COMMENTARY / OPINION
Trump’s foreign policy moves starting to look like that of a desperate, dying empire LEO HOHMANN
Gerald Celente, the legendary chief editor of the Trends Journal, once said: ‘When all else fails they take you to war.’
APR 01, 2025
The United States of America elected Donald Trump in a landslide victory over a hapless opponent last November, and immediately the mantra “We’re Back” started reverberating across the land.
People were jubilant.
Some held family or neighborhood “victory parties.”
You could hardly blame them after four years of the most absent, most inept president in U.S. history.
Donald Trump, never one to be bashful or to wince before the spotlight, fanned the flames. He immediately started talking about “the dawn of a new Golden Age of America.”
He started off with a bang, publicly signing executive order after executive order. His fans swooned.
But going on three months in, reality is starting to take hold.
What we are seeing is that roughly half of his most meaningful executive orders have been overturned or at least delayed by the courts.
We’ve seen no meaningful action from the Republican-held Congress to codify any of the Trump agenda.
In another six months the campaigning for the 2026 midterms will be in high gear and we will all wonder what of any lasting value we have to show for all the fanfare. Remember, Trump’s executive orders, even the ones that get by the courts, can be overturned on DAY ONE of the next presidency.
The question is this: Will Trump himself get frustrated and seek to distract the nation from his lack of progress on his domestic agenda by taking the nation to war overseas?
This past weekend, Trump started showing signs of frustration.
His long-touted peace deal with Russia’s Putin and Ukraine’s Zelensky is going nowhere. Neither side seems to want to stop fighting, and Trump is learning that you can’t just beat your chest as the “King” of America and browbeat foreign dictators into accepting your “deal.”
When Trump gets frustrated, he takes to social media. And sometimes he even dials up the corporate media to vent his frustrations there. On Sunday, he called NBC News and spoke with Christine Welker. He told her he was “angry” and “pissed off” with Russia’s Vladimir Putin for not agreeing to his peace deal with Ukraine. He also felt the need to repeat his previously mentioned desire for a “third term.”
Then, after saying he would slap Russia with secondary tariffs on all Russian oil if Putin didn’t come to his senses and agree to see the world (including his own border area) through Trump’s America-centric lens, he moved on to talking about Iran.
Trump said he would carpet-bomb Iran and bring hellfire and brimstone, “the likes of which they’ve never seen before,” if they didn’t agree to his deal to give up their nuclear program. Iran gave no indication that it would comply with his demands and on Monday we read that Iran was loading its missiles and priming them for take-off.
Americans did not vote for another Mideast war. That is probably the last thing America can afford right now. And the last thing it needs. Trump said it himself. He said he wanted to be the “Peace President.”
If you recall, the rationale used to avoid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was that it would only serve to give Hamas time to rearm and regroup. Israel had Hamas on the ropes and needed to finish them off, we were told.
It’s interesting that this rationale does not apply to the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump’s push for a 30-day ceasefire makes no sense from the Russian perspective. Putin says forget the 30-day temporary truce. He wants to address the core causes of the war and negotiate a truly “lasting peace.”
And yet, here we go. Trump’s foreign policy seems geared along the lines of, make peace with me or I will bomb the hell out of you. Or at the very least, I will wage economic war on you until you succumb to my wishes.
Sorry, Donald, but this isn’t the art of the deal. You can’t browbeat the world into submission.
Perhaps Trump has a secret deal with Putin whereby he criticizes Putin in public while telling him in private he won’t interfere with Russia’s drive to finish off Ukraine. But if that were the case, why is Trump continuing to fund Ukraine’s war effort? He restarted the funding about two weeks after cutting it off, a fact most Americans I talk to are still not aware of.
And even if there is a secret deal, I still don’t think it’s helpful in the long run for a world leader to use subterfuge to the extent that no country can take him at his word. That can only end badly when the deceptions and misdirections finally get exposed. Now you are exposed as a paper tiger who got called on the bluff.
The fact that any U.S. president would make such statements only shows signs of desperation and, in my opinion, weakness. It smacks of the playground bully, who always threatens more than he can deliver. He begs for attention with bombastic statements and basks for a time in the façade of the tough guy image, until someone takes him up on his challenge, calls his bluff and delivers an unexpected crushing blow.
Trump’s new foreign policy tactic is begging for someone, some country, to step up and put down the bully, hit him right at his weakest point. Which is often the most obvious place. Right in the center of his face! Perhaps his exposed jugular? Perhaps a gut punch that incapacitates him just long enough to then deliver the crushing blow? Maybe an EMP attack followed by a strike of an overwhelming hypersonic nature?
Trump wants Western peacekeepers in Ukraine. That is a major snag for Putin, mostly because of Russia’s history and distrust of Western countries like France and Britain (both have fought wars with Russia in the past). Putin’s idea of having the United Nations place peacekeepers in Ukraine is also stupid. How did that work out in Rwanda?
The only way to solve the problem is to back away and let Russia and Ukraine fight it out. That will provide the only organic environment for a lasting peace, and even that may not last forever. But Russia is oh so close to achieving that goal, and that’s why Putin doesn’t want any part of Trump’s “peace” deal. He believes he can end the war by finishing off his opponent and then accomplish all of his goals, rather than 50 or 75 percent of them. Why would the victor in a war settle on the terms of the loser? This is essentially what Trump is asking Putin to do. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. Ukraine’s leader, Zelensky, wants to keep fighting, so let him carry on and see how that works out for him.
Sadly, it’s becoming clear that the U.S. is losing influence in the world. Its dollar is faltering. Its economy is teetering. And its leaders are behaving like those running a dying empire. The U.S. has to stop acting like the biggest, baddest bully on the block, when everyone knows it has a soft underbelly.
Because remember: When all else fails, they take you to war.
Jonathan Pollard: Trump Action Against Israel Left? [29:27]
April 1, 2025 Machon Shilo – Discussion between the head of Machon Shilo Rabbi David Bar-Hayim & Jewish hero Jonathan Pollard
Does the US Government Have the Right to Condition Funding to Universities? by Alan M. Dershowitz
April 1, 2025
- Many left-wing university faculty members… are making the absolutist claim that it is always a denial of academic freedom for governments to pressure universities with a cut-off of funding.
- It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to hypothesize the following variation on the current situation: it’s the 1950s and 1960s in the Deep South; a formerly segregated university is allowing masked KKK racists to harass Black students, blocking some from attending classes; buildings are occupied by Klansmen demanding a return to segregation; the university is doing nothing to protect the Black students, citing academic freedom and freedom of speech.
- None of these purported factual distinctions justifies the allegedly principled opposition to the Trump administration’s employment of pressure to stop anti-Jewish discrimination at Columbia from those who would praise the employment of similar pressure to prevent discrimination against Blacks, gays or other groups favored by intersectionality. It is double standard bigotry against Jews, plain and simple.
- The pressure on Columbia may produce positive results — if it keeps its promises — including more academic freedom and free speech for students who were victimized by Columbia’s inaction until it was pressured to act by the threat of defunding. That would be a good thing, just as federal pressure on some southern universities that reduced discrimination against Blacks in the 1950s and 1960s was a good thing.
Many left-wing university faculty members (a redundancy if there ever was one) are rebelling against the Trump administration’s threat to cut federal funding to universities that tolerate antisemitic actions against their Jewish students. They condemned the acting president of Columbia for accepting some of the administration’s conditions for restoring the $400 million that it threatened to cut, and she was forced to resign.
The faculty members are making the absolutist claim that it is always a denial of academic freedom for governments to pressure universities with a cut-off of funding. In making this broad claim, they ignore the lessons of history and the single standard of morality.
It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to hypothesize the following variation on the current situation: it’s the 1950s and 1960s in the Deep South; a formerly segregated university is allowing masked KKK racists to harass Black students, blocking some from attending classes; buildings are occupied by Klansmen demanding a return to segregation; the university is doing nothing to protect the Black students, citing academic freedom and freedom of speech.
The federal government threatens to cut off federal funding unless the university protects the Black students and bans the use of face masks for the purpose of concealing identity. The university reluctantly complies, out of fear of being defunded.
Liberals and civil rights advocates would applaud the threats of the federal government and the compliance by the university. Many did so in the 1950s and 1960s.
But now that similar threats and actions have been taken to protect Jewish students from masked Hamas supporters at Columbia University, many liberals and civil rights advocates are complaining about the government’s threats and Columbia’s submission, alleging interference with academic freedom. Why the difference?
There are three possible distinctions, none of which justifies — though they explain — why these left-wing groups respond in such a diametrically opposite manner to such similar actions.
The first is that the southern example involved the protection of Blacks, whereas the Columbia situation involves the protection of Jews. Pursuant to the bigoted dogma of “intersectionality,” Jews are deemed the privileged oppressors and Blacks the unprivileged oppressed. So the distinction is seen to be justified. No rational person would accept that reasoning, but many radical students and faculty do.
A related distinction is that the southern protesters and blockers were the evil Klan, whereas the Columbia protesters and blockaders paint themselves as virtuous pro-Palestinians. This distinction too is seen as justified by intersectionalists, who deem all supporters of Palestinianism as oppressed and all supporters of Israel as oppressors. This racist distinction as well is accepted by many students and faculty.
Finally, there is the distinction between the government officials who threatened the southern universities in the 1950s and 1960s and the current government officials who threatened Columbia. The current government, which is presided over by President Donald J. Trump, can do no right, according to liberals and civil rights advocates, even if its actions are logically indistinguishable from past approved actions. This variation on the classic ad hominem fallacy is widely accepted in academic and left-wing circles, when the hominem is Trump.
None of these purported factual distinctions justifies the allegedly principled opposition to the Trump administration’s employment of pressure to stop anti-Jewish discrimination at Columbia from those who would praise the employment of similar pressure to prevent discrimination against Blacks, gays or other groups favored by intersectionality. It is double standard bigotry against Jews, plain and simple.
There does need to be limitations on what the federal government should be trying to influence on university campuses. Legitimate academic freedom should be respected. The federal government should be careful about intruding on the content of courses, the hiring of faculty, the admission of students and other primarily academic matters. But even with regard to such academic matters, there are appropriate limits to academic freedom by universities seeking federal funding.
The government is entirely within its rights and power to condition what it provides in discretionary taxpayer funding so that those funds will not be used for propaganda or partisan political purposes, rather than for legitimate educational enterprises. This is a delicate area, since there is no clearly objective way to draw a sharp line between politically neutral education and partisan propaganda. But as the late Justice Potter Stewart once put in the equally nuanced effort to distinguish hard-core pornography from constitutionally protected speech:
“I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [hard-core pornography]…. But I know it when I see it…”
The same is true of partisan propaganda: we know it when we see it— at least in its most extreme form, which is all too common in today’s classrooms and curricula.
The bottom line is that there is a legitimate and constitutionally appropriate place for some federal financial pressure to be directed at some universities to achieve some beneficent purposes. But the government should be cautious, selective and targeted in its deployment. It should operate with a scalpel, rather than a chainsaw, and it should be careful to avoid cutting off financial aid to medical, scientific and other important research and educational enterprises. This is a difficult task but it is a mistake to argue — as many on the left hypocritically do in the current context — that all threats to cut funding from all universities for all purposes is categorically wrong.
The pressure on Columbia may produce positive results — if it keeps its promises — including more academic freedom and free speech for students who were victimized by Columbia’s inaction until it was pressured to act by the threat of defunding. That would be a good thing, just as federal pressure on some southern universities that reduced discrimination against Blacks in the 1950s and 1960s was a good thing.
Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus at Harvard Law School, and the author most recently of War Against the Jews: How to End Hamas Barbarism, and Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law. He is the Jack Roth Charitable Foundation Fellow at Gatestone Institute, and is also the host of “The Dershow” podcast.
Methinks the left doth protest too much Ruthie Blum
A U.S. probe of the money trail to the Israeli machine operating to topple Benjamin Netanyahu should cause the movement’s radical engineers to shake in their Birkenstocks.
March 31, 2025 JNS – In a letter obtained last week by Israel Insider, Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Brian Mast (R-Fla.)—the chairs of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees, respectively—requested of the Jewish Communal Fund, Middle East Dialogue Network, Movement for Quality Government in Israel, PEF Israel Endowment Funds, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, and Blue and White Future that they “produce all documents and information” about dubious practices vis-à-vis Israel.
The March 26 missive to the heads of the above organizations got right to the point in the first paragraph.
“According to reports, the Biden-Harris administration funneled U.S. taxpayer money to certain Israeli entities with the effect of attempting to undermine Israel’s democratically elected government,” it began, with a footnote referencing two JNS articles—one by Caroline Glick and the other by David Isaac.
The former, published Feb. 17, 2023, showed that the left-wing Israeli NGO, the Movement for Quality Government (MQG), had been receiving money from the U.S. State Department. And it was using the cash, among other things, for “democracy education” in Israeli high schools.
As Glick noted, “Since MQG’s primary activity is subverting democracy in Israel by waging lawfare and sowing chaos in a bid to block democratically elected right-wing governments from fulfilling their pledges to voters, it’s fairly clear that when MQG refers to ‘democracy education,’ it doesn’t mean majority rule.”
Isaac’s piece, which appeared on Feb. 18 this year, showed how Elon Musk’s efforts to “expose waste and misuse of funds” by “America’s administrative state” led to the emergence of reports that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) had been heavily funding the anti-government judicial-reform protests in Israel.
This, explained Isaac, “led Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to … blast what he called the ‘almost inconceivable’ amounts of foreign money that drove the protest movement.”
The letter by Jordan and Mast went on to stress that the “use of federal grants in this manner not only jeopardizes America’s relationship with one of its closest allies, but also undermines core civil liberties protected within the United States and Israel. Additionally, the misuse of federal grant funds may, in some cases, amount to a criminal offense.”
