COVID-19 /Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter you batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
NO WONDER they tried to KILL HIM: Watch Slovakian PM’s stunning talks against the WHO, vaccines, covid testing: BRUCHA WEISBERGER
Robert Fico is a huge threat to the globalist cartel.
BS”D
MAY 24, 2024 – I just watched two of Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico’s fearless speeches: the 4-minute speech from January, in which he announced the formation of an investigative commission into the covid vaccine, testing, and related corruption in Slovakia, and a shorter talk from last November, in which he decried the vaccines, the Pharma-WHO cartel and their “Pandemic Accord,” and more.
It was shocking and wonderfully exhilarating to see how bluntly a leader actually called out the “covid circus.” I really think that the whole world needs to hear what this almost-assassinated head of state was saying.
Here’s the January talk [4:09]
Knowing that many people don’t watch the videos in articles, I transcribed the English subtitles from Mr. Fico’s January speech here:
“Ladies and Gentlemen of the Progressive Slovakia and the Opposition, have you seen the statistics on how our deaths from various cardiovascular events have risen because of vaccinations?
But you reject it, of course you reject it, you claim that vaccination was the best thing in the world.
What do you know about how many expired vaccines we have left and how much money has been wasted?
Dr. James Thorp: “585 Million Global Citizens Killed or Injured From the COVID-19 “Vaccines” By James Thorp MD
Top OBGYN issued a formal notice to the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, the American Board of ObGyn, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
MAR 10, 2024 – Notice to the Board of Directors and/or Officers of the following Organizations, American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists ACOG.org, American Board of ObGyn ABOG.org, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine SMFM.org
You are placed on formal notice. You must call for an immediate moratorium on the use of the COVID-19 “Vaccines” in pregnancy or you will be subject to Civil and/or Criminal charges for negligence, intent to harm, assault/battery, and murder.
There is now overwhelming published literature of over 3000 peer-reviewed medical journal articles associating death and injuries from these alleged vaccines that the most recent AJOG article admits are in fact gene therapies.
ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM you appear to have colluded not only with yourselves but also to have received what appears to be large sums of money from HHS / CDC entering into apparent illegal cooperative care contracts and you have threatened your constituents to adhere to your lethal and injurious vaccine pushing narrative under threats of punitive actions.
This is a clear violation of the first amendment.
The recent published literature regarding implications of the Vaccine mRNA and potential for it being reversed transcribed permanently into the human genome mandates an immediate global moratorium on the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.
The overwhelming literature published- well in excess of 3000 manuscripts documenting the death and severe injuries from the COVID-19 “vaccines” necessitates an IMMEDIATE GLOBAL MORATORIUM.
Best estimates are 585 million global citizens killed or injured from the COVID-19 “vaccines” and you have inflicted massive harm to pregnant women, preborns, and newborns on a global scale.
ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM, you have ignored the overwhelming evidence for far too long and you must immediately call for a moratorium on the use of these investigational dangerous products in pregnancy or face civil and/or criminal charges.
From 1962 to Now – Is This ’14x’ Why Everyone’s Getting Sicker? Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
Childhood Vaccine Schedule Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human History’
May 22, 2024 – It’s the greatest decline in public health in human history, but what’s causing it? Is it because we’re now dishing out 14x the doses of this than we were in 1962 – and why do public health agencies refuse to study the health outcomes?
Childhood Vaccine Schedule Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human History’
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- A U.S. Senate roundtable discussion, hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson, tackled a taboo topic — why public health agencies have not studied the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children
- In 1962, children received just five vaccine doses. As of 2023, children up to age 18 receive 73 doses of 16 different vaccines; the cumulative effects of this childhood vaccine schedule have never been tested
- Research shows vaccinated children experienced significantly higher instances of various health issues, including allergies, asthma, behavioral issues and gastroenteritis
- The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to report on vaccine safety every two years, but the agency has “never submitted a vaccine safety report to Congress”
- Health agencies have data on health outcomes for vaccinated and unvaccinated children, but they refuse to make it public, likely due to financial conflicts of interest
Whistleblower Claims Race-Based Admissions Have Turned UCLA into a ‘Failed Medical School’ — Elon Musk Warns of Risking Patient Lives with Incompetent Doctors By Jim Hᴏft
May 23, 2024 7:00 pm – A whistleblower has come forward with explosive claims that race-based admissions policies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) have severely degraded the quality of its medical school, prompting a stern warning from tech mogul Elon Musk about the potential for patient deaths due to medical incompetence.
Long hailed as a premier institution, UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine has seen a precipitous drop in its standards, according to damning evidence and interviews conducted by the Washington Free Beacon.
The institution, which annually attracts up to 14,000 applicants, accepted just 173 in 2023, a record-low acceptance rate of 1.3 percent. The median matriculant took difficult science courses in college, earned a 3.8 GPA, and scored in the 88th percentile on the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT).
In November 2021, during a typical admissions committee meeting, concerns were raised about an African American applicant whose academic credentials significantly lagged behind UCLA’s stringent standards.
Elon Musk, the tech mogul known for his outspoken opinions on social issues, reacted strongly to these developments.
“People will die if doctors misdiagnose patients,” Musk tweeted.
Jennifer Lucero, the dean of admissions, vehemently argued that the candidate’s lower scores were inconsequential given the need for doctors who represent diverse backgrounds.
“Did you not know African-American women are dying at a higher rate than everybody else?” Lucero reportedly challenged, emphasizing the importance of diversity over traditional metrics of academic excellence.
According to sources within the university, since Lucero’s tenure began, there has been a noticeable decline in the performance of students on standardized tests essential for their medical careers.
The whistleblower pointed out that some students admitted under these revised criteria were unable to perform basic medical procedures or diagnose common conditions during their rotations. More than 50% of certain cohorts have failed their basic exams.
The whistleblower claims are supported by internal emails and performance data revealing that under Lucero’s tenure, UCLA’s ranking plummeted from 6th to 18th in U.S. News & World Report’s list for medical research.
Several admissions officials allege that race is often discussed explicitly in admissions decisions despite California’s legal bans on such practices. This has led to accusations against Lucero and her office of lowering admission standards for certain racial groups while maintaining high barriers for others.
It can be recalled that the Supreme Court ruled last year that the Harvard and UNC race-based affirmative action programs are unconstitutional. Schools nationwide will no longer be able to discriminate against students on the basis of race.
All but eight states used race-based affirmative action. The states that did have affirmative action at all prior to the ruling were California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, Arizona, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Idaho
Last October, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two separate cases about the consideration of race in college admissions: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard University.
At stake in the Harvard case was whether the university violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against Asian-American applicants. The UNC case concerned the school’s unwillingness to adopt a “race-neutral alternative.”
PREVENTION
TREATMENT
I-CARE: Early COVID Treatment
I-CARE: For Kids
I-CARE: RSV and Flu Treatment
MATH+ COVID Hospital Treatment
RECOVERY
I-RECOVER: Post-Vaccine Treatment
I-RECOVER: Long COVID Treatment
NON COVID RELATED PROTOCOLS
Brain Health
Sepsis Care
Eat Well: Guide To Fasting and Healthy Eating
I-CARE: Insulin Resistance
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
- Shedding of Covid mRNA
Efficacy of Ivermectin
Nutritional Therapeutics and COVID-19
Vitamins and Nutraceuticals During Pregnancy
Nutrient Guide
Traducciones de Nuestros Protocolos en Español
Frequently Asked Questions
Feds suspend, propose personal funding ban on Peter Daszak of Wuhan funder EcoHealth Alliance [HEARING VIDEO 3:34:40] By Greg Piper
Follows suspension and proposed debarment of EcoHealth Alliance itself. COVID subcommittee says it won’t “shield him from accountability” for potentially lying under oath.
May 22, 2024 11:35am – The Department of Health and Human Services followed its suspension and proposed debarment of EcoHealth Alliance, which passed through taxpayer money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a suspected source of COVID-19, by doing the same for its president, Peter Daszak, a week later.
