works harder to control diseases than it does to control narratives.
Notorious Beagle Breeder That Supplies Fauci-Funded Labs Hit with 300 Violations
[Ed.: When we execute Fauci for treason and mass murder, this is exactly how we should do it – on pubic TV, at prime time:
[Ed.: We’re discussing Mandates for vaccines, and for children in specific here, not vaccines in general. You can’t trust stupid.
Everything is the OPPOSITE of what you’ve been told. It wasn’t the vaccine that extinguished smallpox. Smallpox BECAME deadly BECAUSE of mass vaccination (and also, when treated by deadly methods.)
SEP 04, 2025
BS”D
Once again I’m bringing you a crucially important article on the history of smallpox by Roman Bystrianyk. You MUST read the absolutely astonishing timeline of this disease, which is tethered so tightly to the story of vaccines as to be inseparable. Tell me if smallpox doesn’t sound just like a “Covid 0.1,” complete with treatments that caused most of the deaths, plus shots that drove outbreaks and killed more people than the disease it was supposed to prevent.
How long have “they” been using the same playbook? Who are “they,” and why are they so bent on killing people with sickness and injections? What is really going on?
I hope that we discover the answers soon, but meanwhile please see the actual smallpox timeline, based on medical journals, medical textbooks, newspapers, and records of those times. All the sources are meticulously cited in Roman Bystrianyk’s article- please click his link to see them, as space did not permit including here: https://romanbystrianyk.substack.com/p/the-story-of-smallpox-and-vaccination. With great thanks to Roman Bystrianyk for his tremendous research and writing. Please subscribe to his substack!
By Roman Bystrianyk
“No sooner did Dr [Jenner] announce his discovery to the public, and its merits were examined, than every facility was given to its circulation. The rage was extreme, and fashionable, not only amongst the medical profession; but all classes of society…”[2] ― Thomas Brown, Surgeon, 1809
Vaccination. The history of smallpox and its supposed cure is a tale of bizarre theories, tragic failures, and relentless resistance. In the late 17th century, Thomas Sydenham, the Father of English medicine, called smallpox “the most slight and safe of all diseases” when properly managed.
The story of vaccination is far from the clean-cut victory we’re told it is. It’s a chaotic, controversial saga—littered with dubious claims, deadly mistakes, and bitter disputes. The history of smallpox and vaccination is as unsettling as it is revealing. Dare to dig deeper? The truth might shake everything you thought you knew.
Vaccine Hesitancy: A Disease of the Mind PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Vaccinology Defines A New Mental Illness to be Targeted by Weapons of Public Health
SEP 05, 2025
Vaccine hesitancy refers to a state of indecisiveness regarding vaccination decisions, distinct from outright refusal.[i] It encompasses delays in acceptance or refusal despite available services, influenced by factors including fear of side effects, confidence, complacency, and convenience.[ii] Recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a top global health threat in 2019, hesitancy has persisted since the advent of vaccines. Essentially vaccine hesitancy can be viewed as a new infectious mental illness to be targeted by public health agencies and the medical establishment.
We highlight key events in the history of vaccinology and societal hesitancy towards vaccines in our best selling book Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality.
Modern hesitancy surged with Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 seminal study linking MMR vaccination to autism. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted hesitancy, with rapid vaccine development raising concerns over lack of preclinical testing and assurances concerning pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, teratogenicity, oncogenicity, and genome toxicity. A deluge of safety reports, peer-reviewed manuscripts, and package insert warnings led to massive public loss of confidence in the COVID-19 immunization campaign, very low uptake of boosters, and doubts cast on the entire field of synthetic mRNA and adenoviral DNA research.
[Ed.: Help, help, I have a mental disease!!
[Ed.: This is an advertisement from The McCullough Foundation. I am posting it here because it is helpful for anyone living with the spike protein.]
Dr. McCullough: How To Test For Dangerous Spike Protein Levels
Freedom-fighting medical expert, Dr. Peter McCullough, is out with a new piece talking about a subject we have heard a lot about over the last few years: Spike protein.
From Dr. McCullough’s Substack:
In clinic today I want to address the most common question I get from patients, “have I been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein through infection, shedding, or vaccination, and what should I do about it?”
In a video, Dr. McCullough tackles exactly what spike protein is, how you test for it, and – most importantly – what you can do about it:
WATCH [5:03] https://twitter.com/i/status/1961866182035673251
Dr. McCullough lays out how to interpret the results of this Spike protein antibody test – and when to worry about it:
Here is a quick guide of interpretation of your results:
<1000 U/ml very low level past exposure, negligible risks
1000-5000 U/ml symptoms or problem could be related to Spike protein
>5000 U/ml Spike protein likely circulating in your bloodstream
10,000-25,000 U/ml very high risk for cardiac damage, blood clots, neurologic problems, autoimmunity, and potentially cancer
Remember the antibodies are an indirect reflection of Spike protein and do not change quickly. My advice is not to check the test again for a year. Above is one of my patients who has resolved his Spike syndrome with detoxification and you can see he has had a substantial drop in his Spike antibodies.
How to Treat High Spike Protein Levels
It is certainly progress for Americans to have access to a Spike protein antibody test, but the test is only half of the solution. Once you know, or suspect, that you have elevated spike protein levels, what should you do about it:
What can be done about high levels? The answer for most is the Ultimate Spike Detox from The Wellness Company. This is the only scientifically supported combination product following the principles of McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification.
Dr. McCullough’s Ultimate Spike Detox
For the last 3 years, Dr. McCullough has tirelessly searched for any molecule, compound, or botanical that could eliminate the spike.
While no single silver bullet has been found, Dr. McCullough’s patients have shown remarkable results with a combination of nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin.
This led Dr. McCullough to publish the first spike detoxification paper, “McCullough Protocol: Base Spike Detoxification” in major scientific journals.
If you or someone you love was vaccinated and is looking to secure their health, try Dr. McCullough’s own product: Ultimate Spike Detox.
It contains all of the researched ingredients in his academic paper, all in one convenient formula, and is produced here in the USA by The Wellness Company.
Thousands of people have taken Ultimate Spike Detox and have reclaimed their health. Customers are saying:
“Excellent product!!! Worked wonderfully! I’m so thankful for TWC! I got my health back!
“We ordered your spike protein cleans for our patients who took a couple of COVID 19 vaccinations. After about two weeks of them taking the supplements, their appetites increased and our mother with diagnosed heart issues claimed she wasn’t getting dizzy anymore.”
“I saw Dr. McCullough talk about the product and decided to give it a try. A month and a half later, I feel sooo much better. I also have recommended the product to family members to help them detox from the painful side effects of the vaccine.
“I feel like I have had brain fog for the past 18 months and after taking this supplement noticed the fog lifting finally. I plan to buy more for myself and now a friend suffering from heart issues.”
“I am grateful for the Wellness Company and for you coming out with this spike protein vitamins. I am a big believer in natural healing and not pharmaceutical drugs. Thank you for doing what is right and for speaking truth in a world that is so dark.”
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THE ULTIMATE SPIKE DETOX TODAY
