COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]
THEY LIED TO YOU: New Study Finds People Who Took Ivermectin for COVID Recovered Faster – As TGP Reported Over Two Years Ago! By Jim Hoft
Mar. 8, 2024 11:20 am – In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin that “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.
This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015 and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.
As The Gateway Pundit reported for years now – There have been over 101 scientific studies on Ivermectin that confirmed the significant benefit of taking the drug in treating COVID-19 in its early stages.
The science is undeniable.
Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19. And the government is now responsible for killing tens of thousands of Americans who did not have to die.
Fast forward to today…
Another new study found that people who received Ivermectin were much better off than those who did not take the drug.
The Epoch Times and ZeroHedge reported:
People who tested positive for COVID-19 and took ivermectin as a treatment recovered faster than a comparison group, a new study found.
The time to self-reported recovery was a median of two days faster among the ivermectin recipients, according to the large UK study.
The quicker recovery period was statistically significant.
People who received ivermectin were also less likely to be hospitalized or die, with 1.6 percent of ivermectin recipients being hospitalized or dying versus 4 percent of the comparison group, which received typical care, which in the UK is largely focused on managing symptoms.
Ivermectin recipients also enjoyed a reduction of severe symptoms and sustained recovery, according to the study.
The paper was published by the Journal of Infection on Feb. 29.
The study covered an open-label trial that involved 2,157 ivermectin recipients and 3,256 who received typical care from June 23, 2021, to July 1, 2022. Participants were randomized and reported symptoms and recovery.
So will those individuals who kept this drug from Americans ever be prosecuted for their crime?
FDA findings at Moderna Covid-19 vaccine facility, highlight issues like improperly cleaned equipment, the use of expired materials, and insufficient measures to minimize contamination risks THE CANADIAN INDEPENDENT
MAR 8, 2024 – An access to information request reveals an FDA inspection of Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine facility showed “improperly cleaned equipment, the use of expired materials during manufacturing, and a lack of design in both the equipment and facility to minimize the potential for contamination.”
Documents obtained through an access to information request reveal some alarming findings after a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection at Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine manufacturing facility in Norwood, Massachusetts, conducted between September 11th and 21st, 2023.
According to the FDA report, under observation one, it states, “Equipment used for drug substance manufacturing is not cleaned properly prior to its usage.” It further notes, “Specifically, your firm does not ensure that the equipment used for drug substance manufacturing is appropriately cleaned before the manufacturing of mRNA-1273 drug substance.”
Observation three states, “Separate or defined areas to prevent mix-ups are deficient,” and explains that “Expired materials were found utilized beyond their expiration date, and restricted materials were utilized in mRNA drug substance production.”
Observation five found that Moderna’s “Equipment and facilities are not designed to minimize the potential for contamination,” and highlighted that “Specifically, the air handling systems were not adequately designed and controlled to ensure appropriate air quality in the Grade C cleanroom in which mRNA drug substances are manufactured.”
You can review the documents here.
Trump Makes a Statement on COVID Vaccines, Brags About Nine Month Approval Time IGOR CHUDOV
Are you Tired of Winning Yet?
MAR 8, 2024 – Trump released the following statement on Truth Social, responding to Joe Biden’s State of the Union:
In the TruthSocial post above, Trump mentioned his nine-month approval time for Covid vaccines.
I am frankly shocked by the stupidity of both statements.
The vaccines did not “save us from the pandemic” – they made the pandemic worse. And being proud that such vaccines were pushed through in just nine months is perhaps a bit misguided.
[Ed.: ‘Warp Speed’? Nobody’s perfect after all…
At Last! A new bill in Congress to hold Big Pharma companies responsible for Covid vaccine injuries! CHERIE ZASLAWSKI
Hats off to Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, for authoring this bill!
MAR 7, 2024 – While so many of us have been sounding the alarm over the experimental mRNA Covid “vaccines” and fighting localized battles as we were able, Rep. Chip Roy’s bill may be the colossal breakthrough we’ve all been praying for!
Not only would it be a godsend to the many thousands who’ve been badly injured by these novel injections, but it also loudly proclaims to the entire nation that these vaccines were not, and are not, safe!
