Daily Shmutz | COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery | 9/10/24

COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.:  FEAR YOUR DOCTOR!  Medicine is a disgraced profession.  They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia.  Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?]

 

What Happened to Trump’s 63 Million Doses of Hydroxychloroquine?  ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

By Dr. David Gortler, introduction and context by Dr. Robert Malone

SEP 10, 2024

“The modern nation-state, in whatever guise, is a dangerous and unmanageable institution, presenting itself on the one hand as a bureaucratic supplier of goods and services, which is always about to, but never actually does, give its clients value for money — and on the other as a repository of sacred values, which from time to time invites one to lay down one’s life on its behalf. . . . it is like being asked to die for the telephone company.” –Alasdair MacIntyre

“The general public is being reduced to a state where people not only are unable to find out about the truth, but also become unable to search for the truth because they are satisfied with deception and trickery that have determined their convictions, satisfied with a fictitious reality created by design through the abuse of language.” — Alasdair MacIntyre

In the context of COVID, although most associate me with speaking out in opposition to the gene therapy technology-based Spike vaccines (adenovirus and mRNA-based), at the beginning of the COVID crisis through into 2022 I was mainly focused on identifying, repurposing, and clinically testing existing drugs, and getting repurposed drugs and drug combinations for both hospital and outpatient use. Particularly notable was the role of my team and me in identifying and advocating for the use of the combination of Famotidine and Celecoxib +/- Ivermectin.

However, I was also very familiar with the data supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine. I vividly remember Dr. Peter Navarro calling one of my clients early in 2020 and trying to source additional doses. Dr. Zev Zelenko, whose early treatment protocol was based on use of Hydroxychloroquine, often sought my advice and once told me he considered me a mentor. I have personally met and spoken with esteemed French Professor Dr. Didier Raoult, who experienced one of the initial targeted COVID PsyWar attacks, for his work developing a treatment protocol combining hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. And I remember having to rapidly re-write a Famotidine clinical trial protocol to adapt to the declaration of hospital-restricted emergency use authorization for use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID.

What happened with the Trump/Navarro initiative involving stockpiling and deployment of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID is one of the most clear-cut and shocking case histories of globalized Deep/Administrative State and academic corruption combined with PsyWar deployment that I have ever encountered, and I had a front row seat for all of it. I know Rick Bright personally. I consider Peter Navarro a friend. I had a close, personal relationship with Dr. Zev Zelenko. I have never covered any of this in any podcast beyond the infamous Joe Rogan #1757 and this substack essay where I respond to an attack article regarding that podcast published by the Daily Mail.

In the following essay, Dr. Gortler provides a huge public service and homage to truth by exposing the fraud and malfeasance surrounding the demonization of the drug hydroxychloroquine during the COVIDcrisis.

This example of deployed PsyWar laid out by Dr. Gortler is incredible, as it shows the power of the administrative and deep state to coerce and bamboozle both a sitting president and his administration, as well as the American public, public health, and world governments.

How did this happen? In the Joe Rogan episode, I lay blame directly on Dr. Rick Bright (director of BARDA at the time), and Dr. Janet Woodcock (ex-acting director of the FDA). I stand by that. The real question is why and who or what corporation(s) were behind this?

When Rick was pushed out of his position as Director of BARDA (by Drs. Michael Callahan and Bob Kadlec), he landed an excellent, cushy job at the Rockefeller Institute. Who or what corporation drove the globally-coordinated smear campaign that attacked Trump, Navarro, Raoult, and anyone who advocated for early administration of hydroxychloroquine (+/- azithromycin or any other agent)?

I do remember asking (in 2020) CIA agent Dr. Michael Callahan about Raoult’s findings regarding hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and hearing him dismiss and smear both Raoult and the treatment without actually citing any data. Just bias. So I conclude from that experience that the CIA had some role in all of this sorry tale. The odd idea within the annotated DC insider elite seemed to be that only a specific anti-viral targeting SARS-CoV-2 could be clinically useful against the virus, rather than treating the symptoms of the disease.

Continue reading

 

Senator Johnson asks the FDA, CDC for data that will show the COVID vaccines are not safe   STEVE KIRSCH

Whoa. You are gonna LOVE this.

SEP 06, 2024

Executive summary

Senator Johnson is determined to expose the truth about the COVID vaccine. Because of that, he’s my favorite member of Congress, bar none.

He just sent an extraordinary letter to the CDC and FDA asking them for numbers that will reveal just how deadly these shots are.

You will love the letter he sent.

I can’t wait to hear their response.

Johnson’s letter

It’s all covered in this article which I urge you to read. Note: You can only see his letter if you are using a desktop browser.

Summary

The CDC and FDA always avoid commenting on other people’s data and analysis. That’s why Johnson asked them what the comparable US numbers are.

I can’t wait to see the reply.

If they are being honest, it should be “we don’t have a clue because we don’t collect the data here in the US.”

And that should be concerning to anyone with a working brain. We’ll be able to leverage anything they say.

If you like my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Thanks!

 

Flu Vaccines: All Risk and NO Benefit    BRUCHA WEISBERGER

Be smart and conduct a full investigation before an injection.

BS”D

SEP 05, 2024 – For many people, visiting their local pharmacy every fall for their annual flu shot is a ritual, one which they don’t stop to question.

But getting a flu shot should not be an “article of faith.”

Vaccination isn’t a commandment, is it?

There are major questions we should be asking:

•Is the flu vaccine effective at its stated goals of reducing hospitalization and death?

•Are there significant risks to getting the the flu vaccine?

•Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

In other words – do the shots work so well, and involve such minimal risk, that they create a net reduction in suffering and mortality? This is critical to know, as we certainly would not want to be increasing risk of serious illness or death.

Unfortunately, many people are getting flu vaccines automatically, not even thinking to question whether they actually work or not, nor whether they may cause very serious adverse effects.

🛑Does the flu shot prevent hospitalization and death?

Large bodies of evidence turn the common assumption on its head. Here are some key pieces:

•Robin Whittle, author of the nutritionmatters substack, highlights a fascinating 2020 study that was conducted on the data of over 7 million people in England and Wales spanning more than a decade, showing no benefit at all from flu shots – neither in hospital admission rates nor in death reduction – and if anything, negative efficacy (being vaccinated made things worse.) In fact, the findings were precise enough to discredit many previous studies.

Anderson et al. 2020 show that influenza vaccination of 60 to 70 year olds in England and Wales has no discernible positive impact on hospitalisation or deaths

Anderson et al. devised a powerful analysis based on an particular circumstance: In England and Wales, government policies lead to a very sharp rise in the proportion of people who are receive influenza vaccines once they turn 65.

Continue reading

[Ed.: Whoops:

EXCLUSIVE: Whistleblower and Combat Veteran ‘Unmasks the VA’s Unethical Experimentation’

 

Practice Management Tips for Spike Protein Illnesses  PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Dr. McCullough with Dr. Erica Williams

SEP 04, 2024 – Virtually every American has been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein either through COVID-19 infection or vaccination and because the vaccines are ineffective, for many they have had both exposures. As result the Spike protein and possibly the antibodies raised against it are producing a burden of disease never before seen in the clinic. This has been referred to by Parry et al as “spikeopathy.”

Academic medical centers have no grand rounds on the Spike protein. No management seminars. Big primary care CME operators such as PRIMED have ignored COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes. Thus doctors are drawing a blank when confronted with an obvious Spike protein blood clot or neurological problem.

I reached out to Dr. Erica Williams in Louisville, Kentucky to give us some insights into the Spike protein and the types of diseases she is now seeing in family practice. You will be amazed with her observations. Patients can help drive improvements in care by demanding antibody measurement to the Spike protein, risk stratification, and management specific to this abnormal protein as the cause of new illnesses.

Continue reading

 

COVID vaccinated kids are dying regularly from cardiac arrest   STEVE KIRSCH

It’s baffling that they try to normalize this as always happening. It was never a thing before the COVID vaccines rolled out.

SEP 04, 2024

Executive summary

VSRF’s Nurse Angela knows of 15 kids, under 20, who died from cardiac arrest. They were all vaccinated with the COVID vaccine.

I did a CDC Wonder search for ICD-10 code I46 which is cardiac arrest.

It shows that those under age 23 don’t die from cardiac arrest:

Today, it is the new normal if you’ve had the COVID shots.

Continue reading

 

If the COVID shots are so safe, then why have over 80% of NHS employees refused to take another booster?   STEVE KIRSCH

Former UK MP Andrew Bridgen just told me that over 80% of the NHS employees won’t take any more shots. I asked several AI models what this means.

SEP 03, 2024

Executive summary

The AI models all seem to agree that this is very troubling. It indicates that the COVID vaccines are not safe and effective, i.e., they lied to you.

Wow. Who would have guessed?

Read what the AI systems had to say.

ChatGPT

It’s a thought-provoking question, and it certainly raises valid concerns that need to be explored. The statistic you mention regarding NHS employees potentially refusing further COVID-19 boosters is indeed striking and could suggest a significant level of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals, who are often at the frontline of these public health measures.

The mainstream narrative typically promotes COVID-19 vaccines as being safe and effective, and for these vaccines, the regulatory bodies have given them emergency use authorization or full approval after assessing the risk-benefit ratio. However, the fact that a large percentage of health professionals may be opting out of additional boosters could indicate that their firsthand experience and observations might not align with the broader public messaging.

There could be several factors contributing to this phenomenon, and it’s important to consider them from multiple angles:

Adverse Effects and Observations: NHS employees, like other healthcare workers globally, have had unique insight into the immediate and short-term effects of the vaccines. They may be more acutely aware of any potential adverse effects, even those that are understated or underreported in official channels. This could contribute to a declining enthusiasm for further doses.

Questioning the Need for Boosters: As new variants of COVID-19 have emerged, the effectiveness of the original formulations of the vaccines against these variants has been called into question. If healthcare professionals perceive that the boosters are not providing significant additional protection, especially if they have already had previous doses, they might choose to forgo further shots.

Natural Immunity: Many healthcare workers have likely been exposed to the virus multiple times or have contracted COVID-19, potentially leading to natural immunity. There is ongoing debate in the scientific community about the durability and strength of natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity. Some may feel that their natural immunity is sufficient and thus may not see the need for additional vaccination.

Mistrust in Public Health Messaging: Throughout the pandemic, there has been a wide range of information and sometimes contradictory guidance from public health bodies. This inconsistency can erode trust, particularly among those who are supposed to be the most informed—healthcare workers. When trust diminishes, so does compliance with recommendations, even among medical professionals.

Vaccine Fatigue and Side Effects: The experience of side effects from previous shots, even if mild, can deter individuals from taking additional doses. The phenomenon of vaccine fatigue, especially in the context of a pandemic that has dragged on for years, could also play a role.

Continue reading

 

David Bell expands on the confirmed Moneypox numbers and the false emergency   MERYL NASS

BTW, It is only an STD if lesions are confined to the genital area.

SEP 01, 2024

https://brownstone.org/articles/mpox-numbers-and-reality/

So, here we are in 2024, on the tail of a massively profit-driving (and impoverishing) outbreak called Covid-19 that enabled the largest transfer of wealth from the many to the few in human history. The WHO’s announcement that 5,000 (or less) suspected Mpox cases is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) allows it to fast-track vaccines through its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) program, bypassing the normal rigor required to approve such pharmaceuticals, and is suggesting Pharma start lining up.

Did you catch that? By calling moneypox a PHEIC, vaccines that are not licensed in the country where they are to be used can be fast-tracked for use there, and presumably a liability waiver (as included in early version s of the IHR that were not passed) with be attached to their use.

Who wins when this foolish declaration is made?

  1. WHO
  2. The 3 manufacturers of moneypox vaccines (Bavarian Nordic, Emergent Biosolutions, and I do not know who will supply the unlicensed Japanese-developed vaccine). Bavarian Nordic and Emergent Biosolutions are both built on the back of biosecurity fear-porn, have no civilian business, and pump out dangerous products of no established value.
  3. the Biosecurity establishment

[Ed.:  Guess we really need to stop fucking monkeys!  Just give it up!]

 

There are only 4 ways to extract the truth from doctors about the harms caused by the COVID vaccines   STEVE KIRSCH

After 3 years of doing this, I’ve compiled a list of 4 methods to extract the truth about the safety and efficacy of the COVID shots.

SEP 01, 2024

Executive summary

Doctors have compelling stories. But fear and intimidation tactics keep them from speaking out.

There are 4 ways to extract the truth:

  1. Under oath in Congress
  2. Under oath in a court of law
  3. Press interview where the media relations department has consented to the interview
  4. Find retired doctors who don’t mind losing all their friends   [Emphasis added]

The first two methods are the most likely to elicit the truth, but it’s not a guarantee. Compliance can be as low as single digits.

The third method is the least effective, but can occasionally work as well. Making this more complicated of course is that the mainstream media just isn’t going to ask any questions.

I’m certain that within the next 12 months, we’ll see the truth start to come out since there are court cases which will reach the deposition stage at that point and I know doctors who have said that they will only tell the truth if forced to testify under oath. Otherwise, they will remain silent.

The four methods

There are are only two ways to extract the truth from doctors:

  1. Ask them to testify under oath in Congress
  2. Get them under oath in a deposition in a court case

Both cases are protected speech and cannot legally be used to remove their credentials or fire them.

However, these methods are not a guarantee. Even with those protections in place there are many people who will still lie because they are more afraid of the medical boards ending their careers than of being put in jail for perjury.

The third way which can also be used to extract the truth from a limited number of doctors is for the press to request an interview through the media relations department of the organization employing the doctor. The doctor still runs the risk of losing their medical license and board certifications by speaking the truth about what they observed.

The final way to find a retired doctor who doesn’t mind losing all his friends.

About my earlier military doctor post

I had to remove my post about observations from the military doctor I talked to because he was worried he would be put in prison for the rest of his life for talking to me without authorization.

Continue reading

 

RFK Jr. Calls for ‘Reckoning’ for ‘Immoral, Homicidal, Criminal Behavior’ During COVID-19 Pandemic  [3:56]   By Jim Hft

Sep. 1, 2024 1:40 pm – At the Limitless Expo, a gathering focused on financial freedom and strategic empowerment, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a powerful speech that reignited the debate over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kennedy didn’t mince words as he called for a reckoning for those responsible for what he described as “homicidal criminal behavior” during the pandemic.

Kennedy, who authored a controversial book about Anthony Fauci, used his platform at the expo to reiterate his claims against the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director.

“I wrote a book about Fauci. It’s a great book. There are 2,200 footnotes in the book… I invited people to find problems with the book… And nobody ever told us any factual error in that book,” Kennedy said.

He went on to accuse Fauci and other officials of using their positions to enforce “totalitarian controls that were not science-based,” arguing that their actions led to unnecessary deaths worldwide.

“It’s a story, really, of people involved in really terrible, immoral, homicidal criminal behavior,” he said.

One of the most explosive claims Kennedy made was about the suppression of COVID-19 treatments like Ivermectin.

He said that the FDA’s discouragement of such treatments was not based on science but on a desire to push the vaccine agenda.

“By depriving people of Ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe, died, and they didn’t need to,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy also touched on the rise in myocarditis cases among young people, particularly athletes, since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.

He cited alarming statistics, stating, “On average, it was, I think, 29 a month globally, athletes who died on the field. We’re getting down to hundreds a month now.”

In his conclusion, Kennedy warned that while the mainstream media has yet to fully acknowledge these issues, “the science is out there now, and it’s devastating.”

He called for accountability, stating, “There still has to be a reckoning.”

WATCH  

Continue reading

[Ed:

 

Most Variation in All-Cause Mortality Explained by Mass COVID-19 Vaccination   PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Australian Ecological Analysis Points to Vaccine Campaign Causing Rising Death Counts

SEP 01, 2024 – After a pandemic, all cause mortality should go down due to a culling effect of the frail and vulnerable. We saw acute COVID-19 become the proximate cause of death in many seniors who were in the final year of natural life.

Now an analysis from Allen indicates that all-cause mortality is up in heavily vaccinated Australia and that at least two thirds in the variation per region is explained by mass COVID-19 vaccination. There are numerous well-documented fatal vaccine serious adverse events which are piling up months and years after the shots. Cumulative toxicity is another factor as a single person is not vaccinated just with the primary series (first two injections), but continued dosing every six months.

These data call for a direct data merge of the vaccine administration and death data in Australia to explore these very uncomfortable relationships. Because the Australian government pushed the vaccines so hard, officials have been stonewalling the public on this important next analysis.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Allen, DE. 2024. The correlation between Australian Excess Deaths by State and Booster Vaccinations. Medical Research Archives, [online] 12(7). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v1 2i7.5485

 

LIFESAVING LABOR DAY SALE: Summer COVID Surge Shows We May Have to Return to 2020 SCAMDEMIC Measures   2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

Lockdowns and boosters incoming…

AUG 31, 2024 – The powers that be are becoming increasingly desperate as we rapidly careen toward the presidential election. The current slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” uptake is approaching zero, and BigPharma’s stocks are cratering. The untenable debt supercycle and global financial markets are more super-fragile than ever. The doomsday clock has never been closer to midnight than right now.

Meanwhile, the genetically modified humans are suffering from VAIDS, and a scamdemic coverup for all of the surging “vaccine” adverse events is long overdue. With decimated immune systems and severe chronic inflammation due to the cytotoxic spike proteins (SP2) that the “vaccinated” and their reprogrammed DNA are endogenously producing non-stop, even the common cold is now a potentially life threatening condition.

According to an article from the Mockingbird MSM outlet The Hill entitled, Summer COVID surge shows we may have to return to 2020 pandemic measuresthe VAIDS epidemic is gaining full steam heading straight into the upcoming flu season; to wit:

As summer 2024 draws to a close, the U.S. finds itself once again grappling with a surge in COVID-19 infections. 

With the majority of Americans “vaccinated,” we now have further proof that the “Safe and Effective” Modified mRNA poisons are anything but; in other words, we are only just getting started:

This wave has taken many people by surprise, particularly as the country has largely consigned the pandemic to the past. While public life has pretty much returned to pre-pandemic norms — something almost none of us would have believed in the summer of 2020 — the virus itself has not.

No vaccine injected into the shoulder could ever offer even a scintilla of protection for a respiratory disease, nor would it stop transmission, nor would it attenuate symptoms in the slightest; in fact, it is scientifically impossible to vaccinate against a flu season, or a gain of function “pandemic” at that. It is also impossible to vaccinate against a constantly mutating virus, since by the time the doses are distributed that viral strain is long gone.

Mutations of the virus continue to occur, and new variants are emerging, posing ongoing challenges to public health and safety. As we look ahead to the remainder of 2024 and into early 2025, we need to take stock of where we are, understand the factors driving this resurgence and better anticipate how the pandemic might evolve.

The viral variant argument is just more of the same VAIDS coverup, and an absurdly false narrative that they are attempting to deploy in order to evolve their scamdemic followup.

Continue reading

Total Page Visits: 156 - Today Page Visits: 2
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.