COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]
Is the Israeli government antisemitic? Of course! Just as the US government is anti-American, the UK government is anti-British, and the Japanese government is anti-Japanese (and so on, worldwide) MARK CRISPIN MILLER
AUG 7, 2023 – Check out the latest figures on excess mortality and disability from all four countries.
Jay Bonnar’s anecdote is statistically impossible if the COVID vaccines are safe STEVE KIRSCH
Jay lost 15 of his friends who all “died suddenly.” All were vaccinated. Four dropped dead within 24 hours of the shot. 3 of the 4 were ~30 years old, perfectly healthy before their death. Whoa.
AUG 7, 2023 – High tech sales executive Jay Bonnar, age 57, had 15 of his direct friends (not “friends of friends”) die unexpectedly since the COVID vaccine rolled out. All his friends who died were vaccinated. In his entire life, he’s never had any friends die unexpectedly. Zero. If the vaccines are safe, the chances of this happening are near zero. In other words, Jay’s experience is proof that the vaccines are causing people to die unexpectedly. Think I’m wrong? Where is your anecdote showing that the unvaccinated are dying unexpectedly at the same rate as the vaccinated? Surely, those anecdotes should be TRIVIAL to find, right?
Executive summary
Most people who call themselves “scientists” are dismissive of anecdotes, especially if the numbers are small (such as less than 20). They are fond of educating people that “the plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.”
This is simply untrue. In fact, it is misinformation.
A single, independently-verifiable anecdote can be extremely powerful. It can totally destroy the scientific consensus and prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the CDC is lying.
I’m going to show you an example of this in this article.
Anthony Fauci’s Deceptions By David Zweig
A trove of emails, Slack messages, and other documents reveal Fauci’s behind-the-scenes involvement. ‘Tony doesn’t want his fingerprints on origin stories.’
August 7, 2023 – On April 17, 2020, with much of the country still in some form of lockdown and news of overwhelmed hospitals dominating the headlines, Dr. Anthony Fauci, then a member of the President’s Coronavirus Task Force, was asked a question toward the end of a White House press briefing: Was there a possibility that this novel virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China?
“There was a study recently,” Fauci said confidently, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in bats as they evolve, and the mutations that it took to get to where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.” In other words, it wasn’t from the lab.
This moment set the template for much that would follow from Fauci over the next three years. That is, evasion, deception, and misdirection about his support of high-risk virology research and its connection to the possibility that a lab leak in Wuhan caused a worldwide catastrophe.
Fauci, who was the face of the public health community during the crisis, pushed the idea that the evidence strongly indicated that the virus was just a tragic, natural occurrence. He insisted, repeatedly, that an epidemic that started in Wuhan was unlikely to have been the result of an escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
But Fauci had an incentive to arrive at his conclusion about the deadly pandemic that started in Wuhan. The WIV was known for doing high-risk virology research studying and manipulating coronaviruses. Fauci, as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for almost 40 years, had funded such research at the WIV.
Fauci’s posture—dismissive toward the theory of the lab leak, and later, condescending toward those who entertained it—set what became the accepted narrative about the origins of the pandemic. It was a narrative that was parroted by the government, public health officials, and the media, and even enforced by social media platforms at the request of the Biden White House.
But last month, a trove of explosive emails and other documents were released by the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. These revealed evidence of Fauci’s and other officials’ behind-the-scenes involvement with scientists and journalists, demonstrating their efforts to quash the lab leak theory.
[Ed.:
The spike protein, ACE-2, cysteine content and redox shifts – Part I JESSICA ROSE
The power of antioxidants and what they actually do in the context of COVID-19
AUG 7, 2023
Prologue
This article took me a long time to write because I needed to learn, and relearn, a lot of chemistry. I am a biologist, not a chemist by ‘trade’ (I felt a little out of my ‘element’ here – hardy har har) but when it comes to living systems, so many of our fields and subject matters are integral parts of each other. It also took me extra time because my original intention – to simply review a specific journal article – got somewhat railroaded, primarily because I don’t think the article is readily ‘consumable’ by the average reader even if that reader does have a science background. I realized along the way that it wasn’t going to be as easy as summarizing points raised by the authors, and that I would have to go quite deep into the fundamentals of chemistry in order to have any chance of conveying a meaningful biological message.