The only difference between the documents invoked to justify the immediate and proposed permanent funding bans in the May 15 and May 21 notification letters to EcoHealth and Daszak, respectively, appears to be that the latter references the former.
The letter Tuesday and the formal “action referral memorandum,” made public Wednesday by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, is from a redacted “Suspension and Debarment Official and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisitions.”
It tells Daszak the suspension and proposed permanent funding ban is “related to your respective roles” as EcoHealth president as well as program director and principal investigator on a National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease grant to study “the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.”
Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup said in a press release Wednesday he called for Daszak’s personal debarment at a hearing last week with NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak and the subcommittee issued a report two weeks earlier on Daszak’s “flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and his willful violation of the terms of his NIH grant.”
This “will ensure [Daszak] never again receives a single cent from U.S. taxpayers nor has the opportunity to start a new, untrustworthy organization,” but it “does not shield him from accountability” for potentially lying under oath “about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his compliance with NIH grant procedures,” The Ohio lawmaker said.
The White Coat Waste Project, which took credit for focusing scrutiny on EcoHealth four years ago, said Daszak was “the latest domino to fall but shouldn’t be the last” in the funding of “wasteful and reckless virus hunting and animal experimentation that can cause pandemics and create bioweapons.”
Senior Vice President Justin Goodman noted its investigation found NIH gave $8 million in 2021 and 2023 to build a new bat lab at Colorado State University supplied with infected bats via the EcoHealth Alliance, which WCW dubbed “Wuhan West.”
Is it the Jab or the Virus? Male & Female Infertility in a Post COVID World is Very Real! (VIDEOS) By Grant Stinchfield
May 22, 2024 10:00 am – Men and women worldwide wish they had never taken the mRNA experimental vaccine. Numerous studies are proving that the now infamous “Spike Protein” is having a negative effect on male sperm counts as well as female fertility .
Overwhelmingly, mainstream medical journals are publishing studies confirming the decrease in fertility levels and even the increase in miscarriages in a post-COVID world. What is not surprising is their all out quest to blame the virus, not the vaccine.
Jonathan Pollard: Health Data You May Not Have Seen [5:39] Machon Shilo
May 21, 2024 – Discussion between former Prisoner of Zion, Jonathan Pollard and the head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim
NIH official finally admits taxpayers funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan — after years of denials By Josh Christenson
May 16, 2024, 3:11 p.m. ET – It’s about time!
At long last, National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak admitted to Congress Thursday that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the months and years before the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?”
“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”
The response comes after more than four years of evasions from federal public health officials — including Tabak himself and former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci — about the controversial research practice that modifies viruses to make them more infectious.
Tabak added that “this is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.”
Dr. Bryce Nickels, a professor of genetics at Rutgers University and co-founder of the pandemic oversight group Biosafety Now, told The Post the exchange “was two people talking past each other.”
“Tabak was engaging in the usual obfuscation and semantic manipulation that is so frustrating and pointless,” Nickels said, adding that the NIH bigwig was resisting accountability for risky research that can create pathogens of pandemic potential.
“Instead of addressing this directly, Tabak launched into a useless response about how ‘gain-of-function’ encompasses many types of experiments,” he added.
In July 2023, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) barred the Wuhan Institute of Virology from receiving federal grants for the next 10 years.
EcoHealth Alliance, whose mission statement declares it is “working to prevent pandemics,” had all of its grant funding pulled by HHS for the next three years on Tuesday.
EcoHealth Alliance president Dr. Peter Daszak, in a hearing earlier this month before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, testified that his organization “never has and did not do gain-of-function research, by definition.”
But that claim directly contradicted Daszak’s private correspondence, including a 2016 email in which he celebrated the end of an Obama administration pause on gain-of-function research.
The EcoHealth head was also called out in sworn testimony to the COVID panel by Dr. Ralph Baric, a leading coronavirologist who initiated the research himself and declared it was “absolutely” gain-of-function.
‘Never Have Smoking Guns:’ Bombshell Messages Reveal Fauci’s Right Hand Man Bragged About Deleting Emails To Hide Covid Lab Leak Theory by Jordyn M.
