Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!

Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?

If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal recourse is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org

How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]

DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]

GOOD NEWS: Health Secretary RFK Jr. to End COVID Vaccine Recommendations for Children, Teens, and Pregnant Women

Worldwide Embalmer Survey Reveals Striking Rise in White Fibrous Clots Following COVID-19 Vaccination [59:09] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

USAF Ret. Major Thomas Haviland’s global survey finds 83% of embalmers now report white fibrous clots—found in roughly 27.5% of bodies since mass COVID-19 vaccination began.

MAY 16, 2025

Retired U.S. Air Force Major Thomas Haviland joined epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher to present findings from two large-scale investigations into post-vaccine clotting abnormalities—one focused on the deceased, the other on the living.

The latest Worldwide Embalmer White Fibrous Clot Survey—a multi-year investigation documenting the sudden and widespread appearance of anomalous white fibrous clots in the deceased—draws from the testimony of embalmers around the globe who began observing these structures after the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA injections.

The companion People’s Blood Clot Survey gathers more than 1,400 self-reported and observed clotting cases from individuals across 40 countries, offering further insight into delayed clotting complications following vaccination.

2024 Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Survey

Respondents: 301 embalmers from multiple countries
Key Results:

83% (250 embalmers) reported seeing large, white, fibrous clots in corpses during 2024—up from 73% in 2023.
These clots were found in an average of 27.5% of all embalmed bodies, a rise from 20% in the previous year.
Embalmers stated they had never observed these clots before 2021, coinciding with the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.
78% also reported seeing signs of microclotting—described as “dirty blood” or “coffee grounds”—in about 22% of cases, compared to less than 5% before 2020.
Most embalmers acknowledged that their professional associations have never addressed this issue, despite high visibility in the field.

2024 People’s Blood Clot Survey

Respondents: 1,425 individuals from over 40 countries
Purpose: To gather self-reported or observed blood clotting events since 2020
Key Results:

1,294 individuals (91%) with clotting issues had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose.
Only 79 clotting cases were reported in 2020 (pre-vaccine), compared to over 500 per year in 2021–2024.
26% of clotting cases occurred six months to over a year after injection—supporting theories of delayed-onset clot development.
Most common clot locations: legs, lungs, brain, and heart—exactly matching CDC’s V-safe “free text” field analysis.
257 individuals required surgical removal of clots; 242 individuals died from clot-related complications.

Broader Implications & Suppression

Major Haviland submitted his survey findings each year to the FDA, CDC, and NIH—without any response.
Associations in the UK and other nations refused to participate despite having codes of ethics requiring investigation of unusual post-mortem findings.
Vascular surgeons and cath lab workers, though reportedly encountering similar clots in living patients, have remained silent—many citing fear of professional repercussions.

Composition of the Clots

Microscopic and Biochemical Analysis of Anomalous White Fibrous Clots from Deceased mRNA Injection Recipients

NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

·MAY 8

Read full story

Analysis by Greg Harrison’s team and Dr. Kevin McCairn revealed that these clots:

Are composed of misfolded proteins (amyloids)—not blood.
Contain abnormal fibrinogen ratios and high phosphorus, not typical of thrombi.
Tested positive for prion seeding using RT-QuIC, raising concerns of infectious protein activity.

As Tom Haviland prepares to present to the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association in June 2025, the data continues to point to a persistent, under-investigated, and potentially catastrophic post-vaccine pathology. Despite the reluctance of institutional authorities to act, independent researchers and embalmers worldwide are stepping up to document what many believe is one of the most urgent and unaddressed medical phenomena of our time.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

Brave New Pittsburgh: Forced Use of Psychotropic Pharmaceuticals is Coming JAMES LYONS-WEILER

Allegheny County’s AOT program threatens autonomy, expands court power, and puts pharmaceutical compliance above healing. The statification of medicine must not be allowed to occur.

MAY 16, 2025

PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS LOOMING IN PITTSBURGH. If you live in Allegheny County or in Pennsylvania, this plan must be thwarted. Action item at the end. Use your voice of dissent while you still can.

“Medical science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left.” – Aldous Huxley

The New Order of Psychiatry in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County

It begins with a promise: fewer psychiatric hospitalizations, reduced ER visits, and a new path for those with serious mental illness. But beneath the surface of Allegheny County’s push to implement Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) lies a quieter transformation—one in which the courtroom becomes the clinic, and individual agency is subordinated to pharmacological obedience.

The county claims this program will provide continuity of care, reduce the strain on the emergency and judicial systems, and prevent psychiatric relapse. They cite homelessness, incarceration, and tragic outcomes post-hospital discharge as rationale. Who wouldn’t want fewer crises and better outcomes?

But listen closely, and you’ll hear the unmistakable footsteps of a new paradigm—one that criminalizes mental states, deputizes judges and social workers as proxy psychiatrists, and leaves people with few choices besides medication or court. This is not about care. It’s about compliance.

What is AOT? Why Now?

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) is a legal mechanism allowing judges to mandate psychiatric treatment—typically pharmacological—for individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness. If someone is noncompliant and deemed at risk, the court can compel participation in outpatient treatment.

Proponents offer justifications: reducing hospitalizations, improving adherence, and preventing tragedies. Allegheny County plans to implement AOT by September 1, 2025, describing it as a step-down alternative to involuntary hospitalization. But this is not an expansion of care—it is an expansion of control.

Under AOT, noncompliance is pathologized, autonomy is dismissed, and the cycle of medication, side effects, refusal, and court reentry becomes endless. Treatment ceases to be chosen; it becomes imposed. The danger is not just the medications—it’s the machinery that removes informed refusal from the equation.

Courtrooms as Clinics: A Recipe for Bureaucratic Madness

Judges are not trained in the art of psychiatry nor in the harms of polypharmacy. But under AOT, they will apply powers as if they are.

Every time a patient misses a dose or wants to change medication, the court may be involved. Judges, untrained in medicine, determine compliance. Clinicians become monitors. Families become informants. The therapeutic alliance is replaced with legal surveillance.

In abusive domestic relationships, AOT can be weaponized. An estranged spouse or parent may use the program to control or silence someone. In schools, teachers and nurses may refer students for psychiatric evaluation under vague behavior standards.

The result is bureaucratic madness: a courtroom docket full of treatment reviews, a medical system that prescribes compliance over understanding, and a judicial system incentivized to medicate rather than listen.

The Massive Human Costs of Forced Psychotropic Compliance

Antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications come with immense risks: tardive dyskinesia, akathisia, suicidal ideation, metabolic syndrome, and cognitive blunting. These are not side effects—they are suffering.

Yet under AOT, refusal becomes further proof of illness. One is not allowed to be rational about side effects. Objections are taken as symptoms. Consent becomes irrelevant. And the data? Mixed at best. The Cochrane review found no consistent benefit from AOT over voluntary care.

We are not saving people. We are forcing them into a system that profits from their compliance while ignoring the reasons they fell through the cracks in the first place.

The Pathologization of Dissent

Refusal to comply with psychiatric recommendations is now framed as a symptom called “anosognosia”—the inability to recognize one’s illness. It is psychiatry’s trump card: any resistance is interpreted as delusion. Your protest is used against you.

This redefinition of disagreement turns informed patients into dangerous ones. It disables clinicians from hearing legitimate concerns and invites a culture of forced silence. Where will that end?

The Invention of Diagnoses and Expansion of Psychiatric Authority

Psychiatric diagnoses are created by committee, not discovered like tumors or viruses. With each revision of the DSM, new disorders emerge: Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder, Internet Gaming Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder. All of them medicalize behavior once considered part of the human condition.

This diagnostic expansion opens the door for institutional abuse, allowing AOT to be applied for behaviors as common as grief, stubbornness, or rebellion.

Family Power Struggles and the Weaponization of Pharma in Conflict

AOT invites dysfunctional family dynamics into the courtroom. Estranged spouses, abusive parents, or embittered step-relatives can initiate AOT petitions. In foster care and among the elderly, caregivers may coerce compliance as a form of control.

In Allegheny County, 20,190 children were referred to child welfare in 2015. Over 1,400 elder abuse cases were reported in 2021-2022. In these vulnerable populations, forced psychiatric care becomes another tool of exploitation, not protection.

