COMMENTARY / OPINION
RICO & Comey Peggy Tierney
SEP 26, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
James Comey, former FBI Director, was indicted on September 25, 2025, by a federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, on two felony charges: providing false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding, each carrying potential penalties of up to five years in prison. Bondi’s prosecutors allege Comey “willfully and knowingly” made materially false statements under oath.
[Ed.:
WOW! UN Representatives Run Out as Netanyahu Exposes Their Hypocrisy In Epic Speech! [1:01:47] Yishai Fleisher
Yishai reacts to Netanyahu Live at the United Nations in New York today September 26, 2025.
Israel & the UN Peggy Tierney
SEP 26, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
Here’s some highlights from Bibi’s speech to the UN about Hamas. I transcribed it and highlighted the most important statements:
BIBI: “Iran tried to assassinate Trump twice. We will not let [their proxies] shove a terrorist state down down throats.”
NETANYAHU AT UN: “Over the past year, we’ve hammered the Houthis and crushed the bulk of the Hamas terror machine. We crippled Hezbollah, taking out most of its leaders and much of its weapons arsenal.
The final remnants of Hamas (Iran) are holed up in Gaza City. They vow to repeat the atrocities of October 7 again and again and again, no matter how diminished their forces. That is why Israel must finish the job.
Much of the world no longer remembers October 7, but we remember. On October 7, Hamas carried out the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust. They slaughtered 1,200 innocent people, including over 40 Americans and foreign nationals from dozens of countries represented here.
They beheaded men. They raped women. They burnt babies alive. They burnt babies alive in front of their parents. And these monsters took more than 250 people hostage.
So far, we’ve brought home 207 of these hostages, but 48 still remain in the dungeons of Gaza. 20 of them are alive, starved, tortured, deprived of any daylight, deprived of humanity.
I want to speak from this forum, directly to those hostages through loudspeakers. I’ve surrounded Gaza with massive loudspeakers connected to this microphone in the hope that our dear hostages will hear my message. We have not forgotten you, not even for a second. The people of Israel are with you. We will not falter and we will not rest until we bring all of you home.
So to the remaining Hamas leaders and to the jailers of our hostages, I now say lay down your arms. Let my people go. Free the hostages. All of them. The whole 48. Free the hostages now. If you do, you will live. If you don’t, Israel will hunt you down. If Hamas agrees to our demands, the war could end right now. Gaza would be demilitarized.
Israel would retain overriding security control and a peaceful civilian authority would be established by Gazans and others committed to peace with Israel.
I want to tell you a secret. Behind closed doors, many of the leaders who publicly condemn us privately thank us. They tell me how much they value Israel’s superb intelligence services that have prevented time and again terrorist attacks in their capitals.
They say, “Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us.”
President Trump understands better than any other leader that Israel and America face a common threat.
Together, we devastated Iran’s atomic weapons and ballistic missiles programs. Iran tried to assassinate Trump twice.
Iran’s terror axis threatens the peace of the entire world. They threaten the United States and Israel and blackmail nations everywhere [and they are funded by Russia and Communist China – chew on that.]
I want to thank President Trump for his bold and decisive action. President Trump and I promised to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, and we delivered on that promise.
Israel is accused of deliberately targeting civilians in Gaza. Nothing could be further from the truth. The world’s greatest expert on urban warfare says Israel is applying more measures to minimize civilian casualties than any military in history especially when you consider that Gaza is one of the most densely populated urban areas on Earth. It has hundreds of miles of terror tunnels underground and it has countless terror towers above ground and thousands of terrorists embedded in the tunnels and in these towers in civilian areas.
If you want to see what measures Israel takes to avoid civilian casualties in this war, just look at what we’re doing now in Gaza City, the last Hamas stronghold, one of the two last strongholds. For three weeks, Israel dropped millions of leaflets, sent millions of text messages, and made countless phone calls urging civilians to leave Gaza City before our military moves in.
At the same time, Hamas implants itself in mosques, schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, and tries to force those civilians not to leave, to stay in harm’s way. And it often threatens them at gunpoint if they try to do so.
For Israel, every civilian casualty is a tragedy. For Hamas, it’s a strategy. Hamas uses civilians as human shields and as props in its sick propaganda war in Israel against Israel. A propaganda war that the western media buys hook, line and sinker.
If there are Gazans who don’t have enough food, it’s because Hamas is stealing it. Hamas steals it, hoards it, and sells it at exorbitant prices to fight its war machine. Last month, even the UN admitted that Hamas and other armed groups looted 85% of the trucks. That’s why you have deprivation.
They tell me, “Wait a minute. We believe in a two-state solution where the Jewish state of Israel will live side by side in peace with the Palestinian state.”
There’s only one problem with that. The Palestinians, they don’t believe in this solution. They never have. They don’t want a state next to Israel. They want a Palestinian state instead of Israel. And that’s why every time they were offered a Palestinian state, but were required to end a conflict with Israel and recognize a Jewish state, every time over the decades they turned it down.
You should know that the Palestinian Authorities (PLO and Hamas) pays terrorists to slay Jews. The more Jews the terrorists slay, the more the Palestinian Authority pays. The Palestinian Authority names its government buildings, its public squares, its schools after the mass murderers of Jews, which they glorify as martyrs. The Palestinian Authority is corrupt to the core. They haven’t held elections in 20 years. They use the same textbooks as Hamas. Exactly the same textbooks. They teach their children to hate Jews and destroy the Jewish state. And Christians don’t fare much better.
Israel will not allow you to shove a terrorist state down our throats. We will not commit national suicide because you don’t have the guts to face down a hostile media and anti-Semitic mobs demanding Israel’s blood.”
Bibi is correct. I’m glad he made this speech because Hamas is winning the PR war. Hamas must be destroyed and Iran must be defunded and neutered. I’ve reported all this many times. Sadly, not only does the left lie about Bibi – because he’s a conservative leader of Israel – the RINOs and the Koch Libertarians do too. They want you to hate Israel and embrace Hamas!
Dennis Prager, a Jew, did an interview, from his sick bed, explaining that liberal Jews and conservative Jews are NOT the same – JUST LIKE American liberals and American conservatives are not the same! George Soros, a liberal Jew, and Bibi Netanyahu, a conservative Jew, are not the same! In other words, the ONLY reason so many RINOs, Koch Libertarians and liberals hate Israel today is because Bibi is a conservative! I’ve been trying to convince people of this for years but Dennis did a great job.
As I’ve reported many times, the terms “Palestinian” and the PLO and Hamas were created by the Soviet KGB as a propaganda and terrorist tool against the United States and Israel. Putin, Xi and the Ayatollah are laughing at us for being so stupid to buy their BS from Hamas, Iran, the Brotherhood and the PLO.
You can read my reports on this here. I’ve studied this for years and I stand by my research.
NO PRESIDENT TRUMP – IT’S JUDEA & SAMARIA, AND SOVEREIGNTY IS INEVITABLE!!! Avi Abelow
September 26, 2025 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel
President Trump last night declared that he would not allow Israel to “annex the West Bank.” Some people are angry. Some are extremely disappointed. Personally? I’m not surprised and definitely not worried.
Let’s start with the basics. It’s not the “West Bank.” That’s a term our enemies use, a geographic fiction designed to erase our ancient, undeniable Jewish connection to the land. The correct name is Judea and Samaria, the historic cradle of Jewish civilization, where the majority of the Bible stories took place, where Abraham walked, where our prophets spoke, and where our people lived for thousands of years. The only reason anyone calls it the “West Bank” today is because Jordan illegally occupied the ‘West Bank of the Jordan River’ for 19 years and the world decided to run with the propaganda.
You don’t annex something that’s already yours…
So maybe President Trump was just using the wrong term on purpose? Maybe it was semantics. But more likely, it wasn’t.
Still, I’m not panicking. And that’s because I’m a realist.
Realism means looking beyond headlines and seeing the full picture. President Trump, despite this comment, has been one of the strongest allies Israel has ever had. He moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, recognized our sovereignty over the Golan Heights, pulled out of the disastrous Iran deal, and unapologetically supported Israel’s right to fight this war across the whole Islamonaz*i Middle East.
But here’s where realism cuts deeper: No matter what any U.S. President says or tries to do, including President Trump, sovereignty over Judea, Samaria, and Gaza is not just inevitable. It’s necessary for Israel and the whole freedom loving world.
Why?
Because Hamas is never going to disarm.
Because the Palestinian Authority is never going to stop funding terrorism or inciting murder.
Because the international community will never prioritize Jewish security over political theater.l and appeasing their growing Muslim population.
Because the two-state solution was never a solution, just a slogan masking a long war to destroy the Jewish state of Israel.
Hamas has openly declared that October 7th was just the beginning. Their charter still calls for genocide. Their actions, from the massacre of babies to the brutal torture of civilians, prove they are not freedom fighters. They are a death cult. No amount of negotiations, ceasefires, or foreign aid will change that.
And the so-called “moderate” Palestinian Authority? They’re just as complicit. They name schools after terrorists. They pay salaries to murderers sitting in Israeli jails. They’ve never stopped glorifying violence. The PA doesn’t want peace, they want power, and they want it built on the ashes of the Jewish state.
So explain to me: How is Israel supposed to exist with our lands under their control?
