COMMENTARY / OPINION
Vigilant Fox: Tucker Carlson, “They’re Going to STEAL the Election” By Vigilant Fox
Mar. 8, 2024 3:20 pm – This article originally appeared on VigilantNews.com and was republished with permission.
“And we know they’re going to steal the election because they’re now saying so out loud.”
Carlson declared, “Joe Biden can’t win in a fair election. Joe Biden will lose in November. He cannot win. That’s the thing that nobody in any media wants to say out loud. In a fair election, Joe Biden cannot win.”
He highlighted that media pundits like Chris Hayes are gaslighting the public by saying things like “Joe Biden is good at politics.” But Carlson contested how Joe Biden can be “good at politics” when Trump is crushing him in the polls.
A New York Times/Siena College poll found that Biden’s support is at 43 percent, trailing 5 points behind Trump’s 48 percent among registered voters.
New Deals At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Up to 71% Off With Promo Code TGP
“Joe Biden is getting stomped by Donald Trump, but he’s also, at the same time, ‘good at politics’? Carlson asked. “Right.” (sarcasm)
“So what does that tell you?” he posed. “Well, they’re going to steal the election,” he answered. “And we know they’re going to steal the election because they’re now saying so out loud.”
Carlson played a clip of Attorney General Merrick Garland saying that it is “discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary” to require voter ID.
“The chief law enforcement officer of the United States government is telling you that it’s immoral, in fact racist, in fact illegal, to ask people for their IDs when they vote to verify they are who they say they are. What is that?” Carlson asked.
Carlson challenged claims that voter ID laws are discriminatory because they prevent people of color, particularly Black individuals, from voting due to a supposed lack of access to government-issued ID. He finds this argument contradictory because living in the U.S. requires a government-issued ID for many essential activities, such as flying, banking, interacting with government agencies, staying in hotels, and using credit cards.
The conservative commentator also pointed out the irony in the push towards a cashless society by some of the same people who argue against voter ID laws, noting that even attending events or making purchases now often requires a credit card, which in turn requires an ID. He suggests there’s a double standard in considering it racist to require ID for voting but not for other aspects of life that require identification.
“Have you been to a stadium event recently?” Carlson posed. “No cash accepted. You have to have a credit card. And in order to get a credit card, you need a state-issued ID. And somehow, that’s not racist. But it is racist to ask people to prove their identity when they choose the next president of the United States.”
This timeless video clip below affirms that African Americans DO regularly carry around ID.
“That [painting voter ID as discriminatory] is a lie. It’s an easily provable lie. And anyone telling that lie is advocating for mass voter fraud, which the attorney general is,” remarked Carlson.
“There’s no other way to read it. So you should know that you live in a country where the attorney general is abetting, in fact, calling for voter fraud. And that’s the only chance they have to get their guy reelected.”
Disparate Impact Thinking Is Destroying Our Civilization Heather Mac Donald
Manhattan Institute FEBRUARY 2024 | VOLUME 53, ISSUE 2
The following is adapted from a talk delivered on February 15, 2024, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Naples, Florida.
The most consequential falsehood in American public policy today is the idea that any racial disparity in any institution is by definition the result of racial discrimination.
If a cancer research lab, for example, does not have 13 percent black oncologists—the black share of the national population—it is by definition a racist lab that discriminates against competitively qualified black oncologists; if an airline company doesn’t have 13 percent black pilots, it is by definition a racist airline company that discriminates against competitively qualified black pilots; and if a prison population contains more than 13 percent black prisoners, our law enforcement system is racist.
The claim that racial disparities are proof of racial discrimination has been percolating in academia and the media for a long time. After the George Floyd race riots of 2020, however, it was adopted by America’s most elite institutions, from big law and big business to big finance. Even museums and orchestras took up the cry.
Many thought that STEM—the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics—would escape the diversity sledgehammer. They were wrong. The American Medical Association today insists that medicine is characterized by white supremacy. Nature magazine declares that science manifests one of “humankind’s worst excesses”: racism. The Smithsonian Institution announces that “emphasis on the scientific method” and an interest in “cause and effect relationships” are part of totalitarian whiteness.
As a result of this falsehood, we are eviscerating meritocratic and behavioral standards in accordance with what is known as “disparate impact analysis.”
Consider medicine. Step One of the medical licensing exam, taken during or after the second year of medical school, tests medical students’ knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pathology. On average, black students score lower on the grading curve, making it harder for them to land their preferred residencies. Step One, in other words, has a “disparate impact” on black medical students. The solution, implemented last year, was to eliminate the Step One grading disparity by instituting a pass–fail system. Hospitals choosing residents can no longer distinguish between high and low achieving students—and that is precisely the point!
The average Medical College Achievement Test (MCAT) score for black applicants is a standard deviation below the average score of white applicants. Some medical schools have waived the submission of MCAT scores altogether for black applicants. The tests were already redesigned to try to eliminate the disparity. A quarter of the questions now focus on social issues and psychology. The medical school curriculum is being revised to offer more classes in white privilege and focus less on clinical practice. The American Association of Medical Colleges will soon require that medical faculty demonstrate knowledge of “intersectionality”—a theory about the cumulative burdens of discrimination. Heads of medical schools and chairmen of departments like pediatric surgery are being selected on the basis of identity, not knowledge.
Col. Douglas Macgregor: “I do not think we’ll get to the 2024 election” By Noah
Mar 7, 2024 – A lot of people are speaking out and saying they don’t believe we will reach a 2024 Election.
Won’t make it.
Can’t make it.
The system is going to crash and crumble under the weight of the destruction caused by the Biden Regime.
And that’s fine when “regular people” like you or me say it on Twitter, I don’t tend to write a story about it.
But when a highly respected GOOD retired Colonel like Col. Douglas Macgregor (one of the good guys!) says it, that’s when I pay special attention.
Here’s what he just posted on 12/1/23:
Douglas Macgregor@DougAMacgregor 9:47 PM · Dec 1, 2023
I do not think we’ll get to the 2024 election.
Things are going to implode in Washington before then.
Our economic financial condition is fragile.
It’s going to come home to roost in ugly ways.
[Ed.: What a pessimist! He’s almost worse than me!]
October 7 Videos From South First Responders Chananya Weissman
March 8, 2024 – South First Responders collected and shared a huge amount of photos and videos from October 7, from dash cams, surveillance cameras, GoPros worn by the invading army, and other sources. Much of this shows the attacks in graphic detail, and contradicts any attempts to justify what took place or explain away the demonic evil of those responsible for it.
I put together a series of videos from this material that contradicts the official timeline of events and shows incontrovertible evidence that the residents of the south were knowingly thrown to the wolves. We must assume that everyone throughout the chain of command — EVERYONE — knew what was happening and let it happen.
Right, left, middle, up, down…doesn’t matter. They are ALL responsible, and we should assume they are all guilty of letting this happen, participating in a cover up, and quite possibly much worse, until proven innocent.
The video is available here.
Descriptions are adapted from those provided by South First Responders, with my own commentary added. There is disturbing footage; viewer discretion advised.
South First Responders Main channel: https://t.me/s/southfirstresponders
Arabic: https://t.me/southfirstresponders_ar
French: https://t.me/South_First_Responders_French
The first video shows Arab invaders calmly looting at the Nova festival as smoke from the carnage billows in the background. Notice the time is 12:09 in the afternoon, many hours after the invasion and massacre took place. The attackers appear calm and relaxed going about their looting. Although they are exposed in a wide open area in broad daylight at one of the main sites of the invasion, they show no concern that a heavy military response might come at any moment, or even a targeted missile strike, as one would normally expect.
*
The next video is from security cameras at Kibbutz Be’eri. Notice the time is 9:06 in the morning. The Arab invaders calmly and methodically drag a dead victim out of his car and proceed to loot him and his vehicle, before driving it away. Notice at 3:27 the relaxed position of the Arab in the passenger seat, clearly not on alert. Once again they behave as one would only behave if he somehow knew that there would be no military response coming anytime soon.
*
The next videos show mass looting in Kibbutz Be’eri. At 10:41 we see one looter, who appears to be unarmed, stealing a television. In what universe would an ordinary citizen from Gaza dare to follow an invading force into a war zone hours after this shocking attack and travel to a Kibbutz many kilometers from the breached border expecting to steal a television and make it back the way he came safely?
Hamas Is Suddenly Popular In Egypt BY HUGH FITZGERALD
MAR 7, 2024 2:00 PM – For decades, Hamas was not popular in Egypt. It was seen, rightly, as the local branch, in “Palestine,” of the Muslim Brotherhood. And the Muslim Brotherhood has been fought by every Egyptian regime since that of King Farouk. Gamal Abdel Nasser fought the Brotherhood. After Anwar Sadat, once a Brotherhood supporter, signed the Camp David Accords with Israel in 1979, the Brotherhood called for his overthrow. Sadat crushed the Brotherhood, and for that, he was assassinated in 1981 by the Tanzim al-Jihad, an Islamic group allied to the Brotherhood. Hosni Mubarak also fought the Brotherhood during his 30 years of rule (1981-2011). After he was overthrown in a popular uprising, a caretaker regime took over, quickly followed by the first truly democratic election in Egypt’s history. Held in 2012, Mohamed Morsi, a member of the Freedom and Justice Party that was affiliated with the Brotherhood, was elected President. A year later, he was ousted in a coup d’etat by General Abdelfattah Al-Sisi, whose regime has continued to fight the Muslim Brotherhood, and naturally, it has also opposed Hamas. Most Egyptians have been inculcated with the belief that Hamas, as a part of the MB, is a danger to Egypt’s wellbeing. That is, they were ready to believe the worst of Hamas — until the last few months. More on the sea change in Egyptian popular attitudes toward Hamas since October 7 can be found here: “Egyptians used to hate Hamas. Now they love them.” Elder of Ziyon, March 5, 2024:
“The Fikra Forum of the Washington Institute asked Egyptians in November/December what they thought of Hamas after the October 7 massacres.
While we had seen other polls showing broad approval of Hamas’ terrorist attacks in the Arab world, this one is especially interesting because it compares Egyptian attitudes of Hamas after October 7 with their historic disapproval of the group.
The turnaround in Egyptian attitudes towards Hamas is stunning.
The Incredible Hunger in Gaza BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
MAR 7, 2024 3:00 PM – “We have seen reports of families eating leaves or animal feed.” – Kamala Harris
“What we are seeing every day in Gaza is devastating. We have seen reports of families eating leaves or animal feed, women giving birth to malnourished babies with little or no medical care, and children dying from malnutrition and dehydration,” Kamala Harris claimed in a recent speech.
Such claims have been widely spread by the UN and the media. But the reality on social media is quite different.
When the Biden administration air-dropped aid into Gaza, the locals filmed themselves throwing it away.
And far from eating “eating leaves or animal feed” as Kamala claimed, there’s enough shawarma there to feed a small army. Or whatever is left of Hamas.
Hamas and the US Pushing Israel into the Ramadan Trap [29:40] Caroline Glick
March 7, 2024 JNS TV- As Ramadan approaches, dangerous new developments have unfolded: Biden is pushing for a stop in the fighting without guaranteeing the freeing of the hostages and the US Security Council resolution is now calling for an immediate ceasefire while Hamas calls for an intifada.
[Ed.:
Advancing the Goals of the Fraudulent Protocols By Alex Grobman
March 7, 2024
Part III
In the estimation of historian Robert S. Wistrich, practically “no other single text in the annals of antisemitism would have such a deadly effect as the Protocols in preparing the Holocaust or inspiring hatred of the Jewish state in 1948.” No one could have envisioned that such an obvious forgery would become such a major success.
Today, new editions and reprints of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” are still published throughout Eastern Europe and Asia, as well as on the internet, where there are thousands of sites that distribute the Protocols or expose them as canards. The notion of Jews as a demonic character is still prevalent in these areas, allowing antisemites to use the Protocols to incite hatred against Jews, particularly during times of political and social unrest when there exists an environment of anxiety, uncertainty and an obsession with conspiracy theories.
Article 32 of Hamas Charter
The sheer popularity in the Muslim media of the form of antisemitism practiced by Hamas, Iran and Hezbollah including the Protocols. Article 32 of the Hamas Charter states: “The Islamic Resistance Movement calls on Arab and Islamic nations to take up the line of serious and persevering action to prevent the success of this horrendous plan, to warn the people of the danger emanating from leaving the circle of struggle against Zionism. Today it is Palestine, tomorrow it will be one country or another. The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”
Antisemitism Is Part of the Ideological Center of Modern Jihadism
As far back as 2008, Wistrich warned that Islamism can no longer be viewed as merely an “extreme,” for it is becoming more and more mainstream.
Antisemitism is part of the ideological center of modern jihadism, and not simply an additional component, asserts Matthias Küntzel, a German political scientist and historian. He argues that “during and after the World War II, the center of global antisemitism shifted from Nazi Germany to the Arab world, above all to the radical Islamist currents in and around the Moslem Brotherhood of Egypt.” This shift did not occur only because of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Quite the reverse. The “ideology of and policy of radical Islamists” actually made the clash worse.
Why Torture Is A Failed Policy And Practice By Larry Johnson
Mar. 7, 2024 7:00 am – Judge Napolitano was the inspiration for doing this post. He wrote an excellent piece in the Daily Wire last week commenting on the apparent collapse of the criminal case against Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9-11 attacks. The Judge wrote:
As the pre-trial hearings in the case of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and others who are charged with masterminding the 9/11 attacks proceed at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, the government continues to stumble with its own witnesses. In hearings last week, government lawyers tried to demonstrate that statements the defendants made to CIA and FBI agents were voluntary.
When the government’s principal torturer, a now-retired psychologist, had difficulty recalling that during a torture session he threatened one of his victims by offering to slit the throat of the victim’s young son and that he had recounted that threat under oath in previous testimony, it became apparent to all in the courtroom and to those of us who monitor these awful proceedings that the government was encountering a strange and unexpected difficulty in defending the behavior of its torturers.
The Judge’s judicial instincts are spot on. But there is much more to this story. The American public, and much of the world, have been bamboozled into believing that torture is an effective interrogation technique. It is not. It is counter productive.
Hollywood and novelists have played a key role in my view of popularizing torture as a necessary evil. The TV show, 24, featuring Kiefer Sutherland as Jack Bauer, routinely relied to torture to get info out of terrorists. Hell, even Supreme Court Justice Scalia, when he was alive, believed Jack Bauer had the right to torture:
“Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. … He saved hundreds of thousands of lives,” Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling Season 2, where the agent’s rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.
“Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?” Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. “Say that criminal law is against him? ‘You have the right to a jury trial?’ Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don’t think so.
“So the question is really whether we believe in these absolutes. And ought we believe in these absolutes.”
Then there is the late Vince Flynn. As you can see from the image posted at the top of this piece, I was friends with Vince — at least until he because famous — and helped him with his first five books. His views on torture are his own. I suggested otherwise, but he explains his thinking in this interview with Robert Bidinotto:
From Isreal: “Very Tough Days Ahead!!” by Arlene Kushner
March 6, 2024 – I can hear my readers asking, “But wait! Hasn’t Israel been embroiled in some very tough days for some time now?”
Indeed! But we are gearing up for increased difficulties with the beginning of Ramadan on March 10. Ramadan: the “holy” Muslim month that has a long-standing tradition of violence against Jews.
Part of that Ramadan tradition involves focusing violence on Har Habayit, the Temple Mount. Here we see a scene from the Mount, complete with Hamas flags, two years ago.
There is a reason for that focus on Har Habayit. As the site of the two Temples of the Jewish people, it provides evidence of the ancient Jewish presence here – a presence that far precedes even the existence of Islam, never mind Muslim presence in the land. The goal is to undercut Israel’s right to the land by demonstrating that the Mount is in the rightful possession of the Muslims. They seek to delegitimize Jewish historical claims.
Do not, for a moment, underestimate the symbolic significance of the Mount in what is essentially a religious war.
More on Har Habayit follows below.
Profile of a Political Agitator by Mordechai Nisan
March 6, 2024 – Ehud Barak, noteworthy Israeli army general with a highly decorated military career, acquired public notoriety last year for his role in masterminding, organizing, and financing, the sweeping protest campaign against judicial reform in Israel. Throughout 2023, prior to the slaughter of October 7, he and his like-minded political allies sowed chaos in the streets, intimidated citizens, mobilized strikes, incited army reservists, and brought Israel to the precipice of civil war. They engaged in a so-called non-violent struggle for democracy, speaking on behalf of entrenched elites in Israeli society, while charging that the elected government of Binyamin Netanyahu was illegitimate. Now, with the Gaza war still unfolding, the protesters are back in the streets.