Non-Pharmaceutical Alternatives That Work

There is no need to choose between chaos and chemical obedience. Safer, more human-centered alternatives exist:

* Neurofeedback (ILF-NFB) and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)

Nutritional psychiatry and micronutrient therapy
Ketogenic and anti-inflammatory diets
CBD and non-psychoactive cannabinoid therapies
EMDR, somatic therapy, and trauma resolution
Peer-led support networks and narrative psychiatry
Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy under consent-based protocols
Community investment: housing, purpose, and belonging

These options work—but they are not profitable for pharmaceutical companies or easy to enforce by court order. So they are ignored.

Metals Detox as Baseline Care

Twenty-four years ago, my colleague Dr. Russell Blaylock warned of an epidemic of psychiatric conditions and early onset Alzheimer’s disease in the then-newborns who were scheduled to receive so much aluminum from vaccines in the then rapidly expanded CDC recommended pediatric schedule.

In fact, many psychiatric symptoms are indistinguishable from the effects of neurotoxic heavy metals: lead, mercury, aluminum. Yet no screening is required before psychiatric drugs are prescribed—even though Allegheny County has a known legacy of lead exposure.

Detoxification protocols (chelation, nutritional repletion, binders) can be transformative. But they are never considered. The AOT program will place people with reversible neuroimmunoexcitotoxicity on heavy psychotropic meds for life, because the program assumes that metal-addled brains are broken—not poisoned.

The Untold Incentives: Who Benefits from State-Forced Compliance?

Pharmaceutical companies gain lifelong, court-mandated customers. Hospitals and clinics bill for endless compliance checks. Managed care organizations meet adherence metrics. Judges expand jurisdiction into medicine. This leads to the use of the power of state to force pharmaceutical products into people: The statification of medicine.

Even school nurses and teachers may now play a role, thanks to the “any responsible person” clause. A single report from a teacher can lead to forced treatment, a ruined life, and state-sanctioned trauma—with no meaningful avenue for appeal. Or a well-meaning neighbor. Or an abusive, gas-lighting husband.

Ethical and Legal Dilemmas: From Lead Pipes to Aluminum Needles

Pittsburgh seems like a test bed for bad idea. For decades, Pittsburgh residents drank lead-contaminated water while the county board of health looked away. When a mandate was proposed to inject aluminum-laced HPV vaccines into 7th grade girls, I stood against it beside concerned parents. By standing up for due process, was threatened with arrest for asking procedural questions. I persisted. I sued. I won.

That mandate was defeated. The Board of Health’s initiative collapsed, thwarting a national move to put vaccine mandates through at the county level. Now, the same playbook is back – and they are going for our minds.

The same county that refused to detox children’s water now wants to mandate psychiatric drugs without a toxicology screen. The same officials that tried to force aluminum into every girl now want to force psychotropics into every noncompliant adult. This is not health. This is chemical coercion.

Pittsburgh’s Choice: Innovation or Obedience?

Pittsburgh is being used—again—as a testbed for national policy. AOT is the beachhead for the statification of medicine, where care is no longer delivered but enforced. Where consent is optional. Where the state prescribes, and the courts enforce.

But we can choose another path. We can demand detox before diagnosis. Therapy before medication. Consent before compliance. Community before court.

We can stop pretending that obedience is health.

How We Got Here, Why It’s Illegal, and How We Stop It

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) in Allegheny County is not emerging from a public demand for compassionate care. It is the product of a long arc of bureaucratic and legislative engineering—one that prioritizes compliance over healing, state control over medical ethics, and predictive enforcement over constitutional protections. Sold as reform, AOT is, in truth, a return to medical coercion in modern packaging.

From Legal Protections to Predictive Policing of the Mind

The foundation was laid with Pennsylvania’s Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, which emphasized due process and limited involuntary treatment to circumstances involving immediate harm. That protection was gutted by Act 106 of 2018, which amended the law to allow courts to impose outpatient treatment—including psychotropic medication—on individuals not presently dangerous but merely “likely to deteriorate” without it.

The bar was lowered. The gate was widened. And AOT was born.

Under the Act, any responsible person—a phrase left troublingly vague—can initiate a petition. A school nurse, an ex-partner, a case manager, a landlord. The system’s threshold is not conviction, diagnosis, or even current behavior—but predicted future behavior. Once triggered, individuals may be drawn into court-supervised psychiatric regimens involving drugs, monitoring, and repeat evaluations—with no end in sight.

Why It’s Illegal: Federal Law and the Constitution Say No

Pennsylvania’s AOT regime is not just ethically questionable. It violates multiple federal protections.

45 CFR §46, part of the Common Rule, guarantees the right to informed consent in all medical interventions involving human subjects.
42 CFR §482.13 outlines hospital conditions of participation, including the right to refuse treatment.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination in services and treatment based on psychiatric disability—particularly when coercive systems target that class alone.
The 14th Amendment protects bodily autonomy and requires that deprivation of liberty occur only with due process. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled (Washington v. Harper, 1990) that forced medication requires a compelling state interest—and cannot be justified by administrative convenience.

In short, the AOT framework is operating in violation of the highest standards of American law.

What the Evidence Actually Shows

Despite its legal and ethical hazards, AOT might be tolerable—if it worked. But the best available science tells us clearly: it does not.

A landmark 2016 systematic review by Dr. Jorun Rugkåsa, published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, examined more than 80 outcome studies on Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and multiple meta-analyses. The findings were unequivocal:

“There is no evidence of patient benefit from current CTO outcome studies. This casts doubt over the usefulness and ethics of CTOs.” (Rugkåsa, 2016)

The CTOs reviewed showed no reduction in hospitalizations, no improvement in adherence, and no measurable increase in quality of life. The only consistent result? Patients under AOT-like systems spent significantly more time under coercive state control.

In the United States, a 2021 NIH-funded study by Dr. Nev Jones and colleagues published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology used grounded theory interviews with 40 youth (ages 16–27) who had experienced at least one involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. The results were chilling: 70% reported lasting distrust of clinicians, even when they continued in therapy.

One participant shared, in reflection:

“The first thing I learned as soon as I was put into the hospital was that I couldn’t actually talk about what was wrong. Because then I would be taken against my will somewhere… I’m just going to say whatever I need to say to get out.”

Another noted:

“Unless you have some condition where you don’t understand what they’re looking for… of course you know. ‘Do you want to kill yourself today?’—‘No.’ ‘Are you depressed?’—‘No.’ If you show your honesty, you get sent away. So from that point on, you’re done being honest.”

These are not anomalies. These are the predictable outcomes of coercive psychiatry masquerading as support.

Allegheny County: The New Testing Ground

This is not the first time Allegheny County has been used as a proving ground for top-down public health policy. In 2016, officials attempted to mandate aluminum-adjuvanted HPV vaccines for all seventh-grade girls. Only through public outcry, procedural intervention, and the exposure of financial conflicts of interest did that effort collapse. Several Board of Health members resigned under scrutiny.

Now, AOT is advancing through the same opaque channels: silent advisory board meetings, no public hearings, no informed public. If left unchallenged, Allegheny County will become the blueprint for a national rollout of forced outpatient psychiatric control.

What You Can Do Now

Attend the advisory board meetings and request time to comment. The Mental Health/ID Advisory Board holds regular public meetings. View the schedule here.
Apply to serve on the board. Citizen involvement is permitted. If you’re a clinician, researcher, or concerned resident, your voice is needed. Apply here.
File public records requests. Use the PA Right-to-Know Law to obtain meeting minutes, draft policies, voting records, and financial disclosures related to AOT.
Challenge in court. File complaints under the ADA or pursue relief via 42 U.S.C. §1983. When state laws conflict with federally protected rights, federal law wins.
Redirect funding to real care. Demand support for trauma-informed therapy, neurofeedback, detox protocols, and integrative mental health care that respects choice and personhood. (See the Neurofeedback Advocacy Projects stunning real-world results with infralow neurofeedback. Something to fight for!)

