Daily Shmutz 1/12/23 – ELECTIONS

ELECTIONS

2.  Georgia Court Reinstates VoterGA’s Case Requesting an Audit of 147,000 Mail-In Ballots in the 2020 Election   By Joe Hoft

January 12, 2023 at 3:50pm – Georgia’s Court of Appeals reinstated VoterGA’s Fulton County counterfeit ballot case looking to reverse its previous lack of standing ruling against VoterGA.

It looks like VoterGA will soon be allowed to audit the 147,000 absentee ballots counted in Fulton County in the 2020 Election.

We reported this weeks ago when the Georgia Supreme Court agreed that VoterGA had standing in its request to audit the 147,000 absentee ballots in Fulton County from the 2020 Election.

 

1.   REVEALED… Natalie Winters: Arizona Was The “Main State” Where CCP-Connected Carter Center Monitored Midterm Election – Group Has Monitored Over 100 Elections in 39 Countries Including BRAZIL (VIDEO)   By Jordan Conradson

January 12, 2023 at 8:30am – Investigative reporter Natalie Winters joined Bannon’s War Room Monday to discuss the Chinese Communist Party-funded Carter Center’s involvement in a “globalist and a global concerted effort” in the United States elections and Brazil’s recent election.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported on the Carter Center, who claim to be nonpartisan election observers, and their potentially illegal involvement in Georgia.

“Arizona was their main state,” said Winters.

TRENDING: In Ukraine, “There’s Something Happening There”

According to a report on the War Room website, “The Carter Center has been conducting “election observation” missions for over 100 elections across 39 countries.

Winters told Bannon that in Brazil, the Carter Center was “given sole access to really vet these machines before they were used.”

If this occurred in Maricopa County, one of the Carter Center’s “primary targets,” that may explain the catastrophe that occurred on Election Day.

Total Page Visits: 246
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.