COMMENTARY / OPINION
Mamdani Unvarnished: Watch What He Said About Israel Before He Ran For Mayor by Steven Emerson
November 2, 2025 IPT News
On May 11, 2021, Zohran Mamdani participated in a virulently antisemitic 2-hour anti-Israel demonstration in NYC. Besides Mamdani, the rally featured some of the most notorious anti-Israel activists in the United States. Mamdani himself called for the effective destruction of the State of Israel in language that we feel every voter in NYC is entitled to hear, contrary to the false impression of moderation that Mamdani has tried to cultivate in this year’s election. As you watch this excerpt, think about whether you are comfortable with Mamdani as he spits out his real agenda.
WATCH [3:51]
Transcript:
But more important than that I’m someone who I co-founded my college’s first Students for Justice in Palestine. The struggle for Palestine is the struggle for dignity. And every single one of us is committed to dignity in Greenpoint has to be committed to dignity in Gaza. Every single one of us who wants justice in Whitestone needs to be fighting for justice in the West Bank.
You might ask yourself what can you do in New York City to make sure that our brothers, our sisters, our families beyond the binary in Palestine are safe, and free, and receive justice. You can put pressure on every single one of your elected officials, at the city council, at the state assembly, at the state senate, we have elected officials who are taking paid for trips to Israel. They are going there paid for by your tax dollars. They show up at the Israel Day parade and they say stand in solidarity.
We want to let them know that there are three letters that we have as an answer to what’s happening in Palestine. It’s BDS (leads chants of “BDS”).
That’s what we’re fighting for. We saw it before with South Africa, we’ll see it again with Palestine. You cannot expect injustice to stop without international pressure on that very injustice.
3.8. billion dollars every year is sent from the United States to Israel. 3.8 billion dollars, while our family here are homeless, while our family here do not have money for schools, we are sending money to weaponize the IDF even more than they already are.
So let us say that from this day forward we will stand in solidarity with Palestinians and we will hold every single person who has power this city, in this state, in this country, accountable for their incomprehensible fealty to the Israeli state.
Some of you may know I’m a proud socialist and I’m a proud member of the New York City DSA. And what brought me to that organization is the endorsement by that organization of BDS, is the belief that there is no distinction between the fight here and the fight there, because I grew up in this country when we had a phrase, “Progressive Except Palestine.” And we cannot allow that phrase to flourish for any longer.
If you’re committed to justice show me your stance on Palestine. If you say you’re a socialist show me your stance on apartheid. That is what we’re asking for from now on. We’re not asking for it, we are demanding it.
So, I stand in solidarity with my Palestinian family, I will stand in solidarity with them until the occupation is over, until apartheid is over, and until we have no distinction of dignity within Palestine, within Israel, within any part of this very world. Thank you very, very much. Once again, the answer: BDS. (Leads chants of “BDS”).
Related Topics: Steven Emerson, Zohran Mamdani, New York City, Mayor, Islamist, BDS, Boycott Divest Sanctions, Democratic Socialists of America, DSA, Israel, Gaza, Palestine
Alois Brunner: The Nazi Butcher of Thessaloniki’s Jews By Philip Chrysopoulos
November 1, 2025 Greek Reporter
Alois Brunner, one of the most ruthless figures of the Holocaust and a key collaborator of Adolf Eichmann, was directly responsible for the systematic deportation and murder of tens of thousands of Jews across Europe, with his actions in Thessaloniki, Greece, representing one of the most tragic episodes.
Brunner during his tenure as an SS officer.Oublic Domain
Brunner wiped out a centuries-old community in Thessaloniki
Brunner, known as Eichmann’s “right-hand man,” was dispatched to the Balkans in early 1943 specifically to organize the destruction of the large, centuries-old Jewish community of Thessaloniki.
Within a period of just two months, Brunner oversaw the systematic deportation of approximately 43,000 to 46,000 Greek Jews from the city.
The victims were crammed into sealed freight wagons for a harrowing nine-day journey to the Auschwitz-Birkenau extermination camp in occupied Poland, where nearly all were murdered upon arrival.
Brunner’s efficiency and dedication to the Nazi agenda effectively wiped out the entirety of Greece’s largest Jewish community.
A career of atrocities
Brunner’s direct role in the Final Solution extended far beyond Greece. Conservative estimates suggest he was accountable for the deaths of at least 128,500 people in total. His other major assignments included:
- Organizing the deportation of 47,000 Austrian Jews.
- Commanding the notorious Drancy internment camp near Paris, overseeing the transport of thousands of French Jews, including hundreds of children, to the gas chambers
After the war, in the 1950s, he escaped to Syria, where he allegedly became an advisor to President Hafez al-Assad, father of Bashar al-Assad. He managed to escape two assassination attempts by members of the Israeli intelligence.
He was repeatedly convicted and sentenced to death in absentia in France during the 1950s.
The exact timing of Brunner’s death remains a source of conflicting reports. While some intelligence suggests he died in 2010, later investigations indicate his death may have occurred earlier, possibly in December 2001, allegedly while confined to a miserable basement in Damascus.
He was never brought to justice in person.
Related: Diane von Fürstenberg Honored in Thessaloniki, The Birthplace of Her Holocaust Survivor Mother
Michael Goodwin: A Zohran Mamdani mayoralty would mean a long, sour decline for NYC By Michael Goodwin
Nov. 1, 2025 New York Post
As a young reporter at The New York Times, I had the good fortune of working with an experienced political editor named Sheldon Binn.
A wounded veteran of World War II, he explained the simple yardstick he used to judge politicians.
“The only thing I ask is that they don’t make things worse,” I recall him saying.
“That’s the best you can hope for.”
As a wide-eyed idealist, I found his standard shockingly low and cynical.
But these days, Binn’s rule makes more sense to me than ever.
MORE FROM MICHAEL GOODWIN
Michael Goodwin: Andrew Cuomo has my vote for NYC mayor – the Big Apple cannot afford a Mamdani mistake
Michael Goodwin: Zohran Mamdani will finally have to answer for his sickening antisemitism at NYC mayoral debate
Michael Goodwin: Trump bringing peace to the Middle East is the real prize
Exhibit A is the New York mayoral race, where the Democrats’ nominee, Zohran Mamdani, is pushing a sweepingly radical agenda.
If voters are foolish enough to elect him Tuesday, his tenure wouldn’t just make things slightly worse.
His policies would inflict major damage in myriad ways, from declining public safety to out-of-control spending.
Schools would be further dumbed down and his pledge to hike taxes would drive away businesses, families and jobs.
His antisemitic attacks on Israel make him unfit to lead the Jewish capital of America.
Mamdani also vows to close Rikers Island, with no place to put the 7,000 inmates.
The result would be a rapid decline in the quality of life for the city’s remaining residents, workers and visitors.
And not just for a short time.
Gotham’s history is chock full of lessons on how the actions of a mayor, good or bad, can have an outsized impact for years and even decades beyond his tenure.
In addition to actual policies, a mayor helps shape the broader civic culture, including the role of nonprofits and private philanthropy.
In Mamdani’s case, a long, sour decline is guaranteed because his promise of free this and free that, combined with an expansion of government control over private housing and some supermarkets, would require punishingly higher taxes.
Former NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio attends the COVID-19 Five Year Remembrance event.
Paul Martinka
His agenda is a carbon copy of failed socialist governments around the world and throughout history.
Cuba and Venezuela are two clear and close examples: Huge portions of their populations have fled to other countries, and they didn’t run to nearby socialist outposts.
They voted with their feet by aiming for New York and other cities in America.
If socialism is good and capitalism is evil, why is it that nobody, including Trump-hating celebrities, quits America to live in Cuba or Venezuela?
That dynamic gets to the heart of why I am voting for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and why it is essential that Mamdani and his snake oil never sets foot in City Hall.
Cuomo is far from perfect, but under the Binn test, the fact that he would do less harm makes him the right choice.
The damage the untested 34-year-old Mamdani would do would not be easily corrected, even if he were booted after a single term.
Tap Here To Add New York Post As A Trusted Source
Failed experiment
Four years is enough time to dig New York into a hole that it might not escape for years.
History shows the pattern.
Consider the relevance of events 50 years ago this week, when a famous headline summed up Gotham’s fiscal nightmare.
“Ford to City, Drop Dead,” shouted the Daily News after President Ford vowed to veto any federal effort to bail out the city from its financial mess.
For years, New York had lived well beyond its means.
So much so that banks took the drastic step of cutting off their lines of credit.
The mountain of debts wasn’t built overnight.
The eight-year tenure of Republican Mayor John Lindsay that started in 1966 featured a nonstop spend-a-thon and a breakdown of law-and-order.
The number of murders exploded, with the total in his final year three times higher than in his first year.
The city comptroller at the time, Democrat Abe Beame, never blew the whistle on the chaos, but the Dem machine still got him elected mayor in ’73.
His move to City Hall sped up deficit spending, and it was fitting that the banks stopped the grift on his watch.
It is also understandable that Ford was reluctant to help unless the city started to clean up its own act.
Beame lost his bid for re-election in part because the budget cuts needed to balance the books fell heavily on the NYPD.
The city became a filthy crime capital and the quality of life went to hell.
Over a few years, nearly 1 million people fled, most to the suburbs or Florida.
Ed Koch was the next mayor up, and his bold plans to reduce spending while also shoring up public safety were just what the doctor ordered. Koch’s popularity soared, and as Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan told me several years later, Koch’s great triumph was that he showed New Yorkers, Washington and the banks that finally, “somebody is in charge.”
Although the city had a new bounce in its step, the problems didn’t melt away and crime continued to grow as the outgunned NYPD couldn’t keep up.
It wasn’t until 1990, when Koch’s beleaguered successor, David Dinkins, worked with Council Speaker Peter Vallone to develop a plan that called for hiring 10,000 more cops.
But with a slow roll-out, murders hit an all time high, with about 2,000 a year recorded during Dinkins’ term.
Golden Age of NYC
It was only after Rudy Giuliani became mayor in 1994 that the police force was fully funded and smartly used.
Giuliani and his team, including top cop Bill Bratton, used the new officers in targeted enforcement campaigns under the revolutionary “broken windows” theory of policing.
The results came fast and were dramatic.
Within four years, the number of murders fell by 60%, with huge declines in other crimes, too.
The pattern continued through Giuliani’s second term and all through Mike Bloomberg’s subsequent three terms as Bloomberg and his top cop, Ray Kelly, kept the same policies and extended and improved them.
The result was a 20-year Golden Age of public safety and economic expansion that transformed New York into the safest big city in America and the world capital of capital.
Jobs and population booms followed, with the city gaining even more people than it had lost.
As I wrote at the time, an elderly friend who had spent his entire life in New York said he had never seen it shine as it did at the end of Bloomberg’s tenure.
Unfortunately, he was followed by Bill de Blasio, the worst mayor since Beame.
Anti-cop to the core and a lazy, anti-business leftist, Mayor Putz left with crime on the rise and the quality of life in decline.
659
What do you think? Post a comment.
It is telling — and scary — that Mamdani calls him his favorite mayor.
As if to underscore the idiocy, he pledges to shrink the NYPD.
Reports that de Blasio is advising Mamdani and that there is overlap in their inner circles completes the horror scenario.
Polls showing Mamdani leading the race recall a definition of insanity: “Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.”
Don’t do it, New York.