We already did that in Gaza. We pulled out in 2005, not one settler left, not one IDF soldier remained, not one grave even remained in the ground. We got 20 years of terror tunnels, rocket barrages, the horrific Oct. 7th massacre of innocents, with this barbaric war raging on with out hostages still held in Gaza terror tunnels. Never again.
Sovereignty is inevitable because the status quo is unsustainable. If we don’t apply Israeli law to Judea and Samaria, and Gaza, someone else will, whether it’s Hamas, the PA, or worse. And when lawlessness reigns, Jewish blood is spilled.
But here’s the most important truth of all: I’m not worried because, as a Jew, I don’t put my faith in world leaders, not even Trump. I put my faith in God.
We are obligated to act, to defend ourselves, to speak the truth, to build, to create facts on the ground, but ultimately, it is God who determines the outcome.
The rebirth of the State of Israel? That wasn’t supposed to happen.
Winning our wars against impossible odds? That wasn’t supposed to happen.
Surviving the Iranian- and Qatari-backed, multi-front genocidal assault that began on October 7th? That wasn’t supposed to happen either.
But it all did. Because God runs the world, and our return to this land is not a modern political story, it’s a divine promise unfolding in real time.
So I choose to be grateful, to President Trump for all he’s done, to Prime Minister Netanyahu, and to God for all He’s doing. And I choose to stay focused, on educating, advocating, and explaining why sovereignty over Judea, Samaria, and yes, Gaza, is the only way to finally end the terror war against us.
Trump introduced his Gaza emigration plan, a rational, humane strategy to give Arabs in these areas the option of leaving, since their booby trapped, terror tunnel homes are no longer. That is the only plan that addresses the reality on the ground. Not fantasy peace accords with terror states. Not empowering the next Mahmoud Abbas or Ismail Haniyeh. All those in this genocidal culture called “Palestine” who support our destruction, live elsewhere, not in Judea, Samaria or Gaza.
So whether it’s under Trump and Netanyahu, or under someone else after them, I know this will happen.
Not a question of if it will happen, but when.
Why am I so sure? Because I’m a realist.
And because I believe in the destiny of the Jewish people in the Land of Israel, all of it.
Judea and Samaria is not a bargaining chip. It is the heart of our home.
And no one will stop us from claiming what is ours.
To conclude, the hard truth, which too many in the West still refuse to acknowledge, is that the ideology driving Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and their backers is not about a border dispute with Israel, it’s a 1,400+ year global jihadist movement committed to subjugating and conquering the world.
October 7th was not only an attack on Israel; it was an attack on the values of every freedom-loving society. That’s why the loss of land for radical Islamic movements in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza, through Israeli sovereignty, combined with President Trump’s own emigration plan, is a necessary step way to uproot this terror infrastructure and protect the entire civilized world from a 1,400-year-old jihadist ideology.
Appeasing that ideology instead of crushing it, and pressuring Israel not to apply sovereignty, is not just bad for Israel. It is disastrous for the United States, for Europe, and for the entire Western world, because it signals weakness and invites more terror, not less.
History has shown us: only moral clarity and decisive action defeat evil, never appeasement.
The Jewish people, in our God given ancestral homeland have that moral clarity. Those who bless us and support us to do what is necessary, will be blessed. Those who curse us and stop us from doing what needs to be done, will be cursed.
Yes, it’s that simple. All one has to do is strengthen their faith in the only entity worthy of faith, God.
Onwards to sovereignty and Trump’s emigration plan! When? Just wait and see…
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMvk
Europe Wants To Make “Palestine”, Israel Has A SURPRISE For Them! [42:31] Yishai Fleisher
September 26, 2025 – Amichai Chikli, Minister of Diaspora Affairs, is a rising star in Israeli politics. Hear his take on Israel’s bombing of Hamas in Qatar, his formula for how to win in in Gaza, and how to defeat to diplomatic tsunami of “Palestine”.
Jonathan Pollard: My plan for Gaza, the PA, and Israel’s future [39:22]
Sep 21, 2025
Jonathan Pollard, the former Israeli spy who spent 30 years in a US prison, sits down for a rare and candid interview about his decision to run for Knesset, his views on October 7, Israeli security policy, and the future of Gaza.
Pollard speaks about his time in solitary confinement, the US and Israeli governments’ treatment of him, and why he believes Israel must fundamentally change its approach to war and politics.
Drone Attack on My City — A Tree Saved Lives in Eilat, 20+ Injured — EILAT Under Fire [50:48] Mansur Ashka
September 24, 2025
Alfred Kinsey and the collapse of American values DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
Kinsey showed us how to destroy a civilization…
SEP 24, 2025
The assassination of American Charlie Kirk has led much of our society to examine what a civilization is and to ask what creates a civilized society. Charlie Kirk was a strong and determined advocate for Judeo-Christian values, committed marriage, and the well-being of children and families.
One of the most destructive moral influences upon American civilization was, and continues to be, Alfred Kinsey. In the span of his lifetime, Kinsey managed (with the aid of Deep State forces through the Intelligence services) to extensively upend the ethical forces that held in check baser human instincts.
Alfred Kinsey: Redefining agony as ecstasy–stealing childhood innocence DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
MARCH 10, 2024 – It’s 3 am. I am awake, considering how to begin this column. We knew Dr. Judith Reisman and counted her a friend for over 25 years. She was mature, energetic, caring, outgoing and wicked smart until the end. She spent decades investigating, reporting, and writing about some of the worst abuses imaginable. Learning about them, herself, was not enough. Sh…
Civilization is in many ways the management of human appetites to maximize freedom for all members of the community. The mores of American culture in the 1940s, rooted in Judeo-Christian values, emphasized the respect and even sacredness of marriage, as well as the encouragement and affirmation of marital fidelity. Kinsey tore through these traditional values with a chainsaw—promoting promiscuity and declaring that if a sexual act could be physically performed, it was acceptable and natural. He included both adult sex with children, as well as sex with animals, in this definition.
Kinsey’s books: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male(1948), followed by Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953), included chapters purporting to prove the sexuality of infants and prepubescent children with charts documenting what he called children’s orgasms. His sources for large portions of his data were predatory pedophiles, from whom Kinsey collected data for his hypotheses rather than reporting them to the authorities.
These pedophiles, in turn, have been protected by the Kinsey Institute, a nonprofit affiliated with Indiana University. The data he collected from the sources he protected has continued to be locked away, supposedly to protect the privacy of the reporters who were abusing children.
What an irony! That Kinsey, who advocates the removal of all boundaries upon sexuality, has one ironclad boundary of privacy protecting his research against the independent examination of the foundational sources of his data, including child abusers.
Kinsey’s work inspired Hugh Hefner and spawned the entire Playboy empire, leading to the explosion of pornography, pedophilia, and the hook-up culture so prevalent in America today, and shaking the civilizational foundation of marriage and family to its core. The unraveling of the American family has, in turn, fractured the foundations of our very civilization.
Even worse, Kinsey encouraged sexual acts and engagement between adults and children, including infants. As we reported in our earlier column on Alfred Kinsey:
The [Kinsey] institute contains, in its archives, the stories of hundreds, if not thousands, of acts of sexual abuse against children. Many of these accounts involve the physical rape of very small children. These reports include precise details of the children crying, resisting, and making other efforts to fend off their assailants. These details are included because Dr. Alfred Kinsey, the Father of the Sexual Revolution, believed in collecting detailed “scientific” accounts of every kind of sexual act between human beings, including violent sexual acts committed upon children by adults.
On their official website, the Kinsey Institute denies that Kinsey and his colleagues hired, collaborated with, or persuaded people to carry out experiments on children. But Dr. Reisman’s research and evidence, along with the evidence of others, prove otherwise. Furthermore, a 1995 Washington Post article reported:
Yesterday, the director of the Kinsey Institute revealed that Kinsey’s conclusions on the sexuality of young children were based not on scientific study but on the secret history of a single pedophile who kept a diary of his experiences with 317 pre-adolescent boys.
The Kinsey Institute director in 1995 was John Bancroft, who “clarified” Kinsey’s research approach at a press conference in Washington, DC, called by a Representative of Congress investigating Kinsey’s methods of research, their legality, conclusions, and effects upon school curricula and American culture.
Bancroft went on to declare that no one will ever know what happened to the children whose orgasms are reported in the Kinsey Tables in the Sexual Behavior of the Human Male. The Post article continued quoting Bancroft:
“There was no contact with any of the boys by anyone at the institute, only with the man’s notes,” he said. The institute “has never carried out sexual experiments on children.” As for the pedophile — who was not paid — he is catalogued at the Kinsey Institute under a pseudonym, which could be decoded but will not be if Bancroft has anything to do with it. “The man is long dead. He died around 1955,” the director said.