Jordan and Mast then clarified the impetus for their probe.
“In 2023, Israel experienced widespread protests over the government’s plan to reform the country’s judicial system,” they wrote. “The Biden-Harris administration openly opposed the proposed reforms, with President Biden saying that Israel ‘cannot continue down this road.’ Media reports later revealed that these protests were funded in part by U.S. grant money that had been funneled through various American and Israeli NGOs to groups directing the protests.”
They proceeded to specify that, “according to public media reports, in 2023, Blue and White Future, ‘an Israeli NGO that funded and ran the headquarters for the coalition of groups opposing judicial reform,’ received approximately $4 million from a U.S.-based NGO, Middle East Peace Dialogue Network (MEPDN) through the Jewish Communal Fund and Rockefeller Philanthropy Adivsors.”
This, said Jordan and Mast, “was not the first time U.S. taxpayer-funded grants had been used to support protests against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or the policies he supports.”
Unfortunately, they added, “these reports reflect the poor track record of USAID and the State Department in funding entities in the region. USAID and the State Department have even provided direct support to Hamas and other terrorist groups. From 2007 through 2024, USAID and the State Department sent at least $122 million to NGOs aligned with designated terrorist organizations. Many of those NGOs have openly espoused antisemitic rhetoric and encouraged violence against Jewish individuals.”
The letter concluded with a detailed list of the data demanded by Congress, which “has an important interest in ensuring that taxpayer-funded grants are used in a manner that is consistent with statutory authorization and congressional intent.”
An investigation into the money trail from Team Biden to the Israeli machine still operating to topple Netanyahu should cause the movement’s radical engineers to shake in their Birkenstocks. After all, full-page ads in newspapers cost a fortune.
Ditto for highway banners, tents, flags and loudspeaker systems. And let’s not forget the hundreds of Handmaid’s Tale costumes signifying the plight that awaits Israeli women in the event that a modicum of balance is restored to the branches of government.
Having the flow of dollars severed would put a real damper on their ongoing campaign, which has come to include enveloping many of the hostage families with a dangerous bear hug. To make matters worse for the devious NGOs in question, Channel 14‘s Tamir Morag reported on Monday that MQG chairman Eliad Shraga and Blue and White Future CEO Eran Schwartz are expected to be summoned by Congress for questioning.
Schwartz promptly rejected claims that he and his “anybody but Bibi” buddies were abetted in their endeavors by the Biden administration. He’s probably counting on the difficulty that the likes of Jordan and Mast will have in drawing a direct link between the coffers of one “charity” with a political agenda to another.
This is likely the same reason that then-State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel was confident in his own denial about his office’s funding of the Israeli protest movement. In a press briefing on March 27, 2023, he expressed righteous indignation at the very suggestion.
“Any notion that we are propping up or supporting these protests or the initiators of them is completely and demonstrably false,” he said. “The Movement of Quality Government … received a modest grant from the State Department that was initiated during the previous administration, and the latest disbursal of funds came in September of 2022, prior to the most recent Israeli elections. And this grant supported an educational program for Jerusalem schools that supplemented their civic-studies curriculum.”
The timeline is laughable. MQG is but one leftist NGO that’s been staging anti-Netanyahu demonstrations for years. And Shraga appears so often before Israel’s High Court of Justice to represent petitioners against all things Bibi-related that he’s reached the celebrity status of a reality-TV star.
It remains to be seen whether Jordan and Mast will succeed at extinguishing this particular aspect of USAID’s wasteful, often pernicious, activities. But it’s a relief to have the powers-that-be in Washington put a stop to the gaslighting.
Indeed, to borrow from Queen Gertrude in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” the left “doth protest too much, methinks.” Literally and figuratively.
RUTHIE BLUM Ruthie Blum, a former adviser at the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is an award-winning columnist and a senior contributing editor at JNS. Co-host with Ambassador Mark Regev of the JNS-TV podcast “Israel Undiplomatic,” she writes on Israeli politics and U.S.-Israel relations. Originally from New York, she moved to Israel in 1977. She is a regular guest on national and international media outlets, including Fox, Sky News, i24News, Scripps, ILTV, WION and Newsmax.
March 31, 2025 The Shannon Joy Show
WOW. What an amazing day.
We packed almost 500 people from all over the country in the beautiful sanctuary at Bethel Christian Fellowship as a brilliant panel of speakers delivered very hard truths about the state of our nation and the troubled times ahead.
The Livestream delivered almost 60,000 LIVE viewers which will deliver many MILLIONS of post views as it was featured on 13 different channels on platforms like Rumble, X, Facebook, Pickax, Spreely TV, Daily Clout and CHD. HUGE thank to our Stream Master, Aynaz Anni Cyrus.
At times you could hear a pin drop in the massive room as we learned about the totalitarian ideology of Technocracy & transhumanism from Aaron Day and Jeff Dornick, the DOGE Coup and mass data theft from Naomi Wolf and Sasha Latypova explained how behind the entire COVID lockdown was a military deployment and apparatus that still exists today and threatens our people and way of life.
The health panel featured Dr. Pierre Kory who spoke about cutting edge new treatments for healing, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden with the truth about the lack of political will for change, Mary Holland and Warner Mendenhall who confirmed that there is MORE that needs to be done to ban mRNA, stop the shots and hold PHARMA accountable but also gave very hopeful updates about important victories, bills and cases we need to pay attention to and advocate for.
It was a wonderful day …
Mostly it was because of all of you.
All of the smiles, encouragement, hugs and support. A group people who gathered to support a worthy organization pursuing a worthy cause, Americans For Health Care Alternatives under the leadership of the most humble servant leaders Pam & Dan Waterman, Sue Maduro and Lindsey Peeples.
Every person in that room longs for the fragile sanity of the world before COVID, they know we have an even darker path before us and yet they persist. They accept this truth with courage, faith and determination to continue the fight cheerfully yet relentlessly for liberty.
This is what it means to be an American.
This is who we are.
What a beautiful moment.
Thank you.
We recap today.
[Ed.: I watched this live that day, and it was truly amazing.]
Patriots in the belly of the beast– America First against four empires DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
the “Breggin Axiom of Empires”
MAR 25, 2025
Four empires dominate much of the world today, and all empires become ferociously violent at the first whiff of a freedom movement. At this moment in time, America First and its leader, President Donald Trump, threaten the four world empires as never before. Understanding that America’s freedom movement is under assault by four global empires can help us prevail in this Greatest Battle of All Times. We must continue to revive and defend our magnificent role as the world’s first great constitutional republic.
To succeed, we must face the fact that America First, Donald Trump, and all of us who support them are fighting four empires that occupy most of the world and its population. We must also face the fact that all empires are violent beyond our worst imaginings.
Yet, I can find no other analysis comparable to this one concerning our confrontation with these empires. As a result, I am introducing the “Breggin Axiom of Empires” that all empires are inherently evil and are inevitably started and controlled by the worst human beings among us.
In dictionaries and textbooks, empires are typically defined in a neutral, nonjudgemental manner, such as “a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority.”1 They must be the worst humanity has to offer, or they could not build and grow empires. Often, they slaughter their own people, as well as the people they call enemies.
R. J. Rummel was the greatest analyst of how authoritarian and totalitarian regimes inevitably destroy and enslave their own people as well as their enemies.2 He concluded in his book Power Kills:3
There is one solution to each [genocide and mass murder], and the solution in each case is the same. It is to foster democratic freedom and to democratize coercive power and force. That is, mass killing and mass murder carried out by government is a result of indiscriminate, irresponsible Power at the center.
Rummel also summarized, “The bottom line is that it is the power of a regime that accounts for its killing.”
These enormous global predatory monopolies on power are devoted to infinitely expanding their wealth and power — and this is precisely what America First and Donald Trump are facing. That is why it seems like all great powers in the world are fighting against us — it’s because they are!
Why are America First and President Trump such objects of vilification and lethal attack? The answer is that Trump is the ultimate obstacle in the way of the four empires taking over the world. Much as the elite do not want us discussing their actual conspiracies, they do not want us examining their empires, all of which are built upon violent conspiracies. Read any history book, even summaries, about the rise of empires. Empire building is a pyramid of murderous conspiracies among the leaders themselves, even among families and friends, and, of course, against their avowed enemies.
A Warning for All Freedom Fighters
President Trump’s expansionism requires a warning for America First, President Trump, and all of us who believe in freedom and constitutional republics. The possibility of adding Canada and/or Greenland to the United States as a state or territory increases the complexity and unwieldiness of our own very shaky self-government. We are only now passing through the dissolution of the first, and hopefully, last American Global Empire, which began after World War II and, with unusual rapidity, went into decline. It collapsed as empires tend to do ⎯ under the pressure of multiple wars, inflation, a vast bureaucracy, corruption, the redistribution of wealth to predatory oligarchs, and megalomaniacal leadership.
That disastrous experiment with this Global Pax under an American Global Empire so weakened and corrupted us that the freedom movement is now fighting from within the beast — from within the shattered relic of America that resulted from our own failed empire-building.
We need a world of sovereign nations, much as Trump advocates. However, the vastly increasing population and/or mass of the United States raises the dreadful risk of yet another American Global Empire with even dangerously greater power over the world. Increasing the power of the President as chief executive, although Trump may do it responsibly, may also empower a future strongman takeover.
All four empires have nuclear weapons, including the Muslim Califate’s Pakistan, with Iran not far behind. The possession of weapons of mass destruction by all four empires is a major reason none of the empires has thus far openly tried to destroy the others in a full-scale war.
With this knowledge of the four opposing empires, much of the chaos, craziness, and outright savagery in the world today becomes a recognizable historical pattern that has been repeated over and over again since the dawn of civilization with its kingdoms and empires. Today’s empires relentlessly push us toward globalization and a totalitarian world governance; it’s what America First and President Trump and all freedom fighters are up against.
March 29, 2025 Brannon Howse Live
Dr. Peter Breggin appeared on Brannon Howse Live, March 27, 2025, commenting on the multiple manic meltdowns in airports and on airplanes that are being documented and posted on social media. Beyond the apparent click bait, these events are a harbinger of serious issues. Brannon Howse and Dr. Breggin also discussed globalism and the activities of world empires jockeying for position and control in today’s world.8 March, 2025
Do Not Be Fooled by the ‘Anti-Hamas’ Protests by Bassam Tawil
March 31, 2025 at 5:00 am
- Those who are rushing to celebrate the protests in Gaza need to consider that they are most likely nothing but a show by the Iran-backed Hamas to fool the world into thinking that there is an uprising against the terrorist group.
- After all, this is the same Hamas that kept signaling to everyone, years before its terrorists attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, that it was not interested in another round of fighting. Then it murdered and brutally tortured 1,200 Israelis and kidnapped 251.
- What would Norway or Denmark do if ISIS or Al-Qaeda were on its border, seeking to destroy it?
- According to some reports, Hamas members have been spotted leading some of Gaza’s demonstrations.
- Last year, Israel tried to encourage anti-Hamas clans to play a role in managing the Gaza Strip — without success. Regrettably, several clans have, over the past year, issued statements expressing support for Hamas as the “sole representative of the Gaza Strip.”
- The current protests are taking place for one reason only: Hamas is conspicuously losing the war… The protesters are just angry that Israel retaliated so hard.
- All Hamas would have to do for Israel to stop is to free the 59 remaining hostages, only 24 of whom possibly remain alive – but all of whom are victims of a kidnapping that should not have happened in the first place.
- Sadly, there is no alternative to the complete removal of Hamas…. [T]here is no difference between Hamas’s political wing and its military wing. Hamas’s political wing, in fact, requires the military wing, to be able to stay in power.
- If the West falls for Hamas’s latest ploy, the terror group will simply soon be able to take control of the Gaza Strip with a rebranded name. Hamas’s primary goal, after all, is to remain in power.
- It is time to stop projecting Western values and aspirations onto Islamist societies. The protests in the Gaza Strip are not a shift toward peace. Instead, they are a symptom of the Palestinians’ failure, once again, to achieve their goal of murdering Jews and eliminating Israel.
- Make no mistake: Once the Palestinians recover from the war, they will continue their jihad against Israel. Many of the “anti-Hamas” protesters will then reappear, this time complete with masks, weapons and military gear.
The recent anti-Hamas protests in the Gaza Strip are seen by some Western and Arab political analysts as a positive and encouraging development.
Those who are rushing to celebrate the protests in Gaza need to consider that they are most likely nothing but a show by the Iran-backed Hamas to fool the world into thinking that there is an uprising against the terrorist group.
After all, this is the same Hamas that kept signaling to everyone, years before its terrorists attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, that it was not interested in another round of fighting. Then it murdered and brutally tortured 1,200 Israelis and kidnapped 251.
One of Hamas’s tactics has been to try to protect its terrorists by hiding them among civilians. According to some reports, Hamas members have been spotted leading some of Gaza’s demonstrations.
Hamas, in addition, is undoubtedly seeking to undermine the legitimacy of Israel’s war against terrorism by sending “innocent” civilians to the streets to protest the humanitarian and economic crisis in the Gaza Strip. Hamas is probably hoping that the world will see the poor “anti-Hamas” civilians peacefully protesting, then exert pressure on Israel to halt its fight against the terrorists.
What would Norway or Denmark do if ISIS or Al-Qaeda were on its border, seeking to destroy it?
Notably, most of the protesters appear to be fighting-aged men, thereby reinforcing the belief that they are terrorists who took off their military uniforms and suddenly became “civilians.”
Even if some of the protesters are not members of Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups, it is vital not to be fooled by what appears to be a sudden change of heart.
The protesters, like many of the residents of the Gaza Strip, are, in all probability, just trying to avoid more death and destruction now that they see Israel, fully backed by the Trump administration, resuming its counter-terrorism operations.
The fighting in the Gaza Strip picked up again on March 18, after Hamas breached the US-brokered ceasefire-hostages deal reached earlier in the year.
This is certainly not a change of heart: there has yet to be a single Palestinian criticism of Hamas’s October 7 massacre of Israelis. The protesters are not saying they are bothered by Hamas terrorists (and thousands of “ordinary” Palestinians) brutally murdering, raping, beheading, and burning alive hundreds of Israelis that day.
Please recall, thousands of Palestinians took to the streets on October 7, 2023, to cheer as Israeli hostages were dragged back into the Gaza Strip. The Palestinians not only chanted slogans in support of Hamas and the Palestinian “resistance,” many were filmed beating and spitting on the abducted Israeli men, women and children.
It is highly likely that many of the “anti-Hamas” protesters now are the same people who celebrated the October 7 carnage.
It would also be entirely wrong to assume that those who are demonstrating against Hamas are in favor of peace and coexistence with Israel. We did not hear or see one “anti-Hamas” protester hold a banner calling for peace or recognizing Israel’s right to exist.
If the protesters would really want to end the war, they would be urging Hamas to release the 59 Israelis hostages still held captive in the Gaza Strip. If the protesters were really eager to see an end to the war, someone would have tipped off Israel as to the whereabouts of the hostages. It is crucial to remember that in November 2024, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered a $5 million reward for the release of each hostage. Not one person in the Gaza Strip has come forward to this day.
At the “anti-Hamas” protests, we have not heard a single person call for an end to the genocidal jihadist fantasies of Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups. If elections were held in Gaza tomorrow, most of the protesters would, without doubt, vote for any Islamist terror group that seeks the destruction of Israel through slaughter, terrorism and jihad (holy war).
The talk about local clans possibly revolting against Hamas is an old fantasy that unfortunately never materialized. In the past, a small number of clans did openly challenge Hamas’s rule, but they were quickly suppressed and discredited by other, pro-Hamas, clans. Last year, Israel tried to encourage anti-Hamas clans to play a role in managing the Gaza Strip — without success. Regrettably, several clans have, over the past year, issued statements expressing support for Hamas as the “sole representative of the Gaza Strip.”
The current protests are taking place for one reason only: Hamas is conspicuously losing the war. Israel’s military force is working. The protesters are just angry that Israel retaliated so hard.
All Hamas would have to do for Israel to stop is to free the 59 remaining hostages, only 24 of whom possibly remain alive – but all of whom are victims of a kidnapping that should not have happened in the first place.
These Palestinian demonstrations are not going to bring down Hamas.
The demonstrators know full well that Hamas does not tolerate any form of criticism. Earlier this week, Hamas terrorists reportedly kidnapped, tortured and executed Odai al-Rabei, a 22-year-old Gazan who participated in an anti-Hamas protest. The murder presumably aims to send a warning to anyone who dares to speak out against the terror group. It also could be part of Hamas’s effort to distract attention from its involvement in the protests, which lasted only three days.
At present, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is the only army capable of destroying Hamas’s political and military infrastructure. So far, Israel seems to be doing an excellent job, especially, since October 7, with the destruction of most of Hamas’s military capabilities, and the elimination of several senior Hamas officials over the past two weeks.
Sadly, there is no alternative to the complete removal of Hamas. As noted earlier on these pages, there is no difference between Hamas’s political wing and its military wing. Hamas’s political wing, in fact, requires the military wing, to be able to stay in power.
If the West falls for Hamas’s latest ploy, the terror group will simply soon be able to take control of the Gaza Strip with a rebranded name. Hamas’s primary goal, after all, is to remain in power.
It is time to stop projecting Western values and aspirations onto Islamist societies. The protests in the Gaza Strip are not a shift toward peace. Instead, they are a symptom of the Palestinians’ failure, once again, to achieve their goal of murdering Jews and eliminating Israel.
Make no mistake: Once the Palestinians recover from the war, they will continue their jihad against Israel. Many of the “anti-Hamas” protesters will then reappear, this time complete with masks, weapons and military gear.
Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.
Palestinian ‘activism’ is actually domestic terrorism. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
These groups, such as “Palestine Action,” utilize the same ugly tactics and ideologies that have defined every major Palestinian terror organization for the past many decades.
MAR 30, 2025
This is not protest. This is premeditated violence. This is vigilantism dressed up as virtue.
And Palestine Action is proud of it.
According to their own website:
“Palestine Action is a direct action movement committed to ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime. Using disruptive tactics, Palestine Action targets corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex and seeks to make it impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians.”
This is not a fringe Facebook comment. This is their core strategy: Bypass law, ignore democratic process, refuse dialogue, and replace politics with sabotage. Their view of the world is cartoonishly black-and-white: Israel is evil, anyone connected to Israel is evil, and anything done in the name of fighting Israel — no matter how extreme or destructive — is justified.
And let’s be clear, their obsession with Israel is not about peace. It’s not about justice. It’s about hatred. These are people who don’t want Israel to defend itself — because they don’t believe Israel should exist.
The irony is striking: Palestine Action claims to oppose oppression, yet their tactics involve anonymous mob rule, vandalism, harassment, and open incitement to chaos. They scream about “genocide,” yet they promote a culture of aggression so unhinged that they coach followers on how to break into buildings, destroy infrastructure, hide their faces, avoid police, and dump evidence.
If a Right-wing group published a manual encouraging followers to destroy mosques or attack Black-owned businesses with sledgehammers and cement, it would be declared a hate group overnight — and rightly so.
But when the target is Israel? Suddenly, violence is “direct action,” and hate becomes “solidarity.”
This hypocrisy is both dangerous and telling. It proves what many of us already know: Antisemitism is the one bigotry that still gets a pass in elite circles — so long as it’s wrapped in the flag of Palestine and framed as “anti-Zionism.”
Make no mistake: This is not about defending Palestinians. This is about erasing Israel. And if Jews are collateral damage along the way, so be it.
What Palestine Action calls “solidarity,” any reasonable person would call criminal conspiracy. What they label “disruption,” the law calls domestic terrorism. And what they frame as “liberation” is just raw, dangerous fanaticism.
This isn’t activism; it’s anarchism with a specific ethnic target.
Palestine Action may style itself as a slick, grassroots, social justice collective. But peel back the buzzwords — “direct action,” “resistance,” “liberation” — and you’ll find the same ugly tactics and ideologies that have defined every major Palestinian terror organization for the past many decades.
From the Palestine Liberation Organization to Hamas, these groups have wrapped themselves in the language of justice while carrying out mass murder, hijackings, suicide bombings, and rocket attacks indiscriminately aimed at civilian population centers. Their targets have never been just Israeli soldiers — but buses, schools, cafes, airports, and synagogues.
Their true mission has always been rejectionism. Not peace. Not coexistence. Not even a two-state solution. Just the elimination of Israel.
And now, here comes Palestine Action, rebranded for the TikTok era, offering the same hate in different packaging. They swap suicide belts for spray paint and sledgehammers — but the ideology is the same.
Their goal isn’t reform. It’s destruction. Their playbook isn’t democratic engagement. It’s coordinated sabotage. They demonize not only the Jewish state, but every Jew or non-Jew who dares to do business with it.
They proudly refuse to work within democratic institutions — because, in their own words, they don’t believe “appealing to politicians” is useful. Instead, they call for shutting down companies, smashing property, evading the police, and escaping justice.
This is not new. It is the same warped mentality that led the Palestine Liberation Organization to murder Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics. The same rage that drives Hamas to fire rockets at children’s playgrounds from hospital rooftops. The same nihilistic obsession with Israel’s destruction that fuels generations of antisemitic hate.
Palestine Action may be operating in the UK instead of Gaza, but they are ideologically indistinguishable from the terror networks they mimic and admire. They are not activists. They are saboteurs with a PR team.
What makes this even more disturbing is how eagerly the Western Left has aligned itself with these radical, pro-terrorist movements. “Progressives” who would never tolerate violence, bigotry, or religious hatred from the right turn a blind eye — or worse, offer full-throated support — when the perpetrators wrap themselves in a Palestinian flag.
They excuse the inexcusable, justifying terror as “resistance,” vandalism as “direct action,” and open antisemitism as “anti-Zionism.” From campus protests to city councils, from cultural institutions to Left-wing media, we now see Palestine Action and its ilk elevated as heroes, while Jews who speak out for Israel are shouted down, harassed, or canceled.
The Western Left has long claimed to champion human rights. But when it comes to Jews and Israel, that commitment evaporates. Instead of standing with the only democracy in the Middle East, many now cheer for its destruction — alongside the same forces that would dismantle everything “progressives” supposedly stand for.
It’s not just hypocritical. It’s tragic. And dangerous.
The Left’s embrace of radical anti-Israel groups has legitimized antisemitism, normalized violence, and driven a wedge between Jewish communities and political movements they once called home.
In their desperation to appear “woke,” too many have fallen asleep to history.
And that is exactly why we must stand with Israel.
Because when Jews are hunted, harassed, and demonized in London, New York, Paris, Toronto, and Sydney — Israel remains the only country on earth founded with the explicit mission of protecting Jewish life.
So yes, every decent person must stand with Israel.
Because Palestine Action shows us exactly what the alternative looks like.
DOGE gone it! TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
MAR 30, 2025
Someone sent me this article and I agree. I rewrote some of it and added my own commentary. Stay frosty!
JEFF CHILDERS: USAID-CIA has been dismantled by DOGE and it appears that the next target of DOGE is to dismantle the CIA itself.
Trump’s war against the Deep State just entered its final, conclusive chapter, and the outcome will change history forever. Let me explain.
Was it purely coincidental that Rubio unexpectedly shuttered USAID-CIA last week and Ratcliffe unexpectedly invited Musk to meet with the CIA this Monday, March 31st?
Behold the timeline of just what we can see:
— On his first day in office, Trump created DOGE.
— DOGE’s first project was to wood-chip the CIA’s global laundromat, USAID.
— Weird legal fights erupted over the obscure “independent” agency.
— DOGE — solely under Trump’s control — continued penetrating most of the government.
— The Senate confirmed John Ratcliffe as CIA Director.
— Ratcliffe immediately fired an unknown number of CIA staff. (Battlefield preparation?)
— The JFK files delivered direct body blows against the CIA. (More battlefield preparation?)
— Trump declassified (not yet produced) all Crossfire Hurricane documents. (Even more?)
— Yesterday, Rubio officially ended USAID-CIA by Congressional notice.
— Yesterday, Ratcliffe publicly invited Musk into the CIA.
Why Musk, and not a regular DOGE team? Why announce it? Why is the media pretending this story is a nothing burger?
Imagine a new, AI-powered, top-secret, digital DOGE dashboard at CIA-Langley that can show CIA Director Ratcliffe and President Trump everything that the CIA is doing in real-time: every dollar, every operation, every contract, every overseas asset being paid — and only Trump’s team will hold the keys.
There are nearly 25,000 CIA Federal employees, and likely 100,000 others secretly embedded in the fake news & at NGOs, around the world. How do you find them all and keep track of them all so you can remove them? You follow the money. That’s what DOGE will do!
Once a DOGE dashboard is installed at the CIA, the Agency’s permanent staff can’t play their covert games anymore. No more secret drug ops. No more unauthorized coups. No more backchannel slush funds. No more false flag operations.
No more resist-Trump psyops.
If DOGE can pull this off, the CIA will properly become an extension of the White House, rather than the other way around, as it has been since 1947.
In other words, DOGE at the CIA is Trump’s nuclear option to take back control.
Right now, permanent, unelected bureaucrats and spies hold the real power, because they control the money, secrets, and the levers of influence, while manipulated elected officials come and go.
If CIA-DOGE integration sticks, then the Deep State will evaporate into a shallow pond. The DOGE dashboard will move the levers of control back into the White House. No more shadow government. No more covert meetings between “resisters” discussing how to undermine the elected President and thwart his agenda. No more spies using secret means to eavesdrop on the White House.
If I’m right, this is war. When Musk strolls into Langley HQ, it will signal the final, climactic battle. The Deep State cannot let Trump seize the intelligence machinery. If he does, their decades-long system of autonomy, black budgets, and unaccountable operations dies forever. Not “set back.” Not “dismantled” so it can later be rebuilt.
Eradicated forever.
The CIA’s permanent staff, their global financial network, and the entire shadow government lose everything the moment their money and operations become visible and thus controllable by the White House. Their only option is to stop this, at all costs.
On the other side, Trump obviously understands what happened to him in his first term. He did not govern, he was governed— by an unaccountable, uncontrollable bureaucracy. They ran Crossfire Hurricane, UkraineGate, two impeachments, and countless other regime-change operations— because they controlled the machine.
And they gleefully survived his presidency intact. Trump knows he won’t survive this second round unless he finishes the job. It’s not just politics anymore. This is an epic existential battle, for both sides.
As the Swamp recruits its overseas allies, anticipate coordinated global backlash —the media, the EU, the UN, the NGOs— all screaming about “dictators,” “tyranny,” “kings,” and “creeping authoritarianism.”
Given what we already know, we can expect false flag attacks pinned to DOGE or Musk to force public outrage and political blowback. Even more addled progressive terrorists will be activated to cause mayhem.
But Trump has been planning for this battle. He has done everything possible to pull its teeth. For better or worse, in his first 70 days, Trump engineered this apocalyptic showdown, making it inevitable and unescapable. This really is the final battle; there will be no round 3.