Exposed! Tucker Associate Dinesh D’Souza Reveals The REAL Reason He Hates Israel! [28:01] Alex Traiman interviews Dinesh E’Souza
Sep 15, 2025 JNS TV
Is Israel’s war with Hamas part of a deeper spiritual battle foretold in the Bible?
JNS CEO and Jerusalem bureau chief Alex Traiman sits down with bestselling author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza to discuss his provocative new documentary “The Dragon’s Prophecy.” The film draws powerful parallels between the Oct. 7, 2023 war and ancient biblical conflicts, suggesting that Hamas’s tactics echo those of the Philistines and that the modern war on Israel may be a revival of age-old battles between good and evil.
D’Souza, known for films like “2016: Obama’s America” and “2000 Mules,” explains why this new project departs from his previous work and explores biblical archaeology, prophecy and the spiritual dimensions of Israel’s struggle. He and Traiman examine why radical Islam sees Israel not just as a military threat but as a moral and civilizational one: a liberal, Western outpost in the heart of the Middle East.
The conversation also confronts growing antisemitism in both left- and right-wing circles in the U.S., the ideological betrayal of Israel by figures like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and the disturbing rise in conspiracy theories that target Jews. D’Souza connects these trends to broader civilizational decline in the West and the abandonment of Judeo-Christian values, arguing that Jews and Christians must recognize the spiritual war they are both fighting.
They also reflect on the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk and the urgent need to restore sanity, morality and historical truth to public discourse.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Dinesh D’Souza and His Work
01:14 The Dragon’s Prophecy: A New Perspective on Israel
04:04 Hamas and the Philistines: Historical Parallels
05:58 The Alliance of Radical Islam and the Secular Left
09:00 Shifts in American Political Support for Israel
11:11 Understanding October 7th: A Historical Context
13:30 The Nature of Anti-Semitism and Criticism of Israel
15:40 The Role of Influencers in Shaping Opinions on Israel
18:50 Political Violence and Ideological Extremism
21:59 The Cultural War in America and Its Implications
24:31 The Spiritual Dimension of the Conflict
27:32 Conclusion and Call to Action
Trump Tried To Ignore Hamas, They’re Growing Stronger Every Day! [32:35] Yishai Fleisher
Nov 2, 2025
Will Hamas regroup in Gaza? What is the Mamdani NY election connection to Israel? Yishai interviews Dan Diker veteran political insider to unpack all of this and more…
Venezuela Is a Very Dangerous Enemy – Alex Newman [40:46] By Greg Hunter
November 1, 2025 USAWatchdog.com
Journalist Alex Newman, author of the popular book “Deep State” and the recent best-selling book called “Indoctrinating Our Children to Death,” is out with a new ominous warning about the military operation going on around Venezuela. This is way more than a counter-narcotics operation as the President of Venezuela is head of a government criminal cartel called “Cartel of the Sun.” Newman explains, “I grew up in Mexico and Latin America, and what is happening is we are watching the total communist takeover of the entire region. It has been aided and abetted by people like Joe Biden, Obama and George Soros. Let’s start with Venezuela. You cannot tell the difference between the cartels and the government. The Cartel of the Sun is run by the leaders of the military, intelligence agencies. Nicolaus Maduro, who got in by voter fraud, is the head of that cartel. This cartel is worth more money than anybody can fathom. It has diplomatic immunity and smuggles drugs using military and government airplanes. Oil is another big huge money maker. . .. This is not your run-of-the-mill corruption. . .. In Latin America, they are all part of the same thing. The cartels and government are essentially the same thing. You also see this in Mexico very clearly. You can’t tell where the government ends and cartels begin. The communist Chinese and the Russian government are critical players in this entire process. They have been from the beginning, and I have been covering this story for 15 years.”
So, when you see stories such as “Maduro Urgently Seeks Military Aid From Russia & China With US Bulls-Eye On Venezuela,” you should realize there is much more going on than meets the eye. Newman goes on to say, “This is so big, and you will not be able to piece it together by reading fake news in the fake media. . .. The Trump Administration knows this is much bigger than a counter-drug operation, but for whatever reason, they have chosen not to talk publicly about this. The drug cartels are a problem . . . but this is not about the drugs, it’s about the communist movement. The drugs are just a mechanism to bring in money. . .. What we are facing in Venezuela is a very dangerous enemy. They did this 50 years ago, and fast forward to today, they are doing it again. Once the revolution kicks off, they expect that the Russians, communist Chinese, North Koreans, Cubans and communists in Latin America will each occupy a piece of the United States as it is brought into the new system. They intend to establish a network of reeducation camps.”
What happens to the people that will not go along with the communist takeover? Newman says, “They will liquidate us, they intend to exterminate us, and that is tens of millions of Americans. Bill Ayres was the founder of the terrorist group The Weather Underground that wanted to overthrow the government of the United States. Barack Obama started his career in the living room of Bill Ayers. The real problem with the drug cartels is the profits are being used to build a totalitarian network that fully intends to enslave everybody in this hemisphere, and they intend to destroy the United States of America. Their assets are positioned all across this country. . .. The Venezuela tentacle is going to be a critical part. We are going to see the assets they have positioned all across our country unleashing hell on earth. I think this is why . . . the Trump Administration is so vigorously trying to track these guys down and get them out of the country. It’s absolutely essential that they do this.”
Newman also points out that the Venezuelan government is involved in voter fraud all over the world, including the 2020 US election. Yes, the Trump Administration knows this too.
There is much more in the 40-minute video.
There is an 8-minute video to explain how easy it is to ride out any terror attack or extreme storm. You can get more information on Starlink at Starlink123.com and Sat Phones at Sat123.com and BeReady123.com. You can also call 855-980-5830 and talk to a real human. Same goes for EscapeZone.com. where you can get Faraday bags big and small. You can also talk to a real human at EscapeZone.com by calling 702-825-0005.
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with hard-hitting journalist Alex Newman, founder of LibertySentinel.org and author of the upcoming book “Woke and Weaponized.” This is a stark warning for all parents about the communist agenda in our schools for 11.1.25.
WATCH [40:46]
Divide and conquer Peggy Tierney
NOV 01, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
Rush Limbaugh’s little brother says Tucker, Candace and Fuentes are wrong and should just stop spewing ugly and sinister propaganda about Israel.
As you well know if you read my newsletters, Candace has gone off the deep end to hate on Israel and the Jewish people – and Tucker just hosted Fuentes to bash Israel as well.
Tucker and Fuentes both called Christians who stand with Israel “Christian Zionists” and said they despise them. Yes, they both said that.
So, Candace despises Israel and all Jews and Tucker & Fuentes went further to hate on any Christian who supports Israel. Here’s what Limbaugh had to say:
DAVID LIMBAUGH: “I would agree in principle that criticism of a country doesn’t by itself imply animus toward the people of that country or their ethnicity, but what we’re witnessing bespeaks of something more than that and if it didn’t many of us wouldn’t be concerned about it.
There is an obvious resentment toward Israel for the insane notion that they control the United States and I believe that resentment is inextricably tied to a suspicion of the Jewish people, including in America, over their alleged control over things and who knows whatever else.
So what I’m saying is that even viewed in their most favorable light, these people on the right like Tucker, Fuentes and Candace (forget the irredeemable left) who are palpably opposed to Israel and resentful of our ties to them and our alliance with them, are motivated by something more than just foreign policy concerns. That seems clear to me. I’m America first too, BTW.
I support Israel for geopolitical reasons, because they’re our natural democratic ally, because they are head and shoulders more moral and grounded than their surrounding nations and their cause is just, and, in my case, probably most of all because I think God commands it.
And you scoffers on the Christian right (I happen to be fervently on the Christian right) who dismiss my view as heretical dispensationalism, are wrong. We can debate dispensationalism some other time, but believing God’s promises to Israel are permanent and that the church has not replaced the discreet and specific Jewish people and Jewish nation does not necessarily make one a dispensationalist. So take shots at dispensational theology and eschatology if you want, but in this case it’s a straw man.
But one thing is clear — something ugly is going on on the right and it may be bigger than I wanted to believe. We must head it off at the pass.
If you are not otherwise disposed to believe something sinister is happening here, one thing should signal to you that there is indeed something quite ugly about this. Notice some of the outrageous positions some people are taking and then the unnatural hoops others are leaping through to defend indefensible and bizarre positions. For the sake of argument, forget Tucker for a moment, whose positions and interviews and platforming and the rest deeply bother me.
I’ve admired and liked Tucker for many good positions he’s taken, but this turn I don’t understand. I don’t have to call him evil to say I radically disagree with him, but I do radically disagree with him on some stuff. But his interview and elevation of Fuentes was over the top and monumentally troubling. Do you guys realize what a freak show this guy is?
So when I say forget Tucker for argument’s sake, what I mean is that we don’t have to point to him to prove that there’s an unhealthy sympathy for anti-semitism on the right. Forget him because we need look no further than Fuentes. BECAUSE NOW MANY OF THE SAME PEOPLE WHO WERE DEFENDING SOME OF TUCKER’S BIZARRE POSITIONS ARE NOW ALSO DEFENDING FUENTES. WHAT THE HOLY HELL? POINT, SET, MATCH. LIKE Megyn Kelly, I hate criticizing friends and people I’ve admired, but at some point people of principle and good will have no choice.
You don’t have to agree with me on my theological views toward Israel to side with me against anti-semitism. In fact I don’t expect you to. But I’d be ardently pro-Israel anyway — to the extent it’s even possible to separate this God-anointed nation from its roots. But seeing the latest round of defenses for these insane positions following the Fuentes interview I feel like I have to speak up — even beyond my usual statements of unequivocal support for Israel.
I don’t want an internecine war and I want to be disrespectful to people on our side and I don’t want to write Tucker off as an evil person, but I do think he’s way off the rails here and I hope a reasonable explanation for this regrettable turn emerges at some point.
But Fuentes? You’ve got to be kidding me? Candace Owens? Well, I won’t even go there.”
Candy from a baby TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS OCT 27
Did you know that David Horowitz called Candace the MONSTER he created before he died?
So, Limbaugh agrees with me about Candace too!
Let’s dive into this further. Where is all this coming from? Are Tucker, Fuentes & Candace being paid to hate on Israel and on Christians who stand with Israel? Is it theological or political?
I found this post on X and I totally agree with this theory. She said it better than I ever could:
“If you are a Christian who is buying into the Democrat and Koch Libertarian-funded narrative about how we should all hate Israel – and embrace Hamas – please stop. You are only dividing MAGA and playing into our enemies’ hands. Here’s why:
The attacks on Israel have nothing to do with Israel. It’s all about fracturing Christian voters here at home.
If you strip away the emotion, and just look for pattern recognition it becomes clear as day.
People incorrectly assume that Tucker, Curt Mills, Nick Fuentes, Ian Carroll, Candace Owens and whoever else just hopped onto the anti-Israel train are targeting Jews because they hate them. NOPE, their goal is to divide and conquer MAGA and they are paid to do it.
Evangelical Christians are the strongest pro-Israel bloc in American politics AND in MAGA.
If evangelical Christians can be mocked, demoralized, or divided (Carlson calling “Judea & Samaria = Narnia,” Candace Owens blasting “Zionist elites,” Gaetz dragging the Gospel into antisemitism debates, MTG branding Israel “genocide”) – then the MAGA coalition fractures and the Democrats win and so do our Islamo-Communist enemies in the RED-GREEN axis of Russia, China & Iran.
The Globalists say restraint. Putin, Xi, and Khamenei say multipolarity. It’s the same script — a script that benefits Beijing, Moscow, Tehran, and billionaire elites in America, while weakening MAGA, evangelical Christians and Israel.
That is why think tanks and publications like The National Conservative and the CATO Institute take money from Globalists like Koch, Soros and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Koch Industries is a global energy and commodities giant. Less U.S. confrontation and fewer sanctions means smoother trade and better profits for the Kochs. Reduced defense budgets also mean lower taxes and less regulation for the Kochs.
The Rockefeller family has long transitioned from being oil barons to climate-policy funders. “Restraint” foreign policy supports their global agenda: more climate cooperation, less defense spending “crowding out” climate budgets. It also boosts the elite networks they sit in (UN, global philanthropy.)
As long as evangelical Christians are united and vocal, it’s politically impossible for the Globalists like Koch and Soros to win. But, if they can fracture us – if they can divide us on ANY basis – they split the vote so that Democrats prevail. That’s their real goal – because Koch, Soros, the CCP and the rest of the Globalists are playing for the atheist left.
So if you want the Globalists to win, you have to first break the evangelical Christians. How do you break them? By running psyops to make sure to fracture MAGA and the Christians on Israel (or anything else for that matter.) And paying a lot of money to silence those who dare call it.”
Oh, and I believe that this same reasoning would ALSO APPLY to DIVIDING the Mormon LDS church into two parts and to dividing TPUSA into two competing factions.
Meaning, the left-wing Globalists, Team Obama AND our Islamo-Communist enemies in the RED-GREEN axis of Iran, Russia & China want to fracture not only the Evangelical church and the Catholic Church – but the Mormon LDS church AND TPUSA as well – because they all support MAGA and support Israel.
Red-Green Axis TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS OCT 5
If you haven’t figured it out yet – Communist China & Iran-Qatar (backed by the NWO and the UN) want Islamo-Communism to rule America and for our country to be divided, sick and weak. Their foot soldiers are the enemy within.
So, what better way to do that than by trying to take out President Trump and then actually taking out Charlie Kirk and dividing their followers?
UPDATED Part 7: Who killed Charlie and why? TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
SEP 23
Some people ask me why I am so tenacious about covering every detail of Charlie’s assassination. Honestly, the focus helps me deal with my grief and keeps me from crying all day long. This one hit me hard, as I know it did you.
If you don’t buy that the sudden “let’s all hate Israel” narrative is strictly political, I did a little research on the possible theology behind it – I admit I am clueless about this so I had to investigate. Here’s what I learned.
There apparently is something called “Replacement Theology” or “Super-sessionism” which claims that the Christian Church has somehow replaced Israel as God’s chosen people due to Israel’s rejection of Christ.
I’ve never heard of this before – but apparently many people have.
Replacement Theology claims that after the Jews rejected Jesus, God transferred all covenants and promises to the Christian Church.
It seems to me that Replacement Theology is wrong, man-made and not Biblical – correct?
Could this be why people like Tucker and Candace and Fuentes have gone off the deep end and chosen to reject Israel and instead appear to claim themselves as the chosen ones?
HERE’S A SHORT VIDEO FROM PASTOR JACK HIBBS ON THIS: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BRWt3kvwo/
MORE: Replacement theology rests chiefly on the idea that the whole or part of the Abrahamic Covenant has been abolished, for it is this Covenant that promises to Israel eternal ownership of the land of Canaan (Genesis 17:7-8).
Once this ‘promise’ has been removed, the present-day restoration of Israel means nothing and her only hope is in the Church. Now it must be made clear that we believe that only in Christ Jesus can there be salvation for Jews and Gentiles alike (Romans 1:16-17).
However, Biblical Christians do not believe that the promise of God in the Abrahamic Covenant bequeathing the land of Canaan to Israel has been removed, and therefore Israel’s modern restoration to the land of Canaan is indeed the fulfillment of that promise and constitutes a milestone on her ‘way home’ to her Messiah (Ezekiel 36:24-28).
So, to me that says that those who claim Replacement Theory believe Israel has no right to the land of Canaan – and that Israel is irrelevant. The New Testament does NOT state that Israel is irrelevant, however.
The New Testament describes Israel as central to end-times events, including a mass return to the land, a time of severe persecution and conflict called the “Tribulation,” and the eventual recognition of Jesus as the Messiah.
Key events include the Antichrist’s covenant and subsequent betrayal of Israel, a supernatural protection for a remnant of the Jewish people, and the Second Coming of Christ to defeat Israel’s enemies and establish a kingdom. The New Testament teaches that this will ultimately lead to a future where “all Israel will be saved,” according to Romans 11:26, when they “will see me whom they have pierced” (Zechariah 12:10).
Dennis Prager, a Jew, did an interview, from his sick bed, explaining that liberal Jews and conservative Jews are NOT the same – JUST LIKE American liberals and American conservatives are not the same!
George Soros, a liberal Jew, and Bibi Netanyahu, a conservative Jew, are not the same! In other words, Dennis believes that the ONLY reason so many RINOs, Koch Libertarians and liberals (like Tucker, Candace, and Fuentes) hate Israel today is because Bibi is a conservative! I’ve been trying to convince people of this for years but Dennis did a great job.
WATCH: https://x.com/marissastreit/status/1971366854582247843
I tried to illustrate Prager’s point this way: We are not all the same TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
OCT 29
This is something that’s been bothering me lately, because I see it abused so often by influencers and pundits – so I thought I’d write about it. I hope this helps.
After you’ve read all my evidence – what does your gut say the real reason these “influencers” want American conservatives to turn against Israel? Do you think it’s theology or politics? Do you think they believe what they say or are being paid to say it to divide and conquer MAGA? Reply to this newsletter and let me know.
