COMMENTARY / OPINION
Reacting to President Trump Declaring Antifa a Terrorist Organization [32:24] Andy Ngo
Sep 17, 2025 – President Trump declares Antifa a terrorist organization. I went live to unpack what this means legally, and what we should expect moving forward. Join Ngo
Yishai’s Reacts To Yuval Noah Harari on ISRAEL and GOD. [13:21] Yishai Fleisher
Sep 18, 2025 – Is Israel Just? Yishai digs into the views of Yuval Noah Harari. Yuval and Yishai are both Jews born in Israel – let’s focus on understanding their arguments. We look forward to your comments.
The Jewish debate has lost its mind. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
Lies, double standards, and open Jew-hatred have replaced reason in much of the global discourse.
SEP 18, 2025 The Future of Jewish
The global conversation about Israel has not merely become hostile; it has become ridiculous.
What passes today as “serious dialogue” is little more than propaganda dressed as virtue, conspiracies repackaged as common sense, and antisemitism disguised as moral clarity. If the stakes weren’t so high, the absurdities would be laughable.
But they are not harmless mistakes; they are symptoms of a moral collapse in how much of the world talks about Jews and our state.
A Stage Play With Predetermined Villains
Consider the United Nation’s latest “genocide” report. It concludes with a set of solemn recommendations for Israel — stop fighting, accept sanctions — but it makes no recommendations for Hamas. Not to release the hostages. Not to stop using civilians as shields. Not even a mild suggestion to abandon the stated goal of eradicating Israel. The omission is not oversight; it’s theater. The villain has been cast in advance, the script written before the curtain rises.
This selective outrage sets the tone for how the entire debate now unfolds: Israel is always guilty, and its enemies are always excused.
Old Tropes in New Outfits
That framing trickles down into the media. In Canada, journalist Élisa Serret recently claimed that America cannot detach itself from Israel because “the Jews finance a lot of American politics.” She added, “The big cities are run by Jews. Hollywood is run by the Jews.” It is a Nazi pamphlet recited on public radio, and no one batted an eye.
On social media, the tropes get louder. The founder of Palestine Action US celebrated the “assassination” of Charlie Kirk, lamenting only that more people cheered his death than the killings of “two actual Zionist war criminals.” The post remains up on X, unflagged. If it were directed at any other community, the platform would have exploded in outrage. Against Jews, it slides under the radar.
And then there is the mainstreaming of Holocaust denial and apology. A disturbingly antisemitic clip from the enormously popular “Fresh & Fit” podcast — a show with over 1.5 million YouTube subscribers — recently went viral. In it, hosts and guests claimed “the Jews don’t want to take accountability,” rationalized the Holocaust as a “plan” Hitler “had to do” to “save the world,” and fantasized about Jews “taking over government” and collapsing society.
The casual tone made it worse: This wasn’t the fevered rant of an extremist in a dark corner of the internet, but entertainment for a mass audience. Holocaust apologia and calls for “taking down the Jews” were presented as banter, with millions of young viewers listening in.
This is the landscape: Antisemitism is not hidden but openly celebrated, mainstreamed by media channels with massive reach and influence.
Lies, Always With the Same Fingerprints
When outright lies appear in this discourse, they always seem to trace back to the same sources. The claim that Benjamin Netanyahu bribed Charlie Kirk with $150 million originated with Max Blumenthal, a journalist who has written for the Iran-backed newspaper Al-Akhbar in Beirut and contributed to Al Jazeera. Time and again, conspiracy theories targeting Israel or Jews lead back to the propaganda machines of Iran or Qatar, whose fingerprints cover the disinformation campaigns that drive Western headlines.
And now Qatar has gone a step further. After the IDF struck senior Hamas officials meeting in Doha, the Gulf state announced it will pursue legal action against Israel at the International Criminal Court. Dr. Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi will lead the Qatari team, accusing Israel of “aggression against the State of Qatar.” Meanwhile, the ICC expresses no concern whatsoever that Qatar harbors the leaders of the terror group that carried out the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust on October 7, 2023.
Apparently, the cardinal sin is not sheltering mass-murdering terrorists, but daring to bring them to justice.
Performative Outrage and ‘Useful Infidels’
Even entertainment has become a theater for antisemitism. When Jewish actress Hannah Einbinder declared “Free Palestine” in her Emmy speech, Hamas praised her — and then blurred out her bare shoulders in its propaganda clips to maintain Islamic modesty codes. In other words: she was celebrated as a “useful infidel,” a Western Jew co-opted to advance the cause of those who would strip her of her rights and dignity if she lived under their rule.
The absurdity reaches TikTok too. A Palestinian influencer posted a video of her hair and nails appointment, followed only hours later by footage lamenting “genocide” in Gaza. Apparently, in this genocide, there is still room for manicures. The trivialization of atrocity into curated content makes a mockery of suffering and reduces truth to whatever sells in the algorithm.
The Cost to Real Jews
While antisemitism flourishes as spectacle, real Jewish professionals are paying the price. A recent report on Jewish social workers in the U.S. documented “exclusion, isolation, and public targeting” since October 7th.
These are people trained in empathy and community care, now ostracized in the very profession that preaches inclusivity. Their experiences show how the rhetoric of “justice for Palestine” metastasizes into hostility against Jews in everyday life.
Europe’s Hypocritical Morality Play
In Europe, hypocrisy has become policy. The European Commission recently proposed sanctions on Israeli ministers and partial suspension of its agreement with Israel. It is easier for Europe’s elites to vilify imagined Israeli demons than confront the very real jihadist networks and Muslim-led grooming gangs operating on their own soil. As one British commentator put it: these are the same elites who lecture about “fascism” while cheering death squads, censoring dissent, and overturning democratic votes they dislike.
Meanwhile, the United Nation’s chief antisemite Francesca Albanese claims Israel is using “unconventional weapons” in Gaza. The accusations shift constantly, but the message is the same: Jews must be told, in minute detail, the permissible ways they may defend themselves. Survival itself becomes conditional, dependent on the approval of their critics.
And, of course, Francesca sees nothing remotely wrong with Hamas’ use of human shields (including women and children), hostage-taking, and civilian infrastructure like schools and hospitals.
Activism as Cover
Even high-profile activism has been conscripted into this circus. Greta Thunberg’s flotilla, marketed as a humanitarian mission, has been tied to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood — providing cover for terror narratives under the cloak of global climate celebrity. Activism’s moral theater becomes camouflage for terrorism’s propaganda.
Intolerance at Home
In Dearborn, Michigan, a resident protested naming a street after a Hezbollah supporter. His objection was simple: Hezbollah bombed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, killing Americans.
The city’s (Muslim) mayor, Abdullah Hammoud, responded to the resident: “You’re an Islamophobe. And although you live here, I want you to know, as mayor, you’re not welcome here. And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of the city, because you are not somebody who believes in coexistence.”
Now, please tell us more about how opposing the Islamist terror group Hezbollah leads to the obvious conclusion that someone does not believe in coexistence.
The Pattern, Not the Exception
None of these incidents stand alone. They are all part of the same pattern: grotesque hypocrisy, casual antisemitism, lies amplified through institutions, and propaganda paraded as truth. From the UN to TikTok, from Brussels to Doha to Dearborn, the world has turned the Jewish conversation into a grotesque theater. The actors know their roles, the script is fixed, and the audience applauds without noticing how absurd — and dangerous — the performance has become.
Thomas Sowell once observed: “It’s a great tragedy that we’ve raised a generation who can tell the difference between 85 genders, but can’t tell the difference between right and wrong.”
The debate over Jews proves his point. The tragedy is not simply confusion; it is willful blindness, cultivated by institutions that prefer theater to truth. And the consequences are not just rhetorical.
This theater, if left unchallenged, will continue to endanger Jewish lives and corrupt everyone’s moral clarity.
The truth about why the US had to overthrow the ‘autocratic’ Assad regime and replace it with a group of Christophobic Islamic butchers
SEP 18, 2025
NOTE FROM LEO: Dear friends, the below article gives important history on the destruction of ancient Christian communities in Syria that I hope you will share with your friends and family. Meanwhile, if you appreciate these updates, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. This lets me know you value my independent reporting and analysis on issues that matter — war and peace, the surveillance state, globalism, etc. Some in my audience have canceled their subscriptions because they cannot handle any criticism of President Trump. I need those who appreciate honest and factual reporting, regardless of who it offends, to make up the difference. If you can afford $7 a month or $80 a year, please stand in the gap for me. Thank you and God bless.
The Associated Press reports that Syria’s foreign minister was in Washington on Thursday, September 18, “kicking off the first official visit to the United States by a top Syrian official in 25 years as the new government in Damascus struggles to recover from the civil war and boost relations with the West following the fall of autocrat Bashar Assad.”
The new Syrian government is filled with bloodthirsty Sunni jihadists, but the sick implication of the AP’s article is that they’re pro-Western, so it doesn’t matter.
Assad was backed by Russia and thus, in the eyes of the AP, he must be described as “autocratic.” While it’s true Assad was autocratic, all Arab leaders are autocratic and using this word to describe him doesn’t give the complete picture or context. Assad was in fact a protector of the Christian and Alawite religious minorities in Syria. He held off the dogs — the bloodthirsty Sunnis — and when he was overthrown with the help of Israeli and Western intelligence agencies, it became open season on Alawites and Christians. This is a fact the American neocons don’t want you to know.
Richard Ghazal lays out the sad story of Syria’s Christians in a July 7 op-ed for The Hill titled “The vanishing Christians of Syria: A crisis the world cannot ignore.”
But the AP can’t help itself. It can’t report the truth about Syria because it’s so tightly connected to the false narratives perpetrated by the U.S. military-industrial-intelligence complex, which is part of the neoconservative/neoliberal warmongering establishment in Washington. This establishment is inherently pro-Israel, but it’s also stridently pro-Sunni jihadist and anti-Russian. That’s why neocon Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham traveled to Syria in February 2012 and communicated to the Sunni tribes there that they had the backing of the West in their desires to overthrow Assad. From that point on, Syria disintegrated further and further into bloody civil war.
According to Ghazal’s article in The Hill, prior to the start of the Syrian Civil War, “Christians made up approximately 10 percent of Syria’s population and played key roles in academia, medicine, commerce and in public life. They coexisted with their Muslim neighbors to preserve a fragile but buoyant multiethnic, multiconfessional social fabric.”
The civil war, however, shattered this pluralistic order. Today, fewer than 300,000 Christians remain in Syria, down from roughly 2 million prior to the war.
To this day, I shudder whenever I hear a conservative pundit portray Putin as just another oldline KGB communist. The hatred of Russia has nothing to do with communism and everything to do with the struggle to maintain U.S./U.K./E.U. hegemonic control over the Middle East and the world. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, until it is, and that’s when U.S./Western adventurism triggers the slaughter of ancient Christian communities in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and elsewhere.
Putin is no doubt an authoritarian leader, a nationalist and a pragmatist who gravitates to policies that magnify his grip on power.
In other words, one could make the argument that Putin is very nearly a Russian version of Donald Trump. He likes power. He wields it unapolagetically, austensibly for the betterment of his country’s standing in the world. But he’s no communist. Get over it all you gals and guys working in the well-funded think tanks with your heads still firmly entrenched in the 1980s. If Putin was a communist he would not be vilified day in and day out by the liberal Western media in the U.S., U.K., Germany and France. He would not have been protecting Syria’s Christians.
Interestingly, when Russia was communist, the AP, The New York Times, The Guardian and other liberal Western news agencies treated them much better and gave them much less hostile coverage.
Thursday’s jubilent AP report reflected its giddiness that “Washington has steadily been easing sanctions imposed on Syria under Assad since after U.S. President Donald Trump met interim Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia in May — a key event that set Syria’s new authorities on the path to end decades of international isolation.”
Trump signed an executive order in June ending most of the U.S. economic sanctions on Syria, following through on a promise he made to the new Syrian president during their meeting. John McCain would be proud. Lindsey Graham is toasting the president and offering to pay for their next round of golf.
So the picture is clear. For all willing to see it. Align with Russia and you get branded a vicious dictator and are economically isolated by the West. Align with the U.S. and no matter how brutal you are to your own people, particularly Christians, you get an invite to the White House with offers of lucrative trade deals.
The new Syrian foreign minister, Asaad al-Shibani, earlier this year attended meetings with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, two of the major tools of Western hegemony used to shower friendly regimes with loans and financial goodies. He was also invited to New York where he held talks at the United Nations. Syria is now a member in good standing of the “international community,” aka modern Babylon. The Christian blood on the Syrian regime’s hands matters not. All that matters is they’ve agreed not to do business with Russia and to kiss the ring of Washington’s neocons while inviting in Western corporations to rebuild their war-torn nation. The Western corporations will be paid largely with loans that Syria’s new government gets from the IMF and World Bank. See how the scam works?
🔥From Doha to Madrid: The War Against Israel Grows🔥 [58:16]
AYNAZ ANNI CYRUS
September 18, 2025
A recording from Aynaz Anni Cyrus’s live video interviewing Barry Nussbaum
Exposed! Tucker Associate Dinesh D’Souza Reveals The REAL Reason He Hates Israel! [28:01]
September 15, 2025 JNS TV
D’Souza, known for films like “2016: Obama’s America” and “2000 Mules,” explains why this new project departs from his previous work and explores biblical archaeology, prophecy and the spiritual dimensions of Israel’s struggle. He and Traiman examine why radical Islam sees Israel not just as a military threat but as a moral and civilizational one: a liberal, Western outpost in the heart of the Middle East.
The conversation also confronts growing antisemitism in both left- and right-wing circles in the U.S., the ideological betrayal of Israel by figures like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and the disturbing rise in conspiracy theories that target Jews. D’Souza connects these trends to broader civilizational decline in the West and the abandonment of Judeo-Christian values, arguing that Jews and Christians must recognize the spiritual war they are both fighting.
They also reflect on the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk and the urgent need to restore sanity, morality and historical truth to public discourse.
#charliekirk #middleeastconflict
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Dinesh D’Souza and His Work
01:14 The Dragon’s Prophecy: A New Perspective on Israel
04:04 Hamas and the Philistines: Historical Parallels
05:58 The Alliance of Radical Islam and the Secular Left
09:00 Shifts in American Political Support for Israel
11:11 Understanding October 7th: A Historical Context
13:30 The Nature of Anti-Semitism and Criticism of Israel
15:40 The Role of Influencers in Shaping Opinions on Israel
18:50 Political Violence and Ideological Extremism
21:59 The Cultural War in America and Its Implications
24:31 The Spiritual Dimension of the Conflict
27:32 Conclusion and Call to Action
Debate on the White Paper in the House of Commons By Alex Grobman
September 18, 2025
Part XIV
In the debate on the White Paper on Palestine in the House of Commons on May 22, 1939, Conservative MP Leo S. Amery proclaimed it was “a direct negation of the principles which our administration in Palestine had been based, and, in my view at any rate, a repudiation of the pledges on the strength of which the Government of Palestine was entrusted to our hands.” The White Paper was nothing more than an admission of failure and appeasement. Amery accused the government of having enacted the policy to “appease the Arabs, appease the Mufti. Appease them at all costs,” which was nothing more than “a direct invitation to the Arabs to continue to make trouble.”
Historian Martin Gilbert quotes Winston Churchill, in his House of Commons speech, addressing Jewish and Arab immigration to Palestine since the establishment of the Mandate. The Peel Commission had reported that Arab migration to Palestine had increased as Palestine became a center of economic activity. The Palestine census of 1931 revealed that many Arabs living in Palestine were born in Algeria, Tripoli, Yemen and Morocco. Churchill was so struck by this fact that he remarked, “So, far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population.”
Churchill vilified the White Paper when he said on May 23, 1939: “As one intimately and responsibly concerned in the earlier stages of our Palestine policy, I could not stand by and see solemn engagements into which Britain has entered before the world set aside for reasons of administrative convenience or—and it will be a vain hope—for the sake of a quiet life…. It is often supposed that the Balfour Declaration was an ill-considered, sentimental act largely concerned with the Right Honorable Member for Carnarvon Boroughs (Mr. Lloyd George), for which the Conservative Party had no real responsibility, and that, as the Secretary of State said yesterday, it was a thing done in the tumult of the War. But hardly any step was taken with greater deliberation and responsibility.
“…. Not only did the War Cabinet of those days take the decision, but all Cabinets of every party after the War, after examining it in the varying circumstances which have arisen, have endorsed the decision and taken the fullest responsibility for it. It was also endorsed in the most cordial and enthusiastic terms by many of the best Conservative private members who came into the House when a great Conservative majority arrived after the General Election at the end of 1918. It was endorsed from the very beginning by my right honorable friend the Prime Minister.”
‘To Whom Was the Pledge of the Balfour Declaration Made?’
Churchill then posed the question: “To whom was the pledge of the Balfour Declaration made?” His answer: “It was not made to the Jews of Palestine, it was not made to those who were actually living in Palestine. It was made to world Jewry and in particular to the Zionist associations. It was in consequence of and on the basis of this pledge that we received important help in the War, and that after the War we received from the Allied and Associated Powers the Mandate for Palestine.
“This pledge of a home of refuge, of an asylum, was not made to the Jews in Palestine but to the Jews outside Palestine, to that vast, unhappy mass of scattered, persecuted, wandering Jews whose intense, unchanging, unconquerable desire has been for a National Home—to quote the words to which my right Honorable Friend the Prime Minister subscribed in the Memorial which he and others sent to us: ‘the Jewish people who have through centuries of dispersion and persecution patiently awaited the hour of its restoration to its ancestral home.’
“Those are the words. They were the people outside, not the people in. It is not with the Jews in Palestine that we have now or at any future time to deal, but with world Jewry, with Jews all over the world. That is the pledge, which was given, and that is the pledge which we are now asked to break, for how can this pledge be kept, I want to know, if in five years’ time the National Home is to be barred, and no more Jews are to be allowed in without the permission of the Arabs?”
What Does Britain Owe the Arabs?
Churchill then turns his attention to what the British owe the Arabs for their role in World War I: “I cannot feel that we have accorded to the Arab race unfair treatment after the support which they gave us in the last War. The Palestinian Arabs, of course, were for the most part fighting against us, but elsewhere over vast regions inhabited by the Arabs, independent Arab kingdoms and principalities have come into being such as had never been known in Arab history before. Some have been established by Great Britain and others by France.
“When I wrote this dispatch in 1922 I was advised by, among others, Colonel [T.E.] Lawrence, the truest champion of Arab rights whom modern times have known. He has recorded his opinion that the settlement was fair and just—his definite, settled opinion. Together we placed the Emir Abdulla in Transjordania, where he remains faithful and prosperous to this day. Together, under the responsibility of the Prime Minister of those days, King Feisal was placed upon the throne of Iraq, where his descendants now rule. But we also showed ourselves continually resolved to close no door upon the ultimate development of a Jewish National Home, fed by continual Jewish immigration into Palestine. Colonel Lawrence thought this was fair then. Why should it be pretended that it is unfair now?”
From June 8-June 29, 1939, the Permanent Mandates Commission met to discuss the White Paper, issued by the British government under the direction of Malcolm McDonald, secretary of state for the colonies. So out of touch with reality, he declared, “Time is needed for hatred and suspicion to be removed, for the Jews and Arabs to accustom themselves to the fact that they have to live side by side in Palestine, and for tolerance and co-operation to grow between them; it is too early to speak with any confidence of the form of constitution which will be appropriate when the peoples of Palestine are ready to become self-governing.”
In its report to the Council of the League of Nations, the Commission unanimously concluded that “the policy set out in the White Paper was not in accordance with the interpretation, which in agreement with the Mandatory Power and the Council, the Commission had placed upon the Palestine Mandate.”
Dr. Alex Grobman is the senior resident scholar at the John C. Danforth Society, a member of the Council of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East and on the advisory board of the National Christian Leadership Conference of Israel (NCLCI). He has an MA and PhD in contemporary Jewish history from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Rosh Hashanah Guide for the Perplexed, 2025 Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger
September 18, 2025 “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
Based on ancient Jewish Sages
The evening of September 22, 2025 will launch the Jewish New Year of 5786, underscoring family bonding, human fallibility, and the continuous evolution of one’s character and the benefits of renewal, judgment and reflection through:
1. Self-examination. Rosh Hashanah initiates a wake-up call of ten days of self-examination and repentance, which are concluded on Yom Kippur (the Day of Repentance). This self-examination should be guided by morality-driven tenacity, determination, humility and faith, re-studying moral values and avoiding past errors.
The root of the Hebrew word Shanah is “repeat” (every year) and “change.”
2. Genesis. Rosh Hashanah commemorates the 6th day of Creation, when the first human-being, Adam, was created. Adam is the Hebrew word for a human-being (אדמ), which is the root of the Hebrew word for “soil” (אדמה) – a metaphor for humility. The Hebrew word for Adam is, also, an acronym of Abraham, David and Moses, who were role model of humility.
The Hebrew word Rosh (ראש) means first/head/beginning and Hashanah (השנה) means the year. Rosh (ראש) is the root of the Hebrew word for Genesis (בראשית), which is the first (Hebrew) word in the Book of Genesis. Rosh Hashanah is celebrated on the first day of the Jewish month of Tishrei – “the month of the Strong Ones” (Book of Kings A, 8:2) – when the three Jewish Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) and the Prophet Samuel were born. Tishrei means beginning/Genesis in ancient Acadian. The Hebrew letters of Tishrei (תשרי) are included in the spelling of Genesis (בראשית). Furthermore, the Hebrew spelling of Genesis (בראשית) includes the first two letters in the Hebrew alphabet (אב), a middle letter (י) and the last three letters (רשת) – representing the totality of the Creation.
3. Responsibility. The late Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, the iconic Talmudic scholar, compared the calendar year to a human body, consisting of the head/brain, the heart and the liver. Thus, on Rosh Hashanah (head/brain) one contemplates the vision of the coming year, while the rest of the year facilitates the implementation of the vision in a balanced coordination between the head/brain, heart and the liver of the year.
4. The Shofar (a ritual ram’s horn). Rosh Hashanah is announced and celebrated by the blowing of the (bent/humble) Shofar, the horn of the humble and determined non-predator ram. The initial blowing of the Shofar is indicated in Leviticus 23:23-25 and Numbers 29:1-6: “a day of blowing the shofar.”
The Hebrew spelling for Shofar שופר)) is a derivative of the verb to enhance and improve שפר)).
The sound of the Shofar was used to alert people to physical challenges (e.g., military challenges). On Rosh Hashanah, the Shofar alarms people to spiritual challenges – a wakeup call for enhancing one’s behavior.
The Shofar represents “peace-through-strength,” as demonstrated by the peaceful ram, which is equipped with powerful and deterring horns.
In ancient times, the blowing of the Shofar was employed to announce the (50th) year of the Jubilee – the Biblical role model of liberty: “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land and unto all the inhabitants thereof (Leviticus 25:10).” The Jubilee inspired the US Founding Fathers’ concept of liberty as inscribed on the Liberty Bell, as it inspired the US Abolitionist, anti-slavery movement.
The English word Jubilee is derived from the Hebrew word Yovel, which is a synonym for horn-Shofar.
5. Commemoration. The 100 blows of the Shofar commemorate the creation of Adam, the first human-being; the almost-sacrifice of Isaac, which was prevented by a ram; the receipt of the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai; the tumbling of the walls of Jericho upon re-entering the Land of Israel, which was facilitated by the blowing of the Shofar; Judge Gideon’s war against the Midianites, which featured the blowing of the Shofar; and the reaffirmation of faith in God, the Creator (“In God We Trust”). The blowing of the Shofar underscores the transformation from despondency (the destruction of the two Temples in Jerusalem and the ensuing exiles) to fulfilled optimism (the ingathering to – and the reconstruction of the Land of Israel).
The 100 blows of the Shofar are divided into three series, honoring the three Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac and Jacob), the three parts of the Old Testament (the Torah, Prophets, Writings) and the three types of human beings (pious, mediocre, evil).
6. Pomegranate. On Rosh Hashanah, it is customary to eat seeds of pomegranate, which is one of the seven Biblical species of the Land of Israel (wheat, barley, grapes, dates, figs, olives and pomegranates), representing health (high in iron, anti-oxidants, anti-cancer, enhances cardiac and digestion systems), righteousness, fruitfulness, fertility, longevity, learning and wisdom.
7. Honey. Rosh Hashanah meals include honey, sweetening the coming year. The bee is the only insect which produces essential food. It is a community-oriented, constructive and a diligent creature. The Hebrew spelling of bee (דבורה) is identical to “the word of God” (דבור–ה’), and Deborah דבורה)) who was one of the seven Jewish prophetesses, as well as a military leader.
May it be a year of victory and liberation for the Gaza Hostages
They don’t mind dead Jews Avi Abelow
September 18, 2025 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel
On the one hand, scary times to be a Jew…
Charlie Kirk was executed, and instead of mourning or seeking truth, some conservative influencers are jumping into blaming Israel, reviving lies, distortions, and age-old conspiracies.
A generation craving clarity is being fed confusion, and the death of a good man is being hijacked to spread Jew-hatred and turn young conservatives against Israel, something he would abhor. I can say that clearly, as I was looking forward to seeing him on an upcoming trip of his to Israel, planned months ago, long before the Bill Ackman meeting and the Netanyahu phone call.
Meanwhile in Israel, some are saying, “This is not the country I want to live in,” reacting to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s call for military self-reliance and his comparison to Sparta. Suddenly, they can’t handle the truth, we have enemies who want us dead and allies who won’t help us stop them. Their illusions of peace have shattered, but they still refuse to accept the reality, a genocidal Islamic enemy surrounds us, using the invented identity of “palestinians” to rally global support in their war against us.
But as the West turns its back, imposing embargoes, applying diplomatic pressure, and isolating us, I’ll say this plainly:
This is exactly the Israel I want to live in.
Not because it’s easy. Not because we’re loved. But because we are finally waking up, shedding illusions that nearly destroyed us on October 7th.
The world isn’t turning on us because we’re doing something wrong. It’s turning on us because we’re winning.
They don’t mind dead Jews. They build museums and cry at our graves. But when we defend ourselves? When we dare to survive?
Suddenly, we’re the villains.
Let that sink in.
Sympathy for the Oct. 7 massacre evaporated the moment we fought back in Gaza to make sure it never happens again, immediately being told to stop. “Don’t go into Gaza”. Then “Don’t go into Rafah” etc.
We are not hated because we’re cruel. We’re hated because we’re winning.
And that strength, the choice to fight, to protect, to live, is shaking a world that grew comfortable with weak Jews.
Let them talk about “proportionality.” Let the naive call for coexistence with genocidal terrorists. We’ve buried our children. We’ve heard the screams of our raped women. We know better.
“Never again” is not a slogan. It’s a mission.
Victory isn’t optional. It’s the only way to secure our children’s future. And if that offends the UN or college campuses, so be it.
Netanyahu is right: We must become self-sufficient. Let the West embargo us. Let them condemn us. We will lean not on their approval, but on our faith, unity, and national destiny.
The Torah says: Do not fear them, for the Lord your God is with you.
We were never meant to fear enemies, or friends who turn their backs. We are meant to fear God alone and walk proudly in His land.
To those losing hope as anti-Israel sentiment grows, especially with the loss of Israel support in young conservatives after Charlie Kirk’s murder, know this:
Israel isn’t broken. Israel is being rebuilt.
No more dependence on global approval. No more illusions of Oslo or coexistence with monsters. No more fear of boycotts or cancel culture.
We are back in our homeland, aligned with our mission, guided by our faith, and strengthened through trial.
This is the Israel I prayed to live in. This is the Israel we are called to build.
In 1967, the world respected us. In six days, we crushed enemies bent on our destruction, reunited Jerusalem, and changed the region.
They didn’t love us, but they respected us.
America only began to sell Israel weapons after we won the miraculous six-day war. Up until that war, Israel was reliant on France for weapons! Internalize that.
Today, after the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, the world turns on us again, not because we’re militarily weak, but because of an internal deep-state that projects national weakness to the world, that has forced the war to drag on too long.
Why?
Because the hostage crisis was weaponized.
Of course we love our hostages. But the left, the media, and Israeli elites that publicly claim Netanyahu and his government are more dangerous than Hamas, used the hostage issue to demoralize and divide our nation, pressure Israel into restraint, and stall and elongate the war effort.
Instead of total victory, we got endless ceasefires, reliance on Qatar, the very sponsors of Hamas, and continuous internal protests weakening national morale.
And when a war drags on because of internal demoralization, the world smells weakness, even when we’re winning.
The truth? Israel is winning. Hamas is cornered. Gaza is in ruins. Hezbollah is shrinking. Iran is stunned. Qatar is scared.
But a powerful, yet tiny, deep state, together with a mainstream media echo chamber, projecting weakness give our enemies hope and invite pressure from the world.
In 1967, we didn’t apologize. We didn’t flinch. We didn’t negotiate. We won, united and unapologetically. Same as in the 1973 war.
That clarity, that spiritual strength, made us untouchable. We need it again.
Stop waiting for permission. Stop caring what the world thinks. Remember who we are, why we’re here, and who truly writes this story.
God brought us home. He sustains our soldiers. He is the reason we survive.
Military victory is the easy part. The harder struggle is internal, against the deep state and media voices of doubt, division, and demoralization.
When we overcome that internal enemy, when we unite around our purpose and recognize God as our source of national strength, we will not only defeat our enemies, we will earn the world’s respect again.
And more importantly, we will find real peace, not with our enemies, but within ourselves.
So, do not be depressed because of the growing Jew-hatred and anti-Israel sentiment.
Hold on to your faith. This is the fire molding us into the God fearing nation, in our ancestral homeland that we are supposed to be. We will overcome it all, external and internal.
This is our moment to awaken, to teach the deeper spiritual truth behind this war.
For the hostages. For the fallen. For our children. For our future. For humanity.
For the God of Israel, who never slumbers or sleeps, brought us home to be a light unto the nations, from this holy land, forever.
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
Something is Very Wrong with Tyler Robinson’s “Confession” | Daily Pulse
The news you weren’t supposed to see. Maria Zeee
SEP 17, 2025 THE VIGILANT FOX
STORY #1 – Congress just blew the lid off geoengineering. MTG forced a hearing that exposed cloud seeding and undisclosed “other” chemicals raining down on America.
The danger isn’t theoretical—it’s happening now.
Scientists warned that spraying sulfates could spark acid rain and devastate crops. RFK Jr. once vowed, “we are going to stop this crime,” yet testimony suggested the real power may rest with DARPA—raising the chilling question of whether even the head of HHS can stop it.
Rep. Tim Burchett demanded a federal ban. “If there’s any doubt about safety, the practice must end now,” he said. This isn’t theory—it’s about America’s food supply and who controls it.
Maria Zeee uncovers which agencies are implicated, what “other” really means, and why geoengineering could push the nation to the brink of food and environmental collapse.
Click here to watch the full episode.
STORY #2 – The official narrative around Tyler Robinson’s alleged text confession is collapsing under its own contradictions—and the backlash is only getting louder.
ABC’s Matt Gutman bizarrely tried to frame the alleged messages as a “touching” love story, but the details raise disturbing new questions.
The texts read more like a script than a real exchange. Robinson supposedly vowed to take his secret to the grave, yet left a confession note under his keyboard that then disappeared.
He also “confessed” in long, traceable texts that conveniently echoed every official talking point: a rifle wrapped in a towel, engraved bullets, a clothing change, even clearing a decoy suspect.
On top of that, investigators say they found a screwdriver with his DNA—raising the question of why he’d dismantle and reassemble the rifle if his goal was to leave no trace.
The deeper you dig, the stranger it gets—and Maria Zeee’s explosive report reveals what the media refuses to show you.
Click here to watch the full episode.
STORY #3 – A bombshell study has found the genetic “fingerprint” of the COVID vaccine embedded in the DNA of a 31-year-old cancer patient—the first direct proof that mRNA fragments can integrate into the human genome.
The finding shatters years of assurances from Big Pharma and health officials who swore the shots could never alter DNA. Researchers described a “perfect storm”: tumor-suppressing genes switched off, DNA repair mechanisms broken, and cancer-driving pathways ignited.
The woman, once healthy, developed stage 4 bladder cancer within a year of three Moderna doses. Genetic fragments in her tumor matched vaccine sequences with odds of “one in a trillion.” Co-author Nicolas Hulscher warned the world “cannot afford to ignore” what may point to turbo cancers, strokes, and even inherited DNA damage.
The implications are staggering. Maria Zeee’s report exposes what regulators are desperate to bury—don’t miss it.
Click here to watch the full episode.
Thanks for watching. Follow us (@Zeee_Media and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see.
We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then.
The Trap in Damascus AYNAZ ANNI CYRUS
Israel’s secret talks with Syria’s new regime could hand Iran the battle map
SEP 17, 2025 – Opinion
When Axios leaked details on September 16, 2025, of Israel’s quiet negotiations with Syria’s new government, the headlines looked clinical: demilitarized zones, no-fly areas, and a guaranteed air corridor eastward. On the surface, that reads like Israel is cementing its security. But step back, and you see something far more dangerous. What’s being described is not a defensive arrangement. It is a document that risks giving Iran protection under the cover of a ceasefire and giving Syria’s fragile Islamist-rooted regime international legitimacy it has not earned.
Who Is Israel Negotiating With
The Syrian state is now in the hands of a transitional government, established after the collapse of the old order in late 2024. At its center is Ahmed al-Sharaa, installed as transitional president in January 2025 under an interim constitution. Al-Sharaa is not a technocrat or a neutral caretaker; he rose from the ranks of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a group born out of al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch.
This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
This “caretaker” government is a patchwork of Islamist factions and fragile alliances, not a stable democracy. For Israel to sit across the table from al-Sharaa is not to negotiate with a reformed state, but to legitimize a leadership that grew out of jihadist networks and continues to operate within Tehran’s orbit.
What Israel Is Offering
Axios laid out the proposal in careful terms:
Three zones in southern Syria, each with different military restrictions. The closer to Israel’s border, the fewer Syrian troops allowed. On paper, that lowers the risk of clashes. In practice, it depends on Damascus reining in militias it has never controlled.
Demilitarized and no-fly areas southwest of Damascus, meant to create buffers along Israel’s frontier. The idea is to keep aircraft, drones, and heavy weapons back. But no-fly zones are only as strong as the regime enforcing them, and Syria has long let Iran and its proxies operate freely.
A protected aerial corridor eastward, giving Israel written assurance it can cross Syrian skies to reach Iran if strikes are needed. This is the centerpiece. It looks like a safeguard, but once codified, it becomes a framework Iran can study, exploit, and use to rally international pressure whenever Israel acts.
Israel frames the deal as an update to the 1974 disengagement agreement, borrowing language from the 1979 peace treaty with Egypt. On paper, it appears precedent. In reality, it is new: Israel asking Damascus for permission slips on its most critical defense priority, stopping Iran’s nuclear march.
Why This Is Not Security, But a Trap
The corridor is the key. Israel believes it is securing access, but any agreement signed with Damascus would almost certainly include maps, boundaries, and operational limits. Once those details are written down and formalized, they do not stay secret. Agreements are archived, shared with guarantors such as the United States or Russia, circulated through the United Nations system, and often leaked or referenced in diplomatic channels.
Iran already has deep networks inside Syria. Intelligence officers, militias, and political allies ensure that whatever Syria signs will make its way to Tehran. Once Iran has access to those maps, it gains advance knowledge of Israel’s intended routes and restrictions. In war, surprise is everything. If Iran knows where Israel is likely to fly and what areas Israel has promised to avoid, then Israel’s most valuable advantage, unpredictability, is lost.
The danger is not only in the words written on paper. It is the visibility Israel hands to its enemy by locking strategy into a framework that Damascus cannot keep out of Tehran’s reach.
This is not speculation. The Oslo Accords produced detailed maps that Hamas studied and later used to plan attacks. The 2005 withdrawal from Gaza created a vacuum that Hamas filled, turning it into one of the most entrenched terror bases in the world. Each time Israel trusted agreements to protect its borders, its enemies used the paperwork as weapons.
By negotiating with Ahmed al-Sharaa’s government today, Israel is repeating that mistake on a larger scale.
Who Really Gains
Syria’s Transitional Government
The new administration in Damascus gains recognition that it could never have earned on its own. By negotiating directly with Israel, it receives a seat at the table of international diplomacy. For Ahmed al-Sharaa, this is not just policy but survival. He can present himself as a statesman who extracted concessions from Israel, even though his power rests on fragile alliances. Legitimacy abroad helps him consolidate power at home.
