Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!

Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?

If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal recourse is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org

How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]

DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]

BREAKING: Hospital Murder Labeled as COVID-19 Death is Going to JURY TRIAL KAREN KINGSTON

The Schara’s legal team has broken-through ‘iron-clad’ lawfare tactics from the defendant’s (including the PREP Act ‘immunity’) and Grace’s medical assailants will now face a jury of their peers.

MAY 22, 2025

May 23, 2025: During ‘the pandemic,’ hundreds of millions of Americans suffered through the unconscionable and unlawful COVID-19 mandates, from forcing 2-year-olds to wear masks to mandatory vaccinations to work or attend, but we survived. However, for the hundreds of thousands of Americans who unfortunately needed to seek emergency medical care during this time, many were hospitalized and isolated from their loved ones leaving them defenseless against the heavily financially incentivized medical-industrial complex to deny them proper treatments, inject them with sedatives and toxins, and then induce kidney failure, respiratory failure and death with Remdesivir and by ventilating the patients. Many of these patients were falsely labeled as COVID-19 deaths, but the truth of the matter is… the ‘hospital healthcare protocols’ were nothing short of medical murder (aka wrongful death).

Scott Schara’s 19-year -old, Grace, was medically murdered on October 13, 2021, at Ascension St. Elizabeth Hospital, Appleton, Wisconsin.

Image from Our Amazing Grace

She was given a lethal concoction of three contraindicated meds (Precedex, Lorazepam, and Morphine) causing her heart and lungs to fail. Her doctor then ordered an illegal DNR (do not resuscitate) and place it on her chart the morning of her death. The hospital denied Grace’s family visitation during this time, and they tragically watched her die over an iPad screen.

St. Elizabeth’s Hospital Messed with the Wrong Family

The Schara’s are a strong God-fearing family led by Grace’s dad, Scott. Scott has had an ongoing 4-year battle seeking justice for Grace’s wrongful death and victory is on the horizon.

Graphene and the Covid-19 Vaccines Romeo Quijano 2003

Abstract

One of the most controversial issues surrounding the Covid-19 vaccines is the alleged presence of graphene, mainly in the form of graphene oxide, in these vaccines. After the roll-out of the vaccines, a group in Spain, La Quinta Columna, headed by Dr. Ricardo Delgado, claimed that graphene oxide was found in some vials of the covid vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Astra-Zeneca and Janssen). Their claim was based mainly on the scientific study done by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Associate Professor in Chemistry at the University of Almeria, Spain (1). In this study, Dr. Campra concludes: “A random sampling of COVID19 vaccine vials has been performed using a coupled micro-RAMAN technique to characterize graphene-like microscopic objects using spectroscopic fingerprints characteristic of the molecular structure. The micro-RAMAN technique allows to reinforce the level of confidence in the identification of the material by coupling imaging and spectral analysis as observational evidence to be considered together. Objects have been detected whose RAMAN signals by similarity with the standard UNEQUIVOCABLY correspond to GRAPHENE OXIDE.

Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines! [Germs Are Born In Us and From Us as an Outfection and NOT an Infection of the Body Cells. In otherwords germs are symptoms of cellular and genetic disorganization and NOT the specific cause of the cellular and genetic disorganization! The GERM is NOTHING and the TERRAIN is EVERYTHING. Germs can only contribute to a state of toxic imbalance but NEVER cause

COVID Vaccine “Safe and Effective” Narrative Collapses on Camera

Biden Regime Hid Deadly COVID-19 Vaccine Heart Risks From Public, Explosive Senate Report Finds

Biden officials knew about potential COVID-19 vaccine risks — and took steps to downplay them: scathing Senate report By Ryan King

Biden officials knew about potential COVID-19 vaccine risks — and took steps to downplay them: scathing Senate report

May 21, 2025 New York Post – Top federal health officials actively took steps to “delay warning the public” for months in 2021 about the potential risks of heart-related complications from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, a scathing interim report from Sen. Ron Johnson’s office alleges.

Starting in February 2021, federal health agencies had been alerted to “large reports of myocarditis” in young people who received the Pfizer vaccine, but waited until late June that year to adjust the vaccine labels to make that side effect known.

“Even though CDC and FDA officials were well aware of the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, the Biden administration opted to withhold issuing a formal warning to the public for months about the safety concerns, jeopardizing the health of young Americans,” the 54-page interim report said.

Myocarditis is an inflammatory condition of the heart muscle, while pericarditis entails inflammation of the lining sac around the heart. Myopericarditis is a combination of the two ailments.

Most patients who suffer from those side effects eventually experience “resolution of symptoms,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“Tasking nonexperts to adjudicate tweets on complex topics like myocarditis and mask efficacy data was destined for a significant error rate,” independent journalist David Zweig, who helped report on the Twitter Files, later reflected.

Even after health officials adjusted the labels, individuals who raised concerns about myocarditis were targeted. Philadelphia cardiology clinic owner Anish Koka’s Twitter account was suspended in September 2022 for ostensibly linking to a review of post-vaccine myocarditis. The account was later reinstated after Koka agreed to delete the tweet.

Johnson claimed that around the time of internal CDC deliberations over myocarditis, his office received “a growing number of letters” from doctors and other health care professionals who “experienced suppression and censoring of this information they [were] experiencing.”

His report explained that some available data raised concerns about myocarditis in early 2021, but top health brass really began examining the matter after Feb. 28, 2021 when an Israeli Ministry of Health official attempted to contact the CDC and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about 40 cases of myocarditis and other heart-related ailments in young people from the Pfizer vaccine.

At the time, Israel had a much higher vaccination rate than the US, the report noted.

About 10 days later, an FDA official drafted a response noting that “limitations of passive surveillance … [and] incomplete data make it challenging to assess causation.”

FDA plans to restrict annual COVID-19 shots to over-65s, officials say

US health officials requested more data from the Israelis.

By mid-April, a Defense Department contractor involved with the Pentagon’s work on immunization delivered a presentation to the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) working group that concluded “there is a high likelihood that cardiac symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination represent a hypersensitivity eosinophilic myocarditis.”

By this time, there had been more than 158 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis reported on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The following month, the COVID-19 vaccine was approved for adolescents, and members of VaST “felt that information about reports of myocarditis should be communicated to providers.”

Top health officials also began deliberating on releasing a draft National Health Alert Network (HAN) warning about myocarditis and pericarditis side effects from the vaccine.

“The pros and cons of an official HAN are what the main discussions are right now,” CDC official Dr. Sara Oliver wrote to Moderna on May 25, 2021. “I think it’s likely to be a HAN since that is the CDC’s primary method of communications to clinicians and public health departments, but people don’t want to appear alarmist either.”

About a day later, then-FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock wrote in an email to then-CDC director Rochelle Walensky that the FDA was opposed to blasting out the warning as drafted.

Other top health officials raised objections as well. Then-director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Peter Marks, expressed concerns that “myocarditis and pericarditis have not actually signaled.”

Another official raised concerns that the HAN was necessary because “messages have not been trickling from the vaccine programs to providers at large.”

Instead of issuing the HAN warning, the CDC put out a notice on its website on May 28, 2021, that there had been “increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis” reported in the US following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination from Pfizer and Moderna, but continued to recommend immunization for those ages 12 and up.

Internal Biden administration talking points from this time period described myocarditis from the COVID-19 vaccine as “rare” and had been circulated to top health brass.

“It is unclear, though, whether these talking points, which minimized the risk and harm of myocarditis, had any effect on the decision not to issue the HAN,” Johnson’s report noted.

By this point, the number of VAERS reports had spiked to 752 cases.

Then, on June 25, 2021, the FDA updated the labels on the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to note the risk of myocarditis and similar complications.

The report was made public one day after the FDA announced it was moving to tighten requirements for administering booster shots.

Johnson (R-Wis.) is the chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and has led multiple investigations into the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The full extent of the Biden administration’s failure to immediately warn the public about all COVID-19 vaccine adverse events must be completely exposed,” his report concluded.

“The American people fund the federal health departments and agencies with their hard-earned tax dollars. The information developed by these departments and agencies belongs to the American people.”

The Causal Link Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Death [VIDEO 1:04:20] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher Joins Dr. Idriss J. Aberkane to Present Autopsy Findings in Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccination

MAY 21, 2025

I joined Dr. Idriss J. Aberkane, PhD—a French polymath and triple doctorate holder in neuroscience, comparative literature, and the geopolitics of knowledge—for a critical conversation on the deeply concerning autopsy findings following COVID-19 vaccination. These post-mortem investigations reveal a clear causal link between the vaccines and death, with vaccine-derived mRNA and spike protein repeatedly detected in the vital organs of the deceased.

We reviewed the following key studies that shed critical light on the pathological consequences of COVID-19 vaccination:

Johns Hopkins Study of 1.9 Million Women Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Depopulate Frank Bergman

May 20, 2025

A major new study from world-renowned scientists at Johns Hopkins University has confirmed that Covid “vaccines” are reducing human populations by lowering birth rates.

The peer-reviewed study, led by Dr. Kunchok Dorjee, is the most comprehensive evaluation to date of the association between Covid “vaccination” and reproductive disturbances.

The massive investigation included a staggering 1.9 million women from around the world.

The team of researchers analyzed 17 individual global studies related to birth rates and menstrual cycles among women who had received mRNA injections.

The study warns of “significant risks” to women’s fertility and birth rates following Covid “vaccination,” aligning with previous warnings of “reproductive destruction” caused by the injections.

The findings of the study were published in PLOS ONE journal.

During the study, the researchers reviewed literature from January 2021 to November 2023, across Medline, Embase, and Web of Science.

They selected 17 studies meeting stringent inclusion criteria.

Outcomes assessed included changes in menstrual cycle length, heavier flow, intermenstrual bleeding, and post-menopausal bleeding.

A fixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted with Shore’s adjusted confidence intervals to account for heterogeneity.

The study included a total of 1,911,755 participants, with 7 prospective cohorts, 4 retrospective cohorts, and 5 cross-sectional.

The “vaccine” brands included were Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen (J&J), and AstraZeneca.

The women included in the study were mostly menstruating, non-pregnant, non-lactating women ages 18–50.

Slay the latest News for free!

The researcher also included three studies involving post-menopausal women.

The study found a 19% higher relative risk of increased menstrual cycle length following Covid “vaccination” (standardized risk ratio [sRR]: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11–1.26).

On average, the first vaccine dose was associated with a 0.34-day increase in cycle length.

The second dose is with a 0.62-day increase.

However, this effect was resolved by the second cycle post-vaccination, suggesting the change was temporary.

When analyzed by vaccine brand, Pfizer and Moderna were associated with a 15% increased risk of cycle lengthening (sRR: 1.15), AstraZeneca with a 27% increase (sRR: 1.27), and Janssen with a 69% increase (sRR: 1.69), though the latter was based on a relatively small sample (n = 751).

The study also evaluated changes in menstrual bleeding patterns.

Risk for heavier flow was not statistically significant.

Post-menopausal bleeding showed a 7% increase (sRR: 1.07) following both doses.

Intermenstrual bleeding increased by 16% after the first dose and 41% after the second.

While absolute increases in cycle length were under a day, the relative risk signals are consistent and brand-dependent, with higher risk following Janssen and AstraZeneca vaccines.

Notably, cycle disruptions appeared dose-responsive—more pronounced after the second dose—and transient, fading by the second menstrual cycle.

However, these results should not be dismissed as merely anecdotal.

The inclusion of over 1.3 million post-menopausal women and the observed uptick in post-menopausal bleeding, however slight, raises flags about broader immunological or endocrine effects.

Further, the study hints at a possible cumulative effect—one that doesn’t follow a linear dose-response model but suggests a threshold phenomenon, especially when multiple doses are given in a single cycle.

The news comes amid an explosive warning from Spain after a group of leading researchers confirmed that miscarriages are surging among Covid “vaccinated” women.

A recent peer-reviewed study, led by Professor Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco of the Universidad Europea de Valencia SLU, has found that Covid-vaccinated women had a higher rate of miscarriage if they had also contracted COVID-19.

Alarmingly, however, these findings were buried in the data of the study.

The main “Results” section of the study’s paper only chronicled how the “vaccinated” moms had fewer cold-like symptoms.

The researchers retrospectively examined a sample of 156 pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy between 2020 and 2022.

Of these, 45 women had received at least one Covid “vaccine” dose.

Among the vaccinated group, six women (13.3%) had miscarriages.

Five of the miscarriages occurred in women who were vaccinated in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.

Another five miscarriages were recorded among the larger group (111) of unvaccinated women, resulting in a miscarriage rate of 4.5%.

While downplaying the increased rate of child deaths, the study championed the Covid injection for successfully reducing the rates of pneumonia, vomiting, and headache.

However, the unexpectedly high miscarriage risk reported among early-pregnancy infections in “vaccinated” women cannot be dismissed.

Another recent study documented how Covid “vaccines” are reducing women’s lifelong egg supply, leading to infertility.

Although that study was compiled using Covid-vaccinated rats, experts warn that the same impact among humans is also likely.

In the “Conclusions” section, the study said:

“Our findings suggest that both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines may detrimentally impact ovarian reserve in rats, primarily through accelerated follicular loss and alterations in apoptotic pathways during folliculogenesis.

“Given these observations in a rat model, further investigations into the vaccines’ effects on human ovarian reserve are needed.”

Similar findings, coined “reproductive destruction,” were found in government data and reported on by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly of Daily Clout.

The growing body of evidence continues to show that the mass global “vaccination” campaign has led to reduced birth rates.

At the same time, global excess death rates have been skyrocketing over the past four years.

As experts have been warning, the human race may now be on the verge of a depopulation crisis.

In fact, it may have already begun.

Government Admits it Knew Covid Vax Shots Were Fraud – Pull Them Off the Market! – Karen Kingston [VIDEO 1:20:06]

“…the FDA was aware of the fraud that was reported . . . before it granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for its vaccine.”

MAY 20, 2025 Lioness of Judah Ministry

By Greg Hunter May 7, 2025

Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who is back with some grotesque news about what the US government knew about the CV19 bioweapon vax. They knew it was not safe at all, and the FDA also knew Pfizer committed fraud to get the CV19 injections approved.

Kingston says, “This is the government’s words exactly: ‘The FDA was aware of the protocol violations.’ So, the FDA was aware of the fraud that was reported . . . before it granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for its vaccine. They were aware of the fraud.

Second, the government said it ‘had continued access’ to the Pfizer vaccine clinical data, and ‘in the FDA’s view, Pfizer’s vaccine is effective.’ Notice they dropped the word ‘safe.’ The minimum bar is safe before effective, but they intentionally dropped the word safe. . . . They ignored safety. For the last five or six years, the FDA’s mantra has been to sacrifice safety and disregard disabilities, disease and death that vaccines and gene editing products cause in children and adults in the name of science. . . .

They (FDA) had access to the data, and my point is the whole immunity (for Pfizer) is null and void because they co-conspired to commit fraud by withholding safety information of willful injury battery and murder of adults and children. Under the vaccine law, it says the manufacturer shall not be held liable for punitive damages unless they are engaged in fraud or intentional withholding information. . . or other criminal or illegal activity relating to the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.”

The government and Pfizer knew the CV19 vaccines were not safe. Kingston says, “In 2020, they met and listed out Myocarditis. Pericarditis, neurological malfunctions, respiratory failure, multiple system inflammatory disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and they listed everything out except for cancer.

So, they knew the CV19 vax would cause all those debilitating injuries, infertility and death. . . . Taking the CV19 shots off the childhood vaccine schedule is not enough. These shots, by definition, according to President Trump’s Executive Order yesterday, are dangerous bioweapons. That’s what these shots are, and you can go through President Trump’s criteria, and they meet that criteria. So, these shots need to be taken off the market and not be found in any community in the United States of America, or in any community around the world at this point. . . .

The information has been there. It’s been in our face, and we have gone along with being gaslit and saying the Trump Administration doesn’t know, and once they know, they will make a change. Well, the Trump Administration, our current Administration, just put in writing, yeah, we know the CV19 vax is fraud. We don’t care, and we are not changing our mind. That’s a tough pill to swallow.”

In closing, Kingston points out they want to put so-called mRNA in everything to fight cancer, but all the studies for the past several decades on mRNA say it causes cancer.

Kingston says, “Pfizer is telling us we are putting in faulty genes. We are debilitating you. We are disabling you. We are sterilizing you, and we are killing you. We are directing the evolution of human beings to become more weak and more dependent on us. . . . To survive, you will need us. It’s on their website. It’s called ‘directed evolution.’ They are directing the extinction of our species. That is what this is. They are playing God. . . .You can call it eugenics. You can call it depopulation, but the new word is ‘directed evolution.’ It’s mRNA technology or personalized medicine, it’s all the same thing.”

There is more in the 80-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with renowned biotech analyst Karen Kingston as she uncovers pure evil with the approval of the deadly and debilitating mRNA CV19 bioweapon vax that has yet to be pulled from the market by the new HHS Secretary RFK Jr. and President Trump.

WATCH [1:20:06]

PHARMAFIA HIT: DOCTOR RASHID BUTTAR MURDERED. Controversial Death of a Medical Dissident. RIP. May 18 2023. [24:24] AMALYA

Rashid said “Fauci will have killed more than the Holocaust.” Now he is dead.

MAY 20, 2025 GROWTHFACTOR.ORG

CLICK IMAGE ABOVE TO WITNESS DR BUTTAR’S FINAL WORDS ON HOW HE WAS MURDERED [24:24]

This article was co-written by retired Doctor Robert Yoho. He brought DMSO and Chlorine Dioxide back into the forefront of the minds of the public and famous doctors. Click here to subscribe to his substack, your life will change and your health improve. I am blessed to call him “friend.”

Click here to witness the final words of Doctor Rashid Buttar via a video I made on X. Doctor Buttar explains in his own words how he was murdered. My X account was destroyed by PharMafia, please follow me here to fight this evil! Follow on Rumble here.

INITIALLY, DOCTOR BUTTAR FELT HE BECAME DEATHLY SICK DUE TO COVID SHOT “SHEDDING.” AFTER BEING TESTED, HE DISCOVERED HE WAS POISONED AT 200 TIMES THE DOSE, A HIT WAS MADE ON HIS LIFE

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Silenced Voice Against Medical Establishment. The Controversial Death of a Medical Dissident

Dr. Rashid Buttar died on May 18, 2023, under circumstances his supporters believe were far from natural. Evidence suggests he was deliberately poisoned following his public criticisms of Anthony Fauci and the covid19 vaccination program. As the headline to my blog states, “PHARMAFIA HIT: DOCTOR RASHID BUTTAR WAS MURDERED FOR SAYING FAUCI WILL HAVE KILLED MORE THAN HITLER DUE TO COVID SHOTS. RIP. May 18 2023. ¹

Despite never taking any covid shots himself, toxicology reports revealed his body contained substances similar to those in the covid injections at approximately 200 times the normal dose.² This finding supports the theory that his death was not accidental but a targeted elimination of a vocal critic of pharmaceutical interests.

Prior to his death, Dr. Buttar made the striking claim that Fauci will have killed more than Hitler due to covid shots.³ This provocative statement compared the potential long-term casualties of the global vaccination campaign to historical atrocities. His prediction centered on widespread health complications he believed would follow the mass administration of mRNA technology, which he characterized as an “unprecedented global experiment on human subjects.”

Days before his passing, Dr. Buttar offered a philosophical perspective on mortality, stating, in my own summary, “Weep not for those that pass away, be happy for them, for they are back with The Divine Creator, in Heaven, Back Home. Rather, weep for the babies born unto this world.” This sentiment reflected his growing concern about the future health prospects of coming generations.

Medical Warnings and Professional Persecution

Dr. Buttar belonged to a coalition of medical professionals who questioned mainstream pandemic narratives, including Doctor Robert Scott Bell, Doctor Bryan Ardis, Del Bigtree, Dr Judy Mikovits, Dr David Martin, Dr Lee Merritt, Dr Brian Hooker, Dr Ed Group, Dr Henry Ealy, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Dr Quillin, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Sherri Tenpenny, Ty and Charlene Bollinger. This network of physicians and health advocates challenge prevailing medical orthodoxy regarding vaccination safety and efficacy.

His warnings extended beyond covid19 vaccines to traditional vaccines like MMR (measles, mumps, rubella). Dr. Buttar knew specific sections of vaccine inserts, and that all shots “shed and spread’ the disease that was injected, proof is here in section 5.6 of the FDA MMR shot particularly focusing on GSK brand MMR product insert. Here I highlight section 6.1, which lists potential MMR shot side effects including febrile convulsions, meningeal irritation, which he interpreted as acknowledging links to autism. Section 6.2 details additional risks including; thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopenic purpura, vascular disorders, vasculitis (including Henoch-Schönlein purpura and Kawasaki syndrome), immune system disorders, meningitis, measles-like illness, mumps-like illness (including orchitis, epididymitis, parotitis), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, arthralgia, arthritis, nervous system disorders, encephalitis, cerebellitis, cerebellitis-like symptoms (including transient gait disturbance and transient ataxia), Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, peripheral neuritis, afebrile seizures, syncope, skin and subcutaneous tissue Disorders, erythema multiforme.

Holocaust survivor and human rights activist Vera Sharav aligned with Dr. Buttar’s concerns, drawing parallels between historical human experimentation and contemporary mass vaccination campaigns. As she explains, “NEVER AGAIN IS NOW, this time the human experiment is global. Her documentary, “Never Again Is Now Global (2023) echoes Dr. Buttar’s warnings against “incorporating children into pharmaceutical trials. Both viewed the covid19 response as a troubling continuum of institutional overreach reminiscent of dark historical precedents.

I WILL LEAVE THIS HERE FOR YOU TO PONDER

These are the 8 cancer researchers who died in a plane “crash” in Brazil. They were investigating the links between mRNA injections and turbo cancer and wanted to publish their work, they were on their way to a press conference!

Personal Experience and Prophetic Warnings

I credit Doctor Buttar with saving the life of my entire family, that includes my elderly parents who already had covid, prior to the shot availability.⁸ His guidance reinforced our decision to avoid participating in what he termed a “global experiment with mRNA technology.” He emphasized that never in the history of vaccines did a body need a shot for disease, after contracting that disease!⁹

My first encounter with Dr. Buttar occurred in May 2019 at a health conference in Pasadena, California. I attended with my eldest son, who initially harbored skepticism but ultimately found value in the information presented. The speakers warned us, “Forced vaccines are coming, vaccine passports may be linked to your REAL ID, do not apply for it. Soon you will not be able to get on a plane, eat in a restaurant, nor attend school.”¹⁰ The conference featured speakers Dr. Bruce Lipton, Nia Peeples, Dr. Robert Scott Bell, Del Bigtree, Quillin, Bollinger, and Bernhoft, who collectively warned about impending vaccine mandates and restrictions.

I initially dismissed these predictions as paranoid, thinking these people were a bit nutty. I had worked for Merck Pharmaceuticals, launching many drugs, my own children are fully vaccinated.¹ However, nine months later, as pandemic restrictions emerged, I recognized the accuracy of these forecasts, which significantly altered my perspective on institutional medical authority.

Personal Transformation Through Tragedy

Dr. Buttar’s medical skepticism stemmed partly from personal tragedy. When his son Avi developed autism, Dr. Buttar experienced profound anger toward God, eventually transforming this emotion into a spiritual commitment. When one of Rashid’s 3 sons, Avi Buttar, became autistic, Buttar was extremely angry at The Creator, eventually making a deal that he would do God’s work until his last breath, speak the truth, be unafraid. ¹² I conducted an interview with Avi at his father’s May 2019 conference, (see image below) then approximately 20 years old, who shared his experience of autism and his eventual recovery through his father’s therapeutic interventions. Avi developed into a fully normal, functioning young man, no sign of anything.¹

In December 2022, five months before his death, Dr. Buttar described experiencing a near-death experience during which he claimed to communicate directly with God. Despite wishing to remain in what he described as a realm of perfect love, he reported being told it was not yet his time, as he had more work to complete on Earth. Although he wished to remain in that realm, God informed him it was not his time, he had more work to do.¹⁴ This spiritual experience reinforced his mission to warn the public about what he perceived as medical dangers, with a specific divine instruction to, “Tell them, NOW is the time to exert your free will.”¹⁵

Dr. Buttar faced significant media criticism, including a confrontational CNN interview that portrayed him as nuts, a conspiracy theorist, misinformation spreader.¹⁶ Buttar warned covid vaccinations would lead to; sudden deaths, heart/lung issues, tinnitus, inflammation, sight issues, turbo cancers and autoimmune issues.¹⁷ When the CNN reporter died 14 months after of cancer, Dr. Buttar expressed genuine sorrow despite their adversarial interaction. Griffin said to Buttar, “I think you are crazy!”

Why all these “sudden deaths” in or near the water? MARK CRISPIN MILLER

This macabre trend may hold some clue as to WHY people are dying in such numbers.

MAY 19, 2025

Further indications of the global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers.

Here are 40+ items on mysterious drownings worldwide—“mysterious” because, in many cases, (1) a significant number of the decedents were not in the water, but near it, on a beach or riverbank or lakeside; (2) the waters that overwhelmed the decedent were often calm, and sometimes shallow (one died in a hot tub); and (3) the swimmers were often experienced and fit.

Now, according to the CDC, there are between 3,000 the 4,000 such drownings—many “mysterious”—or 11 such deaths per day. But those stats raise some questions. Although the press release below is dated May 14 of this year, the CDC’s numbers refer only to drownings that occurred between 2020 and 2022.

Second, the CDC’s study found, or asserts, that “[d]rowning is the number one cause of death for children 1-4 years old in the United States. Today’s study shows that drowning rates were highest among this age group.” As the reports below make clear, however, only a relative few of those largely inexplicable drownings involved children, while the great majority referred to decedents of all ages.

Finally, can we accept as true the assertion that the number of extra drowning deaths is “only” 500? And what about the global toll? Finally, why should we believe that the number of drownings worldwide has not been deceptively understated? After all, few governments would not participate; and those that didn’t, or wouldn’t, had their presidents somehow die prematurely (rather like Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, and was quite vocal about its diagnostic uselessness, and who was scathing on the subject of Dr. Fauci).

In any case, the spike in “mysterious” drownings is global (except for those parts of the world that have no bodies of water)

Take Switzerland:

Spike Protein Found in Female Stroke Victims Up to 17 Months After Receiving mRNA COVID Vaccine by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Extremely concerning!

MAY 09, 2025

This article originally appeared on The Defender and was republished with permission.

Researchers found the spike protein inside the cerebral arteries, which flow to the brain. The study confirmed that, in all of the patients, some of the spike protein detected originated from the COVID-19 vaccines.

Spike protein was detected in the organs of nearly half — all women — of stroke victims up to 17 months after they received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, according to a new peer-reviewed study.

The study confirmed that, in all of the patients, some of the spike protein detected originated from the COVID-19 vaccines. None of the patients had an active COVID-19 infection at the time of their stroke.

The study by 10 Japanese researchers retrospectively examined the cases of 19 hemorrhagic stroke victims from 2023 and 2024 to investigate the potential link between the strokes and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Spike protein was found in the tissue and organs of 43.8% of the 19 stroke victims examined. All the patients in the 43.8% group were women.

Researchers found the spike protein inside the cerebral arteries, which flow to the brain. In one patient, spike protein was present 17 months after vaccination, while in two others, the protein was detected 12 and 11 months following vaccination, respectively.

The researchers said the findings “raise significant concerns” about the long-term safety of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

They cited the role of lipid nanoparticles, which deliver mRNA to human cells, in contributing to the risk of stroke.

“These findings raise significant concerns regarding the biodistribution of lipid nanoparticle-based vaccines and their long-term safety,” the study authors wrote.

The study appeared in the June edition of the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

Christof Plothe, D.O., a member of the World Council for Health steering committee, said the study’s findings align with broader reports of “sex-specific vaccine complications, including menstrual disruptions and myocarditis.”

‘An exceptionally long-lasting vaccination effect’

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense, said 17, 12 and 11 months is “an exceptionally long-lasting vaccination effect.”

“Spike-protein and immune response to it lasting 17 months after vaccination is a big deal and a big problem,” Jablonowski said. “It means the assault on the body of the vaccinated and the adverse effects of it may exist in perpetuity, forever.”

Other studies have found that lipid nanoparticles deliver DNA contaminants, contained within mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, throughout the body.

Plothe said the study results contradict claims that the spike protein’s presence in the body would remain localized to the vaccination site and last only for a brief period.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claims that after mRNA enters muscle cells following COVID-19 vaccination, the cells’ machinery is used “to produce a harmless piece of what is called the spike protein.” The protein’s presence then “triggers our immune system to produce antibodies and activate other immune cells to fight off what it thinks is an infection.”

“Any side effects from getting the vaccine are normal signs the body is building protection,” the CDC claims.

But for Plothe, the prolonged presence of spike protein “raises serious questions about the long-term behavior of mRNA technology in the human body.”

“While the study does not definitively prove causation, the detection of spike protein in brain arteries — combined with signs of immune cell infiltration — suggest a plausible mechanism for blood vessel damage and hemorrhagic strokes,” Plothe said.

Rapid approval of COVID shots ‘left critical gaps’ in safety data

According to the study, clinical trials for the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated their “short-term safety and efficacy.” However, the long-term effects and biodistribution of the vaccines “remain underexplored.”

Plothe said the lack of long-term safety data for the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is “troubling,” adding that the accelerated approval process for these “left critical gaps in our understanding of these vaccines’ delayed effects.”

Despite a lack of long-term safety data, what we do know about the effects of spike proteins on the body is troubling, Plothe said.

“The potential consequences of lingering spike protein are severe and multifaceted. Chronic inflammation, clotting disorders, and autoimmune reactions could emerge over time, posing risks that were never adequately assessed during clinical trials,” Plothe said.

She added that multiple studies and autopsy reports have shown that mRNA vaccines can cause vascular and neurological damage.

Writing on Substack, epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher referenced a recent study in Nature Biotechnology, which found that mRNA vaccination in mice resulted in spike protein expression “in critical organs, including the liver, spleen, lungs, heart, head, and kidneys.”

“Unfortunately, this appears to also be the case in humans,” Hulscher wrote.

A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science in November 2024 found that COVID-19 vaccines pose a 112,000% greater risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines, and a 20,700% greater risk of those symptoms than all other vaccines combined.

In February, Yale University researchers published a preprint showing that spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine was detected in the blood of at least one person 709 days after vaccination — a significantly longer time than previously measured.

A study published last month in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease found that young adults who received a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine showed elevated spike protein production a year or more after vaccination.

According to the authors of the new study, “Global replication studies are urgently required to validate these findings and ensure comprehensive safety evaluations of mRNA vaccines.”

Plothe said the new study adds to “a growing body of evidence” of harm caused by mRNA vaccines, and contributes to calls for their suspension or withdrawal.

“Given the unresolved safety concerns and the availability of alternative solutions, a global moratorium on these vaccines is urgently needed,” Plothe said. “Independent, transparent research must take precedence to determine whether the risks outweigh any purported benefits — before more lives are irrevocably harmed,” Plothe said.

Related articles in The Defender

The Other Side of the Vaccine Story They Never Wanted You to Hear The Vigilant Fox

Before your child’s next check-up, you need to read this.

MAY 19, 2025 – The following information is based on a report originally published by A Midwestern Doctor. Key details have been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.

Before COVID, most parents never thought twice about vaccines.

They didn’t know the HPV vaccine could raise cancer risk by 44.6% in women with existing infections.

Or that 491,000 children in India were paralyzed after a mass polio vaccination campaign funded by Bill Gates.

This is the vaccine breakdown they never wanted you to see.

Upgrade to paid

The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher

A Midwestern Doctor. For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full article below.

Biowarfare 2025 Plans Revealed ft. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny [57:44] THE VIGILANT FOX

And once you start connecting the dots, a disturbing picture begins to emerge.

MAY 18, 2025

Singapore just made it a CRIME to refuse a vaccination, threatening jail time and massive fines for saying “no.”

Strangely, that law passed right AFTER Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab paid a visit.

Coincidence? Or something more?

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny believes this is a clue that another “pandemic” is on the horizon.

And once you start connecting the dots, a disturbing picture begins to emerge.

Let’s break it down.

Could another “pandemic” really be coming soon?

Most people believe we’ve wised up since COVID. But what if the next outbreak is far more terrifying—one where people start bleeding from their eyes, nose, or ears?

That’s exactly the kind of fear Dr. Sherri Tenpenny says could be weaponized next.

A shocking law was just passed in Singapore, making it illegal to refuse vaccination.

“You have to vaccinate [during outbreaks] or you’re going to get six months in jail and up to $5,000 in fines,” Dr. Tenpenny warned.

If that’s not enough, “the next ratchet up is up to one year in jail and $10,000 or $20,000 in fines.” There’s no way out—not even for medical reasons. “If you’re a citizen of Singapore and they tell you you need to take this, you have no choice.”

Tenpenny also found it interesting that this “started right after Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates made a visit to Singapore.”

She believes this may be a “prototype law” ready to roll out globally when the next fear campaign begins—possibly triggered by a hemorrhagic virus like Ebola or NEPA.

In April, the U.S. government received a chilling report called the National Blueprint for Biodefense.

It lays out what would happen if a bioterrorist released NEPA virus, a hemorrhagic pathogen.

Dr. Tenpenny is asking the obvious: “Why are documents being presented to the White House for this?”

She believes COVID didn’t achieve the desired outcome. Now, a darker playbook may be unfolding—one that ramps up fear, tightens control, and finishes what the last pandemic started.

Maria Zeee highlighted the disturbing trend in Moderna’s pipeline.

The company is developing mRNA shots for RSV, flu, HIV, Zika, NEPA, Mpox, and even cancer.

They’re calling these “public health vaccines,” but as Maria Zeee pointed out, “if we know how dangerous the COVID shots were… why are we still cooperating with companies who are developing more of this technology?”

Despite mounting injuries and even mainstream media acknowledgments, Moderna keeps expanding, with no accountability in sight.

The FDA Just Approved Another COVID Vaccine — But RFK Jr. Has Already Intervened

Emergency notification: methylene blue is highly neurotoxic to your brain and mind DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN

Methylene blue is a Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor (MAOI). As such, it is one of the most toxic agents ever used in medicine and psychiatry, and the mother of the most dangerous drugs used in psychiatry

MAY 18, 2025

In reality, methylene blue is a lethal neurotoxin, a poison to the brain. [Emphasis added] It has the same basic chemical composition and harmful clinical effects as the oldest and most neurotoxic “antidepressants,” the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). It also has similarities to the neurotoxic phenothiazine “antipsychotic” drugs, including the original Thorazine (chlorpromazine), but methylene blue is more stimulating or activating.

Methylene blue is not a miraculous new discovery. It’s the opposite. Created in 1876 in a lab, it is the oldest manmade chemical to be used in medicine. But for well over a century, methylene blue has never been FDA-approved for psychiatric purposes. Later, its chemical structure was modified in labs to create many of the earliest, most neurotoxic psychiatric drugs.

Methylene blue is widely marketed over the counter to the general public as well as to the natural health, health freedom, and freedom communities, often on the internet. It’s flooding America.

Some sellers are touting methylene blue as a “miracle” tonic that improves “cognitive function”¹ and boosts energy to previously unimagined heights. Some have given live demonstrations on TV and podcasts demonstrating how the oral form hyperactivates some people within 35 minutes of the first dose — a typical stimulant drug rush—which is actually a danger signal for potentially activating them into a dangerous manic episode during future exposures or even more deadly outcomes.

Methylene blue suppresses or destroys forms of the enzyme monoamine oxidase that are used by the brain for controlling or modulating four different powerful neurotransmitters — serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. In short, by crushing monoamine oxidase, methylene blue causes overstimulation of four of the brain’s major neurotransmitters, all of which profoundly impact the mind.

After the FDA was created in 1906, methylene blue was grandfathered into the market by the agency as an obscure antidote for methemoglobinemia, but it must be emphasized that the FDA has never tested the safety of methylene blue for any purpose. Furthermore, the FDA, based on its adverse reporting system and scientific reports, has published serious warnings about potentially lethal adverse reactions from methylene blue, especially when combined with numerous other drugs.²

The first MAOIs used as depressants were derived from methylene blue, and they turned out to be so toxic that the first two were quickly taken off the market by the FDA. One caused lethal liver disease, and the other caused hypertensive crises. Methylene blue is known to impair liver function tests and to cause hypertensive crises. Early on, all MAOIs were removed for a while from the international list of approved drugs. Please go to this endnote in my report for a list of historical and scientific studies about the extraordinary history and the nature of methylene blue and the other MAOIs.³

Psychiatry and the psychopharmaceutical complex are so driven to impose neurotoxins upon our brains that some MAOI antidepressants remain on the market today. FDA Full Prescribing Information for the existing MAOI antidepressants, readily available online,⁴ provides quick access to the kinds of adverse effects caused by methylene blue. These FDA documents also provide lists of the foods and of some of the many, many drugs you cannot take with MAOIs, like methylene blue, without risking death from serotonin syndrome or a hypertensive crisis.

Meanwhile, all of America is being made a market for the original mother of them all, methylene blue, without requiring a prescription, with bizarrely distorted claims, and with unlimited supplies handed out as easily as a new caffeinated soda.

All of the three approved MAOIs, as well as methylene blue, carry repeated warnings at the FDA and in the scientific community about causing the two potentially crippling and lethal outcomes, serotonin syndrome and malignant hypertension (see below). These potentially lethal outcomes, as with all MAOIs, become much more serious and higher risk when methylene blue is taken with certain foods such as cheese and bananas, or literally with so many other drugs that it is impossible to memorize them or to keep track of them.

Here is one version of a short summary of the long list of dangerous interactions between MAOIs, including methylene blue, and other drugs and foods, taken from Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (2018, p. 274):

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors

Serotonin syndrome is the most serious drug interaction for the MAOIs (see Adverse Effects). The most common cause of serotonin syndrome in patients taking MAOIs is the accidental co-administration of a SHT reuptake-inhibiting antidepressant or tryptophan. Other serious drug interactions include those with meperidine and tramadol. MAOIs also interact with sympathomimetics such as pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, oxymetazoline, phenylpropanolamine, and amphetamine; these are commonly found in cold and allergy medication and diet aids and should be avoided by patients taking MAOIs. Likewise, patients on MAOIs must avoid foods containing high levels of tyramine: soy products, dried meats and sausages, dried fruits, home-brewed and tap beers, red wine, pickled or fermented foods, and aged cheeses.

I am presenting this detailed summary in the hope of gaining the immediate attention of people and businesses who are promoting methylene blue and anyone who is unfortunately taking it. Please share this summary or the entire document as widely as possible and with proper attribution.

This article continues with my professional experience in psychopharmacology, followed by a lengthy scientific analysis with more than two dozen endnotes containing an even greater number of scientific citations.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Podcast Index | RSS

Listen to the podcast on this story here: Emergency notification for methylene blue! It’s highly neurotoxic to your brain and mind

Editor’s note: This column is too long for email—to read the entire column please click on the headline above or click here to go to the Breggins’ Substack and this complete column.

My Background in Psychopharmacology Related to Analyzing Methylene Blue

In presenting this emergency notice on the dangers of methylene blue, I am drawing on a lifetime of professional work, starting with my own published animal laboratory research while a medical student.⁵ My research demonstrated for the first time that exposures of animals to intramuscular adrenaline (a combination of epinephrine and norepinephrine) might give initial activation or stimulation, but that more prolonged exposure over a few minutes or hours made the animals sedated, exhausted, sluggish, or blunted for the duration of their drug exposure. I hypothesized that a feedback mechanism to the hypothalamus caused a compensatory reaction that slowed down the brain and made the animals sluggish.

Methylene blue is in the biochemical and clinical classification of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) used as “antidepressants,” but it has no FDA testing for safety! It has all the same hazards as the FDA-approved MAOIs for depression and is probably biochemically more harmful or neurotoxic. It is made even more dangerous in the manner in which it is sold, marketed without medical supervision as a powder or liquid, with unlimited doses made available at once, and with enormously unrealistic expectations and no extensive warnings.

Since becoming a psychiatrist, I have written many scientific papers and many books⁶ showing how human beings who take psychiatric drugs sometimes are initially stimulated when the drug over-activates the monoamine neurotransmitters, including epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine; but eventually, similar to the animals, the human drug recipients typically become more subdued, apathetic, or disengaged from their own feelings, those around them, and with life itself.

DEBUNKED: “Millions Saved” COVID-19 Vaccine Study Torn to Shreds [VIDEO 24:34] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

Dr. Raphael Lataster’s new meta-critique exposes the flawed math, false assumptions, and hidden conflicts behind the infamous “14 million lives saved” vaccine claim.

MAY 18, 2025

In this revealing episode, epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher sits down with Dr. Raphael Lataster to dismantle the widely cited Watson et al study, published in The Lancet, which claimed COVID-19 vaccines saved 14.4 million lives in a single year.

Dr. Lataster presents his rigorous meta-critique published in the Journal of Independent Medicine, exposing the study’s deeply flawed assumptions, hidden conflicts of interest, and misleading methodology:

Key Points

False Vaccine Effectiveness Claims
Watson et al. used exaggerated estimates of vaccine effectiveness, derived from flawed clinical trial data that ignored adverse events and misclassified cases in “partially vaccinated” individuals—artificially inflating efficacy.
Static Vaccine Assumptions
The study assumed constant vaccine protection (e.g., 90% against disease) over time, despite clear real-world evidence showing rapid waning effectiveness—which turns negative after several months.
Manipulated IFR/CFR Inputs
The paper relied on inflated infection fatality rates (IFRs) and was non-transparent about their sources—likely overestimating the deadliness of COVID-19 to make vaccine impact appear larger.
No Risk-Benefit Analysis
Watson et al completely ignored vaccine risks—including myocarditis, deaths, and subclinical injury—rendering any benefit claims scientifically meaningless.
Garbage In, Garbage Out Modeling
The study was not based on real-world outcomes but on speculative modeling riddled with biased inputs, unrealistic assumptions, and circular logic.
Massive Conflicts of Interest
The lead authors and funding bodies have extensive ties to vaccine manufacturers, the WHO, GAVI, and the Gates Foundation. The team operated under the leadership of Neil Ferguson—infamous for his failed pandemic models and lockdown advocacy.
Excess Deaths Correlate with Vaccination
Dr. Lataster shared findings from his other research showing a correlation between high vaccination rates and increased excess mortality and hospitalizations in multiple countries.

Florida BANNED Fluoride in public water supply. PETER IMANUELSEN

The sunshine state became the second in the USA to remove fluoride from public water.

MAY 18, 2025

So the mainstream media is freaking out once again.

This time because Ron DeSantis signed a bill making Florida the second state in the USA to ban adding fluoride to the public water supply.

In other words, this means that something good has happened.

A little while ago, I reported on how Utah became the first state to do this. Now Florida is following suit.

”Yes, use fluoride for your teeth, that’s fine, but forcing it in the water supply is basically forced medication on people” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said.

And it is true.

But here is the thing I don’t understand. Yes, we know that fluoride is effective in preventing caries. But why put it in water where people drink it? Surely the most effective way to use fluoride would be to use toothpaste or something similar – Not drinking it.

A new official government report found that fluoride can in fact affect IQ of children.

BOMBSHELL: Fluoride can lower IQ in children says new government report PETER IMANUELSEN

AUGUST 22, 2024

This should send shock waves all over the earth.

People were long called crazy conspiracy theorists for saying this, but more and more evidence is now coming out that fluoride can in fact have very bad side effects.

The WHO says the safe limit for fluoride in drinking water is 1.5mg per liter of water.

However, the new official government study found that people drinking water that contains more than 1.5mg of fluoride per liter was linked with lowering IQ by as much as 5 points in children!

In other words, fluoride is neurotoxic.

So why is this being put in the water supply, forcing people to ingest this in their body, not giving them a choice?

Again, you can use fluoride toothpaste which is then spit out, minimizing the amount of fluoride that is swallowed into the body.

The fluoride that is often used as additives in U.S drinking water is a chemical called hexaflurosilicic acid, something that is also used in rust remover products. This is a corrosive acid.

Paper straws SUCK – Contains TOXIC “forever chemicals” PETER IMANUELSEN

JANUARY 28, 2024

Remember how it was suddenly decided that we had to stop using plastic straws to save the environment?

There is now an alternative to fluoride also, something called hydroxyapatite, which studies have found to be around as effective at preventing caries as fluoride – But without any toxicity.

So why isn’t this being promoted more?

Is there some kind of agenda to make people dumber…?

Scientist Confirms White Clots Caused by Shots Are Infectious Amyloid [VIDEO 1:31:31]

“WE’RE NOW GOING TO BE DEALING WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE MASS EXPOSURE TO WEAPONIZED AMYLOIDS, EITHER THROUGH THE ‘VIRAL AGENT’ OR THROUGH THE ‘VACCINE’ & THE EXPRESSION OF THE SPIKE PROTEIN”

MAY 08, 2025 FORBIDDEN.NEWS

WATCH

Dr Kevin McCairn joins Maria Zeee with a high-level science presentation, with lots of electron microscope images of the mysterious white rubbery clots that morticians began discovering in the bodies of people all over the world after the COVID-19 injection mandates.

In Dr McCairn’s analysis, these strange white clots are infectious amyloids and he hypothesizes that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein present in both the ‘viral agent’ and the injections is a broad-acting amyloidogenic attack weapon.

He says the narratives about “viruses aren’t real” and “the shots are full of nanobots” are being seeded by the perpetrators, who want to distract you from finding the data, “That they fired toxic amyloids at everyone. There’s no little nanobots. I’ve shown that – I’ve scanned [with an electron microscope] dozens and dozens of vials. There’s no graphene oxide. Nothing, OK? It’s the toxic products of these programs that have done this. There is scientific data that you can follow, it is reproducible.

“We’ve got to find a solution to the amyloid problem and people have been trying to that for decades and we haven’t made much progress.”

He tells Maria Zeee:

“The important thing people need to take away from this interview is that these misfolded peptides, we now know are implicated, not just in neurodegeneration but also cancer.

“Because of this particular peptide being a blood peptide, it’s going to be tied to cardiovascular and thrombotic events.

“And the disease burden – again, this is for somebody designing a weapon – it’s dispersed, chaotic and most people are going to have a job tying it back to something as abstract as what I’m showing you on the screen, here.”

Amyloids are formerly healthy proteins that have become degenerate and that are deposited as plaques in the brain, causing dementia.

Prions are infectious amyloids that induce surrounding proteins to likewise misfold and to degenerate, causing horrifying diseases, like Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis (“Mad Cow Disease”) and its human analog, Creuzfeldt-Jakob.

All prions are amyloids but not all amyloids are prions. He says there’s a spectrum of infectivity among prions, with scrapie being the most dangerous. There have been discussions as to whether the amyloids of Parkinsons and Azheimer’s are infectious and whether there should be precautions taken during autopsies, etc. but the consensus, so far is just to “be careful”.

Unlike other infectious agents, such as bacteria and fungi, prions do not contain DNA or RNA. Prions are proteins that infect other proteins, at the molecular level.

Dr McCairn says, “We’re now going to be dealing with the consequences of the mass exposure to weaponized amyloids, either through the ‘viral agent’ or through…the ‘vaccine’ and the expression of the spike protein.”

The next question is, would exposure to COVID clots be capable of seeding and catalyzing an amylodogenic cascade? and he says the preliminary data says “There seems to be something we should be looking at, right now.”

Maria Zee and Dr McCairn are joined by Richard Hirschman, who was the first mortician to come forward with samples of these huge, rubbery COVID clots, such as these:

Dr McCairn cites the December 2021 scientific paper, “Subcutaneous Uptake on [18F]Florbetaben PET/CT: a Case Report of Possible Amyloid-Beta Immune-Reactivity After COVID-19 Vaccination” by Riccardo Laudicella et al., which he says should have set off alarm bells and stopped the vaccine roll-out, right then and there but he says many tenured and well-paid professionals knew better said nothing.

Major Study Exposes Severe Autoimmune Damage in Covid-Vaxxed Children Frank Bergman

May 17, 2025

A major new study has exposed chilling new evidence showing that Covid mRNA “vaccines” caused severe autoimmune damage in children who received the injections.

The findings have sent shockwaves through the scientific community, with leading experts now warning the shots are “clearly” dangerous for children.

The peer-reviewed retrospective cohort study was conducted at Maccabi Healthcare Services in Israel.

The team of researchers was led by renowned pediatrician Cynthia Freiberg.

The findings of the study were published May 14 in the journal Pediatric Rheumatology

During the study, the researchers analyzed medical records of nearly half a million children.

They sought to investigate whether COVID-19 infection or Covid vaccination increased the risk of autoimmune diseases.

The peer-reviewed study found no overall increase in autoimmune diagnoses during the pandemic.

Nor did they find a significant link between SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection and new-onset autoimmune conditions in children.

However, the researchers did observe a 23% increased relative risk of autoimmune disease following Covid mRNA vaccination (HR 1.2323, p = 0.0033).

The study’s strength lies in its scale.

The researchers followed 493,705 children across three periods (2014–2022).

The study also had access to comprehensive, real-world health data.

The findings have provoked a wave of alarm from leading experts.

McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher issued an alert to warn that the findings provide evidence showing that Covid mRNA injections “clearly” endanger children.

Hulscher declared that “COVID-19 infection posed no measurable autoimmune risk to children—but COVID-19 vaccines do.”

The study has emerged following another recent warning about the impact of Covid shots on immune systems.

A world-renowned toxicologist has warned that millions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” have been impacted by a devastating injury, including himself.

The chilling warning was issued by the associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Western Australia, Dr. Phil Burcham.

In a blistering critique published in the May 2025 edition of the journal Quadrant, Burcham raises urgent questions about the chemical design and safety testing of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Drawing upon firsthand injury experience, insider pharmaceutical literature, and decades of toxicological science, Burcham alleges that the deployment of mRNA-LNP technologies ignored well-known formulation risks.

The Covid mRNA injections also exposed patients to unvalidated toxic excipients and sidestepped rigorous preclinical evaluation, he argues.

Burcham contends that serious and rapid-onset toxicities experienced by Covid-vaccinated people stem not solely from immune responses to spike protein but from the synthetic materials used to construct LNP delivery systems.

The top professor notes that his own debilitating trigeminal nerve injury was caused by a Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

The findings come amid growing calls that the mRNA “vaccines” should be pulled for children, as well as pregnant and lactating women.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) is calling for a ban on the use Covid mRNA “vaccines” for children and pregnant women over soaring deaths and injuries among the “vaccinated.”

The physician-led nonprofit focused on medical freedom and transparency has launched a national petition campaign titled Smart Moms Ask.

The campaign seeks to pressure U.S. health agencies to remove mRNA “vaccines” from the childhood immunization schedule and prohibit their use in infants, children, and pregnant women.

It comes amid reports that President Donald Trump’s administration is preparing to remove the injections from the recommended shots for pregnant women, teenagers, and children.

The plan to remove the shots from the recommended routine was revealed by unnamed sources quoted by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

“The Department of Health and Human Services, led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is expected to remove the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations for those groups around the same time it launches a new framework for approving vaccines, the people said,” the WSJ reported.

The CDC’s current official recommendation is that everyone six months and older, including pregnant women, should receive Covid “vaccines.”

However, the halt on this recommendation is expected “in the coming days,” according to the WSJ.

The CDC and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must declare the “vaccines” unsafe for these cohorts, at the very least.

The Life-Saving Cure Big Pharma Desperately Tried to Bury [1:23:48] Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

Hospitals refused it. The media erased it. But the results are impossible to ignore. Patients who should have died walked away healthy. And the doctors who dared speak up paid the price.

How Political Meddling Threatens Your Health and Medical Freedom

May 18, 2025

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Doctors who successfully used early COVID-19 treatments like ivermectin faced severe backlash and censorship from medical and government authorities
Hospitals repeatedly blocked effective interventions, putting patients at unnecessary risk by ignoring treatments that could have prevented severe illness
Over 38,000 deaths linked to COVID shots were reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), yet health authorities downplayed these numbers
Health care professionals experienced threats to their medical licenses simply for advocating patient-centered treatments and sharing honest clinical results
Taking control of your medical freedom means knowing your rights, documenting your decisions, and actively choosing doctors who prioritize your health over politics

Trust in hospitals and health institutions is sharply declining because of how the health care industry has handled the COVID-19 pandemic. From forced treatments to draconic lockdown mandates, people all over the world suffered greatly. Even doctors who figured out effective treatments that helped save lives were vilified for spreading “misinformation.”

One such case is Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, a Texas-based physician who has treated COVID-19 patients during the height of the pandemic. During her time working in a hospital setting, she observed firsthand how patients recovered quickly using treatments such as ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies. All of this, and more, was discussed in her interview with Tucker Carlson featured above.

Why Vaccine Safety Suddenly Became a Political Battlefield

Getting vaccinated was once viewed as a straightforward part of health care. You’d go your doctor, get your shot, and move on with life, confident you’d done the right thing for your health. While many have criticized vaccinations and their adverse effects on human health, the arrival of the SARS-CoV-2 virus put the entire field under the watchful eyes of the public.

Now, getting the shot isn’t just a health care choice — it’s deeply entwined with politics. Doctors who tried treating their patients with methods outside the official rules faced intense backlash. Bowden shares her side of the story:

•Early treatment is crucial — Using drugs like ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies, she successfully helped thousands of patients recover quickly and fully. Recounting her experience in 2021:

“[M]onoclonal antibodies came about, and those worked great. I mean, I could get as many doses I wanted. I’d get them the next day. I’d just contact the manufacturer, say, I need 200 doses to be at my doorstep. Great. They worked wonderfully. People turned around very quickly.”

•Authorities pushed back against treatments that worked — One reason is that these early treatments undermined the vaccine-focused public health strategy. Powerful organizations insisted vaccines were the only real solution, dismissing alternatives. If patients could recover fully without the vaccine, fewer people would rush to get vaccinated, and Big Pharma wouldn’t like that.

“So this is following the rollout of the COVID shots. The government is upset because people are not buying it. People are not getting them. There’s very low uptake, very low interest. There’s suspicion of these shots,” Bowden says.

“So in March, they started their PR campaign. The government, they went after ivermectin. The FDA put something on their website about, you can’t use ivermectin for COVID. Biden doled out $11.5 billion to groups around the country. Initially, it started with 275.

It went up to 17,000 influencers, church groups, sports leagues, all sorts of people just funneling out taxpayer money to go after doctors like myself that were spreading ‘misinformation’ and to push people to get these COVID shots.”

Early Treatment Improves Outcomes, but Hospitals Denied It

The tragedy of COVID is how many lives were lost unnecessarily because early treatment was denied. Doctors learned quickly that COVID often became severe around day eight. If patients weren’t treated immediately, their chances of survival dropped significantly. But instead of acting early, many hospitals waited until patients became critically ill — by then, often too late.

•Bowden’s experiences illustrate the same tragedy — She tells the story of a sheriff’s deputy in Texas who became severely ill with COVID-19. His family begged the hospital to try ivermectin, a safe drug with decades of use.

“This is a man that has served for 29 years trying to protect and save the public. Father of six. And he contracted COVID. And this was in the fall of 2021. And that was the third and the largest surge of the pandemic. That’s when this was following the rollout of the COVID shots.

So, this was eight months following the rollout of COVID shots, and they clearly weren’t working. And this man, he got sick. He tried to get ivermectin. He couldn’t find a doctor willing to prescribe it. He ended up in the hospital, and he went downhill like so many people did,” Bowden said.

•Getting early treatment is crucial — Bowden noted that early treatment meant the difference between life and death. Patients treated early typically made a full recovery. She shares one story of a former patient:

“Everybody that got early treatment survived. I even had some really, really sick people come in in the second and third week. So, second, third week is when the inflammatory cascades set in and people get really sick.

I had a man come in with oxygen saturation in the 60s, and he was not a healthy guy. He had a history of a heart attack. He had a history of throat cancer. He was a veteran … But I had nurses that could do IVs, so we gave him high-dose steroids and IV.

We gave him antibiotics, breathing treatments, high-dose IV, vitamin C. We gave him high-dose ivermectin and we brought him in every day as an outpatient because I didn’t have a hospital bed in my office. He survived. And I had a lot [of patients] like that.”

•Only a few hospitals were open to lifesaving treatments — Bowden shared that Houston’s United Memorial Medical Center allowed ivermectin early on, saving countless lives. That’s because Dr. Joseph Varon, president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), worked there.

“This hospital, UMMC, allowed him to use ivermectin. There was a whole protocol called the MATH+ protocol, started by FLCCC, which is now Independent Medical Alliance.

It included high-dose steroids, high-dose ivermectin, high-dose vitamin C, breathing treatments — all these very basic, not dangerous things that weren’t being done elsewhere. He saved a lot of lives. He worked crazy hours — I think he worked over two and a half years straight without even a break. I was fortunate to have him as an ally,” she says.

Why would hospitals deny these treatments? The only answer that makes sense is profit. Hospitals received substantial funding tied specifically to following federal treatment guidelines, which did not include drugs like ivermectin. This funding was critical, outweighing patient care techniques that actually worked.

As noted earlier, Bowden has seen plenty of vaccine-related injuries firsthand. Many patients experienced symptoms they’d never had before, such as tremors, neurological problems, sudden heart issues, and severe fatigue. However, the system fought hard to suppress her right to free speech.

•Authorities are trying to silence Bowden by taking her license — Bowden, despite her successful patient outcomes, found herself portrayed as irresponsible or even dangerous. She shares with Carlson:

“I’m still fighting to keep my license. I mean, I still have the Texas Medical Board coming after me …”

•Big Tech amplified censorship — Companies who ran social media platforms banned doctors who spoke about their successful COVID treatments. Like many others, Bowden was banned from then-Twitter. Even Carlson has had to compromise with Big Tech to maintain his platform. He says:

“So, one of the primary platforms we use for distribution is YouTube, which, in general, has been great, actually, if I’m being honest. A lot less censorship than I got in any television job I ever had. So, we’re really grateful to YouTube. I never thought I’d say that.

But the one area where we get censored by YouTube is when we talk about COVID shots, which I think is really interesting. So, this will probably be censored on YouTube.”

•Safety data was supposed to be for the public’s protection — Instead, it was hidden or ignored. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has historically been a critical early warning system, and when adverse reactions spike, authorities usually pause or investigate the medication immediately. But during COVID, the huge surge in vaccine-related injuries prompted no action at all. Bowden shares her experience:

“According to VAERS, there have been 38,000 deaths from these COVID shots. So, under normal circumstances, the FDA would have pulled it, but instead they’ve doubled down. They put the shots on the childhood vaccine schedule. All babies are expected to get three COVID shots by the time they’re 9 months old.”

Take Control of Your Medical Freedom

Why is silencing a dissenting doctor a matter of concern? Because this puts your health at risk. When a doctor is unable to openly discuss innovative treatments, your ability to make informed health decisions will suffer.

If you’re concerned about how politics continue to interfere with health care practitioners, you’re not alone. Fortunately, there are ways for you to take control of your medical freedom. Here’s what I recommend you do to protect yourself and your loved ones:

1.Educate yourself about your rights — Learn exactly what you’re entitled to when you visit hospitals or doctors. You have the right to refuse any medical treatment and to ask detailed questions about all options. Know these rights well and clearly state them whenever you seek care. Your decisions will guide doctors toward your desired health goals — not theirs.

2.Document everything clearly — Keep accurate records of your medical history, conversations with doctors, and treatments you’re receiving or refusing. If you’re ever hospitalized, having these detailed records helps ensure your decisions are respected. Clearly documented notes make it harder for medical providers or hospitals to ignore your wishes. Bowden also mentions this in her interview:

“If you have to go to the hospital, be prepared. Have somebody with you … There is a patient bill of rights. You have rights in the hospital. Make sure you know those rights.”

I encourage you to print out the Caregivers and Consent document so hospital staff know what they can and cannot do to you, and they are legally required to respect your decisions. For more information on this topic, read “How to Save Your Life and Those You Love When Hospitalized.”

3.Build relationships with doctors who respect your choices — Find health care providers who openly discuss all treatment options and not just those officially approved.

If you’re someone who’s skeptical about certain medical advice, find a doctor who listens, respects your concerns, and works with you. A good relationship with an open-minded doctor helps you feel safer and makes you less vulnerable to pressure from hospitals or authorities.

4.Seek alternative care options when necessary — If you’re being denied care that you believe will help you, don’t hesitate to look elsewhere. Find independent clinics, direct primary care doctors, or specialists like Dr. Bowden who advocate for patients first.

Being proactive and choosing providers who prioritize patient-centered care helps you avoid hospitals that may prioritize political or financial incentives over your health.

5.Stay informed and speak up — Educate yourself about medical news, research, and treatment options, particularly from doctors who have demonstrated success but are often censored. Share credible information you’ve learned with your friends and family and speak out clearly whenever you encounter misinformation or censorship.

Your voice matters — speaking up helps protect everyone’s right to medical freedom and accurate health information.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Politicizing of Health Care

Q: Why is trust in hospitals declining?

A: Trust in hospitals has sharply declined due to the handling of COVID-19, including forced treatments, strict lockdown mandates, and suppression of effective alternative treatments. Hospitals prioritized federal funding and vaccine mandates over individualized patient care, which led to unnecessary deaths.

Q: Were early COVID-19 treatments effective?

A: Yes, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, early treatment with ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies, high-dose steroids, and vitamin C significantly improved patient outcomes. Patients who received these treatments early, even when severely ill, often recovered fully, highlighting the crucial role of early intervention.

Q: Why did authorities discourage treatments like ivermectin?

A: Authorities discouraged ivermectin and similar treatments because these successful, low-cost alternatives threatened the jab-focused strategy promoted by government and Big Pharma. Authorities actively suppressed these treatments to maintain demand for COVID-19 shots, spending substantial public resources to label alternative treatments as misinformation.

Q: What consequences did doctors face for speaking out about alternative treatments?

A: Doctors advocating for alternative COVID treatments faced intense backlash, censorship, threatened loss of medical licenses, and defamation. Big Tech platforms banned discussions of these treatments, and doctors like Dr. Bowden faced medical board investigations, illustrating the colluding censorship between the government and Big Pharma.

Q: How can I protect my medical freedom?

A: You can protect your medical freedom by educating yourself about patient rights, documenting medical decisions thoroughly, building relationships with doctors who respect patient choices, seeking alternative care when needed, and speaking out against misinformation and censorship.

Save This Article for Later – Get the PDF Now

Download PDF

Doctors Who Speak Out Face Harsh Consequences

[Ed.:

FDA VRBPAC December 11, 2020 Decision on Pfizer mRNA Found Invalid [VIDEO 55:12] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

EUA Approval Granted on Incomplete Death Data; Efficacy Not Robust to Missing Data; Trial Progress Delayed to Influence Trump Re-Election Bid

MAY 17, 2025

Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan is an Australian anesthesiologist and perioperative physician who was terminated from her hospital position after questioning the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines in healthy individuals. Following her dismissal, she joined a group of international medical volunteers tasked with reviewing the 500,000+ pages of internal Pfizer documents released as part of a court-ordered FOIA request. This effort was coordinated by DailyClout and Dr. Naomi Wolf. As a result of that work, Dr. Kunadhasan has become one of the foremost experts on Pfizer’s pivotal mRNA vaccine trial, focusing specifically on discrepancies in reported deaths and adverse events.

In this episode of Focal Points, Dr. Peter McCullough and epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher are joined by Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, who presents her independent forensic analysis of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial data. Her findings reveal that multiple vaccine-related deaths were concealed from regulators, autopsy results were either buried or never conducted, and Pfizer appeared to deliberately delay its efficacy announcement until after the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The December 10, 2020 FDA VRBPAC Meeting that emergency use authorized (EUA) the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (also known as BNT162b2) are shown in this image. Most have shunned the public spotlight after this fateful meeting that reviewed interim (not final) clinical trial data.

What Dr. Kunadhasan uncovers raises grave questions about data integrity, regulatory failure, fraud, and the validity of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Everyone at the meeting either knew or should have known to ask about deaths not included in the core slides and briefing booklet.

A Falsified Safety Narrative

Big Pharma Whistleblower Found Dead After Confirming Ivermectin Cures Cancer [18:53]

May 13, 2025 The People’s Voice – A veteran physician with over 30 years inside the medical system—specializing in family and emergency medicine—was found dead just days after blowing the whistle on one of the industry’s most explosive secrets: the hidden link between parasites and cancer… and the suppressed cure Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know about—Ivermectin.

This is explosive. And the consequences… are grave.

Because if what Dr. Karen Ruthman uncovered is true, then Big Pharma isn’t just failing us—it’s actively complicit in sacrificing the health of millions, knowingly suppressing a cure to keep cancer patients locked in a cycle of treatment and profit.

GOOD NEWS: Health Secretary RFK Jr. to End COVID Vaccine Recommendations for Children, Teens, and Pregnant Women

Worldwide Embalmer Survey Reveals Striking Rise in White Fibrous Clots Following COVID-19 Vaccination [59:09] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

USAF Ret. Major Thomas Haviland’s global survey finds 83% of embalmers now report white fibrous clots—found in roughly 27.5% of bodies since mass COVID-19 vaccination began.

MAY 16, 2025

Retired U.S. Air Force Major Thomas Haviland joined epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher to present findings from two large-scale investigations into post-vaccine clotting abnormalities—one focused on the deceased, the other on the living.

The latest Worldwide Embalmer White Fibrous Clot Survey—a multi-year investigation documenting the sudden and widespread appearance of anomalous white fibrous clots in the deceased—draws from the testimony of embalmers around the globe who began observing these structures after the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA injections.

The companion People’s Blood Clot Survey gathers more than 1,400 self-reported and observed clotting cases from individuals across 40 countries, offering further insight into delayed clotting complications following vaccination.

2024 Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Survey

Respondents: 301 embalmers from multiple countries
Key Results:

83% (250 embalmers) reported seeing large, white, fibrous clots in corpses during 2024—up from 73% in 2023.
These clots were found in an average of 27.5% of all embalmed bodies, a rise from 20% in the previous year.
Embalmers stated they had never observed these clots before 2021, coinciding with the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.
78% also reported seeing signs of microclotting—described as “dirty blood” or “coffee grounds”—in about 22% of cases, compared to less than 5% before 2020.
Most embalmers acknowledged that their professional associations have never addressed this issue, despite high visibility in the field.

2024 People’s Blood Clot Survey

Respondents: 1,425 individuals from over 40 countries
Purpose: To gather self-reported or observed blood clotting events since 2020
Key Results:

1,294 individuals (91%) with clotting issues had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose.
Only 79 clotting cases were reported in 2020 (pre-vaccine), compared to over 500 per year in 2021–2024.
26% of clotting cases occurred six months to over a year after injection—supporting theories of delayed-onset clot development.
Most common clot locations: legs, lungs, brain, and heart—exactly matching CDC’s V-safe “free text” field analysis.
257 individuals required surgical removal of clots; 242 individuals died from clot-related complications.

Broader Implications & Suppression

Major Haviland submitted his survey findings each year to the FDA, CDC, and NIH—without any response.
Associations in the UK and other nations refused to participate despite having codes of ethics requiring investigation of unusual post-mortem findings.
Vascular surgeons and cath lab workers, though reportedly encountering similar clots in living patients, have remained silent—many citing fear of professional repercussions.

Composition of the Clots

Microscopic and Biochemical Analysis of Anomalous White Fibrous Clots from Deceased mRNA Injection Recipients

NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

·MAY 8

Read full story

Analysis by Greg Harrison’s team and Dr. Kevin McCairn revealed that these clots:

Are composed of misfolded proteins (amyloids)—not blood.
Contain abnormal fibrinogen ratios and high phosphorus, not typical of thrombi.
Tested positive for prion seeding using RT-QuIC, raising concerns of infectious protein activity.

As Tom Haviland prepares to present to the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association in June 2025, the data continues to point to a persistent, under-investigated, and potentially catastrophic post-vaccine pathology. Despite the reluctance of institutional authorities to act, independent researchers and embalmers worldwide are stepping up to document what many believe is one of the most urgent and unaddressed medical phenomena of our time.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

Brave New Pittsburgh: Forced Use of Psychotropic Pharmaceuticals is Coming JAMES LYONS-WEILER

Allegheny County’s AOT program threatens autonomy, expands court power, and puts pharmaceutical compliance above healing. The statification of medicine must not be allowed to occur.

MAY 16, 2025

PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS LOOMING IN PITTSBURGH. If you live in Allegheny County or in Pennsylvania, this plan must be thwarted. Action item at the end. Use your voice of dissent while you still can.

“Medical science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left.” – Aldous Huxley

The New Order of Psychiatry in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County

It begins with a promise: fewer psychiatric hospitalizations, reduced ER visits, and a new path for those with serious mental illness. But beneath the surface of Allegheny County’s push to implement Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) lies a quieter transformation—one in which the courtroom becomes the clinic, and individual agency is subordinated to pharmacological obedience.

The county claims this program will provide continuity of care, reduce the strain on the emergency and judicial systems, and prevent psychiatric relapse. They cite homelessness, incarceration, and tragic outcomes post-hospital discharge as rationale. Who wouldn’t want fewer crises and better outcomes?

But listen closely, and you’ll hear the unmistakable footsteps of a new paradigm—one that criminalizes mental states, deputizes judges and social workers as proxy psychiatrists, and leaves people with few choices besides medication or court. This is not about care. It’s about compliance.

What is AOT? Why Now?

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) is a legal mechanism allowing judges to mandate psychiatric treatment—typically pharmacological—for individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness. If someone is noncompliant and deemed at risk, the court can compel participation in outpatient treatment.

Proponents offer justifications: reducing hospitalizations, improving adherence, and preventing tragedies. Allegheny County plans to implement AOT by September 1, 2025, describing it as a step-down alternative to involuntary hospitalization. But this is not an expansion of care—it is an expansion of control.

Under AOT, noncompliance is pathologized, autonomy is dismissed, and the cycle of medication, side effects, refusal, and court reentry becomes endless. Treatment ceases to be chosen; it becomes imposed. The danger is not just the medications—it’s the machinery that removes informed refusal from the equation.

Courtrooms as Clinics: A Recipe for Bureaucratic Madness

Judges are not trained in the art of psychiatry nor in the harms of polypharmacy. But under AOT, they will apply powers as if they are.

Every time a patient misses a dose or wants to change medication, the court may be involved. Judges, untrained in medicine, determine compliance. Clinicians become monitors. Families become informants. The therapeutic alliance is replaced with legal surveillance.

In abusive domestic relationships, AOT can be weaponized. An estranged spouse or parent may use the program to control or silence someone. In schools, teachers and nurses may refer students for psychiatric evaluation under vague behavior standards.

The result is bureaucratic madness: a courtroom docket full of treatment reviews, a medical system that prescribes compliance over understanding, and a judicial system incentivized to medicate rather than listen.

The Massive Human Costs of Forced Psychotropic Compliance

Antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications come with immense risks: tardive dyskinesia, akathisia, suicidal ideation, metabolic syndrome, and cognitive blunting. These are not side effects—they are suffering.

Yet under AOT, refusal becomes further proof of illness. One is not allowed to be rational about side effects. Objections are taken as symptoms. Consent becomes irrelevant. And the data? Mixed at best. The Cochrane review found no consistent benefit from AOT over voluntary care.

We are not saving people. We are forcing them into a system that profits from their compliance while ignoring the reasons they fell through the cracks in the first place.

The Pathologization of Dissent

Refusal to comply with psychiatric recommendations is now framed as a symptom called “anosognosia”—the inability to recognize one’s illness. It is psychiatry’s trump card: any resistance is interpreted as delusion. Your protest is used against you.

This redefinition of disagreement turns informed patients into dangerous ones. It disables clinicians from hearing legitimate concerns and invites a culture of forced silence. Where will that end?

The Invention of Diagnoses and Expansion of Psychiatric Authority

Psychiatric diagnoses are created by committee, not discovered like tumors or viruses. With each revision of the DSM, new disorders emerge: Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder, Internet Gaming Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder. All of them medicalize behavior once considered part of the human condition.

This diagnostic expansion opens the door for institutional abuse, allowing AOT to be applied for behaviors as common as grief, stubbornness, or rebellion.

Family Power Struggles and the Weaponization of Pharma in Conflict

AOT invites dysfunctional family dynamics into the courtroom. Estranged spouses, abusive parents, or embittered step-relatives can initiate AOT petitions. In foster care and among the elderly, caregivers may coerce compliance as a form of control.

In Allegheny County, 20,190 children were referred to child welfare in 2015. Over 1,400 elder abuse cases were reported in 2021-2022. In these vulnerable populations, forced psychiatric care becomes another tool of exploitation, not protection.

Non-Pharmaceutical Alternatives That Work

There is no need to choose between chaos and chemical obedience. Safer, more human-centered alternatives exist:

* Neurofeedback (ILF-NFB) and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)

Nutritional psychiatry and micronutrient therapy
Ketogenic and anti-inflammatory diets
CBD and non-psychoactive cannabinoid therapies
EMDR, somatic therapy, and trauma resolution
Peer-led support networks and narrative psychiatry
Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy under consent-based protocols
Community investment: housing, purpose, and belonging

These options work—but they are not profitable for pharmaceutical companies or easy to enforce by court order. So they are ignored.

Metals Detox as Baseline Care

Twenty-four years ago, my colleague Dr. Russell Blaylock warned of an epidemic of psychiatric conditions and early onset Alzheimer’s disease in the then-newborns who were scheduled to receive so much aluminum from vaccines in the then rapidly expanded CDC recommended pediatric schedule.

In fact, many psychiatric symptoms are indistinguishable from the effects of neurotoxic heavy metals: lead, mercury, aluminum. Yet no screening is required before psychiatric drugs are prescribed—even though Allegheny County has a known legacy of lead exposure.

Detoxification protocols (chelation, nutritional repletion, binders) can be transformative. But they are never considered. The AOT program will place people with reversible neuroimmunoexcitotoxicity on heavy psychotropic meds for life, because the program assumes that metal-addled brains are broken—not poisoned.

The Untold Incentives: Who Benefits from State-Forced Compliance?

Pharmaceutical companies gain lifelong, court-mandated customers. Hospitals and clinics bill for endless compliance checks. Managed care organizations meet adherence metrics. Judges expand jurisdiction into medicine. This leads to the use of the power of state to force pharmaceutical products into people: The statification of medicine.

Even school nurses and teachers may now play a role, thanks to the “any responsible person” clause. A single report from a teacher can lead to forced treatment, a ruined life, and state-sanctioned trauma—with no meaningful avenue for appeal. Or a well-meaning neighbor. Or an abusive, gas-lighting husband.

Ethical and Legal Dilemmas: From Lead Pipes to Aluminum Needles

Pittsburgh seems like a test bed for bad idea. For decades, Pittsburgh residents drank lead-contaminated water while the county board of health looked away. When a mandate was proposed to inject aluminum-laced HPV vaccines into 7th grade girls, I stood against it beside concerned parents. By standing up for due process, was threatened with arrest for asking procedural questions. I persisted. I sued. I won.

That mandate was defeated. The Board of Health’s initiative collapsed, thwarting a national move to put vaccine mandates through at the county level. Now, the same playbook is back – and they are going for our minds.

The same county that refused to detox children’s water now wants to mandate psychiatric drugs without a toxicology screen. The same officials that tried to force aluminum into every girl now want to force psychotropics into every noncompliant adult. This is not health. This is chemical coercion.

Pittsburgh’s Choice: Innovation or Obedience?

Pittsburgh is being used—again—as a testbed for national policy. AOT is the beachhead for the statification of medicine, where care is no longer delivered but enforced. Where consent is optional. Where the state prescribes, and the courts enforce.

But we can choose another path. We can demand detox before diagnosis. Therapy before medication. Consent before compliance. Community before court.

We can stop pretending that obedience is health.

How We Got Here, Why It’s Illegal, and How We Stop It

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) in Allegheny County is not emerging from a public demand for compassionate care. It is the product of a long arc of bureaucratic and legislative engineering—one that prioritizes compliance over healing, state control over medical ethics, and predictive enforcement over constitutional protections. Sold as reform, AOT is, in truth, a return to medical coercion in modern packaging.

From Legal Protections to Predictive Policing of the Mind

The foundation was laid with Pennsylvania’s Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, which emphasized due process and limited involuntary treatment to circumstances involving immediate harm. That protection was gutted by Act 106 of 2018, which amended the law to allow courts to impose outpatient treatment—including psychotropic medication—on individuals not presently dangerous but merely “likely to deteriorate” without it.

The bar was lowered. The gate was widened. And AOT was born.

Under the Act, any responsible person—a phrase left troublingly vague—can initiate a petition. A school nurse, an ex-partner, a case manager, a landlord. The system’s threshold is not conviction, diagnosis, or even current behavior—but predicted future behavior. Once triggered, individuals may be drawn into court-supervised psychiatric regimens involving drugs, monitoring, and repeat evaluations—with no end in sight.

Why It’s Illegal: Federal Law and the Constitution Say No

Pennsylvania’s AOT regime is not just ethically questionable. It violates multiple federal protections.

45 CFR §46, part of the Common Rule, guarantees the right to informed consent in all medical interventions involving human subjects.
42 CFR §482.13 outlines hospital conditions of participation, including the right to refuse treatment.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination in services and treatment based on psychiatric disability—particularly when coercive systems target that class alone.
The 14th Amendment protects bodily autonomy and requires that deprivation of liberty occur only with due process. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled (Washington v. Harper, 1990) that forced medication requires a compelling state interest—and cannot be justified by administrative convenience.

In short, the AOT framework is operating in violation of the highest standards of American law.

What the Evidence Actually Shows

Despite its legal and ethical hazards, AOT might be tolerable—if it worked. But the best available science tells us clearly: it does not.

A landmark 2016 systematic review by Dr. Jorun Rugkåsa, published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, examined more than 80 outcome studies on Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and multiple meta-analyses. The findings were unequivocal:

“There is no evidence of patient benefit from current CTO outcome studies. This casts doubt over the usefulness and ethics of CTOs.” (Rugkåsa, 2016)

The CTOs reviewed showed no reduction in hospitalizations, no improvement in adherence, and no measurable increase in quality of life. The only consistent result? Patients under AOT-like systems spent significantly more time under coercive state control.

In the United States, a 2021 NIH-funded study by Dr. Nev Jones and colleagues published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology used grounded theory interviews with 40 youth (ages 16–27) who had experienced at least one involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. The results were chilling: 70% reported lasting distrust of clinicians, even when they continued in therapy.

One participant shared, in reflection:

“The first thing I learned as soon as I was put into the hospital was that I couldn’t actually talk about what was wrong. Because then I would be taken against my will somewhere… I’m just going to say whatever I need to say to get out.”

Another noted:

“Unless you have some condition where you don’t understand what they’re looking for… of course you know. ‘Do you want to kill yourself today?’—‘No.’ ‘Are you depressed?’—‘No.’ If you show your honesty, you get sent away. So from that point on, you’re done being honest.”

These are not anomalies. These are the predictable outcomes of coercive psychiatry masquerading as support.

Allegheny County: The New Testing Ground

This is not the first time Allegheny County has been used as a proving ground for top-down public health policy. In 2016, officials attempted to mandate aluminum-adjuvanted HPV vaccines for all seventh-grade girls. Only through public outcry, procedural intervention, and the exposure of financial conflicts of interest did that effort collapse. Several Board of Health members resigned under scrutiny.

Now, AOT is advancing through the same opaque channels: silent advisory board meetings, no public hearings, no informed public. If left unchallenged, Allegheny County will become the blueprint for a national rollout of forced outpatient psychiatric control.

What You Can Do Now

Attend the advisory board meetings and request time to comment. The Mental Health/ID Advisory Board holds regular public meetings. View the schedule here.
Apply to serve on the board. Citizen involvement is permitted. If you’re a clinician, researcher, or concerned resident, your voice is needed. Apply here.
File public records requests. Use the PA Right-to-Know Law to obtain meeting minutes, draft policies, voting records, and financial disclosures related to AOT.
Challenge in court. File complaints under the ADA or pursue relief via 42 U.S.C. §1983. When state laws conflict with federally protected rights, federal law wins.
Redirect funding to real care. Demand support for trauma-informed therapy, neurofeedback, detox protocols, and integrative mental health care that respects choice and personhood. (See the Neurofeedback Advocacy Projects stunning real-world results with infralow neurofeedback. Something to fight for!)

Allegheny County is being watched—not just by its own residents, but by policymakers nationwide eager to replicate its model. If Pittsburgh stands down, the rest will follow. But if Pittsburgh stands up, it may just become the place where the tide turned—against coercion, against silence, and toward a future where care is earned by trust, not enforced by threat.

Conclusion: A Brave New Pittsburgh or a Free One?

This is not theoretical. It is happening now. The precedent is being set. Once the state can medicate your mind by force, you are no longer a citizen. You are a ward.

Allegheny County must say no. Loudly. Finally. Irrevocably.

No to chemical compliance.

No to courtroom psychiatry.

No to medicine by mandate.

Not here. Not again. Not ever.

CONTACT THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH AND ASK THEM TO CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE TURNING PITTSBURGH INTO ALDOUS HUXLEY’S BRAVE NEW WORLD.

Top Experts Sound Alarm Over ‘Molecular Chaos’ in Covid-Vaxxed Frank Bergman

May 15, 2025

A group of world-renowned American doctors and scientists has issued a warning after alarming new data emerged revealing “molecular chaos” in people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The warning was issued during a new interview featuring bioscientist Dr. John Catanzaro, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, and epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.

During this groundbreaking discussion, the leading experts present new molecular data on patients impacted by Covid mRNA “vaccination.”

The data was uncovered during a joint investigation by Catanzaro’s Neo7Bioscience and the University of North Texas Genomics & Biodiscovery Institute.

The alarming findings of the study have exposed a concerning pattern of biological disruption.

The investigation utilized the RNA Expression Variant Instability Signature Surveillance (REViSS) platform.

The researchers analyzed peripheral blood samples from real-world patients to assess hallmark cancer-causing gene expression, detect synthetic RNA fragments, and identify dysregulated signaling pathways associated with immune dysfunction and cancer progression.

The results support mounting evidence of reverse transcription, immune destabilization, and tumor-promoting gene dysregulation in mRNA-injected individuals.

The findings have ignited debate across the biomedical and public health communities.

According to the interview, peripheral blood samples analyzed by REViSS reveal “molecular chaos” in vaccinated individuals.

The examples of “chaos” recorded include misfolded protein accumulation, oncogenic signaling, and persistent traces of vaccine-derived RNA components such as cancer-causing SV40 promoter sequences and poly(A) tails.

The team asserts that these elements are evidence of reverse transcription.

Reverse transcription is when the synthetic mRNA from the vaccine is copied into host DNA, potentially disrupting gene regulation indefinitely.

Catanzaro and McCullough cite the oft-referenced Aldén et al. (2022) study.

The study demonstrated that BNT162b2 mRNA can be reverse-transcribed in vitro in a liver cell line (Huh7).

The detection of spike-associated sequences, including synthetic elements, in blood samples months after vaccination is also a major concern.

During the interview, the experts warn that the findings are evidence that the Covid mRNA “vaccines” are behind surging cases of aggressive cancers and devastating immune system collapse.

The interview escalates its alarm by revealing that vaccinated individuals show gene expression profiles consistent with oncogenic signaling and immune collapse.

The REViSS team found that Covid “vaccines” block tumor suppressors (e.g., TP53, BRCA1/2) and activate cancer promoters, especially in glioblastoma cases emerging within months of mRNA vaccination.

McCullough, Catanzaro, and Hulscher described this process as “oncogenic flipping.”

Dr. Catanzaro also highlighted abnormal signaling in structural proteins—collagens, laminins, and misfolded matrix proteins.

He noted that these proteins could be contributors to the formation of the white, fibrous clots observed in deceased mRNA recipients recently reported by Slay News.

WATCH [1:39] https://rumble.com/v6tf6bj-top-experts-sound-alarm-over-molecular-chaos-in-covid-vaxxed.html

The data presented establish a growing body of evidence that mRNA vaccination can disrupt critical gene expression networks through persistent spike protein expression and possible genomic integration.

These disruptions are detectable long after injection.

They are also correlated with cancer progression and immune dysfunction.

Meanwhile, Hulscher is among a growing number of leading experts warning about the large “white fibrous clots” that embalmers are finding in the deceased bodies of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Hulscher recently interviewed embalmer Richard Hirschman and industrial chemist Greg Harrison about the alarming discoveries.

Hirschman and Harrison have been investigating the surging reports from embalmers around the world about the “rubbery clots.”

Before 2021, these strange clots were extremely rare, Hirschman explains.

However, since the mRNA injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021, they are now frequently being found in both veins and arteries.

Shockingly, Hirschman reports that the clots are now being found in a staggering 30-50% of all bodies he embalms.

Source: slaynews.com

BANNED: The Forgotten Miracle Cure for Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat and Dental Disease

Here’s what Big Pharma never wanted you to know about DMSO.

MAY 14, 2025

The following information is based on a report originally published by A Midwestern Doctor. Key details have been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.

The FDA has known since 1964 that DMSO could treat “incurable” conditions like blindness and tinnitus.

Instead of embracing it—they banned it. And buried the evidence for decades.

Now, people across the country are rediscovering DMSO—and the results are absolutely jaw-dropping.

This is the powerful, natural healing breakthrough Big Pharma tried to erase from history.

Upgrade to paid

The information in this article comes from the work of medical researcher

A Midwestern Doctor. For all the eye-opening details and sources, read the full 21,000-word report below.

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

How DMSO Cures Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat and Dental Disease

•DMSO can often significantly improve one’s vision, treat conditions such as macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, and at times allow blind individuals to regain their sight. It is also often very helpful for sore and strained eyes and relieves excessive irritation and inflammation, along with many other eye conditions (e.g., cataracts…

6 months ago · 1701 likes · 630 comments · A Midwestern Doctor

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) isn’t just a pain reliever.

It’s one of the most promising breakthroughs in medical history.

Why? Because it boosts circulation, reduces inflammation, reactivates dying cells, kills bacteria, and so much more.

It’s been used for arthritis, strokes—even injuries that nothing else could heal.

And the very best part? It’s extremely safe!

HOW TO DETOXIFY FROM VACCINATIONS & HEAVY METALS by Michael Edwards
October 7, 2014 Last updated on: December 15, 2015

If you choose to vaccinate (or believe you have no choice), it’s time to detoxify. This is not an article intended to debate the efficacy of vaccinations, but merely to address the toxicity from vaccinations and advise on elimination of the toxins.

Regardless of what your position on vaccinations is, any rational person cannot deny that the ingredients in vaccines are toxic. In fact, almost every single ingredient in any immunization is toxic to the human body. Besides the vitamins and minerals, nobody in their right mind would drink a concoction with any one or combination of most of the vaccine ingredients (and those vitamins and minerals they add are toxic, too). Most vaccinations are directly injected into our bodies, allowing the ingredients to directly enter the bloodstream, which rationally, seems like an even more dangerous approach.

Vaccine ingredients (adjuvants and preservatives) and substances used in the manufacturing process, including vaccine-production media that are present only in trace quantities, include: sucrose, fructose, dextrose, potassium phosphate, FD&C Yellow #6, aluminum lake dye, fetal bovine serum, sodium bicarbonate, monosodium glutamate, aluminum hydroxide, benzethonium chloride, lactose, aluminum potassium sulfate, peptone, bovine extract, formaldehyde, thimerosal, ammonium sulfate, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bovine extract), calf serum, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxphosphate sulfate, and ethanol. Vaccinations also contain many inorganic minerals, vitamins, amino acids, salts, and sugars.

If anyone can tell me why in the heck they put artificial colors into vaccines, I would love to read about it in comments. Does anyone really care what color an immunization is?

Obviously this sort of cocktail going into the bloodstream can slow things down. You are introducing heavy metals, preservatives, and a host of other inorganic compounds, most of which are not even found in nature, directly into the blood stream. Much of the vaccine material will not leave the body without assistance, especially with a typical modern lifestyle and diet.

Eat Well

The goal in order to detoxify from vaccinations is to flush the body of toxins, including heavy metals. There are a few good supplements available for chelation, but it can also be done with the right foods. Along with a healthy diet, the best ingredients for a natural heavy metal chelation regimen are chlorella, cilantro, citrus peels, spirulina, and garlic.

Most vegetables have some chelation properties, and eating combinations of vegetables increases their ability to chelate exponentially (this is true for all the health benefits). Make salads with more than ten different vegetables with lots of cilantro, avocado, and garlic every day. Avoid sugar, and avoid any and all refined, processed, manufactured foods.

Fix the Immune System

Sugars are present in vaccines, and sugars suppress the immune system. Sugars also feed parasites, viruses (indirectly), fungus, bacteria, and any other little creature that wants to harm us. These refined sugars travel through the bloodstream to wherever infection can be fed. As mentioned, lots of garlic is recommended, as well as the following supplements: oil of oregano, Echinacea, goldenseal, and goldenthread. These supplements, especially when used in conjunction with each other, will help purify the blood, remove toxins, and keep any infectious agent at bay, all while helping to repair the immune system.

In addition to those supplements, a B vitamin complex is recommended for a few weeks after immunizing. Formaldehydes, and metals like mercury and aluminum make assimilating B vitamins more difficult. Until the heavy metals are removed, the solution is to take a high quality B complex supplement and to make sure the digestive system is as healthy as possible.

Drink Lots of Fluids

I try to drink a gallon of cranberry lemonade with stevia and cayenne (click for recipe) every day. I am also 6’2” and I weigh 220 pounds. Use your best judgment. For most people, a gallon of water a has huge benefits including flushing out our system or toxins, heavy metals, and impurities, detoxifying our blood, lowering blood pressure, and reducing aging dramatically, as long as you are getting enough minerals and other nutrition while you do it. But to make drinking that much water even more difficult, for best nutrient absorption and heavy metal chelation, it’s best to take food with supplements and drink water (or lemonade) when the body is not trying to digest. You can also alternate days where you drink a lot more and eat a lot less, and vice-versa. This is a great way to detoxify quickly and get plenty of nutrition at the same time.

Exercise

Sweating, breathing hard, and moving help detoxify the body. Exercise also moves toxins that had otherwise settled, making elimination more likely. While you exercise, be sure to breathe properly. Breathe deeply from your diaphragm and expand your abdomen when you fill your air with lungs. It’s often said that 70 to 80% of the toxins we expel from our body evacuate through the lungs. The skin is the next most significant organ in regards to toxin elimination, hence the sweat with exercising. Running, exercising in a sauna (a non toxic sauna, ideally), jumping rope, rebounding, hiking with hills, squats, yoga, and tai chi are all great exercises for aiding detoxification.

Hot and Cold Hydrotherapy

Hot water increases blood flow to the surface of the body. Cold water drives the blood from the surface to the core of the body. Alternating hot and cold water increases blood flow and speeds up circulation. It brings fresh blood with oxygen and nutrients to the organs and glands and carries away toxins and waste. Dr. Shillington suggests starting with water as hot as you can stand for a minimum of two minutes. Then turn off the hot water for two minutes of cold—the colder the better. Alternate back and forth for a total of 20 minutes, ending with cold. Read more at Hot & Cold Hydrotherapy.

Supplements

Shillington’s Blood Detox is absolutely amazing, and in my mind, essential for any detox. With goldenseal, it cleans the blood, which helps every part of the body in every way.

Shillington’s Total Nutrition Formula has chlorella, spirulina, and citrus peels in it, which is awesome for detoxifying and chelating heavy metals, and it’s the best multivitamin/mineral supplement I know.

Shillington’s Intestinal Detox & Shillington’s Intestinal Cleanse will repair the intestines, remove heavy metals from the digestive tract, and promote healthy gut flora.

Boost the chelation with this powerful supplement HM Complex by Pure Encapsulations.

Oil of oregano, Echinacea, goldenseal (which is in Blood Detox), and Chinese goldthread are also highly recommended, and don’t forget the garlic and the cilantro.

B vitamin complex is recommended for a few weeks at least, since heavy metal toxicity causes the body to assimilate b vitamins inefficiently.

Keep Doing It

Unfortunately, the amount of heavy metals and other very toxic compounds in vaccines causes a huge burden on our immune system and takes a long time to expel from the body. Where the toxins settle inside the body, determines what, if any, vaccine injuries occur.

Keep in mind that heavy metals can shift. And they are heavy, as their name denotes. They often settle at the feet. A footbath detox works well for pulling toxins from the feet. More importantly, keep eating well, keep drinking lots of fluids, keep chelating, and keep exercising and detoxifying. The reality is, the healthier an individual is, the less likely they are to be injured by vaccines.

Regardless of their efficacy, the irony is, the healthier a person is, the less benefit they could possibly derive from vaccines. Also check out How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children.

Recommended Supplements:

Further Reading:

Sources:

Renowned Toxicologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Have Destroyed Immune Systems of Millions Frank Bergman

May 14, 2025

A world-renowned toxicologist has warned that millions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” have been impacted by a devastating injury, including himself.

The chilling warning was issued by the associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Western Australia, Dr. Phil Burcham.

In a blistering critique published in the May 2025 edition of the journal Quadrant, Burcham raises urgent questions about the chemical design and safety testing of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The Covid mRNA injections also exposed patients to unvalidated toxic excipients and sidestepped rigorous preclinical evaluation, he argues.

Burcham’s article, titled “An Injured Toxicologist Reflects on COVID mRNA Vaccines (Part II),” interrogates the molecular architecture of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platforms.

He contends that serious and rapid-onset toxicities experienced by thousands of Australians stem not solely from immune responses to spike protein but from the synthetic materials used to construct LNP delivery systems.

The top professor notes that his own debilitating trigeminal nerve injury was caused by a Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

These synthetic materials used to construct LNP delivery systems include:

Ionizable lipids (e.g., SM-102, ALC-0315)
PEGylated lipids
Unnatural modified nucleotides (e.g., pseudouridine)

Burcham’s central thesis is that mRNA vaccines were built upon unstable, “pharmacologically obese” molecules with seven well-known liabilities.

He explains that chemists tried to patch these liabilities using risky excipients rather than structural redesign.

While not an empirical study in itself, the essay draws heavily on:

Burcham’s personal toxicological training and vaccine injury
Published toxicology and pharmacology literature (e.g., Liu, Vaccines, 2019)
A 2021 exposé by Ryan Cross in Chemical & Engineering News
Unpublished biodistribution concerns from Pfizer’s own regulatory filings

This makes the piece a hybrid: expert commentary, post-market pharmacovigilance hypothesis, and forensic review of neglected preclinical science.

In his searing analysis, Burcham exposes deep flaws in the pharmacological vetting of LNP components used in Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Neither Pfizer’s nor Moderna’s mRNA lipids were supported by robust toxicological data before their mass public rollout.

Despite their pivotal role in delivering mRNA payloads, these ionizable lipids lacked transparent preclinical safety disclosures.

According to science journalist Ryan Cross’s 2021 reporting, insiders acknowledged that most LNP candidates failed in animal models after promising in vitro performance.

However, this data has never reached the public domain.

Both vaccine makers declined interviews on their lipid selection processes, adding opacity to already-opaque safety assumptions.

Burcham’s case for acute chemical toxicity is rooted in disturbing patterns of rapid-onset neurological symptoms.

These symptoms include his own experience of immediate trigeminal nerve pain post-injection.

He argues that the onset of he symptoms is far too fast to be immune-mediated.

The implication: LNPs may provoke pharmacological injury distinct from the widely discussed spike-protein-driven mechanisms.

Supporting this, Burcham references a general practitioner who reportedly summoned more ambulances for mRNA vaccine reactions in a single year than in a decade of standard vaccinations.

He suggests that such cases are not isolated flukes but indicative of a broader signal.

Beyond acute reactions, Burcham contends that the very architecture of mRNA-LNP vaccines defied long-established medicinal chemistry norms.

He critiques the decision to compensate for mRNA’s size, charge, and immunogenicity with exotic formulations.

These formulations rely on PEGylated lipids and synthetic nucleotides that introduce independent toxicity risks.

PEG allergies are known to cause hypersensitivity, and modified bases like pseudouridine, while improving mRNA stability, have toxicological parallels with older antiviral drugs linked to liver steatosis, pancreatitis, and muscle damage.

LNP developers failed to provide radiolabeled (hot) biodistribution studies or worst-case toxicology in large animals, bypassing safeguards that once would have precluded such products from mass use in healthy populations.

Burcham concludes that systemic biodistribution of LNPs—now well documented—violates foundational safety criteria and would have disqualified these products under pre-pandemic regulatory norms.

Burcham’s critique exposes a troubling pattern of regulatory shortcuts and opaque corporate practices:

No published safety studies on ionizable lipid clearance, organ accumulation, or metabolic byproducts.
No transparent peer-reviewed justification for choosing SM-102 or ALC-0315 over safer alternatives.
No systematic screening of LNP components for long-term safety in populations with known allergic, neurological, or mitochondrial susceptibility.

Even more concerning is Burcham’s assertion that companies and regulators failed to anticipate a worst-case “internal dose ≈ 100%” scenario.

This scenario is where all injected material enters the bloodstream, potentially targeting sensitive tissues like the heart and brain.

Phil Burcham’s Quadrant essay is a rare example of toxicological introspection from within the biomedical establishment.

It raises hard questions about the safety-by-design of mRNA vaccines, the opacity of lipid nanoparticle development, and the failure to heed long-established medicinal chemistry wisdom.

If Burcham’s account is correct, then millions of people, especially those reporting rapid-onset or persistent neurological symptoms, may have been injured not solely by the spike protein but by the very materials used to deliver it.

The implications for regulatory reform, vaccine injury compensation, and pharmaceutical transparency are profound.

However, these concerns remain underexplored by global regulatory agencies.

Until they are directly addressed in open-access, peer-reviewed research, the public will be left wondering whether safety was sacrificed in the rush to deploy novel mRNA technologies.

“Parasite Treatments and Cancer” w/ Dr. Peter McCullough Naomi Wolf

MAY 13, 2025

“Dr. Peter McCullough, health freedom hero and distinguished cardiologist, addresses some key medical stories in the news. Dr. Casey Means, nominee for Surgeon General, actually never sat for her board certification, so is not fully qualified as a ‘surgeon.’ President Trump signed an executive order to ban gain-of-function research and is now dropping the price of certain drugs. And: a new anti-parasite protocol developed by Dr. McCullough and The Wellness Company shows promise not only for killing parasites but for treating cancer.”

Watch Now:

Is Medicare a Slow-Kill Program? DR. COLLEEN HUBER

Is this seemingly benevolent reward offered to seniors for a lifetime of work, rather, a guiding hand to the grave?

SEP 04, 2022

The new “Inflation Reduction Act” (IRA) has a name that is highly questionable, given its profligate and inflation-stimulating government spending, such as one quarter trillion dollars for climate change tax credits for corporations, and for 87,000 additional IRS agents. The falsification of the name of this Act alone rings alarm bells for violation of 18 USC Section 1001, which makes it a felony for any government actor to falsify a material fact in a document related to a federal matter. This crime carries up to five years in prison.

However, the fine print of the IRA may be even nastier for seniors, black people, and so ultimately for all of the rest of us.

This new Act pairs Medicare decisions to a group called the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), to carry out cost-effectiveness research (CER). This review panel is the rehabilitated “death panel” that was so controversial during Obamacare rollout. Based on this guidance, Medicare will set drug prices based on costs to its program of funding an additional year of patients’ continued lives with a specific drug versus already existing therapies.

Especially on the chopping block are drugs that treat sickle cell anemia and multiple myeloma, which are diseases that disproportionately affect black people, as well as drugs that treat ALS and chronic kidney disease, which disproportionately affect seniors.

If you think our benevolent government would never place a person’s life on the chopping block for being too expensive to continue, consider what ICER President Steve Pearson wrote about orphan drug spending, that it places “an undue burden . . . on others for the sake of a few.” And earlier he wrote “Looking forward, . . . broad application of the rule of rescue will be increasingly untenable.” Choosing drugs that would end up having the effect of shortening lives, rather than those that would end up lengthening lives, turns the bean counters into “de facto death panels,” according to writer Robert Goldberg.

But does Medicare find it so cost-effective for seniors to die earlier that its drug prices would take that cost-benefit analysis into consideration? That is, is it unreasonable to make the leap from there to the suspicion that Medicare might actually be a slow-kill program?

Who has really been ‘killing Grandma’ in the COVID era?

Freely breathing creatures of the human variety were criticized and shamed for our unobstructed respiratory practices, through the COVID era, for ‘killing Grandma’ by lack of mask-wearing. But was it us, the relentlessly unmasked, who were killing Grandma?

Scrutiny of Medicare’s mission might have been seen as preposterous before COVID, a respiratory viral disease for which the world went crazy, but actually had no greater mortality than the flu virus. Infection fatality for COVID is 0.15%, and for a typical annual flu is usually about 0.17% (Statista data from 2006 to 2008, back when the counting was more straightforward.) COVID symptoms varied from typical flu, especially loss of smell and reduced oxygenation, but otherwise the death rate remained about the same as most years.

Yet for this typical seasonal viral mortality, hospital protocols, among much else in our world, have transformed to something utterly unrecognizable from the recent past. Ventilators were ordered, distributed and quickly connected to many tracheas, to a worldwide chorus of muffled protests, both from the victims of an over-pressurized tube rammed down the throat, and from their family members who were made to wait outside. More about this bizarre new protocol below.

Why are Americans forced onto Medicare at age 65?

Before COVID, I never thought too much about Medicare, having been younger then, as we all were. But recently I noticed the fine print at Medicare.gov says that if a person turning 65 chooses NOT to accept Medicare Part B, which covers primary visits and their referred specialists – and which are exclusively within conventional medicine, never, never naturopathic medicine – So if you refuse to sign up for Medicare Part B, your social security payment is REDUCED, and it is reduced for life, and there is no way to get out of this reduction. Furthermore, this reduction is called a “penalty.” I thought: Wow! Here I have to pay my entire working life for a type of medicine that I never use, (conventional medicine) and have zero desire to use. And then, even the meager social security living allowance is actually reduced if I, a naturopathic physician, don’t succumb and submit to a type of medicine that I have avoided my whole life like plague? (I have had best knowledge and help from my naturopath and my chiropractor; they are my only primary care doctors, and the only ones I have needed at all for the decades that I have known them, including through a bout with COVID and a disabling acute injury, both now long gone.)

So this blatant First Amendment violation is baked right into Medicare policy. But let’s explore further how it plays out in the case of retirees.

It turns out that an employee arriving to age 65 is at the mercy of an employer, particularly if in a small company. On this page, Medicare.gov implies that an employer, particularly of under 20 employees, has the right to commit age discrimination, in blatant violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. This could have the effect of forcing the 65-year old employee off of the company insurance that other employees still have, by virtue of their youth, and onto Medicare, at the discretion of the employer. It seems that Medicare is begging for litigation against this mandate and this penalty.

I would argue that this forced herding into conventional medicine is a violation also of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . .” What could Medicare possibly have to do with religion? Well, you see, if one believes that the synthetic, mono-molecular, patented chemicals that are produced in factories by a pharmaceutical industry could possibly have beneficial or restorative or synergistic – or even well-tolerated – impact on a body that is the heritage of millions of years of intimate contact with the biodiversity of nature – If one would like to believe that, one is certainly welcome to do so. It just doesn’t happen to be a creed to which I subscribe.

Therefore, I feel a bit like the Virginia colonial Baptists who complained to Jefferson and Madison about being forced to pay taxes to the Anglican Church, not being Anglicans themselves. Jefferson and Madison agreed with the right of the Baptist protestors to be free of Anglican control, and as a result we have the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which protects you and me from being subject to the rituals, sacraments, forced worship, genuflection, church attendance and tithes of someone else’s religion.

Therefore, I think the Medicare Part B penalty is unconstitutional and unjust.

And why would people be penalized for rejecting a “free” entitlement? What is the government’s motive for inflicting this penalty? Is it that living a long healthy life without chronic disease, on a natural medicine regimen is too expensive for the social security fund? Is it no longer commendable to make it to one’s 90’s or over 100 years of age? Perhaps only a conspiracy theorist could even imagine an entitlement being subject to an actuarial priority, or could imagine a goal to eliminate the long-lived, unvaccinated, natural living cohort, for unwanted illustration and example of the benefits of that lifestyle to others.

Next, let’s look at what happened in hospitals during peak COVID

Now let’s go back to how COVID changed hospitalization and particularly “healthcare” and its creeping inclusion of euthanasia, in the case of seniors.

Since COVID came along, the public has had brief, not-well-publicized glimpses into the much-altered lives and health of hospital patient escapees, and we have heard some horrendous stories of how they were treated while there. As a physician, I have heard through the stethoscope radically altered heart rhythms of such escapees who managed to survive a Remdesivir assault. Remdesivir is a drug that is known to be highly toxic to the liver and the kidneys and the lungs. Multiple organ failure was repeatedly observed after use of this drug. Yet it is Anthony Fauci’s drug of choice for treating COVID. Remdesivir has been observed to lead to respiratory failure in 11% of the patients who are on it for 10 days (“commonly reported,”) even to the point of then requiring intubation.

So Remdesivir is clearly contraindicated in COVID patients, yet in the upside-down world of hospital medicine, it is “standard of care.”

Hospital COVID procedures in the US have been revealed in horrifying anecdotes, empirical observations by very rare whisteblower nurses and doctors. For example, in 2020, ER physician Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell blew the whistle on ventilators that had an 80% mortality rate within a couple days of use with COVID patients. He asked why it was expected for him to be blowing patients’ functional lung tissue out with way over-pressurized ventilators, noting the high mortality. Nurses would mention hospital patients who in 2020-2021 were deprived of both food and water, with a story of a hospitalized man who had to crawl on hands and knees to not be seen by the staff, to the toilet bowl, in order to get a drink of water, and others’ similar desperate grasps for survival. This was especially the case with seniors who were positive for COVID, and even more discriminatory for patients with multiple co-morbidities.

With COVID, came the 2020 US CARES Act, a little-mentioned $160 billion, then $178 billion, boondoggle (more than double the cost of the Ukraine boondoggle so far, AND before intense recent inflation). This Act funded some very peculiar hospital protocols – with tens of millions, and hundreds of millions, of dollars going to the biggest hospitals for COVID treatment.

Yet, in the US, we still have little system-wide testimony or evidence of brutality to hospitalized COVID patients revealed in the mass media to the public. Unfortunately, many of the closest witnesses are now dead.

So let’s then look at the UK, and then what we know of parallels between the UK and the US.

The UK has revealed more of the financial and political involvement in euthanasia decisions in high-risk hospital situations, in publicly available documents.

Journalist Maajid Nawaz spoke with UK medical researcher Stuart Wilkie. https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/Radical-Episode-17:d

Wilkie told Nawaz, “Hundreds of thousands of people are being routinely murdered in the National Health Service.” Where does he get that information? Well, he found in the House of Lords Library and the House of Commons Library some revealing documents.

Chris Whitty, England’s Chief Medical Officer, in a document that he insisted not be released to the public, wrote of “consideration of mass burials and the potential use of population triage by the NHS . . . [which raised questions of] potential responses of the general population upon hearing that such measures were being considered or used.” This document is in the House of Lords Library.

Euthanasia has been openly discussed and openly practiced. Here we see a House of Commons definition: “A good death requires three things: syringe drivers, the medications, and the staff to administer it.” Euthanasia is from the Greek for “good death.” This mass killing was financially incentivized, and lack of cooperation was disincentivized in UK hospitals.

UK patients are also disincentivized from choosing to live. When a hospital patient is pressured to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order, they are told ‘if we try to resuscitate you, we will break your ribs.’ You don’t want painful broken ribs, do you? At every step, from hospital triage and admittance to treatment, seniors suffered by far the worst of any age group.

It is not in dispute that the UK government ordered an inordinately large amount of Midazolam in the COVID era. By the time peak COVID mania had crested, 27 months of drugs were used within 9 months in the UK. Somehow Midazolam was added to treatment for COVID disease protocol. As Nawaz asks, “Why add a drug that makes it harder for you to breathe?” when COVID already impairs oxygenation?

Midazolam should have been the LAST thing a COVID patient would be given.

Oh, it was the last thing they were given alright. Together with another respiratory depressant, acting in lethal synergy. That drug is morphine.

The amount of Midazolam needed to kill a person within 24 hours is about 9.5 mg, and this was used in UK hospitals, where 83% of those died within 24 hours on that dose, together with 14 mg morphine, which has a highly dangerous synergistic effect, when dosed together with Midazolam, of respiratory depression. It has been known for decades that these drugs used together risk respiratory arrest, which is lethal.

In the United States, where states permit execution by lethal injection, Midazolam is one of the major drugs used for that purpose.

NEW STUDY — Spike Protein Detected in 92% of Vaccine-Injured Patients Up to 245 Days After Injection NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

92% of symptomatic individuals with post-vaccine syndrome had spike protein in their immune cells up to 8 months after injection—raising serious concerns about post-vaccination chronic disease burden.

MAY 13, 2025

The study titled, Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16+ monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals, was just published in the journal Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics:

ABSTRACT

Despite over 13 billion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses administered globally, persistent post-vaccination symptoms, termed post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), resemble post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Symptoms like cardiac, vascular, and neurological issues often emerge shortly after vaccination and persist for months to years, mirroring PASC. We previously showed the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein persists in CD16+ monocytes after infection, potentially driving PASC. Approved vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca) deliver synthetic S1 to elicit immunity, suggesting a shared mechanism. We hypothesized that vaccine-derived S1 persistence in CD16+ monocytes sustains inflammation akin to PASC, contributing to PCVS. We studied 50 individuals with PCVS symptoms lasting over 30 days post-vaccination and 26 asymptomatic controls, using (1) machine learning-based immune profiling to compare cytokine signatures with PASC, (2) flow cytometry to detect S1 in CD16+ monocytes, and (3) LC-MS to confirm S1 across vaccine types. We correlated S1 persistence with symptom duration and inflammation. Prior infection was excluded via clinical history, anti-nucleocapsid antibody tests, and T-detect assays, though definitive tests are lacking. Preliminary findings suggest S1 persistence in CD16+ monocytes and an associated inflammatory profile may contribute to PCVS. Further studies are needed to confirm causality and prevalence.

Here are the key findings:

Spike Protein Found in Immune Cells Months After Vaccination

The S1 portion of the spike protein—produced by the COVID-19 vaccines—was detected in circulating immune cells (CD16+ monocytes) up to 245 days after vaccination, in individuals who had never tested positive for COVID-19 and had no evidence of prior infection based on antibody and T-cell testing.

These individuals reported persistent symptoms resembling Long COVID (PASC), but they had only received the vaccine—not the virus.

Call for action – please submit public comment to the FDA asking them to remove mRNA shots from market SASHA LATYPOVA

MAY 13, 2025

ACIP is meeting on May 22 to decide on the “updated formula” for 2025-2026 Covid-19 injections for the United States. Page to submit public comments available here:

Link to submit public comment

Let’s flood them with comments and see if this administration is going to deliver on their promises, and promises to whom – the people or the pharma?

Use These 5 Food Hacks To Heal The Body & STARVE CANCER I Dr. William Li [28:24]

April 5, 2025 – Use These 5 Food Hacks To Heal The Body & STARVE CANCER I Dr. William Li

Catherine Austin Fitts: We Know That mRNA Technology is a Killer, and Yet We See the President Supporting It [VIDEO 2:06:15] LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY

“…since the Trump inauguration, 2.6 million children have been given mRNA shots…So this, to me, is nothing short of murder.”

Source: Sense Receptor

“We know that mRNA technology is a killer, and yet we see the president supporting it…the constituencies that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening…are very, very strong…but this is nothing short of murder.”

Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report, describes for Jimmy Dore) how the mRNA injections that have been launched on the world constitute “murder.”

Despite their apparent danger, however, the former HUD official notes that there are entrenched “constituencies…that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening.”

“If you look at what’s happened with the effort to change the policies so that we don’t poison our children, what the confirmation of Kennedy at HHS said, the failure to get Weldon put into CDC, and the switch now on the Surgeon General, what it says to me is the constituencies that want this diminution of life expectancy and want this poisoning to keep happening, those constituencies are very, very strong,” Fitts says.

Fitts adds, “We know that MRNA technology is a killer, and yet we see the president supporting MRNA technology… I just saw a tweet, and I haven’t had time to confirm it since the beginning of the year, but since the Trump inauguration, 2.6 million children have been given mRNA shots. There’s been no change in the heavy ‘vaccine’ schedules. We don’t need studies to show where autism is coming from. We know where it’s coming from. So this, to me, is nothing short of murder.”

After Dore shows Fitts a clip of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary saying he’s not sure sure if a healthy 12-year-old girl should receive a seventh COVID booster, Fitts notes that “He’s lying because in the box.” The former HUD official adds, “He’s not allowed to say the truth.”

Full Video

MASS ARRESTS NOW: The Horrific Fauci “Experiments” [VIDEOS] 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

MAY 11, 2025

Dr. Fauci aka Dr. Mengele 2.0, former White House Chief Medical Adviser and prominent PSYOP-19 scamdemic orchestrator, was carefully selected by his Intelligence-Industrial Complex handlers just prior to their tragic AIDS con.

Early in his career, Fauci was installed at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a clinical associate in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’s (NIAID) Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (LCI) precisely because of his especially malignant sociopathic tendencies.

And Fauci certainly did not disappoint, proving during the manufactured AIDS crisis that he was the perfect man to seed the fraudulent “Trust the Science” scam by running his warmup beta test trial mass murder operation costing hundreds of thousands of lives way back in the 1980s (AZT rhymes with Remdesivir), all while arranging all kinds of terrifying “experiments” from pointless animal torture to deadly and illegal gain of function (GOF) bioterror “research” to utterly depraved trials that were worse than the most twisted horror movies; to wit:

FAUCI was SEWING DEAD BABY SCALPS ON the BACKS of MICE, and taxpayers were funding it. The tissue had to be alive for this experiment to begin with, so the bigger question is, where was FAUCI getting the dead babies from and were these babies aborted on purpose for for these horrific experiments that taxpayers had no idea they were funding?

Not only was Fauci specifically in charge of these experiments, but he had to sign off, approve the funding, and come up with the experiment in the first place. From experimenting and torturing beagle dogs, letting sand flies eat them alive, to using purposely aborted babies, to purposely creating dangerous bioweapons and hiding in under the false pretense of “vaccine science,” Fauci needs and should have been in prison decades ago. Arrest Fauci now for crimes against humanity.

Source

All of this sickening “work” as paid from theft via “income” taxes, just like the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon C19 “vaccines” were foisted on humanity for “free” off the backs of the very tax slaves they were attempting to peacefully cull.

Talk about being forced to pay for your own demise, and paying for pointless and sickening “research” that goes directly against everything humanity stands for.

And for all of his Crimes Against Humanity, Dr. Fauci was richly rewarded, with his household assets growing by the millions after his convenient retirement, and his net worth topping more than $15 million. During his bioterror reign at the Federal agency level, Fauci also happened to be the highest-paid government bureaucrat, making $480,000 per year when he stepped down, or more than the President of the United States. This does not even account for his Intelligence-Industrial Complex black ops money laundered offshore accounts.

Crime pays, and mind-bending horror-show levels of crime apparently pays even better.

Thankfully, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is currently conducting an investigation into Fauci and the origins of PSYOP-19; if this is an honest inquiry, then it will be an open and shut case:

HOLY SH*T!! We know why Fauci requested a preemptive pardon!

The biolabs in Ukraine are REAL!

Tulsi Gabbard: “We are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on this, as well as Secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan Lab, as well as many others.”

“Many of these other biolabs around the world were actually US-funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.”

“It’s because this gain-of-function research is happening in biolabs around the world. That by the way is still on the US Embassy Ukraine’s website today about how the US has funded these biolabs.”

“US -unded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another Covid like pandemic. And for that I was called a Russian asset. You’re, you know, trumpeting Putin’s talking points.”

“All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts. That by the way are still on US Embassy Ukraine’s website today about how the US has funded these biolabs in Ukraine”

Source

Mass arrests would not just include Fauci, but also the likes of “philanthropist” Bill Gates, as well as a long-winding procession of other government, BigPharma and corporate apparatchik coconspirators, with particular emphasis on CIA Manchurian Candidate extraordinaire Barack Hussein Obama, who was instrumental in offshoring GOF “research” to the CCP’s Wuhan Institute of Virology ahead of their planned C19 release:

“It’s effective. This vaccine is tailored for kids.”

The mass arrests can’t come soon enough.

Do NOT comply.

[Ed.:

Dr. Yeadon: ‘This Study in Rats is Devastating…It Strikes Me as Satanic.’ By Dr. Michael Yeadon

Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on “The mRNA-based pseudo-“vaccines” destroy over 60% of non-renewable egg supply of female rats.” by Suavek

May 10, 2025

Thank you, Suavek, for making me aware of this.

As you know, I’ve been very concerned about designed-in toxicity of the fake vaccines for very many years.

This study in rats is devastating. It is conventional in the field of toxicology to assume that what happens in lab animals does predict toxicity in humans UNLESS there is evidence that mitigates it, which there isn’t here.

Please share this along with my note.

I’m continually angry about this aspect particularly. It strikes me as satanic.

P.S: I’m sorry to assail you so often with upsetting information. My heart is heavy.

Dr Mike Yeadon:

I’ve not returned to reproductive toxicity risk since first pointing it out with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg in our open letter to European Medicines Agency on December 1st, 2020. That letter was extremely thoroughly censored and picked up by almost nobody, even so called alternative media.

It was known with certainty even before the faked regulatory authorisations that prompting the body to manufacture non-self proteins WILL trigger autoimmune diseases. Not a maybe. It’s a will do so. The doctors were taught this in medical school. It’s Immunology 101. It’s the basis of avoiding failures of organ transplants.

It was also known in 2012 if not earlier that any macromolecules formulated in lipid nanoparticles leads to preferential deposition of the payload INTO THE OVARIES.

Combine the propensity to trigger autoimmune destruction from the jabs and the accumulation of payload into the ovaries and it was obvious what the risks were.

Whether problems would actually occur we could not say.

But the theoretical risk was extraordinarily high.

And there was no attempt to derisk the obvious risks by means of reproductive toxicology.

By the way, full package reproductive toxicology studies HAVE STILL NOT BEEN DONE.

Why not? Because, as has been my contention from the very beginning, the design intent of these injections was always to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.

I doubted the aim was to sterilise everyone, because that Wouk’s lead to premature discovery.

I could do nothing more. I had to wait outcomes. I still do.

This study of course is one of many that I’ve long pointed out are routine requirements for even contemplating administration to anyone at or currently below reproductive age, so not to girl children let alone healthy young women (broadly classified as Women Of Childbearing Potential – WOCBP).

Since thalidomide in the eariy 1960s, all new medical interventions have been considered as presumptive reproductive toxins.

Accordingly they are NEVER offered to WOCBP, even if there’s an arguable benefit to them. Even after extensive reproductive toxicology testing has been completed and nothing abnormal detected, new medical interventions are still not recommended. Over time, what’s often termed a “natural experiment” occurs, here being inadvertent administration to WOCBP and yet no hints of reprotox issues arising. That added to a clean reprotox profile usually leads to cautious use in this population. By that time we also have decent data on utility of the medical intervention.

The bottom line is that EVERY doctor knew of this path to cautious use in WOCBP because they’re taught it in medical school. I accuse every doctor who jabbed girls and young women of deliberate assault and they did it for money and to retain their privileges in the system.

They should apologise profoundly and show contrition. Ideally by resigning. People do not need such doctors in the system.

I expect continued radio silence from the vast majority of doctors.

My entire family has zero respect for medical doctors, and this isn’t recoverable in my lifetime, and probably not in my adult children’s lifetime either.

I’m not ever going to shut up about this. Please pick it up and show everyone you know.

Thank you,

Dr Mike Yeadon

Dangerous Games ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

The BSL-4 facility at Fort Detrick is a danger to the American public

MAY 10, 2025

At a BSL-4 high-security risk laboratory located at Fort Detrick, an army base in Frederick, MD, during March 2025 there was a serious incident involving two laboratory workers. It is reported that one of the workers poked holes in the high biocontainment suit of another worker, potentially exposing the latter to at least one dangerous pathogen, although the specific pathogen was not disclosed.

Dr. Richard H. Ebright reports that the NIH BSL-4 facility at Ft. Detrick is contractor-staffed and contractor-operated. So, neither NIH nor military staff were directly involved in the incident. He found evidence that this facility was staffed and operated through a $116 million minority-set-aside contract to a Native Hawaiian LLC contractor located in an office park in Orlando, Florida.

These sorts of contracting arrangements are common in the DoD, and reflect preferential award ranking conferred to companies that are native American-owned, which has resulted in a rather odd business model of shell small minority-owned company prime contractors under which the usual larger contractors operate as subcontractors. The small minority-owned company prime contractor is granted a few years to operate with these special privileges and then typically folds, a new company is formed with the same basic ownership, the special privileges then apply to the newco for the same period, and the cycle repeats itself. This works for the large corporate “subcontractors” as it provides them some legal cover in terms of compliance with burdensome Federal Acquisition Regulation contract terms and conditions. A win-win for all concerned except taxpayer, government, and warfighter.

A BSL-4 laboratory is the highest level of biocontainment designed for work with the most dangerous and exotic pathogens. There are reportedly only fourteen Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories in the United States. The level of training and skill required to work in these labs is extensive, and there are relatively very few people with the skills needed to work directly with such pathogens. Furthermore, Personnel must pass FBI-led security risk assessments (SRAs) to handle Tier 1 agents like anthrax.

These are the types of pathogens housed in the facilities, most are considered tier 1 pathogens, which are considered the most deadly:

These facilities are supposedly for the development of new vaccines, as it is the official narrative that bioweapons research in the United States ended in 1969. Research yielding new technologies or information with the potential for both benevolent and harmful purposes is referred to as “dual-use research.” The justification for bio-weapons research is therefore carefully parsed to suggest that there are alternative, more benign reasons for conducting this research. But the dual-use narrative doesn’t account for the anthrax research that led to the weaponized anthrax spore leaks that were associated with the anthrax attacks in 2001.

What is commonly written about that attack is that the anthrax used was the Ames strain of Bacillus anthracis. This strain is known as a highly virulent laboratory strain that was originally isolated from a cow in Texas in 1981. It is widely used by the U.S. Army for vaccine development and challenge studies due to its potency. Although it was reported that the anthrax was weaponized, there is little information available on why anthrax was being weaponized at Fort Detrick in 2021, which was done so by making it capable of being aerosolized. Once aerosolized, anthrax then becomes a weapon capable of mass destruction via a variety of weapons platforms. Anthrax is relatively easy to weaponize, and has been used in biological attacks globally during the twentieth century.

Following the anthrax attacks of 2001 that resulted in five deaths, Congress significantly strengthened oversight of select agents by passing the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 and the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 requiring HHS & USDA to publish regulations for possession, use, and transfer of select agents. However, these regulations only include requirements for registration, security risk assessments, restricted access, security, biosafety, restricted experiments, incident response, training, transfers, records, inspections, notification of theft, loss, or release, and civil penalties. These regulations are tricky, and a careful analysis suggests that they do not appear to specify what these agents can’t be used for.

The weaponized anthrax was actively being manipulated in 2001 by Dr. Ivins and his staff at Fort Detrick. There is not a chance in heck that making anthrax a respiratory pathogen is necessary for development of a vaccine. Hence, the work being conducted on anthrax in 2001 was not bio-defense or dual-use but bio-weapons research. Those writing of the anthrax attacks at the time somehow miss this logical conclusion. Just what the heck was the army lab doing – making anthrax a weapon of mass destruction?

After this event, Congress appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci to head the BSL-4 laboratory at Fort Detrick, which was repositioned under NIAID, and in compensation for this added responsibility awarded him a substantial raise with specific pay adjustments for his biodefense-related work. When he retired in 2024, he was earning almost half a million dollars a year.

So, what was and is now going on at the BSL-4 lab at Fort Detrick lab is anyone’s guess.

Fast forward to this year’s “incident.” An incident that potentially could have resulted in a mass casualty event. This criminal act was not disclosed to the head of NIH, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, until weeks after it occurred. When he was alerted (after the fact), he closed down the laboratory and announced the incident to the press.

The titillating aspect of this crime is that this was a “lover’s spat.” The two co-workers involved were in a toxic relationship that had turned sour. But how is it even possible that a person with advanced safety training in BSL-4 laboratory techniques and having passed the FBI’s pass FBI-led security risk assessments, surreptitiously poke holes in another’s containment suit?

Now, we don’t know what pathogens they were working on, but… At the very least, this should have triggered a police investigation and arrest.

If the intent was to cause serious bodily harm, the accused should face charges of aggravated assault or assault with a deadly weapon, both of which are felonies. If the pathogen(s) being worked with were deadly, charges might have even included attempted manslaughter or murder, even attempted mass murder. Of note, Dr. Richard Ebright asserts on X that the co-worker did try to murder the other worker.

However, a search of arrest records or reports from Frederick County, MD, reveals no such arrest records. Which certainly makes one wonder. What the heck is going on at that military base?

The incident is not isolated; it is part of a broader pattern of safety lapses at Fort Detrick, with additional (details undisclosed) incidents reported in 2024. These repeated breaches have highlighted what officials and outside experts carefully describe as a “poor culture of safety” at the facility. Problems cited include poor documentation of select agents (dangerous pathogens), discrepancies between inventory logs and actual stock levels, and a general lack of psychological screening for personnel handling high-risk materials.

In 2019, CDC Director Robert Redfield closed Fort Detrick after an inspection revealed leaks and mechanical issues in a newly installed chemical system meant for decontaminating wastewater at the facility. These safety concerns heightened worries about possible releases of dangerous biological agents, leading the CDC to pause research activities at the site until the problems were addressed.

The details of the shutdown were not publicly disclosed at the time, with the CDC citing national security as the reason for keeping information about the closure private. This lack of transparency raised public concern and prompted requests for more information regarding possible health and safety risks associated with the laboratory. The facility reopened by the end of March 2020 (!! Key date relevant to the COVID timeline) after resolving the remaining wastewater issues.

Notably and admittedly a rabbit hole, but some of the above research was sourced from CHAT-GPT3. So, as usual, the references were reviewed to weed out the propaganda. The main reference source that emerged was the official newspaper of the CCP. For a mind-blowing exercise of alternate reality theories to the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, read that article linked above and then the following article titled: “Politicians told to stay out of virus origins debate.” Notably, several inaccuracies are present in those articles, including the claim that the USA has never ratified the bioweapons convention and is the only country not to do so. Once one finds such errors, the entire document becomes suspect.

Back to the story at hand…

Dr. Bhattacharya, Director of NIH, wrote on X that the

“ongoing investigation revealed a pattern — going back to the Biden administration — of safety not taken as seriously as it ought. So with Sec. Kennedy’s blessing, I immediately ordered all work to halt & all dangerous pathogens secured. I won’t reopen the lab until I am satisfied that it can be done with zero risk to public safety. No more lab-generated pandemics!”

It is unclear when NIH will give the green light to reopen this BSL-4 laboratory, but this event is yet another warning signal that bio-defense and bio-weapons research must be largely shut down.

What we do know is that in this instance, NIH acted quickly and responsibly to not only address the issue but to alert the American people transparently. Or as transparently as a classified incident such as this can be reported on.

It is time to not only end all gain-of-function, it is time to stop dangerous dual-use research, which includes both bio-defense and bio-weapons development. Human beings are imperfect, become psychologically unhinged from time to time, and can be prone to a wide range of dangerous instincts and actions. Highly pathogenic organisms and high-pressure scientific research have repeatedly led to containment “errors” and mistakes that put the entire population at risk.

Is the juice really worth the squeeze?

Read previous articles

Total Page Visits: 332 - Today Page Visits: 2

KrakenNews.us

Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 5/22/25

About the author

About the author

Related Posts