Allegheny County is being watched—not just by its own residents, but by policymakers nationwide eager to replicate its model. If Pittsburgh stands down, the rest will follow. But if Pittsburgh stands up, it may just become the place where the tide turned—against coercion, against silence, and toward a future where care is earned by trust, not enforced by threat.

Conclusion: A Brave New Pittsburgh or a Free One?

This is not theoretical. It is happening now. The precedent is being set. Once the state can medicate your mind by force, you are no longer a citizen. You are a ward.

Allegheny County must say no. Loudly. Finally. Irrevocably.

No to chemical compliance.

No to courtroom psychiatry.

No to medicine by mandate.

Not here. Not again. Not ever.

CONTACT THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH AND ASK THEM TO CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE TURNING PITTSBURGH INTO ALDOUS HUXLEY’S BRAVE NEW WORLD.

Top Experts Sound Alarm Over ‘Molecular Chaos’ in Covid-Vaxxed Frank Bergman

May 15, 2025

A group of world-renowned American doctors and scientists has issued a warning after alarming new data emerged revealing “molecular chaos” in people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The warning was issued during a new interview featuring bioscientist Dr. John Catanzaro, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, and epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.

During this groundbreaking discussion, the leading experts present new molecular data on patients impacted by Covid mRNA “vaccination.”

The data was uncovered during a joint investigation by Catanzaro’s Neo7Bioscience and the University of North Texas Genomics & Biodiscovery Institute.

The alarming findings of the study have exposed a concerning pattern of biological disruption.

The investigation utilized the RNA Expression Variant Instability Signature Surveillance (REViSS) platform.

The researchers analyzed peripheral blood samples from real-world patients to assess hallmark cancer-causing gene expression, detect synthetic RNA fragments, and identify dysregulated signaling pathways associated with immune dysfunction and cancer progression.

The results support mounting evidence of reverse transcription, immune destabilization, and tumor-promoting gene dysregulation in mRNA-injected individuals.

The findings have ignited debate across the biomedical and public health communities.

According to the interview, peripheral blood samples analyzed by REViSS reveal “molecular chaos” in vaccinated individuals.

The examples of “chaos” recorded include misfolded protein accumulation, oncogenic signaling, and persistent traces of vaccine-derived RNA components such as cancer-causing SV40 promoter sequences and poly(A) tails.

The team asserts that these elements are evidence of reverse transcription.

Reverse transcription is when the synthetic mRNA from the vaccine is copied into host DNA, potentially disrupting gene regulation indefinitely.

Catanzaro and McCullough cite the oft-referenced Aldén et al. (2022) study.

The study demonstrated that BNT162b2 mRNA can be reverse-transcribed in vitro in a liver cell line (Huh7).

The detection of spike-associated sequences, including synthetic elements, in blood samples months after vaccination is also a major concern.

During the interview, the experts warn that the findings are evidence that the Covid mRNA “vaccines” are behind surging cases of aggressive cancers and devastating immune system collapse.

The interview escalates its alarm by revealing that vaccinated individuals show gene expression profiles consistent with oncogenic signaling and immune collapse.

The REViSS team found that Covid “vaccines” block tumor suppressors (e.g., TP53, BRCA1/2) and activate cancer promoters, especially in glioblastoma cases emerging within months of mRNA vaccination.

McCullough, Catanzaro, and Hulscher described this process as “oncogenic flipping.”

Dr. Catanzaro also highlighted abnormal signaling in structural proteins—collagens, laminins, and misfolded matrix proteins.

He noted that these proteins could be contributors to the formation of the white, fibrous clots observed in deceased mRNA recipients recently reported by Slay News.

WATCH [1:39] https://rumble.com/v6tf6bj-top-experts-sound-alarm-over-molecular-chaos-in-covid-vaxxed.html

The data presented establish a growing body of evidence that mRNA vaccination can disrupt critical gene expression networks through persistent spike protein expression and possible genomic integration.

These disruptions are detectable long after injection.

They are also correlated with cancer progression and immune dysfunction.

Meanwhile, Hulscher is among a growing number of leading experts warning about the large “white fibrous clots” that embalmers are finding in the deceased bodies of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Hulscher recently interviewed embalmer Richard Hirschman and industrial chemist Greg Harrison about the alarming discoveries.

Hirschman and Harrison have been investigating the surging reports from embalmers around the world about the “rubbery clots.”

Before 2021, these strange clots were extremely rare, Hirschman explains.

However, since the mRNA injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021, they are now frequently being found in both veins and arteries.

Shockingly, Hirschman reports that the clots are now being found in a staggering 30-50% of all bodies he embalms.

Source: slaynews.com

BANNED: The Forgotten Miracle Cure for Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat and Dental Disease

Here’s what Big Pharma never wanted you to know about DMSO.

MAY 14, 2025

The following information is based on a report originally published by A Midwestern Doctor. Key details have been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.

The FDA has known since 1964 that DMSO could treat “incurable” conditions like blindness and tinnitus.

Instead of embracing it—they banned it. And buried the evidence for decades.

Now, people across the country are rediscovering DMSO—and the results are absolutely jaw-dropping.

This is the powerful, natural healing breakthrough Big Pharma tried to erase from history.

Upgrade to paid

The information in this article comes from the work of medical researcher

A Midwestern Doctor. For all the eye-opening details and sources, read the full 21,000-word report below.

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

How DMSO Cures Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat and Dental Disease

•DMSO can often significantly improve one’s vision, treat conditions such as macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, and at times allow blind individuals to regain their sight. It is also often very helpful for sore and strained eyes and relieves excessive irritation and inflammation, along with many other eye conditions (e.g., cataracts…

6 months ago · 1701 likes · 630 comments · A Midwestern Doctor

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) isn’t just a pain reliever.

It’s one of the most promising breakthroughs in medical history.

Why? Because it boosts circulation, reduces inflammation, reactivates dying cells, kills bacteria, and so much more.

It’s been used for arthritis, strokes—even injuries that nothing else could heal.

And the very best part? It’s extremely safe!

HOW TO DETOXIFY FROM VACCINATIONS & HEAVY METALS by Michael Edwards
October 7, 2014 Last updated on: December 15, 2015

If you choose to vaccinate (or believe you have no choice), it’s time to detoxify. This is not an article intended to debate the efficacy of vaccinations, but merely to address the toxicity from vaccinations and advise on elimination of the toxins.

Regardless of what your position on vaccinations is, any rational person cannot deny that the ingredients in vaccines are toxic. In fact, almost every single ingredient in any immunization is toxic to the human body. Besides the vitamins and minerals, nobody in their right mind would drink a concoction with any one or combination of most of the vaccine ingredients (and those vitamins and minerals they add are toxic, too). Most vaccinations are directly injected into our bodies, allowing the ingredients to directly enter the bloodstream, which rationally, seems like an even more dangerous approach.

Vaccine ingredients (adjuvants and preservatives) and substances used in the manufacturing process, including vaccine-production media that are present only in trace quantities, include: sucrose, fructose, dextrose, potassium phosphate, FD&C Yellow #6, aluminum lake dye, fetal bovine serum, sodium bicarbonate, monosodium glutamate, aluminum hydroxide, benzethonium chloride, lactose, aluminum potassium sulfate, peptone, bovine extract, formaldehyde, thimerosal, ammonium sulfate, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bovine extract), calf serum, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxphosphate sulfate, and ethanol. Vaccinations also contain many inorganic minerals, vitamins, amino acids, salts, and sugars.

If anyone can tell me why in the heck they put artificial colors into vaccines, I would love to read about it in comments. Does anyone really care what color an immunization is?

Obviously this sort of cocktail going into the bloodstream can slow things down. You are introducing heavy metals, preservatives, and a host of other inorganic compounds, most of which are not even found in nature, directly into the blood stream. Much of the vaccine material will not leave the body without assistance, especially with a typical modern lifestyle and diet.

Eat Well

The goal in order to detoxify from vaccinations is to flush the body of toxins, including heavy metals. There are a few good supplements available for chelation, but it can also be done with the right foods. Along with a healthy diet, the best ingredients for a natural heavy metal chelation regimen are chlorella, cilantro, citrus peels, spirulina, and garlic.

Most vegetables have some chelation properties, and eating combinations of vegetables increases their ability to chelate exponentially (this is true for all the health benefits). Make salads with more than ten different vegetables with lots of cilantro, avocado, and garlic every day. Avoid sugar, and avoid any and all refined, processed, manufactured foods.

Fix the Immune System

Sugars are present in vaccines, and sugars suppress the immune system. Sugars also feed parasites, viruses (indirectly), fungus, bacteria, and any other little creature that wants to harm us. These refined sugars travel through the bloodstream to wherever infection can be fed. As mentioned, lots of garlic is recommended, as well as the following supplements: oil of oregano, Echinacea, goldenseal, and goldenthread. These supplements, especially when used in conjunction with each other, will help purify the blood, remove toxins, and keep any infectious agent at bay, all while helping to repair the immune system.

In addition to those supplements, a B vitamin complex is recommended for a few weeks after immunizing. Formaldehydes, and metals like mercury and aluminum make assimilating B vitamins more difficult. Until the heavy metals are removed, the solution is to take a high quality B complex supplement and to make sure the digestive system is as healthy as possible.

Drink Lots of Fluids

I try to drink a gallon of cranberry lemonade with stevia and cayenne (click for recipe) every day. I am also 6’2” and I weigh 220 pounds. Use your best judgment. For most people, a gallon of water a has huge benefits including flushing out our system or toxins, heavy metals, and impurities, detoxifying our blood, lowering blood pressure, and reducing aging dramatically, as long as you are getting enough minerals and other nutrition while you do it. But to make drinking that much water even more difficult, for best nutrient absorption and heavy metal chelation, it’s best to take food with supplements and drink water (or lemonade) when the body is not trying to digest. You can also alternate days where you drink a lot more and eat a lot less, and vice-versa. This is a great way to detoxify quickly and get plenty of nutrition at the same time.

Exercise

Sweating, breathing hard, and moving help detoxify the body. Exercise also moves toxins that had otherwise settled, making elimination more likely. While you exercise, be sure to breathe properly. Breathe deeply from your diaphragm and expand your abdomen when you fill your air with lungs. It’s often said that 70 to 80% of the toxins we expel from our body evacuate through the lungs. The skin is the next most significant organ in regards to toxin elimination, hence the sweat with exercising. Running, exercising in a sauna (a non toxic sauna, ideally), jumping rope, rebounding, hiking with hills, squats, yoga, and tai chi are all great exercises for aiding detoxification.

Hot and Cold Hydrotherapy

Hot water increases blood flow to the surface of the body. Cold water drives the blood from the surface to the core of the body. Alternating hot and cold water increases blood flow and speeds up circulation. It brings fresh blood with oxygen and nutrients to the organs and glands and carries away toxins and waste. Dr. Shillington suggests starting with water as hot as you can stand for a minimum of two minutes. Then turn off the hot water for two minutes of cold—the colder the better. Alternate back and forth for a total of 20 minutes, ending with cold. Read more at Hot & Cold Hydrotherapy.

Supplements

Shillington’s Blood Detox is absolutely amazing, and in my mind, essential for any detox. With goldenseal, it cleans the blood, which helps every part of the body in every way.

Shillington’s Total Nutrition Formula has chlorella, spirulina, and citrus peels in it, which is awesome for detoxifying and chelating heavy metals, and it’s the best multivitamin/mineral supplement I know.

Shillington’s Intestinal Detox & Shillington’s Intestinal Cleanse will repair the intestines, remove heavy metals from the digestive tract, and promote healthy gut flora.

Boost the chelation with this powerful supplement HM Complex by Pure Encapsulations.

Oil of oregano, Echinacea, goldenseal (which is in Blood Detox), and Chinese goldthread are also highly recommended, and don’t forget the garlic and the cilantro.

B vitamin complex is recommended for a few weeks at least, since heavy metal toxicity causes the body to assimilate b vitamins inefficiently.

Keep Doing It

Unfortunately, the amount of heavy metals and other very toxic compounds in vaccines causes a huge burden on our immune system and takes a long time to expel from the body. Where the toxins settle inside the body, determines what, if any, vaccine injuries occur.

Keep in mind that heavy metals can shift. And they are heavy, as their name denotes. They often settle at the feet. A footbath detox works well for pulling toxins from the feet. More importantly, keep eating well, keep drinking lots of fluids, keep chelating, and keep exercising and detoxifying. The reality is, the healthier an individual is, the less likely they are to be injured by vaccines.

Regardless of their efficacy, the irony is, the healthier a person is, the less benefit they could possibly derive from vaccines. Also check out How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children.

Recommended Supplements:

Further Reading:

Sources:

Renowned Toxicologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Have Destroyed Immune Systems of Millions Frank Bergman

May 14, 2025

A world-renowned toxicologist has warned that millions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” have been impacted by a devastating injury, including himself.

The chilling warning was issued by the associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Western Australia, Dr. Phil Burcham.

In a blistering critique published in the May 2025 edition of the journal Quadrant, Burcham raises urgent questions about the chemical design and safety testing of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Drawing upon firsthand injury experience, insider pharmaceutical literature, and decades of toxicological science, Burcham alleges that the deployment of mRNA-LNP technologies ignored well-known formulation risks.

The Covid mRNA injections also exposed patients to unvalidated toxic excipients and sidestepped rigorous preclinical evaluation, he argues.

Burcham’s article, titled “An Injured Toxicologist Reflects on COVID mRNA Vaccines (Part II),” interrogates the molecular architecture of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platforms.

He contends that serious and rapid-onset toxicities experienced by thousands of Australians stem not solely from immune responses to spike protein but from the synthetic materials used to construct LNP delivery systems.

The top professor notes that his own debilitating trigeminal nerve injury was caused by a Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

These synthetic materials used to construct LNP delivery systems include:

Ionizable lipids (e.g., SM-102, ALC-0315)
PEGylated lipids
Unnatural modified nucleotides (e.g., pseudouridine)

Burcham’s central thesis is that mRNA vaccines were built upon unstable, “pharmacologically obese” molecules with seven well-known liabilities.

He explains that chemists tried to patch these liabilities using risky excipients rather than structural redesign.

While not an empirical study in itself, the essay draws heavily on:

Burcham’s personal toxicological training and vaccine injury
Published toxicology and pharmacology literature (e.g., Liu, Vaccines, 2019)
A 2021 exposé by Ryan Cross in Chemical & Engineering News
Unpublished biodistribution concerns from Pfizer’s own regulatory filings

This makes the piece a hybrid: expert commentary, post-market pharmacovigilance hypothesis, and forensic review of neglected preclinical science.

In his searing analysis, Burcham exposes deep flaws in the pharmacological vetting of LNP components used in Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Neither Pfizer’s nor Moderna’s mRNA lipids were supported by robust toxicological data before their mass public rollout.

Despite their pivotal role in delivering mRNA payloads, these ionizable lipids lacked transparent preclinical safety disclosures.

According to science journalist Ryan Cross’s 2021 reporting, insiders acknowledged that most LNP candidates failed in animal models after promising in vitro performance.

However, this data has never reached the public domain.

Both vaccine makers declined interviews on their lipid selection processes, adding opacity to already-opaque safety assumptions.

Burcham’s case for acute chemical toxicity is rooted in disturbing patterns of rapid-onset neurological symptoms.

These symptoms include his own experience of immediate trigeminal nerve pain post-injection.

He argues that the onset of he symptoms is far too fast to be immune-mediated.

The implication: LNPs may provoke pharmacological injury distinct from the widely discussed spike-protein-driven mechanisms.

Supporting this, Burcham references a general practitioner who reportedly summoned more ambulances for mRNA vaccine reactions in a single year than in a decade of standard vaccinations.

He suggests that such cases are not isolated flukes but indicative of a broader signal.

Beyond acute reactions, Burcham contends that the very architecture of mRNA-LNP vaccines defied long-established medicinal chemistry norms.

He critiques the decision to compensate for mRNA’s size, charge, and immunogenicity with exotic formulations.

These formulations rely on PEGylated lipids and synthetic nucleotides that introduce independent toxicity risks.

PEG allergies are known to cause hypersensitivity, and modified bases like pseudouridine, while improving mRNA stability, have toxicological parallels with older antiviral drugs linked to liver steatosis, pancreatitis, and muscle damage.

LNP developers failed to provide radiolabeled (hot) biodistribution studies or worst-case toxicology in large animals, bypassing safeguards that once would have precluded such products from mass use in healthy populations.

Burcham concludes that systemic biodistribution of LNPs—now well documented—violates foundational safety criteria and would have disqualified these products under pre-pandemic regulatory norms.

Burcham’s critique exposes a troubling pattern of regulatory shortcuts and opaque corporate practices:

No published safety studies on ionizable lipid clearance, organ accumulation, or metabolic byproducts.
No transparent peer-reviewed justification for choosing SM-102 or ALC-0315 over safer alternatives.
No systematic screening of LNP components for long-term safety in populations with known allergic, neurological, or mitochondrial susceptibility.

Even more concerning is Burcham’s assertion that companies and regulators failed to anticipate a worst-case “internal dose ≈ 100%” scenario.

This scenario is where all injected material enters the bloodstream, potentially targeting sensitive tissues like the heart and brain.

Phil Burcham’s Quadrant essay is a rare example of toxicological introspection from within the biomedical establishment.

It raises hard questions about the safety-by-design of mRNA vaccines, the opacity of lipid nanoparticle development, and the failure to heed long-established medicinal chemistry wisdom.

If Burcham’s account is correct, then millions of people, especially those reporting rapid-onset or persistent neurological symptoms, may have been injured not solely by the spike protein but by the very materials used to deliver it.

The implications for regulatory reform, vaccine injury compensation, and pharmaceutical transparency are profound.

However, these concerns remain underexplored by global regulatory agencies.

Until they are directly addressed in open-access, peer-reviewed research, the public will be left wondering whether safety was sacrificed in the rush to deploy novel mRNA technologies.

“Parasite Treatments and Cancer” w/ Dr. Peter McCullough Naomi Wolf

MAY 13, 2025

“Dr. Peter McCullough, health freedom hero and distinguished cardiologist, addresses some key medical stories in the news. Dr. Casey Means, nominee for Surgeon General, actually never sat for her board certification, so is not fully qualified as a ‘surgeon.’ President Trump signed an executive order to ban gain-of-function research and is now dropping the price of certain drugs. And: a new anti-parasite protocol developed by Dr. McCullough and The Wellness Company shows promise not only for killing parasites but for treating cancer.”

Watch Now:

Is Medicare a Slow-Kill Program? DR. COLLEEN HUBER

Is this seemingly benevolent reward offered to seniors for a lifetime of work, rather, a guiding hand to the grave?

SEP 04, 2022

The new “Inflation Reduction Act” (IRA) has a name that is highly questionable, given its profligate and inflation-stimulating government spending, such as one quarter trillion dollars for climate change tax credits for corporations, and for 87,000 additional IRS agents. The falsification of the name of this Act alone rings alarm bells for violation of 18 USC Section 1001, which makes it a felony for any government actor to falsify a material fact in a document related to a federal matter. This crime carries up to five years in prison.

However, the fine print of the IRA may be even nastier for seniors, black people, and so ultimately for all of the rest of us.

This new Act pairs Medicare decisions to a group called the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), to carry out cost-effectiveness research (CER). This review panel is the rehabilitated “death panel” that was so controversial during Obamacare rollout. Based on this guidance, Medicare will set drug prices based on costs to its program of funding an additional year of patients’ continued lives with a specific drug versus already existing therapies.

Especially on the chopping block are drugs that treat sickle cell anemia and multiple myeloma, which are diseases that disproportionately affect black people, as well as drugs that treat ALS and chronic kidney disease, which disproportionately affect seniors.

If you think our benevolent government would never place a person’s life on the chopping block for being too expensive to continue, consider what ICER President Steve Pearson wrote about orphan drug spending, that it places “an undue burden . . . on others for the sake of a few.” And earlier he wrote “Looking forward, . . . broad application of the rule of rescue will be increasingly untenable.” Choosing drugs that would end up having the effect of shortening lives, rather than those that would end up lengthening lives, turns the bean counters into “de facto death panels,” according to writer Robert Goldberg.

But does Medicare find it so cost-effective for seniors to die earlier that its drug prices would take that cost-benefit analysis into consideration? That is, is it unreasonable to make the leap from there to the suspicion that Medicare might actually be a slow-kill program?

Who has really been ‘killing Grandma’ in the COVID era?

Freely breathing creatures of the human variety were criticized and shamed for our unobstructed respiratory practices, through the COVID era, for ‘killing Grandma’ by lack of mask-wearing. But was it us, the relentlessly unmasked, who were killing Grandma?

Scrutiny of Medicare’s mission might have been seen as preposterous before COVID, a respiratory viral disease for which the world went crazy, but actually had no greater mortality than the flu virus. Infection fatality for COVID is 0.15%, and for a typical annual flu is usually about 0.17% (Statista data from 2006 to 2008, back when the counting was more straightforward.) COVID symptoms varied from typical flu, especially loss of smell and reduced oxygenation, but otherwise the death rate remained about the same as most years.

Yet for this typical seasonal viral mortality, hospital protocols, among much else in our world, have transformed to something utterly unrecognizable from the recent past. Ventilators were ordered, distributed and quickly connected to many tracheas, to a worldwide chorus of muffled protests, both from the victims of an over-pressurized tube rammed down the throat, and from their family members who were made to wait outside. More about this bizarre new protocol below.

Why are Americans forced onto Medicare at age 65?

Before COVID, I never thought too much about Medicare, having been younger then, as we all were. But recently I noticed the fine print at Medicare.gov says that if a person turning 65 chooses NOT to accept Medicare Part B, which covers primary visits and their referred specialists – and which are exclusively within conventional medicine, never, never naturopathic medicine – So if you refuse to sign up for Medicare Part B, your social security payment is REDUCED, and it is reduced for life, and there is no way to get out of this reduction. Furthermore, this reduction is called a “penalty.” I thought: Wow! Here I have to pay my entire working life for a type of medicine that I never use, (conventional medicine) and have zero desire to use. And then, even the meager social security living allowance is actually reduced if I, a naturopathic physician, don’t succumb and submit to a type of medicine that I have avoided my whole life like plague? (I have had best knowledge and help from my naturopath and my chiropractor; they are my only primary care doctors, and the only ones I have needed at all for the decades that I have known them, including through a bout with COVID and a disabling acute injury, both now long gone.)

So this blatant First Amendment violation is baked right into Medicare policy. But let’s explore further how it plays out in the case of retirees.

It turns out that an employee arriving to age 65 is at the mercy of an employer, particularly if in a small company. On this page, Medicare.gov implies that an employer, particularly of under 20 employees, has the right to commit age discrimination, in blatant violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. This could have the effect of forcing the 65-year old employee off of the company insurance that other employees still have, by virtue of their youth, and onto Medicare, at the discretion of the employer. It seems that Medicare is begging for litigation against this mandate and this penalty.

I would argue that this forced herding into conventional medicine is a violation also of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . .” What could Medicare possibly have to do with religion? Well, you see, if one believes that the synthetic, mono-molecular, patented chemicals that are produced in factories by a pharmaceutical industry could possibly have beneficial or restorative or synergistic – or even well-tolerated – impact on a body that is the heritage of millions of years of intimate contact with the biodiversity of nature – If one would like to believe that, one is certainly welcome to do so. It just doesn’t happen to be a creed to which I subscribe.

Therefore, I feel a bit like the Virginia colonial Baptists who complained to Jefferson and Madison about being forced to pay taxes to the Anglican Church, not being Anglicans themselves. Jefferson and Madison agreed with the right of the Baptist protestors to be free of Anglican control, and as a result we have the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which protects you and me from being subject to the rituals, sacraments, forced worship, genuflection, church attendance and tithes of someone else’s religion.

Therefore, I think the Medicare Part B penalty is unconstitutional and unjust.

And why would people be penalized for rejecting a “free” entitlement? What is the government’s motive for inflicting this penalty? Is it that living a long healthy life without chronic disease, on a natural medicine regimen is too expensive for the social security fund? Is it no longer commendable to make it to one’s 90’s or over 100 years of age? Perhaps only a conspiracy theorist could even imagine an entitlement being subject to an actuarial priority, or could imagine a goal to eliminate the long-lived, unvaccinated, natural living cohort, for unwanted illustration and example of the benefits of that lifestyle to others.

Next, let’s look at what happened in hospitals during peak COVID

Now let’s go back to how COVID changed hospitalization and particularly “healthcare” and its creeping inclusion of euthanasia, in the case of seniors.

Since COVID came along, the public has had brief, not-well-publicized glimpses into the much-altered lives and health of hospital patient escapees, and we have heard some horrendous stories of how they were treated while there. As a physician, I have heard through the stethoscope radically altered heart rhythms of such escapees who managed to survive a Remdesivir assault. Remdesivir is a drug that is known to be highly toxic to the liver and the kidneys and the lungs. Multiple organ failure was repeatedly observed after use of this drug. Yet it is Anthony Fauci’s drug of choice for treating COVID. Remdesivir has been observed to lead to respiratory failure in 11% of the patients who are on it for 10 days (“commonly reported,”) even to the point of then requiring intubation.

So Remdesivir is clearly contraindicated in COVID patients, yet in the upside-down world of hospital medicine, it is “standard of care.”

Hospital COVID procedures in the US have been revealed in horrifying anecdotes, empirical observations by very rare whisteblower nurses and doctors. For example, in 2020, ER physician Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell blew the whistle on ventilators that had an 80% mortality rate within a couple days of use with COVID patients. He asked why it was expected for him to be blowing patients’ functional lung tissue out with way over-pressurized ventilators, noting the high mortality. Nurses would mention hospital patients who in 2020-2021 were deprived of both food and water, with a story of a hospitalized man who had to crawl on hands and knees to not be seen by the staff, to the toilet bowl, in order to get a drink of water, and others’ similar desperate grasps for survival. This was especially the case with seniors who were positive for COVID, and even more discriminatory for patients with multiple co-morbidities.

With COVID, came the 2020 US CARES Act, a little-mentioned $160 billion, then $178 billion, boondoggle (more than double the cost of the Ukraine boondoggle so far, AND before intense recent inflation). This Act funded some very peculiar hospital protocols – with tens of millions, and hundreds of millions, of dollars going to the biggest hospitals for COVID treatment.

Yet, in the US, we still have little system-wide testimony or evidence of brutality to hospitalized COVID patients revealed in the mass media to the public. Unfortunately, many of the closest witnesses are now dead.

So let’s then look at the UK, and then what we know of parallels between the UK and the US.

The UK has revealed more of the financial and political involvement in euthanasia decisions in high-risk hospital situations, in publicly available documents.

Journalist Maajid Nawaz spoke with UK medical researcher Stuart Wilkie. https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/Radical-Episode-17:d

Wilkie told Nawaz, “Hundreds of thousands of people are being routinely murdered in the National Health Service.” Where does he get that information? Well, he found in the House of Lords Library and the House of Commons Library some revealing documents.

Chris Whitty, England’s Chief Medical Officer, in a document that he insisted not be released to the public, wrote of “consideration of mass burials and the potential use of population triage by the NHS . . . [which raised questions of] potential responses of the general population upon hearing that such measures were being considered or used.” This document is in the House of Lords Library.

Euthanasia has been openly discussed and openly practiced. Here we see a House of Commons definition: “A good death requires three things: syringe drivers, the medications, and the staff to administer it.” Euthanasia is from the Greek for “good death.” This mass killing was financially incentivized, and lack of cooperation was disincentivized in UK hospitals.

UK patients are also disincentivized from choosing to live. When a hospital patient is pressured to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order, they are told ‘if we try to resuscitate you, we will break your ribs.’ You don’t want painful broken ribs, do you? At every step, from hospital triage and admittance to treatment, seniors suffered by far the worst of any age group.

It is not in dispute that the UK government ordered an inordinately large amount of Midazolam in the COVID era. By the time peak COVID mania had crested, 27 months of drugs were used within 9 months in the UK. Somehow Midazolam was added to treatment for COVID disease protocol. As Nawaz asks, “Why add a drug that makes it harder for you to breathe?” when COVID already impairs oxygenation?

Midazolam should have been the LAST thing a COVID patient would be given.

Oh, it was the last thing they were given alright. Together with another respiratory depressant, acting in lethal synergy. That drug is morphine.

The amount of Midazolam needed to kill a person within 24 hours is about 9.5 mg, and this was used in UK hospitals, where 83% of those died within 24 hours on that dose, together with 14 mg morphine, which has a highly dangerous synergistic effect, when dosed together with Midazolam, of respiratory depression. It has been known for decades that these drugs used together risk respiratory arrest, which is lethal.

In the United States, where states permit execution by lethal injection, Midazolam is one of the major drugs used for that purpose.

NEW STUDY — Spike Protein Detected in 92% of Vaccine-Injured Patients Up to 245 Days After Injection NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

92% of symptomatic individuals with post-vaccine syndrome had spike protein in their immune cells up to 8 months after injection—raising serious concerns about post-vaccination chronic disease burden.

MAY 13, 2025

The study titled, Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16+ monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals, was just published in the journal Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics:

ABSTRACT

Despite over 13 billion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses administered globally, persistent post-vaccination symptoms, termed post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), resemble post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Symptoms like cardiac, vascular, and neurological issues often emerge shortly after vaccination and persist for months to years, mirroring PASC. We previously showed the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein persists in CD16+ monocytes after infection, potentially driving PASC. Approved vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca) deliver synthetic S1 to elicit immunity, suggesting a shared mechanism. We hypothesized that vaccine-derived S1 persistence in CD16+ monocytes sustains inflammation akin to PASC, contributing to PCVS. We studied 50 individuals with PCVS symptoms lasting over 30 days post-vaccination and 26 asymptomatic controls, using (1) machine learning-based immune profiling to compare cytokine signatures with PASC, (2) flow cytometry to detect S1 in CD16+ monocytes, and (3) LC-MS to confirm S1 across vaccine types. We correlated S1 persistence with symptom duration and inflammation. Prior infection was excluded via clinical history, anti-nucleocapsid antibody tests, and T-detect assays, though definitive tests are lacking. Preliminary findings suggest S1 persistence in CD16+ monocytes and an associated inflammatory profile may contribute to PCVS. Further studies are needed to confirm causality and prevalence.

Here are the key findings:

Spike Protein Found in Immune Cells Months After Vaccination

The S1 portion of the spike protein—produced by the COVID-19 vaccines—was detected in circulating immune cells (CD16+ monocytes) up to 245 days after vaccination, in individuals who had never tested positive for COVID-19 and had no evidence of prior infection based on antibody and T-cell testing.

These individuals reported persistent symptoms resembling Long COVID (PASC), but they had only received the vaccine—not the virus.

Call for action – please submit public comment to the FDA asking them to remove mRNA shots from market SASHA LATYPOVA

MAY 13, 2025

ACIP is meeting on May 22 to decide on the “updated formula” for 2025-2026 Covid-19 injections for the United States. Page to submit public comments available here:

Link to submit public comment

Let’s flood them with comments and see if this administration is going to deliver on their promises, and promises to whom – the people or the pharma?

Use These 5 Food Hacks To Heal The Body & STARVE CANCER I Dr. William Li [28:24]

April 5, 2025 – Use These 5 Food Hacks To Heal The Body & STARVE CANCER I Dr. William Li

Catherine Austin Fitts: We Know That mRNA Technology is a Killer, and Yet We See the President Supporting It [VIDEO 2:06:15] LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY

“…since the Trump inauguration, 2.6 million children have been given mRNA shots…So this, to me, is nothing short of murder.”

Source: Sense Receptor

“We know that mRNA technology is a killer, and yet we see the president supporting it…the constituencies that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening…are very, very strong…but this is nothing short of murder.”

Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report, describes for Jimmy Dore) how the mRNA injections that have been launched on the world constitute “murder.”

Despite their apparent danger, however, the former HUD official notes that there are entrenched “constituencies…that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening.”

“If you look at what’s happened with the effort to change the policies so that we don’t poison our children, what the confirmation of Kennedy at HHS said, the failure to get Weldon put into CDC, and the switch now on the Surgeon General, what it says to me is the constituencies that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening, those constituencies are very, very strong,” Fitts says.

Fitts adds, “We know that MRNA technology is a killer, and yet we see the president supporting MRNA technology… I just saw a tweet, and I haven’t had time to confirm it since the beginning of the year, but since the Trump inauguration, 2.6 million children have been given mRNA shots. There’s been no change in the heavy ‘vaccine’ schedules. We don’t need studies to show where autism is coming from. We know where it’s coming from. So this, to me, is nothing short of murder.”

After Dore shows Fitts a clip of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary saying he’s not sure sure if a healthy 12-year-old girl should receive a seventh COVID booster, Fitts notes that “He’s lying because in the box.” The former HUD official adds, “He’s not allowed to say the truth.”

Full Video

MASS ARRESTS NOW: The Horrific Fauci “Experiments” [VIDEOS] 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

MAY 11, 2025

Dr. Fauci aka Dr. Mengele 2.0, former White House Chief Medical Adviser and prominent PSYOP-19 scamdemic orchestrator, was carefully selected by his Intelligence-Industrial Complex handlers just prior to their tragic AIDS con.

Early in his career, Fauci was installed at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a clinical associate in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’s (NIAID) Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (LCI) precisely because of his especially malignant sociopathic tendencies.

And Fauci certainly did not disappoint, proving during the manufactured AIDS crisis that he was the perfect man to seed the fraudulent “Trust the Science” scam by running his warmup beta test trial mass murder operation costing hundreds of thousands of lives way back in the 1980s (AZT rhymes with Remdesivir), all while arranging all kinds of terrifying “experiments” from pointless animal torture to deadly and illegal gain of function (GOF) bioterror “research” to utterly depraved trials that were worse than the most twisted horror movies; to wit:

FAUCI was SEWING DEAD BABY SCALPS ON the BACKS of MICE, and taxpayers were funding it. The tissue had to be alive for this experiment to begin with, so the bigger question is, where was FAUCI getting the dead babies from and were these babies aborted on purpose for for these horrific experiments that taxpayers had no idea they were funding?

Not only was Fauci specifically in charge of these experiments, but he had to sign off, approve the funding, and come up with the experiment in the first place. From experimenting and torturing beagle dogs, letting sand flies eat them alive, to using purposely aborted babies, to purposely creating dangerous bioweapons and hiding in under the false pretense of “vaccine science,” Fauci needs and should have been in prison decades ago. Arrest Fauci now for crimes against humanity.

Source

All of this sickening “work” as paid from theft via “income” taxes, just like the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon C19 “vaccines” were foisted on humanity for “free” off the backs of the very tax slaves they were attempting to peacefully cull.

Talk about being forced to pay for your own demise, and paying for pointless and sickening “research” that goes directly against everything humanity stands for.

And for all of his Crimes Against Humanity, Dr. Fauci was richly rewarded, with his household assets growing by the millions after his convenient retirement, and his net worth topping more than $15 million. During his bioterror reign at the Federal agency level, Fauci also happened to be the highest-paid government bureaucrat, making $480,000 per year when he stepped down, or more than the President of the United States. This does not even account for his Intelligence-Industrial Complex black ops money laundered offshore accounts.

Crime pays, and mind-bending horror-show levels of crime apparently pays even better.

Thankfully, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is currently conducting an investigation into Fauci and the origins of PSYOP-19; if this is an honest inquiry, then it will be an open and shut case:

HOLY SH*T!! We know why Fauci requested a preemptive pardon!

The biolabs in Ukraine are REAL!

Tulsi Gabbard: “We are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on this, as well as Secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan Lab, as well as many others.”

“Many of these other biolabs around the world were actually US-funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.”

“It’s because this gain-of-function research is happening in biolabs around the world. That by the way is still on the US Embassy Ukraine’s website today about how the US has funded these biolabs.”

“US -unded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another Covid like pandemic. And for that I was called a Russian asset. You’re, you know, trumpeting Putin’s talking points.”

“All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts. That by the way are still on US Embassy Ukraine’s website today about how the US has funded these biolabs in Ukraine”

Source

Mass arrests would not just include Fauci, but also the likes of “philanthropist” Bill Gates, as well as a long-winding procession of other government, BigPharma and corporate apparatchik coconspirators, with particular emphasis on CIA Manchurian Candidate extraordinaire Barack Hussein Obama, who was instrumental in offshoring GOF “research” to the CCP’s Wuhan Institute of Virology ahead of their planned C19 release:

“It’s effective. This vaccine is tailored for kids.”

The mass arrests can’t come soon enough.

Do NOT comply.

[Ed.:

Dr. Yeadon: ‘This Study in Rats is Devastating…It Strikes Me as Satanic.’ By Dr. Michael Yeadon

Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on “The mRNA-based pseudo-“vaccines” destroy over 60% of non-renewable egg supply of female rats.” by Suavek

May 10, 2025

Thank you, Suavek, for making me aware of this.

As you know, I’ve been very concerned about designed-in toxicity of the fake vaccines for very many years.

This study in rats is devastating. It is conventional in the field of toxicology to assume that what happens in lab animals does predict toxicity in humans UNLESS there is evidence that mitigates it, which there isn’t here.

Please share this along with my note.

I’m continually angry about this aspect particularly. It strikes me as satanic.

P.S: I’m sorry to assail you so often with upsetting information. My heart is heavy.

Dr Mike Yeadon:

I’ve not returned to reproductive toxicity risk since first pointing it out with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg in our open letter to European Medicines Agency on December 1st, 2020. That letter was extremely thoroughly censored and picked up by almost nobody, even so called alternative media.

It was known with certainty even before the faked regulatory authorisations that prompting the body to manufacture non-self proteins WILL trigger autoimmune diseases. Not a maybe. It’s a will do so. The doctors were taught this in medical school. It’s Immunology 101. It’s the basis of avoiding failures of organ transplants.

It was also known in 2012 if not earlier that any macromolecules formulated in lipid nanoparticles leads to preferential deposition of the payload INTO THE OVARIES.

Combine the propensity to trigger autoimmune destruction from the jabs and the accumulation of payload into the ovaries and it was obvious what the risks were.

Whether problems would actually occur we could not say.

But the theoretical risk was extraordinarily high.

And there was no attempt to derisk the obvious risks by means of reproductive toxicology.

By the way, full package reproductive toxicology studies HAVE STILL NOT BEEN DONE.

Why not? Because, as has been my contention from the very beginning, the design intent of these injections was always to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.

I doubted the aim was to sterilise everyone, because that Wouk’s lead to premature discovery.

I could do nothing more. I had to wait outcomes. I still do.

This study of course is one of many that I’ve long pointed out are routine requirements for even contemplating administration to anyone at or currently below reproductive age, so not to girl children let alone healthy young women (broadly classified as Women Of Childbearing Potential – WOCBP).

Since thalidomide in the eariy 1960s, all new medical interventions have been considered as presumptive reproductive toxins.

Accordingly they are NEVER offered to WOCBP, even if there’s an arguable benefit to them. Even after extensive reproductive toxicology testing has been completed and nothing abnormal detected, new medical interventions are still not recommended. Over time, what’s often termed a “natural experiment” occurs, here being inadvertent administration to WOCBP and yet no hints of reprotox issues arising. That added to a clean reprotox profile usually leads to cautious use in this population. By that time we also have decent data on utility of the medical intervention.

The bottom line is that EVERY doctor knew of this path to cautious use in WOCBP because they’re taught it in medical school. I accuse every doctor who jabbed girls and young women of deliberate assault and they did it for money and to retain their privileges in the system.

They should apologise profoundly and show contrition. Ideally by resigning. People do not need such doctors in the system.

I expect continued radio silence from the vast majority of doctors.

My entire family has zero respect for medical doctors, and this isn’t recoverable in my lifetime, and probably not in my adult children’s lifetime either.

I’m not ever going to shut up about this. Please pick it up and show everyone you know.

Thank you,

Dr Mike Yeadon

Dangerous Games ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

The BSL-4 facility at Fort Detrick is a danger to the American public

MAY 10, 2025

At a BSL-4 high-security risk laboratory located at Fort Detrick, an army base in Frederick, MD, during March 2025 there was a serious incident involving two laboratory workers. It is reported that one of the workers poked holes in the high biocontainment suit of another worker, potentially exposing the latter to at least one dangerous pathogen, although the specific pathogen was not disclosed.

Dr. Richard H. Ebright reports that the NIH BSL-4 facility at Ft. Detrick is contractor-staffed and contractor-operated. So, neither NIH nor military staff were directly involved in the incident. He found evidence that this facility was staffed and operated through a $116 million minority-set-aside contract to a Native Hawaiian LLC contractor located in an office park in Orlando, Florida.

These sorts of contracting arrangements are common in the DoD, and reflect preferential award ranking conferred to companies that are native American-owned, which has resulted in a rather odd business model of shell small minority-owned company prime contractors under which the usual larger contractors operate as subcontractors. The small minority-owned company prime contractor is granted a few years to operate with these special privileges and then typically folds, a new company is formed with the same basic ownership, the special privileges then apply to the newco for the same period, and the cycle repeats itself. This works for the large corporate “subcontractors” as it provides them some legal cover in terms of compliance with burdensome Federal Acquisition Regulation contract terms and conditions. A win-win for all concerned except taxpayer, government, and warfighter.

A BSL-4 laboratory is the highest level of biocontainment designed for work with the most dangerous and exotic pathogens. There are reportedly only fourteen Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories in the United States. The level of training and skill required to work in these labs is extensive, and there are relatively very few people with the skills needed to work directly with such pathogens. Furthermore, Personnel must pass FBI-led security risk assessments (SRAs) to handle Tier 1 agents like anthrax.

These are the types of pathogens housed in the facilities, most are considered tier 1 pathogens, which are considered the most deadly:

These facilities are supposedly for the development of new vaccines, as it is the official narrative that bioweapons research in the United States ended in 1969. Research yielding new technologies or information with the potential for both benevolent and harmful purposes is referred to as “dual-use research.” The justification for bio-weapons research is therefore carefully parsed to suggest that there are alternative, more benign reasons for conducting this research. But the dual-use narrative doesn’t account for the anthrax research that led to the weaponized anthrax spore leaks that were associated with the anthrax attacks in 2001.

What is commonly written about that attack is that the anthrax used was the Ames strain of Bacillus anthracis. This strain is known as a highly virulent laboratory strain that was originally isolated from a cow in Texas in 1981. It is widely used by the U.S. Army for vaccine development and challenge studies due to its potency. Although it was reported that the anthrax was weaponized, there is little information available on why anthrax was being weaponized at Fort Detrick in 2021, which was done so by making it capable of being aerosolized. Once aerosolized, anthrax then becomes a weapon capable of mass destruction via a variety of weapons platforms. Anthrax is relatively easy to weaponize, and has been used in biological attacks globally during the twentieth century.

Following the anthrax attacks of 2001 that resulted in five deaths, Congress significantly strengthened oversight of select agents by passing the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 and the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 requiring HHS & USDA to publish regulations for possession, use, and transfer of select agents. However, these regulations only include requirements for registration, security risk assessments, restricted access, security, biosafety, restricted experiments, incident response, training, transfers, records, inspections, notification of theft, loss, or release, and civil penalties. These regulations are tricky, and a careful analysis suggests that they do not appear to specify what these agents can’t be used for.

The weaponized anthrax was actively being manipulated in 2001 by Dr. Ivins and his staff at Fort Detrick. There is not a chance in heck that making anthrax a respiratory pathogen is necessary for development of a vaccine. Hence, the work being conducted on anthrax in 2001 was not bio-defense or dual-use but bio-weapons research. Those writing of the anthrax attacks at the time somehow miss this logical conclusion. Just what the heck was the army lab doing – making anthrax a weapon of mass destruction?

After this event, Congress appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci to head the BSL-4 laboratory at Fort Detrick, which was repositioned under NIAID, and in compensation for this added responsibility awarded him a substantial raise with specific pay adjustments for his biodefense-related work. When he retired in 2024, he was earning almost half a million dollars a year.

So, what was and is now going on at the BSL-4 lab at Fort Detrick lab is anyone’s guess.

Fast forward to this year’s “incident.” An incident that potentially could have resulted in a mass casualty event. This criminal act was not disclosed to the head of NIH, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, until weeks after it occurred. When he was alerted (after the fact), he closed down the laboratory and announced the incident to the press.

The titillating aspect of this crime is that this was a “lover’s spat.” The two co-workers involved were in a toxic relationship that had turned sour. But how is it even possible that a person with advanced safety training in BSL-4 laboratory techniques and having passed the FBI’s pass FBI-led security risk assessments, surreptitiously poke holes in another’s containment suit?

Now, we don’t know what pathogens they were working on, but… At the very least, this should have triggered a police investigation and arrest.

If the intent was to cause serious bodily harm, the accused should face charges of aggravated assault or assault with a deadly weapon, both of which are felonies. If the pathogen(s) being worked with were deadly, charges might have even included attempted manslaughter or murder, even attempted mass murder. Of note, Dr. Richard Ebright asserts on X that the co-worker did try to murder the other worker.

However, a search of arrest records or reports from Frederick County, MD, reveals no such arrest records. Which certainly makes one wonder. What the heck is going on at that military base?

The incident is not isolated; it is part of a broader pattern of safety lapses at Fort Detrick, with additional (details undisclosed) incidents reported in 2024. These repeated breaches have highlighted what officials and outside experts carefully describe as a “poor culture of safety” at the facility. Problems cited include poor documentation of select agents (dangerous pathogens), discrepancies between inventory logs and actual stock levels, and a general lack of psychological screening for personnel handling high-risk materials.

In 2019, CDC Director Robert Redfield closed Fort Detrick after an inspection revealed leaks and mechanical issues in a newly installed chemical system meant for decontaminating wastewater at the facility. These safety concerns heightened worries about possible releases of dangerous biological agents, leading the CDC to pause research activities at the site until the problems were addressed.

The details of the shutdown were not publicly disclosed at the time, with the CDC citing national security as the reason for keeping information about the closure private. This lack of transparency raised public concern and prompted requests for more information regarding possible health and safety risks associated with the laboratory. The facility reopened by the end of March 2020 (!! Key date relevant to the COVID timeline) after resolving the remaining wastewater issues.

Notably and admittedly a rabbit hole, but some of the above research was sourced from CHAT-GPT3. So, as usual, the references were reviewed to weed out the propaganda. The main reference source that emerged was the official newspaper of the CCP. For a mind-blowing exercise of alternate reality theories to the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, read that article linked above and then the following article titled: “Politicians told to stay out of virus origins debate.” Notably, several inaccuracies are present in those articles, including the claim that the USA has never ratified the bioweapons convention and is the only country not to do so. Once one finds such errors, the entire document becomes suspect.

Back to the story at hand…

Dr. Bhattacharya, Director of NIH, wrote on X that the

“ongoing investigation revealed a pattern — going back to the Biden administration — of safety not taken as seriously as it ought. So with Sec. Kennedy’s blessing, I immediately ordered all work to halt & all dangerous pathogens secured. I won’t reopen the lab until I am satisfied that it can be done with zero risk to public safety. No more lab-generated pandemics!”

It is unclear when NIH will give the green light to reopen this BSL-4 laboratory, but this event is yet another warning signal that bio-defense and bio-weapons research must be largely shut down.

What we do know is that in this instance, NIH acted quickly and responsibly to not only address the issue but to alert the American people transparently. Or as transparently as a classified incident such as this can be reported on.

It is time to not only end all gain-of-function, it is time to stop dangerous dual-use research, which includes both bio-defense and bio-weapons development. Human beings are imperfect, become psychologically unhinged from time to time, and can be prone to a wide range of dangerous instincts and actions. Highly pathogenic organisms and high-pressure scientific research have repeatedly led to containment “errors” and mistakes that put the entire population at risk.

Is the juice really worth the squeeze?

Read previous articles

Total Page Visits: 180 - Today Page Visits: 1

KrakenNews.us

Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 5/16/25

About the author

About the author

Related Posts