May 21, 2024 – A new damning revelation sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill last week, as lawmakers delved into the origins of Covid-19.
Key advisor to Anthony Fauci Dr. David Morens shockingly showcased the manipulation of electronic correspondence to evade scrutiny, as evident in unearthed emails, which has sparked an uproar online.
Morens, a prominent government health official who served as a senior advisor to Fauci from 1998 until 2022, found himself at the center of controversy as excerpts from his emails were laid bare during a hearing chaired by House Oversight Chairman James Comer.
These disclosures come as part of the ongoing congressional investigation into the hypothesis that the Covid-19 virus might have escaped from a laboratory in China, Daily Mail reported.
Among the startling revelations were exchanges wherein Morens, currently employed at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), discussed strategies for circumventing transparency laws, particularly the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Ex-CDC Director Says It’s High Time To Admit ‘Significant Side Effects’ Of COVID-19 Vaccines by Tom Ozimek
MONDAY, MAY 20, 2024 – 04:11 AM (Epoch Times) – Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said Thursday that many officials who tried to warn the public about potential problems with COVID-19 vaccines were pressured into silence and that it’s high time to admit that there were “significant” side effects that made people sick.
Dr. Redfield made the remarks in a May 16 interview with Chris Cuomo on NewsNation, during which he lamented the loss of public confidence in public health agencies because of a lack of transparency around the vaccines, which he said “saved a lot of lives” but also made some people “quite ill.”
“Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines … we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines, because they were afraid that that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated,” Dr. Redfield said.
Federal Court Strikes Down Colorado University’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate as Unconstitutional By Jim Hᴏft
May 19, 2024 9:40 pm – In a landmark decision earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit delivered a scathing rebuke to the University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, declaring its COVID-19 vaccine mandate unconstitutional.
The 55-page ruling highlighted that the mandate, which excluded religious exemptions, was tainted by “religious animus” and thus violated the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberties.
The court’s decision reversed a prior ruling by a lower court, bringing to an end a contentious legal battle initiated by the Thomas More Society on behalf of 17 faculty members and students.
These individuals had faced severe repercussions, including dismissals and expulsions, for their refusal to comply with the university’s vaccine policies due to their deeply held religious beliefs.
In September 2021, under its controversial policy, the University of Colorado mandated COVID-19 vaccination for all individuals accessing its facilities or participating in its programs, with strictly limited exemptions. Legal challenges were quickly mounted as affected parties claimed that their rights to religious freedom were being infringed upon.
“Thomas More Society attorneys filed their lawsuit in September 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the University of Colorado, the chancellor of the Anschutz School of Medicine and the school’s senior associate dean of medical education. The original lawsuit was filed for a Catholic doctor and a Buddhist student, who were unable to take the vaccine due to their sincerely and deeply held religious convictions, and in October 2021, over a dozen additional staff and students were added to the lawsuit. They are seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney’s fees against the University for its unlawful discrimination and violations of fundamental constitutional rights,” Thomas More Society said in its press release.
Peter Breen, Executive Vice President and Head of Litigation at the Thomas More Society, expressed vindication, stating, “The University of Colorado ran roughshod overstaff and students of faith during COVID, and the Court of Appeals has now declared plainly what we’ve fought to establish for almost three years: the University acted with ‘religious animus’ and flagrantly violated the fundamental religious liberties of these brave healthcare providers and students. These medical providers were hailed as heroes, as they served bravely on the front lines through the worst of the pandemic, but when their religious principles conflicted with the beliefs of University of Colorado bureaucrats, these heroes were callously tossed aside.”
“With this ruling in favor of our clients, the Court of Appeals has made clear that people of faith are not second-class citizens—they are deserving of full respect and the protection of the United States Constitution in their free exercise of religion. By unlawfully and intrusively probing our staff and students’ religious beliefs, the University rendered value judgments that not only reeked of religious bigotry but violated our clients’ constitutional rights, as well as basic decency. We are grateful for this strong court decision in favor of religious liberty.
