Daily Shmutz | HEALTH | 10/12/2023

Health 

[Ed.:  Although this is an ad, the (long) video with Teddy Daniels about the coming food shortage is interesting and important. Important information in the first part, ad at the end.]

Gov’t Bans Stockpiling

 

BOMBSHELL: Major Cities Are Now Uninhabitable Due to 5G Radiation     2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

OCT 10, 2023 – AnyCity, North America/EU/UK

Toronto, a bustling metropolis, thrives as one of the epicenters of technological advancement in North America. Yet, like with all tech hub cities with ever increasing interconnectivity thanks to the ongoing 5G revolution, there are mounting concerns about potential health risks associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

Investigation of Toronto’s RF Landscape

Using the Trifield Meter — a device designed to measure RF radiation— RF levels across various neighborhoods of Toronto were investigated.

For context, safety standards indicate that readings between 0.2 mW/m2 and 1 mW/m2 are considered “safe.” The findings were both eye-opening, and deeply alarming:

  1. City Core:  In the heart of Toronto, the readings consistently hovered above 20 mW/m2, a 20-times increase over the safe upper limit.
  2. City Core Outskirts: Once outside the dense city core, the readings drop closer to safe levels, albeit still high at around 1.0-8 mW/m2.
  3. Proximity to Cell Towers: Near buildings with cell tower masts, the readings skyrocketed to an astonishing 20 W/m2 — 20,000 times the suggested low-safe level!
  4. Inside City Buildings: Buildings with cell tower masts presented varied readings, ranging from 2 mW/m2 to a staggering 20 mW/m2; so, even the lowest reading was double the safe upper limit.

What can be done about this excessive, cancer-inducing RF radiation, and the huge rates of turbo cancers caused by the COVID-19 slow kill bioweapon “vaccinations?”

Historically, studies have raised serious health concerns associated with prolonged exposure to high RF radiation levels. For instance, a study by Eger et al. in Germany found that people living within 400 meters of cell towers had over three times the normal rate of certain cancers. Similarly, an Israeli study (Wolf and Wolf) reported a nearly fourfold increase in cancer risks for those residing within 350 meters of an RF tower.

The 5G Implication

5G technology uses higher frequency waves that promise faster data transfers, but also necessitate more towers due to the shorter wavelength and, therefore, shorter range of the signal. This means more potential exposure points, especially in urban areas such as Toronto. Our readings from the Trifield Meter experiment seem to underscore this concern, with massively elevated RF radiation levels in the city core and near cell towers.

A Balance Between Progress and Health

While 5G promises a brighter, faster, more interconnected future, the potential health risks cannot be overstated. Toronto’s dense RF landscape, as evidenced by the Trifield Meter readings, suggests that we might be on the precipice of a public health disaster.

City planners, governments, telecommunication companies, and residents must come together to better understand the implications, and seek balanced solutions. We must ask ourselves: Is the price of faster data worth compromising our health by exposing ourselves to enormously higher risk of dying from cancer within a few years of continuous exposure?

Keep in mind that 5G was surreptitiously rolled out during the second quarter of 2020, when the populations of most countries were under lockdowns.  [Emphasis added.]

[Ed.: We must remember that all the jabbed bodies contain graphine oxide, silver particles, and mRNA spike protein gene mutation  (Read: it replaces your original God given DNA). These bodies become transmitter/receptors with their controllers/creators. So, they can be eliminated at any time they program it (read: removed from the planet.)

We must also remember that those who are fully jabbed and boosted can and do ‘shed’ (or somehow transmit) to un-jabbed, healthy people electromagnetically.]

Total Page Visits: 91
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.