COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’!]

The World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty Ignores Covid Policy Mistakes By Kevin Bardosh & Jay Bhattarcharya

Apr. 30, 2024 7:00 pm – The World Health Organization is urging the U.S. and 193 other governments to commit next month to a new global treaty to prevent and manage future pandemics. Current estimates suggest over $31 billion per year will be needed to fund its obligations, a cost most lower income countries cannot afford. But that isn’t the only reason to oppose it. Validating this treaty is a vote for the disastrous policies of the Covid years. Rather than taking time for deep reflection and serious reform, those pushing the pandemic treaty are set on ignoring and institutionalizing the WHO’s mistakes.

From the Spring of 2020, many experts warned that the panic begun in Wuhan’s unprecedented lockdown would cause wide-ranging damage—and indeed they did. School closures deprived a generation of children—especially poor children—of access to basic education. Businesses were shuttered. Vaccine and mask mandates made public health an authoritarian exercise of power devoid of science. Border quarantines promulgated the idea that the rest of the world is unclean.

But few experts care to seriously dissect these errors. How many schools of public health—in America or Europe—held serious debates during the Covid response, or since? Very few.

Opposing the treaty is a signal to the WHO and global health community that they cannot whitewash these mistakes. Next time, we need to ensure a better balance between trade-offs, evidence-based policies, and democratic rights. Such a view seeks to restore the WHO’s own definition of health into pandemic response: “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

Yet the governing philosophy of the WHO emergency program is the exact opposite. Its leaders chastise the world to “move faster’ and “do more.” Bill Gates, the agency’s single largest private donor, is convinced lockdown benefits vastly outweighed their harms. He’s wrong.

Read through the current draft of the treaty itself and you will find a whole section dedicated to “fighting misinformation.” There is no section focused on preventing harm. Those speaking out about these dangers have been subjected to harsh censorship. Once esteemed professionals were summarily fired for describing the reality of what was happening. The authors of the anti-lockdown Great Barrington Declaration—professors at Stanford, Harvard, and Oxford—were subject to a “devastating takedown” at the hands of Dr. Fauci and top scientific bureaucrats at the National Institutes of Health and the WHO.

What Will Happen to America if mRNA Continues Unchecked? KAREN KINGSTON

“From Tuskegee to the military –history has taught us that government must be reined in lest it treat its citizenry as rats in a cage or guinea pigs for experimentation.” – Attorney Robert Barnes

APR 30, 2024 – April 30, 2024: Millions of Americans have suffered injuries, diseases, and death from the COVID-19 injections, and yet no one in the US government is doing anything to stop the criminal use of mRNA gene editing technologies on innocent adults and children. Even the 5th and 9th circuit courts are turning their backs on the U.S. Constitution and human rights, including children’s right to life.

In Children Health’s Defense writ of certiorari petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, attorney Robert Barnes recounts, “Reeling from the moral horror of the Nazi regime, and its enthusiastic embrace of eugenics, American jurists led the way in reestablishing the Constitutional order by invalidating eugenics-era precedents and by instituting the Nuremberg Code of 1947. The right to bodily autonomy has guided the standards governing all matters of medical care concerning the state. The Nuremberg Code-derived governance of medical authority in the U.S. and elsewhere reversed the eugenics- era precedents, empowered individuals with a meaningful participatory role in their own medical care, and empowered democratic oversight, judicial supervision, and procedural safeguards on the medical regulatory process. It enshrined informed consent as the ethical foundation of modern medicine and a fundamental human liberty so universal that courts acknowledge it as a peremptory norm.

Concern over uninformed, nonconsensual, and pharmacological failures haunts the history of rushed drugs, biologics and negligent courts. From Tuskegee to the military, from the foster homes of young women to Indian health care services on reservations, from facilities for the mentally ill to jails for women, the least powerful and most trusting have been horrendously victimized by government medical experimentation, without recourse or remedy. Deceptive denial of syphilis treatment, forced sterilizations, testing of radioactive ingredients on unwitting patients, psychological experimentation on unsuspecting students (such as the MK-Ultra type testing on Ted Kaczynski at Harvard), the LSD testing on government employees, the chemical testing over San Francisco or in New York City subways, the mustard gas secret tests on drafted soldiers–history has taught us that government must be reined in lest it treat its citizenry as rats in a cage or guinea pigs for experimentation.

“These examples pale in comparison to the mass experimentation that the FDA is currently facilitating on infants, toddlers, and young children globally with an experimental mRNA vaccine.” – Attorney Robert Barnes

Using mRNA to Control the Genetics of the Population

Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population. Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior.