Ehud Barak, prior to adopting a militant stance in the domestic political arena, had been at the pivot of Israel’s decision-making axis. On the most critical national issues touching on Israel’s security and survival, we can illuminate the man’s incapacity for sound judgment and responsible leadership.
Peace in our Time
Israel’s craving for peace found in Barak a dedicated crusader. As the IDF Chief-of-Staff (1991-1995), two political challenges demanded his participation. He implemented the controversial Oslo Accord in its military dimensions regarding Israeli withdrawal in 1994 from Gaza and Jericho. Aside from the contentious Palestinian issue, Barak was also involved in negotiations with Syria and determined that Hafez al-Assad was ready for peace. Withdrawal from the Golan Heights, and expelling 17,000 Israeli citizens, were the essential conditions in trying to consummate Israeli-Arab peace between Israel and Syria.
To his dismay, the Oslo track was set on fire, and the Syrian track remained blocked; but Barak remained adamant to walk the road to peace.
In 1999, Ehud Barak defeated Netanyahu in the direct election for the premiership and set about again to negotiate withdrawal from the Golan and reach peace with Syria. In January the following year at Shepherdstown, West Virginia, PM Barak pursued a political settlement with Syria through the mediation of President Clinton. The president told Assad that Barak accepts Syria’s presence proximate to the east bank of the Sea of Galilee, after an Israeli pullback from the Golan with demilitarization arrangements. Ultimately, Barak failed to reach an agreement with the obstreperous Assad, his heavy investment in time, energy, and reputation coming to naught.
Not to Barak’s credit, Israel continues to control the high-ground 60 kilometers from Mount Bental on the Golan Heights
[Ed.:
Jonathan Pollard: Itamar Ben Gvir Will Blast Off [20:09] Machon Shilo
March 6, 2024 – Discussion between former Prisoner of Zion, Jonathan Pollard and the head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim
THIS WILL BLOW YOU AWAY! Batya Ungar-Sargon a Liberal from New York Explains the MAGA Philosophy Like No One Else Ever! – BRILLIANT! (VIDEO 14:54) By Jim Hoft
Mar. 6, 2024 4:00 pm – Batya Ungar-Sargon‘s interview this week from The War Room with Steve Bannon was like no other.
Batya, a former liberal from Queens and an opinion editor at Newsweek, shared her journey from hardcore New York leftist to Trump supporter. And it is amazing! They way she describes Trump Nation is just perfect. The left will never get this. The elites will never understand this. And yet this is why the fear him and his MAGA movement.
Trump speaks for the working American. Trump represents the working American and American Greatness. The elites can never break that bond he has with the American people.
Batya says, “Donald Trump is like a New Deal Democrat.”
Steve Bannon: I want to talk about, you say you’re a liberal or progressive, yet this book is, I know you’re going to come out with a bigger media campaign later, but Second Class is one of the definitive works out there. It’s about to come out. How do you say you’re a liberal? When I read it, and I feel like I’m reading a MAGA writer?
Batya Ungar-Sargon: Well, to me, Donald Trump is kind of like a New Deal Democrat. And this is something I tried to explain to Bill Maher, as well. To Democrats and liberals, Trump is an extremist, but to Trump supporters, he is a moderate, if not a liberal. His view on abortion, 16 weeks, right? That was the Democrats view until the 90s. His view on immigration, that mass migration is class warfare against the working class. That was the view of the Democrats until the 90s. Bernie Sanders in 2015, open borders. That’s a Koch brothers proposal. Right? You remember that Trump is pro-black. He’s courting black voters. He’s pro-gay. I hear that from his supporters all the time, and they love that about him. That is who the Democrats used to be, and now it is who MAGA is. And I say that with a lot of love and respect.
Steve Bannon: So how talk about that as a liberal, you’ve been outcast because you take the side of the working class. So how can that be? The Democrats tell us all the time they’re a working class party.
Batya Ungar-Sargon: No, that’s complete nonsense. The Democrats are the party of the college credentialed elites and the dependent poor. So all of their policies are either about flattering the vanity of the rich or sustaining the poor. That won’t work. And meanwhile, everybody in the middle, the hardworking people who listen to your show, who you know about and who you respect, they were not represented by either party until Trump came along. And Trump showed up and said, wait a minute. Why is no one standing up for the hardworking American? And what I did for this book is I traveled around the country and interviewed working class Americans. And let me tell you something, Steve, and you know this. Working class Americans, whether they vote for Democrat or Republican, whether they’re liberal or conservative, they all have the same views. Like, neither party is really speaking to them. They all agree by and large about the most important issues. Polarization is a totally elite phenomenon…
…So the elites are very, very polarized. If you talk to someone who’s been to college, conservative or liberal, somebody who works in the media elites, somebody who works in the political elites, they look at the party platform, whether it’s the GOP platform or the democratic platform, and they’re like, check, check. Whatever the party tells them is the good and the right they agree with. So there’s no natural connection between supporting abortion on demand and believing in climate change and supporting an open border. Those things were cobbled together because they are all in the interests of the leftist elites. And so if you’re in those leftist elites, you’re like, oh, these are all my priorities. If you are a hardworking american, those are not your priorities. You go issue by issue and say, well, I’m a Christian, so I would never get an abortion, but I know somebody who was raped, so I don’t want it to be banned. You say, well, I have a family member who’s gay, and I want them to be treated with dignity, but I have a child school and I’m terrified of the trans agenda. Right. You have this because the american working class is deeply tolerant, and so that is how they approach the world.
You can catch the rest in the video.
Batya Ungar-Sargon has a book coming out in a month – Second Class.
Disturbing Warnings Of Dangers To Come As Globalists Prepare To Take Down The Internet, Allowing Them To Rewrite History, While ‘Criminal Invaders’ Are Set Loose Across America [8:51] By Stefan Stanford – Live Free Or Die – All News Pipeline
– They’ll Be Paid By The US Govt To Hunt Down And Kill Americans
With ‘Super Tuesday’ now over and Donald Trump cementing his position as the March 6, 2024 – Republican party nominee in November, (short of something drastic and horrific being carried out by Democrats or their ‘agents of terror’ they’ve allowed to come stampeding in,) all of the recent internet outages we’ve been witnessing over the past several months, including Facebook, Instagram and Messenger being knocked off line globally on Tuesday, may be warnings of something much bigger to come as we race towards November.
Because with Joe Biden looking totally ‘unelectable’ to even many Democrats, and Donald Trump looking almost like a sure thing in November if the left can’t someway find a way to put a final stop to him, we’ve long warned on ANP that if the left believes they won’t be able to ‘win’ the election in November legally, they’ll figure out another way to hold on to power in the coming years, no matter how illegal or immoral or violent it might be.
With retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor recently joining Tucker Carlson to warn America that one way they might do that would be to quite literally turn the ‘criminal invaders’ that are flowing into our nation into the Democrats own private army, set loose into our country, fully armed by our govt via the American taxpayer, to hunt down and kill Americans as heard in the 1st video at the bottom of this story, as Colonel Macgregor bluntly warns Carlson, “What better solution than finding people who have no connection to the American people, arming them, and then sending them out to oppress us?”
As Carlson and Macgregor warn us, the Democrat-proposed “Courage to Serve Act“ would offer illegal migrants an expedited path to citizenship if they serve in the U.S. military as it continues missing recruitment goals (thanks largely to the unpopular globalist wars and far-left ideology being pushed on soldiers.) And with proof that a huge segment of those ‘criminal invaders’ who are flowing in are fighting age men from countries who consider America their ‘enemies,’ what could go wrong?
As Tucker warns us in this new tweet over at ‘X,’ “First you allow your country to be invaded, then you hand automatic weapons to the people who invaded it. Doug Macgregor on the worst idea congress has ever had.”
And with reports that an Iranian assassin is allegedly already on the loose here in America, claimed to be targeting Trump era officials to be ‘eliminated,’ imagine the damage which that one man could do, much less the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of potential terrorists that the Biden-Obama crime cabal has allowed in, to see the much bigger picture.
Is Gantz betraying Netanyahu? Jeffrey Ludwig
it is important that the theme of the present war be emphasized as a struggle that is not merely political but a struggle of Good vs. Evil. Opinion
Mar 6, 2024, 3:53 PM (GMT+2) – A recent article by Jonathan Tobin discusses Benny Gantz meeting with the Biden administration without the express endorsement of said meeting by PM Benjamin Netanyahu. The article by Tobin seems to be against the meeting, but does not go as far as this writer would in denouncing such a meeting. Gantz’s “meeting” with Biden is more of a vicious betrayal than that depicted by Tobin. It is almost like Brutus participating in the slaying of Caesar when Shakespeare has Caesar saying “et tu Brute?!”
Biden is stupid and has the integrity of a tarantula. He has been unfit for office since he was first elected as the youngest Senator in Congress.
Tobin underestimates the dark and evil nature of these meetings and plottings of the Biden administration. Israel is the high ground, the U.S. government is the low ground, and Hamas, the PLO, Fatah, and Qatar, are the lowest ground (below ground and in Hamas’ case, literally) in terms of goals and ethics. We can only cry to the great God of the Universe to uphold Israel in the face of so many sinister negotiators and to give her victory over her enemies!!
Biden feels smart compared to Kamala, but he has been an airhead and liar throughout his entire life. In addition to his publicized lying, I saw a portion of his questioning Clarence Thomas before the Senate Judiciary Committee when Thomas was nominated to be a SCUSA justice. Biden kept repeating “you and I both know about this natural law thing….” Thomas during an interview many years later said, “I have no idea what he was talking about…didn’t then and don’t now.”
My criticism of Jonathan Tobin is that he is correct only up to a point. In this recent article as in many articles, he underestimates the evil in the hearts of many of Israel’s “friends” as well as the cosmic significance of these events. Political events in Israel, especially regarding her Arab neighbors and citizens, have a significance that raises questions of good and evil extending beyond the political landscape.
In this regard, Gantz appears to me to be a loose cannon. If he would agree to meet individually with Biden and his team of educated screw-ups (Blinken et al.) this represents a self-centeredness incompatible with the welfare of Israel. Israel is a God-ordained country in a unique sense (there’s a less unique sense in which every country is God-ordained) whether or not any individual leader in Israel or elsewhere acknowledges that.
[Ed.: In the land of IINO, the right hand literally does not know what the left hand is doing! Netanyahu wasn’t even told about the October 7th invasion until it was already 14 hours in progress! God nailed it when he asked Jonah: … “Should I not then spare the great city of Nineveh with more than a hundred and twenty thousand human beings, who do not know their right hand from their left, and so much cattle?” – The Book of Jonah]
Europe will soon face a direct Arab invasion Alexander Maistrovsky
It is a case of predator and prey right before the jump. From the Arabs’ point of view, their time has come. Opinion.
Mar 5, 2024, 11:06 AM (GMT+2) – In April 711, the governor of Tangier, Tariq ibn Ziyad, with only 9 thousands of his soldiers landed in Iberia. By 719, the Arabs were already standing near Toulouse, and in 720 – they were at the Rhone delta. The Iberian Peninsula was captured in less than 10 years. This was a stunning success; medieval Europe was not ready for anything like this.
Arabs are excellent psychologists. They “feel their enemy”, analyze his weaknesses and strengths, draw conclusions from their victories and defeats – at different times and in different places. And they are infinitely faithful to their dream: the revival of the Caliphate. This aim justifies all means.
The key event that changed the collective consciousness of the Arab world was the victory in Afghanistan over the Soviet army. A powerful totalitarian superpower that had neither moral doubts, nor reflections was defeated by irregular formations of the “Mujahideen.” That was the first turning point. If the “Mujahideen” were able to win the Soviet army, then what would prevent them from coping with the loose, insecure, notorious, and confused West?
This gave impetus to Islamic ambitions, the consequences of which were 9/11, mass terror, al-Qaeda, ISIS.
The second turning point was the panicked and chaotic flight of the US from Afghanistan. The most powerful army of the Western world, abandoning its weapons and allies, fled in front of the irregular Taliban units, which entered Kabul without firing a single shot.
On October 7, Islam won (“thanks” to the Israeli military and intelligence establishment) its third brilliant victory. Regardless of whether Israel succeeds in uprooting the Hamas structure in Gaza or not, this bloody raid has already gone down in history as a symbol of Muslim triumph. The “Zionist entity”, until now yet another hard nut to crack in the path of Muslim aspirations, was (temporarily or not, we have to find out) thrown under the hooves of the Islamic horsemen. Thus a new milestone appeared on the path to the longed-for dream.
There is no doubt that this success is now being studied by the Arabs and will be reproduced: in another place and another time.
Where?
The answer is obvious – Europe. It suggests itself to you.
First is the motive. The Arabs began to dream of conquering the Old World immediately after the so-called “Arab Spring”, enthusiastically supported by stupid Western liberals.
Let’s recollect:
The fiends’ frustration BENJAMIN KERSTEIN
The pro-Hamas fifth column can’t understand why it’s losing, and how independent scholars can save us from the dictatorship of the professoriate.
MAR 5, 2024 – I’ve read several articles in recent days about the attempt by Hamas supporters to intimidate Joe Biden into turning against Israel by voting “uncommitted” in the Democratic primaries.
Interestingly, almost all of those interviewed said they voted “uncommitted” because all else has failed, especially the mob events they’ve attended. So, they’re going the way of the suicide bomber and threatening to kill the Democratic party, even if it puts Trump in office.
This argument has been used to justify literal suicide. Supporters of the mentally ill man who immolated himself outside the Israeli embassy in DC have praised him for raising the “protest” stakes in the face of persistent failure.
Obviously, there’s quite a lot to say about this, but I am particularly interested in what the “uncommitted” self-immolators whining says about themselves.
I think it says two things: a) These people are morally arrogant on a world-historical scale and b) they are completely incapable of self-reflection and self-criticism.
Elon Musk Issues Grave Warning for America: “The Groundwork is Being Laid for Something Far Worse than 9/11” By Cullen Linebarger
Mar. 5, 2024 2:00 pm – X Owner Elon Musk has a dire warning for America following the news of the Biden regime secretly flying hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens, as TGP reported this morning.
The Regime claims 320,000 unvetted aliens have been flown across the country to “reduce” the number of crossings across the border. This, of course, is an outright lie.
It is unknown where these migrants are arriving from. Information from The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) reveals the Regime claims the locations are kept hidden because “bad actors” could inflict harm on public safety, and the information could potentially create law enforcement vulnerabilities.
In a post on X this morning, Musk revealed the REAL reason behind the Biden regime’s scheme: importing and spreading around new voters who will reliably vote Democrat to ensure a permanent majority.
Musk notes the Regime’s selfish desire is creating a severe national security threat based on the sheer number of illegal aliens alone. Due to this, he warns, “the groundwork is being laid for something far worse than 9/11.
This administration is both importing voters and creating a national security threat from unvetted illegal immigrants.
It is highly probable that the groundwork is being laid for something far worse than 9/11. Just a matter of time.
The Great Election Fraud: Manufactured Choices Make a Mockery of Our Republic By John & Nisha Whitehead
“Dictators are not in the business of allowing elections that could remove them from their thrones.”— Gene Sharp, political science professor
March 05, 2024 – The U.S. Supreme Court was right to keep President Trump’s name on the ballot.
The high court’s decree that the power to remove a federal candidate from the ballot under the Constitution’s “insurrectionist ban” rests with Congress, not the states, underscores the fact that in a representative democracy, the citizenry—not the courts, not the corporations, and not the contrived electoral colleges—should be the ones to elect their representatives.
Unfortunately, what is being staged is not an election. It is a mockery of an election.
This year’s presidential election, much like every other election in recent years, is what historian Daniel Boorstin referred to as a “pseudo-event”: manufactured, contrived, confected and devoid of any intrinsic value save the value of being advertised.
For the next eight months, Americans will be dope-fed billions of dollars’ worth of political propaganda aimed at persuading them that 1) their votes count, 2) the future of this nation—nay, our very lives—depends on who we elect as president, and 3) electing the right candidate will fix everything that is wrong with this country.
Incredible, isn’t it, that in a country of more than 330 million people, we are given only two choices for president?