Lawlessness Is a Choice Miranda Devine
OCTOBER 2025 IMPRIMIS | VOLUME 54, ISSUE 10
The following is adapted from a speech delivered on September 30, 2025, at Hillsdale College’s Blake Center for Faith and Freedom in Somers, Connecticut.
While being interviewed on a recent podcast, Texas Democrat Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett decided to opine on crime, a topic on which she apparently considers herself to be an expert. Her nutty conclusion was this: “Just because someone has committed a crime, it doesn’t make them a criminal.”
I can see how this logic would have a wide range of uses for politicians: “Just because someone told a lie, it doesn’t make them a liar”; “Just because someone took a bribe, it doesn’t make them corrupt.” It’s a bit like the thought experiment: “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” If a crime is committed and no one is responsible, was there actually a crime at all?
Of course, it’s nonsense. A criminal is defined precisely as a person who has committed a crime. But when Crockett chooses her own definitions, she is simply echoing a progressive shibboleth that has turned blue cities across the country into lawless hellholes. It holds that people who commit crimes have no agency—that they are helpless victims of circumstance. Therefore, any attempt to hold them accountable by arresting them or putting them in jail is unjust—it further victimizes them.
The obvious result of this logic is that criminals are emboldened and their real victims become helpless hostages to lawlessness.
It is a short step from Crockett’s logic to the justification of defunding the police as a way to “make communities safer.” That communities become safer by having fewer police is, of course, a lie, but defunding police is what progressives have been doing since the anti-cop, BLM-Antifa riots of the “Summer of Love” in 2020.
As a former police reporter, I’ve seen how soft-on-crime policies hurt the very people progressives pretend to care about. It’s precisely the most vulnerable in our big cities who need the most policing and have the least resources to protect themselves from mayhem.
Living in New York City off and on over the past three decades, including in the pre-Mayor Rudy Giuliani era when it was a dystopian hellscape of crime and no-go zones, it’s striking how quickly soft-on-crime policies at the state and local level destroy your day-to-day sense of safety. Progressive criminal justice “reforms,” such as defunding the police, ending cash bail, refusing to prosecute misdemeanors, letting thousands of convicted felons out of prison early, and slashing the prison population, are the most obvious contributors to the escalating violent crime problem in blue cities.
In 2014, Bill de Blasio was elected Mayor of what he boasted was “the safest big city in America.” He championed all sorts of progressive policies, from bail reform to decriminalizing offenses such as public urination and marijuana possession—and eventually the New York City Council defunded the NYPD to the tune of $1 billion.
As predicted by everybody with any understanding of human nature, it did not take long for the city to become scary. There was a surge of mentally ill homeless people accorded the so-called freedom to sleep on the streets, and open-air drug bazaars popped up all over the place. This was followed by a surge of violent crime, including a spate of people being pushed in front of subway trains. Shoplifting became so normalized that convenience and drug stores had to lock up toothpaste.
The decriminalization of pot and public urination has only turbocharged the sense of chaos and disorder in blue cities. It marks a rejection of the famous “broken windows” theory that was the key to turning New York City around under Giuliani. The theory holds that addressing minor crimes, such as vandalism and public intoxication, creates an atmosphere of order and lawfulness. By contrast, the policy of ignoring so-called minor crimes encourages disorder and lawlessness.
People don’t knowingly or willingly vote for their quality of life to deteriorate. But this is the progressive template, whether in the cities they control or on a national level with the open borders policy that, under the Biden administration, brought in 20-25 million illegal migrants, many of them criminals.
It is common sense that law and order is an 80-20 issue. You don’t need a pollster to say so, although according to a recent AP-NORC poll, 81 percent of Americans across political persuasions say crime is a “major problem.” The other 19 percent must be either criminals, progressive politicians, or both.
In a world not defined by Jasmine Crockett, it makes no sense that progressives would remain stubbornly on the wrong side of their own voters. But their unhinged hostility to President Trump’s successful crime crackdown in Washington, D.C., suggests that that’s where they are.
In the first three weeks after Trump sent the National Guard into the nation’s capital, Attorney General Pam Bondi reported 1,528 arrests and 156 illegal guns seized. Nearly half of the arrests were of illegal migrant criminals, including violent felons convicted of rape, child molestation, assault, and robbery with a deadly weapon.
The D.C. crime rate plummeted across the board as a result, with violent crime down 30 percent in the first month after federal troops were deployed on August 7, according to the White House. The Metropolitan Police Department was even more bullish, citing a 40 percent drop in violent crime when compared to the same period last year, including a staggering 82 percent drop in carjackings.
D.C. residents, most of whom are black, expressed relief at being able to live without fear of being robbed or assaulted. Yet left-wing pundits on CNN and MSNBC called Trump a “dictator” and said his crackdown on “so-called crime” is racist and a “military occupation.” Bondi had to fire two of her staff members—left-wing paralegals who hurled foul-mouthed abuse and a Subway sandwich at federal officers who are bringing order to D.C.
Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser, who had been remarkably cooperative with the federal intervention, nonetheless testified on September 18 that Trump’s National Guard deployment had nothing to do with the newly safe streets. She would rather be seen as unmoored from the truth than publicly admit that more cops and more arrests reduce crime. The hostility to law and order runs deep in a party that has made defunding the police an article of faith.
Trump is plowing ahead regardless, vowing to expand his D.C. policies to high crime cities like Chicago, Memphis, and Baltimore, which he called a “hellhole.” He is onto a popular issue and has shown that crime crackdowns can rapidly improve American lives. Ultimately he hopes to shame big-city mayors into cleaning up their own cities before he sends in the troops.
When asked by a reporter if he would consider sending the National Guard into Republican-run cities that are “also seeing high crime,” Trump replied: “Sure, but there aren’t that many of them. If you look at the top 25 cities for crime, just about every one of those cities is run by Democrats.” Cue apoplexy from the usual suspects, but he was right. If anything, he understated the problem. A 2022 report by the Heritage Foundation, “The Blue City Murder Problem,” found that 27 of the top 30 cities with the highest homicide rates were run by Democrats.
Now, inexplicably, New York City is set to elect a far-left mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who wants to decriminalize misdemeanors and divert money from cops to social workers. The Democratic Socialists of America platform he ran on when he was elected to the New York Assembly in 2021 called for decriminalizing all drugs, letting illegal immigrants vote and hold elected office, and dealing with 26-year-old criminals as youth offenders. Now he plans to make New York a double sanctuary city for illegal aliens and transgenderism, mirroring the catastrophic soft-on-crime policies of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.
Mamdani wants to ban ICE from removing violent criminals and predators, and he wants to spend millions of taxpayer dollars to create more “LGBTQIA+ Liaisons” in schools to brainwash more kids into thinking they are trapped in a body of the opposite sex. He also wants to codify transgender guidelines to force girls to share bathrooms with biological males.
Lawlessness and disorder are not inevitable in big cities. Giuliani demonstrated this 30 years ago in New York, and Trump has now proved it again in D.C. But the dwindling percentage of voters in New York who bother turning in a ballot for the mayoral race are determined to be the turkeys who voted for Thanksgiving.
The law-and-order paradox is even more stark when it comes to illegal migrant criminals. When Trump claimed on the campaign trail that other countries had opened their jails and set the inmates loose on America, it seemed like hyperbole. But among the bad hombres that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Czar Tom Homan have been arresting, there is an enormous preponderance of murderers, rapists, and child molesters.
You would think that we have enough home-grown criminals without importing new ones. But that is what Joe Biden and whoever was wielding his autopen decided willfully to do for four years while the nation’s media turned a blind eye.
After years of gaslighting and excuses from the Biden administration, Trump fulfilled his promise to secure the border within the first 100 days of his second term. But now comes the hard part: deportations. You would think every American would welcome the removal of the sorts of criminal degenerates who raped and murdered Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, and twelve-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray. But no! ICE and Border Patrol officers are under attack from violent, organized militants posing as protesters who throw rocks at their vehicles, slash their tires, and obstruct their movements. Officers have also been doxxed and labeled fascists.
Recently, an ICE officer was seriously injured when he was dragged down the road by a car driven by a criminal illegal alien resisting arrest. In January, a Border Patrol agent was ambushed and slaughtered by members of a vegan transgender cult on a murderous rampage across the country. On September 24, there was a sniper attack on an ICE facility in Dallas. That followed a July 4 shooting attack on an ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas.
The job is made more dangerous by sanctuary city laws, whereby authorities refuse to hand over violent criminal illegal aliens for deportation. DHS and ICE are conducting operations right now in Chicago, but Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson are doing everything they can to obstruct these operations.
I went on a pre-dawn raid in Chicago recently with Secretary Noem and more than 100 heavily armed Border Patrol and ICE agents. We rode in armored vehicles with helicopter and drone support to execute a felony arrest warrant on a single criminal illegal alien who had previously been deported but returned under Biden and has convictions for violent assault. It was an extraordinary commitment of resources for one criminal—although, as often happens with these raids, it netted an additional four illegal migrants who were also in the house.
Given the challenges of each deportation, it seems unlikely that Biden’s toxic border legacy can be reversed in four years, so we may be stuck with extra mayhem from foreign criminals beyond the next election cycle.
Trump’s latest law-and-order crackdown comes in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. On September 22, the President designated the violent anarchist group Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. The 22-year-old leftist who shot Kirk in the throat as he was answering a question about transgender violence at a crowded campus event in Utah had carved Antifa slogans and transgender references onto his shell casings. Despite Jimmy Kimmel’s claim, the killer was not a “MAGA Republican.” He was a radicalized leftist with a trans lover who was also a “furry”—someone with a sexual fetish involving dressing up as an animal. The assassin told family members that Kirk was hateful and that “some hate can’t be negotiated out.”
Kirk’s murder has brought to the fore the leftist political violence that has engulfed this country in recent years. Only two months ago, Kirk warned that “assassination culture is spreading on the left,” citing a poll showing that
forty-eight percent of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. Fifty-five percent said the same about Donald Trump. The left is being whipped into a violent frenzy. Any setback, whether losing an election or losing a court case, justifies a maximally violent response.
The latest wave of violence began with the deadly BLM-Antifa riots of 2020, which were tacitly encouraged by Democrats like Kamala Harris and Tim Walz as a way to destabilize then-President Trump. Then, of course, Trump was the target of two assassination attempts last year. There was the arson and vandalism against Tesla dealerships to intimidate Elon Musk and punish him for supporting Trump. In May, Israeli Embassy staffers Yaron Lischinsky and his fiancée Sarah Lynn Milgrim were assassinated, allegedly by a left-wing Palestinian activist, outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C. Even the arson attack on the home of Pennsylvania’s Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro was perpetrated by a left-wing, pro-Hamas, anti-Israel activist.
UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was assassinated in Manhattan last December, shot in the back in cold blood, allegedly by wealthy leftist Luigi Mangione, who spouted left-wing critiques of corporate greed and has become a folk hero to the Left. When Mangione appeared in a Manhattan courtroom recently, a crowd of supporters chanted, “Free Luigi,” and cheered when the judge dropped some of the charges against him.
The public outpouring of sympathy for Mangione and the callous attitude towards his victim, a midwestern father of two teenagers who worked his way to the top, seem to have altered the political discourse on violence. “Violence is never the answer,” was Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren’s verdict on Mangione. “But people can only be pushed so far.” Warren’s colleagues doubled down on their dehumanization of Trump and his supporters, branding them as fascists and Nazis. All that was needed for tragedy to ensue was an unhinged person to take them at their word.