This is no small task. Because the CIA pretty much controls everything and has since 1947. All of these people are likely CIA cut-outs or operatives along with the media & thousands of NGOs. THEY ARE LURKING EVERYWHERE.
USAID=CIA
WEF=CIA
NPR=CIA
SOROS=CIA
HUNTER=CIA
MSNBC/CNN=CIA
ABC/NBC/CBS=CIA
VOA=CIA
EPSTEIN=CIA
MALONE=CIA
FAUCI=CIA
GOLDBERG=CIA
WRAY=CIA
EISEN=CIA
WEISSMANN=CIA
MCCORD=CIA
INGRAHAM=CIA
BARR=CIA
LBJ/FORD/BUSH/CHENEY/OBAMA/CLINTON/BIDEN=CIA-approved Presidents
And much much more…
PRAY!
Military Expert Notices Something STRANGE About October 7th that NO ONE Noticed [13:46] Rabbi Pinchas Taylor
Mar 29, 2025 – Nick Freitas exposes the Truth about Palestinian “Civilians”
Nicholas J. Freitas is an American politician and social media influencer. A Republican, he has been a member of the Virginia House of Delegates since 2016. He unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in 2018, losing in the primary election to Corey Stewart.
Hijinks with “Giza Underground City” [35:01] JOHN LEAKE
Pranksters at the Kahfre Project having fun with Synthetic Aperture Radar tomography
MAR 30, 2025
There is a long history of academic tomfoolery in archeology that makes for extremely entertaining reading. Johann Winckelmann and Heinrich Schliemann were both extremely colorful characters who, in addition to making real finds, had lively imaginations and a gift for storytelling.
Another notorious figure who was extremely adept at spinning all kinds of colorful yarns about the ancients was Aleister Crowley.
During the 1930s, the archaeologist Otto Wilhelm Rahn devoted his life to finding archaeological evidence of the Holy Grail myth that frequently appears in 19th century German literature and opera. During the Third Reich, SS director Heinrich Himmler thought he was an incomparable genius and funded Rahn’s whacky expeditions all over the world—the likely inspiration of the bad guys in the Indiana Jones movies.
As an archaeology buff, my eye was drawn to recent reporting about a group of researchers who call themselves the Kahfre Project who claim to have found evidence of a vast underground city beneath the pyramids of Giza.
The Kahfre Project consists of Corrado Malanga from the University of Pisa and Filippo Biondi from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland. The team claims to have discovered the subterranean network using advanced technology known as Synthetic Aperture Radar tomography.
I was very happy to see that my favorite ancient history YouTuber—an Italian who goes by the name The Metatron—just published a critical review of a large academic conference—with high priced tickets—recently hosted by the Kahfre Project.
Listening to it last night before bed gave multiple fits of laughter. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of such academic hijinks. My favorite moment is when one the researchers presents his analysis of spectral representations of the underground city, and then happens to mention—during his talk—that he is colorblind.
In recent years I have often thought that much of the political and academic establishment is now in the business of testing the gullibility of the public. The guys at the Kahfre Project are apparently pranksters of the highest order.
The Fake ‘Anti-Hamas’ Protests in Gaza BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
MAR 29, 2025 11:00 AM – There is no meaningful opposition to Hamas in Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood terror group retains the support of a majority of Arab Muslims occupying Gaza. While they’re far from enthusiastic about it, the only other game in town is the PLO’s Palestinian Authority which tends to be far more hated.
Plus Hamas has a way of shutting down protests very fast and in the most direct way possible.
The Arabs in Gaza live in a tribal society of clans. Everything is determined by connections to large families. Those families have a lot at stake and scramble for a place in the power blocs that run everything. Which means they don’t just have protests.
So what’s going on in Gaza where hundreds appear to be protesting Hamas? One basic question is why now?
The theme of the protests was a call for Hamas to step down and end the fighting. The sudden interest in ending the war is tied to the so-called Arab Plan for Gaza is moving forward. Under that plan, a fake ‘technocratic’ front group will run the place under the “supervision” of the PLO using ‘Palestinian’ troops trained by Jordan and Egypt. Hamas will supposedly not have a voice in the running of Gaza.
In reality, this is yet another variation of the same scheme that has been repeatedly proposed in which Hamas runs things from behind the scenes while a front group controlled by the PLO collects foreign aid.
(The Arab Plan estimates that rebuilding Gaza will cost $53 billion.)
The goal is creating an Islamic terrorist state in Gaza and Judea and Samaria with international recognition.
The sudden ‘protests’ against Hamas are meant to manufacture the myth that Arab Muslims occupying Gaza are ready for a new government.
Hamas didn’t greet the protests cheerfully, but neither did it cracked down as hard as it could. Pro-Hamas outlets like Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye are not acknowledging the protests while too many pro-Israel people are foolishly celebrating them as some sort of step forward. For the moment this is an internal dispute between two Jihadist groups, one overt and one covert, it doesn’t indicate peace or coexistence is here.
The protest is meant for public consumption in the Arab world and in the United States. It’s not a sea change, but the same old scam.
Greenland United TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
MAR 28, 2025
Vice President JD Vance, his wife Usha, national security adviser Michael Waltz, Energy Secretary Chris Wright & Senator Mike Lee visited Greenland today.
The group toured Pituffik Space Base, the northernmost U.S. military installation, which is crucial for missile defense, space surveillance, and Arctic security. Vance met with U.S. Space Force personnel, thanking them for their service and emphasizing the importance of their mission.
Amid President Trump’s desire for Greenland to align with America, the visit served as a high-profile statement of U.S. interest.
VP VANCE TO GREENLAND: “Why does Greenland matter so much? We know that Russia and China and other nations are taking an extraordinary interest in Arctic passageways, Arctic naval routes, and in the minerals of the Arctic territories. We need to ensure America is leading in the Arctic.”
Understand what JD Vance is saying. Notice how key Greenland is (geographically and strategically) to America for all the major arctic shipping routes for the world. It is also a strategic location for air and submarine surveillance in the northern hemisphere. If the US lets Russia & China control that – America is doomed. We will lose control of imports and exports, to our enemies, and also give them a military advantage – TO INVADE US – off our shores.
Supreme Court Finale TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
MAR 29, 2025
I think this is the REAL REASON why the Trump administration has now escalated its legal battle over the deportation of Venezuelan illegal gang members to the U.S. Supreme Court. This isn’t just some immigration case – this is how they plan to tie together EVERYTHING from election fraud to national security to judicial blackmail. Why? Because it all started in Venezuela. Read on.
Former CIA officer Gary Berntsen, one of the most highly decorated intelligence veterans in recent U.S. history, has come forward to confirm that the Venezuelan criminal gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) has been deliberately deployed into the United States by the Venezuelan regime, with the express intent of destabilizing the country through sabotage and violence.
According to Berntsen, Tren de Aragua is no longer just a violent street gang. Their core leadership and operational cells have undergone paramilitary training under the guidance of Venezuelan intelligence and military officials, aided in part by Cuban intelligence operatives and narco-terrorist networks throughout Latin America.
