COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]
Dr. Peter McCullough Warns of ‘One-World Government Coming Our Way’ THE VIGILANT FOX
“This is all prima facie evidence that we see a worldwide power grab going on.”
FEB 7, 2024 – “The next pandemic is not a matter of if but of when,” says veterinarian and WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Klaus Schwab, the WEF, and the so-called global elites gathered for a 5-day annual meeting in Davos from January 15-19. One of the topics on their agenda that raised some eyeballs was “Preparing for Disease X.”
COVID has been reported, although likely inflated, to have claimed approximately 7 million lives worldwide, but “Disease X,” on the other hand, they warn, “could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.”
As such, Dr. McCullough argued, “Shouldn’t we shut down these dangerous biological programs so we don’t have another worldwide disaster?”
However, he claimed, “They [WHO and WEF] are dreaming about more vaccines, antibodies, therapeutics, and worldwide control based on Disease X, as opposed to eliminating Disease X or any potential biological threat that could come our way.”
Why is that? “The short answer is,” Dr. McCullough says, “there’s too much money in it.”
“The money now in this biological threat countermeasure world is enormous,” he continued. “We found that out with COVID-19, and we see all kinds of runaway programs. Moderna has 31 messenger RNA vaccines — 31,” Dr. McCullough stressed.
“The first sets of messenger RNA vaccines, Pfizer, Moderna, have not turned out well at all. They didn’t stop Covid, and they haven’t been proven to be safe. 31 [messenger RNA shots] coming our way now … So this biopharmaceutical complex that’s formed has really figured out how to run the table.”
Power Grab
[Ed.:
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, January 29-February 5, 2024 MARK CRISPIN MILLER
FEB 7, 2024 – Musicians in the US (3), Brazil, Argentina, UK (2), Croatia, Italy, Ghana, Iran, Turkey; actors in US (2), Dominica, Argentina, UK (2), Kenya, India, China; journalists in US (5), Poland; & more
1st Peer Reviewed Study Proves Big Pharma Knew about COVID Vax Dangers and Ineffectiveness (Video 31:58) By Grant Stinchfield
Feb. 7, 2024 9:00 am – Scientists are calling for a global moratorium on MRNA Vaccines as well as the immediate removal from childhood vaccine schedules. This is the 1st ever peer reviewed study of its kind. Published in the medical journal Cureus, the study found the following about the COVID MRNA vaccines:
1. They were rushed to market.
2. Researchers under-estimated adverse reactions including death.
3. Researchers over-estimated effectiveness.
4. Researchers didn’t appropriately test for Toxicity and manufacturing imperfections.
5. Serious adverse reactions were well documented but ignored.
The authors say that reanalyzed data from the vaccine makers’ trials and high rates of serious post-injection injuries indicate the mRNA gene therapy vaccines should not have been authorized for use. Chief of Maternal and Prenatal Health, Dr. James Thorp M.D. from the Wellness Company is with me to discuss.
[Ed.:
‘Global Moratorium’ for COVID Shots? Mainstream Science Considering Halt By Bob Unruh
Feb. 7, 2024 10:00 am – ‘Statistically significant increases in serious adverse events’
For months while the COVID-19 virus, which came out of a Chinese lab experimenting on making those health threats more dangerous, circled the globe and killed millions, science journals adopted a uniform talking point: Get the shots!
That, according to a new report, now has changed, with the publication in the Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, a sibling of Nature and Scientific American, a peer-reviewed paper by mRNA shot critics.
It reveals that the results from the shots are not all good.
In fact, they can be bad.
Longtime COVID shot skeptic Steve Kirsch posted online: “People have said I’m a misinformation spreader because since May 2021, I have been publicly saying the COVID vaccines are not safe. Now the medical peer-reviewed literature shows I was right.”
A report in Just the News points out that mainstream science and medical journals for months, even years, suppressed doubts and concerns about the shots, for which manufacturers were paid billions.
In fact, the federal government, led by COVID shot cheerleader Anthony Fauci, worked to suppress valid evidence undermining the promotion of those shots.
The new article, in fact, lends support for the idea of a global moratorium on those shots.
Fluoride On Trial: The Censored Science on Fluoride and Your Health [Full Video 1:02:38] Children’s Health Defense
This revealing documentary produced by CHD.TV sounds the alarm on the dangers of fluoride and the U.S. government’s nefarious attempt to conceal the truth.
