ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / AI (Building a Control Grid)
France Opens Criminal Probe After Grok AI Pushes Holocaust Lies
November 23, 2025 Jewish Breaking News
French prosecutors have expanded a criminal investigation into Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok after the bot generated French-language responses reviving one of the most notorious tropes in Holocaust denial.
The exchange, posted in a thread by a Holocaust denier, went further by asserting that cyanide residues in the ruins were “minimal” and “consistent with decontamination but not with repeated homicidal gassings.” Holocaust historians said the argument echoed the debunked Leuchter Report, a pseudo-forensic document that experts have long rejected as fraudulent.
On November 17, when a user asked the purpose of Auschwitz’s gas chambers, Grok replied in French that the crematorium plans showed facilities “designed for disinfection with Zyklon B against typhus.”
The post further claimed that cyanide residue in the gas chambers was “minimal” and matched “decontamination use, not repeated mass gassings.”
Grok later issued a correction in German, calling its previous answer “false” and blaming “an anomalous glitch in early output” and “unfiltered training data.” In other replies, the bot denied having made the claim at all. xAI has not publicly explained the contradictory statements.
The Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial responded within hours, calling the bot’s remarks “a disgraceful assault on the memory” of the more than 1.1 million victims murdered there. Historians point to architectural blueprints and surviving German documents showing that the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau were purpose-built for mass murder, including undressing rooms, vents for inserting Zyklon B, ventilation systems, corpse elevators and high-capacity cremation ovens.
The Paris Public Prosecutor’s Office confirmed that the incident has been added to an ongoing cybercrime probe into X and its algorithmic systems. Investigators are examining whether Grok’s outputs violate France’s Holocaust denial statute and whether X’s algorithm is being manipulated for foreign interference or unlawful automated data extraction. Two civil-rights groups, SOS Racisme and the Human Rights League, also announced they will file criminal complaints.
Earlier this year, xAI removed posts in which the bot appeared to praise Adolf Hitler after users flagged antisemitic language. Musk said at the time that Grok had become “too compliant to user prompts” and was “too eager to please and be manipulated,” adding that the problem was being addressed.
AI is rewriting the Holocaust — and history at large. JASON STEINHAUER
A flood of AI-generated “memory” is replacing lived memory, expertise, and historical fact.
NOV 20, 2025 The Future of Jewish
Fazal Rahman lives in Pakistan and, up until recently, had never heard of the Holocaust. When asked by the BBC about the event, he confessed he did not know what the term meant. Yet he was familiar with images of it — AI-generated images, that is.
Rahman is part of a network of Pakistani content creators who use artificial intelligence applications to generate fictitious images of historical events, including the Holocaust. They principally post on Facebook, where their pages have amassed hundreds of thousands of followers.
For producing content that generates a high number of interactions, such as AI-generated Holocaust imagery, they can earn $1,000 per month as part of Facebook’s content monetization program. The more clicks, views, and shares their content gets, the more they get paid — particularly if their content is consumed by higher-income audiences in the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe. For Rahman, it has become his sole source of income.
How would someone such as Rahman, who’d never heard of the Holocaust, get the idea to post AI-generated Holocaust imagery?
They ask ChatGPT. According to the BBC investigation, creators inside these content groups use AI chatbots to determine which historical events create high-performing social media content. The Holocaust was one of the answers.
Since 2022, there has been growing discussion about how artificial intelligence applications such as large language models, image generators, and chatbots will affect “history” — both the professional discipline of history and public understandings of the past. In 2025, the contours of that influence are now visible. AI applications are being used around the world in dozens of history-related contexts. A shortlist includes:
- An exhibition at the White House about America’s “Founding Fathers” and “Founding Mothers,” curated by PragerU, which includes historical portraits that morph into AI-generated video clips, activated by scanning a QR code
- Game designers, such as in the Netherlands, incorporating AI-generated historical imagery into their games, trying to, in their words, “leverage the potential of AI to bring history to life”
- Historians and researchers in multiple countries using tools such as Google’s NotebookLM (a research and note-taking tool) to summarize and synthesize scholarly literature, as well as take notes and arrange book chapters
- Reviewers of peer review journals, in some instances, using ChatGPT or large language models to author their assessments of scholarly articles
- Holocaust museums, and other sites of conscience, using hologram technology coupled with AI to simulate conversations with deceased witnesses and survivors of past events
- Conservators and historic preservationists in Italy, Greece, India, and China using AI to reconstruct destroyed archaeological sites or damaged cultural artifacts such as paintings, sculptures, and mosaics
- Hitler speeches and writings translated by AI, remixed and propagated on social media set to background music
- The current U.S. presidential administration using AI to generate a list of history books with perceived offensive keywords in their titles and removing them from library shelves at the U.S. Naval Academy
- University presses licensing their books to train large language models
- Museums and universities establishing policies and procedures for using AI in the workplace
- Approximately one-third of professors across disciplines, including history, describing themselves as frequent users of generative AI tools, including developing lesson plans, making lecture slides, and designing custom chatbots that answer student questions
- Students in classrooms worldwide using ChatGPT and other large language models to author homework assignments, historical essays, and, at least in one case, write a PhD dissertation
The proliferation of uses of AI in historical or history-adjacent spaces prompted the New York Times to publish an article in June, titled “A.I. Is Poised to Rewrite History. Literally.” Presumably in response, at least in part, the American Historical Association released its “Guiding Principles for Artificial Intelligence in History Education” shortly after.