The system is rigged, of course.
Forcing the citizenry to choose between two candidates who are equally unfit for office does not in any way translate to having some say in how the government is run.
Indeed, no matter what names are on the presidential ballot, once you step away from the cult of personality politics, you’ll find that beneath the power suits, they’re all alike.
The candidate who wins the White House has already made a Faustian bargain to keep the police state in power.
We’ve been down this road before.
Barack Obama campaigned on a message of hope, change and transparency, and promised an end to war and surveillance. Yet under Obama, government whistleblowers were routinely prosecuted, U.S. arms sales skyrocketed, police militarization accelerated, and surveillance became widespread.
Donald Trump swore to drain the swamp in Washington DC. Instead of putting an end to the corruption, however, Trump paved the way for lobbyists, corporations, the military industrial complex, and the Deep State to feast on the carcass of the dying American republic.
We’ve been mired in this swamp for decades now.
“Nothing Will Make Sense To You Unless You Accept That The 2020 Election Was Stolen…” by Drew Allen
TUESDAY, MAR 05, 2024 – 07:43 AM – During the debut of his new Saturday show on the General Michael Flynn-backed Patriot TV, Drew Allen – host of the Drew Allen Show – opened by claiming the Democrats stole the 2020 election.
“They cheated!” Allen says plainly.
Allen, of course, isn’t the first to say it. While the claim isn’t novel, his explanation is—and brilliant too.
Allen says:
“I want you to listen very carefully. This is very, very important. In fact, it’s the key to understanding the world that we’re living in right now in the United States of America. Nothing that is happening can make sense to you unless you understand one thing. And this is something that you are forbidden from believing. Alright, this is the key to everything. Are you ready? The Democrats stole the 2020 election. They cheated! Alright, if you believe that, you can understand what’s going on. You have a lens to comprehend the world that we’re living in—the insanity. But if you don’t believe it, nothing makes sense.”
Allen explains that when the Democrats started prosecuting Trump, “what they thought was gonna happen is that the American people were going to abandon Trump.”
He points out that “…it didn’t. It had the opposite impact. It backfired on them. What actually happened was Donald Trump’s poll numbers improved. Improved! So they didn’t know what to do. They had to double down on that strategy.”
“They want a Richard Nixon situation,” Allen points out “and it didn’t happen. They cannot fathom that Trump is still standing.”
Allen plays a clip of Democrat lawyer Marc Elias to prove his point.
In the clip Elias says:
“how they decided that the candidate who is going to be best as their standard bearer is Donald Trump, is not just sickening from a standpoint of American politics, but is actually baffling from a matter of partisan strategy. I mean, it is hard to imagine a worse candidate for them to put forward, a candidate with more vulnerabilities than Donald Trump. The fact that the Republican Party itself is unwilling to just say he is out of bounds, he is too toxic, and he will not be out standard bearer…”
Allen points out:
“You hear what he’s saying there right? He wants to choose our candidate…in his opinion he cannot comprehend how the American people, the Republican voter has not ditched Trump. They do not want to face Trump in 2024 because why? Because they stole 2020 and they’re worried about 2024 again.”
Allen goes on to explain how the latest Democrat Party meltdown over the Supreme Court taking up the Trump immunity appeal proves his point beyond doubt.
“The Hill, Fortune Magazine, Axios, NBC, they all had these polls that got them giddy with excitement…for example an NBC news poll recently it showed that former President Donald Trump uh leading current President Joe Biden by 5 points among registered voters, well, when the surveys final question re-asks voters what their ballot choice would be if Trump is found guilty and convicted of a felony this year Biden narrowly pulls ahead of Trump.”
“So they were banking on what?” Patriot TV host Allen asks.
“Getting a conviction of Trump because they believe, because their pollsters told them that one of their paths to victory was dependent, perhaps their only path to victory apart from cheating…their success in 2024 was heavily dependent upon getting a conviction.
And so with the Supreme Court coming in and basically ensuring that no conviction was going to happen before November they’re losing their minds because why? They stole 2020 and they don’t believe they can beat Trump in 2024. See it’s making so much sense now right?”
The Drew Allen Show is the most exciting new addition to Patriot TV and a new episode will air each Saturday. Allen is also the author of America’s Last Stand: Will You Vote to Save or Destroy America in 2024?, a new book lauded as a sequel to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense.
Watch the episode here.
Interview with Lt. Col. Allen West [1:06:16] JOHN LEAKE
The fearless conservative runs for the Dallas County GOP Chair
MAR 5, 2024 – I just had a fascinating conversation with the decorated soldier and former U.S. Congressman, Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, who is running for the Dallas County GOP Chair. Like Thomas Sowell, West is an eloquent advocate of Equality of Opportunity, and NOT Equality of Outcome. He is a staunch defender of the U.S. Constitution and he believes that its limitation of state power is the foundation of our freedom and prosperity. He advocates the primacy of the individual over collectivist schemes and identity politics. He perceives America’s current obsession with race as the product of subversive actors who wish to weaken the country by sowing discord and hatred.
If you are a resident of Dallas County, I strongly encourage you to vote for this great patriot who has always endeavored to ascertain and tell the truth as best as he can, even though it has repeatedly brought him into conflict with powerful interests. He is precisely the sort of defender of truth and justice that I aspired to interview when we founded the Courageous Discourse Substack.
The Illusion of a Palestinian ‘Demilitarized’ State by Bassam Tawil
March 5, 2024 at 5:00 am
- [A]ny commitment to a demilitarized state by the Palestinian leadership would be legally worthless.
- “Any treaty is void if, at the time it was entered into, it conflicts with a ‘peremptory’ rule of general international law (jus cogens) – a rule accepted and recognized by the international community of states as one from which ‘no derogation is permitted.’ Because the right of sovereign States to maintain military forces essential to ‘self-defense’ is such a peremptory rule, Palestine, depending upon its particular form of authority, could be entirely within its right to abrogate any pre-independence agreement that had compelled its demilitarization.” [Italics in original.] — Louis René Beres, professor emeritus at Purdue University, and an expert in international law and political science, jurist.org, December 23, 2023.
- “Therein lies the jurisprudential core of the Palestinian demilitarization problem: International law would not necessarily require Palestinian compliance with any pre-state agreements concerning the use of armed force. From the standpoint of such authoritative law, enforcing demilitarization upon a sovereign state of Palestine would be sorely problematic.” [Italics in original.] — Louis René Beres, jurist.org, December 23, 2023
- “Unhidden, both the Arab world and Iran still have only a ‘One-State Solution’ for the ‘Israel Problem.’ It is a ‘solution’ that eliminates Israel altogether, a physical solution, a ‘Final Solution.’ Even today, official Arab maps of ‘Palestine’ (PNA and Hamas) show the prospective Arab State comprising all of the West Bank (Judea/Samaria), all of Gaza and all of Israel. They knowingly exclude any references to a Jewish population and list ‘holy sites’ of Christians and Muslims only.” — Louis René Beres, jurist.org, December 23, 2023
- No one can stop a future Palestinian state from becoming a lawless and militarized state. Such a state on Israel’s doorstep would pose a direct and grave threat to Israel’s existence and actually facilitate the mission of the Iranian regime and its terror proxies to murder more Jews.
How The Democrats Destroyed the American Legal System By Pamela Geller
March 4, 2024
Victor Davis Hanson performs a postmortem on American jurisprudence.
How To Destroy the American Legal System
By either listening to testimonies or reading transcripts of the various 2024 Trump election-related court cases and testimonies, what we are left with is an epidemic of lies.
Countering Pro-Palestine Propaganda Part 6: Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return by A.J. Caschetta
March 3, 2024 (Investigative Project on Terrorism) – The final entry in IPT’s “Countering Pro-Palestine Propaganda” concerns one of the most enduring and outrageous claims in the anti-Israel toolbox: that “Palestinian refugees” have a right to claim land, houses, and apartments from which their forebears fled during the 1948 War of Independence. In truth, few of them are really refugees, most of them left their homes voluntarily, and no “Palestinian” has a right to claim anything in Israel.
