HEALTH
Two Types of People Who Should Never Get the Flu Shot Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 17, 2023
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Secondary infections such as pneumonia and other respiratory diseases, as well as sepsis, are included in “influenza death” statistics, and account for a majority of deaths attributed to influenza every year
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data have repeatedly demonstrated that the flu vaccine does not work for seniors. The 2018/2019 flu vaccines against influenza A and B viruses had an adjusted effectiveness rating of just 12% for those over age 65
- Studies have also demonstrated that influenza vaccination has little or no impact on mortality among the elderly
- The flu vaccine is routinely recommended for all pregnant women during any trimester, yet some scientific evidence suggests it could place their pregnancy at risk. Research funded by the CDC found an association between flu vaccination during pregnancy and an eightfold risk of miscarriage
- Injury following influenza vaccination is now the most compensated claim in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, a total of 5,407 injury claims for flu vaccine were filed
CDC: Blood Clots and Travel – What You Need to Know EMERGENCY MESSAGE SYSTEM
Blood Clots and Travel: What You Should Know
October 16, 2023 – More than 300 million people travel on long-distance flights (generally more than four hours) each year. Blood clots, also called deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can be a serious risk for some long-distance travelers. Most information about blood clots and long-distance travel comes from information that has been gathered about air travel. However, anyone traveling more than four hours, whether by air, car, bus, or train, can be at risk for blood clots.
[Ed.: Although this is an ad, the (long) video with Teddy Daniels about the coming food shortage is interesting and important. Important information in the first part, ad at the end.]
BOMBSHELL: Major Cities Are Now Uninhabitable Due to 5G Radiation 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
OCT 10, 2023 – AnyCity, North America/EU/UK
Toronto, a bustling metropolis, thrives as one of the epicenters of technological advancement in North America. Yet, like with all tech hub cities with ever increasing interconnectivity thanks to the ongoing 5G revolution, there are mounting concerns about potential health risks associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
Investigation of Toronto’s RF Landscape
Using the Trifield Meter — a device designed to measure RF radiation— RF levels across various neighborhoods of Toronto were investigated.
For context, safety standards indicate that readings between 0.2 mW/m2 and 1 mW/m2 are considered “safe.” The findings were both eye-opening, and deeply alarming:
- City Core: In the heart of Toronto, the readings consistently hovered above 20 mW/m2, a 20-times increase over the safe upper limit.
- City Core Outskirts: Once outside the dense city core, the readings drop closer to safe levels, albeit still high at around 1.0-8 mW/m2.
- Proximity to Cell Towers: Near buildings with cell tower masts, the readings skyrocketed to an astonishing 20 W/m2 — 20,000 times the suggested low-safe level!
- Inside City Buildings: Buildings with cell tower masts presented varied readings, ranging from 2 mW/m2 to a staggering 20 mW/m2; so, even the lowest reading was double the safe upper limit.
What can be done about this excessive, cancer-inducing RF radiation, and the huge rates of turbo cancers caused by the COVID-19 slow kill bioweapon “vaccinations?”
Historically, studies have raised serious health concerns associated with prolonged exposure to high RF radiation levels. For instance, a study by Eger et al. in Germany found that people living within 400 meters of cell towers had over three times the normal rate of certain cancers. Similarly, an Israeli study (Wolf and Wolf) reported a nearly fourfold increase in cancer risks for those residing within 350 meters of an RF tower.
The 5G Implication
5G technology uses higher frequency waves that promise faster data transfers, but also necessitate more towers due to the shorter wavelength and, therefore, shorter range of the signal. This means more potential exposure points, especially in urban areas such as Toronto. Our readings from the Trifield Meter experiment seem to underscore this concern, with massively elevated RF radiation levels in the city core and near cell towers.
A Balance Between Progress and Health
While 5G promises a brighter, faster, more interconnected future, the potential health risks cannot be overstated. Toronto’s dense RF landscape, as evidenced by the Trifield Meter readings, suggests that we might be on the precipice of a public health disaster.
City planners, governments, telecommunication companies, and residents must come together to better understand the implications, and seek balanced solutions. We must ask ourselves: Is the price of faster data worth compromising our health by exposing ourselves to enormously higher risk of dying from cancer within a few years of continuous exposure?
Keep in mind that 5G was surreptitiously rolled out during the second quarter of 2020, when the populations of most countries were under lockdowns. [Emphasis added.]
[Ed.: We must remember that all the jabbed bodies contain graphine oxide, silver particles, and mRNA spike protein gene mutation (Read: it replaces your original God given DNA). These bodies become transmitter/receptors with their controllers/creators. So, they can be eliminated at any time they program it (read: removed from the planet.)
We must also remember that those who are fully jabbed and boosted can and do ‘shed’ (or somehow transmit) to un-jabbed, healthy people electromagnetically.]
