COMMENTARY / OPINION
Trump just took another big step toward World War III with Russia LEO HOHMANN
After first denying Ukraine’s request for long-range Tomahawk missiles, President Trump now concedes he has ‘sort of’ changed his mind, with only a few details on targets left to be worked out.
OCT 06, 2025
President Trump said Monday he has “sort of made a decision” on sending long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine for use against Russia.
Tomahawks can strike targets deep inside Russia, including Moscow. As you can see from the above graphic, the Tomahawk missile has a range more than five times that of the previously most lethal U.S. weapon sent to Ukraine, the ATACMS. Going from ATACMS to Tomahawks is no small step in the escalation of this war.
Trump was asked about it by a reporter Monday and you can watch his response here. He said:
“Yeah, I’ve sort of made a decision, pretty much. I think I’d want to find out what they’re doing with them, where are they sending them? I guess, I’d have to ask that question.”
What Trump seems to be saying here is that he’s approved the transfer of Tomahawks to Ukraine, but he’s just working out the details about targets the Ukrainians will be allowed to hit with these low-flying cruise missiles.
It’s absolutely chilling that a president can so casually and nonchalantly announce such a major step toward war with a rival nuclear-armed superpower like Russia and nobody in Congress or the media even questions him about the potential ramifications of such a decision.
Trump is likely to allow the Zelensky regime in Kiev, which is losing the war badly, to use the US-made cruise missiles to be fired at Russian energy infrastructure and against its military-industrial factories, but not against the Kremlin or other government sites frequented by Russia’s top leaders.
So we have another major escalation. Another new weapon system will be delivered to Ukraine. Because what Zelensky wants, Zelensky gets. That’s the pattern. And each new weapons transfer is more lethal and powerful than the previous.
Russian President Putin said just last week he did not think President Trump would approve of Zelensky’s request for Tomahawk missiles for use against his country. Putin indicated that if Trump were to grant the request, it would be the final nail in the coffin of U.S.-Russian relations. Those relations would be “destroyed,” he was quoted as saying by Reuters on October 5.
Now we find out today that the decision has already been made. The neocons win again. There are simply too many of these neocon warmongers around the President and they have his ear. This is why I’ve been predicting for a while now that America will get drawn further and further into this war, one small step at a time, and at some point it will no longer be possible to continue this game of trying to deny that we are, in fact, at war with Russia.
Every time we think maybe President Trump will pull us back from the edge of World War III, he makes another decision to draw us closer, continuing Biden’s policy of arming Russia’s enemy, right on Russia’s border, an enemy that was created by America for this specific purpose, to confront Russia as a proxy for NATO. When Ukraine can no longer fulfill its role of military tormenter to Russia because it has used up all its military-aged men, then NATO will send its troops in to fill the void.
Let’s put the shoe on the other foot for a moment. What if Mexico were converted into a client state of Russia, accepting Russian long-range missiles on its soil, for the sole purpose of firing them into the heartland of America? And what if the Russians sent over their top technicians to help fire those missiles deep inside U.S. territory, hitting military targets and energy infrastructure from Texas to Colorado and beyond? What would our response be to such a provocation? I think you know the answer.
Trump has said he is disappointed with Putin for not making peace and has at least twice in recent days described Russia as a “paper tiger” for failing to defeat Ukraine in “less than a week.” Putin last week flipped the script, questioning if NATO was not the “paper tiger” for failing to stop Russia’s advance.
Economist and trends analyst Martin Armstrong writes, citing a Wall Street Journal report, that President Trump signed off on providing U.S. intelligence agencies to supply targeting data to Ukraine for strikes on Russian energy infrastructure (oil refineries, pipelines, power plants) with Tomahawk missiles.
Armstrong explains that this suggests Washington will select the targets for Ukraine to attack. He chides the US administration for denying that we are in a war with Russia, writing:
“That is waging DIRECT WAR against Russia. They certainly can provide missiles to Venezuela and provide them targets for Washington, D.C., and put one right up Trump’s ass. I guess that would not be declaring war either.”
Sounds like two school yard bullies are about to square off. Neither one is ready to back down. Each has weapons capable of wiping out billions of people and burying the world in nuclear dust. Almost no Americans and no Russians want to go to war with each other, at least not anyone with their sanity intact. But, apparently, we have leaders that do want it. At least they are willing to risk it. And for what? Is Ukraine worth risking our own national existence, to the extent that we would cross a redline set by Putin and allow some of our most deadly long-range missiles to be fired into his country? Putin has access to even deadlier missiles, by the way, ones that travel at hypersonic speeds, as opposed to the subsonic Tomahawks.
This won’t end well, folks.
Pray for peace. Prepare for war. It’s coming to our shores. I don’t know when. But it’s coming.
The latest Gaza flotilla: What you may have missed by MOSHE PHILLIPS
Anti-Zionist radicals on the boats don’t seem to care about the residents of the Strip any more than Hamas terrorists do.
(Oct. 6, 2025 JNS
A close look at the boats used by anti-Israel extremists aboard the so-called “Gaza Flotilla,” which attempted to evade Israeli navy vessels and land in the Gaza Strip on Yom Kippur, reveals much about their true motivation—something that both journalists and Israel’s supporters have missed, though should not have.