In virtually every other conflict in modern history, when a war ends, refugees are resettled in other countries where they eventually become citizens. But after the 1948 war in which Israel fought off its neighbors and won its independence, the Arabs who were encouraged to leave their homes and join one of the invading armies were not allowed to become citizens of Jordan, Egypt, Syria, or Lebanon. Instead they were forced to live in “camps” – cities really – where they could be used as perpetual bargaining tools against the Jewish state. Declared “refugees,” their status was used to keep alive a war that had ended. The Arabs lost and Israel won.
As Benny Morris put it in 2008, “most of Palestine’s 700,000 ‘refugees’ fled their homes because of the flail of war (and in the expectation that they would shortly return to their homes on the backs of victorious Arab invaders).”
In truth, few of them are really refugees, most of them left their homes voluntarily, and no “Palestinian” has a right to claim anything in Israel.
Among those overconfident Arab leaders was Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Said who promised to “smash the country with our guns and obliterate every place the Jews seek shelter in.”
Syria’s Prime Minister, Hayed al Azm, wrote in his 1973 memoir that “we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave.”
The Arab National Committee in Jerusalem ordered women, children, and the elderly to leave in March 1948.
In August 1948, the commander of Jordan’s Arab Legion said that “Villages were frequently abandoned even before they were threatened by the progress of war.”
After the capture of Haifa, a British police officer wrote that “every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe.”
Arabs, on the other hand, dismantled or destroyed the Jewish towns and villages they conquered in the war, among them, according to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Beit Ha’arava and Kalya north of the Dead Sea; four kibbutzim of the Etzion Bloc, west of Bethlehem; the Jewish Quarter in Hebron; Atarot and Neve Ya’akov, north of Jerusalem; the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem; Tel Or/Naharayim – the hydro-electric power station built by Pinhas Rutenberg by the Jordan River south of Lake Kinneret; and Kfar Darom in the Gaza Strip.”
Since Arabs erroneously assumed that Jews would treat them the way they treated Jews, they fled.
[Ed.: Hanan Ashrawi contrived that reversal (“Right of Return”) for her so-called “Balestinians” directly from Israeli law regarding Jews’ right of return to Israel. She was, in fact, the first female representative of the so-called “Balestinians” who after her American education, promulgated the art of reversalism into the common dialectic.
The former US ambassador to Israel who can’t get basic facts right By Moshe Phillips
February 28, 2024 – Despite having a career dedicated to the Israel-Arab conflict Martin Indyk can’t manage to get even the most basic facts correct.
Martin Indyk has spent his entire professional life immersed in the Arab-Israeli conflict, holding prominent positions in advocacy groups, think tanks, and the State Department. So how is it that he still can’t get the most basic facts about the conflict right?
In the March-April 2024 issue of Foreign Affairs, Indyk makes the case for why it would be great to have a sovereign Palestinian state as soon as possible. Yet again and again throughout the essay, he makes glaring errors in referring to key aspects of the history and nature of the Arab war against Israel.
For someone who served as ambassador to Israel and Assistant Secretary of State (among other positions), Indyk is either surprisingly ignorant or surprisingly careless about his area of presumed expertise. Either possibility is alarming.
Let’s start with Indyk’s “history” of the idea of creating a Palestinian state. He wants to show that the proposal has deep roots. It’s not just something that he and his State Department friends cooked up last week; it has a tradition. Because, presumably, something with a long history is less scary than something which seems new and radical. He writes: “The two-state solution dates back to at least 1937, when a British commission suggested a partition of the British mandate territory…”
Indyk is off by fifteen years. The two-state solution began in 1922, not 1937. And what happened in 1922 was not just some British proposal—the British actually implemented it. They physically partitioned the Palestine Mandate territory, giving the 78% east of the Jordan River to the Arabs, leaving only 22% on the western side for the Jews.
The serial killer who might be the first president of Palestine MOSHE PHILLIPS
Marwan Barghouti is serving five consecutive sentences of life imprisonment.
Georgios Tsibouktzakis was born and raised in the picturesque northern Greek town of Evosmos, a name that means “pleasant scent.” Among its notable sites is the Agios Athanasios Church, which is more than 200 years old.
The Tsibouktzakis family must have been impoverished because upon completing primary school, at age 12, Georgios set aside his studies and found a job in a local fabric factory.
At some point, young Georgios experienced a religious awakening. He adopted an extremely humble lifestyle, giving away his belongings, including his most precious possession—his bicycle—and entering a Greek Orthodox religious order.
After studying at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Georgios decided to go to Israel. And why not? Christianity was born in the Land of Israel. The Christian Bible is filled with references to Judea (although there is no mention of “Palestine,” for some reason). As a devout man of faith, he wanted to spend the rest of his life in the Holy Land.
In 1990, Georgios arrived in Israel and resumed his religious studies at a local Greek Orthodox seminary. After three years, he became a monk and was given the name Father Germanos. Eventually, he was ordained a priest and deacon. He was assigned to live at St. George’s Monastery.
A word about St. George’s. Despite the frequent lies by Arab propagandists and their supporters about Israel supposedly mistreating Christians, in fact, the country is home to numerous monasteries such as St. George’s, which all operate as freely as any Jewish religious institution. St. George’s is located on a prime piece of real estate just 12 miles outside of Jerusalem.
ICC Language Indicates Bias against Israel By Moshe Phillips
March 3, 2024 – PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (JNS) — The International Criminal Court is examining Israel’s policies in what it calls the “occupied Palestinian West Bank.” But how can the court possibly render a fair verdict when that very term is a complete and utter falsehood?
For as long as any of us can remember, the phrase “occupied Palestinian West Bank” has been a regular part of the vocabulary used by the media, as well as the political and diplomatic world. The fact that those words have been around for a long time doesn’t make them true.
Contemporary American English includes all sorts of names and phrases that don’t mean what they actually suggest. “French fries” are not French. “Koala bears” are not bears. “Driveways” are for parking, not driving—and parkways are the opposite. That’s all great fodder for stand-up comedians who specialize in observational humor.
But the way the terms “occupation,” “Palestinian” and “West Bank” are used is no joking matter.
“Occupation” was accurate for a short period of time. But Israel’s “occupation” of the territories in question ended long ago.
The Israelis first occupied those areas in self-defense during the Six-Day War in June 1967. Between 1993 and 1995, however, that occupation came to an end. It was replaced by an agreed-upon division of the region between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The Israelis withdrew from the parts where 98% of the Palestinian Arabs reside. There are no Israeli troops, no Israeli administration and no Israeli military governor there anymore. So who exactly is “occupying” it? The Palestinian Authority, of course.
The P.A. has its own armed troops (euphemistically called “security forces”), its own administration and its own governors. It runs the courts, the police, the schools, the news media and everything else that constitutes an occupation.
The only part of the area that Israel occupies is where Israelis reside. And that Israeli presence is stipulated by the Oslo Accords. Not that Israel’s right to the area is based on the Oslo agreement, of course. It’s based on 3,000-plus years of continuous Jewish inhabitation and many centuries of Jewish national sovereignty—not to mention international law and the Hebrew Bible. But the fact is that the P.A. agreed to it.
“Palestinian” is not an authentic term either, which is to say that when the Romans coined that term in ancient times, that did not automatically confer “Palestinian” ethnicity upon the people who were living there. Of course, in principle, new nationalities can be invented, as some of the Arabs living in that region eventually did.
[Ed.:
Democratic rhetoric takes a perilous turn for the Jews Caroline B. Glick
Democratic movers and shakers are grafting antisemitism onto the party’s DNA. Op-ed.
Mar 3, 2024, 11:01 PM (GMT+2) – ( JNS) In an appearance this week on MSNBC, veteran Democratic political strategist James Carville made a stunning statement. Speaking of the uncommitted vote in Michigan, Carville said that it will be Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s fault if Biden loses the election in November.
“There is a problem all across the country [with Democratic voters who will punish Biden if he continues to support Israel] and I hope that the President and [Secretary of State Antony] Blinken can get this thing calmed down, because if it don’t [sic.] get calmed down before the Democratic convention in Chicago it’s going to be a very ugly time in Chicago. I promise you that. They’re gonna have to tell Bibi Netanyahu, ‘Hey dude, we’re not gonna lose our election because you’re scared to go to jail.”