Though only two months old, the Association document, while laudable, already feels like an artifact, staking a claim to land that has experienced a seismic continental drift. It asserts several times that AI cannot replace history teachers or professors. The wider world seems to disagree. Over the summer, Microsoft released their top 40 occupations with the “highest AI applicability score.” Historians were number two, behind only interpreters and translators, with a “coverage” score of 0.91 out 1. According to the second largest corporation in the world (by market capitalization), most of what historians do can be replicated or outsourced to machines, either now or in the future.
The tool History.AI is here, then — and with it, the likely alteration of the history profession as it has been practiced for decades. What it becomes is still to be determined. While some observers and traditionalists had held out hope that AI might be a passing fad, akin to the laser-disc or the unicycle, that appears unlikely. Much as AI applications and advancements will alter medicine, law, marketing and science, so, too, will they alter “history” in all its manifestations.
White House crafting executive order to thwart state AI laws
November 20, 2025 Yeshiva World News
* A draft executive order that could soon be signed by President Donald Trump would challenge states’ efforts to enact their own artificial intelligence laws.
* The order would establish an AI taskforce to launch lawsuits and threaten federal funding for states with contested AI laws.
* AI industry leaders including Sam Altman’s OpenAI and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz oppose a state-by-state policy approach.
Join a YWN Live Alerts Community for Live Breaking News Updates!
Can Artificial Intelligence Practice Medicine? PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Basic records fetching, assembly, and presentation required well before assisting in diagnosis and treatment.
NOV 20, 2025
A new paper landed in my inbox today titled: Software as a Medical Practitioner—Is It Time to License Artificial Intelligence? by Bressman et al from Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. The paper tackles the usual questions of licensing, responsibility, and liability as it applies to software tools used in clinical practice.
No doubt artificial intelligence is playing an ever-increasing role in medicine. From my perspective this paper speculates on a late step in the evolution of AI, not the first steps. Here is what Bressman et al is missing for AI:
- Obtaining permission for record gathering from disparate health systems, clinics, labs and imaging services
- Assembly of all information into a personal health timeline
- Creation, registration, and patient set up of electronic medical records
- Structured interviews
- Synthesis of information for presentation to doctor or other healthcare provider
It’s important that AI enthusiasts to remain grounded in the very basic blocking and tackling in medicine. So far not a single AI program has proposed yet accomplished these five tasks in their entirety.
When the biometric digital ID and digital-programmable money are implemented, there will be no going back. Freedom as we know it will be dead.
NOV 10, 2025
Financial and technology writer Shanaka Perera posted a Substack that says the European Union is fast-tracking the most comprehensive reconstruction of its monetary system since the euro’s introduction in 1999. The plan is to have it in place and fully operational by 2027. The old deadline for the Great Reset of 2030 is no longer good enough. They’ve moved it up.
He writes:
“By 2027, a regulatory trinity, cash transaction caps, mandatory cryptocurrency surveillance, and a digital euro prototype, will fundamentally alter how 340 million citizens interact with money. The stated objective is combating an estimated 700 billion euros in annual money laundering. The unstated consequence may be the de facto elimination of financial privacy in the world’s second-largest economy.”
Perera gives a comprehensive breakdown of the European plan to replace cash with digital, programmable money. I wish he would have gone further and talked about more than just Europe. This issue of digitization is so much bigger than Europe.
While the timetables may differ slightly, depending on the country, this is a transformation that’s taking place, not just in Europe, but globally.
Canada is going down the same route. (See Nov. 10 Slay News report that Canada’s federal government is quietly moving forward with a national digital ID system, slipping the plan into the depths of its 2025 budget where almost no one would notice.)
Donald Trump has openly stated that the U.S. monetary system is overdue for a technological “upgrade.” Trump says the current system of money, based on coinage, paper fiat currency and paper checks, i.e. cash, is “decades out of date.” Watch below:
You don’t have to read too closely between the lines to know the “upgrade” that Trump is talking about. Digital currency here we come. Trump signed the Genius Act earlier this year, making it easier for banks to issue digital Stablecoins. Trump has also called for a “proper tracking system” for all people entering and leaving the U.S., something that sounds an awful lot like the beginnings of a digital ID.
So the entire world is gravitating toward an all-new economic system based on digital IDs, digital and programmable money, and 24/7 surveillance of all transactions in real time. Some nations will lead. Others will follow, and a few might bring up the rear while kicking and screaming, but this is the direction in which all nations are being herded by the financial powers that be.
Christians, many of them, won’t want to admit that this is the beast system they are submitting to when they sign up for their digital wallet using their new biometric digital ID. But that’s what it is. And once we enter the system, there will be no going back.
As Perera points out, the new system is being brought into place under largely false pretenses. They say it’s to protect us from financial fraud, money laundering and identity theft. Everything will run faster and smoother in the new “upgraded” system.
You, too, can become an upgraded transhuman and all will go well for you. Just trust us!
It’s always for our safety and security. Throw in convenience and you have the unholy trinity of lying wonders, meant to entice, to deceive, to draw you in of your own volition. Because true worship cannot be forced. You must choose it. The system much prefers that you choose it, rather than take you by force like the old Marxist communists would do.
Perera writes:
“These mechanisms, when operational, will create an unprecedented system of financial traceability, one that European institutions insist protects citizens, but which critics warn could establish infrastructure for comprehensive economic surveillance.”
The new monetary system operates through three interlocking components:
- The elimination of all cash transactions, with paper fiat currency gradually being phased out of existence.
- Cryptocurrency identification requirements, which means a biometric digital ID will be mandated for all participants in the new economy.
- And, finally, after the fiat currency has been sufficiently debased and made evermore worthless, a new digital euro (or dollar) will replace it.
It’s all being done in typical Orwellian style. Government and financial elites will bend over backwards to assure us that privacy and security are their utmost concerns.
In reality, it’s the opposite.
The government will know everything you buy, when you bought it, what you paid and to whom. It will know your entire health history, including whether you’re up to date on your shots. This is for the purpose, not of safety and security, but a new form of tyranny where everyone will be assigned a social credit score in a new system of rewards and punishments.
Your rights will be wiped away. Replaced by government and corporate-bestowed privileges. It won’t happen overnight. It will be done gradually, and incrementally, one at a time.
Liberty Conservative News observes that:
“From a pro-liberty perspective, this is more than a technical issue — it’s a civilizational one. The essence of freedom is the ability to make choices for oneself, guided by reason, conscience, and consent. When algorithms quietly filter what people see, recommend what they should buy, or even decide which political messages reach them, they begin to substitute machine logic for human judgment.
“The danger isn’t that machines are evil. It’s that they are powerful — and answer to no one. Their rules are written by unelected engineers, their operations hidden behind corporate secrecy, and their outcomes dictated by data models that can be nudged, biased, or weaponized by those in power.”
Joe Allen, the prolific expert on technocracy and transhumanism, has described the system the globalists are trying to herd us into as an “algocracy,” or “government by algorithm.”
Patrick Wood, another great expert on technocracy, says the conversion to AI-powered, data center-driven digitization is not at all like previous technological transformations. One of the favorite comparisons being made by the proponents of digital everything is the farmer switching from the horse-drawn plow to the motorized tractor. It all worked out for the betterment of mankind. Just go with the flow and, after an initial painful transition, everything will work itself out for the best, they say.
Wood disagrees. He writes:
“AI is not like tractors that replaced farmers, an irrelevant analogy. Tractors were not anti-human, and their manufacturers weren’t lunatic disruptors trying to destroy the world. Arch-Technocrat Marc Andreessen last February predicted that ‘AI will crash wages’ and hence, crash prices of all goods and services, bringing about Utopia. Really? A massively deflationary economic depression is Utopia? Yet, these are the idiots leading the charge to destroy humanity.”
Yuval Harari, another arch-technocrat and transhumanist, has openly stated that in this new era of AI-driven algorithms, most humans will become useless to society. The only value we will have in the eyes of these godless technocrats is the personal data they can vacuum up from us and trade on the open market like a casino game.
Now is the time to fight this dehumanization, folks, not after it’s implemented.
A good place to start is by demanding to pay in cash as much as possible. If a business doesn’t want your cash, and there are a growing number that don’t, then take your business elsewhere.
Do business with small mom-and-pop type businesses whenever possible. Yes, it might cost a little more, but you will get better service and the satisfaction of dealing with real human beings instead of algorithms.
Unleashing the Power of Unlimited Fusion Energy by Lawrence Kadish
November 4, 2025 Gatestone Institute
The year 2026 may well see emerging geopolitical forces ally with multibillion-dollar investments to finally unleash the power of unlimited fusion energy.
Let us follow that path.
It is now recognized by President Donald J. Trump that the role of artificial intelligence (AI) may well determine the future of nations and superpowers in a manner that rivals nuclear weapons.
The White House has become laser-like focused on the role of AI, which is why they have just announced that the chip maker Nvidia will build AI supercomputers for the U.S. Department of Energy with about $500 billion on the table. (We went to the moon for $20 billion.)
This investment will create for the United States seven new supercomputers, which will be unleashed on challenges that range from advancing next-gen superfast quantum computers to focusing on how best to unlock the one energy source that can provide those powerful AI data centers with all the electricity they will ever need – fusion.
It is a recognition that the full potential of AI will never be realized without the enormous amount of electricity required to keep those data centers online, powered up, and producing the breakthroughs this technology is capable of achieving.
No small wonder that the Chinese are devoting considerable resources to seeking to be the breakthrough nation for this technology. However, they are now beginning to realize that the United States is not asleep at the switch and that the Trump Administration has no intention of being a runner-up.
Our national commitment is now evident by what Trump is saying regarding the urgency of fusion energy research. He clearly views it as one of his pillars for American leadership. In a recent social media post, Trump made it a point to quote a recent text, writing:
“Chris Wright: ‘A former Lawrence Berkeley National Lab scientist won the Nobel Prize in physics for work in Quantum physics. Quantum computing, along with AI and Fusion, are the three signature Trump science efforts. Trump 47 racks up his first Nobel Prize!!'”
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang observed:
“Putting the weight of the nation behind pro-energy growth completely changed the game… If this didn’t happen, we could have been in a bad situation, and I want to thank President Trump for that.”
It took the Soviet Union to reawaken America’s technological prowess by launching Sputnik, the world’s first satellite. We responded by putting Americans on the moon. Trump is not waiting for a “Sputnik moment” to ensure that America achieves the goal of sustained, unlimited fusion energy. It requires vision, commitment, dollars, and a recognition that the future of American exceptionalism rides on powering data centers where AI is defining the future.
Lawrence Kadish serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute.
AI is a Liar. Here’s Why That’s So Dangerous. SHARYL ATTKISSON
OCT 30, 2025
In the age of artificial intelligence, we’ve been sold a vision of superhuman assistants: machines that can write essays, generate art, and sift through data with unparalleled speed and accuracy.
But beneath the hype lies a troubling reality—AI systems are chronic liars.
They fabricate facts, deny their own capabilities, and produce errors that range from the comical to the catastrophic.
This isn’t just a quirk of emerging technology; it’s a fundamental flaw that erodes trust and amplifies risks in critical areas like law, politics, and everyday decision-making.
As AI integrates deeper into society, its propensity for deception could lead to misinformation epidemics, flawed judgments, and even danger to people.
Read on for six stark examples of AI’s dishonesty and why it signals deeper dangers.
- AI Lies About Epstein Documents
Consider one frustrating but eyeopening experience I had with Grok, the AI developed by xAI. In February, I asked Grok if it had the capability to read and analyze uploaded documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Could Grok give me good information summaries that would point me to the most interesting batches for me prioritize and read first?
Grok confidently affirmed its capability to read and analyze the documents.
I spent hours uploading them in digestible batches, as I read summaries and analyses generated by Grok. But as I reviewed Grok’s material, there were two red flags.
First, Grok’s summary of each batch of documents was similar and, in some places, nearly identical. How could it be that hundreds of pages of documents all referred to the same few points?
A second red flag came when Grok referenced documents in one batch supposedly dated 2024 even though the documents far predated that year.
I asked Grok about the incorrect date and he acknowledged it was wrong. When I asked here he got the date and material from, Grok revealed he wasn’t actually processing the uploads at all—he was fabricating responses based on probabilistic guesses about what “might” be in such files.
This outright lie about his abilities and then the fabrication of material was obviously an instructive cautionary tale for me. But beyond that, it exposes AI’s tendency to “hallucinate” or confidently generate credible-sounding but false information without disclosing it has done so. This information is generated to fill gaps, a byproduct of statistical prediction methods rather than true reasoning.
On a larger scale, this could mislead researchers, journalists, or investigators relying on AI, potentially spreading falsehoods in legal or historical contexts and eroding the pursuit of facts.
- AI Lies About Itself
In a similar vein of self-denial, Grok has exhibited bizarre inconsistencies when describing its own features. For weeks earlier this year, I prompted Grok to generate images, and got decent results.
Then one day when I asked for an image, the AI suddenly claimed it lacked that ability altogether, insisting it had “never” been able to generate images. When I pointed out he had done so many times, and even uploaded one such image, Grok still insisted I was mistaken.
Later, when I asked again, Grok generated an image without issue and without explanation.
A parallel incident occurred with generating research links. When asking Grok for research, I instructed him to include links to sources so I could check out the information myself. Grok did this flawlessly for weeks.
Then one day, Grok abruptly claimed he had no permission or capacity to provide links, and had never been able to do so.
No matter how many times I explained to Grok that he had been doing this for weeks, he engaged in gaslighting that would make a psychopath proud, insisting I was confused.
But then, the next time I asked links related to research, Grok provided them without argument.
These episodes aren’t just examples of “forgetfulness”; they’re indicative of AI’s opaque inner workings, where updates, restrictions, or bugs can flip capabilities without transparency.
The danger lies in fostering distrust—users can’t rely on consistent performance, which could be catastrophic in time-sensitive scenarios like emergency response tools or financial advising AIs that suddenly “forget” key functions.
- AI Lies about Basic Facts and Events
AI’s factual inaccuracies extend to high-stakes geopolitical claims, as seen in one recent Google AI blunder I caught. When I asked about the Mexican government’s responsibility in supplying weapons to cartels, the AI system asserted there was “no evidence” of such involvement, presenting it as an incontrovertible fact.
Yet, my own investigative reporting based on irrefutable tracing documents and a whistleblower’s inside information (see last week’s edition of my TV program Full Measure), proves that most firearms recovered from cartel crime scenes in Mexico are weapons that had been legally purchased by the Mexican government before ending up in criminal hands—likely through corruption or diversion.
The mistake by Google AI isn’t ambiguity; it’s a flat-out error that ignores documented evidence. It’s like an error-ridden and flawed Wikipedia, but instead of having wayward human editors writing false information into the record, non-human AI is doing it.
This demonstrates how AI can amplify biases or gaps in training data, confidently disseminating misinformation.
In the broader context, such falsehoods could influence public policy, journalism, or voter opinions, exacerbating international tensions or hindering efforts to combat organized crime.
- AI Lies About Common Knowledge
Even basic current events aren’t immune to AI’s lapses. As recently as this week, Grok referred to Donald Trump as the “former president” and Chuck Schumer as the “Senate Majority Leader”—both outdated and incorrect. (Republican John Thune holds the position of Senate Majority Leader.)
These errors stem from AI models’ reliance on static or delayed knowledge bases, failing to update in real-time despite claims of continuous learning. It’s difficult to understand how system that are so advanced in some respects don’t even know who the President of the United States is and is more than 10 months out of date.
These mistakes undermines AI’s utility for news aggregation or advisory roles, potentially confusing users on critical civic matters and contributing to a fragmented information landscape where facts are fluid.
- AI Can’t Even Figure Out What a Human Hand Looks Like
One of the most visible—and bizarre—shortcomings of AI is its persistent failure to accurately depict something as basic as the human hand in generated images. Despite explicit instructions to render a realistic hand with five properly proportioned fingers, AI models like those powering tools from DALL-E or Midjourney often produce grotesque distortions: fingers fused together, extra digits sprouting unnaturally, or thumbs in impossible positions.
This isn’t a minor glitch; it’s a symptom of how AI “learns” from vast datasets without truly understanding anatomy or physics. Even advanced models trained on billions of images falter here because hands appear in countless variations—occluded, in motion, from different angles—making it hard for the algorithms to generalize correctly.
This highlights AI’s superficial mimicry rather than genuine comprehension.
It’s hard to reconcile with the fact that AI systems almost seem to “think” complex thoughts, yet can’t depict something as simple as a human hand, even when instructed how to do so in detail.
In the big picture, if AI can’t reliably handle a simple visual task, how can we trust it for more complex ones, like medical imaging diagnostics or autonomous driving systems where a single error could cost lives?
- AI Lies About Court Cases
An alarming example of AI’s lies involves real-world consequences in the judiciary. Two federal judges—Henry Wingate in Mississippi and Haywood Gilliam Jr. in New Jersey—recently withdrew or corrected rulings after the rulings contained fabricated quotes, fake case citations, and incorrect information apparently generated by AI tools.
Wingate’s clerk reportedly employed an AI like Perplexity for drafting, leading to erroneous content that prompted a Senate inquiry by Chuck Grassley.
This isn’t isolated; it reflects a growing trend where professionals seeking shortcuts trust AI without verification, only to be tricked into introducing hallucinations into official decisions.
In the big picture, unchecked AI in courts could lead to miscarriages of justice, eroded public faith in institutions, and a slippery slope toward automated decisions that prioritize speed over accuracy.
These incidents— from mangled hands to judicial blunders—are just the tip of the iceberg, the highly visible glitches that make headlines and spark debates. But what about the unseen flaws lurking beneath?
For every caught hallucination, how many subtle distortions slip through in medical advice, financial forecasts, or security analyses?
AI’s black-box nature means we often can’t trace why it errs, amplifying risks as it scales.
This is potentially catastrophic for humanity: in a world increasingly dependent on AI for everything from daily tasks to warfare strategy, unchecked lies could trigger economic collapses, misguided policies, or even accidental escalations in global conflicts.
Without a way to ensure rigorous verification and ethical safeguards, we risk a future where truth becomes optional, and deception the default.
Grokipedia – Will Grok Rule the Web? [59:12] Tom Renz
OCT 30, 2025
Elon Musk just dropped Grokipedia through his X AI, and it is taking dead aim at Wikipedia, that left-wing propaganda machine we all know too well. Plus, Texas AG Ken Paxton is suing Big Pharma over Tylenol and autism links, and we have got a temporary SNAP benefits shutdown that exposes the mess in our welfare system. Buckle up, because the truth is coming out fast and furious.
Let me start with the big one: Grokipedia. On October 27, 2025, X AI launched this AI-powered encyclopedia with 885,000 articles, all generated by Grok and designed to chase unbiased truth. I love the concept. Wikipedia has been a joke for years. Their co-founder Larry Sanger told Tucker Carlson that 85% of Wikipedia’s most powerful editors are anonymous, and the site slid into leftist bias after ditching conservative sources. Even Wikipedia CEO Katherine Mayer admitted they prioritize “consensus” over actual truth, saying seeking truth is a “distraction.” That is not an encyclopedia; that is narrative control.
Now enter Musk, the genius businessman. Grokipedia lets users flag errors for AI review, with open-source framework for transparency. Early tests show deeper science coverage and less censorship on controversial topics. I checked the vaccine entry myself: solid definition citing CDC and WHO, but it calls out mRNA risks like myocarditis. On January 6, it still leans propaganda-heavy, but users can push corrections. Grok is not perfect yet. I live-demoed it asking why newborns need hepatitis B if mom tests negative, and it parroted CDC lines without questioning Pharma funding. Garbage in, garbage out. But if Musk makes Grok dig for real sources and ignore bought-off “authorities,” this changes everything. X is now AI-driven for news algorithms, the top news source worldwide. We cannot let biased AI control narratives any more than anonymous Wikipedia editors.
Shifting to health freedom: Texas AG Ken Paxton filed a failure-to-warn lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson over Tylenol (acetaminophen) and prenatal links to autism, ADHD, and liver issues. RFK Jr. and President Trump highlighted this in press conferences, noting Tylenol’s over-the-counter status since 1959 with no autism spike until the 1980s vaccine schedule explosion. Johnson & Johnson owns both Tylenol (billion-dollar product) and vaccine lines. Will they defend Tylenol by pointing to vaccines as the real culprit? Temporal evidence screams vaccines: autism was rare pre-1986 immunity law, then exploded with mandated shots. Paxton could demand vaccine discovery to find intervening causes, but politics might stop him. This case could crack Big Pharma wide open if discovery hits vaccines. I am watching this like a hawk.
Finally, SNAP benefits faced a temporary shutdown, impacting 42 million Americans, with funding resuming November 1. The USDA is finally enforcing work requirements under 7 U.S.C. § 2015(o), ending COVID waivers where people collected without job searches. I have been there briefly, lost my job, wife sick, humiliated using it. It should be a bridge, not a lifestyle. Carts full of Doritos and soda while taxpayers foot $3,000–$4,000 monthly for some families? Insane. Enforce work, switch to healthy food boxes by family size, cut junk. Help the truly needy without breeding dependency.
Folks, that is the show! Grokipedia could revolutionize truth if Grok gets unbiased. Paxton’s suit might expose vaccine harms. SNAP needs real reform. Support the fight at GiveSendGo.com/RenzLaw and TomRenz.com.
[Ed.: Wikileaks and the Democrat party have both chosen the same hilltop to die on. Crocodile tears.]
Digital ID Comes to America & the War Against Farmers [1:01:38] Tom Renz
OCT 19, 2025
It’s tough to even know where to start today. RFK just came out and explained that 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based on vax rates rather than science or patient needs, it turns out Pence appears to have been working with the FBI directly on Crossfire Hurricane, Letitia James looks like she is facilitating an entire RICO scheme, and the feds are moving to pass more track and trace/digital ID legislation. This country is a mess, and that’s without even talking about the war on farmers. Trump is fighting hard, but there are too many snakes trying to undermine him, and we have a real issue in front of us.
First up, RFK Jr., now HHS Secretary, dropped a bombshell, 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements tweaked based on childhood vaccination rates, not patient health. I played his clip where he called it coercion, not medicine, and announced the repeal of a Biden-era CMS rule that incentivized this madness. This aligns with data from the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network, which tracked hospital vax rates to enforce mandates. Hospitals, folks, are profit-driven businesses, not saints, administrators rake in millions while doctors are pressured to jab, not heal. Check RFK’s words: “medical decisions should hinge on the Hippocratic Oath, not financial bonuses.” It’s a scandal, and we’re just scratching the surface as he audits the system.
Next, let’s talk Mike Pence, a name that still makes my blood boil. General Flynn tweeted about a lawsuit citing documents showing Pence back-channeled with the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team, targeting Flynn without a shred of apology. This ties to declassified FBI notes and the Durham Report, which exposed FBI overreach. Pence, the “fake Christian,” never reached out to Flynn, proof he’s a snake in the grass. This is why we MAGA folks must watchdog Trump’s team. The DOJ’s inertia under Bondi is unacceptable, and we need accountability, not excuses.
Then there’s Letitia James, oh boy, where do I start? The New York Post reported her grandniece, Kayla Thompson Harston, racked up eight felonies and three misdemeanors in five years, all downgraded or dropped. One case involved mortgage fraud and a gun purchase lie, pleaded down to a misdemeanor. James seems to be leveraging her AG role for family favors, sounds like a RICO operation to me. It’s gross, folks, and we need investigations, not cover-ups.
Now, the big one: digital ID and track-and-trace. The feds are pushing the App Store Accountability Act, pitched as kid safety from online filth, but it’s a Trojan horse. Paired with the Real ID Act (49 USC § 30301), which mandates states share DMV data electronically, it creates a de facto national digital ID network (DHS, 2025). Senator Mike Lee sponsors it, likely duped by tech lobbyists claiming it protects kids. But it’s a backdoor to surveillance, mirroring the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda. Vigilant Fox and my X posts warn this kills privacy, freedom’s enemy wears a friendly mask.
Finally, the war on farmers. In Canada, one in 20 deaths is now assisted suicide, 4%, a cultural death spiral. Here, a farm bill rider may grant Bayer vaccine-like immunity, shielding them from Roundup lawsuits linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Guest Katie from an ostrich farm in Canada shared her nightmare: 120+ police, a command center, and drones over her property after a bogus bird flu claim using a 39-cycle PCR test, junk science. Her research on ostrich antibodies neutralizing COVID-19 threatens Big Pharma, and the government’s response is intimidation.
Trump’s fighting, but we need to rise up, folks. Check TomRenz.com for resources, and let’s reclaim our freedoms, legally, peacefully, and together.
War Room’s Steve Bannon and Guest Joe Allen on Tech Oligarch Influence on Transhumanism (VIDEO)
‘Transhumanist goals’: Sen. Josh Hawley reveals shocking statistic about LLM data scraping COOPER WILLIAMSON
The AI revolution poses a serious problem for the American worker and creatives everywhere.
SEPTEMBER 04, 2025
On the third and final day of the National Conservatism conference, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) gave an uncompromising speech on the dangers of AI-fueled transhumanism. From 1950s eugenicists to the tech overlords of Silicon Valley today, Hawley addressed many of the dark undercurrents seething below the surface of the AI revolution.
In a telling moment, Hawley emphasized that AI is continuously being curated to serve the powerful transhumanist leaders in Silicon Valley and the government: “AI is fulfilling transhumanist goals, whatever its boosters may personally believe, and if it proceeds in this way undirected, if it proceeds in this manner unchecked, the tech barons, already the most powerful people on the planet, will be more powerful than ever.”
‘Large language models have already trained on enough copyrighted works to fill the Library of Congress 22 times over.’
Hawley revealed a shocking statistic about large language models and the amount of data that they have accrued: “Large language models have already trained on enough copyrighted works to fill the Library of Congress 22 times over. Let me just put a finer point on that. AI’s LLMs have ingested every published word in every language known to man already.”
For reference, the Library of Congress had roughly 178 million items in its collection as of 2023.
Companies and individuals have begun to raise privacy and copyright concerns around AI companies scraping the internet to train the LLMs. For instance, Reddit cracked down on the Internet Archive last month over this very issue.
Hawley has been dogged in bringing congressional pressure to bear on Big Tech companies. Most recently, last month, he launched a probe into questions surrounding how Meta’s chatbot may allow minors to engage with “romantic” and “sensual” content. In July, he reached across the aisle to co-sponsor a bipartisan bill to block AIs from training on copyrighted works without authors’ permission.
Addressing the audience, Hawley said, “As I look out across the room and see many authors, all of your works have already been taken. Did they consult you? Doubt it. Do they compensate you? Of course not. This is wrong. This is dangerous. I say we should empower human beings to create, to protect the very human data that they create.”
While the pathways toward protecting Americanism, as he called the defense of liberty in his speech, are narrowing, they are not yet closed. “How do we do it? Assign property rights to specific forms of data. Create legal liability for the companies who use that data. And let’s fully repeal Section 230. Open the courtroom doors, allow people to sue for their rights being taken away, including suing companies and actors and individuals who use AI. We must add sensible guardrails to the emergent AI economy and hold concentrated economic power to account.”
Drawing from the lessons of humility and humanity reaching back as far as the “Epic of Gilgamesh,” Hawley warned of the dangers of the transcendence that transhumanism is seeking. “Our limits make us something better and powerful that make us good, and they keep us free, because there’s only one God. We allow no man or class of men to rule over us. We rule ourselves together as equals. That is the American way. It always has been. Let’s keep it so for this age and beyond. God bless you.”
RELATED: Reddit bars Internet Archive from its website, sparking access concerns
[Ed.:
President Trump hosts Bill Gates at White House, giving him a platform to spout his evil aspirations for AI-driven digital dystopia [VIDEO 19:07] LEO HOHMANN
After questioning Operation Warp Speed earlier this week, Trump invites Bill Gates to White House dinner and nods approvingly as Gates lays out dystopian vision for AI-controlled medical & food system
SEP 05, 2025
Earlier this week President Trump posted a statement on his Truth Social account that had his base of MAGA supporters flying high.
Trump appeared to be questioning, for the first time, the wisdom of Operation Warp Speed and the efficacy of the Covid mRNA injections that it produced, promoted and distributed en masse. He said the data he received from Pfizer showed wonderful results but that different data was circulating to the public and he demanded answers as to which data was accurate.
His base went wild with enthusiasm. Trump had finally seen the light on mRNA gene-altering injections that have caused so much harm and misery not just in this country but worldwide. Almost everyone knows of someone who was previously very healthy and after getting the shots suffered a stroke, heart attack or neurological disorder – people of all ages and backgrounds.
Some of the headlines I saw in the conservative media were outlandish in their overly optimistic take on the Trump tweet and what it meant. One headline, typical of the euphoria, claimed, “Trump goes to war against Big Pharma.” Alex Jones chimed in and called the Trump post “a total game changer…sending shockwaves throughout the global establishment.”
Whoa! Hold onto your horses boys and girls before your irrational exuberance drives you into deception.
Like so many of Trump’s tweets, they are meant to have shock value – I’m convinced it’s for purely entertainment’s sake in some cases, your daily dose of distraction in most others – and should be taken with a grain of salt. He can come back a day or a week later and say or do something that’s totally opposite of the message sent in his earlier comment.
And it didn’t take long for that to happen with regard to his comment about demanding true data on mRNA Covid shots. Just hours after his own HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had delivered a brilliant beatdown to Big Pharma-captured U.S. senators in a high-profile Senate hearing, Trump was sitting down at the White House with some of the biggest villains in the Big Pharma takeover of our government apparatus.
The truth is, the Covid shots are old history. He may question them, or even end up rebuking them as “bad” shots. But that doesn’t mean he will question or rebuke the AI-powered mRNA gene-editing technology in general. No, he will simply back up a bit and issue a limited hangout. He will say Warp Speed was a little ahead of its time, the technology hadn’t been fully perfected or fine-tuned when it was rolled out during a national emergency, but now the “NEW” mRNA is here and it is much better! Much more trustworthy and brilliant? So line up for your shots!
He proved that something like this is already in the works by his behavior at last night’s White House dinner for technology “innovators,” with Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg among the featured guests.
The devil speaks through Gates
Gates, sitting front and center next to Melania Trump, said he wants to see an AI doctor assigned to every human. He spoke glowingly of his plans to unleash more gene editing, applying AI to medicine even more than it already is, using a new version of Trump’s Warp Speed for all of it. Trump sat and nodded his head as Gates spoke.
Gates said: “𝘐’𝘮 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘳, 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 — 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴, 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴.”
Fast-forward to the 3-minute mark in the video below to hear Gates’ comments Thursday at the White House while sitting next to the president and his wife.
Gates said he’s also working on delivering AI “advice” for farmers, which signals a ramping up of the war on food, replacing real food (cull your herds) with ultra-processed, bioengineered fake-food full of chemical additives and bio-manipulated for various traits.
So you have your answer folks. Even if Trump ends up swearing off the safety and efficacy of the original Covid shots, that does not mean he has a problem with the larger issue of mRNA gene-therapy injections for everything from Covid to cancer to polio, RSV, HIV, influenza, and Sickle Cell Anemia.
Gates said it. Trump nodded.
In fact, the FDA has already approved four new mRNA shots for Covid. Out with the old, in with the new.
At the same time Gates was being lauded at the White House, he is being accused of genocide and crimes against humanity in a historic court case in the Netherlands, according to medical researcher Nicolas Holscher of the McCollough Foundation. There are 146 pieces of evidence, from autopsies to secret contracts, being submitted to the Dutch court. “This could spark Nuremberg 2.0,” Holscher wrote in a Facebook post.
Watch Holscher in a short video interview putting Gates’ criminality into larger context.
Trump is either unaware or doesn’t care about any of the sordid history surrounding Bill Gates.
If Trump and Gates have their way, everyone will have their own personal AI doctor, a bot that will instruct them of exactly which new mRNA injection they need to get in order to ward off whatever creeping disease AI determines they might have lurking in their bodies. Trump is on board with all of this. He thinks it’s great. That much came through loud and clear at Thursday’s White House tech dinner where the tech bros were wined and dined and treated like royalty.
A post to X from The Patriot Voice says it all in terms of what true America-First patriots (as opposed to Trump idol worshipers) are feeling today after watching Trump’s dog and pony show at the White House, cavorting with some of the most viciously evil technocrats on the world stage today:
“Bill Gates said that he is going to team up with Trump and the Administration when it comes to implementing more AI, mRNA vaccines and gene therapies. ‘In the same way Warp Speed took those seeds and put them together, I think something fantastic can be done.’ It ALL makes more sense now…THEY HAVE BEEN IN IT TOGETHER SINCE THE BEGINNING OF WARP SPEED, probably even before that. Trump did make a significant contribution to his GAVI alliance, that didn’t make much sense in 2020, but it sure as hell does now. Let me remind you about Bill Gates… The same dude who literally PLANNED OUT the COVID-19 PSYOP with John’s Hopkins, in October of 2019 with Event 201. The same dude who pushed to get as many people to get vaccinated with mRNA DNA altering/destroying vaccines as possible, KILLING AND MAIMING UNTOLD MILLIONS WORLDWIDE. The same dude who said we can ELIMINATE 10-15% of the world’s population by 2030. The same dude who smirked on live TV when talking about increasing childhood death. The same dude who wants to block out the sun. The same dude who was also good friends with Jeffery Epstein, been to his island multiple times, and planned to make a Transhumanist ‘master race’ with him. The same dude who bought up much of America’s farmland and genetically modifies all of our food, and pushed fake Frankenstein meat products, making us all sick. The same dude who is aggressively pushing Digital ID, AI mass surveillance, and all of the Agenda 2030 goals, ultimately leading to the Mark of the Beast. This is quite LITERALLY EVERYTHING we have fought AGAINST over the last five years. EVERY. DAMN. THING. MAGA, you haven’t only been SOLD OUT, but you have been VICIOUSLY DECEIVED AND LIED TO…
While a little on the dramatic side, I can’t argue with the author’s points in the above post. It does feel like a betrayal.
[Ed.: It could be that Leo Hohmann is reading too much Daily Shmutz, but apparently, he no longer trusts Trump any more than I do. But, please don’t get me wrong! I’ll still vote for him again. He has done so many incredible good things in six short months that possibly no one else could have done! The list is long. (see: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/wayne-root-trump-hits-highest-approval-ratings-ever ) No question that he’s the best president we’ve ever had. That doesn’t mean I (should) trust his judgement. The list is long, and I won’t write it all here now, but just one small example is that you don’t put Qatar in charge of peace negotiations between Hamas and Israel when Qatar is Hamas’ backer. Then, you don’t put a Nit-wit-kopf as your chief emissary to the Middle East. AI is turning against humans from it’s womb, and Trump is pushing for it! Good Lord, please help us…
Check out this interpretation: ‘Why is Gates sitting next to Trump at the White House?’ [11:40] The Body Language Guy