COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. The Hippocratic Oath is no longer applicable… They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .
RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie [1:00:59]
Premiered Aug 11, 2025
This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com
00:00 Intro
02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues
06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative
06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines
07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment
08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines
09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone
12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination
14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health
14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects
17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns
18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community
21:17 Explaining mRNA
23:45 How mRNA vaccines work
27:06 Spike protein and possible effects
30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings
32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance
33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children
34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues
39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology
42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues
45:12 History of mRNA vaccines
46:44 Modified mRNA technology
48:40 mRNA research status in 2017
49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017
49:33 Progress in mRNA technology
49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic
55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome
57:06 Doctors offering assistance
[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:
1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio
2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism
4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition
Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering
[Ed.: An Inconvenient Study Full Movie [1:20:36]
Here is the link to the documentary An Inconvenient Study, which premiered tonight at the Malibu Film Festival. It is the brilliant true story of the suppression of a vaxed vs unvaxed children’s study and the Henry Ford Health Center–suppressed because it showed over several years 3-6 TIMES the incidence of chronic illness between children who had even ONE childhood vaccine compared with children compared with children who had NO vaccines. PLUS there was ZERO autism, ADHD and a couple of other things in the unvaxed cohort.
Watch the entire video and be sure to share it with everyone you think SHOULD KNOW about what it shows!
The Dam Is Breaking: We’re Making America Healthy Again A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
The remarkable changes on the horizon and forces conspiring to stop them
DEC 07, 2025
At a young age, after becoming aware of many of the issues in the world, I gradually got pulled into an addictive sea of negativity and frustration over how things were and the fact they kept getting worse. As this was not healthy or productive, in time, I decided the best way to cope with this situation was to shift my focus on what I could do to make things better and be at peace with the fact I was doing something rather than torn apart over everything I wished was different but was powerless to change.
Because of this, my focus gradually shifted to seeing the existing trends in society (e.g., more medical corruption and increasingly dangerous pharmaceutical regimens being forced upon the public) and trying to identify any possible window to shift them. This perspective, for instance, both allowed me to avoid becoming completely distraught over what unfolded during COVID-19, and likewise to keep searching for a way to help avert the catastrophic course we were on, even though doing this seemed nearly impossible, given the monolithic forces we were against.
Likewise, I long ago accepted that the bulk of the medical system and leadership in the government will be incapable of deviating from the pharmaceutical industry’s narrative, regardless of how much those beliefs are at odds with reality or what the public wants. As such, rather than become upset about the continual abhorrent revelations that come out (e.g., all the ways the FDA and CDC covered up COVID vaccines and injuries and death), I’ve simply been grateful we’ve entered a political climate where those revelations can come out.
Making America Healthy Again
Due to how much influence the pharmaceutical industry has over the government and media, until fairly recently, I never imagined a group that would directly oppose their interests could come into power. Yet, due to the public backlash against the egregious profiteering we saw throughout COVID-19, the convergence of a few longstanding political trends (e.g., the Tea Party moving vaccine skepticism into the Republican Party) and Trump requiring RFK Jr.’s political coalition to win the 2020 election—it did.
Because of this, we are now again in a situation of “glass half empty or half full” situation, as on one hand, it is beyond extraordinary RFK Jr. became the H.H.S. Secretary while on the other, it’s disappointing that he has not yet enacted many of the policies we wanted done on day one.
Presently, I am in the former camp, in part because of how much opposition we’ve had to overcome to get things to where they are currently (which has taken a lot of work on our part) and because, knowing the forces he is up against, I feel that if I were the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary, I would have gotten much less done at this point than RFK Jr. has.
Likewise, as hard as it is to get things done now (e.g., health bureaucrats throughout the HHS are continually trying to sabotage RFK Jr.’s efforts), I know things will become infinitely more challenging after the next election when there is no longer strong top down support to enact MAHA policies. So, were I in RFK Jr’s position, my own focus would be directed towards using the once in a lifetime window we have right now to enact long term structural changes rather than focusing on short term gains that will be swept away by the next administration.
I mention all of this because currently, the playbook the pharmaceutical industry seems to be using to kill our window to change things is to stall and delay things as much as possible so that by the time RFK Jr.’s term ends, nothing will yet have gotten done to enact those critical long-term changes. As such, our focus has been on trying to counteract each approach being used to stall Making America Healthy Again (e.g., that’s why we’ve put so much work into exposing the financial conflicts of interest Congressmen and Senators actively sabotaging MAHA have).
Presently, one of the primary tactics being used to obstruct MAHA has been to split the base so they fight against each other rather than uniting behind their shared goal (as this is one of the most reliable ways to fracture populist movements) by shifting our focus from what is getting done to what is not getting done as it is critical for the pharmaceutical industry that the MAHA support which won 2024 is not present for the 2026 midterms.
Note: a lot of influencers are trying to promote this black-pilled message about MAHA. Many believe this is being funded by the industry, but I feel it is equally plausible that those influencers are simply chasing clicks (as negativity and hysteria are the easiest forms of journalism to market).
Because of this, I firmly believe our focus at this point should be on what we can do to make things better and thankful for each previously impossible thing we enact.
The CDC Vaccine Schedule
I have long believed inertia, beyond being a physical principle, also applies to groups and bureaucratic structures. This is why, for example, as the years go by, more and more increasingly dangerous vaccinations get “recommended” (mandated) for all of our children, and why regardless of the evidence against them, virtually every vaccine will be added to the CDC vaccine schedule and none will ever be withdrawn from it.
I feel this was best highlighted by the COVID vaccines for children, as the risk of death from COVID in children was effectively zero (as the only known cases were in severely immunocompromised individuals), while conversely, there were many cases of healthy children dying suddenly in a similar manner after vaccination. Yet, despite the mortality benefit clearly favoring not vaccinating, and this specific “recommendation” provoking more public pushback than any other childhood vaccine policy in history, the entire medical apparatus continued to double-down on it.
As such, while many felt differently, I was pleasantly surprised that it only took RFK Jr. 15 weeks (from taking office) to lay the necessary groundwork to remove the COVID vaccine from the childhood vaccine schedule—particularly since the last time a vaccine was taken off the childhood CDC schedule (excluding occasional instances where one was replaced with a newer version) was the smallpox vaccine in 1972.
Note: RFK’s decision to stop recommending the COVID vaccines to children and pregnant women (which had serious unresolved safety concerns) was met with widespread opposition, eventually resulting in numerous Democrat states breaking from the CDC to adopt their own (COVID including) vaccine schedules and Senate hearings against RFK Jr.
Despite this pushback, I was nonetheless hopeful MAHA would then turn their attention to the next most unjustifiable vaccine on the CDC schedule, newborn Hepatitis B vaccination (and possibly also consider questioning the other particularly egregious vaccination—the HPV vaccine Gardasil).
Because of this, once RFK replaced the membership of ACIP (the committee that crafts the CDC’s vaccine schedule) with ACIP members not beholden to the pharmaceutical industry and I learned (in September) that the newborn hepatitis B was up for discussion, we began a large project to try and bring public awareness to the very real dangers of this vaccine and the fact there was no justifiable reason to give it to every newborn.
Remarkably, despite numerous attempts to delay and sabotage this (along with widespread hysteria from the medical field), on Friday, a vote was finally held and at long last—and thanks to a variety of things coming together (e.g., many of you hearing the call and making your voices heard on the issue), something many of us, for decades, never imagined could happen—the hepatitis B vaccine was removed from the infant vaccine schedule.
Even more remarkably, immediately afterwards, President Trump, building on this momentum, made a rather extraordinary announcement that again illustrates we are in a historic window most of us previously never imagined would occur.
STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
The single largest vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) finds risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after flu and pneumococcal shots.
DEC 07, 2025
The single largest and most rigorous study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia — spanning 13.3 million UK adults — has uncovered a deeply troubling pattern: those who received common adult vaccines faced a significantly higher risk of both dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.
The risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. With each layer of statistical adjustment, the signal doesn’t fade — it becomes sharper, more consistent, and increasingly difficult to explain away.
And critically, these associations persisted even after adjusting for an unusually wide range of potential confounders, including age, sex, socioeconomic status, BMI, smoking, alcohol-related disorders, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, coronary artery disease, stroke/TIA, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney and liver disease, depression, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, traumatic brain injury, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, and dozens of medications ranging from NSAIDs and opioids to statins, antiplatelets, immunosuppressants, and antidepressants.
Even after controlling for this extensive list, the elevated risks remained strong and remarkably stable.
Vaccinated Adults Had a 38% Higher Risk of Dementia
The primary adjusted model showed that adults receiving common adult vaccines (influenza, pneumococcal, shingles, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) had a:
38% increased risk of developing dementia (OR 1.38)
This alone dismantles the narrative of “vaccines protect the brain,” but the deeper findings are far worse.
Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Is Even Higher — 50% Increased Risk
Buried in the supplemental tables is a more shocking result: when the authors restricted analyses to Alzheimer’s disease specifically, the association grew even stronger.
50% increased risk of Alzheimer’s (Adjusted OR 1.50)
This indicates the effect is not random. The association intensifies for the most devastating subtype of dementia.
Clear Dose–Response Pattern: More Vaccines = Higher Risk
The authors ran multiple dose–response models, and every one of them shows the same pattern:
Dementia (all types)
From eTable 2:
- 1 vaccine dose → Adjusted OR 1.26 (26% higher risk)
- 2–3 doses → Adjusted OR 1.32 (32% higher risk)
- 4–7 doses → Adjusted OR 1.42 (42% higher risk)
- 8–12 doses → Adjusted OR 1.50 (50% higher risk)
- ≥13 doses → Adjusted OR 1.55 (55% higher risk)
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) Shows the Same—and Even Stronger—Trend
From eTable 7:
- 1 dose → Adjusted OR 1.32 (32% higher risk)
- 2–3 doses → Adjusted OR 1.41 (41% higher risk)
- ≥4 doses → Adjusted OR 1.61 (61% higher risk)
This is one of the most powerful and unmistakable signals in epidemiology.
Time–Response Curve: Risk Peaks Soon After Vaccination and Remains Elevated for Years
Another signal strongly inconsistent with mere bias: a time-response relationship.
The highest dementia risk occurs 2–4.9 years after vaccination (Adjusted OR 1.56). The risk then slowly attenuates but never returns to baseline, remaining elevated across all time windows.
After 12.5 years, the risk is still meaningfully elevated (Adjusted OR 1.28) — a persistence incompatible with short-term “detection bias” and suggestive of a long-lasting biological impact.
This pattern is what you expect from a biological trigger with long-latency neuroinflammatory or neurodegenerative consequences.
Even After a 10-Year Lag, the Increased Risk Does Not Disappear
When the authors apply a long 10-year lag — meant to eliminate early detection bias — the elevated risk persists:
- Dementia: OR 1.20
- Alzheimer’s: OR 1.26
If this were simply “people who see doctors more often get diagnosed earlier,” the association should disappear under long lag correction.
Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines Drive the Signal
Two vaccines show particularly strong associations:
Influenza vaccine
- Dementia: OR 1.39 → 39% higher risk
- Alzheimer’s: OR 1.49 → 49% higher risk
Pneumococcal vaccine
- Dementia: OR 1.12 → 12% higher risk
- Alzheimer’s: OR 1.15 → 15% higher risk
And again, both exhibit dose–response escalation — the hallmark pattern of a genuine exposure–outcome relationship.
Taken together, the findings across primary, supplemental, dose–response, time–response, stratified, and sensitivity analyses paint the same picture:
• A consistent association between cumulative vaccination and increased dementia risk
• A stronger association for Alzheimer’s than for general dementia
• A dose–response effect — more vaccines, higher risk
• A time–response effect — risk peaks after exposure and persists long-term
• Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines strongly drive the signal
• The association remains after 10-year lag correction and active comparator controls
This is what a robust epidemiologic signal looks like.
In the largest single study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia, common adult vaccinations were associated with a 38% higher risk of dementia and a 50% higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease. The risk increases with more doses, persists for a decade, and is strongest for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines.
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