Per the NIH, “The most well-known application of eugenics occurred in Nazi Germany in the lead up to World War II and the Holocaust. The Nazi German racial state between 1933 and 1945 used its resources to “cleanse” the German people and the Nazi state of those they deemed “unworthy of life.”

The WHO, FDA, U.S. Government, and China Have Acted with Unrestrained Power and Engaged in Unlawful Acts Violating Human Rights

China has strategically partnered with U.S. and international regulatory agencies and US BioPharma companies to manipulate the masses and their governments, to not only accept the use of mRNA gene editing bioweapons on healthy adults and children, but to demand they be praised and accepted. Per a 2020 Congressional Report, “the Chinese government is shaping and subverting the international governance system to align with Beijing’s own principles, which are directly opposed to universal values and individual rights.Beijing uses economic leverage to secure other countries’ support for these alternative values in the UN and other organizations (i.e. the WHO) while exploiting leadership roles in UN agencies (i.e. the WHO) to promote Chinese foreign policy objectives.”

Wayne Allyn Root with #1 Story in America: Wayne Explains How Trump was Right About Everything – Again. Democrats Have Used Open Borders to Turn America into a Third World Craphole – Gaza. [48:03 – Covid starts at 32:29]

Apr. 29, 2024 2:20 pm – Wayne Allyn Root with #1 Story in America: Wayne explains how Trump was right about everything – again. Democrats have used open borders to turn America into a third-world craphole – Gaza.

Watch Wayne’s “America’s Top Ten Countdown” with his World-Famous “Final Four” airing Fridays at 10 PM ET and Saturdays at Noon ET on Real America’s Voice TV Network.

VIDEO:

Instead of the Pandemic Treaty, the draft Pandemic Resolution is being floated as a way of moving past impasses MERYL NASS

And always, the goal is to get a document that includes the most important goals implemented in great haste: 1) the biowarfare agent collection/sharing and 2) One Health

APR 29, 2024

Dated April 16, we have instead of a Pandemic Agreement an 8 page Resolution that nations are to sign promising they will move forward with a pandemic agreement. You can read it all at this website. I will include the parts of most interest to me below, with my comments in brackets.

https://www.keionline.org/wp-content/uploads/INB-WHA-resolution-771-draft-16.04.pdf

… Considering the need for an additional Main Committee of the Health Assembly to deal predominantly with health emergency-related matters, and thereby promote coherence and complementarity in the implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement, the International Health Regulations (2005), and other work of WHO on health emergencies; [What do coherence and complementarity mean here?]

Emphasizing the need for expeditious entry into force and effective implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement…

CALLS UPON all States and regional economic integration organizations entitled to do so, to consider signing, ratifying, accepting, approving, formally confirming or acceding to the Agreement at the earliest opportunity, with a view to bringing the Agreement into force as soon as possible; [Presumably the WHO, US, globalists are pressuring EU nations to back off and let the EU as a whole sign up for 27 individual nations, even though there are significant reasons to think the EU has no right to do so]…

FURTHER URGES all Member States, regional economic integration organizations, international organizations and other interested parties to support the preparatory activities referred to in this resolution, and to effectively encourage prompt entry into force and implementation of the Agreement;

“Lancet Study Finds Covid-19 Viral Proteins in Blood of 25% of People Post-Covid” Or Rather Post-Jab? ANDREAS OEHLER

A new lying Lancet study, peer reviewed, no doubt…

APR 29, 2024 – The most recent headline says “Covid-19 Found in People’s Blood Months After Infection” (Psychology Today, 2024.04.26):

In order to prove that their findings were not a false positive signal, the team ran the same test on 250 samples collected from a mix of people in 2012-2019. The team was able to show that people who had had Covid showed specific proteins in the blood that the pre-pandemic samples did not have.

Less than 2 percent of the pre-pandemic blood samples came up positive, as compared to 25 percent of the blood samples from 171 people who’d had Covid [OR WAS IT A JAB – SEE BELOW]. The team also accounted for vaccination [SURE THEY DID – IN WAYS THAT WILL SURPRISE YOU] and possible reinfections in their post-pandemic samples, and still found evidence of persistent viral proteins [WHICH THEY WERE ON A MISSION TO FIND]. This means the false positive signal was very low [AND THE AMOUNT OF DECEPTIONS AND LIES IS VERY HIGH].

The Lancet study itself, “Plasma-based antigen persistence in the post-acute phase of COVID-19” (2024.04.08), wants us to be left with the same conclusion:

Persistent symptoms among some individuals who develop COVID-19 have led to the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 might, in some form or location, persist for long periods following acute infection.1, 2 Studies on SARS-CoV-2 persistence to date, however, have been limited by small and non-representative study populations, short durations since acute infection, unclear documentation of vaccination and reinfection histories, and the absence of a true negative comparator group to assess assay specificity (appendix p 2). To address these limitations, we evaluated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antigens in once-thawed plasma from a well characterised group of 171 adults (appendix pp 3, 9) at several timepoints in the 14 months following RNA-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, most of whom were studied before vaccination or reinfection (so-called pandemic-era participants)

“The team also accounted for vaccination”? How “most” was the most studied before vaccination?