The 50th Anniversary edition of the Sexual Behavior in the Human Female includes eighteen closely typed pages in justification and defense of Kinsey’s work, written by the Director of the Institute at that time, John Bancroft. Kinsey believed in a concept he termed ‘total sexual outlet.’ Bancroft declared:
The fact that he [Kinsey] combined orgasms from six principal sources, masturbation, nocturnal emissions, heterosexual petting, heterosexual intercourse, homosexual relations, and intercourse with animals, to derive his ‘total sexual outlet,’ in no way means that he regarded each of these sources of orgasm as of equal value in social or interpersonal or emotional terms, for either men or women. His lack of comment on the moral value of any form of sexual behavior was central to his non-judgmental approach, without which his long-running project, which he envisioned as continuing for many years longer than it did, would not have been viable. We regret that he made no such moral comparisons, because without them he describes sexual behavior in something of a moral vacuum which others have been quick to fill with their own interpretations of Kinsey’s moral standpoint…
Bancroft goes on to discuss critics of Kinsey’s work. What he fails to observe is that in this vacuum, which he describes, many new liberties and assumptions were indeed taken, and many moral protections, however imperfect, which had been in place for generations for women and for all children (and for that matter, animals) were gravely weakened.
Most egregiously, Kinsey declared in 1953 in Sexual Behavior in the Human Female:
There are, of course, instances of adults who have done physical damage to children with whom they have attempted sexual contact… But these cases are in the minority, and the public should learn to distinguish such serious contacts from other adult contacts that are not likely to do the child any appreciable harm if the child’s parents do not become disturbed.
Our radio guest, Rhonda Miller, is CEO of Purple for Parents, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting children from the harmful agendas in government schools, from indoctrination to sexual grooming. She is leading members of her organization along with other international groups with shared goals to lobby in Washington, DC in order to finally have the Kinsey Institute and the institute’s foundational sex research locked away within the institute fully investigated.
Listeners who wish to support and follow her work can go to purple4parents.org.
primary author: Ginger Breggin
First aired on AmericaOutLoud.news Sept. 22, 2025
Mike Pompeo: There Is No Palestinian State to Recognize By Mike Pompeo
The decision by countries like the UK, France, and Canada to recognize ‘Palestine’ will only prolong the danger to Israel and the anguish of everyday Gazans.
September 23, 2025 The FP – The recognition of the so-called Palestinian state by Britain, Portugal, France, Canada, and Australia this week was nothing short of perverse.
It was practically absurd, morally reprehensible, and will only prolong the danger to Israel and the anguish of everyday Gazans. Perhaps worst of all, it distracts from the real problem preventing peace: the Iranian regime, which provides terror groups with the money and arms needed to carry out their most horrific attacks.
Far from advancing the cause of peace in the region, the move has thrown a lifeline to Hamas at a time when the civilized world should be uniting in support of Israel’s efforts to defeat the terror group once and for all. It likewise disincentivizes Gaza’s leaders to agree to a ceasefire, let alone release the remaining hostages, dozens of which remain in Hamas captivity.
Make no mistake: The decision by these countries to treat “Palestine” as an independent state ratifies the logic of the terrorists who, nearly two years ago to the day, perpetrated the worst attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust. The twisted logic that this move will somehow isolate Hamas by empowering the illegitimate, unpopular, terror-supporting Palestinian Authority is beyond fanciful. As the perpetrators of the October 7, 2023 attack, Hamas—which has already lauded the move as “a deserved outcome of our people’s struggle”—will continue to claim that achieving statehood was their doing. And they will be right. Far from damaging Hamas, it will empower them, while broadcasting to the Middle East and the world at large that terrorism gets results.
The actions taken by these countries represent the worst kind of diplomatic fantasy. Diplomats must be in the business of dealing with the world as it is, not as they’d like it to be. That’s not what they’re doing here.
Recognizing a Palestinian state where none exists is not only a bad idea because of its practical implications for security; it fails at the first hurdle, as the most basic requirements of sovereignty are absent. What will the borders of this so-called Palestinian state be, and how will that be settled? How can the Palestinian Authority—which has not held elections in 20 years—be considered a legitimate governing authority in any sense of the word? Who signs the documents, makes the laws, and controls the military? No one has been able to answer these baseline questions amid their preening and pontificating.
Genuine peace will only come with the total defeat of Hamas and its most important backer: the Islamic Republic of Iran.
When I served as Secretary of State in the first Trump administration, we recognized that neither the Hamas-led government in Gaza nor the corrupt, terrorist-supporting Palestinian Authority in the West Bank had any interest in a peaceful two-state solution. With the historic Abraham Accords, we took a new approach that isolated bad actors and incentivized constructive engagement and recognition of Israel as the path to regional peace.
The path being pursued by our allies in Europe and elsewhere does the exact opposite: rewarding the terrorists and kleptocrats who seek to destroy Israel, and who keep their own people oppressed and immiserated.
Genuine peace will only come with the total defeat of Hamas and its most important backer: the Islamic Republic of Iran.
For decades, Iran has used its proxies throughout the region to encircle Israel within a “ring of fire,” keeping the world’s only Jewish nation in a state of permanent existential peril. They’ve sent hundreds of millions to Hamas and other terror networks, such as Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah. And they’ve done all this while feverishly trying to build a nuclear arsenal that would pose an intolerable threat to Israel and imperil American forces across the region.
History shows that peace has never been secured through appeasement—a lesson one would have thought our European and Anglosphere allies would keenly appreciate.
October 7 showed the Israelis that this intolerable situation could not continue. Thanks to Israel’s military actions against Iranian proxies across the region and the degrading of Iran’s covert nuclear program by Israel and the U.S., the Islamic Republic is arguably weaker than it has ever been. The move to recognize a Palestinian state where none exists did not just reward terror groups. It was also a boon to a faltering regime in Tehran desperate to repair its standing among Iranians after its decisive defeat in June’s 12-Day War.
Any leader who genuinely desires peace should instead seize the historic opportunity to continue to diminish the Iranian regime and empower the forces across the region that seek a constructive relationship with Israel.
History shows that peace has never been secured through appeasement—a lesson one would have thought our European and Anglosphere allies would keenly appreciate. Israel does not have the luxury of forgetting that lesson, and so they will continue to hold the line against barbarism, even if their supposed friends in the West will not.
READ Mike Pompeo: We Don’t Need a Fake Deal With Iran
READ Hamas Thought Qatar Was Safe. Israel Proved Otherwise.
10 IMMIGRANT-DOMINATED European Cities in 2025 [20:01] prince pathak
Sep 19, 2025 #tommyrobinson #unitethekingdom #usaHello Guys So In Today’s Video We Are Going To Show You, 10 immigrant-dominated European cities in 2025. So if you like the video so please click on the like button and also subscribe to my channel for important information and also share my channel with your relatives and friends.
In 2025, both the USA and Europe face an immigration storm. From illegal immigrants in the USA, Trump immigration policies, and the rising homeless crisis, to illegal immigration in Europe, refugees 2025, and immigrant-dominated cities, the pressure is growing everywhere. In the UK, tensions rise with the London Unite the Kingdom protest, Tommy Robinson rallies, and anger over asylum hotels and anti-immigration protests. This video dives into the truth about immigrants vs illegal immigrants, deportations, homelessness, and the battle over immigration reform in the US and Europe—a reality shaping the future of entire nations. We will also talk about U.S. policy about h1 visa and Trump new policy.
[Ed.:
BREAKING: Islamists BURN DOWN Italy As Meloni Refuses To Recognise ‘Palestine’ [56:28] Mahyar Tousi
September 22, 2025 Tousi TV
Somalis Have Officially TAKEN OVER Minneapolis [14:03] Brandon Lehman
Sep 21, 2025 – Ilhan Omar Publicly States Her Allegiance to Somalia as The Mayor of Minneapolis Declares His City Somalian Territory
Trump taunts Russia as ‘paper tiger’ and tells Zelensky he will help Ukraine win all of its land back LEO HOHMANN
‘Peace President’ goes all in with the neocon warmongering wing of his party
SEP 23, 2025
How ironic that on the very day President Donald Trump’s second would-be assassin, Ryan Routh, was convicted on all charges, the president swings over to the same side of an issue that was very important to Routh.
Mr. Routh was a rabid supporter of Ukraine in its Western-backed proxy war against Russia and he was literally in the business of recruiting mercenaries for the Ukrainian armed forces.
While speaking at the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday, President Trump gave Europeans a tongue-lashing for buying Russian oil and gas and urged them to not only stop buying it but to join him in levying economic sanctions against China, India and any other country that buys oil from Russia. These were fighting words.
In a post to Truth Social, Trump indicated he’s changed his opinion on Ukraine. He now agrees with Ryan Routh that Ukraine can actually win its war with Russia and reclaim all of its lost territories. Of course, that’s absurd. Russia has four times the population and has been showing it can churn out three times as much ammunition as the West in a protracted war situation.
In the above statement, Trump mocks Russia as a fake military power and foolishly refers to Russia as a “paper tiger.” He implied that he would continue to support Ukraine’s drone attacks on Russian oil and gas facilities. This ignores the fact that Russia has refused to roll out its biggest and most devastating weapon systems against Ukraine as Putin has held out for a negotiated settlement with Trump, giving him the benefit of the doubt as an honest broker. He’s quickly learning that Trump is no more in favor of ending this war than Biden was, so perhaps we will see some of those bigger weapons deployed against Ukraine in the near future. Yes, Putin could end this war in a week if he unleashed Oreshnik missiles on Kiev and targeted key government installations instead of just infrastructure and weapons depots. Is Trump daring him to do that?