You might have expected that the banners on the ships would feature messages like “Stop the Blockade,” “Feed Gaza” or even “Stop the Genocide,” but the boats I saw in the photos had no such messages at all. That’s because the anti-Zionist radicals on the boats don’t really care about the residents of Gaza any more than Hamas terrorists do, and they know that in reality, there’s no genocide or starvation.
The signs on the boats that I saw read:
“Free Gaza”
In response, it must be noted that before Oct. 7, 2023, no Israeli soldiers were in the Gaza Strip when Hamas launched its terrorist invasion. The disengagement of Israeli civilians and the withdrawal of Israeli soldiers were completed by Sept. 12, 2005.
“Free Palestine”
One is left wondering what these signs mean, but the meaning should be clear: Mahmoud Abbas, now 89, has been chairman of the Palestine Authority since 2004. And to this day, the PLO, which created the P.A., still features a map of “Palestine” that leaves zero room for a State of Israel of any size—“from the river to the sea.”
“Leve Palestina”
This last message—“Leve Palestina”—may be the most telling to understand the true motives of these haters. It almost certainly refers to a 1979 song that has this hate in its very first line: “Long live Palestine and crush Zionism. Long live, long live Palestine.” The song infamously glorifies violence and terrorism, stating: “And we have thrown stones at soldiers and police; and we have fired missiles.” In an August 2024 unabashed tribute piece about the song, reported by Al Jazeera, it seems that the song “has gained new life since … Oct. 7,” and YouTube videos with it have had millions of views.
In the first line of its coverage of the flotilla on Oct. 1, The New York Times reported: “Activists on a flotilla of vessels carrying humanitarian aid,” and later, “their mission is to deliver food during the humanitarian crisis there.” It should be plain that the fanatics’ only goals were to provoke Israel and ensure that the media continued to portray Israel as the only bad actor in the current war with Hamas. The Times and others complied and never analyzed the signs the ships carried.
And news reports said the ships carried only a nominal amount of actual aid; the effort was more symbolic.
The official website for the flotilla spells it out: “Our efforts build on decades of Palestinian resistance.” Despite claims of nonviolence on the part of the Israel-bashing Sumud flotilla fanatics, “Palestinian resistance” has meant one thing since the 1964 founding of the PLO (when Gaza was occupied by Egypt and Judea and Samaria was occupied by Jordan), and that one thing is violence. Are there any leaders advocating for nonviolence among Palestinian Arabs? If so, where are they? Such figures rarely make headlines.
All of this reminds me of the quote below from a 2001 book, Eyes Upon the Land (Part 1): The Principles Underlying the Arab-Israeli Conflict, adapted by Eliyahu Touger from the Sichos in English Collection. It should have received much more attention from Israel’s supporters than it did, especially in light of the extremist flotilla news, as well as the recent decisions by far too many nations to recognize a nonexistent “State of Palestine.”
It said: “There is a fundamental argument that must be dealt with. At the bottom of all the Arab rhetoric lies one basic claim: ‘You are intruders. This is our land. We had been living here for centuries, and then you decided to take it from us.’ Once it is established that the Jews have a valid right to the Land of Israel, then the violence, hatred and disregard for life that has characterized the Arab position can be judged for what it is. Unless that right is established, the Arabs will always claim that they have a valid goal: reclaiming a land that is rightfully theirs. And once validity is granted to their goal, the debate whether all means are acceptable to attain it or not is one of philosophy.”
Israel’s supporters and advocates must do more to educate the public about the Jewish people’s authentic ownership of the land of Israel. It is absolutely crucial.
MOSHE PHILLIPS Moshe Phillips, a veteran pro-Israel activist and author, is the national chairman of Americans For a Safe Israel (AFSI). A former board member of the American Zionist Movement, he previously served as national director of the U.S. division of Herut and worked with CAMERA in Philadelphia. He was also a delegate to the 2020 World Zionist Congress and served as editor of The Challenger, the publication of the Tagar Zionist Youth Movement. His op-eds and letters have been widely published in the United States and Israel.
[Ed.: Greta ten years ago holding her breath for global warming:
Trump Plays The Card on Hamas! A Dramatic Shift Is Unfolding in Gaza… [54:23] Alex Traiman and Josh Hasten
October 6, 2025 JNS TV
Hamas Thought They Knew EVERYTHING About Israel – They Were Dead Wrong (w/Caroline Glick) [7:43]
Oct 5, 2025 JNS TV | Straight Up with Danny Seaman
Is Israel on the brink of victory in Gaza and is Trump’s peace plan the key? Former senior Israeli official Danny Seaman sits down with acclaimed journalist and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s advisor Caroline Glick for a conversation about the latest developments in the war with Hamas, the proposed Trump-backed Gaza deal and the future of Israeli security.
Caroline Glick, drawing on her decades of experience and close ties to both Netanyahu and Trump, argues that Israel has already achieved most of its strategic war objectives. Hamas, she says, is no longer a viable regime or military force, and the current deal on the table offers Israel everything it set out to achieve while denying Hamas any of its goals. She details how the war has reshaped Israel’s military posture and redefined the role of leadership in this critical moment.
