Daily Shmutz | COMMENTARY / OPINION | 5/17/23

COMMENTARY / OPINION  

911 truth architect Richard Gage unloads irrefutable evidence of Building 7 controlled demolition   Mike Adams

Today we feature a bombshell interview with Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth.In this interview, we reveal how the truth about covid is exposing the lies about 9/11 (and building 7 in particular).

 

Who funds the WHO? Where does the money go?     JAMES ROGUSKI

MAY 16, 2023 – In 2022, the World Health Organization spent twice as much money on salaries ($1.164 billion) as they did on medical supplies and materials ($551 million).

Summary of WHO 2022 Financial Details

  • The World Health Organization has net assets of $5.02 billion.
  • In 2022k, the World Health Organization had revenue of $4.354 billion, and expenses of $3.848 billion, with a net surplus of $506 million.
  • Voluntary contributions ($3.656 billion) made up 84% of the revenue received by the World Health Organization in 2022. These contributions often come with “strings” attached by the donors.
  • The 194 member nations contributed a total of $496 million in assessed conributions. Please note that the assessed payments made by the member nations were less than the net surplus!
  • The United States “donated” an additional $739 million over and above it’s required assessed payment.
  • Nearly 35% of expenditures ($1.337 billion) went to “Contractual Services.”
  • Over 30% of expenditures ($1.062 billion) went to the 8,851 World Health Organization staff members who earned an average of $120,000 each.
  • Only 13% of expenditures ($511 million) went to medical supplies and materials.
  • World Health Organization travel expenses totaled $161 million in 2022, more than double the amount of $78 million in 2021.

REVENUE

In 2022, the total revenue of the World Health Organization rose to $4.354 billion, and expenses grew to $3.848 billion. The United States donated $739 million (in excess of its assessed contributions) that mostly went unspent and contributed to the WHO’s $506 million surplus in 2022.

Total assessed contributions ($496 million) represented just 11% of total revenue in 2022

 

Deace: Carl Fish is trying to do what too many Americans take for granted: Be free   OP-ED    STEVE DEACE

May 15, 2023 – I’ve been where Carl Fish is. A lot.

You do the thing you think God wants you to do, and … nothing.

You say the thing you think needs to be said to the people you think need to hear it, and … nothing.

In Carl’s case, he kept his Bucks County, Pennsylvania, gym open when everybody started to panic about COVID in March 2020. He thought it was unconstitutional to tell him to do otherwise. He thought telling people to stop exercising in order to stay healthy was absurd.

So he was determined to set an example that would encourage others to resist the building fear and confusion. He put privacy screens on his windows once Pennsylvania’s governor ordered “non-essential” businesses closed and allowed his gym’s members to use the 24/7 facility as they saw fit, turning it into what Carl called a “fitness speakeasy” where the members began trading texts with one another to warn when the police were watching outside.

It was a dance that grew more tenuous as Carl became aware of the identities of those who were ratting him out to police. Finally, on April 10 – Good Friday – Carl was given notice that he and his business would have the doors chained indefinitely after being declared a “public health menace.” If anyone was in the building at the time this order was enforced, the order said they “risked being locked inside.”

And that’s exactly what happened to Carl. But again, he thought taking a stand would help people find their courage and their sanity again. He stayed locked in for nearly two weeks, surviving on protein bars and protein shakes. Surely, Americans wouldn’t accept such tyranny for long. Surely, they would wake up and take their country back.

They didn’t.

 

Total Page Visits: 367
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.