With their dehumanizing rhetoric and soft-on-crime policies, progressives create permission structures that excuse crime and violence, remove accountability, and blur the distinction between right and wrong. As if that weren’t enough, in New York they have also created powerful disincentives for good citizens to protect themselves or others from crime.
A case in point was the persecution of former U.S. Marine Daniel Penny, who subdued a homeless, mentally ill man, Jordan Neely, as he was threatening to kill passengers on a New York subway car. Neely died soon after police arrived, and Manhattan prosecutor Alvin Bragg charged Penny with homicide. Penny was acquitted by a jury, but not before being portrayed by the media and others on the Left as a racist vigilante, despite the fact that passengers testified how scared they had been and how grateful they were that he had intervened.
It was a tragedy that there was no Good Samaritan like Penny in the light rail car in Charlotte, North Carolina, where 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was murdered with a knife by another homeless man with a lengthy criminal record. But that was the point of prosecuting Penny: to make an example of him and dissuade other valiant young men from protecting women like Iryna.
The intense blowback against Trump’s efforts to restore law and order rams home the point that it is a deliberate choice by progressives to preserve lawlessness in their cities. When you think about it, the strategy seems to have paid off, if all you care about is power, since progressives have a generational stranglehold on the cities with the worst crime.
From that skewed perspective, maybe Crockett isn’t so nutty after all.
Exposing the Red-Green Axis [12:07] Brigitte Gabriel
September 1, 2025
Islamists are murdering thousands of Christians but lefties focus only on ISRAEL’s supposed ‘sins’ By David Harsanyi
Oct. 31, 2025 New York Post
With so much of the legacy media’s focus spent on smearing Israel these days, you probably haven’t heard a ton about the ongoing massacres in Nigeria.
Islamists there have murdered tens of thousands of defenseless Christians, displacing around 15 million people from their homes.
Medieval sexual violence and torture are regularly practiced by Islamist militants, who also recruit children into their terrorist army.
The threat to the world from murderous Islamists is:
Thousands of churches and schools have been burned down.
Catholic priests are regularly targeted for kidnapping.
The victims of Boko Haram and other Islamist groups in Nigeria aren’t members of any army.
Yet, as far as I know, there have been no college protests or rallies in the streets of American cities decrying the systemic ethnic cleansing by Muslim forces.
The Israel-obsessed right-wing podcasters, who claim to stand for Christian values and decency, barely (if ever) mention the slaughter of their co-religionists.
They’re too busy with another topic.
In Sudan, another civil war has broken out.
Around 150,000 civilians have been murdered so far, while around 12 million have been displaced from their homes.
Again, Christians, along with non-Arab minorities, are among the most vulnerable.
Much like Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sudanese Armed Forces (backed by countries like Turkey and Iran) enjoy producing gleeful videos of their wanton killing sprees.
On the other side of the war is the Rapid Support Forces, who are not much better.
Not long ago they teamed up with SAF to ethnically cleanse the Sudanese population of non-Arabs.
Yet, this campaign of extermination garners no mentions from The Squad.
No Ben & Jerry’s co-founder has created a special flavor for the millions of victims of the Sudanese Islamist.
The leaders of France, Britain and Canada have yet to preen in front of the cameras as they recognize a state for the minorities of Sudan.
Then again, Christians, who predate Muslims in the Middle East by centuries, have been driven out or massacred in most Islamic nations.
In the 20 years since Iraq was freed from Saddam Hussein, the Christian population has shrunk from 1.4 million to around 120,000.
In Syria, the Christian population has dramatically contracted, as well, and is in constant danger.
Christians made up somewhere around 80% of the Lebanese population at one point.
Now it is under 30%.
In Turkey, where Muslims have hit a hat trick of genocides (Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks), the Christian population has shrunk from around 20% to somewhere around 0.2%.
The Coptic Christians of Egypt live in constant fear.
The Christian population in both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank significantly decreased since Palestinians took control.
If Israel annexed Christ’s birthplace, Bethlehem, tomorrow, of course, the Christian population would immediately explode.
It’s difficult not to notice that Islamists are generally given a pass by the same Westerners who spend their days accusing Israel of war crimes.
Not that Israel-obsessives care about Muslim victims, either, mind you, if the oppressor isn’t a Westerner.
In Yemen, Iran-funded Houthis have sparked another civil war.
Somewhere around 17 million people teeter on the edge of starvation daily, including over a million children.
You won’t see any flotillas packed with privileged celebrities dressed in keffiyehs headed to a Yemeni port to feed children in hunger.
Of course not. Unlike the Israelis, who gave activists air-conditioned rooms and airline tickets back to the comforts of their European homes, the Houthis would almost surely be less gracious.
There are no protests over Turkish ethnic cleansing efforts of Kurds from their own nation to northern Syria and Iraq.
There are no big banners flown at left-wing protests condemning the Chinese Communists’ ethnic cleansing campaigns against Uighurs, Tibetans, Dzungar and Hui and others.
The Democratic Party’s mayoral candidate in New York City, who’s spent his adult life pretending to be a humanitarian, doesn’t think it worth mentioning this barbarism.
Those who rail against AIPAC never seem to care about the billions of dollars the petro-sheiks of Qatar dump into our institutions to corrode Western values.
Conversion to Christianity, incidentally, is still an apostasy in Qatar, punishable by the death sentence.
Do the young people, left and right, who’ve been propagandized into believing that Israel — and American Jews — are their enemy understand all of this is going on? Probably not.
Israel’s imaginary genocide dominates news coverage because progressives are obsessed with “colonizers” and the populist social-media bigots use the Jewish state to spread their own paranoia.
If they’re interested, however, there is plenty of real ethnic cleansing to protest.