The conversation explores the terms of the peace proposal and the practical, no-nonsense approach of leaders like Netanyahu and Trump. Glick also addresses the emotional toll of war and the resilience of Israeli society. She explains why this is a fight for survival and why the strength Israel has shown in the past two years has fundamentally changed how its enemies perceive it.
CHAPTERS
00:00 – Intro & Audience Requests for Caroline Glick
01:13 – Caroline Glick Joins the Studio
02:00 – Netanyahu, Trump, and Optimism in Israel
03:24 – The Gaza Deal: Israel’s War Goals Within Reach
05:15 – What the Deal Means for Hamas
06:37 – Why This Moment is Different for Netanyahu
08:10 – Faith in the IDF and the People of Israel
09:42 – Security Control Over Gaza: What’s Changing?
11:05 – Trump, the Nobel Prize, and Real Motives for Peace
12:17 – Biblical Strength & the Path to Real Peace
13:55 – The World Misunderstood Israel’s Endurance
15:24 – Heavy Costs—but National Resolve Remains Strong
17:00 – Closing: “We’re Stronger Now Than Before Oct 7”
The Historical Secrets for Israeli-Palestinian Peace DANIEL CLARKE-SERRET
“Eternal peace” requires a paradigm shift, not a press conference.
OCT 06, 2025 The Future of Jewish
U.S President Donald Trump’s 21-point plan for ending the war in Gaza has been hailed by the man himself as the dawn of “eternal peace.”
It’s fair to say that the president isn’t a student of history, otherwise he wouldn’t have dared fallen into such a hubristic trap.
The historical precedents for “eternal peace” haven’t been all that promising. (That’s a British understatement.) A treaty with precisely that appellation was signed in 1686 between Poland and Russia. Its clauses included the ceding of Kiev to Russia and, as all irony-allergic readers are aware, the status of that city has never been in doubt again.
In reality, Russia and Poland have been in constant conflict ever since, to the point where Poland completely ceased to exist for a short time. She has been occupied by Russia in the context of both the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, and to this day Poland feels it necessary to be a member of an American-led defence alliance to ward of the possibility of the bear’s attack.
Meanwhile, Ukraine, of Kiev fame, is currently engaged in an existential war with her ever-aggressive neighbour lurking menacingly on her territory. So much for eternal peace.
Lest we think this phenomenon is limited to Europe, we would do well to remind ourselves of the events of the Early Middle Ages. There, in the heart of the Northern Middle East, the Eastern Roman Byzantines and the Persian Sassanians finally came to terms.
In a famed treaty of 532 CE, known alternatively as the “Perpetual Peace” or “The Treaty of Eternal Peace,” Byzantine Emperor Justinian I and the Sassanid King Khosrow I agreed to a permanent cessation of hostilities between the two warring empires. It was meant to endure indefinitely, but needless to say it broke down in short order. A mere eight years later, the Persians breached their treaty obligations by resuming their hostilities against the Byzantine Empire. It is in this light that Trump is perhaps unwise to toast his diplomacy with a poisoned chalice.
Yet none of this is to say that his peace efforts are unappreciated. True enough, he is motivated by the baubles of a Nobel Peace Prize, and he has an ego which challenges the Mongol Empire for size, but, nonetheless, his efforts may indeed lead to the release of all the hostages, that being the condition of just the first stage of the plan. If indeed he triumphs in this regard, we will gladly thank him for his intervention. Nonetheless, what he’s most unlikely to realise is eternal peace and just like the ominous 532 CE precedent: Hostilities are sure to return in the near future.
Is this cynicism? Shouldn’t we just give peace a chance? To be sure, the precedents in Ukraine and the Middle East are far from rosy, but isn’t it a council of doom to despair before the starting whistle has been blown?
I should state most emphatically that eternal peace between two nations is entirely possible and, as this essay goes on, we shall unveil one particularly prominent example of it. Indeed, in the Byzantine-Sassanian case, a perpetual unity of sorts did eventually come — just not in the way that either empire expected. With the arrival of Islam, both polities were utterly crushed and their territories were joined as one under the tender sword of the Umayyad Empire. This case study shows us that peace is possible, but it takes an unprecedented paradigm shift — in this case, the crushing defeat of both powers by a third party.
But is there another way? Can perpetual peace come to pass without the mutual destruction of the two warring parties? In a famous essay of the same name, Immanuel Kant discusses this very issue. The German philosopher conceived of a world without boundaries or frontiers, a cosmopolitan “soulless despotism” where states became a thing of the imagined past.
In his own prose, he dismissed the idea of a world government, but the consequence of his position makes it a logical necessity. Kant famously believed in the concept of moral universalism, that we owe duties to all human individuals equally as human individuals and that it was wrong-headed to impute specific duties towards family, friends, community, and state as other philosophies have traditionally done. We see the fruits of this thinking today in the “Woke” movement and in talks of open borders.
It would be improper to dismiss Kant’s essay out of hand, but as a recipe for perpetual peace, it is naively wanting, even undesirable.
So, what options are left for eternal peace?
Is it a pure utopian dream only imaginable in the biblical book of Isaiah? Is it a fantasy only capable of realization through crushing military defeat — thereby bringing additional problems in its wake?
I say, again, that eternal peace, at least between some nations, is entirely possible and the historical record confirms as much. Nonetheless, as stated previously, there needs to be a thus far unconceived paradigm shift.
The best example of such a realignment taking place, leading to two centuries of peace, with a near certain prospect of eternal peace onwards into the future, is the relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. Although they fought a bitter Revolutionary War, followed by an encore in 1812, the two nations soon came to peaceful terms. Why?
It is easy to dismiss the special relationship on the basis that both countries are English-speaking, have a similar heritage and indeed, in the decades prior to independence, were one country. Lest we forget that the casus belli of the contest was the belief that Crown-in-Parliament was failing to respect the liberty of British subjects.
Yet, despite the close pre-war relationship between Britain and America, the eternal peace that we see to this day was never a sure thing. It was the actions of the leadership, George III, John Adams, and particularly George Washington that allowed the parties to stride towards the future in confidence and peace.
George Washington had the bearing of a general and the stature of a leader without the avaricious ambition to match. To be sure, he did not display the meekness of Moses: When the Continental Congress was in the process of selecting a Commander-in-Chief, Washington unsubtly showed up in a military uniform. He did want the job. Yet his mild presentation of candidature was married with a genuine humility.
Upon being mocked by newspaper cartoons as president, the normally self-controlled Washington flew into a rage, balling that he didn’t want the position in the first place. Furthermore, in an act entirely unprecedented and unexpected, he resigned his military commission immediately upon winning the Revolutionary War.
The latter point cannot be emphasized enough. In an oft repeated tale, Thomas Jefferson had reacted with profound shock when Alexander Hamilton pronounced that he admired Julius Caesar. It moved him so that it became his go-to dinner party anecdote. And what was the issue with Caesar for Jefferson? That he embodied the sum of all fears for a nation contemplating Republicanism.
The Founding Fathers had an abiding anxiety born of history, namely that a successful military commander, with a loyal and all-conquering army, would seize the levers of power as a tyrant. That, after all, had been the historical experience of Republican government. That, after all, had been the lesson of Caesar, the moment that he crossed the Rubricon. Would that be fate of America?
So, when George Washington resigned his position and returned to civilian life, he instantly became a hero. He had bucked the precedent of Caesar and ultimately became the power-unhungry president that the new nation so desperately needed. In a letter which changed all of history.
At last, the hour of republicanism had come — with the meekest of generals who knew when it was time to go. Everyone had expected Washington to seize power, but through his resignation, his awe-struck citizens knew what they had to do: They needed George Washington as the figurehead of the new nation. No more would the Monarch’s birthday be celebrated. Instead the meek, victorious general would take his symbolic place as a spiritual father figure. Indeed, from as early as 1778, Washington was spoken of as the father of the country.
The actions of Washington that day in stepping away from power literally changed the world. They were the paradigm shift that was needed for eternal peace, both internally within a liberty-loving America and in terms of its relationship with the former mother country.
Prior to the resignation, but hearing of its unprecedented possibility, King George III allegedly said that such an action would make Washington “the greatest man in the world.” So, when it actually happened, the King presumably thought that he was witnessing history in the making; an extraordinary act of humility that changed the perception of American Republicanism in the eyes of the British state. It laid the foundation for eternal peace, a near-utopia that was sealed in the events to come.
In 1785, when John Adams met King George III as America’s first minister to Britain, he expressed his nation’s desire for lasting friendship and mutual respect. The King, remarkably gracious in defeat, replied that though he had opposed separation, he now fully accepted American independence and wished for enduring peace based on their shared language, faith, and heritage. Their exchange marked an unprecedented moment of dignity and reconciliation between former enemies.
These two gentlemen show us the path to peace.
In life and history, conflict is inevitable. War, as a last resort, is sometimes unavoidable. But the war having being won, it is incumbent on the victor to be gracious and for the loser to accept the result. Though they may have lost the battle, the vanquished is charged with the responsibility of looking to the future, building a shared destiny of co-operation and friendship.
What was achieved by Adams and the King that day is a lesson that the Arab states in general and the Palestinians in particular have so singularly failed to learn. Instead of accepting the result of Israel’s War of Independence, which the Arabs themselves initiated, they have persistently acted with aggression and hostility towards the modern State of Israel.
No George III has risen up to say, “I was the last to consent to the Separation, but the Separation having been made and having become inevitable, I have always said, as I say now, that I would be the first to meet the friendship of Israel as an independent Power.”
In short, there has been no paradigm shift. Instead we have seen history on rinse and repeat. So, while the United States and Britain are family happily united, the Jews and the Arab world are family unhappily estranged.
When Donald Trump speaks of eternal peace, it is, of course, possible, but it would require the Palestinians to take upon the lessons just articulated: Acceptance, forgiveness, leadership and a complete paradigm shift. Perhaps too much for the President to stake his reputation upon? Very probably.
Yet, there is at least one opportunity that should be seized forthwith: Trump would do well to read his history books and finally follow the example of Washington: a man of modesty, humility, and a refusal to grasp for power. These are the actions that can change the world and finally, possibly, lead to eternal peace.
Shocking Truth About the Antichrist Revealed… [45:56]
October 2, 2026 Destiny Image
Billy Crone reveals the truth about King Charles and other major end-time players…
Israel was sold victory, and got surrender. YONATAN DAON-STERN
U.S. President Donald Trump, with the help of Hamas’ backers, is turning the Jewish state’s surrender into his “Peace Prize.”
OCT 05, 2025
Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stood at the White House, next to U.S. President Donald Trump, and declared:
“I support your plan to end the war in Gaza, which achieves our war aims. It will bring back to Israel all our hostages, dismantle Hamas’s military capabilities, end its political rule, and ensure that Gaza never again poses a threat to Israel.”
He told us this plan would “achieve all our war objectives without any further bloodshed.”
This was supposed to be the turning point. The victory speech. Netanyahu told us this was the path to victory. Trump crowned it Netanyahu’s “crowning achievement.”
And then came the switch.
Trump didn’t present this plan as cautious diplomacy. He dressed it up as if it were biblical prophecy fulfilled. His own words:
“This is a big, big day, a beautiful day, potentially one of the great days ever in civilization… after 2,000, 3,000 years, whatever it is.”
This isn’t leadership; it’s narcissistic lunacy. To call a temporary ceasefire and hostage deal “the greatest day in thousands of years” is insane. It shows this was never about Israel’s victory; it was about Trump’s own myth-making.
And the myth-making isn’t for free. Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize. That is what this is all about: personal glory. He is prepared to sacrifice Israel itself for his prize, his “eternal peace,” and his legacy.
By the way, this is the same “Peace Prize” that was once seriously proposed for Hitler himself and has already been awarded to a rogues’ gallery of dishonourable men, including Yasser Arafat, for the Oslo Accords that began the very chain of appeasement and illusion that led us straight to October 7th.
Perhaps this dishonourable prize is indeed fitting for such a dishonourable man.
At the United Nations just days earlier, Netanyahu had promised to “finish the job.” He told the world Hamas would be destroyed. The Israel Defense Forces even broadcast his speech into Gaza by loudspeaker, telling the people they had a last chance to rid themselves of Hamas.
But standing in Washington, he gave it all away. He endorsed a plan cooked not just in the White House, but in Doha, Ankara, Islamabad, and Cairo. Trump bragged about it: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, every one of them backing the plan.
Why would these states, which cheer on Palestinian terror and many of which actively support it, suddenly support a “peace plan” that dismantles Hamas? This is not because it dismantles Hamas, but rather because it dismantles Israel, freezes its momentum, and places Israel’s fate in the Arabs’ hands.
Within days, Trump declared the oxymoron of our time: “Hamas is ready for peace.” He demanded that Israel stop bombing. What Netanyahu sold as victory turned into restraint, delay, and international supervision.
This reminds me of the earlier Trump demand during the Israel-Iran truce: He explicitly told Israel, “do not drop those bombs,” after Iran had already launched missiles that struck Be’er Sheva and killed Israeli civilians. Jets were turned back. As retaliation planes soared, Trump forced Israel’s hand, making us stand down. It is baffling that Netanyahu did not see that coming.
This isn’t victory. This is being played. This is being set up.
And Hamas? They accepted what suited them. They promised hostages “according to the exchange formula … with the necessary field conditions.” They praised Trump’s leadership. They smiled at Qatar and Turkey. Hamas spokesman Musa Abu Marzouk said openly on Al Jazeera: “We will hand over the weapons to the Palestinian state, whoever rules Gaza will hold the weapons.” In other words: Gaza will not be disarmed. Hamas’ guns remain in Gaza until a Palestinian state exists, which means never on Israel’s terms.
Osama Hamdan spelt it out further: “Attempts to remove Hamas from the political scene will not succeed.” “We will not accept foreign forces in Gaza.” “When a Palestinian state is established, the weapons will be at its disposal.”
He even invoked the hostages as leverage, saying corpses are buried in areas where Israeli forces are present, implying that Israeli withdrawals are required just so Hamas can access the bodies. This is not demilitarisation. This is not disarmament. This is a declaration that Hamas remains in power, with weapons intact, until Israel itself is destroyed.
And somehow, we accepted this. Netanyahu told us Hamas would be disarmed under this plan, when Hamas itself told the world it would not. In other words, they will not give up their guns. Not to Trump, not to Netanyahu, not even to Tony Blair. They will only give up their weapons when Israel itself is destroyed and replaced by “Palestine.” And somehow, we accepted this. Netanyahu told us Hamas would be disarmed under this plan, when Hamas itself told the world it would not.
What, then, has been achieved? Not the war aims Netanyahu promised. Not the destruction of Hamas. Not the disarmament of Gaza. What has been achieved is the victory of the hostage movement. This is what the world is celebrating: that the hostages will be freed. And let me say clearly, no war in history has ever been won because hostages were freed. Not one.
We had the hostages on October 6th. Victory is not bringing them back. Victory is making sure the ideology that kidnaps Jews goes extinct. Victory is destroying the idea that kidnapping pays.
But what have we done instead? We have rewarded it. We have proven that kidnapping Israelis works: It brings ceasefires and prestige, and it even brings them back their murderers. We have taken the deepest humiliation of October 7th and enshrined it as the definition of “peace.”
This is the result of Israel making the return of the hostages the most important issue. This is not a victory. It is defeat, surrender, sacrifice.
Where is the justice for all those who died needlessly on October 7th? What about the soldiers who gave their lives and who have spent almost two years now fighting? What about the Israelis who put their lives, their bodies, their livelihoods, and their economic futures at risk to defend their homeland?
Think of every parent who buried a child after October 7th. Think of the soldiers who marched into tunnels, the ones who never came home, the ones who came home mangled and broken. Are their deaths being paid for with the cheap currency of a photo op, a “hostage deal,” and the promise of someone else’s peace prize? This isn’t just impractical. It is profoundly immoral. It is a betrayal of every life spent defending this country.
We have been down this rabbit hole before, the Oslo Accords and the illusions of “recognition” used as moral cover, the appeasement dressed as diplomacy. Each step emboldened the enemy; each concession normalised the abnormal. Each time we surrendered moral clarity for the promise of normalisation, the price rose. We rewarded terror with legitimacy, and now the process that began decades ago has delivered us to this carnage.
The only way out is to stop the loop of suicide. We must stop rewarding the kidnapping of our children. We must stop pretending that normalisation with regimes that bankroll or excuse terror is a fair trade for our survival. We must stop sacrificing our boys so that others can write themselves into history books and collect prizes. Our first allegiance must be to our people, our dead, our soldiers, our children. We must stand for justice first, not spectacles. We must demand accountability for every life lost, not deals that let the perpetrators go home with their guns and their prestige.
This is one of the most important reasons Israel was founded: to be a refuge, to defend a people who could not otherwise survive. We seem to have forgotten that. We are paying the price now, in blood and dignity. If we do not reclaim justice as our policy, there will be nothing left of Zionism but a museum exhibit and a burnt blue and white flag.
This is the result of all these delegations to Qatar and all the “mediations” that have kept our enemies in business. This is the result of all those “Surrender Now” protests every week, the emotional spectacles, and the vice-signalling. This is the result of surrendering the moral high ground to emotionalists who’d rather spill out their feelings on camera than use their brains. This is the result of this nation’s emotional state. We end up sacrificing tomorrow for the present; we choose optics over outcomes.
Wars are not won with exchange deals. They are won with the enemy’s unconditional surrender. Don’t forget it. If they are setting the terms and conditions, we are not the winners. Anyone who tries to sell this as a victory is a liar.
We must challenge this with all our power. We must talk to ministers, to Knesset members, to anyone who will listen. We must go on the streets if we must. We must use the internet, write, call, and organise. Show your voice. If we do not act now, maybe we will never be able to in the future. Fight with words, with votes, with presence, with everything legally possible.
This is relevant for the entire world. The response from the Muslim Brotherhood makes the global consequence explicit. They celebrate this as a model and a school for future action. In their message, translated below, they say:
“Hamas has mastered the art of military combat and the art of international political combat. … This is a qualitative leap for Hamas and a new school of struggle that will be studied by future generations. We are with the resistance. … They were right when they fired the first shot.”
This is not a fringe reaction. This is instruction and propaganda. It shows that our enemies see this not as a setback but as a template: combine terror, kidnappings, and relentless lobbying until the world rewrites the rules for you. They will teach this to recruits, to movements, to confused allies and to a sympathetic media.
If our deal becomes their curriculum, then the consequences are horrific and immediate: more attacks, more kidnappings, and more global celebration of our humiliation. This is not an unintended side effect; it is the foreseeable reaction of a movement that reads victory differently than we do. They do not see the return of hostages as a cost; they see it as proof that the method works.
This deal effectively sanctions the kidnapping of every Jew all over the world!
Tragically, Israel is a nation on the brink of suicide.
It has become a nation that begs its enemies for surrender — a nation that, by definition, cannot win. It is a nation whose leaders broadcast targets in advance and tell its enemies where to go to avoid being hurt. It is a nation that cannot even name its own enemy. It is a nation that confuses defeat with victory, self-sacrifice with morality. It is a nation so morally inverted that it feeds its own enemy while starving its own people of the justice they deserve; it calls itself “the most moral army in the world,” the “virtue” of sacrificing its heroic soldiers for the appeasement of the BBC.
It is a nation whose leader surrenders its independence to the whims of foreign powers.
And worst of all, it is a nation whose people cheer as this happens, mistaking submission for salvation. This is not merely a mistake. This is a path to suicide. And the time bomb, from the moment this deal is inked, will begin ticking until the next October 7th. I don’t know how many will die, whether I will survive this, whether you will survive this, or how many people will be taken hostage.
This is fundamentally the responsibility of our prime minister, whose leadership has failed to prevent this from happening. Look at what is going on around the world: the massacre at a synagogue in Manchester just a few days ago and the celebratory protests that followed in England. Jews everywhere are in greater danger than at any time since World War II. This is not an accident. This global rot is connected to the erosion of our moral clarity.