Chip Roy is one brave man. His quote below says it all:
“I am introducing the LIABLE Act to empower Americans to remove crony federal liability protections for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and empower injured Americans. The American people deserve justice for the infringement on their personal medical freedom and those medically harmed deserve restitution.” (Emphasis mine)
Gotta now watch his back!
Here’s more from an Epoch Times article: Proposed legislation introduced on March 5 would strip COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers of liability protections, enabling U.S. residents injured by the vaccines to sue the companies.
The bill, proposed by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), would retroactively remove protections from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers. (Emphasis mine)
The bill itself reads as follows: “No federal law … may make the manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine immune from suit or liability, or limit the liability of such a manufacturer, with respect to claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a COVID-19 vaccine.”
34 Deaths, 302 Serious Injuries: RSV Vaccines Aren’t Even a Year Old but Some Experts Say It’s Time to Pull Them From the Market By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Newly approved vaccines for respiratory syncytial virus have been linked to deaths and serious injuries and, most recently, to Guillain-Barré syndrome, but U.S. health officials continue to recommend them as “safe and effective.”
03/05/24 – It’s been less than a year since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended two new respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines — yet CDC data and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) already show reports of 34 deaths, 302 serious adverse events and according to news reports this week, a safety signal for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
Reported cases include several instances of severe adverse events in newborns, including the death of a 27-day-old baby who was wrongly administered the vaccine, and in pregnant women and people in age groups for which the RSV vaccines were not approved.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Pfizer’s Abrysvo and GSK’s Arexvy RSV vaccines for adults ages 60 and older — but not for children or babies.
Abrysvo is also approved for pregnant women, targeting RSV prevention in babies. The FDA approved Abrysvo and Arexvy in May 2023.
According to CDC data, approximately 9.65 million RSV vaccine doses — 6.58 million Arexvy doses and 3.06 million Abrysvo doses — were administered as of Feb. 16.
Members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) presented the data on deaths and adverse events related to the RSV vaccines at a Feb. 29 meeting.
Yet, ACIP — and news media reports — primarily focused on GBS safety signals, glossing over deaths and the administration of the vaccines to unauthorized age groups.
Instead, CDC officials claimed it’s too early to determine if the RSV vaccines caused the adverse events and reiterated that the shots are safe, according to The Associated Press (AP).
Experts who spoke with The Defender disputed the CDC’s reassurances. Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said “34 deaths in 10 months should be sufficient to pull the RSV vaccines from the market. But the FDA will not do that — nor will there be full investigations regarding these deaths.”
“I am greatly concerned with the excessive application of the RSV vaccine,” said cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. “We are beginning to see the tip of the iceberg in terms of serious side effects.”
Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles are in COVID Vaccines; a new report says they are safe for humans….They are lying! DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
MAR 4, 2024 – SciTechDaily calls graphene oxide nanoparticles a “wonder material” that is now “verified safe” in humans by new research.1 It further declares graphene oxide is, in bold, “A revolutionary nanomaterial with huge potential to tackle multiple global challenges could be developed further without acute risk to human health, research suggests.”
Imagine that—graphene oxide nanoparticles are “without acute risk to human health.” That would suggest it’s harmless in vaccines, at least in the short run. The medical-industrial-military complex seems bent on proving graphene oxide nanoparticles are safe — perhaps because
critical researchers have discovered them hidden in COVID “vaccines.”2
The defenders of graphene oxide nanoparticles are handicapped in making safety claims because a motherload of research going back many years finds graphene oxide and nanoparticles in general are harmful to multiple body organs, to cells, and even to life itself across a spectrum of species.
The actual research study3 that supposedly proved the safety of inhaled graphene oxide nanoparticles was published in Nature Nanotechnology in 2024. It reports and dismisses the importance of their own findings: That the blood of the volunteers who inhaled graphene nanoparticles consistently caused clotting (thrombosis) when passed through arteries removed from people with pre-existing heart disease.
Here is what the research scientists themselves conclude:
The magnitude of the greater thrombogenicity after GO [graphene oxide nanoparticles] exposure was relatively mild and would be potentially of limited consequence, even in patients with pre-existing heart disease. Nevertheless, we recommend that characterization of the thrombogenic potential is included in experimental models used to develop risk assessments for graphene materials that may be of higher risk, or to consider higher exposure scenarios. [Emphasis added]
The authors have no right to draw such benign conclusions, declaring that it would be safe “even in patients with pre-existing heart disease.” As noted above, the danger signs came from testing the blood of the volunteers who had inhaled graphene oxide on cardiac arteries taken from patients with heart disease. The conclusion should be that it is especially dangerous in patients with pre-existing heart disease.
Given the surfacing of this risk in a very small study of humans, no further human studies and no commercial use of inhaled graphene nanoparticles should be allowed until further animal studies investigate this risk.
To add to these concerns, thrombosis is one of the tragic outcomes of the COVID genetic jabs, which release graphene oxide nanoparticles into the cells and the blood along with the genetic material.
The corruption of science today makes science entirely unreliable, in this case, whether we are reading a commentary in a science magazine or the research study itself.
[Ed.: If we had followed the science, we wouldn’t have gotten jabbed…]
Project NextGen – Disease X & the COVID Jabs Part 2 Tom Renz
What is Project NextGen?
MAR 3, 2024 – Disease X is coming. The WHO has told us, our federal government has told us, we are spending money planning it… it’s just happening. Given the continued funding for gain of function work I believe Disease X will be a laboratory created virus just like COVID (I’m not arguing this here – feel free to refer to our lawsuit against EcoHealth Alliance, the Senate and House findings, Fauci’s FOIA’d emails, and the endless other reports demonstrating this to be truth). Given the fact that Disease X seems to be inevitable, the question becomes what happens then.
I believe that after the outbreak we will see a similar reaction globally to what we saw with COVID. A fear campaign, hospital murder protocols, attempts to lockdown, masking, etc. None of these actions will prevent death (some will have the opposite affect) but they will drive people to and justify the new generation of gene therapy poisons which will make big pharma and their globalist owners more rich while continuing to destroy the wealth of we the people.
On May 9, 2023, President Biden’s administration announced Project NextGen – the successor to Operation Warp Speed, a federal effort to expedite the development and distribution of Covid vaccines. It appears our government intends to continue with the precedent of rushing vaccines – for our health and safety, of course. With an initial investment of $5 billion, Project NextGen aims to “accelerate and streamline the rapid development of the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments through public-private collaborations. [Emphasis added]
[Ed.:
BREAKING: 4x Vaccinated Youth 318% More Likely to Die Than Unvaxxed Peers, Office for National Statistics Confirms by The Exposé
MAR 3, 2024 – In a recent dataset released by the UK Government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), a surprising pattern has emerged regarding mortality rates per 100,000 in teenagers and young adults, sparking a wave of questions and calls for further investigation from public health experts.
The ONS dataset, available on the ONS website here, details deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023. Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking.
Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
In every single month, four-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers and young adults. The same can also be said for one-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults, and two-dose vaccinated teens and young adults in February 2023.
CDC Downgrades COVID to Same Severity as the Flu… But Says You Must Keep Having Vaccines By Ben Kew
Mar. 2, 2024 7:15 am – The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has downgraded the severity of the Chinese coronavirus to the same status as the flu, calling for a “unified approach” to treating such conditions.
In a press release on Friday, the CDC announced it was simplifying its recommendations for treating COVID because the virus no longer presents a significant threat.
The release stated:
CDC released today updated recommendations for how people can protect themselves and their communities from respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.
The new guidance brings a unified approach to addressing risks from a range of common respiratory viral illnesses, such as COVID-19, flu, and RSV, which can cause significant health impacts and strain on hospitals and health care workers.
CDC is making updates to the recommendations now because the U.S. is seeing far fewer hospitalizations and deaths associated with COVID-19 and because we have more tools than ever to combat flu, COVID, and RSV.
CDC Director Dr. Mandy Cohen said that the announcement “reflects the progress we have made in protecting against severe illness from COVID-19.”
[Ed.:
