Daily Shmutz |COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery | 11/5/2023

COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.:  FEAR YOUR DOCTOR!  Medicine is a disgraced profession.  They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia.  Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]

Shedding Part 4 – Evidence of Placental and Breast Milk Transmission of Covid mRNA Vaccine Components   PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA

NOV 1, 2023 -The first three posts (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) in this series provided evidence of the following:

1. The FDA and the EMA define the mRNA vaccines as gene therapies.
2. The FDA requires that gene therapy products undergo human shedding studies given the known risks of shedding
3. One nanoparticle gene therapy (Luxterna), already on the market, warns that the product can be excreted in tears and nasal discharge
4. All three vaccine components (mrNA, the lipid nanoparticle, and the spike protein) distribute widely in the human body (contrary to promises of remaining localized in the arm) and for prolonged periods.
5. Numerous studies have demonstrated that synthetic LNP’s containing genetic material or drugs can be absorbed by various routes including intranasal, transcutaneous, transfollicular, transdermal and inhalation via the lungs.
6. LNPs retain their biologic activity after being absorbed no matter what route is used.

Now we will move towards assembling evidence of transmission of Covid mRNA vaccine components which then cause illness in others.

The title of this review paper is concerning: “Toxicity of Nanoparticles on the Reproductive System in Animal Models: A Review.” This paragraph raises serious questions:

BREAKING: Israeli MoH data released in March 2023 proves the vaccines are killing people. How come nobody noticed?? Hello!?!?   STEVE KIRSCH

In March 2023, MIT Professor Retsef Levi disclosed a troubling figure produced by the Israeli Ministry of Health. This is unassailable proof the vaccines are killing people. Nobody noticed.

NOV 5, 2023

Executive summary

1. The vaccines are clearly killing people. You can see that from the Israeli MoH data. But that data was first made public in a tweet from MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023. It made no difference.
2. The medical community and health authorities are simply inept or corrupt or both. You cannot have a 9X variation in Figure 2. That’s crazy. Any sane person would have demanded an end to the vaccine program immediately. How come everyone in mainstream medicine missed this?
3. Your risk of death monotonically increases from the time you get the shot, peaking at around 3 to 4 months after shot #2. For other doses, it just climbs and then plateaus.
4. The mortality risk curve is opposite in slope to what doctors expect (you are more likely to die later than sooner), so doctors fail to associate a death with the vaccine injection. This allows the vaccine to hide under the radar undetected.
5. Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot number. For example, if your risk of death increased 5% on shot #1, it might increase another 6% on shot #2, another 9% on shot #3, 18% on shot #4, 50% on shot #5, etc. It’s like shooting yourself with a poison each time. This explains why the excess deaths keep going up worldwide even though booster adoption is going down.
6. Lot variation is real. Some lots kill 30X more per dose than others. How is that possible with a safe vaccine? This alone should kill the “safe and effective” narrative.
7. The healthy vaccine temporal effect is complete bullshit, a gaslighting technique used to explain the data. The Israeli data shown below makes that crystal clear. HVE, if it exists, should be an exponentially decaying effect like the charge curve of a capacitor.
8. The lack of transparency of record-level public health data allows them to keep killing people without getting caught. Nobody pushing the jabs is calling for data transparency of public health data. This is a huge red flag. This is a sign of a corrupt, out of control government. And no, you cannot FOIA this information. That has never been done anywhere, ever. Once this data is made public, it’s all over.

Fauci Lied, People Died: French Study Is Latest to Find Hydroxychloroquine Is Associated with Lower COVID-19 Mortality Rates   By Jim Hoft

Nov. 4, 2023 8:30 am – The Gateway Pundit reported extensively since 2020 on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in treating the COVID-19 virus.

We also reported that Dr. Tony Fauci and the medical elites conspired to ban the use of this very successful drug.

We reported earlier on how Dr. Fauci used bogus studies to disqualify HCQ in treating coronavirus.

Then in June 2021, there was new information that Dr. Fauci and top US medical experts all conspired using obviously false information to disqualify hydroxychloroquine and MILLIONS DIED as a result of their action.

Comparative Risks of Myocarditis and Pericarditis with mRNA, Adenoviral DNA, and Spike Antigen Vaccines   PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD

WHO VigiBase Gives Rare Look at Differential Risks

NOV 4, 2023 – Early in the COVID-19 vaccine campaign people used to ask me “which vaccine is the safest?” Americans have never been given an analysis of comparative safety among the available COVID-19 vaccines. The US military, corporations, schools, and other entities mandating the vaccines never cared which one was taken. There was no interest in determining “the best” COVID-19 vaccine. President Biden infamously said “just get vaccinated.”

The US CDC has pushed the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines because their marketing firm Weber Shandwick has a promotional unit inside the CDC vaccine office in Atlanta. The NIH is the co-owner of the Moderna mRNA patent. The US government is among the top licensees of mRNA patents. This obvious corruption and conflict of interest has misled the country. Among Americans who took a vaccine, 94% received an mRNA vaccine.