The Palestinians got a state. They got international recognition. All over the world, people support them and cheer for them. And we, we sign our own death warrant. That is what is happening now, not just in Gaza but globally.
This is where we have come; this is how far we have fallen.
They get their murderers back from our prisons. They keep their weapons. They keep their ideology. As Abu Marzouk said plainly: “Whoever rules Gaza will hold the weapons.”
And what do we get? We get back our own people, half alive, severely traumatised, while they get everything. We gain nothing. We reward terror. We prove to the world that October 7th works.
It is truly beyond belief. And yet here we are.
We are being set up. We are baited by promises and myth-making. We are accepting a framework that turns justice into theatre and hands the initiative to the very people who attacked us. This is not a mistake. It is a choice, a choice made by leadership that values optics and prizes over the survival of our people.
If you want to change this, do not walk away. Do not whisper in the comments and go home. Do something. Talk to your friends, your family, and the Knesset members. Take to the street, write, broadcast, and organise. If not now, when? If not us, who?
Before it’s too late (it’s not), fight. Fight for whatever is left of Zionism. Fight for victory defined on our terms, not on the altar of someone else’s prize.
If you will it, it is no dream.
Who is financing the destabilization of America? DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
This is “start a war” money. It’s “launch a revolution” money!
OCT 05, 2025
Billionaire Deep State supporters eager to force the United States into a one-world government pour millions into nonprofits which promise wonders and deliver misery—from main street riots to the epidemic of abortions to pressuring for “climate change prevention” to organizations promoting transsexual education in grade schools and more.
If a nonprofit’s activities will further destabilize traditional America, the Deep State is all for it and is eager to fund it. Dr. Peter Breggin and Ginger Breggin interviewed Scott Walter, the president of Capital Research Center, an organization dedicated to investigating and exposing abuses among some foundations, charities, and other nonprofits that are spending money in unauthorized manners, promoting damaging actions in the US and around the world.
And it’s not just a little money. This is “start a war” money. It’s “launch a revolution” money! Ultimately, it is “suppress freedom and constitutional liberties” money. As the publisher description of the book declared on the Amazon page, “The money is staggering. In the 2018 election cycle, Arabella’s nonprofits took in $1.2 billion, more than double the fundraising of the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee combined. In the 2020 election cycle, Arabella’s fundraising spiked to $2.4 billion.”
Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, hateful comments about Kirk’s death and threats against other conservative figures have proliferated on the internet through social media outlets, and these are being investigated for criminal violations.
Our guest helps to map out the incredible reach and influence of the Deep State billionaires who donate to the umbrella group—Arabella—filtering funds down to nonprofits that share their values and promote their anti-American views.
Scott Walter’s book, Arabella: The dark money network of leftist billionaires secretly transforming America. Arabella is the guidebook that helps us grasp where all the taxpayer fortunes went after they were allocated by USAID and other government entities. This book will assist citizens, investigators, and journalists alike in untangling the nest of ill-willed organizations working on dismantling the United States and the Constitution.
Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America
Exposes Arabella Advisors as a major “dark money” operation that channels billions into progressive causes through opaque networks and deceptive grassroots groups, revealing its significant influence on U.S. politics and… Read more →
The Breggin Hour can be heard on Saturday and Sunday at 4 pm ET live on AmericaOutLoud.news. For podcast episodes listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. All episodes of The Breggin Hour are available on podcast networks worldwide every Monday.
Red-Green Axis Peggy Tierney
OCT 05, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
If you haven’t figured it out yet – Communist China & Iran-Qatar (backed by the NWO and the UN) want Islamo-Communism to rule America and for our country to be divided, sick and weak. Their foot soldiers are the enemy within.
The alliance between atheist Communism and political Islam is called the RED-GREEN AXIS and sadly many Americans are clueless about this. The RED-GREEN AXIS is our real enemy here on earth.
Our enemies in the RED-GREEN axis are buying our farmland & our Hollywood movie studios, disrupting our energy and communication systems, manipulating our weather systems, controlling our news networks and social media, stealing our military technology, poisoning our children and our atmosphere and spying on, blackmailing and bribing our politicians, judges and juries.
Islamo-Communist billionaires in America, Europe, Communist China, Qatar and around the world fund left-wing NGOs (non-profits) – like those run by Koch, Soros and Clinton. The NGOs then organize & radicalize the “purple haired” Antifa and “masked Jihadi” foot soldiers on college campuses and in our streets.
These NGOs also fund the mass migration of people from Islamo-Communist countries who hate us – under the guise of helping. Some of
those “migrants” turn into domestic pirates and steal our resources and terrorists who commit political violence.
Around the world, these terrorist foot soldiers and mercenaries are called Antifa, Hamas, Hezbollah, MS-13, Tren de Aragua and more…they used to be called Brownshirts, the Gestapo, the Red Guard…they just changed their names!
‘The Blasphemy Business’: The Persecution of Christians, August 2025 by Raymond Ibrahim
October 5, 2025 at 5:30 am
- “What we see in Africa today is a kind of silent genocide or silent, brutal, savage war that is occurring in the shadows and all too often ignored by the international community… [J]ihadist groups are in a position to take over not one, not two, but several countries in Africa…. It’s very dangerous for the national security of the United States…. Christians are going to be targeted and destroyed.” — Alberto Miguel Fernandez, geopolitical analyst and former U.S. diplomat, Fox News, August 7, 2025, Mozambique.
- The Islamic State (ISIS) released a newsletter praising its “mujahideen” [jihadists] for targeting and slaughtering the Christians of Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mozambique mentioned above, and urging followers to replicate these attacks in Europe…. It praises the massacres and beheadings of Christians inside churches, and attacks on Christian communities, all of which left “pools of blood.” It calls on its followers to offer Christians three choices: “If they refuse Islam and the jizyah tax, the third option is murder.” — MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.
- “Our conquering ancestors ruled with swords, advancing legions and leading the way, until they terrorized the nations of their time, who came to them willingly or unwillingly, surrendering and submissive. This is the truth, and anything beyond it is false.” — ISIS newsletter, reported by MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.
- The “hearts still ache for revenge against the Christians of Europe. The call is still open to the heroes of Islam to attack them again and invade them in their own backyards and implement the divine rulings against them as their brothers did in Africa, and Allah will surely support those who support Him.” — ISIS newsletter, reported by MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.
- Below are some of the more notable incidents of the ongoing genocide being carried out against Christians in Nigeria….
- “The herdsmen chased and shot at farmers as if they were animals.” — morningstarnews.org, September 1, 2025, Nigeria.
- “The culmination of the efforts to stop the [church’s] construction took place on Sunday, July 27, 2025. The construction committee was subjected to a mass lynching by government officials and residents….” — Rev. Puput Yuniatmoko, persecution.org, August 8, 2025, Indonesia.
- “While the language of the draft agreement [between Azerbaijan and Armenia] is general in nature, it mentions combating intolerance, racism, and violent extremism. Absent from the list of vices to be countered was religious persecution and ethnic cleansing — longstanding practices of the totalitarian Azerbaijan regime.” — persecution.org, August 14, 2025, Azerbaijan.
- “During detention, we were forced to drink water from Lotas [vessels typically used in toilets]. One person would open their mouth while another poured water through the same vessel.” — Zakria John, morningstarnews.org, August 20, 2025, Pakistan.
- “Nabeel Masih, a 25-year-old Christian from Lahore, died… after years of neglect, abuse, and lack of crucial medical care. At 16….Masih was accused by a man named Akhtar Ali of posting a blasphemous image on Facebook….Police had the image removed to prevent unrest, erasing the only evidence that could prove whether Masih had posted it. ” — morningstarnews.org, August 20, 2025, Pakistan.g
My Name’s Jihad; Where’s Your Closest Synagogue? | Nicholas De Santo [4:07] Nicholas De Santo
Oct 3, 2025
🇩🇪 🎤 See me live in Berlin, Germany: I Heard You Want Your Country Back!, 7 November 2025:
and
Leo Hohmann – Very Important to Hear. Trap is Set. War, Collapse, Digital Prison and More! [51:15]
Oct 1, 2025
Episode 586 of the A Minute to Midnite Show. Tony K is joined by Leo Hohmann. This is one of the most important discussions, with information that everyone should hear and share! This is a big wake-up call!
[Ed.: This vindicates me!!]
Dystopian Britain policing how many sodas you are allowed to drink now PETER IMANUELSEN
Free refills of certain sodas are now banned.
OCT 04, 2025
When you think that clown world couldn’t get more absurd, it suddenly does.
You see, the British government is now controlling what food you are allowed.
They have BANNED supermarkets and stores in England from offering buy one get one free promotions on certain food items such as snacks and candy, cakes, ice cream and pizza. Food that they deem to be unhealthy.
And they have also banned restaurants and cafes in England from offering refills of Coca Cola and other sodas containing sugar.
Of course, they say that this is being done to reduce obesity rates in the country.
Sure, drinking soda with sugar and eating lots of snacks and candy is an excellent way to gain lots of weight, something that we all know is not healthy.
But the fact that the government is now coming in and controlling what people can and cannot eat is dystopian. They literally banned free refills at restaurants. This is ridiculous.
This ban comes into effect shortly after the government announced a MANDATORY digital ID. Yes, people will be BANNED from working if they don’t have a digital ID.
A petition calling on the government to scrap the digital ID plans got almost 3 million signatures. Yet they responded by completely ignoring the concerns of the public.
Sounds almost like people won’t be able to earn a living if they don’t get a mark…
What’s next? Will they add a social credit score that tracks how many Coca Cola’s you have bought during the month, and if you exceed your allowed limit, your digital ID turns red and suddenly you are banned from flying?
The way things are going, the foundations for an authoritarian control system is rapidly being built.
Already, over 12.000 people are arrested every year in Britain for things they posted on social media. Preachers have been arrested on the street for the crime of reading from the Bible.
You really wouldn’t think something like this could happen in a Western country in 2025.
But now it’s happening and the mainstream media is not only ignoring it, but they seem to like this agenda.
But I’m here to expose it and bring you all the latest news to navigate this strange new world we are living in.
Make sure to stay subscribed – OR upgrade to a paid subscription to help me reach even more people with the REAL NEWS that is being censored by the media.
Thank you!