Quoting Berntsen, Miami Herald journalist Antonio Delgado wrote:
“The Venezuelan regime has assumed operational control of these guys [Tren de Aragua] and has trained 300 of them; they have given them paramilitary training, training them to fire weapons and how to conduct sabotage. They have given them all like a four- to six-week course. They put these 300 guys through that course, and then they were deploying them into the United States to 20 separate states.”
Berntsen explained that sabotage includes acts such as arson, and that recent patterns of mysterious industrial fires, wildfires, and urban blazes—notably in Los Angeles and other key areas—could plausibly be linked to these foreign-trained operatives.
BERNTSEN: “Many of these wildfires, industrial fires, the Los Angeles fires, taking advantage of wind and the local conditions, were started by arsonists. How many of them were paid or coerced by TdA or their surrogates?”
Even more disturbing than the operation itself is the claim that elements within the CIA have deliberately ignored or buried this intelligence. Berntsen revealed that two current CIA officials recently leaked false information to The New York Times, claiming there is no intelligence connecting Tren de Aragua to the Venezuelan government. Remember how they said the same thing about voting machine fraud in the United States?
But Berntsen says otherwise—and he has proof.
BERNTSEN: “The CIA doesn’t have the information because they refused to look at it. We tried to brief them about this three years ago, but they were directed by the Biden Administration to ignore it. And now those officials are trying to undermine President Trump.”
According to Berntsen, he has already shared intelligence and source material with the Trump administration of the ties between Tren de Aragua, Venezuelan and Cuban intelligence services, the CCP and high-level narco-terrorist operations.
Shariah in America [43:41]
Brigitte Gabriel with Mel K Talking About Danger Within Our Borders
MAR 29, 2025 ACT FOR AMERICA
The Dangers of Sharia Law in America
In a compelling discussion on the Mel K Show featuring Brigitte Gabriel, the alarming infiltration of Sharia law into American society is laid bare. The speakers articulate a stark warning: radical Islamic ideologies are not just a distant threat but a growing reality within the United States, particularly in communities across Texas and beyond. This summary encapsulates the key talking points, provocative facts, and urgent dangers that must be confronted head-on.
Main Talking Points
- Infiltration of Sharia Law: The introduction of Sharia law in America dates back to 1991, with the establishment of the first Sharia court in Richardson, Texas. This historical context underscores a long-term strategy by radical Islamic groups to embed their legal frameworks within American society.
- Radicalization of Communities: The speakers highlight the rise of radical Islamic communities that openly reject the U.S. Constitution and local law enforcement, asserting that only Allah’s laws hold authority. This sentiment is echoed in various cities, where local leaders appear to support these ideologies.
- Targeting Vulnerable Populations: There is a concerted effort to recruit individuals from marginalized communities, particularly African Americans, by framing Islam as a return to heritage and pride. This tactic is seen as a means to expand influence and undermine traditional American values.
- Political and Legal Maneuvering: The discussion points to the existence of numerous Islamic organizations operating within the U.S. that are allegedly funded by foreign entities, including Qatar. These organizations are accused of manipulating legal systems and political structures to further their agenda.
Teaser Facts
- 142 Cases of Sharia Law: Research indicates that there have been 142 instances where Sharia law has been applied in U.S. courts across 22 states, highlighting a significant encroachment on American legal principles.
- The Muslim Brotherhood Project: A documented 100-year plan by the Muslim Brotherhood outlines strategies to infiltrate and dominate Western societies, including the establishment of educational and political organizations aimed at subjugating these nations.
- Community Policing: The emergence of community policing specifically for Islamic populations raises concerns about parallel legal systems that could undermine public safety and cohesion.
Warnings and Dangers
The speakers emphasize that the rise of radical Islamic ideologies poses a direct threat to American freedoms and societal norms. The normalization of Sharia law and the radicalization of youth in schools are urgent issues that require immediate attention. They call for proactive engagement from citizens to ensure that elected officials hear their voices and understand the implications of these developments.
In conclusion, the discussion serves as a clarion call for vigilance and action against the creeping influence of Sharia law in America. It urges citizens to recognize the interconnectedness of these threats and to mobilize against them before it is too late. The time to act is now, as the future of American values hangs in the balance.
[Ed.:
Hamas Played Witkoff Like A Fool, Huckabee Is Revealing the TRUTH [59:48] Yishai Fleisher
March 27, 2025 Special Envoy Witkoff’s behind the scenes negotiating tactics versus soon-to-be Ambassador Huckabee’s moral clarity combined with extensive experience in Israel. Who will get results? Yishai and co-host Jake Bennett break it down.
Original full livestream from the day of the Senate Confirmation Hearing
Rabbi David Bar-Hayim: Hostages in Gaza: The Jewish Nation Must Come First [7:43]
March 29, 2025 Machon Shilo – A Message from the head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim
Caroline Glick Discusses PM Netanyahu’s Security Meeting About Turkish Actions inside Syria [17:51]
Mar 24, 2025 Tony Perkins – Caroline Glick, International Affairs Advisor to the Prime Minister of Israel, offers insight on the latest with Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu’s convening a security meeting over Turkish involvement in Syria.
Who Is Radical Judge James Boasberg? [9:09] JEROME R. CORSI, PH.D.
He Tried to Stop Illegal Immigrant Gang Deportation Flights, and Was Appointed to FISA by Chief Justice John Roberts
MAR 29, 2025
The Left keeps judge-shopping to find ways to feebly try to block President Trump’s Executive Orders. One judge in particular, Judge James Boasberg — the man who tried to block Trump’s deporting of Venezuelan gang members — is a curious case considering his background, associations and possible motives. Dr. Jerome Corsi takes a close look at this Radical Leftist judge on Corsi Nation.
Bill Gates: AI Will Replace Most Jobs Except Those Advancing Globalist Agenda Frank Bergman
March 28, 2025
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has gloated that the only jobs spared in the artificial intelligence-dominated near future will be those roles that help to advance the globalist agenda.
According to Gates, doctors, teachers, farmers, and most blue and white collar workers will be replaced by machines powered by artificial intelligence (AI).
Gates “predicts” that humans will no longer be needed “for most things” in the world.
However, Gates believes that some jobs will still require humans.
He argues that real people will be needed to work as coders, “climate change” experts, and “vaccine” scientists.
Conveniently, those roles align with Gates’s own interests and advance the globalist agenda.
Gates made the “predictions” during a recent interview with Jimmy Fallon, CNBC reported Wednesday.
During a segment of the full interview, Gates declared that soon humans won’t be “needed” for “most things.”
Gates made the comments while smiling and declaring that AI dominance is a “fantastic opportunity.”
WATCH [1:50]
REPEAL The PREP Act JAMES ROGUSKI
The PREP Act must be REPEALED. It clearly violates the Constitution and has led to an unmitigated abuse of power.
MAR 29, 2025
Continue reading. Please take action now!