The State of Freedom. Bioweapons and Treaties. A 2-part interview MERYL NASS

APR 28, 2024

https://sites.libsyn.com/469716

#160 Bioweapons & Treaties w/ Dr. Meryl Nass (Part 1)

Apr 25, 2024

Chris and Danielle dive deep into the story behind the pandemic with Dr. Meryl Nass in this first of a two-episode special! What was her own experience with COVID, and what are the bigger implications?

SCRIPTURE OF THE DAY:

Psalms 27:1-4 TPT

ACTION ITEMS & WAYS TO CONNECT:

To keep up with Dr. Meryl Nass, you can:
- Visit her organization’s website:

https://doortofreedom.org/

Subscribe to her Substack: merylnass.substack.com

KEY POINTS:

Danielle reminds everyone of their faith with today’s scripture (03:14)
The State of Freedom welcomes Dr. Meryl Nass (05:28)
Her COVID story (09:30)
A question with no definite answer (12:17)
How she learned about her treatment protocol (15:59)
Issues in Maine (21:39)
The bigger legal picture (26:19)
What a vaccine is (30:40)
Regulatory capture (35:00)
Her thoughts on recent legislative developments (39:34)
State of Freedom’s closing message for its listeners (41:43)

CREDITS:

Music by MarkJuly from Pixaby

Sound effects by Pixaby

Produced by Podcasting Pros

#161 Bioweapons & Treaties w/ Dr. Meryl Nass (Part 2)

Apr 26, 2024

Chris and Danielle continue their conversation with Dr. Meryl Nass in the second of a two-episode special! As they touch on the bigger picture revealed by the pandemic, how urgently is action needed to avert tyranny this election year?

SCRIPTURE OF THE DAY:

Psalms 119:1-8 TPT

KEY POINTS:

Danielle shares the simple truth in today’s scripture (03:10)
The State of Freedom continues the conversation with Dr. Meryl Nass (06:30)
Emergence of treaties into laws (09:35)
Who’s resisting (12:59)
How treaties are actually ratified (15:59)
Alabama, Tennessee and Maine (19:13)
What can ordinary people do (20:22)
Trouble for Congress (23:44)
Big untruths (26:20)
10th Amendment arguments (28:56)
Crossing out human rights (32:40)
How people can follow Dr. Nass (39:16)
State of Freedom’s closing message for its listeners (42:45)

Bird Flu, Censorship & 100 Day Vaccines: 7 Predictions for “The Next Pandemic” MERYL NASS

Kit Knightly in the Off Guardian predicts how the “next” pandemic will be handled

APR 28, 2024

https://off-guardian.org/2024/04/19/bird-flu-censorship-100-day-vaccines-7-predictions-for-the-next-pandemic/

Earlier this month the White House published its new “Pandemic Preparedness” targets.

They are far from alone in covering this. Back in March, Sky News was asking: “Next pandemic is around the corner,’ expert warns – but would lockdown ever happen again?”

On April 3rd, the Financial Times asked something similar: “The next pandemic is coming. Will we be ready?”

Less than an hour ago, the Daily Mail invited us inside “the world’s deadliest cave that could cause the next pandemic”.

Just two days ago a professional panic spreader wrote for CNN:

The next pandemic threat demands action now!!!

OK, I added the exclamation points, but they are very much implied in the original text.

So, while Iran and Israel rattle their sabres on the front pages, I thought we should take a look at the quieter back pages to see what we can learn, and help us predict how “the next pandemic” will unfold.

What is “the next pandemic”?

I mean…I feel like that’s fairly self-explanatory.

Seriously though, it’s the one they’ve been predicting from pretty much the moment Covid started. First it was going to be monkey pox – sorry MPox – but that fizzled.

Of course by “pandemic”, we really mean “psy-op”, because nothing about the next pandemic will be any more real than the last pandemic. Hell, given the leaps forward in AI technology, it could be considerably less real next time.

Bird Flu Outbreaks & the WHO/IHR Pandemic Treaty Push MERYL NASS

NOTE: 0.5% of subjects who received the Audenz bird flu vaccine died during the clinical trial, while only 0.1% of subjects in the placebo group died. DON’T TAKE ANY BIRD FLU VACCINES!!!–NASS

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2024/04/bird-flu-outbreaks-the-who-ihr-pandemic-treaty-push-2/

by Barbara Loe Fisher Published April 22, 2024

Even as U.S. health agencies and the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) are being heavily criticized for their botched response to the COVID-19 pandemic,¹ ² ³ WHO officials are ramping up pressure on all nations to sign a WHO pandemic treaty and amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR), which will give them more authority to track, quarantine, force vaccine use and censor free speech during WHO declared pandemics.⁴ ⁵ The WHO’s Director General has been blaming opposition to the UN agency’s epic power grab on “a torrent of fake news, lies and conspiracy theories.”⁶

On Apr. 19, 2024, the United Nations sent out a press release declaring that the “ongoing global spread of ‘bird flu’ infections to mammals including humans is a significant public health concern,” pointing to an outbreak of H5N1 viral infections in dairy cows in the U.S. and warning that the virus could evolve and cause human-to-human transmission with “extremely high” mortality.⁷ The implication was that a potentially deadly global bird flu pandemic was a clear possibility.

The CDC website describes symptoms of H5N1 bird flu infections, and they sound very similar to seasonal influenza or SARS-CoV-2 infections associated with COVID-19 disease:

“The reported signs and symptoms of bird flu virus infections in humans have ranged from no symptoms or mild illness [such as eye redness (conjunctivitis) or mild flu-like upper respiratory symptoms], to severe (such as pneumonia requiring hospitalization) and included fever (temperature of 100ºF [37.8ºC] or greater) or feeling feverish*, cough, sore throat, runny or stuff nose, muscle or body aches, headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. Less common signs and symptoms include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or seizures.”⁸^{[These signs and symptoms are an old list, before the virus mutated to be much less harmful, and are currently irrelevant—Nass]}

Warnings That Egg and Milk Supplies May Be Contaminated with Bird Flu Virus

Mainstream media have been joining the UN in characterizing bird flu outbreaks in cattle as a significant public health concern, with news outlets breathlessly reporting that cattle were infecting each other with H5N1 and some experts questioning whether raw or even pasteurized milk containing high levels of the avian virus is safe.⁹ Although H5N1 bird flu was first detected in 1996, since 2020 there have been more outbreaks in poultry farms, wild bird and land and marine animals.¹⁰ ¹¹ Americans were warned in early April that the eggs from chickens potentially infected with the avian virus should be well cooked,¹² and then the media reported that a U.S. dairy farm worker in Texas had been infected with bird flu.¹³^{[This was the case of pink eye that has now recovered—Nass]}

The same day the UN issued their press release, Agence France Presse again reminded readers that a person working on a dairy farm in Texas was recovering from bird flu. A WHO official was quoted as stating that, “The case in Texas is the first case of a human infected by an avian influenza by a cow.”¹⁴

BOMBSHELL: AstraZeneca ADMITTED side effect of covid vaccine PETER IMANUELSEN

Massive news as the pharmaceutical giant has admitted in court that their covid vaccine can cause rare blood clotting side effect.

APR 29, 2024 – This is absolutely huge news.

AstraZeneca has just admitted IN COURT that their covid injection can indeed cause a deadly side effect that causes blood clots.

They are currently being sued in a class action lawsuit from victims that have suffered after being lied to by the “experts” about “safe and effective”, with lawyers saying that the AstraZeneca vaccine is DEFECTIVE.

It is in this lawsuit that AstraZeneca admitted that their covid vaccine “can, in very rare cases, cause TTS”.

There we have it – The TRUTH is FINALLY beginning to come out after all these years!

What is TTS?

It is short for Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, but it is also known as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).

Those are very long and fancy words, but essentially what it means is that a person gets BOTH blood clots and low blood platelet counts.

Meaning that people can get both blood clots AND internal bleeding at the same time.

The consequences.

This admission from the vaccine maker means that victims could get a massive legal payout. The first lawsuit was started by Jamie Scott, a father of two who was left with a permanent brain injury after getting the AstraZeneca injection.

“We need an apology, fair compensation for our family and other families who have been affected. We have the truth on our side, and we are not going to give up” said Kate Scott, the wife of the victim.

In total, 51 cases have now been lodged in Britain and victims and relatives are seeking damages worth £100 million.

Cross-Country Running Teen Who Had Unexplained Heart Attack in 2022 Has Died Suddenly Before Graduation JD RUCKER

Corporate media’s standing orders are to report that they don’t know the cause of death but it definitely wasn’t the jabs. [Right. Emphasis added]

APR 29, 2024 – This isn’t the first and, sadly, it won’t be the last report of a young and otherwise healthy teen dying inexplicably. High school senior Gabriel Higginbottom’s death was a bit different from other similar stories because his unexplained heart attack happened two years ago; unlike so many, he was able to live beyond his sudden ailment.

As is always the case, we do not know if Higginbottom was injected with Covid-19 “vaccines” or boosters, nor do we know for certain if they contributed to his heart attack and subsequent death. All we know for sure is that the frequency of unexplained heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, and other cardiac challenges his skyrocketed in teens since the rollout of the jabs.

WREG reports the sad story of Higginbottom’s passing:

COVID-19 Vaccines – The Devastating Health Crisis in the UK Channel Islands and Around the World PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

April 26 2024 Report from Medical Experts, UK MP Andrew Brigden, and US Senator Ron Johnson [1:32:19]

APR 29, 2024 – Please enjoy and share this 96 minute seminar style presentation on the COVID-19 vaccine debacle organized by the Channel Islands and UK Alliance. Presentations from experts in general medicine, cardiology, and oncology are informative and alarming.

All of the experts agree that COVID-19 vaccines should be pulled off the market and mRNA biotechnology should be halted. The panel concluded the rise in all cause mortality around the globe since 2021 is attributable to vaccine deaths. Additionally, there may be 5 to 15 years of continued concern for evolving vaccine injury syndromes after the last injection.

Doctors Predict Epidemic of Prion Brain Diseases Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

April 29. 2024

A Shocking, New COVID Jab Side Effect?

It sounds like something out of a horror film, but according to these doctors, we’re already seeing signs that it is happening – and an epidemic may be ahead. All mRNA jab recipients are at risk, and they may be shedding infectious prions, which can be transmitted to others and trigger dementia. [Emphasis added]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Mounting research suggests a serious side effect of the COVID mRNA jabs could be dementia, and the prions that cause it may be contagious
Frameshifting, as we now know occurs in the COVID shots, can induce prion production and lead to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)
Sid Belzberg’s prions.rip website, which collected data on neurological side effects post-jab, found a notably high incidence of diagnosed CJD cases, suggesting an alarming trend
A series of articles highlight biases in clinical trials and observational studies, suggesting COVID-19 vaccines’ safety and effectiveness have been massively overstated
The Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project study — funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — reveals significant side effects, including myocarditis, pericarditis, and blood clots, underscoring the need for reevaluation of COVID vaccine risks and benefits

[Ed.: Well THAT’s an ironic twist of fate! Remember how they were accusing the unvaccinated of irresponsibly putting others at risk?]

States Move to Reject WHO Treaty, Federal Health Diktats MERYL NASS

‘Nullification is not revolt, all it is is ignoring: We’re taking a position that we are going to ignore this edict,’ said Tennessee state Rep. Bud Hulsey.

APR 28, 2024

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/states-move-to-reject-who-treaty-federal-health-diktats-5635764

By Kevin Stocklin

4/25/2024

At a time when governments and global organizations are seeking additional powers to deal with pandemics or other catastrophes, a burgeoning effort is rising in opposition to defend local autonomy and personal liberties.

Next month, member nations of the World Health Organization (WHO) are gathering to grant the agency vast new powers during “health emergencies.”

Meanwhile, some state lawmakers are attempting to wrest back control of health issues to their states and their citizens. And although their success has been mixed, they say they’re in it for the long haul.

“We’re almost to a place in this country that the federal government has trampled on the sovereignty of states for so long that in peoples’ minds, they have no options,” Tennessee state Rep. Bud Hulsey told The Epoch Times.

“It’s like whatever the federal government says is the supreme law of the land, and it’s not,” he said. “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”

A series of Supreme Court decisions, perhaps most notably the 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, have given ever-increasing power and autonomy to federal agencies to make laws, despite lawmaking authority being vested in Congress and state legislatures.

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, April 16-April 22, 2024 MARK CRISPIN MILLER

APR 24, 2024 – Athletes in US (4), UK (2), Colombia, Brazil (5), Argentina, Germany (2), Switzerland, Bosnia, Romania, Portugal, Spain (5), Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Turkey, Australia; coaches in US & UK; and more

2015 Scientific Paper Proves US & Chinese Scientists Collaborated to Create Coronavirus that Can Infect Humans [14:22] by Peter R. Breggin, MD

April 15, 2020 – In 2015 – American researchers and Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers collaborated to transform an animal coronavirus into one that can attack humans. Scientists from prestigious American universities and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) worked directly with the two coauthor researchers from Wuhan Institute of Virology, Xing-Yi Ge and Zhengli-Li Shi. Funding was provided by the Chinese and US governments. The team succeeded in modifying a bat coronavirus to make it capable of infecting humans.

The research was published in December 2015 in the prestigious British journal, Nature Medicine (volume 21, pages1508–1513). The paper by Vineet D. Menachery et al., “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence” is available here as a PDF as well as on-line.

Footnotes to the scientific paper disclose that the research was funded by both the Chinese and US Governments, including grants from the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease.

Footnotes also document that the two Chinese researchers were active in their own laboratories as part of this coronavirus project.

At the bottom of the first page, the affiliation of both Chinese coauthors is listed as “Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.” The Chinese were being aided by the American government, American universities and American researchers in developing a potential military weapon with the capacity to cause a pandemic intentionally or accidentally.

Multiple prestigious American researchers and institutions were involved. One is from the FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research in Jefferson, Arkansas. The first author of the article, Vineet Menachery, is from the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Several other authors are from the University of North Carolina and one is from Harvard Medical School. There is also a Swiss researcher.

The researchers themselves note in the text of the article that the risks associated with the creation of their human pathogen were significant. They openly wondered if their research compromised U.S. federal standards for research on dangerous pathogens.

The potential dangers of the creation of new human coronavirus pathogens in the American/Chinese Menachery research were discussed in a commentary by Jef Akst in The Scientist on November 16, 2015. However, the danger of the Chinese collaboration went unmentioned.

Concluding Questions:

In 2015, US researchers in collaboration with Chinese researchers from the now-infamous Wuhan Institute jointly published a paper describing how they successfully modified a bat coronavirus to make it capable of infecting humans. Their project was funded by both the Chinese and the American governments.

Who in the US government enabled this research? Why was it allowed when it was enabling the Chinese to develop a military weapon or to accidentally cause an epidemic?
Why was an FDA official involved as an author and why was NIH funding the project?
The virus created in collaboration with the Chinese and the current epidemic virus are both SARS-CoV with many shared characteristics. This writer has found no scientific research that specifically compares the two viruses, a subject that needs to be investigated.
How many more lab-created or manipulated viruses are in the world’s laboratories and under the control of governments and the military?
Are potentially dangerous research projects continuing to go on involving American and Chinese collaboration with or without funding from both countries?
Why and how has this research project wholly escaped notice amid the growing concern about China’s role in causing the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic?
Why have none of the American researchers come forward to draw attention to this project which, at the least, enabled and promoted Chinese efforts to weaponize viruses?

Resources:

[Ed.: They “gained the function” of infecting humans. That’s conspiracy to commit mass murder, isn’t it! Fauci could be placed in his own experiment:

WHO: Intel Agency for Gates Foundation? JOHN LEAKE

Examining the Foundation’s prescient Aug. 2019 purchase of BioNTech stock.

APR 22, 2024 – Reviewing BioNTech’s Disclosure of Classes of Share Capital for the year ended December 31, 2019, I noticed the following:

On August 30, 2019, BioNTech entered into agreements with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). BMGF agreed to purchase 3,038,674 ordinary shares with nominal amount of k€ 3,039 of BioNTech for a total of k€49,864 (k$55,000). These agreements require BioNTech to perform certain research and development activities to advance the development of products for the prevention and treatment of HIV and tuberculosis. In the event of a breach of the underlying conditions, including such research and development activities, BMGF has the right to sell its shares back to BioNTech at the initial share price or fair market value, whichever is higher, subject to certain conditions. BioNTech’s ability to pay dividends is also limited under the terms of these agreements.

Less than two years after the Gates Foundation purchased the stock (pre-IPO) at $18 per share, it peaked on Aug. 6, 2021 at $389. At that price, the Foundation’s $55 million investment was worth $1,182,044,186.00 ($1.182 billion).

On September 18, 2019—just nineteen days after the Gates Foundation took its huge position in BioNTech stock— a report titled A World At Risk was published by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was founded in 2018 by the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization.

Barking Up the Wrong Tree [VIDEOS] JAMES ROGUSKI

Why have so many people chosen to ignore important information regarding the WHO negotiations? Old information is just as bad as mis-, dis- and mal-information.

APR 22, 2024 – Please watch the videos below:

Dermatology’s Disastrous War Against The Sun A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR

The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight

APR 21, 2024

Story at a Glance:
•Skin cancers are by far the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, so to prevent them, the public is constantly told to avoid the sun. However, while the relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight.

•This is unfortunate because sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body, as avoiding it doubles one’s rate of dying and significantly increases their risk of cancer.

•A strong case can be made that this dynamic was a result of the dermatology profession (with the help of a top PR firm) rebranding themselves to skin cancer fighters, something which allowed them to become one of the highest paying medical specialities in existence. Unfortunately, despite the billions that is put into fighting it each year, there has been no substantial change in the number of skin cancer deaths.

•In this article, we will also discuss the dangers of the conventional skin cancer treatments, the most effective ways for treating and preventing skin cancer, and some of the best strategies for having a healthy and nourishing relationship with the sun.

Note: in February’s open thread, I presented some potential articles, and since this topic was one of the most requested, I have spent the last month working on it.

Ever since I was a little child something seemed off about the fact everyone would get hysterical about how I needed to avoid sunlight and always wear sunscreen whenever we had an outdoor activity—so to the best of my ability I just didn’t comply. As I got older, I started to notice that beyond the sun feeling really good, anytime I was in the sun, the veins under my skin that were exposed to the sun would dilate, which I took as a sign the body craved sunlight and wanted it to draw into the circulation. Later still, I learned a pioneering researcher found significant alternations would occur in the health of people who wore glasses that blocked specific light spectrums (e.g., most glass blocks UV light) from entering the most transparent part of the body that could be treated by giving them specialized glasses which did not block that spectrum from entering.
Note: all the above touches upon one of my favorite therapeutic modalities—ultraviolet blood irradiation, which will be the focus of an upcoming article.

Later, when I became a medical student (at which point I was familiar with the myriad of benefits of sunlight), I was struck by how neurotic dermatologists were about avoiding sunlight—for instance, in addition to hearing every patient I saw there be lectured about the importance of avoiding sunlight, through my classmates, I learned of dermatologists in the northern latitudes (which had low enough sunlight people suffered from seasonal affective disorder) effectively require their students to wear sunscreen and clothing which covered most of their body while indoors. At this point my perspective on the issue changed to “this crusade against the sun is definitely coming from the dermatologists” and “what on earth is wrong with these people?” A few years ago I learned the final piece of the puzzle through Robert Yoho MD and his book Butchered by Healthcare.

The Monopolization of Medicine

Throughout my life, I’ve noticed three curious patterns in the medical industry:

•They will promote healthy activities people are unlikely to do (e.g., exercising or smoking cessation).
•They will promote clearly unhealthy activities industries make money from (e.g., eating processed foods or taking a myriad of unsafe and ineffective pharmaceuticals).
•They will attack clearly beneficial activities that are easy to do (e.g., sunlight exposure, eating eggs, consuming raw dairy, or eating butter).

As best as I can gather, much of this is rooted in the scandalous history of the American Medical Association, when in 1899, George H. Simmons, MD took possession of the floundering organization (MDs were going out of business because their treatments were barbaric and didn’t work). He, in turn, started a program to give the AMA seal of approval in return for the manufacturers disclosing their ingredients and agreeing to advertise in a lot of AMA publications (they were not however required to prove their product was safe or effective). This maneuver was successful, and in just ten years, increased their advertising revenues 5-fold, and their physician membership 9-fold.

[A MIDWESTERN EDITOR WHO IS SICK OF POSTING THIS TOPIC EVERY DAY FOR THE PAST 4 1/2 YEARS : Fire your doctor, and sue when warranted. They have sold out, and are no longer credible.] [Emphasis added]

Manufacturing MADNESS DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN

Documentary- A Gary Null Production

APR 22, 2024

Gary Null: Before any more lives are lost, it is time to take a deeper look at the manufacture of madness….

View the documentary here. [2:13:31]

Thank you, Gary Null, for your hard work in producing this documentary—Manufacturing MADNESS. And thank you to all those who have participated in highlighting the damages done for generations by psychiatry and calling for rational, humane and moral approaches to help and care for those afflicted with emotional distress and crisis.

Dr. Breggin and Gary Null have been working together for many decades. Gary was among the first journalists in the 1970’s to support Dr. Breggin’s successful anti-lobotomy campaign. The two of them have worked together ever since and Gary Null has hosted the Dr. Peter Breggin Hour on Gary’s Progressive Radio Network for several decades.

We also thank Patrick Hahn, for his participation in this documentary and his efforts to broadcast it more widely.

Resources

Medication Madness: The Roll of Psychiatric Drugs in Cases of Violence, Suicide and Crime by Peter Breggin, MD describes with detailed references how and why psychiatric drugs are so often dangerous to the patient being prescribed and to others.

For more information on better approaches to helping those in emotional crisis and about the history, marketing, and operation of psychiatry and the psychiatric drug industry see Toxic Psychiatry: Why Therapy, Empathy and Love Must Replace the Drugs, Electroshock, and Biochemical Theories of the “New Psychiatry” by Peter Breggin, M.D.

For details and data on how to more safely come off of psychiatric drugs see Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients, and Their Families by Peter Breggin MD.

FACT CHECK: CDC Lies [Again] About C-19 Vax/Injuries TOM RENZ

APR 21, 2024 – For those not aware, on April 11 the CDC released a report that alleges there is no link between COVID-19 vaccination and sudden cardiac death in young people. If that lie wasn’t made by a government agency with legal implications – I would laugh at it.

Unsurprisingly, the lamestream media has jumped all over it, frothing at the mouth – eager to spread this misinformation as some sort of ‘gotcha’ – directed at those who oppose these experimental gene therapy products.