For me, it’s not enough to just say ‘take antioxidants’. I want my readers to understand why they should take antioxidants, if it is suggested. I want my readers to understand what an antioxidant actually is and does. I want to understand what an antioxidant actually is and does!
My hope for this article is to pick out (and apart) the most important points made in this and other related articles, and to very clearly define why certain people fair better than others with regard to COVID-19 pathology severity (and pretty much all ‘diseases’ and disorders, including cancer) in the context of redox reactions and the environment that pre-determines such things as binding events, in the first place. I have also decided to make it a multi-part series. The amount of important information to convey is too large, and too important, for a single article.
Belfast Cardiac Surgeon Dies Suddenly During Cycling Trip in France ANDREAS OEHLER
What were the odds?
AUG 7, 2023 – “Belfast cardiac surgeon dies suddenly during cycling trip in France” (Belfast Telegraph, 2023.08.01):
Simon MacGowan split his time between Bray and Northern Ireland. He was part of a group who set off on a holiday cycle across the French Alps, enjoying several days together on their bikes before reaching their destination of Nice over the weekend, where sadly Mr MacGowan suddenly passed away overnight.
So, not even “during cycling trip”, just when “relaxing” afterwards? Could it be related to the propensity of Irish healthcare workers to inject indiscriminately? “Healthcare workers in Ireland have highest rate of the Covid-19 booster vaccination” (Irish Medical Times, 2022.05.09):
[Ed.: And that man was a ‘Doctor’!]
Cardiac Mortality Up During 28 Days after COVID-19 Vaccination in Self-Controlled Studies from England, Italy, United States PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD
Cardiac Fatalities Jump up for a Month After the Shot
AUG 7, 2023 – Because such large populations took COVID-19 vaccines, it is hard to see secular trends after injection. One method is to take a group where follow-up is assured for a prolonged period and then go back and look at what happened during a shorted period of time after exposure.
Marchand et al, found three self-controlled cohorts where the first 28 days after injection could be critically examined after COVID-19 vaccination. Compared to the longer-term of observation over 25 months, the first 28 days carried a pooled hazard ratio (HR) suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination is associated with an increased risk of cardiac-related mortality (HR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.11], p = .007). Subgroup analysis showed that male gender is significantly associated with increased risks of cardiac mortality (HR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15],= .006).
Excess Crude Morality: DEATHVAX™ Germany Edition 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
AUG 7, 2023 – Last month this Substack covered the horror show US data:
·JUL 9 – Today we will review the latest excess crude mortality coming out of Germany:
VAERS data is crystal clear: The COVID vaccines are killing an estimated 1 person per 1,000 doses (676,000 dead Americans) STEVE KIRSCH
AUG 6, 2023 – It takes about 30 seconds to do a VAERS query that shows the COVID vaccines are deadly. The shape of the “onset curve” makes this obvious. An estimated 676,000 Americans have been killed.
Executive summary
72% of the IUS death reports in the 33 year history of VAERS are from one vaccine: the COVID-19 vaccine.
Unlike other vaccines, the COVID vaccines keep on killing people, for months and years after the shot.
The statistics I’ve been able to collect estimate that the COVID vaccines kill 1 person per 1,000 doses. These vaccines aren’t close to safe, so we don’t even have to get into a discussion as to whether they are effective.
They are clearly unsafe and nobody should be taking them.
And we can prove that with one VAERS query which nobody can explain away. Anyone can replicate this themselves.
How the current version of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty (aka Bureau Text) encourages rather than prevents pandemics MERYL NASS
AUG 5, 2023 – Weapons of Mass Destruction: Chem Bio
Traditionally, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) were Chemical, Biological, Radiologic and Nuclear (CBRN).
The people of the world don’t want them used on us—they are cheap ways to kill and maim lots of people at once. And so international treaties were created to try to prevent their development (sometimes) and use. First was the Geneva Protocol of 1925, banning the use of biological and chemical weapons in war. The US and many nations signed it, but it took 50 years for the US to ratify it, so we believed we were not bound by it.
The US used chemical weapons subsequently. The US probably used biological weapons in the Korean War, and perhaps in Vietnam, which experienced an odd outbreak of plague during the war. The use of napalm, white phosphorus, agent orange (with its dioxin excipient causing massive numbers of birth defects and other tragedies) and possibly other chemical weapons led to much pushback, especially since we had signed the Geneva Protocol and we were supposed to be a civilized nation.