“The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that no government entity has the right to appoint itself as a doctrinal tribunal that defines which religious beliefs count as deeply and sincerely held and deem those religious beliefs valid or invalid. We are also encouraged that this ruling reaffirms and strengthens our bedrock First Amendment protections for countless many others into the future,” Breen said.
The court’s findings included shocking revelations of how the university administration made arbitrary decisions on what constitutes a legitimate religious belief.
Ex-CDC Director Admits ‘Significant Side Effects’ of COVID Vaccines in Young Healthy People — Calls for Independent Review Similar to 9/11 Commission (VIDEO) By Jim Hᴏft
May 18, 2024 10:00 pm – Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has come forward with serious allegations against health agencies, claiming they suppressed information about significant side effects of COVID-19 vaccines in younger populations.
Dr. Robert Redfield worked as CDC director from 2018 to January 2021.
According to Dr. Redfield, the potential risks associated with the vaccines were deliberately downplayed, which has led to severe health complications for some individuals.
During a televised discussion with Chris Cuomo, a COVID vaccine-injured himself, Dr. Redfield expressed his concerns about the lack of transparency from major public health institutions such as the NIH, FDA, and CDC.
Dr. Redfield suggested the establishment of an independent review commission, akin to the post-9/11 commission, to thoroughly investigate the decisions made during the pandemic across both the previous and current administrations.
Below is the transcript:
IT WAS ALL A LIE: Former NIH Director Admits There Was No Evidence For ‘Social Distancing’ During COVID Pandemic By Ben Kew
May 18, 2024 1:40 pm – During the COVID-19 pandemic, one could not go five minutes without hearing the phrase “social distancing.”
The theory, according to the country’s leading scientific “experts,” was that by keeping a distance of six feet from one another, one could successfully protect the vulnerable from the COVID virus and save millions of lives.
Now it turns out it was all a lie.
Francis Collins, the former director of the National Insitute of Health, admitted in a closed-door interview earlier this year that he did not see any scientific evidence that social distancing was a proven method of containing the virus.
The Federalist reported:
On March 22, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued what amounted to placebo guidance advising Americans to avoid mass gatherings and remain at least six feet apart from each other. The businesses the government deemed essential — the supermarkets, the pharmacies, the big-box retailers — marked the dividing lines, two yards between life and death, on the floors and in checkout lines.
But Collins and crew, including the smug and self-righteous Dr. Anthony Fauci, the immunologist who ran the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for a dangerously long time, made a very good living segregating a society at an unprecedented level. The damage done from the scientists’ sign-off on a long and cruel isolation experiment will take a long time to fully measure.
“The six feet of separation recommendation had real life consequences. This guideline made it nearly impossible for schools nationwide to re-open due to the pressure from teachers unions to follow this guideline. In addition, businesses had to adapt at great cost or risk complete closure,” states a Thursday subcommittee staff memo on the Collins interview.
Then comes the crux of the interview:
But the government-imposed individual internment camps were all worth it, right? Social distancing, plus deeply flawed vaccines, prevented 800,000 deaths, headlines last week proclaimed. But when asked whether he believed any science or evidence supported the six-feet rule, Collins said he did not.
“Is that I do not recall or I do not see any evidence supporting six feet?” a Covid subcommittee staff member asked the good doctor. “I did not see evidence, but I’m not sure I would have been shown evidence at that point,” Collins replied.
But what about four years later? “Since then, it has been an awfully large topic. Have you seen any evidence since then supporting six feet?” the staffer asked.
No,” the former NIH director conceded.
So there you have it. Time and time again those of us, including The Gateway Pundit, who questioned every aspect of the COVID pandemic, from the lockdown regimes and mask mandates all the way through to vaccines and potential treatments, have been proven correct.
There was never any scientific basis for the decisions that were taken, although the political, societal and economic consequences were enormous.
As the famous Francis Bacon quotes goes, “Truth is the daughter of time, not of authority.”
[Ed.: Wait! I have a good reason for social distancing! They were democrats! I am social distancing today more than before the scamdemic, and it’s a lot more than 6 feet!!]