Carville’s bit about jail was part of a larger conspiracy theory that he has been peddling since shortly after the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab invasion of southern Israel on Oct. 7. That theory has it that Netanyahu only decided to wage a war to eradicate Hamas in order to deflect public attention from his criminal trial. Beyond the obscenity of the contention itself, the fact is that since Netanyahu’s trial opened two years ago, the prosecution’s entire case has fallen apart. But the new wrinkle that Carville incorporated is that it will be Israel’s fault if Biden loses.
Carville is far from alone in making this claim. Pro-Hamas Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) is one of its most outspoken champions. Ahead of the Michigan primary last Tuesday, Tlaib led a campaign of pro-Hamas Muslims and progressives to convince like-minded Michiganders to vote “Uncommitted” to show their opposition to what they perceive as Biden’s support for Israel in its war against Hamas.
Hamas won the UK elections Giulio Meotti
Delightful multiculturalism! Note the the mayors of Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Oldham and Rockdale.
Mar 4, 2024, 5:01 PM (GMT+2)- “From the river to the sea,” roared Scotsman George “Gaza” Galloway, Saddam Hussein’s friend who swam with Fidel Castro, who doesn’t mind wearing designer clothes while leading his followers like an Islamic cleric.
“This is for Gaza”, Galloway said. The left-wing populist blowhard took away Labour’s two decades of dominance in Rochdale, the former Manchester-area textile town scene of the infamous child abuse scandal, in which Pakistani immigrants committed horrific sex crimes against teenage girls working class white women for many years.
Labour’s candidate, Azhar Ali, told a party meeting that Israel had “allowed” the October 7 Hamas massacre to take place, to give it the “green light” to invade Gaza.
-In recent days, the Conservatives ousted the Tory vice-president who had accused the mayor of London of being “controlled by Islamists”.
-Meanwhile, a conservative minister has resigned because he says he doesn’t want to end up killed by Islamic extremists who killed a colleague.
-The former prime minister, Liz Truss, just said at a conference in America that she fears Islamic parties will take power in various cities.
-The issue is also raised by former Home Secretary Suella Braverman (forced to resign because she wanted a crackdown on immigration) in her article in the Telegraph, in which she states: “This is no longer the great country I knew. Islamists are forcing Britain to submit.”
Meanwhile, “no white theaters” are arriving in London this week: theatrical performances where only black and colored spectators will be admitted to the city. As the producers explained, the goal is to create “an environment where an all-Black audience can experience and discuss an event free from the white gaze.”
Damn you, Mr. Churchill!
All this happens because Europe doesn’t count the immigration’s percentages. Rochdale today has a 30 per cent Islamic population. This is certified not by some conspiracy site, but by the New York Times. The city has already had an Islamic mayor.
Like the mayors of Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Oldham and Rockdale.
Delightful multiculturalism!
70 Years in the Making, The Marxist Takeover of America is Falling Apart (Video 30:19) By Grant Stinchfield
Mar. 4, 2024 11:00 am – The Marxists have been trying to take down America for over 70 years now. It is clear to me they underestimated us. The war against freedom is now at a crossroads. When the anti-freedom communists lose their battle to stop Donald Trump, it may just be the final nail in their coffin.
America is not what it once was, but it is still the greatest, most powerful nation in the world. Let me remind you, our power does not come from our leaders. It comes from the people.
And the people are waking up. Former Soviet Union, KGB agent, Yuri Bezmanov talked about the communist battle to steal American minds. His words still ring true today. Except the timeline. The communists expected victory long ago. They have made strides, but they have not won. What these Marxists and Leninists hoped for, has not worked out. Their victory against us is taking much longer than they ever expected.
This podcast is about why I have faith in America and the American people to fight back and win.
[Ed.: I strongly hope that Grant Stinchfield is right, and that I am completely wrong.]
Countering Pro-Palestine Propaganda Part 6: Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return by A.J. Caschetta
March 3, 2024 – In virtually every other conflict in modern history, when a war ends, refugees are resettled in other countries where they eventually become citizens. But after the 1948 war in which Israel fought off its neighbors and won its independence, the Arabs who were encouraged to leave their homes and join one of the invading armies were not allowed to become citizens of Jordan, Egypt, Syria, or Lebanon. Instead they were forced to live in “camps” – cities really – where they could be used as perpetual bargaining tools against the Jewish state. Declared “refugees,” their status was used to keep alive a war that had ended. The Arabs lost and Israel won.
As Benny Morris put it in 2008, “most of Palestine’s 700,000 ‘refugees’ fled their homes because of the flail of war (and in the expectation that they would shortly return to their homes on the backs of victorious Arab invaders).”
Among those overconfident Arab leaders was Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Said who promised to “smash the country with our guns and obliterate every place the Jews seek shelter in.”
Syria’s Prime Minister, Hayed al Azm, wrote in his 1973 memoir that “we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave.”
The Arab National Committee in Jerusalem ordered women, children, and the elderly to leave in March 1948.
In August 1948, the commander of Jordan’s Arab Legion said that “Villages were frequently abandoned even before they were threatened by the progress of war.”
After the capture of Haifa, a British police officer wrote that “every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe.”
Arabs, on the other hand, dismantled or destroyed the Jewish towns and villages they conquered in the war, among them, according to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Beit Ha’arava and Kalya north of the Dead Sea; four kibbutzim of the Etzion Bloc, west of Bethlehem; the Jewish Quarter in Hebron; Atarot and Neve Ya’akov, north of Jerusalem; the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem; Tel Or/Naharayim – the hydro-electric power station built by Pinhas Rutenberg by the Jordan River south of Lake Kinneret; and Kfar Darom in the Gaza Strip.”
Since Arabs erroneously assumed that Jews would treat them the way they treated Jews, they fled.
Escalation Towards an Independent Terrorist State by Nils A. Haug
March 3, 2024 at 5:00 am
- Both US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron reveal their simplistic, and somewhat imperialist, Western approach to a complex Middle Eastern situation, irrespective of the aims and intentions of the two parties chiefly involved: the radical Islamists of Gaza and the West Bank, and the State of Israel itself.
- “They [Hamas] told us in all of their statements that their charter is to destroy Israel and exterminate the Jews. Other countries have said the same thing. It’s also in the Houthis’ charter. It’s in Iran’s direct messaging. I think that when they tell you they want to kill you, you should believe that. I think that’s the lesson.” — Safra Catz, CEO of Oracle, ynetnews.com, February 24, 2024.
- Realistically, the Palestinian claim to Gaza is based on tenuous grounds. Gaza is not the traditional homeland of the so-called Palestinian people. They are simply a collection of nomadic Arabs who forged that identity for political expediency. This arrangement was openly stated by the late PLO executive committee member, Zoheir Moshen, in an interview with James Dorsey for the Dutch newspaper Trouw, on March 31, 1977: “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak about the existence of a Palestinian people since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
- Even if a political compromise were reached over Gaza, or, the “1949 Armistice Line” as in the revised 2017 Hamas charter, the violent struggle for control over the rest of Israel, particularly the West Bank — the “heart” of Israel — will persist.
How the Biden Administration Quietly Punishes Israel Shoshana Bryen
March 1, 2024 – Unable to persuade Israel to subordinate its national security policy to the dictates of the U.S. government and its allies in the European Union, Qatar and the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, the Biden administration has initiated sanctions and pressures of varying sorts against Israel and Israeli entities. Each has the potential for escalation, and each should be seen as an opening gambit.
The most recent move is an American investigation of the Israeli company Finkelstein Metals, accusing it of receiving what the U.S. considers illegal subsidies from the Israeli government because it is in a government development zone. What is Finkelstein Metals, and why is it important?
It is, according to The Jerusalem Post, the only Israeli company that produces brass, bronze, and copper alloy products, and it is the sole supplier of metal bars for the producing ammunition for Iron Dome. Ron Tomer, president of the Manufacturers’ Association of Israel, warned: “This is an unfounded lawsuit, which may lead to the closure of the factory. If this case is successful, it may harm other Israeli companies and is contrary to existing trade agreements.”
It is the potential for escalation that counts.
But this could also affect U.S. defense programming. “Existing trade agreements” cover a number of key Israeli systems in the U.S. military, including Trophy reactive armor, which protects American tanks for the Army and Marine Corps; and the Iron Fist protective system on Bradley Fighting Vehicles. Major Israeli subsectors for defense include parts for aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles, air-control technology, electronic components for land, air and sea platforms, airborne and ground-based engines, electromechanical devices, microwave components, and sensors.
Israeli capabilities crisscross the American defense sector to the benefit of both countries.
Jonathan Pollard and Rabbi David Bar-Hayim: Different Types of Jews [18:57] Machon Shilo
Discussion between former Prisoner of Zion, Jonathan Pollard and the head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim
Why the World Cares About Gaza and Not About Africa – Charles Jacobs & Ben Poser | Top Story [53:19] JNS TV
Feb 1, 2024 – Many are not aware, but slavery and sex trafficking has never ended in Africa. But while the human rights community seems obsessed with “genocide” in Palestine, no one really pays attention to the massive human rights violations happening to black people in Africa. Why are human rights groups so selective? Why does the media gravitate towards and champion the rights of some while others are ignored?
This week on Top Story, JNS Editor-in-chief Jonathan Tobin speaks with the co-founder of Americans for Peace and Tolerance Charles Jacobs and executive director of the American Anti-Slavery Group Ben Poser, both of whom are involved in raising awareness of African slaves and freeing them in some cases.
CHAPTER 8: Constructivism Impedes Reality-Testing by Linda Goudsmit
Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier—Reality Is [upcoming release April 2024]
March 3, 2024 – Constructivism is a learning theory that has its beginnings in the educational philosophy of John Dewey (1859–1952) and the work of Swiss developmental psychologist Jean Piaget (1896–1980) and Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934).
Piaget believed that human beings pass through four stages of cognitive development based on our brain’s growing ability to think in new ways. His theory of cognitive development focuses on childhood and education. In Piaget’s view the learner is a unique individual, whose childhood interactions and explorations influence his development. Piaget believed that children act on their environment to learn, and that the function of social interaction is to move the child away from the self-absorption of early childhood. Piaget saw childhood development in universal human terms.
Lev Vygotsky, on the other hand, focused on learning as a social process and developed the sociocultural theory of development called Social Constructivism. Vygotsky considered the learner to be a social being, whose development is influenced by environmental factors. He saw childhood development in culturally determined terms, and believed that children interact socially with their environment in order to learn the cultural values of their specific society. Vygotsky believed that behavior cannot be understood outside its cultural setting, and that culture actually shapes cognition.
The divergent perspectives of Piaget and Vygotsky parallel the differences in educational philosophies and pedagogy that we see in traditional education versus today’s politicized education.
‘A Storm Is Coming for The Guilty” Warns Neil Oliver. [18:09] BY PATRICIA HARRITY
MARCH 1, 2024 – “You don’t get to shape the world … to the advantage of a tiny minority, to the detriment of the hundreds of millions,” says Neil Oliver on his YouTube channel. He adds that millions of lives have been “ruined forever” by Big State, Big Pharma, and Big Media. “The last four years have been the “most dangerous and blatant assault on freedom and civil rights in the history of humankind”
Here is an excerpt of Neil Oliver’s thoughts and observations:
“It’s palpable that the anger of citizens is rising. It’s been on a sort of slow simmer for years. It seems to be coming to a boil. The heat has been turned up, or the heat that’s already there is somehow building an intensity.
“You can’t point at any single place on the map, really, and say, here’s the seat of it. The building, anger and frustration and heat and pain is everywhere in the West, certainly. And it’s for all sorts of reasons. There are many symptoms, all coming from the same disease.“By now, we’ve all endured, what is it, three, four years of the most dangerous and blatant assault on freedom and civil rights in the history of humankind.
That’s a fact. And I make no apologies for bringing this up over and over, for worrying at this like a terrier with a rat — because the sustained abuse of our species, inflicted on an unprecedented scale, even after all these years, it remains unaddressed, unconfessed, and without consequences for the guilty — so far.“The guilty have grown sore, have been so confident, blasé, that they don’t even seek any longer to deny the coordinated global collusion of Big State, Big Pharma, Big Media, wholesale collusion that ended completely or ruined forever uncounted millions of lives.
And it is millions of lives across the West, around the world, directly or indirectly, because of policies and practices that have been in place …“You don’t get to shape the world, reshape the world in your own image, to your advantage, to the advantage of a tiny minority, to the detriment of the hundreds of millions, indeed the billions, and then play the victim when someone somewhere says, ‘Enough.’“A person cornered, a person left with nothing, or who feels he has nothing left to lose, is finally free in a fundamental sense, free to act in any way that suits.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a storm coming. And those who bloody-mindedly sowed the seeds of the whirlwind, who reaped the benefits of so doing for so long, are finally, finally feeling the change in the wind.”
You can see the full video [18:10]
Israel BRACES for Ramadan Violence; Iran FUELING Al-Aqsa Tensions [15:17] Yair Pinto
Mar 2, 2024 #israel #israelnews #israelwar
TBN Israel’s Yair Pinto reports that Israeli officials are preparing for the possibility of violence in Jerusalem and the Temple Mount complex during the Ramadan. Additionally, learn how false narratives surrounding the Al-Aqsa mosque are fueling tensions. Please join us in prayer for a peaceful Ramadan in Jerusalem, Israel, and throughout the world. Stay up-to-date with the latest developments here on TBN Israel.
Israel BRACES for Ramadan Violence; Iran FUELING Al-Aqsa Tensions [15:17] Yair Pinto
Mar 2, 2024 #israel #israelnews #israelwar – TBN Israel’s Yair Pinto reports that Israeli officials are preparing for the possibility of violence in Jerusalem and the Temple Mount complex during the Ramadan. Additionally, learn how false narratives surrounding the Al-Aqsa mosque are fueling tensions. Please join us in prayer for a peaceful Ramadan in Jerusalem, Israel, and throughout the world. Stay up-to-date with the latest developments here on TBN Israel.
Jonathan Pollard: Benjamin Netanyahu Never Pulls the Trigger [17:44] Machon Shilo
Mar 1, 2024 – Discussion between former Prisoner of Zion, Jonathan Pollard and the head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim
What Peter Zeihan isn’t telling you about Israel and Russia Fall Out [11:12] The Tom Nash Report
Mar 1, 2024 – Here is the link to Peter Zeihan’s excellent video on this subject:
The Communist Revolution is here. Now what? TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
MAR 1, 2024 – I was struggling to decide what the next topic should be for my newsletter – and then this happened. Emerald Robinson posted this warning on Twitter (X):
EMERALD ROBINSON: “Allow me to make a prediction: the Biden regime is not going to give up power in 2024. This will shock a majority of Americans who still live mentally in a free country that exists only in their memory now. You should spend the next 8 months preparing for the end of America.”
Many people did not like Emerald’s prediction. Several people angrily replied to her post…
CHINOIR: “Shut up with this doom porn. We’re going to win, and save America.”
SCHWEIKERT: “I predict the opposite. Trump will win. Anyone remember when they said *Clinton won’t leave office? *Obama won’t leave office? *Trump won’t leave office? They always did. They always will.”
TRITE: “This isn’t helpful, Emerald. Time to put on your big boy pants and fight back. They have always been this corrupt. Trump just brought it all into the light so we can do something about it. Don’t become a black pill. We are winning this war. Don’t let people tell you any different.”
TATUM: “No, Emerald. You are awesome but this is negative. America is Americans. Armed Americans. Lots of them. With Constitutional rights.”
Z: “You are either part of the problem or part of the solution. Only complaining about it makes you part of the problem.”
But, IMHO, the most important response to Emerald’s doom & gloom prediction came from Xi Van Fleet – a woman who survived Communism in Mao’s China and is here to tell us to stand up against the same thing happening in America!
XI VAN FLEET: “No Emerald, we don’t need your predictions. We need ACTION. Understand. Get organized. Fight back. We need courage when we fight for our own survival! Fight as if your life depends on it, because it does!!!!”
Many do not know that the CPUSA (Communist Party USA) was founded two years after the success of the Russian Revolution in the Soviet Union and two years before the founding of the Chinese Communist Party. Communism has been here in America for over 100 years and now they have come out in the open. Why now? After 100 years of cultivation and indoctrination, they believe it is their time to take over America!
Xi Van Fleet just gave an interview to Tucker about the details of the Communist cultural revolution she sees in America because she lived it herself in Communist China. I listened to it all and I think you should too. I’ve heard her speak before but she made some new important points and has a new book out. Here’s a transcript.
Daily Shmutz | COMMENTARY / OPINION | 3/5/24