COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]
Govt. Researchers: Flu Shots Not Effective in Elderly, After All BY SHARYL ATTKISSON
SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 – This story was first published on CBS News in 2006
An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done nearly a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially.
The authors of the study admitted a bias going into the study. Here was the history as described to me: Public health experts long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate a benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong–instead of believing the scientific data–the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong. After all, flu shots have to work, right?
So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit.
But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The scientists finally had to acknowledge that decades of public health thought had been mistaken.
Read the government study that found no flu shot benefit in elderly
Here’s How They’re Excusing Away the Rising Jab-Induced Deaths Coming in 2024 JD RUCKER
They always knew they would need to make an excuse for the Big Pharma kill shots. Now we’re seeing it manifest before us.
DEC 31, 2023 – Scientists are warning that a new COVID strain will cause a global “heart failure pandemic,” prompting much skepticism.
A new strain known as JN.1 will cause many people to suffer from “reduced cardiac function,” according to the report.
“Japan’s top research institute Riken has now issued a warning in the new report, which states that the ACE2 receptors, which the coronavirus clings to within human cells, are ‘very common’ in the heart,” reports GB News.
In memory of the children who “died suddenly” in the USA and Canada in 2023: Children 11- 20 MARK CRISPIN MILLER
DEC 30, 2023 – This is the last of four posts on the staggering number of child deaths in North America this year
How stupid can you get? With masks now BACK, we’re finding out… MARK CRISPIN MILLER
Nearly four years later, maybe we should try, though tardily, to shoot this Big Lie down
DEC 29, 2023 – On the use of masks to block transmission of respiratory viruses, there were those who actually read through the science, while there were many, many more who read “the science” as transmitted by the New York Times and all the rest of “our free press.”
The science that some read—which is to say, more honestly, the science that we read—was, by 2020, readily available in all the randomized, controlled studies of masking carried out in hospitals, all of which had found that masks do not prevent transmission of such viruses. (By early 2020 there were ten such studies, whereas there are now many more, which bolster the conclusion of those ten.) That strong consensus was then reconfirmed by the abundant epidemiological data from states throughout the USA, and countries all around the world. All that data made it clear as day that (1) “COVID” rates were highest where the masking was most prevalent, and (2) those rates started spiking after masking was successfully imposed.
This by-now-well-established fact was contradicted by “the science” pumped out by the media, which took their lead from Dr. Fauci and the CDC and WHO, which took their lead from Dr. George Gao, Fauci’s Chinese counterpart. Before they pivoted to China’s superstitious line on masks, all three of those authorities had reconfirmed the science on the matter, claiming publicly—and rightly—that masks do not prevent transmission.
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” infectious disease expert [sic] Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes.
While masks may block some droplets, Fauci said, they do not provide the level of protection people think they do. Wearing a mask may also have unintended consequences: People who wear masks tend to touch their face more often to adjust them, which can spread germs from their hands.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/preventing-coronavirus-facemask-60-minutes-2020-03-08/
Later, on the basis of what he called “further studies” (a/k/a “the science”), Fauci doubled down by urging everyone to wear two masks.
[Ed.:
