COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?]
[Ed.: How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
VSRF Live #149: Self Amplifying MRNA Vaccines with Dr. Jessica Rose [LIVE] Interview with Steve Kirsch
October 24, 2024
This week on VSRF LIVE we are covering a breaking and crucial topic of concern; the emergence of SA-MRNA vaccines just recently approved for use in Japan. And there’s no one better to help bring clarity and facts to this frightening, confusing and controversial topic than good friend of VSRF and molecular biology expert, Dr. Jessica Rose PhD. Dr. Rose has a BSc. in Applied Mathematics, an MSc. in Immunology, a PhD in Computational Biology and a two Post Docs in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry.
While supporters of the novel and questionable new technology claim that unlike the now “traditional” mRNA vaccine platform which protects against infectious diseases by instructing cells in the body to make “just” a specific protein, SA-mRNA makes its own copies of the mRNA which generates the production of more protein compared to an equivalent amount of mRNA in a vaccine. Supporters claim that this new technology has the potential to create more potent cellular immune responses and increase duration of protection, while using considerably lower doses of mRNA.
Yet opponents of the new technology are calling this new development nothing short of a doomsday medical machine, exploiting the little we already know about the risks and long term effects of mRNA vaccines and potentially super-charging them exponentially. Furthermore, opponents argue that the new SA-mRNA technology has the potential to spread to the unvaccinated; leaving not only those who’ve taken the shots at risk, but others around them who have NOT taken the vaccines.
Join us for this critical discussion about a game changing technology about to be unleashed on the world, and what, if anything, we can do to protect ourselves and the ones we love.
Support the work of VSRF at https://VacSafety.org/donate
Donations are tax deductible and we need your support to continue our work into 2024. Or to text-to-donate, text LIBERTY to 53555
Connecting yet more Dots TOM JEFFERSON
Exaggerating the Influenza Threat – Reflections of a long-time Cochrane reviewer.
OCT 24, 2024 – I beg all of you who were or will be offered an influenza vaccination to consider the content of this post when deciding whether to accept.
We have published posts presenting evidence that the influenza threat has been inflated.
ALL Recombinant Vaccines and Adjuvants – Not Just Covid-19 Vaccines – Are Now Implicated in DNA Contamination Scandal By Lance D Johnson
All vaccines utilize a risky transfection process using adjuvants
October 23, 2024 LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY – Numerous laboratory studies have confirmed the presence of plasmid DNA in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, a recent analysis reveals that a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine can contain over 200 billion DNA fragments. These are nucleotides that should never enter the human supply chain because they can cause cancer.
Plasmids, which are used in the manufacturing process for vaccines, carry genetic material that can inadvertently enter the human body through vaccination. Plasmids can disrupt cellular functions or contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. These fragments have the potential to integrate into the DNA of vaccinated individuals, potentially disrupting the function of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. One troubling aspect is the inclusion of sequences from the SV40 virus, known for its cancer-causing properties. The implications of such contamination are dire, with experts warning of the potential for permanent genetic changes in vaccine recipients.
This serious safety concern necessitates that ALL recombinant vaccines be investigated for DNA contamination. The current findings on DNA contamination across the vaccine supply are startling, and warrant an audit into the manufacturing processes of vaccines, including investigations into the role adjuvants and lipid nanoparticles play in facilitating the DNA contamination of human cells.
Australia taking DNA contamination of COVID vaccines seriously now
The Port Hedland council in Australia recently passed a motion recognizing “unacceptable levels of plasmid DNA contamination” in mRNA COVID vaccines. The motion, which also mandated the dissemination of this information to health practitioners and vaccine recipients, represents a significant shift in how vaccine safety concerns are addressed. Given Port Hedland’s economic significance in Australia, this council’s decision is likely to have far-reaching implications. For the first time, health practitioners are being formally alerted to the dangers posed by plasmid contamination — a topic that has been heavily suppressed since the #plasmidgate controversy surfaced in early 2023.
Adjuvants in Gardasil vaccine may facilitate plasmids into teenagers
Compounding the controversy is a recent exposé written by investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi. The exposé reveals similar issues with the Gardasil HPV vaccine. The report highlights the FDA’s awareness of residual plasmid DNA in Gardasil, a contamination concern that dates back to 2011. This is an issue that has been blacklisted from vaccine safety discussions in the media and between government regulators.
This DNA contamination is made more dangerous due to the use of adjuvants in vaccines. The adjuvant is added to vaccines to enhance the immune response. One of the most common adjuvants – aluminum salts – technically act as a transfection agent, allowing foreign DNA to enter the cytoplasm of human immune cells, which then circulate throughout the body. The implications of this toxic facilitation are profound; the introduction of lab-derived plasmids into the human body poses significant risks, including the potential for cancer and other genetic diseases.
Antigen levels and body weight/blood volume of vaccine recipient are important factors
COVID-19 vaccines use lipid nanoparticles which facilitate the entry of plasmid DNA into human cells. The Novavax vaccine contains a saponin adjuvant that has similar risks as the lipid nanoparticles. A Hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B), used in newborn babies, contains both aluminum hydroxide and polysorbate 20. These ingredients act as transfection agents, potentially facilitating plasmids into the baby and setting the stage for childhood cancer.
Moreover, a greater quantity of antigen has a greater chance of introducing plasmids into human cells. Conversely, the DNA contamination could have more pronounced effects on babies with a lower blood volume and body weight. The Engerix vaccine (injected into babies) contains 20 micrograms of antigen, whereas the Gardasil HPV vaccine (injected into teenagers) contains 270 micrograms. The dosage of the antigen is important, as well as the blood volume and weight of the person being injected.
The HPV vaccine contains 13 times more foreign proteins and DNA than the Hep B vaccines. Essentially, the HPV vaccines is equivalent to 13 injections of the Hep vaccine, in terms of antigen quantity. Still, the Hep B vaccine is given to infants, not teenagers, and therefore introduces a disproportionate level of contamination to a baby with lower blood volume and body weight. Both vaccines pose serious DNA contamination risks on two different ends of the exposure spectrum.
All vaccines utilize a risky transfection process using adjuvants
Essential to the function of a vaccine is the term “transfection.” This process allows foreign genetic material to enter human cells — a mechanism that typically doesn’t occur naturally. Human cells possess protective barriers that prevent the uptake of foreign nucleic acids. However, laboratory techniques have been developed to bypass these defenses. The main methods of transfection include:
- Mechanical Disruption: Physically puncturing the cell membrane to allow DNA entry
- Chemical Facilitation: Utilizing chemicals that mimic essential cellular components, acting like a Trojan horse to transport DNA into the cell
- Electroporation: Applying an electric field to create temporary pores in the cell membrane, though this method is less practical for widespread human use
Among these, chemical agents are the most viable for introducing nucleic acids into cells. Commonly used transfection agents include cationic particles, which are positively charged and attract the negatively charged components of cell membranes. Detergents can also disrupt membranes, enabling the entry of nucleic acids. The concern surrounding the use of lab-reagent plasmids is significant. These plasmids can contain nucleotides that may lead to severe genetic consequences, including cancer, if transferred into human cells. When a transfection agent is present, the likelihood of this transfer increases substantially.
While many are familiar with standard transfection agents like lipids (lipofectamine, lipid nanoparticles) and calcium phosphate, a broader range of substances can act as transfection agents. Here are some less commonly recognized ones:
- Polysorbate: A surfactant/emulsifier that can enhance transfection
- Metallic Cations: Elements such as aluminum, zirconium, and cerium, known for their positive charge and transfection efficiency
- Saponins: Soaps used as adjuvants in certain vaccines, promoting transfection
- Histidine: A positively charged amino acid that can aid in the transfection processUnderstanding the toxicity potential of these transfection agents is crucial, especially in light of their implications for causing cancer in children, teenagers, and adults.
Sources include:
ArkMedic.info [1]
ArkMedic.info [2]
Blog.MaryAnneDemasi.substack.com
Contaminated Vaccines, Iatrogenic Deaths, Future Worries Among the Vaccinated [23:29] PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough Returns to the Liz Wheeler Show
OCT 24, 2024 – The rush to produce mRNA vaccines after 2020 clinical trials that were only three months in duration has been a biotechnology debacle. Despite billions of government dollars pour into the vaccine manufacturers and their biodefense subcontractors, the quality of the COVID-19 vaccine products particularly Pfizer and Moderna has been horrific. The religious belief in a vaccine like a talisman has most still feeling safe and secure despite record injuries, disabilities, and death all around.
From marked batch to batch variability in adverse events, to visible debris at the bottom of the vials, and molecular labs detecting contamination with putative proto-oncogene activator SV-40 (promoter, enhancer, origin of insertion), the mRNA industry is off to a disastrous start. No regulatory agency in any country has open the vials after fill-and-finish to inspect them for quality, quantity, and purity. Please enjoy this quick-hitting interview with Liz Wheeler who is back from her maternity leave.
[Ed.: How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
Bill Gates Ordered to Stand Trial in Netherlands in November Over COVID Vaccine Injury Claims — Ordered to Pay Legal Costs as Dutch Court Dismisses Jurisdiction Claim By Jim Hᴏft
Oct. 23, 2024 8:15 am – A Dutch court has ruled that billionaire and global vaccine proponent Bill Gates will face trial in the Netherlands over his involvement in misleading the public about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
The case, brought forward by seven plaintiffs who claim to have suffered vaccine injuries, marks a significant blow to Gates, who has been a key figure in pushing COVID-19 vaccination efforts worldwide.
According to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf, the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit last year, naming Gates, along with former Dutch Prime Minister and current NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, members of the Dutch government’s COVID-19 Outbreak Management Team, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and the Dutch state itself.
Gates is one of the “experts” who made several claims about the COVID experimental vaccines:
- They said the vaccine would stop transmission.
- They said the vaccinated could quit wearing a mask.
- They said the vaccinated would not get sick.
- They said the vaccinated were not going to die.
The plaintiffs argue that Gates, through his involvement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (WEF), was involved in a far-reaching agenda—referred to as “The Great Reset Project”—which sought to exploit the global crisis in order to implement sweeping societal changes, all under the guise of combating the pandemic.
According to the lawsuit, this agenda included pushing vaccines that were known to be unsafe.
The plaintiffs claim they were deceived into taking these dangerous injections, and the consequences have been devastating. Physical and mental injuries have allegedly plagued them since receiving the vaccine.
One of the seven plaintiffs has reportedly died since the initial filing, leaving six others to carry on the fight against Gates and his cohorts. These ordinary Dutch citizens, whose identities have been redacted from the court documents, say they trusted the vaccine narrative and are now paying the price.
The plaintiffs referenced various public statements made by Gates, including a widely viewed YouTube video from April 2020 titled “The Race for a COVID-19 Vaccine, Explained,” as part of their evidence.
Despite Gates’ attempts to evade the Dutch court’s jurisdiction by claiming that, as an American citizen, he should not be subject to legal proceedings in the Netherlands, the court rejected this argument, according to independent researcher and reporter Penny Marie.
On October 16, 2024, the Leeuwarden District Court announced that it does indeed have jurisdiction to hear the case against Gates.
The billionaire was represented in court by a lawyer from PelsRijcken but did not attend the September 18 hearing in person. His legal team’s defense crumbled when the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
According to the judgment:
Article 7 paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that if the Dutch court has jurisdiction over one of the defendants, it also has jurisdiction over other defendants involved in the same proceedings, provided that there is such a connection between the claims against the various defendants that reasons of expediency justify joint proceedings.
[…]
As the court understands, [redacted] et al. argue that Hofstra et al., and therefore Gates, are part of a worldwide group of individuals, legal entities and other entities that, in the context of the implementation of a project called Covid 19: The Great Reset, have misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective. The court infers from Gates’ plea that Gates also understood [redacted] et al.’s position in this way. The court understands that [redacted] et al. further argue in this context that Gates committed this deception internationally through two videos that were published on YouTube in April and December 2020, in which Gates allegedly gave a false representation of the necessity of the Covid-19 injections and the safety of those injections respectively. To the extent that [redacted] et al. intended to state that any actions by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation should also be regarded as unlawful acts by Gates in this group context, the court disregards this in the context of this incident, as they have not substantiated this.
[…]
Based on the foregoing, this court has international jurisdiction to hear the claims against Gates on the basis of Article 7 paragraph l Rv.
The court ruled that Gates, who attempted to have the case dismissed or contest the court’s jurisdiction, was in the wrong. His legal challenge was dismissed, and as a result, he has been ordered to pay the legal fees of the plaintiffs.
According to court documents, Gates is required to cover the plaintiffs’ legal costs, which amount to €1,406.00 ($1,518.44). This includes:
- €1,228.00 ($1,326.17) for the plaintiffs’ lawyer’s fees.
- €178.00 ($192.23) in additional legal expenses.
Gates must pay these costs within 14 days, or face further penalties. Should Gates fail to comply within the designated timeframe, an additional €92.00, plus service costs, will be added to the total.
Gates will now have to respond to the allegations in Dutch court, with a new hearing set for November 27, 2024.
Read the ruling below obtained by Penny Marie and Zebra Inspiratie:
[Ed.:
55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
Argentine scientists identified 55 chemical elements — not listed on package inserts — in a study of the six major COVID-19 vaccine brands. The research, which confirms previous studies, sparked calls for transparency and further investigation.
OCTOBER 21, 2024 – Editor’s note: The Defender is grateful for the expert input of Chris Exley, Ph.D., and Mike Adams on the research paper that is the subject of this Defender piece. These scientists have pointed out several major flaws in the analysis by Diblasi et al. 2024, including reporting of inappropriate units for vaccine contaminants (i.e., micrograms per liter rather than micrograms per dose) and discrepancies between the measured values of elements in the vaccine vials and the detection limits of the instruments used. We are also thankful for Dr. Martin Monteverde’s response to these criticisms. We believe this type of scientific discourse only serves to advance our cause regarding children’s health.
A group of Argentine scientists identified 55 chemical elements — not listed on package inserts — in the Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm and Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccines, according to a study published last week in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
The chemical elements include 11 heavy metals — such as chromium, arsenic, nickel, aluminum, cobalt and copper — which scientists consider systemic toxicants known to be carcinogenic and to induce organ damage, even at low exposure levels.
The samples also contained 11 of the 15 lanthanides, or rare earth elements, that are heavier, silvery metals often used in manufacturing. These chemical elements, which include lanthanum, cerium and gadolinium, are lesser known to the general public than heavy metals but have also been shown to be highly toxic.
“The detection of multiple undeclared toxic elements, including heavy metals and lanthanides, in COVID-19 vaccines raises a dual and multiplied concern for human health,” James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., a member of the journal’s editorial board who was not involved in the research, told The Defender. “Individually, these chemicals are known to cause neurological, cardiovascular and immunological damage.”
“Together, their synergistic toxicity could exacerbate these risks far beyond what regulators and manufacturers have disclosed or studied,” Lyons-Weiler added.
The research builds on a series of studies conducted since 2021 using different analytic techniques to analyze COVID-19 vaccine vials from major manufacturers. Previous studies also identified significant numbers of chemical elements not listed on vaccine labels.
Research efforts included a 2022 study by a German working group, including the late pathologist Arne Burkhardt, submitted to the German government; a 2021 study by scientists in England; a 2022 study by Canadian Dr. Daniel Nagase; and a 2023 Romanian study by Dr. Geanina Hagimă.
Across those global studies, by the end of 2023, researchers had identified 24 undeclared chemical elements in the COVID-19 vaccine formulas.
Marcela Sangorrín, Ph.D., co-author of the Argentine study, told The Defender these different international studies are important because there is “a significant gap in the quality control of biological products by the national regulatory authorities of each country.”
“This situation is even more urgent and concerning when we consider the rapid advancements observed in cutting-edge biotechnological developments, the complexity of which requires a more thorough legislative and regulatory framework to ensure the safety of individuals who choose to use these therapies,” Sangorrín said.
CDC makes vaccine excipient information ‘almost impossible to find’
For the Argentine study, researchers aimed to corroborate the previous findings of undeclared elements and to detect and measure any elements not identified in those studies.
They analyzed 13 vials from different lots of six brands of the COVID-19 vaccines at a lab at the National University of Córdoba. They used a highly sensitive analytic technique — inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry — which makes it possible to measure elements at trace levels in biological fluids.
The researchers analyzed at least two vials of each vaccine, except for CanSino, a viral vector vaccine made in China, for which they analyzed only one vial.
Their paper included a long list of COVID-19 vaccine components declared by the manufacturers. The components vary by vaccine maker. The researchers obtained the lists through public information requests.
With the exception of Sputnik V and Sinopharm, manufacturers don’t declare the quantities of the named excipients in their vaccines, which the researchers flagged as a “very serious omission at the regulatory level.”
Vaccines often include excipients — additives used as preservatives, adjuvants, stabilizers or for other purposes. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), substances used in the manufacture of a vaccine but not listed in the contents of the final product should be listed somewhere in the package insert.
Listing excipients is important, researchers argue because excipients can include allergens and other “hidden dangers” for vaccine recipients.
OpenVAERS reports that the CDC has made publicly available vaccine excipient information “almost impossible to find.” OpenVAERS offers a comprehensive list of vaccine of excipients by type and by vaccine.
However, the OpenVAERS website also notes that independent tests of vaccine vials have found “contaminants that go well beyond those publicly disclosed by the manufacturers,” as identified in this study.
The researchers found the results of their chemical analysis varied by vaccine and also by vial tested. In some cases, the vials were subjected to repeated testing on different dates and produced slightly different results.
In one lot of the AstraZeneca vaccine, researchers identified 15 chemical elements, of which 14 were undeclared. In the other lot, they detected 21 elements of which 20 were undeclared. In the CanSino vial, they identified 22 elements, of which 20 were undeclared.
The three Pfizer vials contained 19, 16 and 21-23 undeclared elements respectively. The Moderna vials contained 21 and between 16-29 undeclared elements. The Sinopharm vials contained between 17-23 undeclared elements and the Sputnik V contained between 19-25 undetected elements.
82% of vaccines tested contained undeclared arsenic
Overall, researchers identified 55 different undeclared elements across the 17 samples analyzed.
All of the heavy metals detected are linked to toxic effects on human health, the researchers wrote. Although the metals occurred in different frequencies, many were present across multiple samples.
“There are undeclared chemical elements in common, such as boron, calcium, titanium, aluminum, arsenic, nickel, chromium, copper, gallium, strontium, niobium, molybdenum, barium and hafnium in all of the brands” of COVID-19 vaccines, the researchers wrote.
Others, such as chromium and arsenic, which increase the risk of serious cancers and skin diseases, were present as undeclared elements in 100% and 82% of the samples respectively. The researchers also found the lanthanide cerium, which can damage the liver and cause lung embolisms, in 76% of the samples.
These chemical elements are just a few examples of the 62 undeclared chemical elements identified by this study and previous studies combined, the researchers wrote.
They concluded that given the “diversity and notable presence in all brands, along with the peculiar characteristics of the elements found,” is unlikely the findings are due to contamination or accidental adulteration.
‘Utmost urgency’ that governments investigate these products
The researchers, who said the exploratory study was limited by the small sample size, called for a broader analysis of a larger number of samples. They suggested the broader analysis would confirm the trends they identified.
Sangorrín said this should be the work of government researchers.
“It is of utmost urgency that governments around the world conduct relevant investigations into these products, as is typically done in response to quality complaints identified through pharmacovigilance,” she said.
Those seeking justice, she added, must call on the World Health Organization, the pharmaceutical companies and governments to take urgent action, “in accordance with the severity of the situation, given the rise in global mortality rates, recorded adverse effects and the clear demonstration that these products were not developed with the intention of providing immunity.”
The authors underscored the high rates of serious adverse events, including deaths, associated globally with the COVID-19 vaccines. They suggested the adverse events and deaths, which are likely substantially undercounted, could be linked to the toxins they identified.
Lyons-Weiler also called for regulatory action to protect public health.
“Regulatory agencies must take immediate action to halt the use of these vaccines, thoroughly investigate how these toxins were missed, and ensure that the full spectrum of ingredients is transparently declared and the public duly and fully warned,” he said.
“The public’s health can no longer be gambled with in the face of such profound uncertainties.”
Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master’s from the University of Texas at Austin.
Over 200,000 Americans killed by the COVID vaccine: 10 methods, same answer STEVE KIRSCH
Many people have no clue how many people have been killed by the COVID vaccines. I list ten different methods and they all given similar results. You can question each one, but not all 10.
OCT 21, 2024
Executive summary
There are many different ways to estimate the excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines.
Funny thing is, no matter which way you choose, you get the same answer: over 200,000.
The methods
Here is a list of different methods to estimate the number of Americans killed by the COVID shots:
- Big data analysis (Rancourt et al., 78 countries, see p286): 0.00127*672M doses= 853,000 deaths
- Public survey (Skidmore): 217,000 in 2021 alone. No estimate for subsequent years.
- VAERS (How many deaths were caused by the covid vaccines? by UK Professor Norman Fenton): 120,000 + 70,000 = 190,000 deaths minimum.
- Doctors I know personally: Estimates came in consistently at 4 to 5 per 1,000 vaccinated. Since there are 270M Americans who got the shot, this predicts 1.1M deaths.
- Survey of medical practices (46 complete responses): 3 per 1,000 vaccinated by excluding sites claiming 1% or more death rates. This predicts 810,000 deaths.
- Paramedic survey (9 responses): If we ignore all the high reports, the average of the five remaining reporting 5 or fewer COVID vaccine deaths was 2.5. Since there are 100,000 paramedics, this suggests that 250,000 deaths would be a conservative estimate. Ignoring the largest two reports as outliers, the average was 6 suggesting that as many as 600,000 deaths is a ballpark estimate at the true number.
- VAERS estimate: There are over 19,058 American deaths in the US VAERS system (per medalerts.org query). Assuming 70% are caused by the vaccine and an under-reporting factor of 50, we get 670,000 deaths.
- Large geriatric medical practice: Tidewater Family Practice is a medical practice that specializes in the elderly. Their all-cause mortality rates went from 10 a year before the vax rolled out to over 48 deaths in 2023. It’s hard to extrapolate that to a normal population.
- Rasmussen survey: Vaccine deaths were 45% relative to COVID deaths. So given that there were over 1M COVID deaths, this translates into 450,000 COVID deaths. Note that half of America doesn’t think the COVID vaccine killed anyone so we expected this estimate to be lower by a factor of 2 or more.
- Ethical Skeptic analysis of natural cause excess deaths. He found 755K died, constituting a vaccine fatality rate of .33% per person vaccinated which is remarkably close to what the doctors I know estimated (0.4%). He notes the COVID IFR was 0.27%. The baseline for the chart was from 2014 to 2019.
- .Czech Republic data: Moderna had 30% higher 1 year ASMR than Pfizer on an absolute basis. Assuming Pfizer is 100% safe and half of America got Moderna, this would be a 15% ACM increase for 1 year minimum. Since the US mortality is around 3M per year, a 15% increase for one year is 450,000 deaths.
- Jay Bonnar’s statistics: Jay has nearly 15,000 friends in his Outlook contacts and 15 of them died unexpectedly after getting their COVID shots. Jay has only one friend prior to the vaccine rollout die unexpectedly. In addition, he only lost one friend to COVID. So he lost 1 friend per 1,000 vaccinated. So extrapolating, we’d estimate 270,000 COVID deaths. Jay says it’s quite possible he wasn’t aware of all deaths among his friends, so this should be considered a lower-bound data point.
- Denver police officer anecdote: I’m in the process of trying to get confirmation of this via FOIA to the Denver police department, but this is a 50X increase in natural cause deaths after the shots rolled out and I don’t think the police officer is joking about this. I’ve talked to him personally.
One paramedic summed it up very nicely: “I’ve been a paramedic almost 20 years. Since these shots came out I’ve seen things I’ve never seen before, otherwise perfectly healthy young people dropping dead for no reason. It’s been crazy, and I really pray it doesn’t get worse.” See the paramedic and doctor survey.
Summary
Using more than 10 different methods, we estimated a minimum death toll of the COVID shot of 217,000 Americans or more.
Lawmakers should find that extremely troubling.
Base Spike Detox By Dr Frank Yap, M.D.
According to Dr Peter McCullough (in a Twitter post):
September 08, 2024 – Base Spike Detox is what I am currently using in my practice for those who have had COVID-19 multiple times, one or more of the COVID-19 vaccines, or both and believe persistent SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein could be causing problems in their body.
I have arrived, based on the emerging scientific literature (1) and my clinical observation, that three OTC products are essential as a triple base combination:
- Nattokinase 2000 FU (100 mg) twice a day
- Bromelain 500 mg once a day
- Nano/Liposomal Curcumin 500 mg twice a day
Related: Nattokinase, Bromelain and Curcumin from The Wellness Company
Additional products can be added, including NAC, IVM (Ivermectin), HCQ (Hydroxychloroquine), fluvoxamine, low-dose naltrexone, and blood thinners, depending on the clinical evaluation and the syndrome. The therapeutic objective is to start treatment and allow the body to clear Spike and its fragments with the natural reticuloendothelial system. I believe this triple combination is the best approach.
Patients can get a big head start if they self-initiate Base Spike Detox as they get organized for appointments. I have found three months is a minimum duration, and some require more than a year. Don’t expect instant results, be patient.
Important safety warnings include bleeding for those on blood thinners or who have bleeding disorders (e.g., hemophilia), soy allergy, allergies to any component of the combination, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Women of childbearing potential without contraception, pregnant, breastfeeding, and children should not take this combination unless directed by a doctor.
COVID-19 Vaccine Myocarditis Research Wins Award
We’re thrilled to announce that Dr Peter McCullough, won first place on Preprints.org (2) for a study he co-authored on vaccine-induced myocarditis.
Preprints.org is a vital platform for the early dissemination of scholarly research before standard peer review and publication in scientific journals. By allowing research findings to be shared early with the scientific community, Preprints.org facilitates scientific communication and collaboration, enabling researchers to receive feedback and engage with the broader scientific community.
Autopsy Proven Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis (3) claimed the top spot in the ‘Medicine and Pharmacology’ category, specifically focusing on cardiac and cardiovascular systems. This research paper delves into a critical issue surrounding COVID-19 vaccination — the potential risk of myocarditis, particularly in cases where it leads to fatal outcomes.
Nattokinase and Spike Protein
Tanikawa et al (4) examined the effect of nattokinase on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. In the first experiment, they demonstrated that spike was degraded in a time and dose-dependent manner in a cell lysate preparation that could be analogous to a vaccine recipient. The second experiment demonstrated that nattokinase degraded the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. This was reproduced in a similar study done by Oba and colleagues in 2021.
[Ed.: To the McCullough protocol add also Lumbrokinase, it is 30X more powerful than nattokinase! In place of the liposomal curcumin, use a specific product called Curamin Extra Strength (TM).]
New paper shows clearly that COVID vaccines increased mortality in nursing home staff STEVE KIRSCH
A new paper by Girma and Paton shows a dubious, small short lived benefit in initial vaccination in nursing home residents, but the clearest result was an increase in mortality in the staff.
OCT 18, 2024
Executive summary
A new paper by Girma and Paton showed by using machine learning a small but dubious (and short lived) benefit for nursing home residents in 2 of 3 metrics.
But the big news is the impact on the nursing home staff. There, the impact on BOTH covid deaths and all-cause deaths was 100% consistent in all 7 time periods and for each vaccine dose: it always made things worse, and for the primary series, every single one of the 14 measures were highly statistically significant (99% confident).
This is yet another paper showing continuation of COVID vaccination is nonsensical. But the data doesn’t seem to matter and nobody wants to talk about it.
As usual, expect the mainstream media to ignore this important paper as they do for any paper that shows that government officials and health authorities weren’t telling the truth.
Conclusions of the paper
Summarized by this excerpt:
Standard panel data regression estimates do not indicate that higher vaccination take-up reduced mortality in elderly care homes. In contrast, using the DDML approach, we are able to identify some evidence that vaccination may have reduced Covid-related mortality to some extent. This finding is, however, somewhat equivocal: it applies only to two of our three mortality measures and even for those two measures, the effect is only found for the period of the first course of Covid-19 vaccination (i.e. up to September 2021). Even using DDML, we are unable to identify strong evidence that vaccination rates amongst care home staff reduced mortality or that resident vaccination reduced mortality during booster roll out period (from September 2021). Indeed, in the later period, we find some evidence that higher vaccination rates are associated with higher Covid mortality.
My English translation: “Normal methods didn’t show a benefit, so we applied machine learning and found a small benefit (saving the lives of a few people per 100,000 vaccinated), but only in 2 of the 3 measures we used and ONLY in for the first dose and ONLY for residents. But going forward, it’s really clear there is no benefit whatsoever, so we are baffled as to why the healthcare authorities would be pushing a drug that clearly has no benefit whatsoever and which appears to make things worse.”
Impact of COVID vaccination on staff was NEGATIVE and HIGHLY statistically significant
Take a look at Table 6a and 6b. A positive number means it made things worse. This is the rate per 1,000 people in the period. The number in parens is the standard error. If the standard error is small with respect to the value, it is statistically significant. The number of asterisks (*) gives you the amount of statistical significance. One star is low (90% confident), two stars means “statistically significant” (95% confident), and 3 stars means very highly statistically significant (99% confident).
October 18, 2024 Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
Lead Counsel, Aaron Siri, Esq., lays out the details here. [VIDEO 6:03]
During a recent Congressional hearing, we learned that David Morens prided himself on his ability to avoid transparency and purposefully evade FOIA. The hearing revealed emails in which Morens boasted that he “learned from our [FOIA] lady here how to make most emails disappear” and “we are all smart enough to know to never have smoking guns, and if we did we wouldn’t put them in emails and if we found them we’d delete them.”
But in a recent FOIA production obtained by ICAN’s attorneys, we discovered that Morens failed to delete at least one smoking gun. In an April 2020 email to Greg Folkers, Fauci’s Chief of Staff, Morens made an astonishing admission about CDC’s long-term incompetence in handling data and NIH’s willingness to cover it up:
Greg, please keep this confidential but you should know that for over a decade the flu folks at CDC have shockingly messed up their tabulations of flu mortality. We discovered 5-10 years ago that various web page and published data were totally inconsistent and could only be explained by major uncaught errors[.]
… apparently various folks in [t]he flu division made and put up and published mutually-inconsistent figures based on differing subjective assumptions[.]
Several years ago, maybe 4-5, we reached out to the top flu people at CDC informing them that their own data were problematic, that as a sister agency we did NOT want to draw attention to it but work with them privately to fix and reconcile the problems. At first they were grateful, and set up a mechani[sm] to work with us, but then when they discovered the depths of their own mistakes … they did the usual CDC thing and circled the wagons, refused to return calls and emails, etc. [W]e didn’t pursue things but were left unsettled.
To repeat, this was at the level of cdc’s flu leadership. I think we have to accept that they have serious issues and have not fixed them.
Let’s not forget that throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we were told to “trust the experts,” many of whom worked for CDC. Recommendations and edicts handed down from on high at CDC were treated as gospel. The few brave souls who had the courage to publicly question CDC’s judgment were met with derision, pejoratives, censorship, and attacks on their careers and reputations. This makes it all the more infuriating to learn that, according to Morens, the “usual CDC thing” to do when its mistakes are discovered is to ignore the problem and refuse to discuss it—even when the mistake is discovered by another government agency!
But as shocking as CDC’s actions are, let’s not lose sight of the fact that high-level personnel at NIH were aware of the problem and let it slide. NIH’s strategy was to “not draw attention to the problem” and—at the start of a worldwide pandemic in which CDC would have unprecedented power and international attention—to just “accept that they have serious issues and have not fixed them.”
Recall that government policies that destroyed lives relied heavily upon CDC data. If CDC knew “the depths of their own mistakes” and yet relied on the same flawed processes for COVID-19 data collection and processing, then that is scandalous, and perhaps even criminal, behavior.
Interestingly, Fauci’s response to Morens’ email was:
We really need to talk about this. Does this impact their calculations regarding COVID-19, i.e. have they fixed their problem???
The answer to this question is obviously “no,” as seen from ICAN’s past work and exchanges with CDC. But even without ICAN’s prior work related to COVID-19, consider that if CDC can’t figure out how to accurately calculate flu mortality numbers under normal conditions, how can the public ever trust that CDC accurately calculated any COVID-19 statistics.
Unlike the NIH, ICAN will obviously not accept this incompetence and indifference from our taxpayer-funded “health” agencies. We intend to discover exactly who is responsible for this abject failure, what they have done to cover it up, and to hold these individuals—and CDC as a whole—accountable.
To support future legal actions like this, click here to donate!
Spike – Part 2. mRNA injection-induced fibrous clots may be crosslinked fibrin. SASHA LATYPOVA
Brainwashed scientists from UCSF published a paper accidentally explaining the white fibrous clots found by morticians in mRNA vaccine victims worldwide.
OCT 17, 2024 – First a note of gratitude for the notes from paid subs. I can’t answer each and every one, so I am going to say it here – thank YOU! I am reading your notes and I very much appreciate your support. Writing this substack is a full time job. Art is an after hours job. And I love it, or I wouldn’t be doing it. Your messages are inspiring and telling me I should continue, and I will.
A recent paper from UCSF published in Nature, despite efforts of the authors to cover up mRNA vaccine injury, revealed some very interesting findings. It may potentially explain those huge rubbery clots that are being pulled from the deceased vaccine victims by morticians, and on occasion have been extracted from people who are still alive.
Here is an excellent article discussing “People’s Blood Clot Survey” with harrowing statistics about these clots:
These clots are not assembled from the contents of the vials, but only “ignited” by them as will be explained below. There is not enough volume of the injectable to account for such large structures, so these clots contain accumulated human tissue for the most part.
Major findings from the USCF study:Fibrin and fibrinogen bind to the spike protein and form proinflammatory blood clots.
- Clots drive systemic thrombo-inflammation, micro- and macro-clotting & brain pathology.
- Loss of natural killer (NK) cells is seen & explains increase in cancer.
Some basic facts about fibrin and fibrinogen:
“Don’t be stupid: Skipping your COVID booster could reduce your IQ” ANDREAS OEHLER
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t?
OCT 17, 2024 – Just-in-time for the fall booster campaign for the smart ones! “Opinion: Don’t be stupid: Skipping your COVID booster could reduce your IQ” (LA Times, 2024.10.14):
Much has been made of COVID’s consequences for overall health, productivity and the economy. But recent research suggests a compelling new basis for vaccine advocacy: COVID’s capacity to reduce intelligence.
Using data from more than 100,000 people who completed online tests in England, the authors of a study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that those recovering from COVID, including those with only mild symptoms, had measurable cognitive deficits. Even participants who had “mild COVID-19 with resolved symptoms” exhibited deficits “commensurate with a 3-point loss in IQ” compared with uninfected participants.
That’s the sequel to the old adage used a year ago for the 2023’s fall booster campaign, shaming the unvaccinated stupid:
Without further ado, let’s peek into the not-so-recent study itself and see how this sausage was made. “Cognition and Memory after Covid-19 in a Large Community Sample” (Published February 28, 2024, N Engl J Med):
We estimated a global cognitive score across eight tasks. We hypothesized that participants with persistent symptoms (lasting ≥12 weeks) after infection onset would have objectively measurable global cognitive deficits and that impairments in executive functioning and memory would be observed in such participants, especially in those who reported recent poor memory or difficulty thinking or concentrating (“brain fog”).
In our study cohort, we tracked the prevalence of infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing Covid-19, in England from May 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022,12-15 using data from a randomly selected community sample of 3,099,386 adults (≥18 years of age). Between August 1 and December 30, 2022, we invited a subsample of 800,000 adults (32.1%) to complete a follow-up survey7 and cognitive assessment (Table S1 and Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).
We considered the participants to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 if they had received the vaccine at least 14 days before infection.
And there you have it! As we all know by now, the act of “vaccinating” was a major factor in becoming SARS-CoV-2 positive back in the day:
The Pfizer Papers: Prizer’s Crimes Against Humanity DR NAOMI WOLF
The Foreword to our Historic, Lifesaving New Book
OCT 17, 2024
Our book, The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, was published two days ago; it is already a bestseller. This is a book that three governments — the US, the UK and Australia — all sought to suppress. The story of how it came to be is extraordinary — 3250 highly credentialed doctors and scientists under the leadership of one extraordinary woman, Amy Kelly, worked for two years on the 450,000 internal Pfizer documents released under court order by a successful lawsuit by attorney Aaron Siri. In the process these volunteers confirmed the greatest crime against humanity of all time. Read on.
Introduction by Naomi Wolf
This book in your hands is the result of an extraordinary set of confluences. It also presents, in a format available in bookstores for the first time, material that has already changed history.
You are about to embark as a reader on a journey through an extraordinary story—one whose elements almost defy belief.
The Pfizer Papers is the result of a group of strangers—ordinary people with extraordinary skills, located in different places around the world, with different backgrounds and interests—who all came together, for no money or professional recompense at all; out of the goodness of their hearts, and motivated by love for true medicine and true science—to undertake a rigorous, painfully detailed, and complex research project, which spanned the years 2022 to the present, and which continues to this day.
The material they read through and analyzed involved 450,000 pages of documents, all written in extremely dense, technical language.
This far-flung, relentlessly pursued research project—under the leadership of DailyClout’s COO, the remarkably gifted project director Amy Kelly—brought one of the largest and most corrupt institutions in the world, Pfizer, to its knees. This project, pursued by 3,250 strangers who worked virtually and became friends and colleagues, drove a global pharmaceutical behemoth to lose billions of dollars in revenue. It balked the plans of the most powerful politicians on earth. It bypassed the censorship of the most powerful tech companies on earth.
This is the ultimate David and Goliath story.
The story began when lawyer Aaron Siri successfully sued the Food and Drug Administration, to compel them to release “The Pfizer Documents.” These are Pfizer’s internal documents—as noted above, 450,000 pages in number—that detail the clinical trials Pfizer conducted in relation to its COVID mRNA injection. These trials were undertaken to secure the ultimate prize for a pharmaceutical company, the “EUA,” or Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA. The FDA awarded EUA for ages 16+ to Pfizer in December 2020. The “pandemic,” of course (a crisis in public health that a book of mine, The Bodies of Others, confirmed, involved hyped and manipulated “infections” data and skewed mortality documentation) became the pretext for the “urgency” that led the FDA to bestow EUA on Pfizer’s (and Moderna’s) novel drug. The EUA is the hall pass, essentially, allowing Pfizer to race right to market with a not-fully-tested product.
The Pfizer Papers also contains documentation of what happened in “post-marketing,” meaning in the three months, December 2020 to February 2021, as the vaccine was rolled out upon the public. All leading spokespeople, and bought-off media, called the injection “safe and effective,” reading from what was a centralized script.
Many people who took this injection, as it was launched in 2020–2021–2022 and to the present, did not realize that normal testing for safety of a new vaccine—testing that typically takes ten to twelve years—had simply been bypassed via the mechanisms of a “state of emergency” and the FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorization.” They did not understand that the real “testing” was in fact Pfizer and the FDA observing whatever was happening to them and their loved ones, after these citizens rolled up their sleeves and submitted to the shot. As we can never forget, many millions of these people who submitted to the injection were “mandated” to take it, facing the threat of job loss, suspension of their education, or loss of their military positions if they refused; in some US states and overseas countries, people also faced the suspension of their rights to take transportation, cross borders, go to school or college, receive certain medical procedures, or enter buildings such as churches and synagogues, restaurants and gyms—if they refused.
Please Help Prevent a Medical Miscarriage of Justice A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
The reprehensible story behind Shaken Baby Syndrome covering up vaccine induced infant deaths.
OCT 16, 2024 – In this publication, I have made the case that there is over a century of evidence that sudden infant death syndrome (all of which is comprehensively detailed here) is linked to excessive vaccination of infants.
The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
MAR 21, 2024
In that article, I provided extensive references for the following points:
•SIDS “mysteriously” clusters at 2 to 4 months of age—which is also when children happen to receive the vaccines most strongly associated with causing SIDS (e.g., the TDwP pertussis vaccine). Many doctors and patients noticed this, but it has been relentlessly dismissed by the medical industrial complex.
•As far back as 1933, case reports were produced of children experiencing brain damage and then infant death shortly after the TDwP shot. (e.g., a 1978 report that studied 15 million TDwP injections linked numerous cases of the vaccine to brain damage and death).
•In 1979, the CDC also completed its own analysis 1980 of 23 deaths within 28 days of DTwP vaccination, 12 (52.2 %) occurred within 24 hours, and 18 (78.3 %) occurred within one week. In 16 of the 23 deaths, autopsy findings were consistent with SIDS. Of the 16 SIDS deaths, 6 (37.5 %) occurred within 24 hours, and 12 (75 %) occurred within one week.
•A 1982 study that was inspired by observing 4 cases of SIDS within 19 hours of the TDwP vaccine that then studied 200 randomly selected SIDS cases. They found most of infants had been vaccinated prior to death (6.5% within 12 hours of vaccination, 26% within 3 days, 37% within a week, 61% within two weeks, and 70% within 3 weeks), with death typically following brief periods of irritability, crying, lethargy, upper respiratory tract symptoms, and sleep disturbance. Additionally, their autopsy findings were relatively consistent (e.g. petechiae of lung, pleura, pericardium, and thymus; vascular congestion; pulmonary edema; pneumonitis; and brain edema).
•In 2014, mass graves were unearthed for Irish orphans who coincidentally had been test subjects for the early diphtheria vaccine in the 1930s.
•In addition to there being countless cases of children receiving those vaccines and dying suddenly later in the night, many cases also exist of two twins both dying within 24 hours of the vaccine (e.g., the earliest was in 1946, while this article reviews 13 cases of simultaneous twin SIDS deaths)—something which is almost impossible to have occurred by chance. Additionally, in many cases (e.g., this 1987 one, this 2007 one, this 2010 one, and this 2013 one) of twins who died after vaccination and were found dead lying on their backs.
Note: I believe the immediate twin deaths were likely due to them both receiving a hot vaccine lot (which as I show here, was a longstanding problem with the TDwP vaccine—for example, in 1978-1978, 11 babies in Tennessee were found to have died within 8 days of a TDwP vaccine, 9 of whom received the same lot—leading the US government to privately acknowledge the deaths may have been due to the vaccine and the manufacturer issuing a memo to spread future lots throughout the country so hot lots would no longer cluster in an area and cause identifiable SIDS outbreaks). One of the truly remarkable things about these events was that the FDA rejected the manufacturer’s proposal to put SIDS on the warning label for the vaccine (although since that time it has been implemented).
Survey Reveals Over One in Six Germans Report Side Effects from COVID-19 Vaccination By Jim Hᴏft
Oct. 16, 2024 7:15 am – As the world reflects on the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, alarming new data from Germany reveals that the experimental COVID vaccines, may have left far more harm in their wake than originally acknowledged.
A recent survey conducted by the Forsa Institute shows that over one in six Germans report experiencing side effects from their vaccination—an undeniable red flag that mainstream media continues to downplay.
The representative survey conducted on behalf of the German newspaper “Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung” (NOZ) and the online magazine “Multipolar,” polled 1,002 individuals on October 7 and 8.
According to the survey results, more than one in six Germans has experienced side effects due to the COVID-19 vaccine.
A significant 17 percent of respondents openly stated they did not “tolerate the COVID vaccination well overall.” This figure challenges the widespread narrative of “safe and effective” vaccinations promoted by health agencies worldwide.
Meanwhile, 10 percent of respondents reported not receiving the vaccine.
Though 73 percent reported no adverse reactions, the data still leaves a considerable group of Germans facing unsettling vaccine side effects.
The survey also reveals that 40 percent of Germans support a Bundestag inquiry into the government’s COVID-19 policies and vaccine rollout, demonstrating a substantial demand for answers on how the pandemic was handled.
However, with 58 percent dismissing such a probe as unnecessary, the government’s narrative has swayed a slim majority.
An open invitation to resolve the vaccine misinformation problem STEVE KIRSCH
No takers, but I keep trying! I’ll be trying again tomorrow at a public meeting in Santa Clara. Please come in person and support my request!
OCT 15, 2024
Executive summary
Misinformation costs lives. This will not be resolved through intimidation or censorship. It must be resolved through civil scientific dialog. Unfortunately, not a single health authority, anywhere in the world, is willing to engage in such a discussion. But I keep trying.
I’ll be making a pitch tomorrow (Wednesday Oct 16 at 2pm) at the start of the Health and Hospital Committee/Federal Affairs public meeting in Santa Clara at 70 West Hedding Street at 2pm. Public comments are at the START of the meeting so be prompt and it won’t take long.
Please join me and speak for 30 seconds in support of my efforts to resolve this important problem.
Introduction
When you type in “misinformation superspreader” into Google, I’m not just the top hit anymore… I’m the first 3 top hits! How cool is that? Finally, I found something I’m good at ;).\
[Ed.: Been there, done that, wore the tee-shirt!]
New Covid Admission Highlights Intelligence Community Attack on Trump JEFF CARLSON & HANS MAHNCKE
Fauci worked behind the scenes to undercut Trump as the Intelligence Community coordinated to discredit Trump’s Lab Leak disclosure
OCT 15, 2024 Truth Over News https://truthovernews.org/ – John Ratcliffe, the former Director of National Intelligence recently acknowledged that he had discovered in May 2020 that our intelligence community was aware from the beginning that Covid originated from a laboratory. Ratcliffe’s statement is important because it directly contradicts the intelligence community’s Covid origin statement that was issued (for two very specific reasons) on April 30, 2020.
Ratcliffe’s comments came during a Heritage Presentation on Holding China Accountable for their role in the Covid pandemic. During the presentation Ratcliffe recalled that one week before formally assuming the position of DNI in May 2020, the intelligence community released a statement claiming to back the so-called “scientific consensus” that Covid was naturally occurring.
After Ratcliffe formally assumed the position of DNI he requested to see the underlying intelligence that backed the Intelligence Community’s assessment. However, upon review of the intelligence, Ratcliffe was deeply surprised to discover that “the vast preponderance of [the intelligence] said exactly the opposite…it pointed toward this being a research-related incident, not naturally occurring.”
Ratcliffe told the audience that the CIA has still not acknowledged a Lab Leak origin for Covid and seemed to strongly indicate that none of this was done in error:
“The notion that some four and a half years later, [the CIA] is not capable of making an assessment [on COVID’s origins] with some degree of confidence…reflects that there are political considerations and financial considerations that have prevented that. But that’s not a good reason not to be honest and forthright with the American people and with the rest of the world.”
Ratcliffe’s comments (54:05 – 55:31) are very much worth the watch. [https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-izv4be6ss 1:o4:09]
Ratcliffe is right. We know that the CIA worked to falsely reshape the debate on the origin of Covid to point away from a lab leak and towards a natural origin. A senior-level CIA officer even told Congress that the Chief Operating Officer of the CIA provided financial inducements to six CIA analysts to change their minds on the origin question. Originally, the six analysts had concluded that Covid came out of a lab but they later amended their conclusion to say that the origin could not be determined.
Why did this happen and what was driving the pressure on the analysts to reverse their opinions? Why was it so important for the CIA – and for the wider intelligence community – to cover up the truth about Covid?
Does spike protein exist? -Part 1 SASHA LATYPOVA
OCT 15, 2024 – I receive a lot of questions about spike protein. Some people are claiming it doesn’t exist, because viruses don’t exist. However, existence of a synthetic or natural protein is not predicated on the existence of any viruses.
This theoretical entity now has its own Wikipedia page. Spike protein is claimed as part of the “corona” of the theoretical entity called SARS-cov-2. It is claimed that the spike protein of the original “Wuhan variant” of covid looks like this:
This structure is not real. It is a modeled, averaged, idealized computer model. Protein folding is a hugely complex unsolved problem in biology. There is not enough computing power in the universe to solve it so that the protein structures could be accurately predicted, and no, AI is not going to solve it either. That’s another fundamental reason why it is impossible to build pandemic-causing viruses in labs, but it’s a separate topic I will try to address at a later date.
The specific spike modeled above has not been found in nature. Same as with an AI-generated human face, no such human exists! While this does not mean humans don’t exist, still, you can’t use an AI-generated face for any purposes where a real identity is required.
The way the spike protein computer model above is constructed was described in my post from about a year ago.
The vaccine science cartel communicate with neat-looking cartoons, and thus most lay public and most lazy-thinking professionals do not understand that these cartoons have very little to do with reality.
Pharma’s claim they can make these perfect, precise little things every time. This is the rationale behind “boosters” for “variants”. Because, you see, if X% of this little shape is not the same, it’s a “variant” and your previous shot is no good now, you need to get another shot. All of this is baloney, of course. They can’t precisely PCR these things because PCR is a 200 chemicals/50 steps/no validation cooking exercise + a computer modeling technique, with internal circular referencing and much manual manipulations – i.e. a great method to commit science fraud. Thus the “variants” are simply the inability to reproduce the previous chemical cooking and computer modeling. And so, when pharma spews out some biological product, here is the analogy from the automotive industry on how this looks:
Rare Magnetic Earth Metals in COVID-19 Shots May Explain Magnetic Humans KAREN KINGSTON
A peer-review study confirms that rare earth metals used to create super magnets are undisclosed ingredients in the ‘COVID-19 vaccines,’ potentially explaining the magnetic humans phenomenon.
October 15, 2024: Yesterday, InfoWars reported on a recently published study in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research (IJVTPR) confirming that there are ‘at least 55 undeclared chemical elements found in the COVID-19 vaccines,’ including toxic metals, radioactive elements, and ‘11 cytotoxic lanthanides (rare earth metals) used in electronic devices and optogenetics.’
Rare Earth Metals (Lanthanides) are Used to Create Super Magnets for Nuclear Reactors, Windmills, Smart Phones and Electronic Vehicles
Lanthanides, also known as ‘rare earth metals’ have unique electromagnetic properties that have established them as the cornerstone of the internet-of-things and many advanced technologies, including; nuclear reactors, smart phones, fiber optics, lasers, windmills, and electronic vehicles (EVs). Rare earth lanthanides are also used to create the highly powerful, permanent magnets found in Elon Musk’s Neuralink and the motors of Tesla electronic vehicles.
What Rare Earth Metals Were Found in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID-19 Injections?
Nine (9) rare earth metals were found in the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injections.
Moderna contained 7 rare earth metals, including Neodymium.
Rare Earth Metals Used to Create Super Powerful Neo-Magnets
Per the 2024 US Geological Survey (USGS), the US purchased thousands of tons of rare-earth magnet block materials including Neodymium (found in the Moderna ‘vaccine’).
Neodymium magnets (or neo-magnets) are the strongest permanent magnets losing less than 5% of their strength over 100 years. Neo-magnets are used to write data into cells of a hard drive and to carry and convert sound waves in headphones and speakers.
According to a national magnet retailer, neo-magnets are so powerful that they can “crush fingers, break bones, cause internal bleeding if swallowed, be a hazard to the eyes, and cause death.”
[Ed.:
Port Hedland Council Votes to Expose ‘DNA Contamination’ in mRNA Vaccines, Demands Immediate Suspension of COVID-19 Shots Nationwide By Jim Hᴏft
Oct. 14, 2024 9:15 am – Western Australia—Port Hedland Council takes bold action, voting to expose DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines. With five members reporting adverse effects, this decision could ignite a national health crisis response!
This article originally appeared on Gaz’s Substack and was republished with permission and edited by The Gateway Pundit.
Report on the Port Hedland Special Council Meeting, October 11, 2024
The Special Meeting convened by the Port Hedland Council on October 11, 2024, marked a watershed moment in the ongoing national debate surrounding DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly Pfizer and Moderna’s products.
This highly anticipated session was called in response to mounting evidence of DNA contamination, presented by experts such as Dr. David Speicher, alongside a series of letters from MP Russell Broadbent. The gravity of the concerns raised, along with the council’s proactive stance, has drawn attention not only within Western Australia but across the entire nation.
Background: DNA Contamination Concerns
The meeting was initiated following increasing public unease about potential DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines. Dr. David Speicher’s report, which was central to the discussion, revealed that the contamination levels in these vaccines were up to 145 times higher than the acceptable safety limits set by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).
This contamination was found to include fragments of synthetic DNA, raising significant concerns about the risks of genomic integration, immune system disruptions, and potentially increased rates of cancer and hereditary defects.
In response to these findings, MP Russell Broadbent had already written to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, calling for the immediate suspension of mRNA vaccines.
Broadbent’s letters, backed by a cohort of 52 health experts, added weight to the argument, further urging the government to address the regulatory failures and protect public health.
Port Hedland Council’s decision to consider the matter was viewed as a potential turning point in the national discourse, especially as they prepared to send warnings to all 537 local councils across Australia, compelling them to confront this looming health crisis.
Public Testimonies and Community Impact
The public session of the meeting began with a series of impassioned statements from community members. Residents of Port Hedland expressed deep concerns about the adverse health impacts they had witnessed following the vaccine rollout.
-
- John Ashenden, a long-time resident, emotionally recounted the recent loss of a friend who developed aggressive cancer within a matter of weeks after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. He lamented the rising number of similar cases in Port Hedland and stressed the urgency of the council acting on the newly revealed scientific data. His message was clear: the community could not afford inaction any longer.
- Sharon Van, a prominent local funeral director, also took the floor to share her firsthand experience. She noted a sharp rise in the number of deaths, particularly within the Aboriginal community, following the vaccine’s introduction. Sharon raised concerns about the disproportionately high death rate among younger individuals and highlighted the unique vulnerabilities faced by Aboriginal people, many of whom she said had been coerced into receiving the vaccines. She urged the council to protect the community from further harm by addressing the DNA contamination issue.
- Matt Maysoffered a deeply personal testimony about the loss of his partner to cancer just months after she received her second vaccine dose. His words resonated powerfully with the room, highlighting the emotional toll of losing a loved one so rapidly and unexpectedly. He emphasized that the council had a responsibility to act on behalf of those who could no longer speak for themselves, calling the situation a “silent tragedy” unfolding across the country.
- Jillian Fisher, another resident, provided additional scientific insights, backing up the claims made by Dr. Speicher. She detailed how the contamination of mRNA vaccines had been confirmed by geneticist Kevin McKernan and emphasized the potential long-term risks. She explained how the synthetic DNA fragments could integrate into human genomes, potentially causing genetic mutations and increasing the risk of cancer. Jillian stated that the contamination levels were “alarmingly high” and well beyond safe thresholds.
These public testimonies played a significant role in framing the discussion for the council members, as they underscored the real-life consequences of the contamination concerns and bolstered the argument for immediate action.
Council Deliberations and Expert Testimonies
Once public input concluded, the council proceeded to a closed session where they viewed a video presentation, which reportedly included expert testimony from Professor Angus Dalgleish, an oncology and immunology specialist from St. George’s University of London.
Professor Dalgleish’s message was clear: the synthetic DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines was contributing to an alarming rise in aggressive cancers.
His findings linked the contamination to the disruption of tumor suppressor genes and the activation of oncogenes, raising profound concerns about long-term public health implications.
Following the viewing, the council resumed the public session, where Councillor Adrian McRae, who had been instrumental in leading the discussion, delivered a forceful presentation.
McRae reiterated the severity of Dr. Speicher’s findings, emphasizing that the contamination levels were not just marginally elevated but were 145 times higher than what the TGA had deemed acceptable.
He argued that such levels of contamination posed serious risks, including genomic integration, cancer, immune system disorders, and hereditary defects that could be passed on to future generations.
Motion and Key Points of Debate
The motion put forward during the meeting proposed sending formal letters to all local councils across Australia, health authorities, and federal officials, demanding the immediate suspension of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines.
The motion also called for the widespread dissemination of Dr. Speicher’s report to ensure that health practitioners were fully informed of the risks before administering any further doses of these vaccines.
The motion sparked a lengthy and sometimes heated debate. Mayor Peter Carter, who ultimately voted against the motion, argued that public health issues of this magnitude should be left to state and federal authorities.
He expressed concern about the potential fallout, both reputationally and financially, should the council pass the motion.
Carter warned that such a stance could result in funding cuts from state or federal governments, particularly if the council was perceived to be overstepping its jurisdiction.
In response, Councillor McRae and his supporters dismissed these concerns, stating that the health and safety of the community must take precedence over financial or political considerations.
“We are not here to protect our budget; we are here to protect our people,” McRae said. He emphasized that the council had a moral obligation to act, particularly in light of the new scientific evidence.
The Deciding Vote and Outcome
After hours of debate, the final vote was held. The motion passed with a 5 to 2 majority, with Mayor Carter and one other council member voting against it.
The five votes in favor represented a decisive mandate for action, reflecting the council’s commitment to addressing the health risks associated with DNA contamination in the vaccines.
The passing of the motion means that Port Hedland Council will now begin the process of sending formal letters to over 500 councils across Australia, urging them to consider the evidence presented by Dr. Speicher and demanding the suspension of the mRNA vaccines.
In addition, letters will be sent to the Prime Minister, state health authorities, and health practitioners within Port Hedland, calling for immediate investigations into the contamination and its potential health impacts.
Implications for National Health Policy
Port Hedland’s decision to take such a bold stand could have far-reaching consequences.
As the first local government to officially challenge the safety of the mRNA vaccines based on DNA contamination, Port Hedland has set a precedent that other councils may follow. This could potentially lead to a wave of similar motions across the country, increasing pressure on Canberra to acknowledge the issue and take action.
Furthermore, the public’s growing distrust in federal health regulators, such as the TGA, is likely to intensify as more councils begin to confront these findings.
Port Hedland’s motion may also force federal authorities to reexamine the testing protocols currently in place for mRNA vaccines and address the growing public health concerns before they escalate into a national crisis.
Conclusion
The Special Meeting on October 11, 2024, was a landmark moment for Port Hedland and, potentially, for Australia.
The council’s decision to take a stand on DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines reflects not only the concerns of its community but a broader national unease about vaccine safety. With five out of eight council members reporting adverse events after vaccination, the decision to act was not just a matter of policy but of personal conviction.
As the council moves forward with its plan to alert local governments and health practitioners across the country, the ramifications of their decision could be felt far beyond Port Hedland.
The question now is whether other councils will follow their lead—and whether Canberra will finally break its silence on this critical issue.
The action taken by the Port Hedland Council is a wake-up call for communities across Australia. Now, more than ever, it’s crucial for people to stay informed and act. Share this information widely, alert your local councillors, and demand that they address the serious concerns raised about DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines. By speaking up, we can ensure that this issue receives the attention it deserves and push for transparency and accountability in our health system. Don’t wait for others—this is the time to take action for the safety of our communities.
US data shows COVID vaccinated kids 5 – 18 die at a 5.7X higher rate than their unvaccinated peers STEVE KIRSCH
Comorbidity differences perhaps? Nah, I’m not buying it and I’ll show you why. Also, new New Zealand FOIA results show a 5X increase in < age 40 in cardiac ER calls post vax rollout!
OCT 13, 2024
Executive summary
A new paper published in the peer-reviewed medical literature (Yang) looking at over 300,000 kids aged 5-18 (mostly in the US) shows a highly statistically significant 5.7X higher mortality rate for those who opted to get vaccinated. The authors didn’t mention that at all. Furthermore, when they were asked about it, they refused to comment on it. So I will.
I’ll show you that the overall susceptibility to disease in the two groups was very similar, yet the mortality (measured from one month after the PCR test that was used as the index date for enrollment until 1 year post enrollment) was 5.7X higher in the group that was vaccinated at the time of enrollment.
Secondly, a new FOIA response in New Zealand shows nearly a stunning 5X increase in cardiac-related ER visits in those under age 40 after the COVID shots rolled out from 4406 in 2020 to 21416 in the first full year after the shots rolled out. That’s a Z-score of 256 which means something very serious is causing this; it is in no way a statistical fluke.
Each of these should cause health authorities to investigate. But in today’s society, you could be fired for asking questions like this. So many people will continue to believe the vaccines are safe.
The Yang paper showed a 5.7X higher mortality in vaccinated kids 5-18
Alex Berenson first wrote about this 11 days ago, but I ran into it independently, verified it all independently, and then later found out about his article.
He was absolutely right to call attention to it. It’s stunning.
Alex also points out that there were higher comorbidities in the group that was vaccinated prior to enrollment in the trial. I totally agree. But I’ll go one step further and show you why this cannot explain the 5.7X higher mortality.
About the study:
- Use TriNetX global database (mostly US kids)
- Ages 5 to 18 with average age around 12
- There was a vaxxed and unvaxxed cohort defined based on vax status prior to the index date.
- The propensity matching was ONLY within the COVID / non-COVID of each cohort.
- The two cohorts were NOT propensity matched to each other. t
- The vaccinated cohort (Cohort 2) had higher comorbidities than the unvaxxed (Cohort 1), but the COVID vs. non-COVID groups were matched.
- The index data (enrollment date) was based on PCR test results.
- Vax status was set at index time.
- The index date was between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022 and was set at the day of the test.
- 10.Participants were followed for 1 year post-enrollment, but the 30 days post COVID test period was ignored.
- 11.You can only find the death numbers of the two groups buried in the Supplement 1 of the paper. It should have been noted in the abstract as the differences are stunning. I guess they wanted their paper to be published rather than rejected.
- 12.The paper itself made no mention of the fact that the vaccinated kids died at a 5.7X higher rate than the unvaccinated kids. It was only in a table in the Supplement and the authors didn’t call attention to it.
- 13.As Berenson noted in his Substack, the authors refused to comment on the death differences between the groups. So this wasn’t an “oversight.” They just do not want to talk about it. In science, you can get fired for opposing the narrative.
For me and my misinformation spreader friends, the heart of this paper is completely buried in Supplement 1, a Word document that most people will never see. Here it is:
New England Journal of Medicine: study confirms viral promoter with SV40 sequence causes cancer! SASHA LATYPOVA
Skysona, a $3M/dose FDA-approved gene therapy causes cancer. Guess what it has in common with covid shots?
OCT 13, 2024 – A recent paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that BlueBird Bio’s gene therapy Skysona (aka eli-cel), approved by the FDA in 2022, causes cancer in approximately 10% of the treated population:
We performed integration-site analysis, genetic studies, flow cytometry, and morphologic studies in peripheral-blood and bone marrow samples from patients who received eli-cel therapy in two completed phase 2–3 studies…
…Hematologic cancer developed in 7 of 67 patients after the receipt of eli-cel…
Conclusions
Hematologic cancer developed in a subgroup of patients who were treated with eli-cel; the cases are associated with clonal vector insertions within oncogenes and clonal evolution with acquisition of somatic genetic defects.
In an editorial published alongside the data, Cynthia Dunbar, a hematologist at the NIH’s National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, wrote that more cases may appear over time.
Even more interesting – it was known that eli-cel causes cancer before the drug was approved. In fact, it almost didn’t get approved and the company almost went out of business because of this.
In 2021 Bluebird Bio halted the trial for eli-cel after finding that the treatment likely caused a cancer-like condition in one patient. A boy with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD) was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome, a condition that can develop into leukemia, after receiving eli-cel. Two other patients were also being monitored for similar symptoms, and the FDA has put a clinical hold on eli-cel trials.
At the same time, the Cambridge based biotech also reported that it failed to reach an agreement with European governments. The German government offered ~$800K while the company wanted a $1.8M price tag.
Subsequently, Bluebird warned investors that its limited cash reserves, given its burn rate, raised “substantial doubt regarding its ability to continue as a going concern” and laid off 30% of its workforce.
Then, miraculously, the clinical trial hold due to cancer cases was lifted and Skysona was waved through by the FDA under an accelerated approval, meaning that Bluebird was allowed to sell its drug for $3M/treatment in the US, while the requirements for reporting full clinical trial results were pushed out to “after”. The approval was based on a post-hoc data analysis (a data fishing exercise) that managed to find a very minor improvement in functional scores at 24 months. This is as shaky as it gets. The FDA included a black box warning for the cancer “side effect”, but the company was free to sell the drug to desperate patients, while continuing to experiment on them.
Deliberate induction of anaphylaxis by vaccination KATHERINE WATT
Sept. 10, 2024 discussion by James Delingpole and Sasha Latypova, condensed transcript
OCT 12, 2024
Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law
Induction of anaphylaxis by vaccination
Sept. 10, 2024 discussion by James Delingpole and Sasha Latypova
Video links
- Sept. 10, 2024 – Anaphylaxis by vaccination (Substack)
Sept. 10, 2024 – Anaphylaxis by vaccination (Rumble) - Sept. 10, 2024 – Anaphylaxis by vacccination (BitChute)
Full transcript
- Sept. 10, 2024 – Anaphylaxis by vaccination, James Delingpole and Sasha Latypova (PDF)
Related reporting and analysis.1
Sasha Latypova, welcome back to The Delingpod…just remind everybody who you are and what you do.
My name is Sasha Latypova. I’m now an independent writer on Substack, and I write a publication called Due Diligence and Art, and it has to do mostly with health, public health fraud, and countermeasures and COVID vaccines, which are countermeasures and all sorts of associated issues. But also as part of my work, I look at all kinds of related topics and trying to understand the history, trying to understand what happened. In my previous life, I was a pharmaceutical executive and I worked for about 25 years in pharma R&D, running clinical trials for all kinds of companies, including Pfizer, was a client for many years. And, I got to learn—
JD
How many innocent people have you killed, do you think?
SL
None. Actually, zero. My work, especially last, I would say — well, I had several companies. Initially, we were doing imaging data analysis in imaging trials. Looking at standard imaging techniques, but making them more accurate for purposes of drug development, which was, if you image cancer in oncology, or you image arthritis in the knee, we were working on better techniques of measuring those images.
Then the last decade or so, I worked with a company that did cardiovascular safety screening. So we were actually preventing the drugs from killing people by excluding them from pipelines of pharmaceutical companies.
Because we could tell early from animal data or from early human data that this drug is going to be potentially dangerous for arrhythmia. So we would screen them out so that they won’t go on the market and kill people.
And in our clinical trials, it was so, so tightly controlled and monitored. It was absolutely, no, we never had even severe adverse event or anything like that.
And so that’s why I was shocked when I started looking into this area, into vaccines and realizing it’s completely unregulated. It’s not regulated at all as I was expecting it to be regulated.
And so that was the main finding, and that’s why I and my colleague Katherine [Watt] are now writing about this, about how these products are not regulated and how they’re actually systematically poisoning people by pretending that these are pharmaceuticals and they’re not regulated like pharmaceuticals.
JD
Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines MERYL NASS
2 gutsy companies (Arcturus and CSL) test drive their first-in-class vaccine in Japan–and how this ties in with the 100 day vaccine promise of CEPI and the globalists
OCT 12, 2024
Bottom line: there are no long-term data on these vaccines. And since they might produce the spike protein, an indisputably dangerous toxin, indefinitely, it would be crazy to use this vaccine. But since the era of COVID began, the precautionary principle was thrown out, and the more risks a vaccine manufacturer and regulator take, the better, it seems.
Here is what the manufacturer Arcturus claims as the benefits of this vaccine:
- it requires a much lower dose for the same degree of antibody production
- it continues to induce the production of more antigen (spike protein) for a longer duration than existing mRNA vaccines like Comirnaty
I have long explained (for 25 plus years) that vaccines are unsuitable as a response to bioterrorism (or for that matter, rapidly mutating viruses) because you don’t know what the infectious agent will look like ahead of time, nor what the immunogenic epitopes on it will be—the area against which a vaccine is directed. So you can’t design a vaccine ahead of time.
Furthermore, it takes years to assess the safety, efficacy and proper dose of a vaccine. So by the time you have been able to prepare and manufacture a vaccine the pandemic or biowarfare epidemic has come and gone.
Below is a [pre-COVID] CDC chart designed to show what happens during the 10-15 year it takes to develop a vaccine. Most vaccine candidates never make it to licensure because they are not safe or effective or require too high a dose to be economic.
ABLECHILD: Psychiatric Drug Cocktails – Risky Experiments on Human Minds By Joe Hoft
Oct. 10, 2024 8:30 am – Despite zero understanding of how even one psychiatric drug “works” as “treatment” for alleged mental disorders, the rate of cocktail (polypharmacy) drugging among children is increasing. One doctor called for informed consent about the benefits and risks associated with the “contraindicated” drugging.
A recent study from Lawrence Kleinman, professor of pediatrics at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, reviewed Medicaid data for more than 141,000 patients (under 21) receiving any psychiatric medication and found that nearly 400 of those patients received at least one “potentially dangerous combination” of psychiatric drugs.
Dr. Kleinman warned that “good practice demands that patients and caregivers be informed of and assent to risks and benefits, including informing them that the intended pair of medications is typically contraindicated.” What Kleinman is warning is that there are serious risks to prescribing cocktails of psychiatric drugs and it is not recommended.
According to Kleinman’s research, polypharmacy (more than one drug prescribed together) is a common practice, with nearly 38 percent of patients in the study filling two or more medications with at least one month overlap, generating more than 11,000 distinct drug combinations.
Kleinman found that the most contraindicated combination involved the antipsychotic Ziprasidone, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the “treatment” of schizophrenia and bipolar. And the research further revealed that “other risky combinations involved antidepressants such as Fluoxetine (Prozac) and Trazodone paired with various antipsychotic medications…”
This isn’t the first of its kind research as a report in February of this year showed that kids in the state of Maryland also are receiving cocktails of psychiatric drugs at ever increasing rates. Yes. It’s a veritable behavioral chemical lobotomy for America’s children at the whim of the prescribing doctor, despite the serious risks associated with such prescribing.
According to the Maryland research conducted by University of Maryland School of Pharmacy graduate student Yueh Yi Chiang, between 2015 and 2020, those children under the age of 17 were receiving “multiple psychiatric drugs during that time that rose from 4.2% in 2015 to 4.6% five years later.” And sadly, those kids who were disabled or in foster care “were significantly more likely than individuals with low income to receive three or more psychotropic classes overlapping for 90 days or more.”
Three or more psychiatric drugs at one time? How is this prescribing not criminal? Physicians are abundantly aware of the serious risks associated with cocktail drugging, especially in light of the fact that not one doctor has even a clue about how these drugs “work” in the brain as “treatment.”
According to an article on Axios “The Puzzle of Matching Psychiatric Drugs to Patients,” by Caitlin Owens and Alison Snyder, doctors cannot figure out how best to prescribe psychiatric drugs because there is no understanding about the disorders.
According to Owens and Snyder, “despite decades of research and millions of dollars in investment, there’s been limited success treating depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and other disorders.” The writers further explain that “treating these disorders is often a trial-and-error process that can unnecessarily expose people to side effects of a drug, or combination of drugs, that may be irrelevant.” Or harmful.
The bottom line is that there is no science to support even one psychiatric disorder. There is no X-ray, CAT scan, blood test, urine test that will reveal an objective confirmable abnormality in the brain that is any psychiatric diagnosis. There is no science to show that depression, anxiety, bipolar, ADHD or schizophrenia, to name a few, are brain abnormalities.
Now add to that the psychiatric mind-altering drugs that are used as “treatment” for these alleged brain disorders. If one reviews the FDA’s approval of all psychiatric drugs like antidepressants, antipsychotics, and stimulants there is no understanding about how the drugs “work” to “treat” the alleged disorder.
Now they’re going for microRNAs JESSICA ROSE
What are the implications of this?
OCT 09, 2024 – MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA regulatory molecules that play critical roles in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. They bind complementary sequences in messenger RNA thus messing with translation and protein production. miRNAs are approximately 21-23 nucleotides in length and are found in plants, animals, and some viruses.1
miRNAs have been implicated in almost everything biology including development, differentiation and stress responses. They also play roles in the regulation of cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and metabolism, so they’re pretty important for little dudes considering they don’t code for anything.2 Isn’t it ironic that they are coded but don’t code? They: effect.
Kind of like a piece of driftwood in the way of clean line of a wave – in its presence, can’t surf the line. I asked Venice.ai to draw a surfer on a clean wave with a piece of driftwood in the way and it gave me this. But I digress.
Dysregulation of miRNA expression can be associated with numerous diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, and metabolic disorders.3 This is the reason why miRNAs are emerging as ‘promising therapeutic targets’ for the treatment of disease, whereby some are exploring the potential of miRNA-based therapies, such as miRNA mimetics and antagomirs, to modulate miRNA expression and “restore normal gene expression patterns” in disease.456
The other day, Victor Ambros, PhD, professor of program in molecular medicine at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, and Gary Ruvkun, PhD, professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School received the 2024 Nobel Prize for discovery of microRNA. You can read about that here.
I have been in this ‘game’ long enough to see where this is going and I don’t like it. Why can’t hubristic men stop trying to play God? Cancer, just as one grant-sexy example, is a metabolic disorder and we don’t need to mess with genetic factors to ‘fix it’.
Don’t get me wrong; it’s not that I have anything against these scientists and researchers – I am sure they are excellent and have benevolent intentions – but it is the misuse and abuse of their discoveries by bureaucrats and business men that bugs me, and quite frankly, that I find simply dangerous.
Does mRNA Vaccination Support a Future One World Government? [51:44] PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough on the Feds for Freedom Podcast
OCT 10, 2024 – Could repeated mRNA vaccination every six or twelve months with no end in site have purposes beyond theoretical protection from infectious diseases? Why does the WHO Immunization Agenda 2030 stipulate new 500 vaccines to be introduced in low and middle income countries? Why use hashtag #VaccinesWork? Is it because they may not work?
We explore these questions and more on the Feds for Freedom Podcast with conservative host Ms. Stephanie Edewaard Weidle.
How can you tell which studies are right and which ones are wrong? STEVE KIRSCH
A large study in the UK shows only vaccinated kids got myocarditis. But the medical community claims that the risk is higher from COVID. They can’t both be right.
OCT 10, 2024
Executive summary
My misinformation spreader friends and I have always maintained that nearly all the myocarditis cases and deaths are caused by the COVID shots.
Now, a new large study, not yet published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, confirms that. 100% of the myo/pericarditis cases were in kids who were vaccinated. 100%!!!
This shows that the experts can get completely opposite results on questions of great importance.
How do you decide who is telling you the truth? You have to do your own data collection.
The paper
OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents
There were 1.66M kids in this study; nearly half (49.4% ) were unvaccinated; the rest had one or more doses of the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
Not one unvaccinated child was found to have myocarditis or pericarditis.
On the other hand:
Let’s do the math!
Let’s use the table from the paper (last two rows):
Flight From Seattle to Istanbul Makes Emergency Landing in New York After Pilot Dies Mid-Flight By Cristina Laila
Oct. 9, 2024 2:00 pm –
A flight from Seattle to Istanbul, Turkey made an emergency landing in New York on Wednesday morning after one of its pilots died mid-flight.
A Turkish Airlines pilot “lost consciousness” mid-flight forcing the co-pilot to reroute to JFK in New York.
Turkish Airlines confirmed Capt. İlçehin Pehlivan, 59, died before the plane landed after medical intervention failed to resuscitate him.
The pilot was in perfect health and had his last health examination in August. [Emphasis added]
“Having worked at Turkish Airlines since 2007, İlçehin PEHLİVAN was 59 years old. A periodic health examination was carried out on 08.03.2024 at the Aviation Medical Center authorized by the General Directorate of Civil Aviation, and no health problem was detected that would prevent him from working,” Turkish Airline’s senior vice president of media relations said on X.
Flight 204 was traveling from Seattle to Istanbul when it was diverted to John F. Kennedy International Airport for an emergency landing at approximately 6 a.m. after “one of the pilots suffered a medical emergency,” according to the Federal Aviation Administration.
Capt. İlçehin Pehlivan “lost consciousness” during the flight, and after initial medical intervention proved ineffective, the co-pilot was rerouted to JFK, where the Airbus A320 safely landed, the airline said in a statement.
Turkish Airlines also confirmed that Pehlivan died before the plane touched ground. Since it was a long-haul international flight, two other pilots were on board at the time.
Upon landing, the aircraft was met by emergency personnel, according to airport authorities.
[Ed.: His August exam must have missed something!]
September 24, 2024 FLCCC ALLIANCE – Tammy and her sister Sandy were very close. In October, 2021, after two weeks in hospital with COVID. Slowly getting stronger Sandy was offered remdesivir. Tammy, who had researched remdesivir told her, “Absolutely not, do not take remdesivir.” So she told the doctor she didn’t want it., He said, “Well, then you must want to die.” When Tammy said ask for ivermectin, Sandy was told that was not part of what they prescribed. Tammy tells us about her sister Sandy, so she isn’t forgotten. Please watch and share.
Did you or your loved ones have a similar experience? You can email us fortherecord@flccc.net to start a conversation, we would love to tell it.
You’re not actually “following the science” unless you’re also following the money.
October 5, 2024 Wikileaks
▪️ Big Pharma pays doctors
▪️ Big Pharma pays researchers
▪️ Big Pharma pays politicians
▪️ Big Pharma pays the FDA
▪️ Big Pharma pays lawyers
▪️ Big Pharma pays lobbyists
▪️ Big Pharma pays the media
▪️ Big Pharma pays celebrities
▪️ Big Pharma pays Big Tech
[Ed.:
Official US Nursing home data shows that the COVID vaccines did NOTHING to reduce COVID mortality. ZERO. STEVE KIRSCH
The CFR didn’t decline after the COVID vaccines were deployed. This means that the vaccines didn’t work! The CDC lied, people died.
OCT 04, 2024
The CDC lied. People died.
The COVID vaccine had no benefits
- It actually increased your risk of getting COVID. We know that from the Cleveland Clinic study.
- It did nothing to reduce your risk of hospitalization. We know that from the data revealed in a study published in JAMA by a top epidemiologist at the VA.
- The vaccine did absolutely nothing to reduce your risk of dying from COVID. I’m going to show you that below. It’s crystal clear. Rarely in science do you see anything that is this perfect.
In short, the COVID shots were all downside with no benefits. The vaccines and the vaccine mandates cost a lot of people their careers or their lives.
It was a massive con job by the FDA and CDC to make us believe that the vaccines worked when their own numbers show that it didn’t do a damn thing. In fact, I’d bet that they probably didn’t even look at their own numbers from CMS.
No upside, all downside.
My new analysis of the US nursing home data is undeniable
The US Nursing home COVID mortality data is gold standard per-facility data on the most vulnerable population for COVID. There is nothing in the world better than this dataset.
I’ve written about the US Nursing home data many times before (most recently in this article), but now I have a new way to present the data that shows the full story instantly:
What does it show? It shows the vaccines did NOTHING to reduce mortality. Zero. Zilch. Nada. It’s not even a close call. It’s OBVIOUS from just looking at one graph.
Vaxxed III. Was the medical system authorized to kill patients? MERYL NASS
I have not seen it yet–I will tomorrow–but something fishy was going on. What was it?
OCT 03, 2024 – Tomorrow evening “Vaxxed III: Authorized To Kill” will premiere online for the first time for FREE!
If you missed the sold-out premiere in theaters last month, here is your chance to see the film that is already being banned across the country and making headlines.
Please join Children’s Health Defense Films and Vaxxed Films for our free online premiere. To view the film, please sign up with your email address in advance.
“Vaxxed III: Authorized To Kill” Online Premiere
Friday, October 4, 2024
7 p.m. ET (4 p.m. PT)
Once you sign up, you will receive a follow-up email on Friday with a direct link to watch the virtual event on Friday.
If you aren’t able to tune in tomorrow night, you can still sign up at the link above to get email notifications on how to watch “Vaxxed III” after the online premiere!
In solidarity for transparency and health freedom,
The Children’s Health Defense Team
In the US, you can go to jail for disclosing record-level vaccination data STEVE KIRSCH
Privacy is more important than data transparency of public health records. So we have to trust the public health agencies. Are you feeling safer now?
OCT 03, 2024
Executive summary
In the US, HIPAA laws prevent disclosure of dates, only years are allowed in record-level data.
From 45 CFR § 164.514(b)(2)(i)(C), dates have to be years including date of birth, death, and service.
So the vaccine manufacturers don’t have to worry about record-level PHI being made available to the public anytime soon in the US.
Alternatives
There isn’t anything to prevent public health authorities from publishing:
- Detailed time-series cohort analyses like I did with the New Zealand and Czech Republic data.
- Summary analyses by 5 year age groups, brand, and sex of mortality at 90, 180, 270, 360, etc. days after each vaccine dose.
And yet, nobody does it. The code to create these analyses is freely available on the Internet.
Summary
HIPAA protects your privacy and it also protects the public from knowing how deadly the COVID vaccines are.
It enables the US government to kill hundreds of thousands of Americans and avoid detection.
Health authorities can keep all this information out of public view.
Do you feel safer now?
Covid vaccines associated with ALL cases of heart inflammation in children in a large UK health dataset SASHA LATYPOVA
OCT 01, 2024
This paper has been published in peer review.
Conclusions of this observational study in ~800K children and adolescents in the UK: covid vaccines had no efficacy and were associated with ALL cases of myocarditis and pericarditis! Anyone injecting kids with this garbage is simply poisoning them for no reason at all. You can read for yourself:
Open SAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents
Colm D Andrews[1] , Edward P K Parker[2] , Elsie Horne[4] , Venexia Walker[4] , Tom Palmer[4] , Andrea L Schaffer[1] , Amelia CA Green[1] , Helen J Curtis[1] , Alex J Walker[1] , Lucy Bridges[1] , Christopher Wood[1] , Victoria Speed[1] , Christopher Bates[3] , Jonathan Cockburn[3] , John Parry[3] , Amir Mehrkar[1] , Brian MacKenna[1], Sebastian CJ Bacon[1] , Ben Goldacre[1] , Miguel A Hernan[5] , Jonathan AC Sterne[4] , The OpenSAFELY Collaborative, and William J Hulme[1] .
[1]Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
[2] London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
[3] TPP, TPP House, 129 Low Lane, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 5PX, UK
[4] Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
[5] Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
Abstract:
Background Children and adolescents in England were offered BNT162b2 as part of the national COVID-19 vaccine roll out from September 2021. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of first and second dose BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents in England.
Methods:
With the approval of NHS England, we conducted an observational study in the OpenSAFELY-TPP database, including a) adolescents aged 12-15 years, and b) children aged 5-11 years and comparing individuals receiving i) first vaccination with unvaccinated controls and ii) second vaccination to single-vaccinated controls. We matched vaccinated individuals with controls on age, sex, region, and other important characteristics. Outcomes were positive SARS-CoV-2 test (adolescents only); COVID-19 A&E attendance; COVID-19 hospitalisation; COVID-19 critical care admission; COVID-19 death, with non-COVID-19 death and fractures as negative control outcomes and A&E attendance, unplanned hospitalisation, pericarditis, and myocarditis as safety outcomes.
Results:
Amongst 820,926 previously unvaccinated adolescents, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for positive SARS-CoV-2 test comparing vaccination with no vaccination was 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.75), although the 20-week risks were similar. The IRRs were 0.60 (0.37-0.97) for COVID-19 A&E attendance, 0.58 (0.38-0.89) for COVID-19 hospitalisation, 0.99 (0.93-1.06) for fractures, 0.89 (0.87- 0.91) for A&E attendances and 0.88 (0.81-0.95) for unplanned hospitalisation. Amongst 441,858 adolescents who had received first vaccination IRRs comparing second dose with first dose only were 0.67 (0.65-0.69) for positive SARS-CoV-2 test, 1.00 (0.20-4.96) for COVID-19 A&E attendance, 0.60 (0.26-1.37) for COVID-19 hospitalisation, 0.94 (0.84-1.05) for fractures, 0.93 (0.89-0.98) for A&E attendance and 0.99 (0.86-1.13) for unplanned hospitalisation. Amongst 283,422 previously unvaccinated children and 132,462 children who had received a first vaccine dose, COVID-19-related outcomes were too rare to allow IRRs to be estimated precisely. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalisation were slightly higher after first vaccination (IRRs versus no vaccination 1.05 (1.01- 1.10) and 1.10 (0.95-1.26) respectively) but slightly lower after second vaccination (IRRs versus first dose 0.95 (0.86-1.05) and 0.78 (0.56-1.08) respectively). There were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group. Fewer than seven (exact number redacted) COVID-19-related critical care admissions occurred in the adolescent first dose vs unvaccinated cohort.
Among both adolescents and children, myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups, with rates of 27 and 10 cases/million after first and second doses respectively. Conclusion BNT162b2 vaccination in adolescents reduced COVID-19 A&E attendance and hospitalisation, although these outcomes were rare. Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.
“Myocarditis and pericarditis ONLY in vaccinated”
“Protection against a positive TEST – transient”
you read this correctly!
McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Fundamental in Resolving Long-COVID and Managing Vaccine Injury Syndromes: International College of Integrative Medicine 40th Cellular Detoxification Conference
SEP 30, 2024 – Please enjoy this continuing medical education lecture delivered at 40th Cellular Detoxification Conference sponsored by International College of Integrative Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana, on September 7 2024.
There are no medicine grand rounds or primary care conferences addressing this topic. It is a white space in medicine where no academic medical center has a fundamental approach to handling about 5-10% of the population suffering from post-acute sequalae after recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 infection. Both load the body with pathogenic Spike protein which incites inflammation, oxidative stress, coagulation, and all the downstream effects that result in symptoms.
Because I have taken the ultimate accountability for McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification (BSD) by publishing and copyrighting it in my own name, I can tell you first hand I get feedback about perceived safety and efficacy on a regular basis from all over the world. I am pleased to report that responses indicate this is the best approach for now until there are large, prospective, double-blind placebo controlled randomized trials of combinations of agents that measure meaningful outcomes. To my knowledge, no such trials have been planned as of yet. A search for long-COVID studies testing nattokinase, one of the principal components of BSD, found no records.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
President, McCullough Foundation
Rep. Gosar Introduces Groundbreaking Bill to End Big Pharma’s Liability Shield for Vaccine Injuries By Jim Hᴏft
Sep. 27, 2024 8:30 am – Rep. Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S. (AZ), has introduced H.R. 9828, the End the Vaccine Carveout Act.
This legislation seeks to strip vaccine manufacturers of the immunity they have enjoyed for decades, leaving countless victims of vaccine injuries without legal recourse.
Gosar’s proposal is a monumental step in addressing the unfair protections afforded to pharmaceutical giants, who have raked in billions while hiding behind legal shields.
Big Pharma has used legal strategies to reduce its liability in court. One such strategy is utilizing the PREP Act, which shields biopharmaceutical companies from lawsuits related to products used in public health emergencies, including vaccines.
The PREP Act, passed in 2005, grants pharmaceutical companies immunity from lawsuits for products used to combat public health emergencies.
This Act has been utilized to shield companies like Pfizer and Moderna from legal liability for any unintentional issues arising from their COVID-19 vaccines.
Another one is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, which established a no-fault system in the U.S. to compensate individuals for injuries caused by vaccines while also shielding pharmaceutical companies from most lawsuits related to vaccine injuries.
This act aimed to stabilize the vaccine supply and encourage the development of new vaccines.
“Under current law, it is nearly impossible to hold vaccine manufacturers liable for injuries caused by vaccines due to a 1986 law that unfairly created a special immunity carveout for Big Pharma, making it very difficult for vaccine-injured victims to win in a court of law,” said Rep. Gosar.
“My legislation strips away current immunity provisions unfairly shielding Big Pharma from the harms caused by their products and allows those injured by vaccines to pursue a civil lawsuit in state or federal court. Big Pharma doesn’t deserve a get-out-of-jail-free card for injuries caused by their harmful vaccines.”
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which provides compensation to people who believe they were injured by a vaccine.
Pfizer is Being Sued Around the World KAREN KINGSTON
Pfizer is being dragged into courts across Europe and the United States. On Wednesday, London’s High Court ruled in favor of Moderna in that Pfizer violated Moderna’s intellectual property rights.
SEP 26, 2024 – In a lawsuit against Pfizer over two Moderna patents for the COVID-19 mRNA injections, REUTERS reported that London’s High Court ruled that while of one of Moderna’s patents was invalid; Pfizer did, in fact, infringe upon another Moderna mRNA patent that was valid.
The court ruled that Moderna is entitled to royalties on COMIRNATY sales after March of 2022 and that Pfizer has the right to appeal this ruling.
Per their annual reports, in 2022 Pfizer reported $37.8 billion in COMIRNATY sales, $11.2 billion in 2023, and according to FiercePharma, Pfizer is forecasting $5 billion in COMIRNATY sales in 2024.
For the sake of ‘entertainment’ at a hypothetical 12% royalty fee, Pfizer could owe Moderna as much as $6 billion.
In unrelated news, in February of 2023, Moderna was ordered by a US court to make $400 million in subsidiary payments to scientists at the NIH, Dartmouth, and Scripps La Jolla for the invention of spike protein.
Pfizer is Being Sued Around the Globe
REUTERS goes on to report that, “The London lawsuits are just one leg of a global battle between Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna, which have also been involved in proceedings in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and the United States, as well as at the European Patent Office.”
The US Government Asserted that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Injections Were an Original Invention per the US Government Contract
It will be interesting to see how the courts rule in the US cases regarding Pfizer’s infringement on Moderna’s patents considering that the US government asserted in their contract with Pfizer that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injections were an original invention of Pfizer’s and a trade secret.
Pfizer Can Be Sued. Please Join the Movement.
Moderna is one of many entities that are suing Pfizer. GSK is suing Pfizer. Texas is suing Pfizer. Kansas is suing Pfizer. In total, 5 States are suing Pfizer. Psalm 52:6-7
The righteous will see and fear, and will laugh at him, saying;
“Behold, the man who would not make God his refuge, but trusted in the abundance of his riches and was strong in his evil desire.”
In 1917 Rudolf Steiner Predicted “Vaccines Will Destroy People’s Souls”
More than a hundred years ago, Rudolf Steiner wrote the following:
“Eliminate The Soul With Medicine”
“In the future, we will eliminate the soul with the medicine.”
Rudolf Steiner
Under the pretext of a ‘healthy point of view’, there will be a vaccine by which the human body will be treated as soon as possible directly at birth, so that the human being cannot develop the thought of the existence of soul and Spirit.
To materialistic doctors, we will be entrusted the task of removing the soul of humanity.
As today, people are vaccinated against the disease of that disease, so in the future, children will be vaccinated with a substance that can be produced precisely in such a way that people, thanks to this vaccination, will be immune to being subjected to the “madness” of spiritual life.
He would be extremely smart, but he would not develop a conscience, and that is the true goal of some materialistic circles.
With such a vaccine, you can easily make the etheric body loose in the physical body.
Once the etheric body is detached, the relationship between the universe and the etheric body would become extremly unstable, and man would become an automation, for the physical body of man must be polished on this Earth by spiritual will.
So the vaccine becomes a kind of arymanique force; man can no longer get rid of a given materialistic feeling. He becomes materialistic of constitution and can no longer rise to the spiritual.”
It’s Something in the Water: EPA Confirms Fluoride Exposure Linked to Lower IQ in Children By Miriam Judith
Sep. 26, 2024 8:45 am – This week a federal judge ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over concerns about the currently recommended fluoride levels in drinking water throughout the country.
Judge Edward Chen issued the ruling on Tuesday, citing a recent review by the National Institutes of Health which concluded that higher levels of fluoride may be linked to lower IQ in children.
“In all, there is substantial and scientifically credible evidence establishing that fluoride poses a risk to human health; it is associated with a reduction in the IQ of children and is hazardous at dosages that are far too close to fluoride levels in the drinking water of the United States,” Judge Chen wrote in his ruling.
If the ‘experts’ at the NIH are admitting something so shocking, the evidence must be overwhelming.
Unfortunately, it is. Studies going back decades have backed up the claims, but they have largely been dismissed and ignored.
From the NIH report:
“The NTP monograph concluded that higher levels of fluoride exposure, such as drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter, are associated with lower IQ in children. The NTP review was designed to evaluate total fluoride exposure from all sources and was not designed to evaluate the health effects of fluoridated drinking water alone. It is important to note, however, that there were insufficient data to determine if the low fluoride level of 0.7 mg/L currently recommended for U.S. community water supplies has a negative effect on children’s IQ.
The NTP uses 4 confidence levels – high, moderate, low, or very low – to characterize the strength of scientific evidence that associates a particular health outcome with an exposure. After evaluating studies published through October 2023, the NTP Monograph concluded there is moderate confidence in the scientific evidence that showed an association between higher levels of fluoride and lower IQ in children.
The determination about lower IQs in children was based primarily on epidemiology studies in non-U.S. countries such as Canada, China, India, Iran, Pakistan, and Mexico where some pregnant women, infants, and children received total fluoride exposure amounts higher than 1.5 mg fluoride/L of drinking water. The U.S. Public Health Service currently recommends 0.7 mg/L, and the World Health Organization has set a safe limit for fluoride in drinking water of 1.5 mg/L. The NTP found no evidence that fluoride exposure had adverse effects on adult cognition.”
This ruling puts a spotlight on the alarming consequences of excessive fluoride exposure, especially for the most vulnerable among us—our children.
The movement against high fluoride levels also mirrors broader health initiatives to regulate toxins in drinking water and food supply of Americans.
Rather than respecting individual liberties and allowing families to choose what they consume, government agencies often impose blanket regulations without acknowledging the harm they cause.
Activists like RFK Jr. have been shining a light on what many perceive as a government-sanctioned assault on the health of Americans via agencies such as the FDA which green-lights the distribution of toxic and addictive chemicals in our food.
WATCH
The recent ruling by Judge Edward Chen stands as an important moment in America’s ongoing battle against the unchecked power of federal agencies like the EPA and FDA which seem to only serve as a detriment to public health.
ABLECHILD: 1970 Hearing Reveals ADHD as Government-Funded Drug Experiment on Children by Joe Hoft
Sep. 26, 2024 8:00 am – In 1970 a lawmaker wanted to know if the federal government had a hand in drugging school-age children that largely has today remained an unspoken, well-funded, uncontrolled clinical drug trial.
September 29, 1970, New Jersey Congressman Cornelis E. Gallagher held a hearing into the federal government’s role in promoting the use of amphetamines and Ritalin as behavior modification of grammar school children. Fifty-four years later, AbleChild applauds Representative Gallagher for presiding over the House Special Studies Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations investigation as it was one of the first hearings to draw attention to the government’s funding of experimental drug research using school-age children.
Gallagher wanted to know from the experts how it was okay to drug children with amphetamines and Ritalin to modify behavior in school, while at the same time pushing an active national campaign against drug abuse stating that “speed kills.” The Congressman was concerned about whether the drug therapy being used by the child would become a permanent part of the child’s school record, thus years later negatively impacting the child’s life. And, finally, the Congressman raised concerns “about the mislabeling of the child and packaging an ill-conceived program as an answer to our ills in the education of our children.”
At the time of the 1970 hearing, researchers were then labeling hyperactive children with Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MDA), then renaming it as Hyperkinetic disorder (HKD) or Hyperkinesis and finally settling on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). At the time of the hearing, none of the experts testifying could provide any scientific data proving the alleged brain abnormality existed. Still, fifty-four years later, there is no science to prove the alleged brain abnormality ADHD exists.
Ironically, one of the experts that testified at 1970 hearing warned that the drug therapy would “zoom” from its then usage in approximately 200 to 300 thousand American children. The prophecy was fulfilled. In 2020 alone, 9,585,203 Americans were taking some form of psychiatric mind-altering drug as “treatment” for the alleged ADHD. Almost four and a half million Americans between the ages of 0 and 24 alone were prescribed ADHD drugs in 2020.
The “experts” testifying before Gallagher’s subcommittee were as clueless then as the “experts” are today when it comes to any understanding of how the drugs worked as “treatment.” For example, Dr. Ronald Lipman testified during the 1970 hearing that “I think there are many gaps in our present knowledge. I don’t think we know as much about the neurological mechanisms underlying the action of these drugs as we might.”
If Lipman were being honest, he would have admitted that the “experts” then, like today, simply did not know how the drugs “work” as “treatment” for the alleged MDA, Hyperkinesis or ADHD. After all, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which approves drugs for use, the mode of action for Ritalin (methylphenidate) still, fifty-four years later, “is unclear.” The same is true for amphetamines as the FDA reports “the exact mechanism of amphetamines as a class is not known.”
But the real threat came from the parents of children who provided testimony about the coercion and harassment experienced at the hands of school officials to have their children referred or recruited into a drug program. The issue, as explained by those testifying, was that this kind of coercion on the part of school officials became a kind of uncontrolled drug experiment.
Again, moving forward, nothing has changed in fifty-four years, only accelerated. Gallagher reported during the hearing that the federal government had appropriated $3 million in grants for mental health research in 1970. A funding amount that today would be referred to as budget dust. But the funding increased exponentially and, as of 2020, the federal government spends an estimated $280 billion annually on mental health services.
And, like those raising concerns back in 1970 about schools becoming involved in the drugging of children to modify behavior, the same concerns are being raised today. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act will dump hundreds of millions of dollars into School-based mental health, including implementing, enhancing, and expanding school-based mental health programs. Reading, writing, and drugging.
These school-based mental health programs were exactly what Congressman Gallagher feared would happen if federal mental health funding was left unchecked. The only difference is that fifty-four years after Gallagher’s insightful hearing, parents and students are not necessarily coerced or harassed into participating in a drug experiment but, rather, are joyfully encouraged to take advantage of the services freely provided by government funding.
Either way, children who participate in this new school-based mental health scheme still are part of an uncontrolled drug experiment paid for by federal funding. And two other things have not changed. There still is no science to support ADHD as a brain abnormality or any other psychiatric disorder, and the FDA still has no idea how the drugs used as “treatment” actually “work” in the brain.
Gallagher would be rolling in his grave if he knew the federal government’s involvement in child drugging. In 2023, the federal government provided funding to the tune of $131.7 million in grant programs that connect youth and families to behavioral health services and $55 million to expand access to mental health care for young people, including access to mental health care in schools.
It’s fair to say that Gallagher knew too well that this mental health train wreck would occur. Sadly, despite Gallagher’s efforts to ensure the federal government would not contribute to, or participate in, any school program that would contribute to the drugging of children, today it is almost completely the federal government that pays for mental health research in the form of grants and hundreds of millions of dollars appropriated directly to mental health programs in schools.
Make no mistake, the largest funder of research on mental health disorders is the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and Medicaid is the single largest payer for mental health services in the U.S. It should be no surprise then that the total private investment that flows into mental health services from all private sources amounts to approximately $65 million, leaving one to conclude that if it weren’t for federal taxpayer dollars, the mental health industry would be non-existent.
And, as Gallagher and his committee anticipated, school-age children are being drugged at ever-increasing numbers and, sadly, mental health services continue to be federally funded at new highs every year. The problem, of course, is that despite more than fifty years of government funded mental health and drug research, no one is getting better. Seems like it’s time for another hearing.
My Talk in Harlem Last Week, and the Child Victims of Fauci’s Sadistic Tortures BRUCHA WEISBERGER
The Fight Against Unfathomable Evil
SEP 25, 2024
BS”D
Last Thursday, ReformPharma held a very important event in NYC, specifically to protest the CDC’s diabolical recommendations of covid vaccinations to babies.
I would like to share with you the talk that I gave at the rally – and some truly horrifying revelations I found afterwards which reinforce everything I mentioned on Thursday.
Some people may take offense at my calling out CDC Director Mandy Cohen in the strongest terms. That is too bad. Mandy has shown the world clearly who her mentors are:
Here is the text of my speech:
Good afternoon, friends. I am here because I am furious. I am furious that babies, who are created in the image of G-d, are being murdered. I am furious that their trusting, naïve parents are being convinced by government misinformation to poison their own children with deadly covid injections. I am furious that a woman named Mandy Cohen, the head CDC puppet, is giving horrific recommendations that parents shoot their 6 month old babies up with covid and flu vaccines.
As head of the Center for Disease Control, Mandy no doubt has the data showing that out of 1.6 million children studied, myocarditis and pericarditis occurred ONLY among those who received the covid vaccine.
From Mandy’s perch in the CDC she is surely aware, also, that the covid shots have caused an 9.5% increase in the death rate in children 14 and under in the US.
Other data, from the UK, reveals that covid-vaxxed kids are 45 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children. [Emphasis added]
CANCER diagnoses and deaths – including rare cancers in children and young people – have skyrocketed since the introduction of the covid shots. In fact, babies are even being BORN with cancer because of their mothers’ covid vaccination in pregnancy.
What term can there be for injecting this product into children, other than the olden-times idol-worshipping cult of Molech child sacrifice? AND, we can reach no other objective conclusion than this: Someone has HIRED Mandy Cohen to give DEADLY advice to the parents of the United States.
I am appalled and disgusted by Mandy, whose recommendations, to those who naively trust her, go directly against G-d and the Torah.
G-d’s seal is TRUTH, and G-d runs the world with kindness and compassion. G-d requires us to copy Him and act with compassion towards ALL living things – and MOST of all toward human beings, who are created in the image of G-d. WE ARE COMMANDED TO NEVER HARM ANOTHER PERSON! MANDY, HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN? Human lives are NOT DISPOSABLE!
If there is any soul left in you, MANDY, let me show you, from G-d’s own book, how far He expects us to extend compassion. In the Torah, Deuteronomy Chapter 22, Verse 10, the portion which was read in the synagogue last Sabbath, we are instructed by G-d, “Do not plow with an ox and a donkey together.” The great Rabbi, Baal Haturim, explains that this commandment is given out of G-d’s great compassion for the feelings of an ANIMAL. The ox regurgitates its food and chews it up and swallows it over again, while the donkey does not. If they work together, the donkey will see the ox re-chewing the food, and incorrectly believe that the ox was just fed, while he was ignored by the farmer. Because of the emotional pain the donkey will feel, G-d tells us that we aren’t allowed to put these two animals to work together. This is a MAJOR lesson that we’re being taught – to conduct our entire lives with MERCY for every living thing – and people are the most important of all.
MANDY, clearly you have forgotten G-d and you have forgotten the Torah. Nobody with an ounce of fear of the Creator could preach to parents to give babies a deadly, fake vaccine for which they have no need, which is INEFFECTIVE, and which makes them MORE likely to get sicker with the very disease it is supposed to protect from – an injection that has killed thousands of children already, and at least hundreds of thousands of human beings, globally. Nobody who has faith in the next world and the fiery punishment meted out there would be repeating the crazy LIES that you do, pretending that teenage boys have a higher rate of myocarditis from covid than from the covid vaccine! MANDY, HAVE YOU NO SHAME? You KNOW that AMBULANCE CALL RATES FOR CARDIAC problems were NOT higher DURING THE HEIGHT OF COVID, but SKYROCKETED AFTER THE VACCINE ROLLOUT!
The Scientific Formula that Guarantees People Will Voluntarily Give Up their Freedoms KAREN KINGSTON
Why did Americans surrender their freedoms so easily? Why did we agree to submit ourselves and our children to house arrest and the psychological and emotional abuse that comes along with isolation?
September 24, 2024: This report provides behavioral insights as to why Americans welcomed the forfeiture of human rights throughout COVID. Please share this free report.
November 29, 2023: Why did Americans surrender their freedoms so easily? Why did we agree to submit ourselves and our children to house arrest and the psychological and emotional abuse that comes along with isolation? Why did we agree to cover our faces and our children’s faces with masks? Covering a person’s facial expressions is another form of emotional abuse, especially to children. KAREN KINGSTON
JANUARY 15, 2023
Critical insights into behavioral social science research explains why not only Americans, but citizens around the globe voluntarily forfeited their God-given freedoms in exchange for believing that they were acting as responsible members of their communities and for feelings of safety and protection.
Originally Published January 23, 2023: I believe in the good will and intelligence of humanity. Americans and global citizens were terrorized and manipulated into giving up our rights out of fear of infecting our loved ones with a highly-deadly pathogen. A pathogen that we were told could harm us or our loved ones. When people are afraid, they don’t act rationally. Irrational thinking is a normal reaction to fear; and global government leaders knew this.
Terrorizing global citizens with COVID-19 propaganda around the SARS-CoV-2 virus and spike protein, in order for us give up our sovereignty and freedoms was a well-orchestrated and studied strategy. There is even a scientific name for this strategy; it’s called the “Parasite Stress Hypothesis.”
Per the Parasite Stress Hypothesis, when a community or nation is exposed to the threat of a highly-deadly pathogen, at an individual level, the majority will each submit to an authoritarian government and condemn others for not doing so.
People who trusted in their governments were terrorized and manipulated into giving up their freedoms, thereby allowing an authoritarian government to emerge.
A government that is not constitutionally accountable to the people has emerged in America. I discuss the impact of COVID-19 and the parasite-stress phenomena on Americans and the new authoritarian government that is gaining power in our nation on May 12 of 2022 at the Clay Clark, Reawaken Tour.View here.
In this 2 minute video, Dr. Jordan Peterson discusses the Parasite Stress Hypothesis during his class lecture at Toronto University.
The Vast Pharmaceutical Conspiracy to Silence Dissent Online A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
Millions of dollars were spent to weaponize the public against all of us
SEP 25, 2024
Story at a Glance:
•There has been a coordinated campaign to attack and defame anyone who has spoken out against the COVID-19 response. This has primarily been restricted to social media (e.g., getting people deplatformed) but it has also been weaponized in real life (e.g., getting medical licenses revoked).
•This coordinated campaign was the result of a “non-profit” known as The Public Good Project (PGP), which was actually directly linked to the pharmaceutical industry. The PGP used the industry funding it received to defend industry interests.
•Vaccine safety advocates were able to get into the group where these campaigns were coordinated. There, they discovered numerous public figures working hand in hand with healthcare workers to descend like a hive of bees on anyone “promoting misinformation.” Likewise, we learned that the most belligerent doctors we keep encountering on Twitter belonged to these groups.
•Some of the influencers advancing PGP’s message through “Shots Heard” (and its sister United Nations initiative “Team Halo”) were hucksters who faked their own credentials. My overall impression from looking at everything was that this group operated in a very similar manner to many of the sleazy internet marketing operations I’ve seen in the past. Fortunately, the public appears to be seeing through what they did.
•Earlier this year we exposed them. Unfortunately, their abhorrent tactics continue and recently have been aimed towards Angela Wulbrecht RN because she advocated for a patient with a widely publicized vaccine injury.
Note: I posted an earlier version of this article six months ago. Due to recent events, I revised it and am re-releasing it.
Almost any viewpoint can be “proven” using the “correct” evidence and logic. Purely as a challenge, I’ve successfully done this in the past with beliefs I consider to be abhorrent and completely disagree with. Once you become familiar with the process, you begin to gain an appreciation for how ephemeral the truth is and how problematic it is that most people have filters they see through reality through that lead to them doing this even if it’s not deliberate (although if you watch carefully for it, you’ll often see non-verbal signs that show they are somewhat aware they are lying to themselves).
What’s in vaccines for babies? Jessica Rojas
September 25, 2024 – I really love when I get into debates with people, and they tell me I got my information from blogs. They find it so hard to believe that maybe I’m getting my information from the FDA, WHO, and CDC, along with several PhD professionals with doctorate degrees, immunology degrees, etc. Yet they can claim “conspiracy theorist” simply because that person doesn’t think along with the mainstream mentality. That doesn’t equate “conspiracy theorist.”
So this post is going to be about the CDC schedule, the vaccines your infant is injected with and the ingredients injected into them at each visit.
Birth:
Your infant receives the Vit K and Hep B injections.
Ingredients: 1mg Vit K
10 mg Polysorbate 80
10.4 mg Propylene Glycol (edible antifreeze)
.17 mg Sodium acetate anhydrous
.00002 mL glacial acetic acid (vinegar)
Hepatitis B surface antigen
250 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin)
5,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
2 month visit:
Your infant receives Hep B, DTaP (3 vaccines in 1), Hib, Polio, Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV7) (7 antigens in 1), Rotavirus
Ingredients: Hep B surface antigen
250 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin)
5,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
diphtheria toxoid
tetanus toxoid
3 pertussis antigens
haemophilus influenza type b antigen
Neisseria meningitides antigen
poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3
7 serotypes of Streptococcus penumoniae antigen
corynebacterium diphtheria e antigen
5,000 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
975 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin)
calf serum protein (aborted cow blood)
200 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
.005 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
.025 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
100 mcg Polysorbate 80 (Carcinogen)
9,000 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
.2 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
5 live reassortant rotaviruses
calf serum protein (aborted cow blood)
polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
sodium citrate (food additive)
sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive!)
sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
sucrose (cane sugar)
4 month visit:
Repeat
6 month visit:
Repeat
If you do flu shots starting at 6 months, add:
three viral influenza strains
125 mcg gelatin (ground-up animal carcasses)
You’re welcome to add all that up, but just in case you don’t want to bother, here are a few.
3,175 mcg of aluminum, which is a known neurotoxin.
15,000 mcg antifreeze
600 mcg formaldehyde
310 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen, and much more)
All of that within the first 6 months of life.
Your infant is not capable of producing antibodies on their own for the first 6 months of life. Immunoglobulin antibodies such as IgM, IgG are not fully mature until up to 2 years of age. IgA immunoglobulin antibodies are given to an infant with mother’s first milk and initiates the immune response and lasts up to 18 months of life.
You injected all of that into your child for nothing. And this is why I cannot and will not condone the vaccine program. It is archaic. If the vaccine program were not a multi billion dollar business, then it would have died out already, used only in extreme cases or travel.
And then you’ll go on to inject more of all that at the 12 month visit, but we’ll add human blood (not always compatible with your blood type), Monosodium L-glutamate which causes obesity and diabetes, and MRC-5 cells made from ABORTED HUMAN BABIES, which are worth more if they are extracted ALIVE, Potassium chloride (used in lethal injection), Potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent), baking soda, borax, sorbitol (which has literature specifying not to be injected), and Urea (metabolic waste from human urine),
And the other buffer and media ingredients that they don’t have to disclose such as the fact that there are still trace amounts of Thimerosal, so long as it is < or = 3mcg per dose, which is considered biologically safe by the FDA, not taking into consideration the multiple doses given within such a short time period or synergistic toxicities.
Biological select agents and toxins. KATHERINE WATT
SEP 24, 2024
Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law
Information for readers building mental maps of legalized crimes related to quarantine (42 CFR 70 and 42 CFR 71) and quarantinable communicable diseases (42 USC 264).
42 CFR 73 – Select agents and toxins affecting humans, is relevant because of the way that diagnostic testing, biological weapons, biological defense and vaccination programs are all components of a single biological warfare research, development, manufacturing and deployment system, with different programs hidden in different sections of the laws (statutes and regulations) and connected to each other through more or less obscured language, especially waivers, exemptions, preemptions, suspensions and exclusions from other laws that would — without the waivers and exemptions — enable criminal prosecution of the actors for their acts of toxin-mediated mutilation and homicide.
In other words, the laws legalize poisoning.
The select agents and toxins regulations codified at 42 CFR 73 are authorized by Congress under 42 USC 262, 42 USC 263 and several other statutes.
These programs are also known as BSAT programs, “biological select agents and toxins,” and are non-regulated/fake-regulated under HHS-CDC Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
Current definition of biological agent, as amended by Congress in June 2002:
Biological agent means any microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae, or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or deleterious alteration of the environment.
Current list of HHS-designated select agents and toxins, is at 42 CFR 73.3.
Congress has authorized corresponding statutes covering microorganisms and microorganism products (toxins) that harm plants and animals, codified at 7 USC 8401 and 8411 and regulated at 9 CFR 121, Possession, use, and transfer of [animal] select agents and toxins and 7 CFR 331, Possession, use and transfer of [plant] select agents and toxins.
Overlap select agents and toxins are biological agents (microorganisms) and microorganism components that are listed in both 9 CFR 121.4 (animal) and 42 CFR 73.4 (human).
Current list of overlap select agents and toxins is at 42 CFR 73.4.
Below are downloaded PDF versions of relevant Congressional acts, US Code sections (statutes) and Code of Federal Regulations sections (regulations).
They’re derived from the 1902 Virus-Toxin law (licensing manufacturers of poisons intended for use on humans) and 1913 Virus-Serum-Toxin Act (products for use on livestock) as developed through the 1944 Public Health Service Act, 2002 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act and related Congressional acts and agency rule-making.
Laws authorizing and governing research, development, production and use of harmful biological agents and toxins on human, animal and plant targets are also related to at least two biological weapons statutes: 18 USC 175-178, Biological weapons, a federal crime statute with exemptions for HHS/PHS, USDA and DoD programs, and 50 USC 1511-1528, Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.
Some references
Congressional acts:
MEASLES “OUTBREAK” IN MAINE WAS VACCINE-INDUCED ALL ALONG
September 24, 2024 ICAN – ICAN’s attorneys obtained documents related to the widely reported May 2023 “outbreak” of measles in Maine. As it turns out, test results from the CDC confirmed that the measles case was “consistent with vaccine strain,” meaning there was no “outbreak” and, instead, it was the vaccine that caused the child’s rash.
Lead Counsel, Aaron Siri, Esq. lays out the details here:
On May 5, 2023, the Maine CDC reported that a child had “tested positive” for measles. News outlets immediately began fearmongering, hinting that the “outbreak” was due to low vaccination rates:
- “Measles can be serious for anyone…” (Maine CDC Facebook Page)
- “In severe cases, measles can cause pneumonia, brain swelling and death.” (Bangor Daily News)
- “The CDC says roughly one to three of every 1,000 children infected with measles die.” (USA Today) Note: the death rate is actually more like 1 in 500,000.
- “Measles was declared eliminated from the US in 2000… But vaccination rates in the US have dropped in recent years, sparking new outbreaks.” (CNN)
- “Anyone who is not immunized or does not know their measles immunization status should get vaccinated.” (Maine CDC Press Release)
The Maine CDC reported that even though the child had received a dose of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, it was “considering the child to be infectious out of an abundance of caution.” In the meantime, the Maine CDC indicated it had sent a specimen to CDC headquarters to determine the specific strain of measles; however, it did not mention how the child would have been exposed to the wild strain of measles, such as international travel, nor did it share how recently the child may have received the vaccine.
According to a WHO report, about 2% of those who receive the measles vaccine develop a rash, called VARI (vaccine-associated rash illness). In fact, one study recommends assuming the rash is vaccine-caused and that “testing should only be considered if exposure to the wild-type (not vaccine-strain) virus is strongly suspected.”
So, it is unclear why the Maine CDC raised the alarm and then took so long to confirm the specific strain. The child was diagnosed on May 3, but it took the Maine CDC five days to ship the sample to the CDC. It then took the CDC seven days to report the results and for the Maine CDC to announce the child was not infectious.
ICAN, through its attorneys, requested relevant records and received them. Incredibly, they reveal that the positive measles test was “[c]onsistent with vaccine strain,” which is apparently an “acceptable” form of measles because, as the Maine CDC announced, the strain that the child tested positive for was not considered “an infectious strain of the virus,” despite causing traditional symptoms of the disease. Decidedly absent from Maine’s announcement was the fact that the child got measles as a result of the vaccine. Maine and the CDC simply hid this fact from the public.
Maine’s actions make sense, however, when considering that it may have just been following a CDC marketing presentation which states that the perfect “recipe” for creating demand for vaccines “requires creating concern, anxiety, and worry” by, for example, having medical experts and public health authorities “state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)” and show “[v]isible/tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness (e.g., pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward) and people getting vaccinated (the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce)” — all things we saw implemented during this “outbreak.”
ICAN will continue to follow-up on reported outbreaks across the country. In the meantime, catch up on some of ICAN’s additional work on vaccine policy:
- ICAN’S MONUMENTAL MISSISSIPPI WIN
- FDA CONTINUES TO AVOID ICAN’S PETITION TO SUSPEND THE IPOL POLIO VACCINE FOR CHILDREN
- FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DROPS COVID-19 VACCINE TRAVEL MANDATE ON SAME DAY IT WAS DUE TO RESPOND TO ICAN’S LEGAL CHALLENGE
- ICAN-FUNDED LAWSUIT PROHIBITING ANY LOCAL VACCINE MANDATES WINS FINAL BATTLE; SETS CALIFORNIA PRECEDENT
- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: ICAN-FUNDED SUIT AGAINST OSHA VACCINE MANDATE PREVAILS
To support future legal actions like these, click here to donate!
COVID-19 Vaccination Super Loads Body with Excessive Spike Protein PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Injecting mRNA after SARS-CoV-2 Infection Builds a Bigger Enemy Within Us
SEP 24, 2024 – Measurement of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is routine community standard of care in the assessment of long-COVID and vaccine injury syndromes. I have noticed that the most ill patients are those who had COVID-19 early and then took one or more ill-advised COVID-19 vaccines. Recall the US FDA did not allow Pfizer or Moderna to vaccinate COVID-19 recovered patients in the registration clinical trials because they had great expected harm and no opportunity for clinical benefit. Later, three studies demonstrated that indeed vaccination after infection was a bad idea with much greater risks of serious adverse events than SARS-CoV-2 naive patients.
Kayukawa et al demonstrated the expected finding. Antibodies go up with infection but because this is a natural process where the body fights SARS-CoV-2 on mucosal surfaces, the serological rise is low. However, vaccination after infection gives a huge rise in anti-spike antibodies implying the body is super-loaded with Spike. I wonder if anyone knew we would be seeing evidence of persistent Spike three years after the primary series.
Vaccine Horror Shocks the World: Exclusive Update on Alexis Lorenze’s Nightmare Injury – Media Blackout [VIDEO 1:09:46] THE VIGILANT FOX
Introducing the top ten stories they chose not to tell you this week.
SEP 22, 2024 – #10 – Vaccine Horror: 23-year-old suffers devastating injury after being given three vaccines at once.
Within ten minutes of her injections, Alexis Lorenze went temporarily blind, began vomiting, and then things went horribly downhill from there.
Before Nurse Angela intervened, UC Irvine staff mocked Alexis’s injuries, laughed at her, and subjected her to extreme delays when she requested help while suffering from unbearable pain.
After Alexis’s horrific vaccine injury went viral, she was transferred to the ICU, likely due to the mounting public pressure on the hospital. And the doctor who mandated these shots on Alexis has since disappeared from the picture.
Thankfully, Alexis is slowly getting better and has regained vision in both eyes, but still suffers from setbacks and a great deal of pain.
Alexis says as soon as she starts getting “a little bit of strength back,” she’s going to join forces with the vaccine-injured community to take down the criminal medical system that injured her.
Watch our exclusive interview with Alexis and her nurse advocate, Angela. Alexis needs your prayers, and she needs people to share her story so others don’t suffer the same fate.
You can support Alexis by contributing to her fundraiser here to help her get the proper medical care she desperately needs.
SUPPORT ALEXIS: givebutter.com/savealexis
What Is Next on the Pandemic Horizon? [VIDEO 7:23] PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough on Just the News
SEP 21, 2024 – Many have believed for some time that COVID-19 is not a public health concern. The U.S. national emergency ended May 11, 2023 as President Joe Biden signed a bipartisan congressional resolution to bring it to a close after three years — weeks before it was set to expire alongside a separate public health emergency. However, some of the Emergency Use Authorized COVID-19 vaccines continued their status with no public health emergency.
What did not end?
Two key provisions did not end:
1. A separate emergency declaration also issued by the HHS secretary under Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, which allows emergency use authorization (EUA) of certain drugs and biological products for COVID-19 including vaccines. It’s unclear when this EUA will end, but it did not end on May 11.
2. A declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act (part of the Public Health Service Act) also issued by the HHS secretary, which provides liability immunity for activities related to COVID-19 medical countermeasures. The secretary has set the end date for this declaration as Oct. 1, 2024—let’s see if that holds.
WATCH: NYC Covid Czar Who Held Secret Drug-Fueled Orgies During Pandemic Admits He “Forced” Vaccinations on the Public by Making Their Lives “Uncomfortable” By Cristina Laila
Sep. 19, 2024 8:00 pm – New York City’s Covid Czar Dr. Jay Varma was caught revealing shocking details about how he ignored the mandates he pushed on citizens, like no indoor dining, during NYC’s brutal COVID lockdowns.
Dr. Varma was the senior advisor for public health under then-NYC Mayor DeBlasio.
He admitted he held secret drug-fueled sex parties during the pandemic and New Yorkers would have been “pissed” if they found out because he was in charge of the city’s Covid response.
“I had to be kind of sneaky about it,” he told the female reporter. “I was running the entire COVID response for the city. We rented a hotel—we all took like, you know, Molly/Ecstacy. 8 to 10 of us were in a room. Like just being naked with friends…” he explained.
[Ed.:
ABLECHILD: Adderall ADHD Drug Causes Psychosis and Mania by JoeHoft.com and AbleChild
Sep. 19, 2024 9:00 pm – Over the last six months AbleChild has made a point of highlighting the failure of psychiatric diagnosing by repeating the mantra that is supported by available data showing that, despite boat loads of money being funneled into mental health, nobody is getting better.
But it gets worse. Not only are patients not getting better, but because of the “treatment” being prescribed, many are falling victim to excessive diagnosis and serious mental breakdown risks.
A recent study conducted by Lauren Moran, a researcher at Mass General Brigham, reveals just how destructive the drugs prescribed to “treat” ADHD can be.
First, let’s remember that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is NOT based on science. There is no medical test (blood work, urine test, CAT/MRI, etc.,) that will reveal any known objective, confirmable abnormality in the brain that is ADHD.
In fact, ADHD is a list of behaviors in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association. If a child is labeled with six of the eighteen behaviors, the ADHD label is affixed. Suddenly the five-year-old boy who wiggles too much in his school chair is abnormal and suffering from a mental illness that must be “treated” chemically.
Now, according to the research published in The American Journal of Psychiatry by Moran, patients “treated” with high doses of stimulants (ADHD drugs) were 60 percent more likely to suffer psychosis or mania than those NOT using the drugs.
There appear to be three issues with these findings. First, despite the fact that the diagnosis is completely subjective, not based in science, the behavioral health community has been so successful in labeling America’s children as abnormal and suffering from a mental illness that the label is just accepted without question and millions of American children have had their brains chemically altered to “treat” the alleged mental illness.
According to recent data, as of 2021, 41 million prescriptions for Adderall (amphetamine) were written for those suffering from ADHD. This number is the equivalent of one in eight Americans who “need” to have their brains chemically altered just to function “normally?”
Secondly, what is Adderall? The ADHD “treatment” Adderall is a stimulant, and it is listed by the federal government as a Schedule II drug which is the same classification as cocaine, heroin and meth and it is highly addictive.
In a Daily Mail article about Moran’s research, the reporter explained that “They (ADHD drugs) work by ramping up dopamine levels in the brain, which is linked to hallucinations, delusions and paranoia.”
Hmmm. Ya think? That’s interesting because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which approves these drugs for use, says “the mode of therapeutic action in ADHD is not known.”
Yep. Despite hundreds of millions of Americans taking these “treatments,” nobody at the FDA or the pharmaceutical company has a clue about how Adderall or any of the ADHD stimulant “treatments” work in the brain.
And this is in spite of the fact that the great and near great within the pharmaceutical industry and research community have had literally more than one hundred years to figure it out.
The fact is, little is known about the human brain and how it works, let alone how it works on prescription mind-altering drugs.
But that doesn’t stop the psychiatric community from labeling Americans with non-existent mental illnesses and the pharmaceutical industry from cashing in on “treatments” that nobody knows how the drugs “work” in the brain.
What is clear, is that the pharmaceutical drug, just like illegal drugs like speed, will change behavior. Whether that is a good thing is still being debated.
But it’s also important to consider the adverse side effects associated with Adderall.
Heart problems, hallucinations, aggression, hostility, paranoia, convulsions, fast heart rate, adverse growth effect, weight loss, mood changes, insomnia, psychotic episodes, and anxiety are some of the adverse events associated with the “treatment.”
So, the truth is there is no science to support an abnormality in the brain that is ADHD, no one has a clue about how the drugs “work” in the brain as “treatment” for the alleged ADHD and, finally, because of Moran’s research, is it now time to wonder how many Americans received additional mental illness diagnoses because of the adverse events associated with the ADHD drug “treatment?”
In other words, when a patient became paranoid or started hallucinating because of the ADHD drug “treatment” was the patient then diagnosed with another alleged mental illness and prescribed another prescription mind-altering drug?
Difficult to know. But this is the problem when behavior is labeled as an abnormality without any science to back it up.
Ironically, the ADHD “brain abnormality” is singularly an American mental illness. Yep. According to recent data, 11 percent of American kids under 17 years old are diagnosed with ADHD compared to just one percent of their European counterparts.
And America takes the lead in drugging its kids with ADHD drugs to a tune of an estimated $9.6 billion.
Finally, it cannot go unnoticed that like all alleged mental illnesses, the ADHD diagnosis is increasing, not decreasing. And with increased diagnosing comes increased drugging.
But no one in positions of power can understand why the suicide rate is increasing and is considered a crisis among America’s children. No one can understand why pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into suicide prevention measures hasn’t made a difference.
AbleChild must sound the alarm. Despite hundreds of billions of dollars dumped into the mental health industry, diagnosing and drugging is increasing and no one is getting better. Perhaps someday a smart lawmaker will ask why.
Anti-Spike Antibodies Among Vaccinated Predict Major Adverse Events after Myocardial Infarction PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Lab Test Indirectly Implicates Spike as Cause of Complications after Heart Attack
SEP 19, 2024
The medical community is learning one of the most valuable tests in the COVID-19 era is the total quantitative antibodies against the Spike protein. This test reflects exposure to the Spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 infection and also COVID-19 vaccination particularly with mRNA and adenoviral DNA vaccines.
Blasco et al reported on heart attacks occurring from March, 2020 to March, 2023. The unvaccinated must have come from 2020 before the advent of COVID-19 vaccines on the Spanish market. Antibodies were much higher in those who took one or more COVID-19 vaccines and they were associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as recurrent infarction and cardiac death. The time from vaccination to heart attack was 142 days on average. Of note, only the vaccinated with elevated anti-Spike levels were independently associated with this outcome.
The shortcomings of this paper are detailed information on when the subjects contracted COVID-19, how many times, and the combined exposure of vaccination after previous infection and COVID-19 illness upon vaccine failure. Nevertheless, the Spike antibody level appeared to be prognostic.
Hopefully the academic community will do more work with this important marker of infection and COVID-19 vaccine exposure and soon move to directly measuring Spike protein itself as a pathogenic factor proven to cause blood vessel damage, myopericarditis, and thrombosis.
John Frankman: Helping Trump Correct DoD Vaccine Mandate by John Frankman
Sep. 17, 2024 2:45 pm – At a campaign rally last month, Donald Trump made a significant promise: if elected President, he would restore service members kicked out of the military by the COVID vaccine mandate with backpay and an apology.[1] Though this move is a necessary and commendable first step, it is insufficient to fully address the damage President Biden and Vice President Harris did to our military and its service members by the vaccine mandate.
One obstacle to repairing this damage is the difficulty those outside the military have in understanding how the military was affected by this order. The military is a unique institution foreign to most Americans. It has its own hierarchical structure, legal system, and cultural norms and is an all-consuming way of life. All Americans were affected by COVID risk prevention policies, but service members were especially impacted.
Most believe the extent of the damage was the 8600 service members who were kicked out.[2] In reality, in addition to those discharged, the DoD forced out tens of thousands of others[3] and left many vaccine injured.[4]
Beyond these immediate effects on readiness, the mandate was illegal,[5] violated service members’ religious rights,[6] was implemented in extremely coercive ways that destroyed trust, habituated a leadership environment that rewards moral cowardice and careerism, and is likely a significant factor in the current recruitment crisis.
Solely bringing back those kicked out with backpay and an apology doesn’t come close to fixing the long-term institutional damage caused by the mandate.
To address the damage done by the military’s COVID vaccine mandate and to ensure a clearer understanding of the problem, Trump should take the following steps.
First, to gain full insight into the problems surrounding the mandate, Congress should hold a series of hearings on the implementation of the DoD’s COVID 19 policy with collaboration from veterans who experienced it. There is a network of hundreds of former and active service members dedicated to repairing the damage done by the mandate. These individuals can serve as witnesses, offer background information, and ultimately provide Trump and Congress a clear picture of the problems with recommended solutions.
Republicans, who currently hold a majority in the House, can call for these hearings without any Democrat help. If Trump called on House Armed Services Committee Republicans to hold this series of hearings now, he would understand the problem and be ready to fix it immediately upon taking office. I made this request to HASC on July 10th elaborating hearing topics and how veterans can help.[7]
Second, Trump must ensure that DoD leaders who carried out this unlawful order are held accountable. He can do this by using his service secretaries to court martial those responsible for laws they violated via the COVID mandate and risk mitigation policy, even recalling officers off retirement to active duty.
Crucial to this step is appointing competent service secretaries of good character. Some recommendations for Trump’s consideration for Secretary of Defense are Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Robert Greenway of the Heritage Foundation.
For individual service secretaries, Trump can consider LTC (Ret) Matthew Lohmeier, author of Irresistible Revolution for Secretary of the Air Force and CDR Rob Green, author of Defending the Constitution Behind Enemy Lines for Secretary of the Navy. These two are experts on the effects of DEI and COVID policy on the military and can redirect the military to its primary purpose of supporting and defending the constitution.
Without accountability this will happen again.
Finally, Trump must enact legislation to repair the damage done to service members.
Restoring the 8,600 service members discharged from the mandates is a small aspect of the larger damage done to the military. Many individuals, though not technically discharged, chose to leave because COVID policies caused them irreparable career damage or they risked losing their honorable discharge.
The unvaccinated who stayed in the military weren’t able to deploy, travel, or move to future duty stations while their exemptions were pending. They were also likely stigmatized for not being a “team player.”
There must be a board process to adjudicate missed career opportunities and promotions for all whose careers were impacted. If individuals who enforced the unlawful mandate for the sake of careerism are rewarded while those who followed the constitution are punished, the military remain morally degraded.
Other necessary legislation includes covering COVID vaccine injuries under the PACT Act, automatically upgrading discharge statuses for those kicked out to honorable, and making Constitutional training an annual requirement. Service members must know their individual rights and understand the document they took an oath to support and defend.
Trump’s promise to bring back service members discharged by the COVID vaccine mandate with backpay and an apology are praiseworthy, but not enough to fix the damage President Biden and Vice President Harris did through the mandate. Trump must utilize veterans in congressional hearings to gain awareness, use his service secretaries to court martial flag officers responsible for the mandate, and implement legislation that addresses the full scope of the damage done by the mandate. Though a large task, Trump is not alone, he can lean on veterans affected by the mandate for assistance.
[1] https://x.com/johny_franks/status/1811188851928432832
[1] https://x.com/LarryDJonesJr/status/1826345978682900643
[3] Total force reduced by 6000 from SEP 2021 to SEP 2022
Army misses FY22 recruitment by 15000
[6] Green, Rob. Defending the Constitution Behind Enemy Lines: A Story of Hope For Those Who Love Liberty. Skyhorse Publishing, 2023, (66-68). https://www.amazon.com/Defending-Constitution-behind-Enemy-Lines/dp/1510778071
[7] https://x.com/johny_franks/status/1811188851928432832
Dr. Ryan Cole: “I think the biggest problem we’re gonna be fighting for a long time is chronic autoimmune disease. These (COVID) injections were contaminated with DNA. They were made with a synthetic RNA and they weren’t just making spike proteins, they were making Frankenstein proteins as well. And when the immune system is exposed to proteins that it’s not supposed to see then it starts to go haywire. So certainly we’ve seen some excess sudden death and we’ve seen death from all causes increased around the world after the rollout of these genetic injections that were never a vaccine. They were experimental genetic injections and so a lot of autoimmune disease for a long time and decreased fertility rates we’re already seeing in many countries around the world and what I noted early on was we were seeing a lot of runaway turbo cancers and I think we’re going to continue to see that sadly.
These weren’t what they were advertised to be, they were never vaccine. And the lesson here is that we should never as a population ever use synthetic RNA genetic injections ever again.”
ACAM2000 Package Insert Warning: “Death of unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals.” SUPER SPREADER
Do you still refuse to believe that they are TRYING to kill you?
SEP 14, 2024
Really important information to be aware of.
“On August 30th, 2024 the FDA approved the new ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine for use against monkey pox.
The warning label of this vaccine says:
“Individuals who are vaccinated with this vaccine should quarantine for 4 weeks after injection. During this quarantine individuals cannot handle babies, be around pregnant women, cannot go swimming or be in hot tubs, cannot use public restrooms, share a bed, clothing, or be in close contact with an unvaccinated individual.“
It also says on the warning label that this ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine “may cause the spread of smallpox”. But the worst part. . .at the bottom of this vaccine insert, it states- “Death of unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals may occur”.
Strategies for Ridding the Body of Synthetic mRNA and Spike Protein PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough on Brannon Howse Live
SEP 14, 2024 – With the world in regret over taking one or more COVID-19 vaccines, the race is on to find ways of allowing the body to rid itself of the long-lasting and toxic mRNA-lipid nanoparticle complex and its deadly product the Wuhan Spike Protein.
Please enjoy this September 6, 2024 appearance I had on Brannon Howse Live, Worldview Tube Television to discuss recent paper on new technologies to deactivate mRNA and review the global standard for degrading the Spike protein, namely, McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
President, McCullough Foundation
Just a Reminder: Masks Are BAD For Your Health By Michael Bryant
September 6, 2024
“Within an established totalitarian regime the purpose of propaganda is not to persuade, much less to inform, but rather to humiliate. From this point of view, propaganda should not approximate the truth as closely as possible: on the contrary, it should do as much violence to it as possible. For by endlessly asserting what is patently untrue, by making such untruth ubiquitous and unavoidable, and finally by insisting that everyone publicly acquiesce in it, the regime displays its power and reduces individuals to nullities.” — Theodore Dalrymple
A recent study in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal, took an in-depth look at the toxic hazards posed by wearing face masks during the 2020–2023 covid pandemic. Under the public health measures imposed by most government jurisdictions during those four years, “people around the world were forced to wear masks for large proportions of the day based on mandates and laws.”
The study, titled “Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins — A scoping review,” specifically looked at “the potential of face masks for the content and release of inanimate toxins.”
The scoping review focused on 24 separate studies that evaluated the content and/or release of toxins in 631 masks (273 surgical masks, 228 textile masks, and 130 N95 masks).
Sixty-three percent of the studies showed alarming results. They found high microplastics and nanoplastics release. Dangerous exceedances were also evidenced for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), xylene, acrolein, per-/polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and phthalates as well as for lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), antimony (Sb), and titanium dioxide (TiO2).
A chart that graphically illustrates the “toxic substances and classes that may be responsible for limit value exceedances with resulting potential life-shortening effects” can be found here:
The study’s authors emphasized that their sole focus was on “the direct human health risks resulting from direct absorption of possible toxins from the mask.” They acknowledged certain additional hazards that were not within the scope of this study:
- The risks of the “animate ecosystem” (e.g., bacteria and fungi accumulation associated with mask-wearing);
- The toxicological risks of inhaled CO2 from the mask dead space;
- Toxins that were regarded separately, because their mixture and interaction can contribute to a higher toxicity than can each substance on its own;
- Further risks of chemical reactions in the mask breathing zone, which are turned into “chemical reactors” at the entrance of the airways.
Note that this evaluation took into account only inanimate toxins. This means the overall harms from mask-wearing are likely even greater than cited here.
This most recent study brought the contentious topic of “face masks as a public health measure” back into the spotlight and reaffirmed our native intelligence—namely, that putting industrial material over our mouth and our nose when we breathe is not a good idea.
The unequivocal results of this study are not favorable for any public health official, politician, administrator, or bureaucrat who imposed mask mandates on employees, school children, and the public at large. Indeed, the study’s authors leave no wiggle room when they write:
“Undoubtedly, mask mandates during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been generating an additional source of potentially harmful exposition to toxins with health threatening and carcinogenic properties at population level with almost zero distance to the airways (predominantly oral inhalation route) and to the gastrointestinal tract.” [Emphasis added.]
“Moreover, from a toxicological point of view, concerning their potential risks of use, face mask obligations enforced by law 2020–2023 have been introduced without preceding comprehensive risk analyses and without regulatory provisions (as is common for various products). On top of that, there was and still is no empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the masks in limiting the spread of viruses in the general populace.” [Emphasis added.]
There are a number of other reasons besides health to be opposed to mandatory mask-wearing. Wearing face coverings has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects.
Historically, masks have been used to objectify human beings and have been used as symbols of ritual humiliation and submission.
Recently, for example, we witnessed how masks were used as tools of emotional blackmail when children were taught that wearing a mask displays evidence of their “social responsibility.” In fact, what they were really being taught was to obey unscientific appeals to authority.
The masking debate has never been about facts, data, science, or human kindness. Rather, mask mandates are meant to create a climate of fear and to induce people to voluntarily submit to coercion and to perceived power. Mandatory masks are nothing more than psychological training wheels for coercive measures — that is, politically motivated propaganda.
Covering a face, hiding a smile, and smothering laughter are denials of life.
Breath is life. A smile is life. Laughter is life.
Choose life.
When you murder your most loyal customers, they stop coming back… SASHA LATYPOVA
Moderna cuts R&D budget by $1.1B, Charles River lays off 3% staff.
SEP 13, 2024 – According to Endpoint News, Moderna is in financial trouble. They are not even “break-even”, i.e. not generating positive cash flow from operations! This is after Trump’s Operation Warp Speed showered $10B+ on them in a span of about 18 months. Where did all this money go? Swiss vaults? Secret underground bases in Antarctica where Bancel is planning to hide out for the duration of Armageddon? I don’t know, I am not well versed in these conspiracies.
To kick off its annual R&D day in New York, Moderna said Thursday that it will slash its annual spending on research and development by $1.1 billion by 2027. The biotech will also stop developing five early-stage programs, place other drugs on the backburner and focus on a handful of late-stage mRNA medicines.
Simultaneously, Moderna overhauled its long-term financial projections, and it now forecasts the company’s break-even point in 2028 instead of 2026. The shake-up will not include major layoffs, Bancel told Endpoints News, and he envisions the company staying around its 6,000-employee headcount for the next three to five years.
But, you see, according to Bancel, this is because “it’s working!”, just like your beautiful mRNA shot is working as promised…
“It’s a moment of evolution, in the sense the platform is working, which is the most important thing,” Bancel said. “We just want to be responsible and financially disciplined.”
Moderna’s stock price $MRNA has fallen over 80% over the past three years, erasing about $150 billion in market value from its all-time, pandemic highs.
The Wall Street is not impressed:
“R&D reductions are too far out chronologically to be credible from a management team that we think has proven serially unable to project the performance of their business,” Leerink Partners analyst Mani Foroohar wrote in a Thursday morning note to investors. Foroohar holds an underperform rating on Moderna’s stock.
Jefferies analyst Michael Yee also said he expects the investor debate to continue over whether Moderna can reach profitability without raising additional money, noting that the R&D cuts are occurring “further out in time.”
Break-even forecast delayed two years.
The cuts will slash Moderna’s R&D spending by about 20% from 2025 to 2028, from a total of $20 billion to $16 billion.
The focus will be 10 product launches by the end of 2027, including vaccines for Covid, flu, RSV, norovirus, and cytomegalovirus, or CMV. I have personally reviewed the CMV vaccine data in animals when I reviewed Moderna’s animal testing data for mRNA covid shots. That’s because they simply put in CMV studies from 2017 into the covid shot package in 2020 and said it’s all the same! To some extend that’s true – it’s all the same poison, from the same source – DARPA/DTRA/CDC. The data from 2017 showed that the CMV vax distributes all over the body, accumulates in major organs where it causes death and injury. It is just as poisonous as anything else Moderna makes. This company is mostly a storefront for the US government/DOD pushing injectable poison under false pretenses of “public health”. Moderna doesn’t “develop” any new medicines, as they had fired anyone competent in drug development long before 2020. Their manufacturing is “fully digital” so that people on the floor can’t ask any questions.
The RSV vaccine is a flop, as people are becoming less stupid. That’s good news.
So far, Moderna has struggled to gain commercial traction with its RSV vaccine, called mResvia, in an intensely and newly competitive market with rival shots sold by GSK and Pfizer.
Other prioritized programs include two rare-disease therapies and a Merck-partnered cancer vaccine program.
Moderna is also stopping five early-stage programs (thank goodness):
mRNA-1287, an endemic human coronaviruses vaccine
mRNA-1345, its RSV vaccine in the infant population
mRNA-5671, a KRAS-targeting cancer vaccine
mRNA-2752, a cancer drug
mRNA-0184, a heart failure therapy
In addition, Charles River Laboratories is cutting around 3% of its total workforce in “response to current trends”. Charles River is the main provider of animal studies for the global pharma industry. Since they are the early stage R&D provider, this indicates overall shrinkage of the pharma industry pipelines.
The Wilmington, MA-based company is laying off staff as well as “streamlining” its cost structure to “optimize its footprint, be more effective in supporting clients, and drive greater operating efficiencies, ” the spokesperson added.
As of Dec. 31 2023, the company had around 21,800 employees globally, and a 3% cut could mean that around 650 staffers would be laid off.
The company noted that pharma clients are overall pulling back on their R&D spending, which has a negative impact on CDMOs and manufacturers. Many pharma companies are shrinking their pipelines to cut costs, a trend Charles River CEO James Foster predicts will continue into next year.
Couldn’t have happened to a better bunch of people…
“Dr. Robert Chandler Exposes Batch-Based Injuries” [1:04:29] DR NAOMI WOLF
SEP 13, 2024 – A lead physician of the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Team, Dr. Robert Chandler, explains a new peer-reviewed study of 5 million Scandinavians, that shows three different outcomes, generally, based upon batch received. Is the mRNA rollout a massive ongoing experiment? Did Pfizer knowingly create three different formulas? Also: to find out what may have happened to you.
[Ed.: How Bad is My Batch?]
The Truth: About COVID-19 Shots [VIDEO 22:45] 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
Uncover the shocking truth behind COVID-19 vaccines: contamination, hidden risks, and regulatory failures. Millions were exposed without informed consent—this fight is for accountability & justice.
SEP 12, 2024 – This video delves into the alleged concealment of critical information regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA injections, focusing on how regulatory bodies and authorities misled the Australian public. It claims that significant contamination of genetic material was found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, far exceeding safety thresholds, with potential links to severe health risks like cancer and autoimmune diseases. Despite independent verification from multiple labs, global regulators, including Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), dismissed concerns, claiming there was no safety risk without conducting proper tests.
The video argues that the mRNA injections are in fact gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines, citing how these injections modify genetic material within cells to stimulate an immune response. It criticizes the lack of rigorous testing on the long-term effects of this genetic modification, accusing manufacturers and health authorities of withholding important information about the risks, such as the bio-distribution of modified RNA throughout the body and its potential to disrupt cellular functions.
Legal challenges against Pfizer and Moderna are outlined, notably the case of Dr. Julian Fidge, who accused the companies of bypassing Australia’s regulatory requirements for gene therapies. The lawsuit was dismissed due to a lack of legal standing, but the video highlights potential conflicts of interest, including Judge Helen Rofe’s undisclosed connections to Pfizer. This raises questions about the integrity of the judicial process, especially regarding the dismissal of critical evidence related to genetic contamination.
The video also condemns the narrative pushed by health authorities that the vaccines were “safe and effective,” arguing that data showed minimal absolute risk reduction and high infection rates among vaccinated individuals. It accuses authorities of fearmongering, particularly regarding children, and asserts that pregnant and breastfeeding women were given false assurances about the safety of the vaccines, despite being excluded from clinical trials.
Ultimately, the video calls for accountability and justice, emphasizing that millions of Australians were subjected to experimental gene-based treatments without adequate informed consent. It demands transparency, thorough investigations into regulatory failures, and reparations for those harmed. The script ends with a strong appeal to hold responsible parties accountable and to ensure that such breaches of public trust are never repeated.
They want you dead.
Do NOT comply.
[Ed.:
How vaccines cause autism STEVE KIRSCH
The science is clear. The aluminum in vaccines gets escorted into your brain. That’s the crux of it. The MMR shots don’t have aluminum, but MMR ends up being a great escort service.
SEP 12, 2024 – I was excited recently when I read a recent Substack post by my friend JB Handley entitled, “International scientists have found autism’s cause. What will Americans do?”
I immediately thought, “Vindication! We can now get the truth out with this new discovery.” I read the article looking for the new discovery only to find that the latest big discovery was published in 2018.
So I called JB and asked him if I missed anything. “Nope,” he said. He said that he published the article during COVID and didn’t get any traction on it and decided just now to republish it. So that’s the backstory on this article.
The main cause of autism
In a nutshell, it’s the accumulation of aluminum in the brain. This can happen with vaccines containing aluminum (or presumably other metals), but it can also happen from other vaccines like the MMR and COVID vaccines (which don’t contain aluminum) which can escort aluminum deposited into your body from other vaccines into the right places to trigger autism.
Vaccine experts argue aluminum is perfectly safe because it is assumed to be safe. But there is no science to support this.
[Ed.: This warning includes cooking with aluminum pots and pans, and aluminum foil!]
Recovering from Myopericarditis on McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification [57:26] PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough with Jason Lavigne and Vaccine Injured Paramedic Chet Chisholm
SEP 12, 2024 – Please enjoy this full length program hosted by Jason Levine with vaccine injured paramedic Chet Chisholm who is slowly but steadily recovering from COVID-19 vaccine myopericarditis. Lavigne is doing more than just podcasting. He is running as an independent for federal parliament to represent Yellowhead, Alberta. We discuss corruption, malfeasance, Chisholm’s pursuit of justice, and most importantly Chet’s road to recovery aided by McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification.
We review our recent critical paper on risk stratification for risk of cardiac death after vaccination which is largely an assessment for subclinical myopericarditis. The major, foundational action step for the vaccinated is McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification. I mention that the starting doses listed below, if well tolerated after a few weeks, are commonly doubled and quadrupled, always to be taken on an empty stomach.
[Ed.: Dr. McCullough and others strongly recommends nattokwinase as a part of the spike removal tools. I would like to strongly recommend the addition of lumbrokinase to the protocol. Lumbrokinase is similar to nattokwinase, but 30X stronger!]
COVID vax: Some batches increase your all-cause mortality by 9X or more. STEVE KIRSCH
But hey, nobody who works in public health actually cares how many people are killed by the lack of quality control on these vaccines. They are “safe and effective” even when they aren’t.
SEP 11, 2024
Executive summary
Batch analysis of the Czech Republic data comparing 1-year post-shot all-cause mortality rates shows some batches are 3X deadlier than other batches from the same manufacturer when given at the same time to the same age 5-year age group.
And a Moderna batch can be 8X or more deadlier than a Pfizer batch given at the same time to the same age group.
This cannot happen if the vaccines are safe.
Replicating the analysis
You can generate the csv file with the batch analysis (vax_4.csv) by cloning the Github repo, going to the code directory and typing “make vax.”
If you just want to work with the data without regenerating it from the source, you can download the vax_4.xlsx file here.
Feel free to analyze the data and publish your own analysis.
Over a 9X increase in all-cause mortality across brands
Whenever you do batch analysis, the fairest way is to compare the one year mortality rate between batches given in the same month to the same 5 year age range. This minimizes confounders.
For example, let’s look at all the Pfizer and Moderna batches given to more than 100 people in February 2021 aged 70-74 and compute the 1 year mortality from the time of the shot.
Do you see how there is a huge variation within the same brand, and an even larger variation across brands? For a safe vaccine, the1 year mortality rates should be very similar to each other. They are not. The Pfizer brands were within 2X of each other, but Moderna had over a 9X higher all-cause mortality.
Moderna PR will tell you, “Nothing inspires safety like knowing you are getting a 9X higher all-cause mortality by choosing Moderna!” They should do this… people will eat it up.
Of course, health officials refuse to look at the data and the public is never told of the quality control problem.
More than 3X all-cause mortality variation between Pfizer batches
You can’t have a 3X higher all-cause mortality that depends on which batch you get. That’s insane. Here are two batches given in the same month to the same 5 year age range. You can repeat this for other younger 5 year age ranges and you get the same factor of 3 so this is not a fluke.
[Ed.: How Bad is My Batch?]
What Happened to Trump’s 63 Million Doses of Hydroxychloroquine? ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS
By Dr. David Gortler, introduction and context by Dr. Robert Malone
SEP 10, 2024
“The modern nation-state, in whatever guise, is a dangerous and unmanageable institution, presenting itself on the one hand as a bureaucratic supplier of goods and services, which is always about to, but never actually does, give its clients value for money — and on the other as a repository of sacred values, which from time to time invites one to lay down one’s life on its behalf. . . . it is like being asked to die for the telephone company.” –Alasdair MacIntyre
“The general public is being reduced to a state where people not only are unable to find out about the truth, but also become unable to search for the truth because they are satisfied with deception and trickery that have determined their convictions, satisfied with a fictitious reality created by design through the abuse of language.” — Alasdair MacIntyre
In the context of COVID, although most associate me with speaking out in opposition to the gene therapy technology-based Spike vaccines (adenovirus and mRNA-based), at the beginning of the COVID crisis through into 2022 I was mainly focused on identifying, repurposing, and clinically testing existing drugs, and getting repurposed drugs and drug combinations for both hospital and outpatient use. Particularly notable was the role of my team and me in identifying and advocating for the use of the combination of Famotidine and Celecoxib +/- Ivermectin.
However, I was also very familiar with the data supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine. I vividly remember Dr. Peter Navarro calling one of my clients early in 2020 and trying to source additional doses. Dr. Zev Zelenko, whose early treatment protocol was based on use of Hydroxychloroquine, often sought my advice and once told me he considered me a mentor. I have personally met and spoken with esteemed French Professor Dr. Didier Raoult, who experienced one of the initial targeted COVID PsyWar attacks, for his work developing a treatment protocol combining hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. And I remember having to rapidly re-write a Famotidine clinical trial protocol to adapt to the declaration of hospital-restricted emergency use authorization for use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID.
What happened with the Trump/Navarro initiative involving stockpiling and deployment of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID is one of the most clear-cut and shocking case histories of globalized Deep/Administrative State and academic corruption combined with PsyWar deployment that I have ever encountered, and I had a front row seat for all of it. I know Rick Bright personally. I consider Peter Navarro a friend. I had a close, personal relationship with Dr. Zev Zelenko. I have never covered any of this in any podcast beyond the infamous Joe Rogan #1757 and this substack essay where I respond to an attack article regarding that podcast published by the Daily Mail.
In the following essay, Dr. Gortler provides a huge public service and homage to truth by exposing the fraud and malfeasance surrounding the demonization of the drug hydroxychloroquine during the COVIDcrisis.
This example of deployed PsyWar laid out by Dr. Gortler is incredible, as it shows the power of the administrative and deep state to coerce and bamboozle both a sitting president and his administration, as well as the American public, public health, and world governments.
How did this happen? In the Joe Rogan episode, I lay blame directly on Dr. Rick Bright (director of BARDA at the time), and Dr. Janet Woodcock (ex-acting director of the FDA). I stand by that. The real question is why and who or what corporation(s) were behind this?
When Rick was pushed out of his position as Director of BARDA (by Drs. Michael Callahan and Bob Kadlec), he landed an excellent, cushy job at the Rockefeller Institute. Who or what corporation drove the globally-coordinated smear campaign that attacked Trump, Navarro, Raoult, and anyone who advocated for early administration of hydroxychloroquine (+/- azithromycin or any other agent)?
I do remember asking (in 2020) CIA agent Dr. Michael Callahan about Raoult’s findings regarding hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and hearing him dismiss and smear both Raoult and the treatment without actually citing any data. Just bias. So I conclude from that experience that the CIA had some role in all of this sorry tale. The odd idea within the annotated DC insider elite seemed to be that only a specific anti-viral targeting SARS-CoV-2 could be clinically useful against the virus, rather than treating the symptoms of the disease.
Senator Johnson asks the FDA, CDC for data that will show the COVID vaccines are not safe STEVE KIRSCH
Whoa. You are gonna LOVE this.
SEP 06, 2024
Executive summary
Senator Johnson is determined to expose the truth about the COVID vaccine. Because of that, he’s my favorite member of Congress, bar none.
He just sent an extraordinary letter to the CDC and FDA asking them for numbers that will reveal just how deadly these shots are.
You will love the letter he sent.
I can’t wait to hear their response.
Johnson’s letter
It’s all covered in this article which I urge you to read. Note: You can only see his letter if you are using a desktop browser.
Summary
The CDC and FDA always avoid commenting on other people’s data and analysis. That’s why Johnson asked them what the comparable US numbers are.
I can’t wait to see the reply.
If they are being honest, it should be “we don’t have a clue because we don’t collect the data here in the US.”
And that should be concerning to anyone with a working brain. We’ll be able to leverage anything they say.
If you like my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Thanks!
Flu Vaccines: All Risk and NO Benefit BRUCHA WEISBERGER
Be smart and conduct a full investigation before an injection.
BS”D
SEP 05, 2024 – For many people, visiting their local pharmacy every fall for their annual flu shot is a ritual, one which they don’t stop to question.
But getting a flu shot should not be an “article of faith.”
Vaccination isn’t a commandment, is it?
There are major questions we should be asking:
•Is the flu vaccine effective at its stated goals of reducing hospitalization and death?
•Are there significant risks to getting the the flu vaccine?
•Do the benefits outweigh the risks?
In other words – do the shots work so well, and involve such minimal risk, that they create a net reduction in suffering and mortality? This is critical to know, as we certainly would not want to be increasing risk of serious illness or death.
Unfortunately, many people are getting flu vaccines automatically, not even thinking to question whether they actually work or not, nor whether they may cause very serious adverse effects.
🛑Does the flu shot prevent hospitalization and death?
Large bodies of evidence turn the common assumption on its head. Here are some key pieces:
•Robin Whittle, author of the nutritionmatters substack, highlights a fascinating 2020 study that was conducted on the data of over 7 million people in England and Wales spanning more than a decade, showing no benefit at all from flu shots – neither in hospital admission rates nor in death reduction – and if anything, negative efficacy (being vaccinated made things worse.) In fact, the findings were precise enough to discredit many previous studies.
Anderson et al. 2020 show that influenza vaccination of 60 to 70 year olds in England and Wales has no discernible positive impact on hospitalisation or deaths
Anderson et al. devised a powerful analysis based on an particular circumstance: In England and Wales, government policies lead to a very sharp rise in the proportion of people who are receive influenza vaccines once they turn 65.
[Ed.: Whoops:
EXCLUSIVE: Whistleblower and Combat Veteran ‘Unmasks the VA’s Unethical Experimentation’
Practice Management Tips for Spike Protein Illnesses PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough with Dr. Erica Williams
SEP 04, 2024 – Virtually every American has been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein either through COVID-19 infection or vaccination and because the vaccines are ineffective, for many they have had both exposures. As result the Spike protein and possibly the antibodies raised against it are producing a burden of disease never before seen in the clinic. This has been referred to by Parry et al as “spikeopathy.”
Academic medical centers have no grand rounds on the Spike protein. No management seminars. Big primary care CME operators such as PRIMED have ignored COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes. Thus doctors are drawing a blank when confronted with an obvious Spike protein blood clot or neurological problem.
I reached out to Dr. Erica Williams in Louisville, Kentucky to give us some insights into the Spike protein and the types of diseases she is now seeing in family practice. You will be amazed with her observations. Patients can help drive improvements in care by demanding antibody measurement to the Spike protein, risk stratification, and management specific to this abnormal protein as the cause of new illnesses.
COVID vaccinated kids are dying regularly from cardiac arrest STEVE KIRSCH
It’s baffling that they try to normalize this as always happening. It was never a thing before the COVID vaccines rolled out.
SEP 04, 2024
Executive summary
VSRF’s Nurse Angela knows of 15 kids, under 20, who died from cardiac arrest. They were all vaccinated with the COVID vaccine.
I did a CDC Wonder search for ICD-10 code I46 which is cardiac arrest.
It shows that those under age 23 don’t die from cardiac arrest:
Today, it is the new normal if you’ve had the COVID shots.
If the COVID shots are so safe, then why have over 80% of NHS employees refused to take another booster? STEVE KIRSCH
Former UK MP Andrew Bridgen just told me that over 80% of the NHS employees won’t take any more shots. I asked several AI models what this means.
SEP 03, 2024
Executive summary
The AI models all seem to agree that this is very troubling. It indicates that the COVID vaccines are not safe and effective, i.e., they lied to you.
Wow. Who would have guessed?
Read what the AI systems had to say.
ChatGPT
It’s a thought-provoking question, and it certainly raises valid concerns that need to be explored. The statistic you mention regarding NHS employees potentially refusing further COVID-19 boosters is indeed striking and could suggest a significant level of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals, who are often at the frontline of these public health measures.
The mainstream narrative typically promotes COVID-19 vaccines as being safe and effective, and for these vaccines, the regulatory bodies have given them emergency use authorization or full approval after assessing the risk-benefit ratio. However, the fact that a large percentage of health professionals may be opting out of additional boosters could indicate that their firsthand experience and observations might not align with the broader public messaging.
There could be several factors contributing to this phenomenon, and it’s important to consider them from multiple angles:
Adverse Effects and Observations: NHS employees, like other healthcare workers globally, have had unique insight into the immediate and short-term effects of the vaccines. They may be more acutely aware of any potential adverse effects, even those that are understated or underreported in official channels. This could contribute to a declining enthusiasm for further doses.
Questioning the Need for Boosters: As new variants of COVID-19 have emerged, the effectiveness of the original formulations of the vaccines against these variants has been called into question. If healthcare professionals perceive that the boosters are not providing significant additional protection, especially if they have already had previous doses, they might choose to forgo further shots.
Natural Immunity: Many healthcare workers have likely been exposed to the virus multiple times or have contracted COVID-19, potentially leading to natural immunity. There is ongoing debate in the scientific community about the durability and strength of natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity. Some may feel that their natural immunity is sufficient and thus may not see the need for additional vaccination.
Mistrust in Public Health Messaging: Throughout the pandemic, there has been a wide range of information and sometimes contradictory guidance from public health bodies. This inconsistency can erode trust, particularly among those who are supposed to be the most informed—healthcare workers. When trust diminishes, so does compliance with recommendations, even among medical professionals.
Vaccine Fatigue and Side Effects: The experience of side effects from previous shots, even if mild, can deter individuals from taking additional doses. The phenomenon of vaccine fatigue, especially in the context of a pandemic that has dragged on for years, could also play a role.
David Bell expands on the confirmed Moneypox numbers and the false emergency MERYL NASS
BTW, It is only an STD if lesions are confined to the genital area.
SEP 01, 2024
https://brownstone.org/articles/mpox-numbers-and-reality/
So, here we are in 2024, on the tail of a massively profit-driving (and impoverishing) outbreak called Covid-19 that enabled the largest transfer of wealth from the many to the few in human history. The WHO’s announcement that 5,000 (or less) suspected Mpox cases is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) allows it to fast-track vaccines through its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) program, bypassing the normal rigor required to approve such pharmaceuticals, and is suggesting Pharma start lining up.
Did you catch that? By calling moneypox a PHEIC, vaccines that are not licensed in the country where they are to be used can be fast-tracked for use there, and presumably a liability waiver (as included in early version s of the IHR that were not passed) with be attached to their use.
Who wins when this foolish declaration is made?
- WHO
- The 3 manufacturers of moneypox vaccines (Bavarian Nordic, Emergent Biosolutions, and I do not know who will supply the unlicensed Japanese-developed vaccine). Bavarian Nordic and Emergent Biosolutions are both built on the back of biosecurity fear-porn, have no civilian business, and pump out dangerous products of no established value.
- the Biosecurity establishment
[Ed.: Guess we really need to stop fucking monkeys! Just give it up!]
There are only 4 ways to extract the truth from doctors about the harms caused by the COVID vaccines STEVE KIRSCH
After 3 years of doing this, I’ve compiled a list of 4 methods to extract the truth about the safety and efficacy of the COVID shots.
SEP 01, 2024
Executive summary
Doctors have compelling stories. But fear and intimidation tactics keep them from speaking out.
There are 4 ways to extract the truth:
- Under oath in Congress
- Under oath in a court of law
- Press interview where the media relations department has consented to the interview
- Find retired doctors who don’t mind losing all their friends [Emphasis added]
The first two methods are the most likely to elicit the truth, but it’s not a guarantee. Compliance can be as low as single digits.
The third method is the least effective, but can occasionally work as well. Making this more complicated of course is that the mainstream media just isn’t going to ask any questions.
I’m certain that within the next 12 months, we’ll see the truth start to come out since there are court cases which will reach the deposition stage at that point and I know doctors who have said that they will only tell the truth if forced to testify under oath. Otherwise, they will remain silent.
The four methods
There are are only two ways to extract the truth from doctors:
- Ask them to testify under oath in Congress
- Get them under oath in a deposition in a court case
Both cases are protected speech and cannot legally be used to remove their credentials or fire them.
However, these methods are not a guarantee. Even with those protections in place there are many people who will still lie because they are more afraid of the medical boards ending their careers than of being put in jail for perjury.
The third way which can also be used to extract the truth from a limited number of doctors is for the press to request an interview through the media relations department of the organization employing the doctor. The doctor still runs the risk of losing their medical license and board certifications by speaking the truth about what they observed.
The final way to find a retired doctor who doesn’t mind losing all his friends.
About my earlier military doctor post
I had to remove my post about observations from the military doctor I talked to because he was worried he would be put in prison for the rest of his life for talking to me without authorization.
[Ed.:
RFK Jr. Calls for ‘Reckoning’ for ‘Immoral, Homicidal, Criminal Behavior’ During COVID-19 Pandemic [3:56] By Jim Hᴏft
Sep. 1, 2024 1:40 pm – At the Limitless Expo, a gathering focused on financial freedom and strategic empowerment, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a powerful speech that reignited the debate over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kennedy didn’t mince words as he called for a reckoning for those responsible for what he described as “homicidal criminal behavior” during the pandemic.
Kennedy, who authored a controversial book about Anthony Fauci, used his platform at the expo to reiterate his claims against the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director.
“I wrote a book about Fauci. It’s a great book. There are 2,200 footnotes in the book… I invited people to find problems with the book… And nobody ever told us any factual error in that book,” Kennedy said.
He went on to accuse Fauci and other officials of using their positions to enforce “totalitarian controls that were not science-based,” arguing that their actions led to unnecessary deaths worldwide.
“It’s a story, really, of people involved in really terrible, immoral, homicidal criminal behavior,” he said.
One of the most explosive claims Kennedy made was about the suppression of COVID-19 treatments like Ivermectin.
He said that the FDA’s discouragement of such treatments was not based on science but on a desire to push the vaccine agenda.
“By depriving people of Ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe, died, and they didn’t need to,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy also touched on the rise in myocarditis cases among young people, particularly athletes, since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.
He cited alarming statistics, stating, “On average, it was, I think, 29 a month globally, athletes who died on the field. We’re getting down to hundreds a month now.”
In his conclusion, Kennedy warned that while the mainstream media has yet to fully acknowledge these issues, “the science is out there now, and it’s devastating.”
He called for accountability, stating, “There still has to be a reckoning.”
[Ed:
Most Variation in All-Cause Mortality Explained by Mass COVID-19 Vaccination PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
Australian Ecological Analysis Points to Vaccine Campaign Causing Rising Death Counts
SEP 01, 2024 – After a pandemic, all cause mortality should go down due to a culling effect of the frail and vulnerable. We saw acute COVID-19 become the proximate cause of death in many seniors who were in the final year of natural life.
Now an analysis from Allen indicates that all-cause mortality is up in heavily vaccinated Australia and that at least two thirds in the variation per region is explained by mass COVID-19 vaccination. There are numerous well-documented fatal vaccine serious adverse events which are piling up months and years after the shots. Cumulative toxicity is another factor as a single person is not vaccinated just with the primary series (first two injections), but continued dosing every six months.
These data call for a direct data merge of the vaccine administration and death data in Australia to explore these very uncomfortable relationships. Because the Australian government pushed the vaccines so hard, officials have been stonewalling the public on this important next analysis.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
President, McCullough Foundation
LIFESAVING LABOR DAY SALE: Summer COVID Surge Shows We May Have to Return to 2020 SCAMDEMIC Measures 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
Lockdowns and boosters incoming…
AUG 31, 2024 – The powers that be are becoming increasingly desperate as we rapidly careen toward the presidential election. The current slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” uptake is approaching zero, and BigPharma’s stocks are cratering. The untenable debt supercycle and global financial markets are more super-fragile than ever. The doomsday clock has never been closer to midnight than right now.
Meanwhile, the genetically modified humans are suffering from VAIDS, and a scamdemic coverup for all of the surging “vaccine” adverse events is long overdue. With decimated immune systems and severe chronic inflammation due to the cytotoxic spike proteins (SP2) that the “vaccinated” and their reprogrammed DNA are endogenously producing non-stop, even the common cold is now a potentially life threatening condition.
According to an article from the Mockingbird MSM outlet The Hill entitled, Summer COVID surge shows we may have to return to 2020 pandemic measures, the VAIDS epidemic is gaining full steam heading straight into the upcoming flu season; to wit:
As summer 2024 draws to a close, the U.S. finds itself once again grappling with a surge in COVID-19 infections.
With the majority of Americans “vaccinated,” we now have further proof that the “Safe and Effective” Modified mRNA poisons are anything but; in other words, we are only just getting started:
This wave has taken many people by surprise, particularly as the country has largely consigned the pandemic to the past. While public life has pretty much returned to pre-pandemic norms — something almost none of us would have believed in the summer of 2020 — the virus itself has not.
No vaccine injected into the shoulder could ever offer even a scintilla of protection for a respiratory disease, nor would it stop transmission, nor would it attenuate symptoms in the slightest; in fact, it is scientifically impossible to vaccinate against a flu season, or a gain of function “pandemic” at that. It is also impossible to vaccinate against a constantly mutating virus, since by the time the doses are distributed that viral strain is long gone.
Mutations of the virus continue to occur, and new variants are emerging, posing ongoing challenges to public health and safety. As we look ahead to the remainder of 2024 and into early 2025, we need to take stock of where we are, understand the factors driving this resurgence and better anticipate how the pandemic might evolve.
The viral variant argument is just more of the same VAIDS coverup, and an absurdly false narrative that they are attempting to deploy in order to evolve their scamdemic followup.