Iran
Tehran gains both time and protection. What Israel sees as a guarantee of access can just as easily become Iran’s shield. Once Israel commits its operations to writing, Iran will have the advantage of knowing where the red lines lie. That knowledge allows Tehran to continue strengthening its nuclear and missile programs while calculating around Israel’s constraints. Every delay or diplomatic layer buys Iran more breathing room.
Washington
The United States gains a headline. With the UN General Assembly convening, the White House wants to showcase “progress” in the Middle East. Whether the agreement holds or collapses later matters less than being able to point to negotiations as proof of diplomacy at work. For Washington, this is about optics, not outcomes.
Israel
Israel gains the least. At best, it can claim legal cover for strikes it has always carried out without asking permission. At worst, it binds itself to agreements that enemies can study and exploit. The element of surprise, critical to Israel’s survival, is replaced by documents that others can examine, circulate, and plan around. Once operations are mapped, they cease to be strategy; they become targets.
Israel does not need Damascus to approve its survival. A government led by an HTS commander is not a security partner.
A corridor to Tehran mapped out in Damascus is not an advantage; it is a trap.
Obama & the NGA Peggy Tierney
SEP 17, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
This is Part 5 of my report on Charlie. You can find Parts 1-4 here. I suggest you read them in order – they build on each other to create the whole picture.
Obama emerged from his viper’s nest this week to speak about Charlie. What he said is important and shows what they have planned. They ALWAYS tell you what they did – they can’t help themselves.
OBAMA: “Look, obviously I didn’t know Charlie Kirk. I was generally aware of some of his ideas. I think those ideas were wrong, but that doesn’t negate the fact that what happened was a tragedy and that I mourn for him and his family. He’s a young man with two small children and a wife who obviously – and a huge number of friends and supporters who cared about him. And so, we have to extend grace to people during their period of mourning and shock.”
Barack Obama spoke at the Jefferson Educational Society in Erie, Pennsylvania, on September 16, 2025.
Then Obama went on to bash President Trump and his cabinet and praise Governor Spencer Cox of Utah and Governor Josh Shapiro for how they handled the situations at Butler and at UVU. He even said that George W. Bush was much better at bringing people together than President Trump because he didn’t speak out against Islam.
That tells me everything I need to know!
OBAMA: “I’ve been very impressed with Governor Cox in Utah and how he’s approached some of these issues. Cox is a Republican, self-professed conservative Republican, but in his response to this tragedy, as well as his history of how he engages with people who are political adversaries, he has shown, I think, that it is possible for us to disagree while abiding by a basic code of how we should engage in public debate and Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has done the same thing.”
“When I hear not just our current president, but his aides, who have a history of calling political opponents vermin, enemies, who need to be ‘targeted,’ that speaks to a broader problem that we have right now and something that we’re going to have to grapple with, all of us.”
“George Bush, while I don’t agree with him on a lot of stuff, he is a good, gracious man. He explicitly went out of his way to say, “We are not at war against Islam.”
Charlie didn’t like Governor Spencer Cox and thought he was a transgender-loving RINO in bed with the Democrats! The fact that Obama loves him is a HUGE RED FLAG.
Dismantle the Teachers’ Unions’ Stranglehold
September 17, 2025 ACT For America
Teachers’ unions, led by the NEA and AFT, exploit educators, enforce woke ideologies, and fail students—repeal their power now through federal and state action.
Repeal the NEA’s Charter: Ban dues for political lobbying, restrict collective bargaining, ensure right-to-exit, and end mandatory dues. States must follow: outlaw bargaining where it lingers, cap union influence, and redirect tax dollars to classrooms, not elites.
End Exploitation: Entry-level teachers are exploited, earning half the wages of veterans, fueling unions that peddle self-inflicted poverty wages and keeping newbies underpaid as bargaining chips. Percentage raises funnel most funds to tenured staff—$4,250 versus $2,226 in a 5% hike. Restore meritocracy over tenor and link wages to performance!
Unions force-feed divisive curricula—transgender secrecy, graphic sex ed, DEI resentment, and anti-American revisionism—silencing parents and indoctrinating kids. Proficiency scores hit rock bottom, trailing Vietnam, as honor students sue over illiteracy.
Unaccountable Power: NEA ($375 million in dues) and AFT (1.7 million members) rule with iron fists, backed by state affiliates. Unelected, they siphon billions in local taxes, propping up a failing system without oversight, while lawlessly weaponizing a Leftist political operation and agenda on the taxpayer dime! They must be neutered.
Lawmakers, parents, and educators must unite—strip unions of federal legitimacy, break their state-level grip, and free schools from this corrupt cartel. American education is in shambles—students lag globally, teachers burn out, and communities foot the bill for union greed. Defang them to restore merit, accountability, and learning. Generations of students are already sentenced to unskilled work, with two-thirds of students nationwide illiterate and mathematically challenged.
Call on Congress to Act Now, or lose another generation!
CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk was the TARGET of a SHADOW FBI OP [12:58] Jesus Enrique Rosas
September 16, 2025 The Body Language Guy
Buying land from Arabs. Alex Grobman
September 16, 2025 Jewish Press
An article in Arutz 7 today about the late Moshe Zar, the “Samaria land redeemer,” brought to mind the issue of land sales by Arabs to Jews and how Jews were accused of stealing their land. As soon as Judea and Samaria were liberated, Moshe sought to establish sovereignty over the region by purchasing land from the Arabs, his wife, Yael, said. “He bought from every Arab who offered him land…. They loved him, trusted him, he never cheated them, he paid whatever price they asked and always exchanged their money at an Arab money changer so they would have dinars….They all came secretly to sell land, she reveals.”
Below is an article I wrote on the subject of land sales which Arabs leaders officially condemned.
Jews and the Land of Israel: Part XIII: Arab Leadership Vigorously Protested the Sale of Land to Jews By Alex Grobman PhD.
15 Sivan 5783 – June 4, 2023
*Editor’s Note: This is the thirteenth installment in the most recent series of articles from Jewish Press Online contributor, Alex Grobman, PhD
It is not surprising Arabs fail to mention that prominent Arab leaders and nobility sold land to the Jews, while publicly opposing the sales. Historian Kenneth W. Stein found that although the Arab leadership vigorously protested selling land to Jews, large and small Arab landowners were constantly offering to sell their land before and after the British Mandate came into existence. [1] Arab protests against land sales were hypocritical according to Dr. Heinrich Wolff, the Nazi German consul in Jerusalem. In a cable sent to his Berlin office in 1933, he said, these nationalists “in daylight were crying out against Jewish immigration and in the darkness of the night were selling land to the Jews.” [2]
Arabs also acted as intermediaries. Even during the period when anti-Zionist and anti-British opinion had reached a feverish pitch, Palestinian Arabs were more preoccupied with their own individual concerns than the emerging Arab national movement. Arab society was split socially and politically, allowing the Zionists to procure land without serious opposition. Additionally, Palestine’s rural economy was “weak” before and during World War I and “purchasers knew about the perennial economic distress of the Arab fellaheen (peasants).” The Palestinian Arabs with small tracts were more inclined to alienate their land in the 1930s when their economic existence was their principal incentive. [3]
Once the British administration established effective and enforceable administrative directives, the Arab notable, merchant and effendi classes (Arab property owners) were not able to acquire land without any restrictions. Those who had significant land holdings were able to preserve their social status and local political influence. At the same time, “the dominant and domineering position the effendi classes enjoyed over many fellaheen…began to erode severely in the early 1930s when the inflow of Jewish capital into Palestine reached all-time highs. Land once inviolable became a fair-market item. “ Once the effendis no longer had the economic resources or access to the British bureaucracy, they were not in position to bid on any existing or unoccupied land. In order to sustain their economic standards of living and maintain their local political status during the period of the Mandate, the Arab notables began progressively selling land for capital. [4]
Of the 89 members elected to the Arab Executive (Palestinian nationalist umbrella group founded in 1920), between 1920 and June 1928, “at least one-quarter were identified, personally or through immediate family members, as having directly participated in land sales to Jews.” Of the forty-eight members of the Arab Executive in attendance at the Seventh Arab Congress in June 1928, at least fourteen had by that date been involved in land sales. Members of the various Palestine Arab delegations to London in 1921, 1929, 1930, and 1939 appear to have been deeply involved in the land-sale process. For many of the individuals that reality did not preclude a previous or subsequent hostility to land sales. Zionists did not disclose information to the British about the sales, since the sellers might be participants in future transactions. [5]
In the Palestinian Arab community, efforts in 1931-1932 to raise funds to buy lands from potential Arab sellers to Jews to deflect those sales to Jewish buyers proved a non-starter. In the early 1930s when the British attempted to find out how extensive Arab land sales to Jews had become to determine how many Arabs had been made landless by Jewish purchase, “the British High Commissioner and his staff were stone-walled by Arab notables in providing such a list.” [6]
On land sold by Jamal-el Husseini, a member of the Gaza branch of the el-Husseini family, kibbutz Kefar-Menachem was established. In a letter to the Palestine Land Development Company on October 4, 1937, he asked that the mortgage be released on the portion of the land not sold to the Jews, acknowledging that the sellers had completely fulfilled their obligation. Another 120 dunam was purchased from the el-Husseini family to settle with the Arab tenant farmers still living on the land. [7] Fahmi el-Husseini, the mayor of Gaza, amassed and sold considerable tracts of land to the Jewish National Fund. Kibbutz Beeri was established on this land during the first week in October 1946.
Other members of the el-Husseini family sold land as well: Ismail Bey el-Husseini near Petah Tikvah to the Jewish National Fund; Jamal el -Husseini in Idhniba; Tawfik el-Husseini, Jamal’s brother and one of the founders of the Arab nationalist youth organization, sold his share owned together with Musa Alami; and the sons of Mussa Khasem el-Husseini, Chairman of the Arab Executive. [8]
The prominent Nashashibi family of Jerusalem were also involved in selling land to Jews. Jaduth Nashashibi, a member of the Arab Executive, sold his land in the village of Dileb to the Jewish National Fund before World War I, which is now Kibbutz Kiryat-Anavim. His partner in the sale was Nusseiba Zaki of Jerusalem, who was also a member of the Arab Executive. Ragheb al-Nashashibi, the Mayor of Jerusalem from 1920—1934, a founder of the “National Defense Party” and a member of the Arab Higher Committee since 1936, sold land on Mt. Scopus to The Hebrew University. During WWII, Ragheb attempted to sell his land in the village of Yalo, but since the asking price was so high, the sale did not occur. [9]
Even Arabs who participated in attacks against Jews sold their land to them: in Hadera in May 1921, led the assault in the 1921 riots in Petah-Tikvah, became an agitator of the 1921 riots in Jaffa; participated in the 1929 disturbances, was arrested, and later exiled to the Seychelles Island in 1937; became one of the organizers of the 1936-1939 riots; provided funds for a terrorist leader in the 1936 riots. [10]
Most of the large landowners in Palestine were in the Arab nationalist movement. Some families were selling land to Jews for three generations, even though the younger family members understood Zionist goals and openly opposed them. In other families, some members were in politics and communal activities, while others were in business including administering to real property the family owned together. In these situations, politicians could vigorously insist the sale of land to Jews be prohibited, while their ownership in property could be sold profitably to Jews. Some politicians concealed their dealings through multiple transfers of title to fictitious agents, so their names did not appear on any official documents. Still there are sufficient well-documented records of nationalist public notables who sold land to Jews to prove that they were trying to have both ways. They eagerly sought the economic rewards Zionism generated but did not want a state with Jews or Zionists. [11]
Selling Land: A Well-Known Fact
The Arab community clearly knew their leaders were selling land to Jews, even though the leadership attempted to suppress the facts. The “disparity” between the public protests against selling land and individual Arab transactions could not be discounted. Akram Zu‘itar, a journalist, educator and a well-known activist on the national scene, explained in his diary how the problem was “becoming and more severe… the son of the mayor of Tulkarem is deeply involved in land speculation, and there is no one who will cast stones at him, much less open fire on him. A member of the Supreme Muslim Council sells land to Jews and remains a respected personage, Tulkarem is full of land brokers, and Haifa city elders make deals with Jews , and the same is true in Gaza and Beersheva. How many senior government officials who in the name of Arab nationalism and help make land deals easier, and so far, not a single land broker[simar] was boycotted, even though they ought to get the death penalty…. G-d will not bless the land brokers, nor the nation that does not strike them down.” [12]
This became a public issue when Lewis French, the first director of the British Mandatory Governments Department of Development, wrote in a memorandum to British Government revealing that some members of the Moslem Supreme Council (SMC) had sold land to Jews and that Arab leaders did not oppose selling surplus land to them. In response to the Arab press’ insistence on printing the seller’s names, the Arab Executive convened a special meeting to assess the demand. The names were never published after many members refused to attend and ultimately the Executive stopped functioning completely. The political leadership reorganized only after the 1936 Arab riots began. [13]
“The Spirit of the Nation”
Though the press did not publish the names of the sellers because of family and political connections, they did allude to the practice and warned against it. Significantly, the term simar (plural samasirah) became an insult. As a result of the backing of the press, the public began to accept the use of violence against the offenders as justifiable. (Cohen, op.cit. 47.) The campaign by the press, the mufti, the religious establishment as well as a national poets and intellectuals to ensure the public internalized that selling land to Jews “was an unpardonable religious and national sin” succeeded on one level, and failed on another. A very genuine fear of being stripped of their property for having engaged in such real estate transactions as a result of religious decrees and nationalist ideals had been instilled in the population. Being eternally marked as sinners further confirmed the need to repudiate all land sales.
All of these efforts did not stop the sales. After an Arab sold land in the village of Lifta, just west of Jerusalem, in November 1934, he was assaulted by Arab nationalists. This showed that not everyone acknowledged the authority of the national institutions, and that the nationalists were ready to punish anyone who dared violate this unforgiveable sin. [14]
Footnotes
[1] Kenneth W. Stein, The Land Question in Palestine, 1917—1939 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.), 32, 37 70; Hillel Cohen, Army of Shadows: Palestinian Collaboration with Zionism, 1917–1948 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008),173.
[2] Benny Morris, Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-1998 (New York: Vintage, 2001), 123.
[3] Stein, op. cit. 212,216.
[4] Stein, op.cit. 216, see also 30,33, 213.
[5] Kenneth W. Stein, “Zionist Land Acquisition: a core element in establishing Israel,” https://ismi.emory.edu/documents/Zionist%20Land%20 Aquisition.pdf, 12.
[6] Stein, op.cit.12, for a “Partial List of Palestinian Arab Politicians and Notables Involved in Land Transfers to Jews, 1918-45,” Stein, “The Land Question in Palestine,” op.cit. Appendix 3, 228-239.
[7] Arieh L. Avneri, The Claim of Dispossession: Jewish Land Settlement and the Arabs 1878-1948 (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 2006), 219-220.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid. 230-231.
[10] Ibid. 227-230.
[11] Ibid.227-231; Stein, The Land Question in Palestine, 1917—1939 op.cit. 228-238.
[12] Cohen, op.cit. 47.
[13] Avneri, op.cit. 44, 223-234.
[14] Cohen, op.cit. 50.
The Democrats throw the Jews under the bus BENJAMIN KERSTEIN
In the face of this betrayal, American Jews must look to their own self-defense.
SEP 16, 2025
The news that New York Governor Kathy Hochul has endorsed antisemitic New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, paving the way for the national Democratic leadership to do so, did not get enormous news coverage, but it marks a turning point.
Put simply, the Democrats have officially thrown the Jews under the bus.
There have long been intimations that this was coming. Antisemites like Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, along with fellow travelers like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, have been infecting the party for years.
But to at least some extent, the national leadership kept them at a slight distance, hoping they would not define the party itself. Antisemitism remained a red line. It was blurred at times, but the line was there.
This is no longer the case. The embrace of an antisemite like Mamdani, who refuses to disavow the “globalize the intifada” slogan to kill all Jews and helped found a chapter of the racist hate group Students for Justice in Palestine, proves that antisemitism is no longer a red line. The line does not exist at all.
The dominoes fall
To an extent, it is surprising how quickly the dominoes fell. The process began in earnest on Oct. 8, 2023, when the Democrats’ leftist and Muslim base turned out in droves to celebrate the Oct. 7 massacre in southern Israel.
The “free Palestine” mob’s dedication to the genocidal Palestinian cause has only increased since then, and to fend it off, mainstream Democrats would have had to mount a serious internal fight at some political cost.
It would have been a fight worth having, and much to their credit, but it was clearly too much for them to contemplate. With a few noble exceptions, the mainstream leadership has folded, and the surrender is all but complete. It is now clear that the Democratic Party has no particular problem with people who want to kill Jews.
The party does not seem much interested in what the Jews think about this, which only underlines how remarkably complete the collapse has been.
The reason is that the Jews have given everything to the Democrats for decades, if not a century: Their votes, their money, their passionate loyalty, their time, their energy, even their love. It took less than two years, however, for the Democrats to throw them under the bus the minute it became politically expedient to do so.
Historically speaking, this is par for the course. We are seeing an ancient phenomenon at work: They take our stuff and then spit in our faces. For centuries, antisemites have been happy to exploit the Jewish community and then, when the time comes, eat them alive. That it is happening again should not be a surprise.
Yet, I think it is a surprise for most American Jews, and some remain in denial that it has happened at all.
The umbilical Democrat
Many are puzzled by the Jews’ umbilical relationship with the Democrats, though perhaps they shouldn’t be. Judaism is essentially a communitarian religion, which leaves secular Jews very vulnerable to the appeal of left-wing and liberal politics.
Moreover, America is the only country where the liberal and Reform Judaism imported from Central Europe survived and thrived, which only reinforced the delusion that the Jews have “no enemies to the left.”
The Democrats have also been very adept at exploiting Jewish fears in order to keep them in the fold. Every election, the party unleashes horror stories of right-wing antisemites, fundamentalist Christians, and other innumerable monsters supposedly coming for the Jews, with only the party standing in their way. Due to the collective memory of the European legacy of Christian and right-wing antisemitism, this has been highly effective.
Now, of course, it is only ironic, because just as in Europe, the Bolsheviks have proven to be just as antisemitic as the tsar. The Cossacks are coming from a very unexpected quarter.
Perhaps some Jews remain in denial of this because of its most terrible implication: The Democrats’ betrayal of the Jews is not just a matter of moral bankruptcy—though it is that. It is also a sign that, in America, for the first time since the 1930s, antisemitism is popular. In fact, in certain circles, it has become the sole motivating force of political action and, in some ways, existence itself.
Despite the Democrats’ constant preening, they are politicians, and politicians are not creatures of great moral integrity. If there are votes to be had in hating the Jews, the Democrats will go after them. If the voice of the people ceases to be the voice of God and becomes the voice of the devil, most Democrats will heed it all the same. And indeed, they have now done so. Such is the measure of their hypocrisy.
To the barricades
This leaves open the question of what American Jews should do now. Obviously, defection is an option. At the moment, the Republican Party remains largely philo-Semitic, and Jews may yet find a home there. But there are ominous implications that this too may be changing, and when antisemitism becomes popular in a democracy, no party can be completely trusted.
Given this, the best option is for American Jews to look to their own defenses. The Jews must go to the barricades.
They must take a long, hard look at where they are and how they got here. They must admit that the old guardians are no longer there. To a great extent, the Jews are on their own, and therefore their first priority is and must be self-defense.
That is, the Jews must secure a future for themselves by themselves. No one will protect them anymore, so they must protect themselves. Jewish bodies and Jewish minds must be secured by Jews. Antisemites must be fended off and, if possible, marginalized by the Jews themselves.
How this is to be done is the great question that American Jews have yet to fully ask themselves. My personal view is that a national self-defense organization ought to be founded. Jews should be trained, organized, and led to defend themselves and their own communities against the Cossacks from the left or the right.
For American Jews, this will require a long and difficult struggle, the overturning of decades if not centuries of accumulated quiescence. But the struggle is upon them, whether they like it or not, and it must be joined.
Perhaps, in the end, this is a good thing. It is high time for American Jews to stand up for themselves by themselves. To take their allies where they can find them, rather than relying on fair-weather friends who can always betray them whenever it is convenient to do so. To take their destiny into their own hands.
This, and this alone, is the good that can be drawn from the monstrous betrayal that has now been visited on a community that has been so loyal, for so long, to those who do not and never did love them.
Every time the Arabs try to isolate Israel, it backfires. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
The more they try to push the Jewish state out, the stronger it gets.
SEP 16, 2025 The Future of Jewish
According to a Monday report in The Jerusalem post, which cited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel faces mounting isolation in the international arena.
Qatar is reportedly leading an effort to form a coalition of states to impose a blockade on Israel, hoping to squeeze the Jewish state diplomatically and economically.
Netanyahu responded with a message that is as much a warning to Israel’s enemies as it is a reassurance to Israelis themselves: In the coming years, Israel will rely more heavily on its own strength. That means strengthening its independent arms industries, expanding munitions production, and boosting industrial capacity.
To outsiders, the prospect of Israel standing alone may seem daunting. To Israelis, it is nothing new. Time and again, Jews in the Land of Israel have faced attempts at strangulation and sabotage. Time and again, they have turned adversity into ingenuity.
Consider the Ayalon Institute, one of the most remarkable stories from Israel’s pre-state years. In the 1940s, when British Mandate authorities forbade Jews from manufacturing weapons, the Haganah Jewish resistance movement built an underground bullet factory beneath a kibbutz in central Israel.
Above ground, it appeared to be a peaceful agricultural community with a laundry and bakery. Below ground, hidden under the noise of the washing machines, workers produced more than two million bullets for Sten submachine guns. This clandestine operation, disguised in plain sight, supplied the weapons that would help win the State of Israel’s War of Independence.
This was not an isolated case. Throughout its history, Israel has survived and thrived under siege. When Arab states imposed boycotts and blockades in the 1950s and 1960s, Israel built up its domestic industries. It developed a world-class agricultural sector, pioneering drip irrigation that is now used globally to conserve water. It turned desert soil into farmland and became a net exporter of produce. The same determination fueled its high-tech defense sector. Denied easy access to foreign arms, Israel created the Uzi submachine gun, the Merkava tank, and the Iron Dome missile defense system — each a symbol of self-reliance born out of necessity.
Attempts to isolate Israel have not been limited to the battlefield or the arms market. Arab states tried to choke off Israel economically with the Arab League boycott, which pressured international corporations not to trade with Israel. It failed. Today Israel is a hub of innovation, home to more startups per capita than any other country. Companies like Intel, Google, Apple, and Microsoft all have major research centers in Israel, despite decades of boycott efforts.
And even beyond technology, Israel has become a model of national self-reliance in ways that make a potential blockade look almost laughable. Once plagued by chronic water shortages, Israel is now water-independent thanks to desalination and water recycling technologies, with some of the largest desalination plants in the world. It is exporting its water expertise to parched regions on nearly every continent.
Once dependent on costly energy imports, Israel’s discovery of the Tamar and Leviathan natural gas fields has turned it into a net exporter of energy, supplying its neighbors and building an energy corridor to Europe. In cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and biotech, Israel has positioned itself not as a supplicant to the world, but as an indispensable partner that others cannot afford to ignore.
History teaches that these efforts to strangle Israel are not new but simply another verse in an old song. The Jewish People have endured exiles, expulsions, pogroms, and centuries of oppression designed to break them. Babylon destroyed the First Temple, Rome destroyed the Second, Spain expelled its Jews in 1492, and Europe nearly annihilated them in the 20th century. Each time, Jews rebuilt. Each time, they carried their story forward. The State of Israel is the greatest testament to that resilience. Today’s threats of blockade echo the past, but the result will be the same.
And it must be said plainly: The current effort to isolate Israel is the modern equivalent of trying to push Jews out of society altogether. The rhetoric may be different, the methods more subtle, but the impulse is identical. For centuries, the world told Jews: “You do not belong.” Today, Israel is told: “You do not belong among nations.” We know where that story ends, and the Jewish People refuse to replay it.
The futility of such isolation was summed up best in a conversation I recently had with a teenage American Zionist. She asked me, “What should I do with friends who don’t want to associate with me anymore?” I told her the truth: “They can go f*ck themselves. It’s their loss, not yours.”
Jews are perfectly capable of fending for ourselves. We built our own universities, country clubs, hospitals, newspapers, banks, and neighborhoods when others slammed every other door in our faces. Whenever others tried to lock us out, we simply built our own front door — stronger, sturdier, and more enduring. Our attitude should be that our presence enriches any community or nation, and it is they who should seek our participation, not the other way around.
The same is true with Israel. No country in the world brings more value pound for pound to its relationships than Israelis. For another country to sever ties with Israel is not to punish Israel, but to deprive itself of one of the most dynamic sources of innovation, intelligence, and progress on the planet. To isolate Israel is not only immoral; it is a form of self-harm. It is to shoot yourself in the foot while pretending you’ve struck a blow at someone else.
There is also a deep irony in these blockades. Every time Israel’s enemies try to “cut it off,” they inadvertently accelerate Israel’s innovation. The Arab boycott in the mid-20th century produced drip irrigation and agricultural breakthroughs. The arms embargo forced the creation of Israel’s domestic weapons industry. Terrorism led to the Iron Dome. Each external attempt to deny Israel only compels Israelis to out-think, out-build, and outlast their adversaries.
Builders always outlast destroyers.
At the same time, Israel is not truly isolated, no matter what its detractors claim. While some nations posture against it, others are moving closer. India, Greece, Cyprus, parts of Africa, Eastern Europe, and even segments of Latin America are deepening ties with Israel in trade, energy, and security.
And Israel’s strength does not come from governments alone. The global Jewish diaspora has always been an engine of support, from philanthropy to investment to political advocacy. Even if governments waver, Jews worldwide step up. Israel may act independently, but it never stands alone.
The truth is that Israelis have never had the luxury of depending on the goodwill of others. From the moment our modern state was declared, survival depended on the willingness to innovate, adapt, and fight alone if necessary. The Ayalon Institute is just one example, but it represents a deeper truth about Israeli resilience: the ability to create life where others seek to impose death, to manufacture hope under the cover of despair, to build quietly while enemies conspire loudly.
The Arabs have tried invasion, terrorism, boycotts, propaganda wars, and now, a coordinated diplomatic blockade. Each time, they have failed. Each time, Israel has emerged stronger.
The late Abba Eban, Israel’s legendary diplomat, once quipped that “the Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” His words echo just as loudly today. At a moment when Arab leaders could rise above Hamas, condemn its barbarity, and chart a path toward a better future for their people, they instead fall back on the same tired playbook: blaming and attacking Israel. Rather than breaking with terrorism, they align with it. Rather than seizing the chance to move the region forward, they double down on a strategy that has failed for nearly a century.
Instead of saying clearly that Hamas is the obstacle to Palestinian prosperity and regional peace, Arab states rally at the United Nations to isolate Israel, as if punishing the one country that has consistently built, innovated, and survived will bring stability.
This is the tragic irony Eban warned of. Every time Arabs have chosen rejection over reconciliation, they have condemned themselves to stagnation while Israel advanced. From 1947, when they rejected the UN partition plan, to 1967, when they declared “no peace, no recognition, no negotiations,” to today, when they refuse to confront Hamas but try to blockade Israel, the pattern is unchanged. And so, too, will be the outcome.
Meanwhile, if history is any guide, Israelis themselves will dismiss these latest threats with a Hebrew phrase that captures our national ethos: katan alecha — loosely translating to “no big deal.” It is the shrug of a people who have endured worse, overcome more, and outlasted all who swore they would vanish. That is how Israelis will view this effort to isolate them — not as an existential danger, but as a nuisance, one more obstacle that will be turned into another chapter of resilience.
Make no mistake: Israelis are pining to get back to producing our own weapons. Not because we seek war, but because necessity has always been the mother of our ingenuity. If other countries think a new blockade will weaken Israel, it misunderstands us entirely. Israelis embrace the challenge, because defeating those who declare themselves our enemies has become not just routine, but a national expectation.
Part of what makes Israelis so innovative is what they experience in the army. Service is mandatory, not because Israelis love the military, but because our enemies refuse to live in peace with us. Every young Israeli, whether in combat, intelligence, or technology units, learns to think creatively under pressure, to solve problems quickly, to innovate with limited resources, and to deal with highly complex real-world issues at such a young age. That culture of resilience and resourcefulness feeds directly into Israel’s economy, its universities, and its culture.
Mandatory service, born of necessity, has become one of Israel’s greatest advantages. It is no coincidence that Unit 8200 veterans lead some of the most important cybersecurity firms in the world, or that battlefield improvisation has given rise to medical devices, apps, and agricultural technologies now used globally.
What began as a survival mechanism has become a national engine of creativity. And the same will happen with this so-called “blockade.” What Israel’s adversaries intend as a constraint will end up generating the very innovations that make Israel stronger and more indispensable.
The coming years may indeed bring more isolation. But history has already written the answer. Israelis will be just fine on their own.
[Ed.:
An Explanatory Memorandum: From the Archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in America
May 25, 2013 Center For Security Policy | CSP Press
This memo constitutes a Rosetta stone for the Muslim Brotherhood, its goals, modus operandi and infrastructure in America. It is arguably the single most important vehicle for understanding a secretive organization and should, therefore, be considered required reading for policy-makers and the public, alike.
We at the Center for Security Policy feel it is important for Americans to better understand– and, then, be able to successfully contend with– those that attempt to destroy or subvert our way of life. As making our nation’s enemies’ threat doctrines available is a key part of our educational efforts, we are pleased to present the blueprint for the Muslim Brotherhood in America, known as An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America or, in America’s largest terrorist prosecution in US federal court, Government Exhibit 003-0085 3:04-CR-240-G in U.S. v Holy Land Foundation, et al.
In August of 2004, an alert Maryland Transportation Authority Police officer observed a woman wearing traditional Islamic garb videotaping the support structures of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, and conducted a traffic stop. The driver was Ismail Elbarasse and detained on an outstanding material witness warrant issued in Chicago in connection with fundraising for Hamas.The FBI’s Washington Field Office subsequently executed a search warrant on Elbarasse’s residence in Annandale, Virginia. In the basement of his home, a hidden sub-basement was found; it revealed over 80 banker boxes of the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. One of the most important of these documents made public to date was entered into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation trial. It amounted to the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan for the United States and was entitled, “An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.” The Explanatory Memorandum was written in 1991 by a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America and senior Hamas leader named Mohammed Akram. It had been approved by the Brotherhood’s Shura Council and Organizational Conference and was meant for internal review by the Brothers’ leadership in Egypt. It was certainly not intended for public consumption, particularly in the targeted society: the United States. For these reasons, the memo constitutes a Rosetta stone for the Muslim Brotherhood, its goals, modus operandi and infrastructure in America. It is arguably the single most important vehicle for understanding a secretive organization and should, therefore, be considered required reading for policy-makers and the public, alike.
Another extraordinarily important element of the Memorandum is its attachment. Under the heading “ A List of Our Organizations and Organizations of Our Friends,” Akram helpfully identified 29 groups as Muslim Brotherhood fronts. Many of them are even now, some twenty-two years later, still among the most prominent Muslim- American organizations in the United States. Worryingly, the senior representatives of these groups are routinely identified by U.S. officials as “leaders” of the Muslim community in this country, to be treated as “partners” in “countering violent extremism” and other outreach initiatives. Obviously, this list suggests such treatment translates into vehicles for deep penetration of the American government and civil society.
We urge the readers of this pamphlet to share it with others— family members, friends, business associates and most especially those in a position to help adopt policies that will secure our country against the threat posed by shariah and its most effective and aggressive promoters, the Muslim Brotherhood.
More about the Explanatory Memorandum (from Shariah: The Threat to America):
The following Muslim Brotherhood document was entered into evidence in the U.S. v Holy Land Foundation trial, and is a primary source threat document that provides new insights into global jihad organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood. These documents (covered extensively in chapter four) define the structure and outline of domestic jihad threat entities, associated non-governmental organizations and potential terrorist or insurgent support systems. The Memorandum also describes aspects of the global jihad’s strategic information warfare campaign and indications of its structure, reach and activities. It met evidentiary standards to be admissible as evidence in a Federal Court of law .
In the original document, the first 16 pages are in the original Arabic and the second are English translations of the same. It is dated May 22, 1991 and titled “ An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” (Memorandum). The document includes an Attachment 1 that contains “a list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends.”
The Memorandum expressly recognizes the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) as the controlling element of these organizations and expressly identifies the Muslim Brotherhood as the leadership element in implementing the strategic goals. The Memorandum is reproduced here in its official Federal Court translation, as Government Exhibit 003-0085 3:04-CR-240-G in U.S. v Holy Land Foundation, et al. with punctuation, line spacing and spelling intact.
From the Explanatory Memorandum— the Muslim Brotherhood in America in its own words:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
Questions on Charlie’s murder Peggy Tierney
SEP 15, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
This is Part 3 of my report on Charlie’s murder. You can find Part 1 here and Part 2 here.
We are finally getting the first official statements made by members of the Trump administration on Charlie’s murder. First – let’s hear from Kash Patel, the FBI Director.
I transcribed the interview today with Kash so you know the totality of what was said on the record…
Spencer Cox: “Tyler has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating. But, all the people around him are cooperating. We can confirm that his roommate was, indeed, a boyfriend, who is transitioning from male to female and that he is cooperating with authorities.”
Ainsley: “Charlie Kirk’s murder suspect is refusing to cooperate as the FBI discovers new details about his dark digital footprint. Before he makes his first court appearance tomorrow.”
Brian: “FBI director Kash Patel joins us now. I can’t imagine, Mr. Director, how busy you have been, especially Charlie Kirk isn’t just an impactful person. He’s your friend. So I understand that. But, having said that, people are looking to you to find out how big this investigation is going to be. Can you tell us the latest?”
Kash: “Absolutely, and so good to be with you. You are right. My personal feelings and my relationship with Charlie, I have a job to do for the American people and committed to do it for President Trump. We flexed all resources the FBI had and surged multiple air assets as soon as this shooting occurred.
We are cycling in agents, evidence response technicians, and special operators in and out of Utah, cycling evidence back and forth on these FBI planes as soon as we could. So that there was no delay. And what we did, once I got there, along with the deputy on the ground, it was and 5pm local time on September 11th, was walk the entire crime scene, including the route the suspect himself took.”
[NOTE: Patel arrived in Utah some 24+ hours AFTER Charlie was shot – up until that point the investigation in Utah was led by the Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, LOCAL Utah officials and law enforcement and the Salt Lake City FBI office – remember that for later.]
Kash: “There was DNA evidence that could be collected and had been collected, including a screwdriver that was found on the roof top. Also, we went over to the scene – a wooded area where the firearm was discarded. And the firearm had a towel wrapped around it. It’s important. I will get back to that later.
I even walked into the wooded area in the ravine so I knew from my investigative experience what I could bring to the table and what decisions I needed to make.
And having the support of President Trump and the full support of the White House was what we needed for these resources to happen. And I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for [Tyler] – the suspect in custody.”
Lawrence: “We now know that you have the casings for the gun – so you connect the gun to him as well?”
Kash: “We have the DNA on the screwdriver that was found on the roof top and the towel that the firearm was wrapped in. That is being processed by ATF laboratories in Maryland. I believe they will speak to that at a later date when their processing is complete. I wanted to let you know the FBI handled the screwdriver and the towel.”
Lawrence: “I want to get to the 20 members in a group chat. Have they been brought in for questioning and the group chat that we, from our reporting that we are hearing is from after the assassination. Do you have the messages from before the assassination?”
Kash: “Let me take a step back and tell you what we were doing while we were there and how we were led to the suspect. So that this all fits into the puzzle. We, as soon as we learned of the shooting, we were able to, Charlie was shot at 12:23pm local time on September 10th and by 12:39pm local time, local FBI assets were on scene securing the scene.
We launched at 10:00 am, the next day, September 11th, the first [still] images of the suspect. Myself and the deputy arrived at 5:00 pm local time on September 11th.
We decided to have a press conference at 8:00 pm on September 11th where we issued for the first time the FBI-obtained video footage that we received from the surveillance system and new images, enhanced images, that I decided to release immediately to the public because we were working with the public and the media to find this killer.
Shortly after that 8:00 pm release, two hours later, at 10:00 pm local time, the suspect was in custody. Why?
Because the father informed us pursuant to an interview of him that he looked at the video that we released that evening and the enhanced photos and identified the suspect.
That’s how fast the FBI was working to put out information in real time. For comparative sake, the Boston Bombing, the FBI didn’t release images for three days. We knew we didn’t have three days. I made executive decision [when I took over] operational lead it turned out to be the right move. The men and women of the FBI said that’s what we should be doing.”
Ainsley: “We knew when that video was released – we said it here on “Fox & Friends” – someone is going to recognize this person. Because someone is friends with him, his family, someone knows this guy. Those images were crystal clear. Tell us what you know about his background, his childhood, his father who had to turn him in.”
Kash: “I’m sorry i didn’t mean to ignore that last question. Going back to the group chats real quick – more than 20 individuals. This is great point. I want to lay out how this works.
People think we can just get in group chats and immediately find out who is in them. We the FBI are the investigation body supporting multiple prosecutions in ongoing investigations. That’s another point. Our investigation as the FBI is ongoing. There are scores of people in this discord chat room. But we have to effectuate legal process. We have to go out there with search warrants so that if prosecutors want to later use this evidence, it’s not tainted by being illegally obtained.
We, the FBI, are running the investigation on the discord chat group. There are scores of individuals that are going to be spoken to. There are also lots of family members and friends that have already been spoken to.
To say one more point on forensics. We were able to obtain in record time the text message chain between the suspect and live-in [furry transgender] partner as well as other critical cellular information from our task team that analyzes cell phone data towers in the area to pinpoint the locations of the suspect and other individuals he was speaking with.
This is critical information that the FBI processed and got to prosecutors. So they can lawfully use it in a court of law. And our investigation, our interviews continue. We have learned some shocking things when we spoke to his family and friends as well. His family has collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of years.
And he had a text message [was this a text message or a hand-written note that has since been destroyed – that’s very confusing] exchange, where he, the suspect, with another individual in which he claimed that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and he was going to do it because of his hatred for what Charlie stood for. Those are factually accurate investigatory findings by the FBI that we have handed over to the local authorities and the federal authorities to make their prosecutorial decisions.”
Ainsley: “Why didn’t that person that he was talking to, why didn’t that person say something?”
Kash: “That’s a great question. And we don’t have an answer on that just yet. It’s an ongoing investigation.”
Lawrence: “But, you do have an FBI behavioral analysis unit that is there. My sources people within the FBI and outside, that used to to be FBI, tell me that the FBI has been encouraged not to tackle the transgender issue from an ideology standpoint. Have you heard that?Are you tackling that? I know have you only been there rerecently but you can’t have a political slant saying we’re not going to attack differentp olitical ideologies because it’s going to offend someone.”
Kash: “You are absolutely right. That’s why me and the deputy have been quarterbacking this investigation ourselves. There is no one at the FBI that is going to politicize this investigation. There is no one at Quantico or anywhere else that is going to say we are not looking at x or y. We are looking at the facts. That’s why we are releasing the facts in record fashion. If you go back and look at historical cases like Luigi Mangione – and the Boston bombing – how long did it take the bureau to release information to the public? We’re not doing that. Those two man hunts took five days and happened in downtown major metropolitans. Anyone that thinks that the FBI today is not on top of its game and that me and the deputy and our leadership in our Salt Lake City field office and at Quantico is doing anything politically, I’m not having it. And if you are hearing anything else about it, they are lying to you.We are on it.”
Brian: “Two quick questions, one is, it true that what the governor said yesterday that he had a handwritten note that you are looking in now prior to the assassination, did he have a note and the other question is. The person that was texting with him about “I have a shot at taking out Charlie Kirk,” can that person be charged?”
Kash: “I will take those in reverse. The charging decisions are up to our great partners at the department of justice and the attorney general who have been wonderful providing resources during this entire process and we will let them to speak to any charging decisions. We, the FBI are investigating and our investigation is ongoing, we are interviewing dozens and dozens of suspects, subjects, witnesses and the like and continuing to examine forensic cell phone data and analyze that data.
Once why make those findings hand them over to our partners in real time. They will make those decisions.”
Brian: “Did he write a handwritten note before the assassination attempt? That’s what Governor Cox said yesterday. What did that say?”
Kash: “So, what I am able to say is that the written note, we believe, it exists and we have evidence to show what was in that note which is and I’m going to summarize basically saying suspect wrote a note saying “I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.” That note was written before the shooting. Evidence of its existence existed before the shooting was in the location in the suspect’s and partner’s home. But we have since learned that the note, even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note. And we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.”
Lawrence: “According to sources, you weren’t getting some information, you requested photos. And you were being stonewalled. I think it’s important to note there is always some sort oftension between local cops onthe ground and the Feds. They want to handle their own investigation but, of course, an investigation of this magnitude, you have to step in. You have the resources. But can you explain was it the local field office? Was it the state police? What was going on?”
Kash: “The local authorities have been fantastic. The local sheriff, the state PD have been wonderful. I made the decision to surge many resources, to get the information up to me was of the utmost priority. I worked with my team to say hey, there’s not going to be any delays. We are not going to do it way we normally do things. I have to expedite that process. That’s my job. That’s what I thought this case deserved and that’s what this case was rightly calling for. I made the tough calls. I wasn’t criticizing anyone – I just said we need to move faster. I came in and I accelerated that process.”
Lawrence: “Who wasn’t giving you the photos when you requested them quickly and didn’t make it to you? Who denied that order?”
Brian: “24 hours after still looking for the guy I know you posted we got him and then that ended up not being true.”
Kash: “Look, as I stated, I stated in that message that we had a subject. And that we were going to interview him. And we did and he was released. Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment, sure. I do regret putting it out? Absolutely not. I’m trying to be as transparent as possible and give the public information in real-time.”
Brian: “Do you think that guy was part of the plot to distract you while [the real shooter] got away? Do you think there is any connection between two of those people who stood up and acted crazy at that moment?”
Kash: “Well some of these people were taking claims for this horrific act of violence and they had nothing to do with it. Others were working what we call a daisy chain analysis. This is where the cell phone data dumps are so important. We see who talked to who not just in chat rooms. Who texted who? Who was around who? We are using geo-fencing capabilities to map out exactly where individuals were. And then we’re also getting into their personal cell phone information saying were you calling so and so? Were you texting so and so? We know the suspect was communicating with folks. As I have said, that cell phone tower information, you got to get it the right way, with search warrants, with lawful authority so that our prosecutors can use it in court for whatever investigations they decide to prosecute.”
Ainsley: “Kash, is he not saying a word? He is not admitting it? What happens to him? Does he get the death penalty?”
Kash: “I will let the state authorities speak to their investigation can which is ongoing. I think your summary is correct. Based on the information that I have been given, he has not been cooperating in terms of interrogations with our law enforcement officials (in other words – HE HAS NOT CONFESSED.)
That’s what Kash had to say. My biggest takeway from the interview is that the local FBI was NOT releasing information quickly and that Kash stepped in to make it happen. Also, was the note ONLINE or was it handwritten and destroyed – it sounds to me like Kash has NOT seen it. Those are two very different things. Finally, the DNA was found on the towel and the screw driver but has not yet been confirmed on the gun? More questions.
Tomorrow, I will recap MORE official statements from JD Vance, AG Bondi and President Trump so that we are all operating from the same OFFICIAL knowledge base. Then I will cover the details, discrepancies, media lies and missing pieces that I have gathered in the investigation so far.
Before I go, let’s look at the timeline. I THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT.
What’s really happening with Hamas & Qatar. -Dr. Mordechai Kedar/Talkline With Zev Brenner [51:00]
Sep 14, 2025 #hamas #hamasattackisrael #hamasvsisrael
What’s Really Happening with Hamas, Qatar, and the Threat from Egypt
Dr. Mordechai Kedar speaks out on Talkline with Zev Brenner. Dr. Kedar, a leading expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamist movements, served 25 years in IDF military intelligence, specializing in Syria, Arab political discourse, mass media, Islamic groups, and Israeli Arabs. His insights cut through the noise—don’t miss this powerful interview.
‘Progressives’ sound more like Nazis with every passing day. Benjamin Kerstein,
What began as a movement claiming to fight fascism now mirrors its hatred, totalitarianism, and obsession with Jews.
SEP 15, 2025
By now, it should be clear to all Westerners that they are facing something like a neo-Nazi movement in all but name.
This antisemitic movement, led by the Red-Green Alliance between radical Muslims and radical “progressives,” embodies almost all aspects of Nazism. In particular, its sole unifying principle is the supreme Nazi imperative: Kill Jews.
This constitutes a terrible irony. Terrible for obvious reasons, but ironic for another.
Shortly before he committed suicide in his Berlin bunker, Hitler dictated his “political testament.” He blamed the Jews for Germany’s defeat and more or less everything else, continuing to spread his usual fantasies of omnipotent Jewish power even after successfully murdering a third of the Jewish population.
Then, he rendered a dark “prophecy,” saying:
“Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible, whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.”
Jews are not surprised by Hitler’s prediction. Centuries of tradition teach us that Amalek¹ rises again b’kol dor v’dor, “in every generation.”
Nonetheless, the irony of the monster’s “prophecy” is redolent, because the hatred did grow anew, but not from the “ruins.” It rose again from the universities, mosques, faculty lounges, dorms, NGOs, and government and international institutions. It rose from among the “anti-Nazis.”
Many Jews are surprised by this. They cannot fathom how or why Amalek has risen again from among those who most vehemently identify as anti-Nazi; who claim to represent everything Nazism despised and opposed; who perceive themselves as Nazism’s ultimate enemies; who even profess to love the Jews.
Yet here the “anti-Nazis” are, acting very much like Nazis themselves.
The extent to which the Red-Green Alliance’s movement embraces almost every basic principle of Nazism — indeed, all but one — is remarkable.
The first principle is, obviously, antisemitism. The Red-Green Alliance believes that the Jews are not a religion or a people, but a demonic metaphysical force. The Jews, it holds, control, exploit, oppress, and slaughter non-Jews (indeed, the entire world) for the sake of nothing but the Jews’ essentially evil nature.
As such, the Red-Green Alliance believes, the only way to redeem and “liberate” the world is to annihilate the Jews. Killing Jews becomes a sacred act, before which “God is great” or “Free Palestine” must be shrieked. The “intifada” must be globalized until all the Jews are dead “by any means necessary.” Only thus can not only “Palestine” but humanity itself be freed.
The second principle is: Race is everything. Indeed, it is impossible to exaggerate the size and scope of the Red-Green Alliance’s obsession with race, matched in historical terms only by that of the Nazis. The Red-Green Alliance does not simply acknowledge the existence of racism and the need to combat it; instead, it believes that race is the sole defining metaphysical force in the universe. It drives all existence, human and otherwise.
As a result, the Red-Green Alliance views the world through a lens of racial hierarchy, placing Jews and white people at the top and black people and Palestinians at the bottom. It believes this hierarchy should not be dismantled but reversed to achieve what they consider “racial justice” and, implicitly, retribution for past oppression. Essentially, the Red-Green Alliance promotes the concept of a “master race” that substitutes Nazism’s imagined “Aryans” with the Red-Green Alliance’s own concept of the “oppressed.”
The third principle is totalitarianism. The Red-Green Alliance believes that its ideology must influence and control every facet of society, extending even to the individual human soul. This totalitarian approach is evident in the Red-Green Alliance’s strict intolerance of any beliefs other than its own. When confronted with opposing views, no matter how moderate, the Red-Green Alliance suppresses them “by any means necessary,” including the use of mob violence.
The purest expression of this is the Red-Green Alliance’s professoriate regime, which dominates academia. Over decades, the professoriate has established a totalitarian state-within-a-state, lacking gulags only because of insufficient political and material resources. This regime enforces absolute obedience and, through ideological blockade, total uniformity of thought. This makes it easy for the regime to deploy its stormtroopers at will to attack Jews or any other designated enemy.
The final principle is revolutionary suicide. This imperative, most famously articulated by Black Panther leader Huey Newton, urges the “oppressed” to embrace death to advance the revolutionary cause and, in doing so, redeem their own souls from oppression. The Red-Green Alliance is utterly obsessed with revolutionary suicide. This is most obvious in the Islamic faction’s lionization of the suicide bomber.
However, the radical “progressive” faction fully embraces its own cult of martyrs, glorifying its self-immolators and urging them to “rest in power.” It remains utterly committed to the murderous but also self-destructive violence of its criminals and assassins. After all, “by any means necessary,” by definition, includes suicide.
Indeed, given that the Hamas leaders who launched the October 7th massacre must have known that Israel’s retaliatory actions would inevitably lead to their destruction, it is not a surprise that the Red-Green Alliance initially took to the streets not to protest the retaliation but to celebrate the massacre itself.
Although “revolutionary suicide” seems to be a principle of the Left, it was embraced in nascent form by Hitler. The tyrant was perfectly willing to plunge Germany into the abyss for the sake of his “revolution” against the Jews. In his final days, with the Allies advancing and defeat inevitable, Hitler ordered the systematic destruction of his country’s infrastructure — a plan thwarted only by the disobedience of his subordinates — and ultimately committed suicide.
There is only one principle of Nazism that the Red-Green Alliance has, thus far, not embraced: the Fuhrer principle. This belief, also crucial to Italian fascism, holds that the leader is infallible simply by being the leader, and his will is absolute. He must be obeyed in all things, and his word is, by definition, law.
In other words, the Red-Green Alliance has yet to find its Hitler.
We should pray that it does not, because if the Red-Green Alliance can coalesce around a single charismatic leader whom it will obey without question, the consequences will be horrendous in scope. Western Jews, of course, will be in existential danger, but so will all Westerners. Such a leader would be, by definition, a threat to the republic itself. Should they ride a wave of demonic passion to political power, flight for the Jews and civil war for the West could be inevitable.
The origins of the Red-Green Alliance’s Islamic faction’s Nazism are self-evident, yet historians and commentators, who should know better, often overlook them. Political Islam’s founders, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, were inherently supremacist and quickly adopted antisemitism as a fundamental principle. When Nazism emerged as a political movement, they enthusiastically embraced it.
The infamous Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and founder of Palestinian nationalism Hajj Amin al-Husseini was also a passionate Nazi. He actively collaborated with Hitler, supported the Holocaust, and launched a Nazi-inspired pogrom against the Jews of Iraq, which has gone down in collective memory as the Farhud².
Today, honest Palestinian nationalists openly admire Hitler and wish he had “finished the job.” Indeed, I have spoken with people to whom Palestinians and other Arabs and Muslims have explicitly said these exact words. Polls indicate that such sentiments are sadly common in the Arab and Muslim worlds, with some countries showing that upwards of 80 percent of the population is antisemitic.
The radical “progressive” wing of the Red-Green Alliance is a more complex issue, especially since its history of antisemitism has been deliberately concealed.
Nonetheless, antisemitism has been present from the origins of the Left itself. As early as 1847, for example, proto-anarchist philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon wrote that the Jews are a “race that poisons everything by sticking its nose into everything without ever mixing with any other people.” He demanded their “expulsion from France with the exception of those individuals married to French women.”
He further urged: “Abolish synagogues and not admit [the Jews] to any employment. Demand their expulsion. Finally, pursue the abolition of this religion.”
Proudhon’s hate culminated in a call for genocide. He shrieked, “The Jew is the enemy of humankind. They must be sent back to Asia or be exterminated. … The Jew must disappear by steel or by fusion or by expulsion.”
It is not an exaggeration to say that Hitler never articulated his beliefs with any greater honesty or violence. He and Proudhon were kindred spirits.
Karl Marx himself was as antisemitic as Proudhon. Contrary to myth, Marx was not a Jew. He was of Jewish ancestry but a baptized Christian and an atheist by conviction. Nor did he identify in any way with the Jewish people. Quite the opposite: Like Proudhon, he appears to have despised the Jews and viewed them as the metaphysical enemy of mankind.
In a notorious writing later titled “On the Jewish Question,” Marx went so far as to identify the Jews as literal excrement, writing, “The Jew is perpetually created by civil society from its own entrails.” Marx proceeded to spew up a plethora of stereotypes on the subject of Jews and money, writing, “Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist.”
This, Marx elaborated, made the Jews the root of all evil. He wrote: “Money degrades all the gods of man — and turns them into commodities. … It has, therefore, robbed the whole world — both the world of men and nature — of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of man’s work and man’s existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he worships it.”
Thus, in the form of capitalism, Marx’s ultimate enemy, “The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of the world.”
Unlike Proudhon, Marx did not explicitly call for genocide. However, since he identified the Jews with capitalism, and his avowed goal was the destruction of capitalism by revolutionary violence, such a “final solution” is strongly implied.
Like many detrimental things, the origins of today’s “anti-Nazi” Nazism can be traced back to the 1960s Left, particularly the ideologies that reached their zenith during the upheavals of 1968. Indeed, in many ways, the Red-Green Alliance is the way 1968 ends: Not with a bang, but with Nazism.
In his book “The Passion of Joschka Fischer,” dissident leftist Paul Berman, a staunch opponent of Left-wing antisemitism, traces this peculiar evolution from a Left that historically defined itself as an anti-Nazi movement to a Left that, for all practical purposes, became a crypto-Nazi movement. Indeed, the movement’s Nazism was so “crypto” that it was often a secret even to itself.
This process was largely the result of a paranoid conspiracy theory. Berman noted that the animating principle of the 1960s New Left was “a fear, in sum, that in World War II, fascism, and more specifically Nazism, had not been defeated after all — a fear that Nazism, by mutating, had continued to thrive into the 1950s and 1960s and onward, always in new disguises.”
“It was a fear that Nazism had grown into a modern system of industrial rationality geared to irrational goals — a Nazism of racial superstitions committing the same massacres as in the past, a Nazism declaiming a language of democracy and freedom that had no more human content than the old-fashioned rhetoric of Lebensraum and Aryan superiority,” wrote Berman.
“What was New Leftism, then?” he asked. “It was — it pictured itself as — Nazism’s opposite and nemesis: the enemy of the real Nazism, the Nazism that had survived Nazism, the Nazism that was built into the foundations of Western life.”
It is obvious to any thinking person that the New Left’s fantasy was, in every way, quite deranged. Nonetheless, it is absolutely essential to understanding not just the 1960s Left, but today’s radical “progressives.” For example, one of the fundamental principles of faith espoused by the Left’s guru/saint Noam Chomsky was that the United States is a Nazi regime in need of “denazification.”
The claim remains as potent today as ever, as evidenced by the persistent “progressive” allegations that the Republican Party is a Nazi movement and people like George W. Bush and Donald Trump are Hitler.
Today, the derangement has escalated to the point that radical progressives believe that more or less everyone except themselves is a Nazi. Naturally, everyone includes the Jews, except for a few like Bernie Sanders, who are willing to follow radical progressive marching orders.
Given the Left’s suppressed legacy of genocidal antisemitism, it is hardly surprising that this demonology eventually came to fixate on the Jews.
This was not just an ideological but also a historical process. Paul Berman explained:
“The 1967 war, in which the Israelis seized a lot of land, seemed to confirm Israel’s imperialist nature. The Soviets became fierce enemies of Zionism. Palestinian Marxists stepped forward. Soviet resources poured in. And, under those circumstances, the New Left came up with one more interpretation of the Middle Eastern conflict, in which the New Left’s vision of a lingering Nazism of modern life was suddenly reconfigured, with Israel in a leading role.”
In a horrifying inversion, “Israel became the crypto-Nazi site par excellence, the purest of all examples of how Nazism had never been defeated but had instead lingered into the present in ever more cagey forms. What better disguise could Nazism assume than a Jewish state?”
“Israel thus advanced in the New Left imagination into the vanguard of imperialist aggressors, and the Palestinian resistance into the front rank of modern anti-Nazism,” Berman concluded.
We are thus faced with a very remarkable thing: The world’s most prominent heirs of Nazism became, in the minds of the Left, anti-Nazis. The Nazis became “anti-Nazis” and vice versa. Worst of all, the victims of Nazism were declared to be their own murderers. Thus, the Left’s “anti-Nazi” Nazism was born, its hatred as fierce as Proudhon’s demand that the Jews “be sent back to Asia or be exterminated.”
This studied dementia is many things: a monstrous blood libel, world-historical hypocrisy, pure willful insanity, hideous sadism, and, most importantly, an attempt to erase, appropriate, and annihilate Jewish history, identity, and existence.
It is, in other words, Hitler’s “prophecy” made flesh. It is Amalek.
The question, of course, is how to deal with all this.
First, it is essential to follow Hunter S. Thompson’s dictum: “Don’t take any guff from these swine.” That is to say, do not grant the “anti-Nazi” Nazis the slightest legitimacy, the slightest indulgence. Do not argue with or debate them. Do not treat them as if they have any place in public or private discourse. Simply assert that, by definition, they have no moral right to make any argument whatsoever. To grant such a right would be to lose one’s humanity.
More important but also more difficult is to deal with this form of neo-Nazism in the same way as the old Nazism: Smash it completely. In this case, not by saturation bombing, but by using every legal and ethical means to demolish its power to harm others, to marginalize its adherents, to punish its criminality, and to ensure that it is relegated to gated compounds in the middle of nowhere where it can stew forever in its own scorn.
Smashing the “anti-Nazi” Nazis is not just a moral imperative but an existential necessity, and not just for Jews but for all Westerners. If history has proven anything, it is that modern societies cannot survive antisemitism. Once infected, they always end up benighted and backward or in outright “revolutionary suicide.” Haman always hangs. The bullet in the brain is ever Hitler’s end. If it is not careful, the West is unlikely to be any exception to this rule.
No further proof of this danger is needed: The Red-Green Alliance has already infiltrated and corrupted numerous Western institutions. It has engaged in systematic illegality and violence. It has recently decided to turn to outright antisemitic terrorism, and this terrorism will not long remain confined to Jews. The threat of “anti-Nazi” Nazism is clear and absolute.
There can be only one conclusion: If the West wishes to survive, it must send Amalek back to the shadows. It must put the swine back in the pen. And it must do so as quickly as possible. If it does not, we are all in trouble.
Benjamin Kerstein is an Israeli-American writer based in Tel Aviv and Recipient of the 2024 Louis Rapaport Award for Excellence in Commentary from the American Jewish Press Association.
The ‘normie conquest’: Millions just joined the right overnight ROBERT STERLING
A Ukrainian refugee’s murder and Charlie Kirk’s assassination shattered America’s apolitical middle.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2025
My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue. So I am telling you, my liberal friends and leftists everywhere. This is what has happened.
I’m not talking about people who are “online.” I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive-thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues.
These normal, middle-of-the-road, nonpolitical citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics.
Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious. And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left. Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.
I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and — absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine — you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own.
Here are the facts.
1) Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman — a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter — stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over.
2) Two days later, tens of millions of Americans saw on video Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family.
Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept.
3) Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man getting shot in the neck, these same people logged on to Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it but cheering it.
These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are factual statements nevertheless.
Here’s what it means for Democrats reading this: These normal, middle-of-the-road, nonpolitical citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics.
After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families — the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs — depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not. These people are now sprinting — not jogging, not walking, but racing — to the right.
Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened.
When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice.
They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends — their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges — and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter BS.
All BS. Not even smart BS, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ BS. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells.
And they blame you. Because even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their families’ safety.
When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and constantly jokes — “jokes” — about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.”
They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin.
They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep.
And they blame you. Because even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social media struggle sessions has now turned to .30-06 bullet holes.
When these Americans log on to social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst.
These people — whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve — start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person.
And they blame you. Because even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them.
For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but BS.
In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post nonsensical statistics about reductions in reported crime. In reality, anyone who’s been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, and victims do not waste their time reporting it to cops who don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors who seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanors.
In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but nonsensical whataboutism. “What about January 6?” Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares any more.
“What about Paul Pelosi?” That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. Also: Paul who?
“What about regulations on assault rifles?” That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.
In response to teachers, health care workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more BS and misdirection.
“It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.
“I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs — especially their taxpayer-funded jobs — for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.
All BS. Not even smart BS, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ BS. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells. You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it. Because I’m right, and as you reflect on this, you know I’m right.
The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members last week. We have a mandate to ensure that these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do. If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.
Editor’s note: A version of this article appeared as a post on X (formerly Twitter).
RELATED: Charlie Kirk’s assassination ignites global fire: Patriots hold memorials from the UK to South Korea
RELATED: TPUSA plans historic memorial for Charlie Kirk
Rabbi Berel Wein: Recalling his Zionist opposition to the two-state nightmare by MOSHE PHILLIPS
From a new vantage point in Jerusalem, he wrote about the dangers facing Israel and the antisemitism of its enemies.
(Sept. 15, 2025 / JNS)
“The more I read and study Jewish history, the clearer it becomes that there is an Author and Planner, Who guides [the People of] Israel to its destiny.” — Rabbi Berel Wein (October 1990)
Rabbi Berel Wein, a Chicago-born pulpit rabbi and rosh yeshivah, gained widespread recognition within the American Orthodox community for his landmark 1990 history, Triumph of Survival: The Story of the Jews in the Modern Era 1650-1990. He passed away, at the age of 91, on Aug. 16 in Jerusalem, the city he held so close to his heart.
His influence extended well beyond his written works, with his contributions as an educator, author and passionate Zionist shaping the Jewish community for decades. Yet one aspect of his legacy has been notably overlooked in many tributes to his life: his firm opposition to the so-called “two-state solution” for Israel and Palestine.
In 1997, Wein made aliyah, leaving Monsey, N.Y., for Jerusalem at the age of 63. Though many would have retired at this stage in their careers, the rabbi remained as active as ever, continuing to write, teach and speak on issues of Jewish history and Israel.
Trained as a lawyer, his journey into the rabbinate was atypical, though his impact on the Jewish community was unparalleled. His history of the Jewish people became a critical reference point for generations, while his weekly Torah commentaries, published in outlets such as The Jerusalem Post, earned him further recognition.
Wein’s commitment to Israel was rooted in his personal beliefs as well as his understanding of Jewish history. In his 1990 book, Triumph of Survival, he wrote about the rise of Jew-hatred in the post-Auschwitz world, pointing to the U.N. General Assembly’s infamous resolution in 1975 equating Zionism with racism.
He observed, “Thus was antisemitism legitimized in the post-Auschwitz world.”
His opposition to antisemitism was inseparable from his belief in a strong, secure Israel. He viewed the country as not only a refuge for Jews but as the essential foundation for Jewish survival in the modern world.
But it wasn’t only his grasp of history that distinguished him. His views on the contemporary political situation, particularly the threats faced by Israel, were sharp and unwavering. Unlike many American Zionists, Wein took the bold step of moving to the Jewish state, directly engaging with the realities of Israeli security and politics. From his vantage point in Jerusalem, he frequently wrote about the dangers facing Israel and the antisemitism of Zionism’s enemies.
One of Wein’s most striking criticisms was aimed at the hypocrisy he saw in global attitudes toward Israel. In June 2010, following the (first) Gaza flotilla incident, he wrote: “A Jewish member of the United States Congress declared after the Gaza flotilla incident that he was now ashamed of being Jewish. Of course, he, like unfortunately many other Jews, has no real connection to Jewish practice, tradition or behavior.”
Wein saw such statements as emblematic of the deep disconnect between Jewish identity and the political forces that often sought to undermine Israel’s legitimacy.
He also expressed his disillusionment with Israeli politics, particularly regarding the abandonment of Jewish communities in Gaza and the West Bank. In June 2012, he wrote: “We distrust all of our political leaders with equal disdain and doubt their motives and schemes. They betray us on a regular basis—just ask the dispossessed of Gush Katif and now of Beit El.”
For Wein, this loss of Jewish land was not just a political issue; it was a betrayal of Israel’s future and security.
Wein’s opposition to the so-called “two-state solution” was grounded in his understanding of the hatred harbored by the PLO/Fatah leadership that to this day controls the Palestinian Authority. In December 2012, he described the Palestinian Arab political landscape as fragmented and unstable, stating: “(T)he Palestinians … have two governing bodies, one in Gaza ruled by Hamas and the other in portions of the West Bank ruled by Fatah. In spite of all of the trappings of sovereignty, neither entity seems to be interested in or engaged in state-building.”
For Wein, the goal of these entities was not peace or coexistence, but rather the destruction of the State of Israel itself. He warned that the international community, by focusing on a two-state solution, was ignoring the true nature of the threat to Israel’s existence.
The rabbi’s message was clear: Israel’s survival was inextricably linked to the unity of the Jewish people and its territorial integrity, which must include secure borders. He often emphasized that the Jewish future was bound up with the success of the Jewish state. As he wrote in March 2014: “The reality of the existence of the State of Israel and that it is now the home of over 6 million Jews … is completely ignored.”
This stark reality, in his view, required a steadfast commitment to the safety and security of the Jewish people in Israel, regardless of international pressure or political schemes.
The rabbi lived a life marked by a deep faith in God, a love for Jewish history, and an unwavering commitment to the security and future of Israel. His teachings continue to resonate with Jews around the world, and his legacy endures in the hearts and minds of those who followed his work and thought.
May Rabbi Wein’s words inspire and guide us in the years to come, reminding us of the importance of unity, faith and the safety of the Jewish state.
MOSHE PHILLIPS Moshe Phillips, a veteran pro-Israel activist and author, is the national chairman of Americans For a Safe Israel (AFSI). A former board member of the American Zionist Movement, he previously served as national director of the U.S. division of Herut and worked with CAMERA in Philadelphia. He was also a delegate to the 2020 World Zionist Congress and served as editor of The Challenger, the publication of the Tagar Zionist Youth Movement. His op-eds and letters have been widely published in the United States and Israel.
American Blindspots in Mideast Diplomacy Avi Abelow
September 15, 2025 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel
There’s no denying it: U.S.-Israel relations are stronger than ever. During today’s joint press conference in Jerusalem, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and PM Netanyahu made it clear: the U.S. and Israel stand shoulder to shoulder in the fight against terror and for Western civilization.
Rubio didn’t hold back.
– “Hamas cannot remain in Gaza.”
– “They are holding not just Israeli hostages—but all of Gaza.”
– “We warned countries trying to recognize a Palestinian state, Israel will respond.”
Netanyahu echoed that strength:
“There is no safe haven for terrorists.”
“Israel alone decided to strike Hamas leaders in Doha, and we will strike again if needed.”
“If others act unilaterally against us, we will act unilaterally too.”
This wasn’t just talk. Rubio signaled silent support for Israel applying sovereignty over Judea & Samaria, Israel’s ancestral heartland. Finally, moral clarity.
But even with all this alignment, there are three dangerous blind spots in American policy:
Blind Spot #1: Qatar Is Not a Partner, It’s a Patron of Terror
Rubio praised Gulf partnerships but failed to mention that Qatar is the primary enabler of Hamas and the global Muslim Brotherhood movement.
– Qatar funds the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
– Qatar runs Al Jazeera, Islamist propaganda media empire dressed as news.
– Hamas leaders have lived in Doha for years, plotting genocide while sipping espresso and pocketing billions of $ of international aid into their back accounts!
Washington still treats Qatar like a partner. It’s not. It’s an enemy of the West, full stop.
Blind Spot #2: Syria & Lebanon No Longer Exist
Sykes-Picot is dead. Syria and Lebanon are Iranian and Sunni jihadi battlegrounds, not functioning states.
– Israel targets IRGC & Hezbollah in Lebanon.
– We strike jihadists in Syria who’ve ethnically cleansed Christians, Alawites, Druze & Kurds.
– But the U.S. still acts like we’re dealing with real countries.
This fantasy only ties Israel’s hands and helps our enemies.
Blind Spot #3: Gaza is Hamas
Hard truth: Gaza isn’t “held hostage” by Hamas. It is Hamas.
– Polls show massive support for Oct 7.
– “non-combatants” celebrated as our hostages were paraded through the streets of Gaza on Oct. 7th.
– No different from the Arab Muslims under Palestinian Authority rule in Judea & Samaria.
This isn’t about borders. It’s about a radical Islamist ideology, Sunni (Qatar) and Shiite (Iran), waging war against the whole free world. Israel is just the frontline of this battle.
Until the West confronts that truth, the bloodshed will continue, everywhere. And it hasn’t even begun in Europe or the USA…
Conclusion: Let Israel Win. That’s America First
A strong, independent Israel that eliminates jihadist terror is not just good for Israelis, it’s good for Americans.
– No U.S. boots on the ground.
– A trusted ally securing the world’s toughest region.
– Freeing up the U.S. to deal with more direct strategic threats, like China and the global economic war.
America First? That includes the U.S. letting Israel do what must be done, to also protect America.
– Total defeat of Hamas with total victory
– Implement Trump’s Gaza emigration plan
– Apply sovereignty in Judea & Samaria
– Defend minority populations in Syria & Lebanon
– No illusions. No micromanagement. Just victory.
Let Israel win.
Let us be your forward base of freedom in the Middle East.
No immunity for terrorists, in Rafah, Ramallah, or in Doha.
The sooner America wakes up to these blind spots, the safer we all will be.
Until that time, we still must be eternally grateful to President Trump and his administration for all of their support in this war. Under a Kamala Harris administration we would have been under a U.S. arms embargo as President Biden implemented when he was President.
Every Jew, and lover of freedom in the world, must thank God that Trump became President!!!
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
Generation Remigration by Linda Goudsmit
The Reclamation of Western Civilization
September 14, 2025
In an extraordinary moment in the history of Western civilization, two defining events happened––the assassination of Charlie Kirk in the United States on September 10, 2025, and Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally in England on September 13, 2025. These two momentous events bookended the 24th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, Islamic attack on the United States of America killing 3,000 innocents.
These seemingly unrelated events are, in fact, intimately connected.
Consider the fact that before the United States of America, political power was shared between religion and state in every nation in the world. The United States of America is the greatest experiment in individual freedom the world has ever known because it separated church (religion) and state (government), specifically limited government power, and formalized the inalienable individual rights of its citizens. The United States of America broke the historical binary mold of rulers and ruled when our founding fathers created a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people––and created an upwardly mobile middle class.
American patriots have fought for our national sovereignty and individual freedom since our founding, and American patriots continue to fight to preserve our constitutional republic, while the enemies of freedom continue to try to restrict our most basic freedom––freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech there are no other freedoms. Today we are a world at war: Globalism vs Nationalism.
In a familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalist elite social engineers are fomenting divisiveness in America because a house divided cannot stand. The globalist elite fund and foment the anti-American policies of the radical leftist Democrats including destruction of the family; destruction of children’s innocence; destruction of the middle-class; open borders; DEI; and Marxist collectivist indoctrination in American schools. The political objective is to create divisiveness that weaken America from within. Conflict between black/white, gay/straight, rich/poor, male/female, old/young, capitalism/socialism, individualism/collectivism, Judeo-Christian/Muslim, and Jew/Christian divisiveness are all intentionally exacerbated and exploited to weaken America.
President Donald Trump stands diametrically opposed to the anti-American policies of leftist Democrat past presidents Obama and Biden. President Trump is committed to his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda and its signature pro-American positions and policies which include eliminating the Obama/Biden legacy of destructive policies one-by-one.
Charlie Kirk founded the American nonprofit organization Turning Point USA in 2012 and advocated for conservative values and politics to students on high school, college, and university campuses across the nation. He spoke directly with indoctrinated students to help them see the fallacies and lies of the leftist/Marxist Utopia they were being promised.
Charlie Kirk, thirty-one years old, married, and father of two young children, was assassinated on September 10, 2025. He was the shining young face of Make America Great Again (MAGA), a champion of free speech, and the future of the populist MAGA movement. Charlie Kirk was the existential enemy of the globalist elite who are supporting the Red (Marxist, radical leftist Democrats) Green (Islamist) alliance to create chaos and collapse America from within––and Charlie Kirk was assassinated for it. The opening paragraph of all forty-five chapters of my latest book, Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is (2024), begin with a warning that explains the horrific political murder of Charlie Kirk:
Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite. The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of objective reality into the madness of subjective reality. America’s children are the primary target of the globalist predators.
Charlie Kirk was unraveling and exposing the lies of globalism’s anti-American Red/Green leftist/Islamist policies that students on college campuses were being indoctrinated with. In an information war of weaponized education, Charlie Kirk’s “Prove Me Wrong” challenges marked a turning point for legions of American students, who left the Left and embraced Charlie Kirk’s patriotism and American nationalism. His assassination marked a turning point in American history.
In Britain, the populist powerhouse Tommy Robinson organized the largest protest in British history––the September 13th Unite the Kingdom rally––which was attended and viewed by millions of people around the world. The rally was a call to stand up for free speech and oppose government censorship; oppose two-tier policing; oppose massive uncontrolled immigration; and promote British unity. The rally was a forum to publicly and proudly unite England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland––the constituent countries of the British Kingdom––and preserve their national identity, national sovereignty, national culture, and the Judeo-Christian tradition that is the infrastructure of Western civilization. The rally was a direct challenge to the destructive divide-and-conquer strategy of the globalist elite and its leftist puppets.
Charlie Kirk was an ardent American supporter of Britain’s Tommy Robinson. Signs with Charlie Kirk’s face on one side and a family photo on the other honored Charlie Kirk’s commitment to freedom of speech, which supports the Judeo-Christian values of family, faith, and flag. British flags from around the kingdom including historic Christian flags from the Crusades were flying everywhere. Free speech speakers from around the world gathered in person and by video feed to support the free speech movement to voice their national pride; to express opposition to globalism’s leftist open borders policies; and to support the nascent Generation Remigration movement.
A new word in the political lexicon was introduced––remigration is the repatriation of foreigners back to their country of origin. Eva Vlaardingerbroek, the 28-year-old Dutch political commentator who spoke at the rally, was wearing a black t-shirt with the words GENERATION REMIGRATION unapologetically printed across the front in bold white letters. It was a clear message that defined a new generation of young activists who openly reject globalism’s leftist population replacement strategies and unapologetically reject the globalist status quo in England that protects Muslim rape gangs at the expense of little British schoolgirls. Then Eva said the unsayable, that Muslim immigrants with hostile norms are raping British children not just in Rotterdam, but all over England, and the government’s anti-British policies are unacceptable!
Eva Vlaardingerbroek’s impassioned voice is a stark contrast to Gen Z’s leftism. Eva spoke of national pride in Western culture and referred to venerated Saint George, the Roman soldier who was sentenced to death for refusing to recant his Christian faith and then elevated to sainthood. Eva’s remarks acknowledge the significance of religious divisiveness in globalism’s war on nation-states. Western nations have been deliberately plunged into a 21st-century religious war between invading Muslim populations whose hostile norms conflict with the host country’s Western Judeo-Christian norms. This inconvenient fact is foundational to the Generation Remigration movement.
Open borders is a humanitarian hoax designed to obliterate national identities by flooding countries with replacement populations, because demography is destiny. Globalism is a replacement ideology, and its incremental progress is toward establishment of the globalist elite’s dystopian world government, where individual and national sovereignty is replaced with planetary feudalism. Only by acknowledging that we are a world at war and that open border policies are tactical maneuvers in globalism’s War on Nationalism, can we protect our citizens and our national sovereignty.
In a particularly moving moment in the Unite the Kingdom rally, Elon Musk stated the simple truth that the incentive for open borders is to import voters for the policies the Left cannot sell to its native British population. He states unapologetically that Britain must remain Britain. He describes the erosion of Britain through massive uncontrolled migration, and a failure by the government to protect its British citizens, particularly its children who are being brutally raped. Freedom of speech is essential to a free society, it is the essence of democracy, and the British government is a government against the people––not for the people. The British government must protect the British people, especially the children. The BBC is complicit in the destruction of Britain. It is unfair and it is wrong. There must be a change of government in Britain––a dissolution of Parliament and a new vote. The message must get to the people––if they don’t act, other people will come and maraud them––a dissolution of their entire way of life. London is the example of lawless social collapse. The Left is the party of violence and murder and celebrating murder. It must stop! The message from Elon Musk is to the reasonable center––the people of common sense. He warns that if this continues, the violence will come to you. Whether you choose it or not, the violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die. Musk concludes by saying that if the people of Britain take charge and have a government that represents British interests instead of foreign interests, then Britain has a great future. But it requires revolutionary government change for that to occur. It requires marshalling the people to make change. We must fight for the future––but there is not much time left.
The ideological connections between Charlie Kirk, 9/11, Tommy Robinson, President Trump, Eva Vlaardingerbroek, and Elon Musk all intersect in globalism’s war on nation-states. Words matter, and the leftist word perverters would have you believe that nationalism is fascism––it isn’t! Nationalism is a word that means identification with one’s own nation and support for its interests. Whether nationalism is used to support fascism or freedom is a matter of that nation’s government. The Left has shown itself to be the political party of violence and political murder. The Left has also shown itself to be the political party of the globalist elite, who fund leftist candidates to impose catastrophic policies like open borders to collapse nation-states from within.
The irony, of course, is that those who participate in the unholy red/green leftist/Islamist alliance are just useful idiots for the globalist elite in whatever country they are operational. Why do I say this? Because globalism is a replacement ideology that will eliminate the agitators in the red/green alliance the moment their usefulness expires. Globalism’s end game is the imposition of its own planetary, totalitarian, feudal Unistate.
Now is the time for freedom loving patriots to speak up and speak out against globalism’s war on nation-states because united we stand and divided we fall. We the people of the Judeo-Christian tradition must unite and stand together in solidarity today so that Generation Remigration can reclaim Western civilization and a future of freedom.
Follow the money Peggy Tierney
SEP 14, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
DEVIN NUNES: “You gotta follow the money.”
Devin Nunes told Maria today that Kash Patel & the FBI need to follow the money to uncover the “very sophisticated organization” – possibly tied to George Soros and other left-wing billionaires – who are responsible for Charlie’s death and all the political violence we are seeing in America.
Devin Nunes basically confirmed this violence isn’t being perpetrated by a random group of perverts on the Dark Web – it’s being created and funded and executed by evil puppet masters.
DEVIN NUNES: “For years, Antifa Communists were allowed to roam free, burning down buildings, going into blue cities, creating chaos and the old FBI never did anything about it.”
[Now they’re grooming teenagers and creating “trans” murderers on the Dark Web and through brainwashing programs like MKUltra to carry on the violence…]
DEVIN NUNES: “Kash Patel, the new Director of the FBI, has so much to clean up – there’s so much history here. The radical left in this country have been trying to kill conservatives now for going on eight years.
My colleague, Steve Scalise, and many other conservatives have been gunned down. President Trump was shot at twice, nearly killed. And finally, they got Charlie Kirk.
This violence has to end. It’s the political left doing this. It’s nonsense to say it’s both sides and we need to lower the “rhetoric.”
The rhetoric was started by my former [Democrat] colleagues in Congress!
It is also done and supported by a very sophisticated organization. Many people say Soros, but it’s not just Soros who helps to organize this. Soros works in conjunction with the Democratic National Committee and other foundations (NGOs) to support these radical groups across the country that has led to this unprecedented historical violence.”
MARCO RUBIO: “Several organizations tied to Neville Roy Singham, a U.S. citizen, have been receiving direction from the Chinese Communist Party. A Communist revolutionary group with ties to a Communist China-linked Marxist funding network is at the forefront.”
DEVIN NUNES: “My summation of it is you have the 1960s left-wing radicals – who saw their violence quasi-work in the 1960s – they are now running the DNC.
[In other words, atheist Communist hippies from the 1960s are running the DNC and these NGOs all over the country with funding from the Chinese Communist Party.)
These radical left billionaires are trying to recreate the violence of the 1960s – [when they took out JFK, RFK, MLK, Malcolm, etc.] It’s now resulted in people getting assassinated.”
DEVIN NUNES: “It’s turned into nothing but a death cult. And Kash and the FBI, they have a lot of work cut out for them to try to get to the bottom of this – as Kash always said, you gotta follow the money.”
The only way this ends – in my humble opinion – is with a RICO case connected right to the top.
RICO TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS AUG 15
Some people wonder why Trump doesn’t just arrest all the coup plotters (starting at the top) and frog march them on TV for all the world to see. Well, there’s a logical reason for what he’s doing and the way he’s doing it. I have personal experience with that.
BTW – there are approximately 13,700 to 14,000 FBI Special Agents, with the total FBI workforce exceeding 37,000 employees operating in 56 different field offices. The corruption is deep and wide – so it’s not just a matter of firing a few agents.
Many of these FBI field offices have been infiltrated with left-wing radicals. We know for a fact – in the case of George Floyd – that the Minneapolis field office, and their Islamo-Communist Minnesota pals Keith Ellison & Ilhan Omar, hid relevant information from the public which led to the wrongful conviction of Derek Chauvin.
We already know for a fact that the Utah field office and the RINO Governor of Utah hid relevant information from Kash Patel – for 12 hours – on Charlie Kirk’s murderer as well!
The Good News is that God is already using Charlie’s death for good. Praise Him!
The Globalists & Charlie Kirk MICHAEL T. FLYNN LTG USA (RET)
Globalists Hate GOD
SEP 14, 2025
The Globalists Killed Charlie Kirk & they have names, see below.
Charlie Kirk’s death was a result of years of globalist de-humanization of conservatives, especially conservative Christians.
Globalists hate GOD!
These globalist “killers” are responsible for a campaign of de-humanization. For many years now, they demonized all of us with labels like racist, fascist, Nazi, far-right, or anti-this & anti-that, all for no reason other than to cause enough people to hate with such passion they were/are willing to resort to the most heinous of actions…such as murder or other demonic acts of power.
They censored us, they de-platformed us, they labeled us, they imprisoned many, they did anything they could to shut down our voices, all to achieve their evil ONE WORLD ORDER. A mission they are desperate to accomplish.
Charlie Kirk’s brutal assassination is a stark warning to many other public personas to shut up, or your next. Trump’s two known assassination attempts were a warning to him (don’t kid yourselves).
Despite humanity discovering how horrible they are, these same globalists will refuse to back down.
This MUST come to an end (but won’t).
Why?
They see humanity as something to control & if things in America don’t radically change, if the @realDonaldTrump administration doesn’t go to a WAR footing & gut the “deep state”, the globalists will achieve their reprehensible mission.
Yes Mr. @POTUS America is a nation at WAR & we must start acting like it.
This isn’t about a few bad apples in parts of the federal government that can easily be rooted out. This is a pervasive, insidious dark undercurrent of tens of thousands of actors throughout all our institutions of power. They exist at the local, state, federal, corporate, & military levels & they are organized, well funded & well resourced in many other ways.
We need to rip the band aids off now!
How do they operate?
They still have their media networks. They own most politicians, they control our education system from elementary to institutions of “higher” learning, they own other influencers worldwide such as those in Hollywood, all who are being paid in some form or fashion to promote the globalist agenda & help achieve the globalist goal of One World Government.
Don’t believe me? Just listen to what many of these “killers” have said in the past.
Who are they?
Their names have become all too familiar. They are Soros, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Gates, Schwab, Macron, Starmer, Merz, all, and many others, are part of a liberal-globalist elite that over decades demonized their political opponents & accepted an unholy alliance with Godless societies & other like minded -isms. They’ve been smart to muddy the battlefield’s lines of distinction. Like an insurgency, where the enemy walks among us.
Charlie Kirk’s brutal & very visible public execution is now clearing those battle lines up. And trust, Tyler Robinson was a patsy in their network of insurgents.
So What?
There is a war being waged, yet we are not fighting as though we’re at war. But make no mistake, our nation & our freedoms are under attack.
The globalists hate us, they despise us, they want many of us dead, but trust when I say this…THEY FEAR US!
They fear us because we still profess a love of God. We still outwardly demonstrate that our Christian principles & values remain first in the lives of the majority of Americans. We don’t require new laws from the likes of Sharia or Canon or the whim of a dictator or king or communist premier.
We only require that all who wish to live in America (generations that came & new generations to come) assimilate & join TEAM AMERICA!
We The People are done being demonized. Like many, I want the Trump administration to see the reality & get to work. Gut the deep state & stop pretending like this is politics as usual.
Freedom and hope are everything and worth fighting for.
God Bless America 🙏🏼
The Con Job of ‘Islamophobia’ Brigitte Gabriel
Europe has Suddenly Awakened (Will We?)
SEP 14, 2025 ACT FOR AMERICA
The lazy days of summer’s end skipped the United Kingdom and Australia this year. Mass protests swept across the Western world. Tens of thousands gathered in U.K. cities such as London, Epping, Bristol, Birmingham, Falkirk, Gloucester, Newcastle and Essex, where the streets were decorated with Union Jack flags. There were smaller rallies in Scotland and Wales.
In Australia, an estimated 45,000 took to the streets in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra under the banner “March for Australia.” More than 100 Polish cities hosted their own assemblies.
What, you heard nothing about it? Well, the mainstream media ignores these stories because they involve the public disapproval of mass migration. White Europeans and Australians have come to recognize the irrefutable correlation between Muslim immigrants and violent crime. It simply can no longer be denied or wished away.
What news-gathering outlets report instead are rampaging Muslims and progressives screaming about a fictional, pretextual genocide in Gaza. Not even one thought it newsworthy to inform its readers and viewing audience that native Europeans chanted, “You can stick your Palestine up your hole.”
White Europeans, for the most part—at least those without pink or purple hair—don’t see Israel or Jews as the problem. They believe, instead, that their leaders have self-destructively welcomed a critical mass of unvetted Muslims into their nations. These arrivals have repeatedly demonstrated that they want no part of democratic governments. Sharia law is their North Star, and it is fundamentally incompatible with liberal values.
Europe has suddenly awakened from its Islamic slumber.
In the U.K., social tensions have escalated since July, mainly outside of hotels housing asylum seekers. Immigrants are being sheltered in these facilities, but who is protecting British citizens—especially white women—from being attacked by, of all people, asylum seekers?
The same protests occurred outside asylum centers in Ireland. There is great frustration over dwindling housing stock, declining public services, and added pressure on healthcare systems. But polls show that crime is the main concern.
This week, on September 13, in Central London, a march titled The Free Speech Festival will commence at Stamford Street and end at Whitehall, followed by speeches featuring British media personalities, commentators and right-wing public figures calling for the end of the Islamization of Europe.
What has sparked this pervasive social upheaval? The Daily Telegraph recently reported that one million people in the U.K. don’t speak English. For fully half the school children in England, English is not their primary language. White children are a minority in one of every four schools and make up less than two percent of the students in nearly 500 schools.
Integration appears hopeless. There are 150 Sharia courts throughout the country. Why speak the Queen’s language if a caliphate is just around the corner?
U.K. cities such as London, Sheffield, Birmingham and Luton not only have Muslim mayors, but Muslim city councils.
There is a widespread feeling that European culture—an entire way of life—is disappearing. And the decision to undergo this change was made by leftist elites without the public’s consent.
All of Europe is looking inward. Sweden’s white population will be the minority by 2040. In its most recent census, fewer than 40 percent of the population in the U.K. self-identified as Christian. Before too long, open borders and fanatical multiculturalism will leave Europe with Muslim majorities and buyer’s remorse.
Who knows whether this backlash would have taken hold without rising crime. Europeans are sickened by an epidemic of gangraping Muslim men, called “grooming gangs,” who believe the Koran grants them carte blanche privileges to rape infidel women—in broad daylight! This has happened to thousands of white women in the U.K. and across the continent. There is also gang violence, acid attacks, car rammings, and public stabbings.
When and if apprehended, these assailants are soon released or given light sentences. Why? Well, judges, apparently, attribute these heinous crimes to “cultural differences.” Sometimes courts blame 12-year-old girls for seducing Muslim men! Anything to avoid charges of Islamophobia and antagonizing wrathful, maniacal Muslims.
Talk about moral relativism on crack.
Church fires are on the rise, too. This year alone:150 in the U.K., 68 in Canada, 60 in Germany. Over 1,000 churches in France have been vandalized.
Take a guess who the arsonists are. It’s not the Jews. It’s those with an open contempt for infidels and apostates. The same people who established Sharia patrols to supervise un-Islamic behavior—hassling European women for their dress and homosexuals for their mere existence.
And if you complain about it, criticize Islam, look at the Koran the wrong way, or offer a contrary opinion about the virtues of diversity, you can end up in jail for hate speech. That’s why this Saturday’s U.K. rally is called The Free Speech Festival.
But what about accusations of Islamophobia, which seem to shut down all honest conversations about Islam’s intolerance for the West? The word is mostly defined as an irrational hatred. The hatred of Muslims is irrational and flatly wrong. If it results in discrimination, it is also patently illegal. But the fear of Islam is not irrational; it is real. And fear is the more common understanding of a “phobia.”
Look around the world. Where do we see beheadings and dismemberments, suicide bombings, lashing of women, teaching children to slit throats, the hanging of homosexuals?
Antisemites scream genocide against Israel and placate Palestinians because, among other reasons, they are terrified to confront the easily provocable violence that lurks much closer to home.
Is the United States far behind? There are calls to prayer in the middle of the street in Philadelphia. A female Islamic professor from Minnesota just called for the dismantling of the United States.
Dearborn, Michigan, where most of the population is Muslim; Patterson, Prospect Park, and Montgomery, New Jersey; Bell, California—all have Muslim mayors and nearly all-Muslim city councils.
Not even one condemned what Hamas and Gazan civilians did on October 7, 2023. Nor have any called for the release of the Israeli and American hostages.
Oh, have I mentioned that New York City, home to the largest population of Jews in the United States, is about to elect a Muslim mayor who believes that “Globalize the Intifada!” is not a rallying cry for jihad, but a harmless gesture of support?
[Ed.:
[Ed.: A new trend has taken hold of many of our Democrat neighbors and ‘friends’ that has been deeply inspired by Charlie Kirk’s murder. Now, more than ever before, violence and murder are the left’s new ‘acceptable norm’ / modus operandi. Therefore, we should be on ‘high alert’ when in their proximity, and even when we can’t see them. This is not paranoia; this is caution. …Just sayin’. ]
Dennis Prager:
As an American, as a Jew, and as Dennis, I am devastated at the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The truth is, as I write these words, I can’t believe I am writing them. I am in the denial stage of mourning.
As an American, we have lost the most articulate spokesman for America and its unique value system—a country founded to be free, based on Jerusalem and Athens, the Judeo-Christian value system and the Greek emphasis on logic and reason. Charlie was a uniquely gifted individual who, in his teens, created the largest movement of young Americans committed to preserving and growing America and its ideals. He tirelessly went from campus to campus, from Oxford to Utah, dialoging with any student who wished to debate him. Using his vast reservoir of facts and his exceptionally speedy and articulate mind, he gave them what seemed to be unlimited amounts of time, and then calmy eviscerated all their anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-Judeo-Christian positions. I watched an inordinate number of these exchanges and thanked God that Charlie Kirk was there to do this work. America’s youth in particular have lost a moral and intellectual leader, one who would, perhaps, have one day become their president.
As a committed Jew, I thank God regularly that a non-Jew, a committed Christian, became one of the few great public spokesmen on behalf of Israel the Jewish communities outside of Israel. Few Jews could match Charlie’s knowledge and eloquent arguments on behalf of those two entities.
As Dennis, I have lost a very close friend. Charlie repeatedly visited me in the various hospitals that I have been in since November 12 of last year, when I suffered a catastrophic fall which has left me paralyzed. When members of the nursing staff heard that Charlie Kirk was visiting me, my room became the most popular one in the hospital. Charlie brought me the manuscript of his forthcoming book arguing that everyone—Christians as well as Jews—should observe Shabbat, the Jewish Sabbath, just as he and his family had begun to do from Friday sundown to Saturday sundown. It is a measure of our close relationship that he dedicated the book to me. His brilliant exposition of these arguments provide clear evidence for the non-necessity of a college education for most young Americans.
My heart breaks for his young widow, Erika, and for his two children, who have lost as great a man and a father as children can have. And for Charlie, who did not live to see them grow up. For one of the first times in my 20 years with my wife, Sue, I have seen her sob uncontrollably. The Prager home is in deep mourning, as are the homes of countless Americans. The loss to us personally and to the country generally is immeasurable.
US’ Low-Risk Investment in Israel Compared to Zig-Zagging Allies Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger
September 12, 2025 “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
*Iran was generally neutral-to-friendly toward the US until the 1951 rise to power of the pro-Soviet Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, who demoted the pro-US Shah to a marginalized ceremonial monarch. During the period 1953-1978, following the dismissal of Mosaddegh, and the restoration of the executive power of the Shah, Iran functioned as one of the US’ most trusted Cold War allies, a Major Non-NATO Ally of the US and “the American Policeman of the Gulf.” This strategic honeymoon was terminated by the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which transformed Iran into a clear and present threat to the US, the chief global epicenter of civil wars, anti-US terrorism, drug trafficking and money laundering in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, with a multitude of terror sleeper cells on US soil.
*In the long run, US policy in the Middle East is challenged by alliances with Middle Eastern Arab/Muslim countries, which are as jerkily spiral as has been the volcanic nature of the Middle East since the 7th century:
<Local/tribal loyalty transcends national loyalty;
<Violent intolerance toward one another (and toward the “infidel”), religiously, ideologically, culturally, geographically and economically. Thus, since 1948, over 10 million Muslims were killed in intra-Muslim wars, compared to 100,000 Muslims killed in wars against Israel);
<No long-term peaceful coexistence among Muslims/Arabs, domestically and regionally;
<Regimes rise to power via the bullet, not ballot;
<Subversion and terrorism feature in the intra-Muslim and intra-Arab sphere;
<Violent instability and unpredictability;
<Centrality of religion and ideology in shaping visions and policies;
<Shifty alliances, policies and accords are derivative of tenuous minority and non-democratic regimes;
<Alliances are regime-dependent.
The following are a few examples of the erratic twirl of Middle Eastern alliances, in addition to the aforementioned zig-zagging Iranian chronicle:
*Since Libya’s 1951 independence, King Idris was pro-US, allowing the 1954 establishment of the Wheelus Air Force base, which wasthe largest US Air Force base outside the USA, with 4,600-6,000 US soldiers. Wheelus played a critical role during the Cold War, providing the US refueling, training, and a springboard operational base toward Southern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. In 1969, Libya’s allegiance was flipped overnight, when the pro-Soviet Col. Gaddafi toppled King Idris, expelled US forces, relied on Soviet weaponry, and actively supported anti-US and anti-European Islamic terrorism. However, from the early 2000s, Gaddafi distanced himself from Islamic terrorism, cooperating with the US and Europe in the battle against al-Qaeda and other Jihadist movements in Central and North Africa. In 2003,Gaddafi surrendered to the US the infrastructure of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, chemical and biological). In 2011, Gaddafi’s rule was terminated by a US-initiated NATO-led military offensive, accusing Gaddafi of severe violations of human rights (in his battle against Islamic terrorists….). Gaddafi was lynched by Islamic terrorists, transforming Libya into a major platform of civil wars and anti-US and anti-Western Islamic terrorism.
*In 1952, Egypt’s King Farouk was toppled by a military coup, transforming Egypt into a The leading Soviet strategic ally in the Middle East – notwithstanding the US’ economic and diplomatic overtures – aiming to topple all pro-US oil-producing Arab regimes, at a time when the US was heavily dependent upon Persian Gulf oil. Following the 1973 Arab-Israel War, which highlighted the effectiveness of US-Israel strategic cooperation, President Sadatshifted away from the USSR toward the USA. In 2011, the pro-US President Mubarak was toppled by the anti-US Muslim Brotherhood, which won the 2012 election, only to be toppled in 2013 by the pro-US General Sisi.
*In 1958, Iraq’s pro-US Hashemite King Faisal was toppled by the pro-Soviet General Abd al-Karim Qasim. During 1958-1979, there were a series of military coups, led by pro-Soviet generals. The pro-Soviet Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq during 1979-2003 until the Second Gulf War, aligning himself with the US against Iran during the 1980-1988 Iraq-Iran war, but then turned against the US through the August 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Since the US-orchestrated 2003 the rise to power of Iraq’s Shiites, Iran’s Ayatollah regime has become a dominant power in Iraq.
*The 2011-12 Yemen revolution elevated the pro-US Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi to power until he was toppled in 2014-15 by the anti-US and pro-Ayatollah Houthis.
*Qatar is a Major Non-NATO Ally of the US, the site of the al-Udeid US Air Base, the largest US military base in the Middle East, a major trade partner with – and a leading investor in – the US. At the same time, Qatar is a close ally of the anti-US Iran’s Ayatollah regime, the leading financial supporter of Hamas, Hezbollah and the anti-US Muslim Brotherhood, which is the largest Sunni terror organization and the “parent company” of Hamas. Qatar is the leading donor to US universities, promoting teachings, which are consistent with its Muslim Brotherhood-oriented ideology. Notwithstanding their diplomatic talk, and contrary to the US foreign policy establishment, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain are well aware of Qatar’s ideology and strategy, viewing Doha as a clear and present threat to regional stability (hence, the 2017-2021 Saudi-led blockade of Qatar).
*A core challenge for US Middle East policy: the long-term fate of US alliances with Muslim/Arab regimes is fluid, depending on the ideology of despotic and tenuous regimes, as well as on the intrinsically internal and regional instability and pressures.
*Unlike Arab allies of the US, Israel has been an unconditional, reliable, democratic, pro-active and low/no-risk ally, serving as a 5-CIA-like source of intelligence, and the leading battle-tested-laboratory for the US defense and aerospace industries and Armed Forces. Israel is the Show Room for inducing US defense exports, a major innovation center for the US high tech giants, and the largest US aircraft carrier, which does not require US soldiers on board, yielding a mega-billion-dollar Return-on-Investment for the US.
*Unlike the European allies of the US, whose strategic cooperation depends on the Left/Right ideology of the government and domestic public opinion, a vast majority of Israel’s constituency and political establishment has been unconditionally pro-US, irrespective of Left/Right governments in Jerusalem and independent of a DEM or GOP presidency in Washington.
Dark Web Peggy Tierney
SEP 13, 2025 TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
I am working on an in-depth report on the awful assassination of Charlie Kirk – but I’m waiting a few more days for the complete story to emerge. In the meantime, you need to know this background as you do your own research.
Tyler Robinson was allegedly called a “Reddit” kid and used several layers of the internet to communicate and he wasn’t acting alone. Why is that important? Today, we can add the “Dark Web” to Satan’s toolbox of tricks – on how our enemies (both foreign and domestic) are able to brainwash and coerce patsies to do unspeakable things.
First, this is an excellent post from Larry Schweikart. I honestly knew nothing about the “Dark Web” before I read this:
1) I had a fascinating talk with my son, who is both in med tech for a big company but also who is a very plugged-in gamer. He is a single male, who knows quite well the inner workings of Reddit and 4Chan. Above all he is up on male culture age 20-40. Tyler was called a Reddit kid.
2) In discussing what radicalized this shooter, who came from a good family and had good grades, he was quick in his response: Reddit and 4 Chan and the Dark Web.
3) Smart kids know how to mask their real activities from their parents. Unless you’re snooping in their computer they would be difficult to detect.
4) Me: “The radicalization occurred in probably a year or less.”
Him: “Yeah, doesn’t take long. He had both alt-right postings but also total left postings, including one people mistake for a transoid symbol but which is actually a deeper, worse nearly demonic symbol that is quite prominent on 4Chan.
5) ME: “Looks like the 71 year old guy was an accomplice of sorts, or an activated patsy.”
Him: “Yes. And also note the guys behind Kirk giving hand signals.”
6) Me: “How deep does this stuff go?”
Him: “You don’t want to know. 4Chan is like the public spot, but if you go to 8Chan it is hideous.”
7) Me: “How do you stop these guys?”
Him: “Honestly, you need a new three-letter agency, which is horrible, but you need one that is made up essentially of these types of people. [This is the old Allan Dulles approach to spycraft, bring in commies who know the system.] You need people to get inside ALL these social media accounts, emails, everything. But almost no one with those skills wants anything to do with the government. Any government. And to be honest, anyone you have doing this cannot do it for very long at all. What you see on these sites is so repulsive, so gory, so horrible, that they themselves become screwed up.”
Me: “So, if you had such an agency, you’d have to rotate the Watchers out at a minimum of every year or they’d go crazy?”
Him: “Yes.”
9) Him: “These disaffected young males, who don’t think they have anything to live for are very easily radicalized.”
10) Me: “Does a solution involve public arrests, and so on, of the bigger names?”
Him: “You need Soros, Schwab, several VERY high profile people to get street justice, highly public executions, etc. for the normies. But you can’t change the underneath system.”
11) Him: “Note that it’s not just in the US. Did you see what happened in Nepal (where the former PM’s wife was burned alive and people were being whipped in the streets)?”
Me: “Yes. And Japan’s PM resigned, and the French govt fell apart.”
12) Him: “Indonesia & Philippines might be next. They are toppling.”
13) He then raised the point that many of the big techies are h***sexuals. “They’re all h***sexuals. Altman, the rest.” [Which means many of the big tech guys may even use the internet to create violence within the LGBTQ and transgender movement.]
14) Although he puts little hope—or desire—in a more normal political resolution, I do believe that revolutions that might put a Franco in power here are avoidable IF, and this is a big issue, IF Trump can produce enough high profile arrests to short-circuit what otherwise is sure to come.
For example, after a single execution in England in the 1640s, the Brits had a period under Cromwell (The Protectorate) that ended with a restoration of the King . . . but in MUCH different circumstances.
15) William & Mary came in in the “Glorious Revolution” & essentially bent the knee to Parliament, accepting the crown from THEM. But in France, the bloodlust and rage against the king got so bad that it swept almost anyone to the guillotine who in any way wanted to “mediate.”
16) Likewise in our Revolution, there was a two-step-to-democracy process of the Articles, then the Constitution, that convinced people their rights were safe. It didn’t hurt that most of the Tories left the US for England.
17) Anyway, my takeaway is that a) he is right about the need for a Watcher, as horrible as that sounds. This is not like Muslim terrorist summer camps. It’s happening ON THE WEB. b) I think Trump has a limited window, esp. after Iryna & Charlie so close together to make some very public arrests of BIG NAMES. There is a growing and very real sense of a two-tiered justice system, and Trump must show he can break that, even if in a symbolic way.
18) Last, we need a major reform via FCC of the Hoax News media. You cannot allow these agents of evil to spread filth and vile 24/7. Simply firing a Matt Dowd here and there is not enough. Rip the weed up by the roots. Curse that evil fig tree.
That’s what Larry had to say. Let’s go on…
What is the Dark Web? The Dark Web is a small, unindexed part of the internet that requires specialized software, like the Tor browser, to access. It is characterized by its focus on user anonymity through layered encryption, making it a platform for both legitimate activities by journalists, activists, and whistleblowers, and illicit operations such as the sale of stolen personal data, drugs, and illegal weapons. While not illegal in itself, the content and activities within the Dark Web can be illegal and are often associated with criminal acts due to the high level of privacy and anonymity provided.
Many consider the internet and web to be synonymous; they are not. The web is just one portion of the internet, and a medium through which information may be accessed.
- Within the web, one portion is known as the surface web, comprised of content that has been indexed and is accessible through traditional search engines such as Google.
- Another portion of the web is the deep web, which contains content that has not been indexed and thus is not accessible through traditional search engines. This includes content on private intranets (internal networks such as those at corporations, government agencies, or universities), and commercial databases like Westlaw. Accessing this content often requires authentication (i.e., verification of the user’s identity) and permission to access the content.
- Within the deep web is the dark web, the segment of the deep web that has been intentionally hidden. It refers to internet sites that users generally cannot access without using special software. While the content of these sites may be accessed using this software, publishers of these sites are often concealed. Users access the dark web with the expectation of being able to share information and/or files with little risk of detection.
The dark web can be reached through decentralized, anonymized nodes on various networks including Tor (short for The Onion Router) or I2P (Invisible Internet Project). Tor, which was initially released as The Onion Routing project in 2002, was originally created by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory as a tool for anonymously communicating online. Using Tor in conjunction with a virtual private network (VPN) provides additional privacy for nefarious activities.
The Tor network uses “onion routing,” which encrypts internet traffic and sends it through several random, encrypted servers called nodes. This process makes it difficult to trace user activity and identify the origin of the data, providing a high level of anonymity.
The Dark Web provides a safe space for journalists to protect their sources and for dissidents to communicate in oppressive regimes without being tracked.
The Dark Web is a marketplace for stolen data, including credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, and login credentials from data breaches. Election fraud can be perpetrated with information sold on the Dark Web.
What else can you buy on the Dark Web? You can buy credit card numbers, all manner of drugs, guns, counterfeit money, stolen subscription credentials, hacked Netflix accounts and software that helps you break into other people’s computers. Buy login credentials to a $50,000 Bank of America account, counterfeit $20 bills, prepaid debit cards, or a “lifetime” Netflix premium account. You can hire hackers to attack computers for you. You can buy usernames and passwords.
Users can also find software that facilitates hacking and other malicious activities, including assassins for hire.
Intelligence agencies and law enforcement also use the Dark Web for secure communication and to gather intelligence. Just as criminals can leverage the anonymity of the dark web, so too can law enforcement. They can use it to conduct online surveillance and sting operations and to maintain anonymous tip lines. Federal investigations of dark web cases are often multiagency initiatives. [In other words, rogue agents can use the Dark Web to manipulate or set up or frame people in any number of ways.]
According to metrics from the Tor Project, the mean number of daily Tor users in 2024 in the United States was about 500,000. The United States had the second largest number of mean daily Tor users during this time period, behind Germany. That’s a huge number of potential assets, patsies or assassins.
Discord, Reddit, 4chan, and 8chan were all allegedly platforms that Tyler Robinson was using to communicate. They are not considered part of the dark web—they are all accessible on the regular internet through standard browsers and do not require special software like Tor or I2P for access. These platforms are classified as surface web sites, meaning anyone can visit them using a regular internet connection and web browser.
Discord is an online chat platform designed primarily for real-time text, voice, and video communication. People use Discord for group chats, gaming communities, and social circles. Many servers on Discord are private and cater to niche interests or groups.
Reddit is a large “social news” site with thousands of communities (called subreddits), each focused on specific topics, hobbies, or interests. Users post links, questions, memes, and stories, and vote content up or down. Tyler Robinson has been called a “Reddit kid.”
“Reddit kid” is an internet slang phrase used to stereotype someone who acts immaturely, is overly enthusiastic about Reddit culture, or frequently uses Reddit-style memes. It’s often used jokingly or as a mild insult, implying the person is naive, childish, or primarily interacts online through Reddit.
4chan is an anonymous imageboard forum known for its chaotic, unrestricted posting style. Users rarely use real names and discussion is fast-paced, typically focusing on memes, internet culture, and controversial topics. Its culture can be much more provocative and less moderated compared to Reddit.
8chan is an online imageboard and forum that became infamous for its extreme free speech stance and lack of moderation, attracting users who wanted fewer restrictions than platforms like 4chan.
8chan was created in 2013 by Fredrick Brennan and allows users to create their own topic boards and post anonymously. It quickly gained a reputation for hosting highly controversial and extremist content, including hate speech, conspiracy theories, and materials banned from more strictly moderated sites.
Originally envisioned as a free-speech haven, 8chan became a hotspot for rhetoric, harassment campaigns, and was even linked to violent real-world events when perpetrators posted their manifestos there before attacks.
Ownership transferred from Brennan to Jim Watkins, a U.S. Army veteran, in 2015. Brennan later distanced himself from the site and called for its shutdown due to its association with extremism and violence.
The site was taken offline multiple times after losing support from key internet service companies, but later resurfaced as 8kun.
- Dark Web refers to parts of the internet intentionally hidden and inaccessible using standard browsers—often requiring Tor or other anonymizing software. The dark web is known for anonymous communications and is associated with illegal activities, but also hosts privacy-focused forums.
- Surface Web is everything that is easily reached through browsers and search engines (like Google)—including Discord, Reddit, 4chan, and 8chan.
- Some platforms imitate Reddit’s design and operate on the dark web, such as the forum “Dread,” which is an onion-based discussion platform accessible only via Tor.
Now that you have a better understanding of modern-day tools used by demons in the Deep State and our enemies to brainwash, coerce and twist young minds – read my expose on MKUltra again and it will all become clear what’s going on in the world today. In fact the drugs and the methods they use today are so sophisticated (it’s not just LSD anymore) and so strong that they can totally erase a person’s mind and memories – and replace it with whatever they want:
·
SEP 5
Back in the 1950’s, as the Cold War with the Soviet Union was heating up, the CIA became convinced that the Communists had discovered a drug or technique that would allow them to control human minds. In response, the CIA began its own secret program, called MKUltra, in April 1953, to search for a mind control drug that could be weaponized against enemies…