In case you missed the CDC report, here’s a quick breakdown of it, as reported by ‘The Defender’ a publication of Children’s Health Defense.

“The study — published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) — came from Oregon public health authorities’ analysis of roughly 1,300 death certificates of Oregon residents ages 16-30 who died from a heart condition or unknown reasons between June 1, 2021, and Dec. 31, 2022.

Forty deaths occurred among people who received a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and only three occurred within 100 days after vaccination, the authors said.

The authors examined the death certificate data to determine what coroners listed as the cause(s) of death.

Of the three deaths that occurred within 100 days of COVID-19 vaccination, two were attributed to chronic underlying conditions. The cause of death for the third was undetermined, they said. Meanwhile, they said 30 deaths were attributed to COVID-19 infection.”

So, they cherry picked data from one state – just 1,300 people- and they limited the study period to 100 days post-injection. Experts like Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), claim that the CDC’s study was flawed and that its authors neglected to mention numerous earlier studies that linked the COVID-19 vaccination to cardiac issues. Critics of the report argue that the authors of the study failed to use appropriate search terms for finding possible cases of cardiac death related to COVID-19 vaccination.

As someone who has done an extensive amount of research on these mRNA gene therapy products – I’d like to ‘de bunk’ once and for all – the notion that ‘there is no evidence that Covid vaccines cause fatal cardiac arrest or other deadly heart problems in teens & young adults.’ Feel free to take issue with any source cited, I have three more sources to provide you with for any source you may dispute. The data is extensive and undeniable by those who are honest and objective.

Highly Pathogenic Avian H5N1 Influenza In Focus PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Dr. McCullough with Alison Steinberg on One America News

APR 21, 2024 – The media campaign for the decades-old problem of avian influenza H5N1 is perfectly timed about a month before the WHO’s ninth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB9). [Emphasis added] In March, government negotiators discussed all articles from the draft agreement, including adequate financing for pandemic preparedness, equitable access to medical countermeasures needed during pandemics and health workforce strengthening. Next month’s resumption of INB9 will be a critical milestone ahead of the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly, starting 27 May 2024, at which Member States are scheduled to consider the proposed text of the world’s first pandemic agreement for adoption.

Who are the eerily quiet, unelected US government staffers who are about to give away your medical, social, and economic freedoms in Geneva? Find out this and more as Dr. McCullough gives an update on the failure of poultry vaccination and culling to stop bird flu, mRNA myocarditis, and so much more on In Focus with Alison Steinberg on One America News.

Breast Cancer Surgeons Required to Submit DEI Statement to Work at UC Davis By Margaret Flavin

Apr. 20, 2024 3:40 pm – Which is more important to you when choosing a healthcare profession to help in the battle for your life? An extensive background in research and surgical experience? Or a statement of the surgeon’s contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)?

Apparently, for UC Davis, the answer is contributions to DEI.

Four years of medical school and a challenging residency focused on saving lives is simply not enough to become a surgeon at UC Davis.

According to a report at The College Fix, surgical oncologist applicants must also submit a “Statement of Contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” to be considered for employment.

According to the job listing, “Contributions to diversity, equity, and inclusion documented in the application file will be used to evaluate applicants.”

Further, the University policy requires all faculty applicants to “submit a statement about their past, present, and future contributions to promoting equity, inclusion, and diversity in their professional careers,” yet both a “Statement of Teaching” and a “Statement of Research” are listed as optional.

The College Fix reports:

A former associate dean at the University of Pennsylvania medical school criticized the requirement.

“The key to being a good surgical oncologist is having vast knowledge about how to treat cancer,” Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of Do No Harm, told The Fix via a media statement.

“That and a strong ethical sense should be the only requirements,” he said. “A surgical oncologist’s political ideas are irrelevant to his or her ability to treat patients.”

“There is no evidence that DEI adherence does anything to improve medical care,” he said. “There is a great deal of concern that adherence to DEI lead to divisiveness and mistrust on the part of patients.”

[Ed.:

Red Sox World Series Champion Dies Suddenly at 54 After ‘Cardiac Event’ By Cassandra Macdonald

Apr. 20, 2024 9:20 am – The statement continued, “Playing 3 seasons with the Red Sox, he will forever be a part of the curse-breaking 2004 World Series championship team. We send our love to his wife, Monica, and their children, Reid and Maxine.”

No additional details about his death were provided.

Total Page Visits: 253 - Today Page Visits: 1

KrakenNews.us

Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 4/30/24

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, April 16-April 22, 2024 MARK CRISPIN MILLER

About the author

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, April 16-April 22, 2024 MARK CRISPIN MILLER

About the author

Related Posts