Saint-Gerons et al reported on 61,812 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis in the WHO VigiBase and found all three major classes of vaccines have elevated risks, however the mRNA vaccines consistently are the most risky. However for pericarditis alone, the Spike protein antigen vaccine from Novavax had the largest point-estimate. Because of the small numbers, the measures of central tendency are a statistical blur and we must rely to a greater degree on confidence intervals. There were 61 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis with Novavax and none were fatal. While overall Novavax is probably the safest vaccine, I can tell you as a cardiologist, cardiac risks are too high for any heart specialist to recommend COVID-19 vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 Variant HV.1; Obsolete Boosters   ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

No evidence that current boosters are “safe and effective” against dominant HV.1 variant

NOV 4, 2023 – As previously covered (here), the currently available FDA emergency use authorized “booster vaccines” were designed based on recommendations developed at the FDA VRPBAC (vaccine and related products biological advisory committee), which predicted that the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant this fall would be the “Kraken” (XBB.1.5) viral variant of Omicron.

To re-cap, the FDA and it’s advisory committee are operating based on the hypothesis that the dominant mechanism of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, spread, and COVID-19 disease afforded by vaccination or natural immunity involves “neutralizing antibodies”. This hypothesis is unproven, and no immunologic “correlate of protection” which predicts protection from either infection or disease has been clinically proven. To the extent that high levels of human “neutralizing antibodies” from the SARS-CoV-2 genetic “vaccines” provide any protection, they seem to “correlate” to reduced disease severity for some period after dosing, but do not prevent infection, replication, spread, disease or death.

Despite this undeniable fact, the FDA has disregarded its decades long policies concerning the requirement to validate a “correlate of protection” test before it can be used as a surrogate for actual clinical demonstration that a “vaccine” product will protect against infection, replication, spread, disease or death. Until so proven, historically a vaccine developer has been forbidden from making any claim of protection unless that claim is demonstrated and statistically ”validated”. Validation requiring some sort of well controlled human clinical trials. Alternatively, a vaccine developer can create a well-controlled “correlate of protection” laboratory test that employs human samples, and statistically demonstrate that it predicts (correlates) a relevant clinical outcome (ergo preventing infection, spread, severe disease of death). Only then can such the outcomes of such a test be used as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, rather than actually clinically testing whether the product has a significant impact on the intended endpoint.

Shedding Part 3 – Can You Absorb Lipid Nanoparticles From Being Exposed To a Vaccinated Person?   PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA

I review all the routes of entry into the human body that mRNA vaccine nanoparticles can take.. and the ease in which they do so. The most troubling is via inhalation.

NOV 1, 2023 – In this post, I will review the ways in which the synthetic lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), used in the Covid mRNA vaccines (as well as natural LNPs called exosomes) can be absorbed into the body.

First, a summary of the data presented in my first 2 posts here and here:

1. The Covid mRNA vaccines meet the regulatory definition of a gene therapy product
2. Gene therapy products are required to undergo both animal and human shedding studies (the latter were not done and the results of the former have not been made public by Pfizer).
3. Shedding studies are required because the mRNA is delivered to the cell via lipid nano-particles and LNP’s are distributed widely in the body
4. Pfizer specifically excluded subjects who could be closely exposed to a trial subject that had already received the vaccine.
5. The gene therapy product called Luxterna has a warning on its insert that the product can be shed via tears and nasal secretions.

Where is the evidence that LNP’s from vaccinated folks can be transmitted to and subsequently enter our bodies? From this review of nanoparticles (i.e LNPs/exosomes) they state:

As far as the exposure of humans to NPs is concerned, they can enter the body through inhalation, ingestion, skin uptake, injection, or implantation. It is also interesting to note that NP uptake could be intentional or non-intentional.

Non-intentional? From the article: “Some exposures are unintentional, such as pulmonary inhalation of NPs in the environment or at manufacturing sites.”

This figure illustrates the various routes of absorption and dissemination throughout the body:

“Shedding” Part 8 – A Deluge Of Clinical Shedding Anecdotes Pour In   PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA

Increasing numbers of people are reporting to me prior episodes of sudden-onset vaccine side effect symptoms after an exposure to vaccinated people. Remember, the plural of anecdotes is… data.

NOV 4, 2023 – In no particular order, I present, unaltered, the spontaneous descriptions posted by some of my over 70,000 Substack subscribers. They are writing them under the comments section of earlier posts in this series or are sending them to me privately via email.

If you read Posts 6, 7, and 8, note the totality, consistency, and similarities of the clinical anecdotes submitted by people who don’t know each other and are not expert in vaccine injury syndrome/symptoms (in some cases they were not aware of shedding until having read my post and then recalled these events). I find that the totality of the posts are conclusive evidence that clinically significant shedding occurs.

Also know that, as an evolving expert in the study, evaluation, and treatment of vaccine injuries, abnormal menses (things like absence, irregularity, heaviness or “strangeness” of flow with odd looking clots) is one of, if not the most, common side effect of the mRNA nanoparticle vaccines in women. Further, I find some of the below reports both alarming and heartbreaking given that in a minority of reports, people describe intense chronic suffering initiated by a shedding event, akin to the suffering we see in our Long Vax clinic patients.

Remember the school in Miami that prohibited teachers and students from coming to school for up to 30 days after each vaccination? They implemented this policy very early on in the campaign too: