Daily Shmutz | COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery |   3/26/24

COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery 

[Ed.:  FEAR YOUR DOCTOR!  Medicine is a disgraced profession.  They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia.  Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]

 

Peter Sweden: New mRNA Side Effect: “Safe and Effective” was a LIE   By Peter Sweden

Mar. 26, 2024 10:15 am – The Danish Medicines Agency has warned that chronic hives is a possible side effect of the Moderna mRNA injection.

Remember how we were bombarded by the media and “the experts” that the brand new mRNA shots were completely SAFE and EFFECTIVE?

That was a phrase that we heard repeated over and over again.

But some people were skeptical and warned that there could be side effects. They were quickly branded by the media as “crazy conspiracy theorists”.

Turns out that they were right after all…

Now the Danish Medicines Agency has come out saying that chronic hives is a possible side effect of the Moderna Spikevax vaccine, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is in agreement with the Danish findings.

The study found that people were most likely to get chronic hives 7-13 days after receiving their 3rd dose of Moderna vaccine.

It was found that people who got the injection had a 3 times higher risk of developing chronic hives than the rest of the population. They also say that especially young men are more likely to get this side effect.

What is interesting is that the Danish warned all the way back in 2021 that they found a signal that chronic hives could be a result of the Moderna vaccine, but there wasn’t enough data to confirm.

In Norway, they actually recommended against the Moderna vaccine for men under the age of 30 because of the risk of myocarditis. Did you hear anything about that on the news?

So it is now official.

The Moderna vaccine was not safe.

The media and the experts were wrong once again.

[Ed.:

   

 

My talk to the National Health Federation  [1:16:20]  MERYL NASS

A 16 minute quickie on the WHO and global agenda

MAR 25, 2024

https://rumble.com/v4kp2uz-march-24-warnings-on-pesticide-tips-bad-treatments-droz-and-who-tyranny-mer.html

My formal presentation can be found between minutes 20-36, and after that is a long Q and A. John Droz, a physicist who has been producing masterful content on many aspects of the plandemic in regular, free publications, presented before I did.  [Emphasis added]

https://substack.com/profile/4682211-john-droz-jr

 

FDA Ivermectin Settlement – Follow-Up     PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA

A response to some readers disappointment with the settlement plus details of another interesting aspect of the case that I did not include in my original post.

MAR 23, 2024 – Yesterday I posted an overview of the FDA’s (and other agencies) coordinated actions which led to the lawsuit against the FDA. Ultimately, the FDA decided to settle with “us” out of court (at their request mind you, not ours).

Many of my subscribers then commented on the post with some celebrating the impact of the victory (which was in rightly exposing the FDA to the wider public for what they are – a highly corrupted organization). Others bemoaned the fact that the plaintiffs had decided to settle and that we had missed an opportunity for discovery which would have been a “real win.”

I do share the same sentiments as those disappointed with the settlement. However, the reality is that the Boyden Gray law firm is expert at suing federal agencies. Based on their extensive experience, it was their legal advice that the settlement was the absolute best we could have hoped for.

First, they felt the case would have likely gone on for months or years and second, although discovery was a valid goal in trying to uncover and identify all the corrupt individuals and actions involved “behind the scenes,” it would have not achieved that.

Why? Because apparently, when you go to discovery with these agencies, you get very little out of them. Paul Marik told me that the lead lawyer at Boyden Gray said that the FDA would simply claim that the important communications that we would be interested in obtaining all occurred… on the telephone. So no record could be provided. Bastards.

To provide further evidence of this, I will share the text conversations I had today with my amazing friends and colleagues, Senator Ron Johnson and Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (the lead plaintiff in the case).

Without further ado, lets start with Senator Johnson who sent me my post and congratulated me on it:

Total Page Visits: 255 - Today Page Visits: 2
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.