Trump writes:
“In fact, it is very much making them look like ‘a paper tiger.’ When the people living in Moscow, and all of the Great Cities, towns and districts all throughout Russia, find out what is really going on with this War, the fact that it’s almost impossible for them to get gasoline through the long lines that are being formed, and all of the other things that are taking place in their War Economy, where most of their money is being spent on fighting Ukraine, which has Great Spirit, and only getting better, Ukraine would be able to take back their Country in its original form and, who knows, maybe even go further than that! Putin and Russia are in BIG Economic trouble, and this is the time for Ukraine to act.”
He then went on to say that “We will continue to supply weapons to NATO for NATO to do what they want with them.”
There’s a lot to unpack in this statement from Trump.
First, he is signaling to Putin that he will continue to support the drone attacks deep inside Russia, targeting specifically Russia’s energy sector. The fact that Trump is trying to hide US financial and military support for Ukraine behind the facade of “NATO” is a joke. Everyone knows that NATO is run by the United States, and without the United States, NATO would cease to exist. But Trump says he’s going to “supply weapons to NATO for NATO to do what they want with them.” He must really think we are are stupid. Maybe most of us are. Unfortunately, Putin is not. He will at some point respond to Trump’s bullying.
Second, Trump hints that the US financial and military support for Ukraine will not end until Ukraine pushes Russia out of all its territory, which ostensibly includes Crimea, a peninsula Russia will never hand over to the Western puppets in Ukraine. But Trump doesn’t stop there. He takes his jab at Russian pride a step further when he says maybe the US will not be satisfied with reclaiming all of Ukraine but may even use its Ukrainian proxies to push into Russian territory. He could not have issued a more provocative statement if he had tried.
This is Trump signaling to Putin and the world that he is going all in with the neocons of his party, led by Lindsey Graham, who wish to confront Russia and get into a shooting war with that rival superpower. In effect, they want World War III to commence as soon as possible and will do whatever is necessary to provoke Russia into starting it.
The most outragious part of Trump’s statement, however, was his referring to Russia as a “paper tiger.” This is the country with the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons and advanced hypersonic missiles that can be launched and hit European capitals within minutes. This is the country with the world’s largest supply of natural resources, including rare earths, gold, oil, gas, and great mineral wealth. Yet, Trump chooses to ignore Russia’s legitimate security interests on its border with Ukraine and side with the insane Europeans who want World War III with Russia. Then he chooses to throw salt in Putin’s eye by referring to his country, which has a 1,000-year history, as a “paper tiger.” Incredible.
These comments by Trump also prove that I have been right all along in my analysis that Trump never had any intentions of dismantling NATO. It’s still very useful as the military arm of a U.S.-led New World Order.
Later in the day, while speaking with French President Macron in a joint presser, Trump doubled down on his statement about Russia, saying, “Most of you have seen the recent statement I put out. I’m glad you got it, but I feel that way. Let him (Zelensky) get that land back, so we’ll see how it all works out.”
Yes, we will see how it works out. If Trump continues down this path and gets Europe to join him in escalating the economic warfare against Russia, look out. World War III, here we come.
BOTTOM LINE: Russians will see this statement by Trump as something very near a declaration of war. Trump talks a lot about how this war is more of a European problem than an American one because “we are surrounded by oceans” and the Europeans are right there in Russia’s backyard.
It’s sad that I need to remind you of this, Mr. President: Oceans don’t stop Oreshnik missiles.
Pray for peace. Prepare for war. These are tumultuous times.
[Ed.: “Nothing is as it appears to be!” Trump’s announcement is so absurd, that it couldn’t even be true! We remember how recently, Trump and Netanyahu had what was presented as a big falling out when it wasn’t really happening? This statement to the UN might be a deliberate false flag to divert attention from the elite globalist leadership’s accountability for their bio-attack on humanity. Under pressure, who are they going to attack? They will strike at the US and our industries (Europe is already no good as a target). We mustn’t take this at face value! It may very well be a stage show and a false flag, and Putin, like Netanyahu is in on it.]
When God Flips the Script By: Shira Schechter
September 23, 2025
Life often moves in breathtaking reversals. The tech mogul who seemed untouchable faces congressional hearings. The political dynasty that ruled for decades loses in a landslide. The startup launched by college dropouts becomes worth billions overnight. In the space of a single moment—a market crash, a medical diagnosis, an unexpected pregnancy, a political revolution—everything changes. The mighty fall, the humble ascend, and what seemed permanent proves as fragile as morning mist.
This is the reality Hannah knew intimately, and it’s one of the reasons her voice echoes through our synagogues on Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year).
Why do we read Hannah’s story from the Book of Samuel on the Day of Judgment? The traditional answers speak of divine remembrance, since God remembered Hannah on this day and granted her a child, and the power of prayer. But Rabbi Yissachar Frand points to another message embedded in Hannah’s own words. What truth about the nature of existence did this once-barren woman understand that makes her prayer essential reading as we stand before the divine throne of judgment?
Hannah’s prayer reveals a universe that is full of uncertainty. God actively orchestrates the rise and fall of human fortune with stunning regularity. After giving birth to Samuel, she doesn’t simply thank God for her personal miracle. In her prayer, she delivers a theological manifesto about the fundamental instability of all earthly circumstances:
יְהֹוָה מוֹרִישׁ וּמַעֲשִׁיר מַשְׁפִּיל אַף־מְרוֹמֵם׃
Hashem makes poor and makes rich; He casts down, He also lifts high.
God doesn’t merely permit change—He actively engineers it.
The Sages understood that when Hannah proclaims, “while the barren woman has born seven, she that had many children has been bereaved” (1 Samuel 2:5), she speaks not only of her own transformation from childlessness to motherhood, but of her co-wife Penina’s loss of motherhood.
Hannah had seven children, but, according to tradition, her rival wife Penina, who had taunted her for years with cruel reminders of her barrenness, would lose one child each time Hannah gave birth. The woman who had lorded her fertility over Hannah discovered that fortune’s wheel turns with merciless precision. Penina’s advantage became her devastation, while Hannah’s shame became her glory.
Rabbi Frand explains that Hannah’s prayer serves as the ultimate Rosh Hashanah message because it demolishes our illusions about permanence. We enter the Day of Judgment carrying assumptions about our fixed circumstances, our unshakeable positions, our guaranteed futures. Hannah shatters these assumptions by revealing that God specializes in complete reversals.
While this might instill within us a sense of uneasiness, it also gives us hope and confidence. The poverty that defines your identity today may become tomorrow’s wealth. The children you lack today may fill your house before another Rosh Hashanah arrives. The humiliation that crushes you now may become the foundation for your future honor.
Often, when we see the wealthy prospering while the righteous suffer, when we watch the humble being crushed while the arrogant soar, we make a critical error: we assume these circumstances are permanent. Hannah’s prayer reminds us that God operates on a different timeline than human expectation.
Penina’s mockery of Hannah lasted years, but God’s response lasted generations. Hannah’s disgrace was temporary; her vindication was eternal. The woman who couldn’t conceive became the mother of Samuel the prophet, whose spiritual influence shaped the entire future of Israel. The woman who was shamed at the Tabernacle became the author of one of Scripture’s most powerful prayers, from which we learn some of the fundamental laws about prayer in general.
Standing before God in divine judgment each Rosh Hashanah, we need Hannah’s perspective. The circumstances that seem so solid today—your financial security, your family problems, your health challenges, your social status—exist within a universe where God actively rearranges human fortune according to His perfect wisdom.
Hannah’s prayer doesn’t promise that everyone’s situation will improve, but it promises that our circumstances can change according to divine will. The great reversal isn’t just Hannah’s story—it can be the story that awaits everyone who places their trust in the One who holds the pillars of the earth in His hands. Nothing in your life is so broken that He cannot rebuild it, so lost that He cannot restore it, so humbled that He cannot exalt it. This Rosh Hashanah, as we hear Hannah’s words again, we’re reminded that the God who judges us is the same God who transforms us.
Shira Schechter Shira Schechter is the content editor for TheIsraelBible.com and Israel365 Publications. She earned master’s degrees in both Jewish Education and Bible from Yeshiva University. She taught the Hebrew Bible at a high school in New Jersey for eight years before making Aliyah with her family in 2013. Shira joined the Israel365 staff shortly after moving to Israel and contributed significantly to the development and publication of The Israel Bible.
Something Deeply Disturbing Is Happening in Vietnam Maria Zeee
If you think this can’t happen here, think again.
SEP 22, 2025 THE VIGILANT FOX | DAILY PULSE
Watch the Full Episode
STORY #1 – The UK is racing to impose a dystopian digital ID—one that decides whether you can work, bank, or even go online.
This goes far beyond immigration. It’s about control over every aspect of your life.
Minister Liz Kendall admitted it outright: digital ID will determine who can access government services—and who can’t. No ID means no access. That isn’t convenience—it’s exclusion.
Australia shows us what’s coming next. A rollout pitched as “voluntary” in 2024 has already become mandatory. By next year, Australians won’t even be able to perform a Google search without a digital ID. Now the UK is moving in lockstep, with reports confirming that digital IDs will soon be tied to jobs, housing, and immigration checks.
Critics call it the oldest trick in the book: problem, reaction, solution. Open the borders, spark outrage, then use the chaos to push digital ID as the “fix” for the problems they just made. But the ones really being locked out aren’t the migrants—it’s you.
This isn’t about stopping illegals. It’s the blueprint of a global control grid—and once the gates slam shut, they rarely open again.
Click here to watch the full episode.
STORY #2 – Vietnam just shut down a jaw-dropping 86 MILLION bank accounts overnight, cutting citizens off from their own money for refusing to hand over their biometric data.
This is state-enforced digital control, showing just how fast freedom disappears when survival is tied to compliance.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman warns Americans not to assume it “can’t happen here.” With REAL ID rolling out and Palantir-linked surveillance expanding, the same playbook is already underway on American soil.
In Vietnam, people had “a few months’ warning,” then watched their accounts freeze. Most complied without protest. And that same passive mindset is spreading in the U.S. today.
Make no mistake: this is a global test run for total control.
The only defense is building a parallel economy—now. Support for local businesses, the use of cash, and holding gold and silver are a must. Because once the switch flips here, our freedom won’t come back.
Click here to watch the full episode.
STORY #3 – The FDA just made a SHOCKING admission—it never tested Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for DNA fragments, relying solely on the drugmakers’ word.
At an official CDC meeting, pediatric cardiologist Kirk Milhoan demanded answers on why the shots remain on the market when independent labs found DNA contamination hundreds of times above legal limits.
The FDA admitted it had done zero independent testing and offered no timeline for action.
Independent studies led by Kevin McKernan and David Speicher revealed excess plasmid DNA—including SV40 sequences linked to cancer research—far beyond FDA and WHO thresholds. Regulators claim there’s “no evidence of harm,” yet a new study found vaccine DNA integrated into the genome of a 31-year-old woman with aggressive bladder cancer.
Their admission exposes a chilling truth: regulators aren’t protecting you—they’re protecting Big Pharma. Maria Zeee’s explosive report uncovers what they don’t want you to see.
Click here to watch the full episode.
Who is REALLY behind it all? Peggy Tierney
SEP 22, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
Many people have asked me to explain who on earth I think are ultimately AT THE TOP of the financial pyramid – and the human puppet masters behind all the chaos in the world. Who the heck are really behind the satanic cabal called the New World Order (NWO) and who do they give direction to? Who ULTIMATELY ordered the hit on President Trump and took out Charlie?
In the span of just a few years in the 1960s, who ultimately decided that JFK needed to be assassinated on live TV by a Communist patsy and replaced with LBJ? Who decided that his brother Bobby Kennedy (RFK) needed to be murdered by a Palestinian-Jordanian patsy so he could never run against Nixon for President? Who decided that Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. should be slaughtered for supporting RFK and rejecting LBJ?
King‘s assassination in April 1968 and Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination in June 1968 changed the 1968 election. Had Kennedy lived, he might have been a candidate King supported due to their shared interest in social justice. Kennedy’s assassination effectively eliminated that possibility.
Then, after Nixon went on to win – who decided that Nixon needed to be driven out of office in the most humiliating way and replaced with someone they could control? Who decided that Dementia Biden should steal the White House from Trump TWICE and who decided that Charlie needed to be gunned down in front of his supporters on a Utah college campus – in a state run by a RINO Governor that Obama loves – at just 31 years old.
I could go on and on…but you get the drift. These are questions that keep me up at night. What I do know is that these things don’t just happen. Someone ordered them to happen. Who makes the decisions? Who orders the hits? Who pays for all this chaos? Who organizes and brainwashes the foot soldiers and pays the professionals for the murders?
Many call it a spiritual war but can’t explain what that means. Many think they know the answer but can’t really articulate it for their friends. Many point their fingers to one group or another – but I believe it’s much much more complicated than that and I’m going to try to prove it to you.
UK, France, & Others GANG Up On Israel to recognize Imaginary Palestinian State [52:01]
September 21, 2025 JNS TV
The West’s Betrayal of Israel: Rewarding Hamas with a State [8:01] Avi Abelow
Sep 21, 2025
The West has shown its true face. By recognizing a so-called Palestinian state less than two years after the October 7th massacre, with our hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, the UK, Canada, and Australia have chosen to reward genocidal terror and betray the very values they claim to defend.
And then they recognized Islamist supremacy. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
The Red-Green Alliance is increasingly influencing leftist politics across the West — and Israel pays the price. No self-respecting diaspora Jew can trust the Left anymore.
SEP 21, 2025
At the very moment Jews are still reeling from the deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, three of the West’s leading democracies have decided to hand Hamas a political victory on a silver platter.
Today, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the United Kingdom’s recognition of a “Palestinian state” — minutes after similar declarations from Canada and Australia. If this weren’t reality, one would assume it was satire.
It is pure lunacy.
Defenders of the move will say “domestic political considerations” explain this rogue recognition, but that excuse doesn’t hold. According to two separate polls — one by France’s Representative Council of Jewish Institutions and another by JL Partners in Britain — over two-thirds of French citizens and nearly 90 percent of Britons oppose their governments’ recognition of a Palestinian state without preconditions. Ordinary citizens, unlike their political elites, understand that rewarding terror without demanding even the most basic concessions (such as the release of Israeli hostages or Hamas’ surrender) defies both common sense and common decency.
Starmer tried to reassure the public by declaring that “Hamas will have no future, no role in the Palestinian government or a role in security.”
But what if Palestinians want Hamas to have a role in their state?
You see, if the Palestinians are said to deserve their own state, and if democracy is universally praised as the best form of governance, then what happens if Hamas once again wins at the ballot box — just as it did in Gaza in 2006 — only to abolish future elections, entrench its rule by brutal force, and transform that “state” into a jihadist fortress? That is exactly what happened in Gaza, yielding years of bloodshed, multiple wars against Israel, and culminating in the atrocities of October 7th.
For decades, Palestinian society has elected, supported, or tolerated Hamas and its Islamist allies. Western “leaders” cannot pretend Palestinians are children who don’t know what they are doing. They are adults, perfectly capable of making decisions, and their decisions have overwhelmingly focused not on coexistence with Israel, but on rejecting the Jewish state’s existence and prioritizing destruction over statehood.
To see how misguided this approach is, one must recall the Oslo Accords. Signed in 1993 on the White House lawn, Oslo was presented as a historic breakthrough. It was born out of the First Intifada and years of secret negotiations in Norway.
Then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Palestinian leader (and mega-terrorist) Yasser Arafat, and U.S. President Bill Clinton shared a famous handshake that seemed to symbolize the dawn of peace. The agreement created the Palestinian Authority, which was granted limited self-rule in Gaza and parts of the West Bank. In return, the Palestine Liberation Organization recognized Israel’s right to exist, renounced terrorism — at least on paper — and pledged to resolve disputes peacefully. The world applauded, Nobel Prizes were awarded, and the narrative was set: Peace was finally within reach.
But the reality turned out very differently. Within months, suicide bombings began to tear through Israel’s buses and cafés, killing scores of civilians. The Palestinian Authority did not dismantle terror groups as promised. Instead, it quietly tolerated and even coordinated with them.
Arafat himself spoke one language in English to the West and another in Arabic to his people, where he compared Oslo to the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah: a temporary truce Muhammad signed with the Quraysh before breaking it when circumstances were more favorable. To Palestinians, this meant Oslo was never about peace; it was a tactical pause.
Palestinian textbooks continued to glorify violence, erase Israel from maps, and raise a generation taught that martyrdom was nobler than coexistence. Corruption within the Palestinian Authority grew rampant, with billions in international aid diverted into the pockets of Arafat’s cronies.
Terror groups like Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad flourished in the permissive environment Oslo created, gaining strength and legitimacy. When Bill Clinton presented Palestinians with an unprecedented offer of statehood in 2000, Arafat rejected it outright and launched the Second Intifada: a campaign of suicide bombings, lynchings, and shootings that left more than a thousand Israelis dead.
Out of that rubble, Hamas rose to power in Gaza. In 2006, Palestinians freely elected them in legislative elections. By 2007, Hamas had violently seized control of Gaza, throwing political rivals off rooftops and establishing a permanent base for terror.
Instead of turning Gaza into the “Singapore of the Middle East,” as optimists once predicted, Hamas turned it into a missile launch pad, its economy strangled not by Israel, but by the obsessive choice to prioritize tunnels and rockets over schools and jobs. Oslo had not delivered peace; it had delivered chaos, jihad, and the entrenchment of rejectionism.
It is worth remembering how Hamas came to power in the first place. In 2006, they won Palestinian legislative elections not by openly campaigning on jihad, but by promising “reforms” — an end to the rampant corruption and mismanagement of the Palestinian Authority. That appeal to accountability and change resonated with Palestinians who were tired of Arafat’s cronies siphoning off aid while their lives remained stagnant.
Hamas sold itself as the clean alternative. And now, nearly two decades later, Hamas can once again turn to the Palestinian electorate with an even more powerful argument: Look, we got you a state. Recognition by London, Ottawa, and Canberra hands them a political trophy to brandish as proof of their effectiveness. It will not weaken Hamas; it will strengthen them. What they once achieved by the promise of reform, they will now claim through the promise of results.
Hence why Western “leaders” today sound eerily like Neville Chamberlain in the 1930s, mistaking declarations and handshakes for guarantees of peace while underestimating the fanaticism of their adversaries. Chamberlain believed Hitler could be appeased with words on paper; he waved the Munich Agreement as proof of “peace for our time,” only to discover that Hitler never intended peace at all.
In the same way, Starmer, Carney, and Albanese speak as if Hamas can be willed away with diplomatic pronouncements, as though Palestinian society’s repeated embrace of rejectionist movements is some minor obstacle rather than the central problem. Just as Chamberlain underrated Hitler’s intentions, today’s leaders are underrating Hamas and the ideology it represents: an uncompromising dedication to Israel’s destruction. The result, if history is any guide, will not be peace, but catastrophe.
The only logical conclusion is that these Left-wing politicians are not acting out of strategic foresight or principled diplomacy, but out of domestic political cowardice. They are trying to appease their own radical base.
Many of today’s liberals and leftists often insist that the Far-Left does not truly represent their side of the political aisle. Yet when the moment comes, many of their leaders consistently make Far-Left choices to satisfy the very radicals they claim to keep at arm’s length. Starmer, Carney, and Albanese are not statesmen thinking about long-term peace or stability; they are politicians desperate to pacify vocal segments of their electorate.
And, so, we must be honest: The Far-Left is becoming today’s Left. The loudest, most uncompromising elements of their coalition are the ones setting the agenda.
Even worse, the Red-Green Alliance is hijacking today’s Left. By this, we mean the unholy pact between the radical Left (the “red” heirs of Marxist class struggle) and the Islamist movements symbolized by “green” (the color of political Islam).
At first glance, they seem like ideological opposites: one secular and revolutionary, the other religious and theocratic. Yet they share a common enemy: the West, liberal democracy, and above all, Israel and the Jewish People. Their marriage of convenience thrives on grievance politics, the exploitation of victimhood, and the weaponization of human rights language to advance illiberal, often totalitarian ends. What was once a fringe alliance on the margins of Western campuses and anti-war marches is now shaping the policy choices of entire Western countries.
No diaspora Jew in the West can look at a leftist party today and find safety in it. The mask has slipped. For all their rhetoric about tolerance and justice, these movements have chosen to side with those who glorify the murder of Jews. Once, Jews could at least hope that liberal parties would defend them against reactionary forces on the Right. Today, the imminent danger comes from the Left, where the obsession with “Palestine” has become a litmus test of ideological purity, and Jewish safety is dismissed as an inconvenient distraction.
In fact, what we are seeing today is Oslo Accords 2.0. The First Intifada delivered Oslo; the October 7th massacre has somehow delivered premature recognition of “Palestinian statehood.”
Once again, violence has preceded diplomatic reward. Once again, Western “leaders” are mistaking gestures for substance, projecting their own fantasies of compromise onto a society that has never demonstrated the willingness or ability to build a peaceful state alongside Israel. Once again, recognition is being offered without responsibility, sovereignty without accountability, and legitimacy without reform.
The consequences are not theoretical. By recognizing a “Palestinian state” now, Western governments are teaching Palestinians the worst possible lesson. Instead of incentivizing reform — dismantling terror networks, fighting corruption, and preparing their people for coexistence — this move sends the opposite message: Rejection is rewarded, violence pays, and sovereignty requires nothing in return.
That lesson will not remain confined to Ramallah and Gaza. Iran will celebrate this as vindication of its “axis of resistance.” Hezbollah will interpret it as proof that terrorism bends the will of the West. Jihadist groups elsewhere will be emboldened to escalate, convinced that mass violence followed by victimhood narratives remains the fastest road to legitimacy.
Even more obscene is the timing. Dozens of Israeli hostages remain in Hamas captivity, enduring unimaginable horrors. To recognize a Palestinian state in this moment is to tell their captors: Your crimes are irrelevant, your brutality carries no consequence. It erases the hostages, turning them into forgotten props in a Western morality play. This is not diplomacy; it is complicity.
Worse still, it represents a grotesque moral inversion. Israel is punished for defending itself against the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust, while Hamas is implicitly rewarded despite committing that slaughter. The democracies of the West are treating Israeli self-defense as provocation, while treating terror as entitlement. It is the UN’s twisted logic imported wholesale into Western foreign policy.
The truth is uncomfortable but undeniable: Palestinian society has not yet produced leadership willing — or even capable — of governing in peace with Israel. To recognize a state now, in the immediate aftermath of October 7th, is not just premature. It is reckless, delusional, and morally bankrupt.
If Oslo taught us anything, it is that wishful thinking in the West cannot substitute for reality in the Middle East. Recognition without responsibility leads not to peace, but to more bloodshed. And this time, with Hamas emboldened and the West rewarding rejectionism yet again, the costs will be even higher.
Ed.: I would think that if we decimated them, and eliminated them completely as we were instructed over and over in our Torah, these same shickse Western nations would have no ‘Balastinian State’ to recognize, or reward. …Just a thought.
The Tide is Turning [3:10] JEROME R. CORSI, PH.D.
Drug Shipments Are Being Destroyed, Dems Illegal Campaign Contributions Uncovered
SEP 21, 2025 Corsi Nation
Trump sent National Guard to Memphis Tennessee to restore law and order, prepares to send troops to battlezone Chicago.
National emergency declaration regarding our Democrat stolen elections coming soon?
France In Total COLLAPSE! [9:06] Jeff Taylor
Sep 19, 2025 Politics Latest
The French people have had enough of their politicians and are slowly shutting their country down! How long before we see this in the UK?!
🚨 LIVE: Chaos In Paris As Communists RIOT And ATTACK Police [27:30] Mahyar Tousi
September 19, 2025 Tousi TV
An Actual Demon?! Candace Owens’ Obsession With the Jews Has Gone Too Far [5:41] Mansur Ashkar
War numbers, the most powerful weapon against Israel Giulio Meotti
Those Zionist magicians have allegedly killed more children than there were in the Gaza Strip before the war. Just read the numbers we are being fed Opinion.
Sep 19, 2025, 12:43 PM (GMT+3) Israel National News
“65,000 is the number of Palestinian Arabs killed with certainty, 75 percent of whom were women and children. But we should start thinking about 680,000, because this is the number some scholars and scientists claim is the true death toll in Gaza”.
We are in Geneva, at the UN Palace of Nations, and the speaker is Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories. Any doubts have been dispelled about the 65,000 deaths in Gaza, “of whom 75 percent were women and children,” a figure that has been repeated since October 8, 2023, when Israel’s military response to the Hamas pogrom began. According to Albanese, a leading figure among Palestinian Arab activists, the number is on the order of ten times that number, before adding that the figures – any ot them – cannot be verified.
War numbers are the most powerful weapon against Israel, more than rockets and bullets: if Hamas is losing in Gaza, it is winning in the West.
The latest anti-Israeli truth spreading like wildfire is the claim that 680,000 people were killed in Gaza during the nearly two-year war between Israel and Hamas, “including 380,000 children under the age of five.” The claim stems from an article titled “Skewering History: The Odious Politics of Counting Gaza’s Dead,” published in Arena, a far-left Australian magazine. The claim that 380,000 children under the age of five died during the war isn’t just absurd; it’s ridiculous, since the latest estimate of Gaza’s population under the age of five before the war was 341,790. Therefore, this “study” would claim that Israel has killed more children under the age of five than there are in the Gaza Strip.
The macabre magic of Zionism.
These numbers are certainly more genocidal, certified by the UN commission headed by Navi Pillay, already discredited for calling Israel “apartheid.” All major media outlets have promoted the genocide accusations contained in a report by three completely discredited commissioners—Pillay, Miloon Kothari, and Chris Sidoti—members of the UN Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry on the Palestinian Territories. The Council’s member countries, let’s remember, are the great democracies and human rights advocates Cuba, Qatar, China, Sudan, Algeria, Bolivia, Kuwait, Burundi, Vietnam, Kyrgyzstan, and Bangladesh. According to this commission, 83 percent of the deaths in Gaza are civilians, citing an article in the Guardian as proof.
In May, one of the most grotesque and easily refutable claims during the war between Israel and Hamas emerged: the claim that 14,000 children in Gaza would die within 48 hours. Tom Fletcher, UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, blurted out: “There are 14,000 children who will die in the next 48 hours if we don’t reach them. I want to save as many as possible in the next 48 hours.”
A bit like the “journalists” killed in Gaza. Suffice it to say that of the 192 journalists allegedly killed in Gaza and listed by Reporters Without Borders, 26 were employed by al-Aqsa TV (a Hamas channel), 19 by al-Quds al-Youm (Islamic Jihad), seven by Palestine Today (pro-Islamic Jihad), six by al-Mayadeen or al-Manar (the former affiliated with Hezbollah and the latter owned by Hezbollah), and another 23 by outlets linked to terrorist groups such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Houthis. Nearly half of the journalists identified so far worked for terrorist organizations.
Today we read that Israel has already killed a third of Gaza’s total population (math must not have been taught at the UN – who are all those people streaming southward from Gaza City?).
Tomorrow we will read that Gaza is worse than Pol Pot’s Cambodia, but with the Green Khmers playing the roles of victims and resisters.
[Ed.:
The Significance of the Recently Released Russia Hoax Documents by Mollie Hemingway | Editor-in-Chief, The Federalist
SEPTEMBER 2025 | IMPRIMIS VOLUME 54, ISSUE 9
Within hours of her 2016 presidential campaign loss, a devastated Hillary Clinton attributed her defeat not to the American voters who rejected her, but to Russia, echoing a campaign theme she had been developing for months. “Hillary declined to take responsibility for her own loss” and “kept pointing her finger” at Russia, according to Shattered, a 2017 book about her campaign—“Her team coalesced around the idea that Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign.”
The corporate media were also devastated, as they had spent the entire campaign mocking the idea that Trump and his anti-establishment positions on foreign policy, trade, and wokeness could appeal to voters. To the extent possible, they would help promote Clinton’s blame game.
In early January 2017, the Clinton campaign’s “Steele dossier”—a secretly funded collection of made-up stories and gossip alleging that Russia had dirt on Trump and that Trump was colluding with Russia against the United States—was published. Washington would be consumed by the Russia collusion hoax for the next two-and-a-half years. The investigations it spurred would bankrupt Trump associates, destroy lives, and hamstring Trump’s ability to govern. It led to draconian censorship campaigns against conservatives. It hurt Republicans in the 2018 midterm elections and the 2020 general election. But no evidence was found that a single American, much less Trump himself, conspired with Russia.
Fast forward to today. Six months into Trump’s second term, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have declassified and released long-suppressed documents detailing how President Obama and his spy chiefs laundered the Steele dossier and other falsehoods in an attempt to destroy Trump’s first presidency. The response from Democrats, the media, and many establishment Republicans has been to say that these suppressed documents contain nothing new or significant. Not true.
The Russia collusion hoax was anchored to two central claims: first, that Trump was a compromised agent of Russia, and second, that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump. The first claim was completely debunked after years of investigation. It is on the second and far more plausible claim—which was just as key to the hoax—that the newly released documents shed new light. And the revelations are shocking.
The documents show that in early December 2016, the intelligence community planned to publish a top secret presidential daily brief holding that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.” Once published, this brief would have been read by Obama and his top officials, as well as President-Elect Trump and his designated National Security Advisor, Lt. General Michael Flynn. But the day before publication, the FBI—which had co-authored the brief—announced that it was pulling its support for the brief and would be drafting a dissent. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence announced that the brief would be held for the following week.
In the end, the brief was never published. Instead, Obama ordered his top spy chiefs to put together an Intelligence Community Assessment—known as an ICA—on “Russia election meddling.” The chiefs were directed to look at how Moscow sought to influence the 2016 election—including with hacking, leaks, cyber activity against voting systems, and “fake news”—and to answer the questions, “Why did Moscow direct these activities?” and “What have the Russians hoped to accomplish?”
Prior to this order from Obama, the spy agencies had assessed that Russia’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election were consistent with Russia’s previous and long-standing election-year meddling and cyber-hacking efforts. They found that Russia’s goal was to mess with and decrease confidence in U.S. elections, rather than help elect particular candidates. But on the evening of December 9, 2016, The Washington Post published a story sourced to unnamed senior Obama officials claiming that the CIA had “concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.” That was a lie. The process by which such assessments are made by the CIA hadn’t taken place, much less concluded anything. The same false information was leaked to The New York Times: “American intelligence agencies,” it reported, “have concluded with ‘high confidence’ that Russia acted covertly . . . to harm Hillary Clinton’s chances and promote Donald J. Trump, according to senior administration officials.” Both papers were awarded Pulitzers the next year for their willingness to participate, without a bit of skepticism, in this disinformation operation.
A few days later, Obama poured gasoline on the fire by publicly expressing concern that “potential hacking . . . could hamper vote counting and affect the actual election process itself.” Meanwhile, behind the scenes, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, and FBI Director James Comey were working furiously to throw together the ICA Obama had ordered. Typically, such an assessment would take a minimum of several months and include a wide variety of perspectives. This ICA was prepared in two weeks using only five CIA staffers to draft it. Comey, Brennan, and Clapper overruled strenuous objections from senior intelligence officials who were aghast at the inclusion of unsubstantiated claims and unverified gossip. Some who complained had their promotions threatened. Others were told they were not privy to secret intelligence reviewed only by top leadership.
The finished ICA was reported on to Obama on January 5, 2017, and to Trump the next day. In addition to findings that were credible and substantiated, the report said Putin had developed “a clear preference” for Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory.” It also included, contrary to the public testimony of Obama’s spy chiefs, a two-page summary of the Clinton campaign’s Steele dossier in the most classified version of the report. Comey met privately with Trump at the end of his briefing to tell him about unverified allegations that Russia held proof of salacious sexual and financial impropriety on the part of Trump. Four days later, CNN reported extensively on the meeting and what Trump was told. At this point, the Russia hoax was fully operational and would do severe damage to our country for years to come.
***
One document Ratcliffe released is a “tradecraft review” of the January 2017 ICA. Conducted by career officials at the CIA, the review found that the dishonest leaks by the Obama administration in December 2016 created an “anchoring bias” that polluted the entire document. The review also expressed concern about the ICA’s frantic production timeline; the refusal to allow analysts reviewing the document to see the intelligence its conclusions were based on; and the over-involvement of Comey, Brennan, and Clapper. It found that the assessment gave a “higher confidence level than was justified” to the claim that Russia preferred Trump and that it was tainted by a “potential political motive.”
Gabbard released an even more explosive report. Authored in 2017 and 2018 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes, it had been hidden in a top secret vault for seven years. It conclusively debunked the ICA’s “key judgement” about Putin’s preference for Trump, excoriated the ICA for using the preposterous Steele dossier as a basis for its claims, and detailed how the views of career intelligence officials were overruled and dismissed.
Brennan had long publicly claimed that he had secret knowledge—separate and apart from the Steele dossier—to support his view that Russia interfered to help Trump. In August and September 2016, he had individually briefed the “Gang of Eight,” the top Senate and House officials who oversee the CIA, and it turned out that Brennan’s so-called secret knowledge was laughable. It was based mostly on three reports that “contained flawed information” and “became foundational sources” for the claim that Putin aspired to help Trump. Veteran CIA officers had said the reports “contained substandard information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, implausible,” and “odd.”
Brennan hadn’t allowed some of the information to go through normal vetting procedures when it was collected. And he “personally directed that two of the most important reports not be formally disseminated when he first learned of them,” supposedly because they were so sensitive—a questionable explanation given that the CIA has a special reporting channel for sensitive reports that are restricted to the president and other named individuals.
The only classified information cited in the ICA for the claim that Putin “aspired to help Trump’s chances of victory” was a fragment of a sentence that came from someone who did not personally know Putin. The fragment, consisting of the words, “whose victory Putin was counting on,” had been collected prior to the July 2016 Republican National Convention. So who could even know to which victory it referred? Furthermore, it is not known whether the fragment reflected the sub-source’s opinion of Putin’s thinking, Putin’s actual statements to his sub-source, or the views of someone else reflecting on Putin’s thinking to the sub-source. Its meaning was so unclear that “five people read it five ways,” according to the report.
For these reasons, experienced CIA officers initially omitted the fragment from the ICA. But Brennan ordered that it be included. One senior CIA officer, alarmed that it was the only evidence offered for the ICA’s main conclusion, noted the lack of “direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected.” The ICA also failed to address the strong anti-Trump bias on the part of the source of the fragment.
The ICA claimed that “a Russian political expert possessed a plan that recommended engagement with [Trump’s] team because of the prospects for improved US-Russian relations.” This claim was viewed as “lacking authoritativeness” and the CIA decided not to publish the intelligence even internally when they received it in February 2016. That’s probably because the so-called “plan” was in fact only an anonymous email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification”—not to mention that it was passed along by a foreign country with a noted anti-Trump bias.
The ICA then claimed that Putin’s inner circle “strongly preferred Republican over Democratic candidates because they judged that Republicans had historically been less focused on democracy and human rights.” The phrase “strongly preferred Republican” never appeared in the raw intelligence report and the ultimate source for the claim is unknown. What’s more, the claim that Republicans cared less about democracy and human rights in Russia was implausible. The Select Committee report noted that President Reagan was famous for his “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall” speech, but a myriad of other examples could be cited.
The ICA claimed that the “clear preference” report was corroborated by liaison, diplomatic, and press reporting, when in fact none of that was true. The liaison reporting was from 2014 and “didn’t mention Trump at all.” The diplomatic report was a post-election overview from the U.S. ambassador noting that a Russian pundit said Trump and Putin should “work together like businessmen,” hardly corroboration for the claim that Putin’s inner circle preferred Republicans. Indeed, that same ambassador’s note quoted a Russian foreign minister saying that “we do not feel any euphoria” about Trump’s win.
The ICA also omitted intelligence that Putin was telling people he “did not care who won the election,” that he had “outlined the weaknesses of both major candidates,” and that Russia was “strategically placed to outmaneuver either [candidate].” If anything, Russia was preparing for Clinton’s victory and felt she was more predictable. The Kremlin worried that Trump officials would “likely adhere to conservative anti-Russian positions.” Putin “took exception” to a “favorable view” of Trump and said there was “no basis for enthusiasm” for Trump.
The original New York Times report on the CIA’s assessment said that although Russia had allegedly hacked both Republicans and Democrats, it had only released Democrats’ embarrassing emails. In fact, the CIA had no evidence that Russia held embarrassing emails or information on Republicans. It did have evidence that Russia had embarrassing information on Clinton that was never released. This included the fact that Obama and other party leaders thought Clinton’s health to be “extraordinarily alarming,” that Clinton was suffering from “intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness,” and perhaps that she had been placed on “heavy tranquilizers.” If Putin favored Trump, it would be odd not to have released this information in the closing days of the campaign.
The use of weak, disputed, and contradicted intelligence to make the claim about Russia preferring Trump wasn’t the only problem with the ICA. Its use of the Steele dossier was another. Brennan lied publicly when he testified to Congress on May 23, 2017, that the dossier “was not in any way used as a basis for the [ICA] that was done.” Not only was it cited as the fourth bullet point of “evidence” that “Putin aspired to help Trump,” it was falsely described as “Russian plans and intentions” and having come from “an FBI source.” The dossier was presented in a two-page summary that implied some of its findings had been corroborated, misrepresenting “both the significance and credibility” of the dossier, according to the Select Committee report. Further, by hiding the dossier summary in the highest classified version, the Obama spy chiefs were “better able to shield the assessment from scrutiny.”
The documents released by Ratcliffe and Gabbard show that career officers were pleading with their bosses not to assert, falsely, that Russia preferred Trump and not to include the Steele dossier in any way, shape, or form. One wrote: “Based solely on what we DO know now, my bottom line is this—unless FBI is prepared to provide much better sourcing—I believe this should NOT be included in the paper.” Noting that the document had not been formally issued as an FBI product, this same official characterized it as suffering from “POOR SOURCE TRADECRAFT,” as having “extremely sketchy” sourcing, and as failing to “meet normal [intelligence community] standards.”
Career senior intelligence officials worried about the dossier’s author being funded by an anti-Trump entity, even though they didn’t yet know that the funding came from the Clinton campaign. They also worried about the lack of transparency regarding the dossier’s sub-sources—a concern validated weeks later when the FBI finally got around to interviewing primary sub-source Igor Danchenko, a Russian national the FBI had suspected of being a spy, and determined that the salacious allegations in the dossier lacked any credibility. Despite this, the FBI defended the use of the dossier for years and hid Danchenko’s identity from Congress by hiring him as a confidential informant—a ruse allowing them to claim that revealing his identity would endanger ongoing investigations.
When Comey insisted that the information in the document was good, one intelligence official wondered why, if so, it hadn’t been used against Trump during the campaign. Including the Steele dossier in the ICA, this official added, would be like taking supermarket tabloids seriously. Pointing to a December 12, 2016, National Enquirer story headlined, “Muslim Spies in Obama’s CIA,” he asked rhetorically if that report should be included in an ICA as well.
Confronted by a reviewer who wrote that there was “no intelligence to directly support” the claim that Russia aspired to help Trump, and that making the claim would “open the [intelligence community] to a line of very politicized inquiry that is sure to come up when this paper is shared with the Hill,” Brennan called him and another dissenting official into his office and told them he knew better. Confronted with demands from senior officials that the Steele dossier not be included, Brennan insisted it stay in. “[D]oesn’t it ring true?” he asked.
***
In the wake of these recent document releases, the Department of Justice announced in July that it had formed a strike force—a means of allowing federal investigators across multiple agencies to pursue criminals engaged in conspiracies. An unnamed federal prosecutor began securing additional documents from the spy agencies. After collecting the necessary documents, the federal prosecutor will begin speaking with whistleblowers and others with knowledge about how the Russia hoax operation was run. Once his team has a clear picture, they will bring in some of the targets of the investigation for interviews. With the statute of limitations at five years for most of these potential crimes, the Department of Justice may have to show that the conspiracy against Trump is ongoing, a task made easier by the fact that some of Obama’s spy chiefs continue to defend their actions.
Back in January 2017, three days before he was briefed on the Steele dossier, Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer warned President-Elect Trump against criticizing the FBI and the CIA. “Let me tell you,” he said, “you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.”
Thanks to Trump’s victory last November, it may be Obama’s spy chiefs who will regret taking on Trump.
The truth about why the US had to overthrow the ‘autocratic’ Assad regime and replace it with a group of Christophobic Islamic butchers
SEP 18, 2025
NOTE FROM LEO: Dear friends, the below article gives important history on the destruction of ancient Christian communities in Syria that I hope you will share with your friends and family. Meanwhile, if you appreciate these updates, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. This lets me know you value my independent reporting and analysis on issues that matter — war and peace, the surveillance state, globalism, etc. Some in my audience have canceled their subscriptions because they cannot handle any criticism of President Trump. I need those who appreciate honest and factual reporting, regardless of who it offends, to make up the difference. If you can afford $7 a month or $80 a year, please stand in the gap for me. Thank you and God bless.
The Associated Press reports that Syria’s foreign minister was in Washington on Thursday, September 18, “kicking off the first official visit to the United States by a top Syrian official in 25 years as the new government in Damascus struggles to recover from the civil war and boost relations with the West following the fall of autocrat Bashar Assad.”
The new Syrian government is filled with bloodthirsty Sunni jihadists, but the sick implication of the AP’s article is that they’re pro-Western, so it doesn’t matter.
Assad was backed by Russia and thus, in the eyes of the AP, he must be described as “autocratic.” While it’s true Assad was autocratic, all Arab leaders are autocratic and using this word to describe him doesn’t give the complete picture or context. Assad was in fact a protector of the Christian and Alawite religious minorities in Syria. He held off the dogs — the bloodthirsty Sunnis — and when he was overthrown with the help of Israeli and Western intelligence agencies, it became open season on Alawites and Christians. This is a fact the American neocons don’t want you to know.
Richard Ghazal lays out the sad story of Syria’s Christians in a July 7 op-ed for The Hill titled “The vanishing Christians of Syria: A crisis the world cannot ignore.”
But the AP can’t help itself. It can’t report the truth about Syria because it’s so tightly connected to the false narratives perpetrated by the U.S. military-industrial-intelligence complex, which is part of the neoconservative/neoliberal warmongering establishment in Washington. This establishment is inherently pro-Israel, but it’s also stridently pro-Sunni jihadist and anti-Russian. That’s why neocon Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham traveled to Syria in February 2012 and communicated to the Sunni tribes there that they had the backing of the West in their desires to overthrow Assad. From that point on, Syria disintegrated further and further into bloody civil war.
According to Ghazal’s article in The Hill, prior to the start of the Syrian Civil War, “Christians made up approximately 10 percent of Syria’s population and played key roles in academia, medicine, commerce and in public life. They coexisted with their Muslim neighbors to preserve a fragile but buoyant multiethnic, multiconfessional social fabric.”
The civil war, however, shattered this pluralistic order. Today, fewer than 300,000 Christians remain in Syria, down from roughly 2 million prior to the war.
To this day, I shudder whenever I hear a conservative pundit portray Putin as just another oldline KGB communist. The hatred of Russia has nothing to do with communism and everything to do with the struggle to maintain U.S./U.K./E.U. hegemonic control over the Middle East and the world. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, until it is, and that’s when U.S./Western adventurism triggers the slaughter of ancient Christian communities in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and elsewhere.
Putin is no doubt an authoritarian leader, a nationalist and a pragmatist who gravitates to policies that magnify his grip on power.
In other words, one could make the argument that Putin is very nearly a Russian version of Donald Trump. He likes power. He wields it unapolagetically, austensibly for the betterment of his country’s standing in the world. But he’s no communist. Get over it all you gals and guys working in the well-funded think tanks with your heads still firmly entrenched in the 1980s. If Putin was a communist he would not be vilified day in and day out by the liberal Western media in the U.S., U.K., Germany and France. He would not have been protecting Syria’s Christians.
Interestingly, when Russia was communist, the AP, The New York Times, The Guardian and other liberal Western news agencies treated them much better and gave them much less hostile coverage.
Thursday’s jubilent AP report reflected its giddiness that “Washington has steadily been easing sanctions imposed on Syria under Assad since after U.S. President Donald Trump met interim Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia in May — a key event that set Syria’s new authorities on the path to end decades of international isolation.”
Trump signed an executive order in June ending most of the U.S. economic sanctions on Syria, following through on a promise he made to the new Syrian president during their meeting. John McCain would be proud. Lindsey Graham is toasting the president and offering to pay for their next round of golf.
So the picture is clear. For all willing to see it. Align with Russia and you get branded a vicious dictator and are economically isolated by the West. Align with the U.S. and no matter how brutal you are to your own people, particularly Christians, you get an invite to the White House with offers of lucrative trade deals.
The new Syrian foreign minister, Asaad al-Shibani, earlier this year attended meetings with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, two of the major tools of Western hegemony used to shower friendly regimes with loans and financial goodies. He was also invited to New York where he held talks at the United Nations. Syria is now a member in good standing of the “international community,” aka modern Babylon. The Christian blood on the Syrian regime’s hands matters not. All that matters is they’ve agreed not to do business with Russia and to kiss the ring of Washington’s neocons while inviting in Western corporations to rebuild their war-torn nation. The Western corporations will be paid largely with loans that Syria’s new government gets from the IMF and World Bank. See how the scam works?
Comments
Comments are closed.