Fluoride on Trial: The Censored Science on Fluoride and Your Health dives into a groundbreaking lawsuit that bans the addition of fluoride chemicals to our water in the United States. Lead attorney on the case, Michael Connett, sits down with Children’s Health Defense President, Mary Holland to pull back the curtain on fluoride and provide a blow-by-blow review of documents unearthed by the Freedom of Information Act. These documents show that a landmark federal review of fluoride’s hazards to the brain has been blocked by political leadership at the highest levels of the Department of Health & Human Services. Several shocking interviews of federal health experts deposed in the case, including representatives for the Center for Disease Control and the Environmental Protection Agency, reveal the unsettling truth about fluoride.
mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Peer-Reviewed Study Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
WEDNESDAY, FEB 07, 2024 – 05:00 AM – With considerably lower efficacy rates, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cause more deaths than save lives, according to a new study whose researchers called for a “global moratorium” on the shots and “immediate removal” from childhood immunization schedule.
The peer-reviewed study, published in the Cureus journal on Jan. 24, analyzed reports from the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. These trials led to the shots being approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States. The study also looked into several other research and reviews of the trials. It found that the vaccines had “dramatically lower” efficacy rates than the vaccine companies claimed.
Moreover, based on “conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”
“Given the well-documented SAEs (serious adverse events) and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”
The authors also recommended an “immediate removal” of the COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule. They pointed out that children were at very low risk from the infection.
“It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 but a well-established 2.2 percent risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available.”
Very Low Efficacy Rate
Following the first trials of Pfizer and Moderna, it was claimed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines had a 95 percent reduction of symptomatic COVID-19. The study pointed out that this efficacy assumption was false.
[Ed.: How Bad is my Batch? Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines]
I-RECOVER FLCCC ALLIANCE
POST-VACCINE TREATMENT PROTOCOL
Post-vaccine syndrome is a complex disease. Treatment must be individualized according to each patient’s presenting symptoms and disease syndromes. Not all patients respond equally to the same intervention. Early treatment is essential; the response to treatment will likely be weaker when treatment is delayed.
This document is designed for healthcare providers caring for patients with symptoms following a COVID injection. While a handful of the therapies can be self-administered, we strongly recommend that patients consult with a healthcare provider before beginning any new treatment. (To find a provider, consult FLCCC’s provider directory.)
There are also some important cautions and contraindications that should be carefully reviewed within the more comprehensive and detailed document called “An Approach to Managing Post-Vaccine Syndrome” and which should be discussed with a qualified provider as well.
This information is not intended to serve as a substitute for diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified, licensed medical professional. The facts presented are offered as information — not medical advice. Any treatment protocol should be discussed with a trusted, licensed medical professional. Never stop or change medications without consulting your healthcare provider.
Treatment approach
It is important to emphasize that, since there are no published reports detailing how to treat vaccine-injured patients, our treatment approach is based on the postulated pathogenetic mechanisms, principles of pharmacology, clinical observations, and feedback from vaccine-injured patients themselves. We are constantly updating the approach as new data emerges and based on consultation with trusted healthcare providers.
Patients with post-vaccine syndrome must not receive further COVID-19 vaccines of any type. Likewise, patients with long COVID should avoid all COVID vaccinations.
Patients with post-vaccine syndrome should do whatever they can to prevent themselves from getting COVID-19. This may include a preventative protocol (see I-PREVENT) or early treatment in the event you do contract the virus or suspect infection (see I-CARE). COVID-19 will likely exacerbate the symptoms of vaccine injury.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/protocol/i-recover-post-vaccine-treatment/
68 American colleges still have Covid vaccine mandates in place JORDAN SCHACHTEL
Harvard is among the many U.S. schools that remain committed to the Safety Regime.
FEB 6, 2024 – Thanks to the invaluable work of No College Mandates, we know that as of February 6, 2024, an astounding 68 American colleges and universities still have Covid shot mandates in place.
Yes, you read that correctly. There are 68 schools in the United States that continue to push the mRNA serum on college students across America.
The list includes historically elite schools like Harvard and Johns Hopkins. It also includes a variety of ultra leftist colleges in California and New York, and elsewhere, coupled with a significant amount of historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs).
Speaking of Harvard, they just announced that students must comply with the Covid mandate if they wish to enroll for the upcoming 2024-2025 academic year. Notably, the requirement does not apply to faculty and staff.
“Harvard is the only Ivy League that still requires students to show proof that they have taken either the initial COVID vaccine series (which is no longer available) or the most up-to-date booster even though no such requirement exists for faculty and staff,” Lucia Sinatra, the co-founder of No College Mandates, tells The Dossier.
“How does this make any sense from a public health perspective? It doesn’t. It is discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious, and the fact that students let it stand speaks volumes about allegiance to their ideological beliefs over their pursuit of truth.”
There is no reason to believe that Covid shots are a necessary health measure for the broader campus community. So it’s safe to assume that there’s an ulterior motive or two to the reality that it’s February of 2024 and the mandates remain in place on campuses.
Exclusive: NTP Scientific Director Tells The Defender What He Couldn’t Tell the Court By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
The National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) former scientific director Brian Berridge, DVM, Ph.D., on Monday testified in the landmark fluoride trial. The judge didn’t allow testimony about possible political influence over the NTP report’s publication, but Berridge told The Defender after the hearing that such pressures raised serious concerns for public health.
02/06/24 – Editor’s note: The Defender is providing daily updates on the landmark trial pitting Fluoride Action Network against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The trial started Feb. 1. To read previous coverage, click here.
The former scientific director of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) on Monday took the stand on the fourth day of a landmark trial on water fluoridation, despite efforts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to scuttle his testimony.
Brian Berridge, DVM, Ph.D., testified about the initial findings in the NTP’s draft report linking fluoride to lower IQ in children.
Berridge also outlined the process leading up to the court-ordered release of the report in March 2023. He was limited to discussing the formal NTP report publication process — not his thoughts on whether political concerns may have influenced or delayed that process — because of an April 2023 ruling that those observations fall outside the scope of the trial.
However, The Defender later in the day caught up with Berridge, who was able to speak more freely about his concerns.
What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
Please share yours as well so we can unravel this mystery
JAN 7, 2024
Story at a Glance:
•After the COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, stories began emerging of unvaccinated individuals becoming ill after being in proximity to recently vaccinated individuals. This confused many, as the mRNA technology in theory should not be able to “shed.”
•At this point, we believe this is a real phenomenon as we have seen numerous patient cases which can only be explained by mRNA shedding.
•Some of the most frequent questions about shedding include: “how much do I need to consider mRNA shedding when dating?” “is vaccinated blood safe?” “how do I protect myself from shedding?” and “what are the potential mechanisms that could explain how shedding is possible?”
•In this article, we will present everything we currently know about shedding (e.g., the evidence for it, who tends to shed, who is affected by shedding, what symptoms are typically observed after shedding). Much of this has been made possible by the hundreds of individuals who have shared their shedding experiences—if you can, please share your story too.
Note: after publishing the original article, it received a lot of feedback (e.g., a tweet about it received over 500,000 views). This is a significantly revised version of the previous article which takes into account what has been learned since then. Over the next month, I will continue revising it as we receive more shedding reports.
When doctors in this movement speak at events about the vaccines, by far the most common question they receive is “is vaccine shedding real?”
This is understandable as COVID vaccine shedding (becoming ill from vaccinated individuals) represents the one way the unvaccinated are also at risk from the vaccines and hence still need to be directly concerned about them.
Simultaneously, this is a difficult question to answer for a few key reasons.
COVID Shot Glitch: Is a Pfrankenstein Protein Rewriting Your DNA? Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
February 6, 2024 – A ‘glitch’ has been found in the COVID-19 shots – your body is being hijacked to make ‘Pfrankenstein proteins’ and we have no idea what their toxicity is or how it could change your DNA. Sounds nutty? It’s not, according to Tucker Carlson and the surgeon general of Florida.
You’ve Been Genetically Hijacked to Produce Pfizer’s Pfrankenstein Proteins
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 shots instruct cells to produce additional “off-target” proteins that could pose significant health risks
- The finding was revealed by a team of U.K. researchers, who found a “glitch” occurred due to the way the COVID-19 shots were genetically modified
- According to the study, off-target cellular immune responses occur in 25% to 33% of those who have received Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot
- The “Pfrankenstein” proteins could potentially lead to health problems, including autoimmune conditions or endocrine disruption
- Pfizer’s Pfrankenstein proteins should have been detected and reduced or eliminated long before mRNA COVID-19 shots were given to millions of people
Explosive Investigation Uncovers a Global Shadow Government’s Secret Control Over “Elected” Governments & Public Health Bodies, Forging a Global Vaccine Regime 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
FEB 4, 2024 – by The Exposé – The same organisations that have an interest in vaccinations today also had a lot of influence in laying the groundwork decades ago. People tend to think of these large and well-known organisations – such as the Rockefeller Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF; CDC, GAVI, USAID, and the World Bank – as independent of each other, but they are not. They are part of a vaccine infrastructure – a global vaccine regime. Or, as Nations in Action describes it, the vaccine shadow government architecture.
The architecture is headed by wealthy investors who have created funds and foundations which then engage in various funding activities, while also being responsible for assisting politicians to be elected, or placed, into office. At the same time, the foundations donate to international organisations giving the foundations access to and enabling them to steer the organisations toward certain conclusions.
In short, wealthy organisations and individuals are getting you and your government to pay for and implement private interests through public policies. Policies that are geared towards a pre-determined conclusion that is to the benefit of those wealthy interests.
What is the World Shadow Government?
According to French billionaire and RDH President Philippe Argillier, the shadow government is the actual government that gives official orders to the elected government. There is an extremely powerful entity behind the scene that involves very influential individuals in finance as well as in politics, including some heads of state.
“Altogether, 38 individuals run the daily lives of 8 billion people on Earth … The Biden administration is under the control of the shadow government. I can confirm this without any hesitation based upon the information that I have,” Argillier told Nations in Action.
You can watch the full 20-minute interview ‘Global Leaders Strategise Ending the Shadow Government’ Part I HERE where Philippe Argillier explained the Shadow Government and the dynamic power of the databanks he has in his possession.
The World’s First Dating Website for the UNVACCINATED is Here! Sign up For “UNJECTED” Now and Meet Other Singles That SAID NO TO THE COVID VACCINE! VIDEOS! By Cara Castronuova
Feb. 4, 2024 9:20 am – The world’s first dating site for the Covid unvaccinated is here.
“Vaccination by insemination is something that concerns some women,” said “Unjected.com” founder Shelby Hosana. “Studies show the spike protein has been found in every bodily fluid there is- saliva, breast milk, sperm, vaginal fluid, blood, even your breath… it a concern of women and men alike.”
Please see our interview with “Unjected” business partner, Foster Coulson (also founder of “The Wellness Company”) here:
[Ed.:
Peter Sweden: WOAH-Bill Gates Invested MILLIONS in BioNTech JUST BEFORE Covid By Peter Imanuelsen, also known as PeterSweden
Feb. 3, 2024 7:00 pm – This must just be a coincidence…
I recently discovered something very weird.
Did you know that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation just so happened to invest a whopping $55 MILLION in BioNTech?
You know, the company that partnered with Pfizer to make their mRNA covid vaccine and drove Pfizer’s revenue to a record $100 billion in 2022.
Well, I had a look and found something very interesting indeed. When did Bill Gates invest this large sum of money?
Turns out that it was on the 4th of September 2019,.
Covid was discovered just two months later in November 2019 (at least the first time we got to hear about it).
This turned out to be very profitable for Bill Gates, his investment increased by 10 times! Just a few years later, the original $55 million was worth over $550 million.
“the collaboration will fund the identification of potential HIV and tuberculosis vaccine and immunotherapy candidates and their pre-clinical development. It will further enable BioNTech to build out its infectious disease infrastructure, including platform development” – it says in the press release from BioNTech.
Guess what?
Bill Gates has also donated some $20 million to the BBC.
Now it is being reported that the BBC misrepresented the risk of covid in order to boost public support for lockdown.
[Ed.:
Fluoride on Trial, Day 2: Fluoride Poses Risks to Pregnant Women, Too By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
During the second day of testimony in a landmark fluoride trial, expert witnesses presented evidence that fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children and that it poses risks to pregnant mothers.
Editor’s note: The Defender is providing daily updates on the landmark trial pitting Fluoride Action Network against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency taking place in San Francisco, beginning Feb. 1. To read previous coverage, click here.
During the second day of testimony in a landmark fluoride trial, expert witnesses presented evidence that fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children and that it poses risks to pregnant mothers.
February 2, 2024 – Food & Water Watch, Fluoride Action Network, Moms Against Fluoride and other advocacy groups and individuals are suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in a bid to force the agency to prohibit water fluoridation in the U.S. due to fluoride’s toxic effects on children’s developing brains.
The agency maintains that the 0.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L) recommended level at which fluoride, an industrial waste byproduct, is added to community water supplies is safe
However, in their testimonies, Dr. Bruce Lanphear, professor of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University, and Phillipe Grandjean, M.D., Ph.D., adjunct professor in environmental health at Harvard and chair of environmental medicine at the University of Southern Denmark, outlined the findings of a large body of evidence they said contradicts the EPA’s claims about safety.
Both men are experts on environmental toxins, including fluoride and lead, and have acted as advisors to the EPA and other international organizations on setting hazard levels for major environmental toxins.
Fluoride, maternal hypothyroidism and fetal health
During the first day of testimony the plaintiffs’ first expert witness provided an overview of research on the neurotoxic studies of fluoride for the developing brain from the Mexican ELEMENT, the Canadian MIREC and the Danish Odense cohort studies — where researchers collect epidemiological data during pregnancy and then from children over their lifetimes to study a variety of health outcomes tied to environmental exposures.
Kids in New Jersey Schools Can Win Cash Prizes by Shilling for Vaccine Makers By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
The New Jersey Department of Health’s “Protect Me With 3+” contest encourages kids and teens to create posters and videos — using health department talking points — to promote vaccines. Critics called out the contest for using kids to “propagandize other children.”
02/02/24 – New Jersey schoolchildren can enter a contest to win cash prizes by creating posters and videos that promote vaccines.
The “Protect Me With 3+” campaign for “educating New Jersey communities” about the “benefits” of vaccines is sponsored by the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) and the Partnership for Maternal & Child Health of Northern New Jersey.
The campaign, open to children and teens in grades 5-12, requires students to create a poster or 30-second video to “raise awareness of the importance of vaccination against one of the following vaccine-preventable diseases: Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis (Tdap), Meningococcal ACWY (MenACWY), Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Flu, or COVID-19,” according to the contest’s guidelines.
“By getting vaccinated, you are protecting yourself and your family and friends,” the contest materials state. “Not vaccinating a child on time can make someone else sick, like a friend, baby, adult, grandparent, or someone unable to be vaccinated.”
Contest participants can win a $50-$175 gift card. Three teachers whose classes submit the most entries will be awarded $75 each.
An accompanying contest by the NJDOH targeting university students asks them to create content promoting vaccines with the phrase “Step Up! Vax Up!” and offers a top prize of $5,000 to the winning entry.
Some medical and legal experts said they had ethical concerns about having children participate in a contest to promote pharmaceutical products.
“This type of insidious manipulation of children for Pharma profit is cruel and inhumane,” said Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) senior director of science and research.
Former Pharma insider tells Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to BUY OFF the news media. [2:37] The Vigilant Fox @VigilantFox
Holy smokes. Suspicions confirmed.
8:19 PM · Feb 2, 2024 – 2.3M Views – This is described as an “open secret” within the pharmaceutical industry.
TUCKER: You’re saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business?
CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma.
TUCKER: I never thought of that.
CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. This is an open secret. The kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks, the points of that is not — it’s largely to impact the customer. But the pharma has already got that. They’ve already bought off the doctors. They’re good on that.
No, this is an open secret. The news ad spending from pharma is a public relations lobbying tactic, essentially to buy off the news. They’re not investigating pharma. The news has become basically a referee. That you are a terrible anti-science luddite for asking why the shots that we require our kids to get, that fundamentally by their own advertising change the immune system of that child for life…
To even ask that question, the news referees that and calls you anti-science. When the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally criminal enterprises, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, in the past five years, have settled two of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history for bribing doctors and creating misleading research for the two largest vaccine makers. So you literally have the media playing referee that you can’t even ask a question.
TUCKER: If you have a vaccine injury and many people have, including some I know very well, even a profound vaccine injury, you’re not allowed to complain about it.
CALLEY MEANS: No, you’re “anti-science.”
TUCKER: Even if it can be shown to us that this is a vaccine injury?
CALLEY MEANS: The media plays referee because they’re funded by so, on all levels.
TUCKER: This is very dark, Calley Means.
This is what happens to you if you perform a study showing the unvaccinated are much MUCH healthier than the vaccinated. [6:38] Jessica Rojas @catsscareme2021
February 2, 2024
[Ed.:
