COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery |
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]
Hospital Pays Job Applicant Who Refused Mandated Flu Shot by Bob Unruh
Corporation cited for illegal religious discrimination
Mar. 10, 2024 8:15 am – A hospital in Grand Rapids, Mich., has agreed to pay a settlement to a job applicant who had been offered a position, but then was arbitrarily rejected because he declined to take a flu shot hospital officials demanded.
News of the settlement comes from Liberty Counsel.
The fight involved Trinity Health Grand Rapids, which previously was known as Mercy Health St. Mary’s. The resolution includes a consent decree that allows paying of some $50,000 to the worker who was rejected.
The case originally was filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and charged the hospital improperly denied a job applicant’s request for a religious exemption to the flu shot.
The requirement for such shots later was dropped by the hospital, which agreed to train leaders on religious rights in addition to paying the settlement.
“According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, even though the hospital’s former flu shot policy allowed for a religious exemption, the hospital determined the applicant’s articulated religious beliefs were ‘insufficient’ to grant the exemption and denied it without an explanation. Trinity Health, which had made a conditional job offer to the applicant, then rescinded that job offer and did not give the applicant an opportunity to address the concerns with his request.”
The EEOC accused the corporation of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The report explained federal law insists that employers make reasonable accommodations for religious employees – unless those accommodations create an “undue hardship” on the company.
Adverse Effects: A Critical Review of COVID Vaxgenes: Do You Choose to Understand? [55:23] PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD
New Book for mRNA Vaccinated, Family, and Friends
MAR 10, 2024 – Many have said the new mRNA vaccines are not really vaccines which traditionally have fallen into three categories: 1) antigen, 2) killed virus 3) live attenuated. Over the course of the pandemic the definition of vaccine has been softened to simply state a mechanism without a hard clinical benefit or outcome.
What does it mean to have mRNA injected into the human body? We sought to answer these questions by inviting on the show this week Dr. Karina A. Acevedo-Whitehouse who told us why she was motivated to write a powerful and revealing book on mRNA titled: Adverse effects. A critical review of COVID vaxgenes: Do you choose to understand? For so many who now have this new form of synthetic mRNA in their bodies, this book is a must. Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse currently works at the Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Autonomous University of Queretaro. Acevedo-Whitehouse does research on Immune Plasticity, Molecular Epidemiology of disease in wildlife, and Cancer in free-ranging species.
NO TITLE by Jessica Rojas @catsscareme2021, Shared by ~Dr. Christiane Northrup, MD
“For the record and for those of you who haven’t been around as long as I have, here goes…
“For my entire career as a physician, I have attempted to educate my patients and my community about issues that were not mainstream at all at the time. Examples: routine circumcision, over diagnosis of DCIS from mammograms, the need for DHA fats for brain health in infants that is in breast milk and was not in baby formula until the last few decades, the need to supplement with folic acid in pregnancy to prevent neural tube defects, the fact that HPV is cleared naturally by the body 90% of the time, the role of optimal levels of vitamin D, and the fact that hormones not native to the female body (like Provera) have untoward effects that can be dangerous and that there are far safer alternatives for menopausal relief.
“My position on vaccines hasn’t changed in 40 years. I advocate optimal immunity and all the ways we can improve it, not by ever increasing numbers of vaccines (now up to 72 by age 18 according to the CDC schedule). Congress excused vaccine manufacturers from all liability back in 1986. No other industry has ever had this unquestioned support to do whatever they want without adequate testing or oversight. The CDC recommended number of vaccines has tripled since then. And the CDC is paid millions by vaccine manufacturers to promote them. It is NOT an unbiased organization at all. Most people don’t know this. And since then, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) (VAERS) has paid out over $4 billion dollars to families of vaccine-injured children. This organization reports that only about 1 % of vaccine injuries are EVER reported. Why are we so quick to dismiss the suffering of those who have been harmed by vaccines? And vilify those of us who question their safety … especially at the current rate?
“Read the package inserts on vaccine ingredients and the potential adverse effects. It is all right there in plain sight. And none have ever been studied in combination or cumulatively. Yet infants are being given 5-11 at one time! My home state of Maine, like so many others, is about to hear a bill making many vaccines mandatory for school, day care, etc. Yet there hasn’t been a single case of measles reported here (except one Canadian visitor) in 17 years.This narrative—that we’re all about to die from a major epidemic—is being drive by fear and also huge amounts of money being paid to push the Pharma agenda. And for the record, China has a 99% vaccination rate. Yet they, like the United States , have pockets of measles outbreaks. 26,000 cases reported in one study.
“Why? Because no vaccine is 100% effective. Lifetime immunity from getting a disease is entirely different. You are protected for life. When it comes to measles, mumps, etc, evidence shows that vaccines don’t give you lifetime immunity. I believe this is connected to the fact that more than 50% of children in the US now have a chronic disease. All these vaccines have messed up our natural immunity. And studies have verified…
“Back in the late 80s and early 90s, women were banned from some doctors’ practices if they refused to take conventional hormone replacement. The belief that hormones were the key to heart disease prevention was so strong that doctors pushed it on everyone. (And the Pharma position was huge then too). If you questioned the narrative, you were shamed. The huge women’s health initiative changed all that, however, when a well designed study FINALLY showed that when Premarin and Provera were used for hormone replacement, the risks outweighed the benefits. We need these same kinds of studies with individual vaccines. They are not likely to be done given the current political and medical climate. But simply pointing this truth out is now increasingly being censored.” ~Dr. Christiane Northrup, MD
