COMMENTARY / OPINION
Duress, State-sponsored, State-protected contract crimes, and the Bank for International Settlements Katherine Watt
Exploring the duress defense for contract bioterrorists.
I’ve been reading Tower of Basel by Adam LeBor, about the 1930 founding and subsequent history of the supranational Bank for International Settlements.
A series of banking incidents during the Spanish Civil War and World War II — the looting of gold and other assets through the BIS as transactional intermediary — illuminate a legal dilemma that still confronts BIS and its public and private sub-agencies.
Duress can provide grounds for judicial nullification of contracts.
International and federal courts, if any should emerge from their current status as BIS vassals, could nullify the contracts signed between the globalist infiltrators in the US government, the bioweapons manufacturers, and the state- and local agencies engaged in the front-line bioweapons attacks on victims, on grounds that the contracts were signed under duress and are therefore invalid.
This would mean helping private bioweapons dealers (masquerading as pharmaceutical and non-governmental organization executives) reduce their own criminal exposure, by creating opportunities for them to flip on their supervising accomplices in exchange for lesser sentences for themselves.
It would give them an opportunity to join with past and prospective victims to mount joint legal attacks against the individuals and institutions financing and directing the global chemical and biological warfare program.
I’m exploring it despite my interest in seeing corporate executives face full justice for their crimes, because I’m even more interested in killing the nascent and rapidly growing so-called biodefense industry, which is, in truth, a biomunitions industry.
I’m interested in killing all of its grotesque techological platforms including but not limited to mRNA injections.
5 Consequences of the China Saudi-Iran Normalization Deal BY ELLIOT NAZAR
MARCH 16, 2023 – 1. China’s Growing Presence in the Middle East
Following the shocking news that Chinese officials brokered the agreement between Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Republic of Iran, many experts warned that this move was significant for Beijing, which is trying to grow its influence in a region heavily dominated by the U.S. As the Communist government continues to strengthen its economic and military presence throughout the world, officials have hoped to make inroads in Saudi Arabia and Iran through economic and military benefits in the hopes that China’s military can have a presence in the Persian Gulf, a key strategic waterway for oil flow. Should the normalization agreement and its terms expand under Beijing’s grip, China will have turned one of America’s key strategic allies away from its side and into the arms of Beijing, granting the Chinese government a new avenue for oil energy to support its economy and navy. The new agreement will also allow China to strengthen its relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran, helping the mullahs circumvent international sanctions and provide resources to keep the regime alive from internal and external threats.
2. America’s Reduced Presence in the Middle East
With the leaving of Afghanistan and the war on Ukraine ongoing, this agreement has experts warning about America’s reduced presence in the Middle East. From 2020 to today, Biden White House officials and members of the U.S. military have asked for funds to be transferred from the Middle East to other American bases in Africa, Europe, and the South China sea, while radical Islamic terrorist groups have received ample amounts of funding from Iran, Russia, and China. During the 2020 election, President Biden vowed to move troops out of areas like Afghanistan and reduce America’s military presence, resulting in terrorist groups like the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, limiting the U.S’. ability to monitor Iran next door. Should the U.S. continue to withdraw its influence and presence in the Middle East, experts warn that regional allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel are on their own in defending themselves. As a result of the President’s policies, Saudi Arabia has felt that the U.S. is no longer a trusted ally, given that the administration has repeatedly attempted to court Iran’s regime in efforts of resigning a nuclear program while overlooking their support for terrorism.
Replacement theory is alive in the Islamic takeover of Europe Giulio Meotti
Islam is replacing both Christianity in Belgium and atheism in Sweden in a weakened West. Op-ed.
Mar 15, 2023, 7:09 PM (GMT+2) – “It was the week before Xmas, midday on a mild, almost hot Monday, and the muezzins of West London were chanting the glory of Allah and how there was no God but Him…”. Thus opens “1985”, the prophetic novel by Anthony Burgess, the author of “A Clockwork Orange”. He wrote it in 1978 and it looks like the portrait of Europe in 2023…
The Islamic call to prayer (Adhan) is now resounding in Stockholm, reports Samnytt news. The Adhan was recorded in the capital. In Sweden, three mosques have received permission from the authorities to use loudspeakers to broadcast prayers in Botkyrka, Karlskrona and Växjö. But no permits for Muslim prayer calls have been issued in Stockholm. Despite this, Swedes in the capital have repeatedly witnessed the Adhan being imposed on non-Muslims.
Sweden had 8 percent Muslims in 2016. In 2050 it will have 11 percent Muslims if immigration stops completely, but up to 21 percent if it remains “normal”, and 31 percent if it continues at the same pace of the last years.
And further on? According to an academic analysis by Professor Kyösti Tarvainen, in just over a generation Muslims will be the majority in Sweden.
[Ed.: Imbeciles! (Not as bad as us, but still...)] 
Douglas Macgregor: NATO Only Back Off When Ukraine Is Completely Destroyed [15:13]
If the System Is Collapsing Should We Let It? By Jim Hoft
Mar. 14, 2023 7:15 am – The United States might survive another 10 years, but the crises will increase in both frequency and intensity until the end. And, as Steve Bannon has said since Friday night, this is not your fault.
You did not drive the dot com bubble.
You did not cause the 2008 financial collapse.
You did not impose Covid lockdowns or toss cash from helicopters for three years.
You got a job, paid your bills, and saved what you could.
You moved to good school districts so your kids could get into a college with a name people recognize.
You painted your porch and upgraded your windows and tried to keep up your lawn.
But the people with advanced degrees from those well-known universities did none of that. They played you like a sucker. They schmoozed your Congressman for special treatment and federal dollars. They bought a drink for a Senator in Jefferson City and got tax freedom for a generation. They took your savings and lost it on casino bets. And, now, they’re demanding you cover their losses.
The rich and powerful are coming to you and me for handouts for a very simple reason: there are many more of us than there are of them.
The elites think there’s strength in their exclusivity. And they’re right—until the uninvited, the unwashed masses, get fed up. Exclusivity is powerful until the plebes no longer care about the consequences of taking them down.
In the TV series Billions, a character made an astute observation: the only thing more dangerous than a man with unlimited means is a man with nothing to lose.
The uninsured depositors at SVB are men of unlimited resources. You and I are men with nothing to lose.
The sooner you realize there are 10 million of us losers for every 1 elite winner, the sooner we can even the score and end this nonsense.
You see, here’s the new problem Rabbi Prof. Dov Fischer
If the democratically elected government of Israel capitulates on judicial reform now, other than agreeing to cosmetic compromises, know that the putsch will not stop with judicial reform. Op-ed.
Mar 13, 2023, 8:17 AM (GMT+2) – I have written previously regarding the judicial-reform issues for which there is no room to compromise. That article is foundational to my legal and Judaic thinking on the matter, as I contemplate some of the compromises now floating around. For example:
1. A judiciary must be fair and balanced. The current Israeli Supreme Court is corrupt and imbalanced, and has been since Aharon Barak took off his mask and made it into a tyranny of the Left thirty years ago. Therefore, because politics is cyclical, one approach to getting a more balanced court is the American way: to allow elected governments to select the judges. That way, when Democrats and the Left are elected, their president and senate select and confirm their judges, and then the Republicans and the Right get their chance to balance it all when they win. It keeps bouncing back and forth in cycles.
If the Israeli Left now wants judicial democracy like America, that would see Israel’s judges named by the elected prime minister and approved by the elected Knesset. That is exactly the American system. Begin names judges approved by Likud. Then Rabin gets his day. Then Shamir. Then Peres. Then Bibi. Then Barak. Etc.
Leftist Israelis do not realize (nor presently care) that the American system has many flaws. To put it mildly, they are no Sanhedrin. American Leftist courts make up their own laws out of thin air, like Roe v. Wade which falsely “discovered” abortion as a Constitutional right even though everyone, including the justices who fabricated it, knew it did not actually exist in the Constitution. Eventually, the Right’s political cycle came, and a more conservative Court ultimately threw out Roe v. Wade. See how it all balanced? It took only 49 years to overturn. Nice and smooth, except for predictable death threats by the Left against the conservative justices. The only fall-out is that 63 million lives were aborted, 63 million souls snuffed out during the interim. That’s all. Truth, Justice, and the American Way.
So the American system is not so great either. The U.S. Supreme Court approved slavery (Dred Scott), separate facilities for Blacks to keep them away from racist Whites (Plessy v. Ferguson), denial of basic rights to Chinese immigrants who could not even become American citizens until 1953, mass incarcerations of innocent Japanese Americans (Korematsu), and other such. All those eventually were overturned, but only after decades of great damage inflicted on millions of victims through several generations.
