COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal recourse is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org
How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
BREAKING: Pfizer Busted Using Irrelevant Study to Deny Genome Integration Risks from Their mRNA Injections NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Pfizer ignores four independent sources showing mRNA-DNA interaction—cites a completely unrelated paper on SARS-CoV-2 evolution to deny genome alteration risks.
JUN 28, 2025
On Pfizer’s official website, there’s a page titled “The Facts,” where the company claims to combat “misinformation and disinformation.”
One of the FAQ questions reads: “Does an mRNA vaccine change your DNA?”
Pfizer claims—without any doubt—that mRNA shots don’t interact with DNA at all. So, you’d expect footnote #9 to cite a robust and relevant study…
Instead, Pfizer was caught citing a paper on a completely unrelated topic.
Footnote #9 refers to “The Evolution of SARS-CoV-2”—a paper that has absolutely NO relevance to whether mRNA injections alter DNA or interact with the genome.
What Mass Vaccination Has Done to Our Children: The Forgotten History of Neurological Vaccine Injuries, the Deaths, & the Hidden Story of Immune Damage BRUCHA WEISBERGER
Lives are being silently destroyed every single day.
JUN 25, 2025
BS”D
In this post I am synthesizing the recent articles of retired pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas MD, of Dr. Pierre Kory MD, and of A Midwestern Doctor MD, whose work was republished by Dr. Mercola.
Part 1: Oregon pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas ran a study comparing the health of two groups of children in his practice: those who were vaccinated on a more spaced-out schedule which he had designed, and those whose parents chose to forgo vaccines altogether. Dr. Thomas found that without question, the unvaccinated children were much healthier. Unfortunately for him, his medial license was yanked and his career ended as a result of this “inconvenient” data emerging. Dr. Thomas now writes:
Doctors who care for the unvaccinated—and those who live with vaccine harm, effects, or side effects—know all too well that the health of the unvaccinated is far superior to that of the vaccinated. Unvaccinated children suffer from less chronic disease, less autism, fewer learning and neurodevelopmental issues. They are also far less likely to have asthma, allergies, allergic rhinitis, eczema, and autoimmune conditions.
The most surprising finding from my data—and the data of several others—is that the unvaccinated are significantly less likely to suffer from infections, including ear, lung, sinus, skin, eye, and intestinal infections, as well as infections overall. And when the unvaccinated do get sick, they recover more quickly, and the severity of their illnesses is lower than that of their vaccinated peers.
Here are Dr. Paul Thomas’s research presentations and supporting materials. You can watch his video HERE
Please follow Dr. Paul Thomas. Here’s his full article
Part 2: Dr. Pierre Kory recently completed an investigation into the deaths on the same night of previously healthy twins, a week after their vaccinations:
Medical Record Review Of the Twins Who Died After Vaccination And A Review Of The Literature Proving SIDS Is Caused By Vaccines
BW: I am very traumatized by the story of the deaths of these twins. I can’t even bring myself to read Dr. Kory’s whole article. I’m republishing part of it here. Click the link below for the rest.
Dr. Kory: Tyson and Dallas Shaw were found dead in their crib at 18 months of age.
As my regular readers are aware, last month, Children’s Health Defense asked me to review the hospital records of two young Mennonite girls in Texas who died from what the hospital and our Pharma-controlled media claimed was the measles.
In that post, I provided the evidence from the medical records that, contrary to the fear-mongering Pharma-media hype, their deaths were not from measles but stemmed from a staggering, near criminal cascade of medical incompetence, repeatedly botching the treatment of routine bacterial pneumonias—one of the most basic conditions hospitals face daily.
Instead, those so-called “measles deaths” fueled a colossal media disinformation blitz, falsely branding measles as a deadly scourge to terrorize parents into vaccinating their children. As a physician who has devoted five years of my life and career (at significant personal and professional costs) to combating scientific Disinformation campaigns (ivermectin, Covid vaccines, chlorine dioxide, IV vitamin C, among others), attacking the immense, decades-long Disinformation campaign supporting childhood vaccines is my latest endeavor.
The immense anger that this one triggers in me sets itself apart from the others, mainly because the children are defenseless, have no voice or agency, and innumerable of their lives are either ended like the Shaw twins or destroyed with life-long chronic illnesses, the saddest of which is severe autism (known by the CDC), relegating them to lives of dependence upon their parents for care without the ability to have hobbies, careers, marriages, friends etc.
So, moving from the lie that measles is dangerous or deadly (it is not), let’s now examine the lie that childhood vaccines do not cause SIDS. What you will learn about the lethality of vaccines to infants (those under one year old) will shock you, as it shocked me.
The tragic cases of the Idaho twins rip apart the insidious myth that vaccines are “safe and effective.” Nothing could be further from the truth. It’s utterly maddening that countless parents remain oblivious to the damning evidence, blindly marching their precious infants to pediatricians for so-called “well-baby visits”—a ritual that, for some, is tantamount to delivering them to an executioner. Too extreme? Read the rest of this post, and then you can make an informed judgment as to the soundness of that statement.
Here, I first present my review of the medical records of the Shaw twins in Idaho. I will then follow with a literature review proving that the epidemic of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), which began in the 1960s, is almost entirely caused by vaccination. I think you will be as troubled, horrified, and angered by what you learn as I was when I started to delve into the data.
Dallas and Tyson Shaw died on the night of the 7th day following their 18th-month well-baby visit, where they received five vaccinations during that visit – DTaP, Influenza, and Hep A.
Dallas and Tyson were fraternal twins who were born prematurely at 29 weeks (“moderately pre-term”) after Mom went into labor about a week before. Tyson was in breech position, thus emergency c/section was performed.
Fast forward to their 18-month wellness visit – they were generally healthy, typically developed children for their corrected age, with no issues with hearing or vision. They had also received all the ACIP-recommended vaccines up to that point, although at the time of the visit, they were “behind on DTaP for 3 months,” until they both received them on the fateful day of 4/23/25.
Per Mom re: getting the vaccines that day:
“Yes, my mother-in-law was with me, and we both had a concern, specifically about the flu shot, because their father’s side of the family, they all have bad reactions or are allergic to the flu shot, and they always get a nasal infection. And she said that they would be okay. She also mentioned that, prior to receiving the vaccines that day, “they were just normal, perfect, happy little babies.”
After the visit and the vaccines:
“They were okay. I think they took a nap when we got home because they seemed tired. But for the rest of the evening, it was business as usual. We ate dinner, they played with us and their dad, and it was okay that day.”
Mom then described them the next day when they woke up:
“That’s the day that they woke up, and when they walked out of their room because they were walking, Tyson walked just about to the beginning of my… Right into the entrance of my living room, and just lay down and wouldn’t get up. Dallas, the best she could, ran to me because I was sitting on the living room floor getting ready to change their diapers. And Dallas ran to me and she lay on me and she felt heavy and she didn’t want to leave me, but she seemed tired. I changed her diaper, and I noticed that the typical toddler pot belly was gone. She was skinny. She looked tired. She was almost falling asleep while I was changing her. And when I had moved her out of the way so I could then change her brother, she just lay on the carpet in the living room and wouldn’t move or get up. And her eyes kept rolling back like she was trying to go back to sleep.”
“.. there was a green diarrhea in her diaper, as well as Tyson’s. Tyson, I had to go and pick him up from where he had lain down at the entrance of my living room and change him. And he was also skinny. He looked a little worse. His eyes were sunken back, with dark circles. They both had a blue tinge to their mouths. And when I would try to pull their lip down to look at it, it was as if their lip was trying to glue itself closed, if that makes sense.
So after I changed their diapers, I watched them for maybe a minute to see if they perked up, maybe. And then I immediately called my mother-in-law because she lives just down the street. And I told her, We need to send these kids to the ER. This is not okay. And she got off the phone with me. I tried to get in touch with him at work to let him know what we were doing. And then I video-called my mom because I felt like I was going crazy a little bit, because they didn’t look right. I thought, ‘This isn’t okay, right?’ I video-called my mom, and she was like, “Yeah, you’re taking those kids to the ER. They look like they are dying.”
The children were immediately taken to the ER on that day, 4/24/25, with documented complaints of “warmth” and “decreased activity.” The ER doc documented that it was “likely a reaction to immunization,” but the chart also included a viral URI in the differential diagnosis. Sent home AFTER GETTING TYLENOL ( a risk factor for death, which I will not explore in this post for the sake of brevity).
Mom:
He said that he’d give them both Tylenol and that he’d give them both Popsicles, and have them sit and eat the Popsicles to see if they’d throw up. And then if they hadn’t, we would go home.
They did not throw up, and we were sent home.
“They were mostly the same, except they just wanted to sleep. They slept with me on the couch. They lay on me and slept on the couch. They didn’t eat. They wouldn’t drink out of their sippy cups. And they still had diarrhea. Tyson threw up a couple more times after the ER visit that day.
Per Father: “I was in disbelief that just so quickly, within a matter of 24 hours, the kids went from perfectly happy, go-lucky active babies to looking like they were dying.”
I can’t read/copy more of the story. 😭
Continued, Dr. Kory:
MY IMPRESSION AS TO THE CAUSE OF DEATH OF THE SHAW TWINS
IMPRESSION: Sudden death from severe apnea caused by recent vaccination at 18-month wellness visit. The underlying pathophysiology was likely due to micro-strokes and/or neuroinflammation in the respiratory control center in the brainstem, with micro-strokes caused by “blood sludging/clumping” from loss of zeta-potential due to the inflammatory and or hypercoagulable components of the vaccines.
The deaths occurred on the night of Day 7 post-vaccination, a time when apnea episodes spike post-vaccination as per this carefully done study from 1991.
In that study, they placed a sophisticated microprocessor under the mattresses of infants to precisely measure their breathing patterns before and after pertussis vaccination. Know that apnea = complete cessation of breathing and hypopnea = overly shallow or slow breathing. Note the y-axis measures these episodes in the… 1000s.
From Miller: “The data revealed that pertussis vaccination caused an inordinate increase in episodes where breathing either nearly ceased or stopped completely.”
One of the most damning and disturbing aspects of the data presented above is the frequency of apneas in the days leading up to vaccination – minimal and stable, setting an inconsequential background rate. Then, suddenly, vaccination occurs, and there is a tripling of the apnea/hypopnea rate on that day. However, this is nothing compared to 2 days after vaccination, when the rate literally explodes, only to rapidly decrease and then explode again on days 5-7. Although the graph above ends on Day 7, the study found that these episodes continued for several weeks post-vaccination before returning to baseline.
In a recent discussion with Steve Kirsch, he astuteley pointed out that the bimodal pattern of deaths indicate that it is likely that two different pathophysiologies are occurring – I would hypothesize that the early spikes are from acute neuroinflammation in the brain stem and the later spikes from “micro-clotting” or “blood sludging” leading to brain stem ischemia (the arteries in that region in infants are very small and or tortuous). Or vice versa. Doesn’t matter, this is the reason why infants die at such high rates on these days, because it strongly correlates with the dates of deaths observed post vaccination. In a review of all infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1999 to 2019:
- Of the 2605 infant deaths, 58 % clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 78.3 % within 7 days post-vaccination.
- Of the 1048 SIDS cases, 51 % clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 75.5 % within 7 days post-vaccination
…. it is worth noting that these associations have been reported repeatedly in smaller clusters of observations by astute researchers and pediatricians over the past 100 years.
You can go to Dr. Kory’s article for the rest: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/medical-record-review-of-the-twins
The twins’ story is similar but different to another child’s story posted on social media by her mother. Thank G-d this child made it out alive. The gaslighting that the parents faced from the doctors involved is very instructive.
Part 3: A Midwestern Doctor, as summarized in Dr. Mercola’s post, documents that neurological damage from vaccination used to be widely acknowledged and reported, until the censorship clamped down:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Neurological injuries from vaccination have been documented since the smallpox vaccine over two centuries ago, with severe injuries reported throughout medical literature
- The medical profession concealed these injuries, believing public vaccination benefits justified hiding information that might create vaccine hesitancy
- Historical injuries like spreading paralysis mirror current “one in a million” vaccine injuries, but toxicity documentation was erased to preserve the “safe and effective” narrative
- In the past, these injuries were widely reported, but now research into them is widely censored
- Many of these forgotten reports are critical for understanding modern “inexplicable” conditions like autism
From birth, we are taught that vaccines were one of the most remarkable discoveries in history, and were so safe and effective that many now unimaginable plagues vanished with few to no side effects occurring in the process. In truth, give or take, every part of that mythology is false, and remarkably similar vaccine disasters occur every few decades.
Much of this results from the fact that it is very difficult to produce safe vaccines due to both their mode of action and the methods used in their production. As such, the best “solution” which could be found to this problem was to insist in lockstep that vaccines were safe and erase any memory that vaccine disasters had in fact occurred, thereby making it possible to gaslight anyone who was severely injured by a vaccine and claim their injury was just anecdotal or a product of anti-vaccine hysteria.
For example, recently I discussed how vaccines cause autism, and focused on a central argument used to debunk the link between the two — that the only reason people believe vaccines cause autism is because a disgraced British doctor published a fraudulent 1998 study claiming they did and then made everyone start hallucinating that vaccine injuries were occurring.
This mythology however, ignores that brain injuries were a longstanding problem of vaccination. For example, a 1982 NBC news program (which can be viewed here) revealed that many parents were having children develop “post-pertussis encephalopathy” after taking the DPT vaccine, that most doctors refused to report this, and that:
“Medical knowledge about severe reactions to the whooping cough vaccine goes back to the early 1930s. Report after report has been published in medical journals since then. In 1948,1 two American doctors reported on case histories of many children who had been brain damaged or died from DPT vaccines in Boston. The following year,2 another doctor surveyed pediatricians across the country and found still more. Those studies have been forgotten.”
Likewise, in 1985, one of the most popular talk shows in America (the Donahue show) hosted a segment where doctors from both sides (and neurologically injured members of the audience) debated the risks and benefits of vaccination and the ethics of mandates (which can be viewed here). To the best of my knowledge, this was the last time an open debate of vaccination aired on mainstream television.
There is much, much more information in the article but I’m reaching the “email limit.” Please see the rest here
Please see and share these very important articles I previously published about the severe neurological harms caused by vaccines:
https://truth613.substack.com/p/why-do-all-vaccines-cause-harm-exploring
https://truth613.substack.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done
17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Comprehensive literature review reveals how mRNA injections may induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancer through 17 distinct pathways.
JUN 24, 2025
A comprehensive literature review by Mathilde Debord titled “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to over 100 studies” was just published in Le Point Critique. Drawing from over 100 peer-reviewed studies, it outlines 17 distinct biological mechanisms by which the injections may initiate, accelerate, or reactivate malignant processes.
Below is a summary of the 17 mechanisms identified (the references supporting these statements can be found in the article):
1. Genome Instability
mRNA may be reverse-transcribed and integrated into host DNA, triggering mutations that initiate cancer.
2. Immune Escape
The spike protein binds and inhibits tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA1, shielding cancer cells from immune destruction.
3. Impaired DNA Repair Mechanism
The spike protein interferes with essential DNA repair enzymes, increasing the risk of unchecked mutations.
4. Chronic Inflammation
Lipid nanoparticles and spike protein cause long-lasting inflammation, a well-known driver of cancer.
5. Dysregulation of the Immune System
Suppression of T cells and type I interferon weakens cancer surveillance and promotes immune evasion.
6. RNA Disruption
Codon optimization disrupts microRNA networks, destabilizing cell growth regulation and apoptosis.
7. Activation of Oncogenic Pathways
The spike protein indirectly activates MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling, fueling tumor growth and metastasis.
8. Tumor Microenvironment Alteration
Lipid nanoparticles accumulate in tumors, enhancing permeability and potentially accelerating cancer spread.
9. Awakening Dormant Cancers
Post-vaccination inflammation and immune disruption may trigger recurrence in patients previously in remission.
10. Alteration of Immune Surveillance
Modified mRNA blocks toll-like receptors, making tumor cells “invisible” to the immune system.
11. Frameshift Errors
The synthetic mRNA sometimes produces unintended, aberrant proteins, contributing to oncogenic risk.
12. Multiple Injections
Repeated doses exhaust the immune system and drive class switching to IgG4, promoting tolerance to tumors.
13. DNA Contamination
Residual plasmid DNA found in vaccine vials is replication-competent and could integrate into host genomes.
14. Oncogenic SV40 DNA Sequences
SV40 promoter sequences in Pfizer vials may facilitate genome insertion—this same element is used to induce tumors in lab animals.
15. Deregulation of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS)
Spike-induced AT1R activation fosters oxidative stress and uncontrolled cell proliferation.
16. Destruction of the Microbiota
The injections deplete bifidobacteria, weakening immune balance and impairing anti-cancer responses.
17. Increased Resistance to Treatments
Spike exposure prolongs cancer cell survival during chemotherapy, possibly driving treatment resistance.
These data help explain the 110,750 excess cancer deaths recorded in the U.S. since the launch of the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign. Analysis of official CDC datasets reveals that excess cancer mortality has not only persisted—but continues to accelerate in 2025:
Continuing to ignore this catastrophe will make it impossible to truly Make America Healthy Again.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
New Study Reveals Israeli Health Ministry’s COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Claims for Pregnant Women Were Misleading BY MORDECHAI SONES
Findings directly undermine Health Ministry campaign, which promoted vaccine as universally safe and explicitly denied any link to miscarriages
JUNE 23, 2025 Jewish Home
A new pre-print study has cast serious doubt on the Israeli Health Ministry’s 2021 assurances that COVID-19 vaccines were safe for pregnant women, revealing a troubling gap between the Ministry’s claims and the evidence that has since emerged.
Contents
Health Ministry’s 2021 Claims: Bold Assertions, Thin Evidence
New Evidence Exposes Early Pregnancy Risks
A Deliberate Strategy to Prioritize Uptake Over Accuracy
Eroding Trust and Raising Questions
Analyzing data from over 200,000 pregnancies in Israel, the study found that women vaccinated between weeks 8 and 13 of pregnancy—early in the first trimester—experienced a higher-than-expected rate of fetal losses: an additional 3.9 per 100 women for the first dose and 1.9 per 100 for the third dose.
These findings directly undermine the Ministry’s campaign, which promoted the vaccine as universally safe and explicitly denied any link to miscarriages, suggesting instead that the messaging was a deliberate strategy to drive vaccination rates rather than a reflection of the full evidence.
Health Ministry’s 2021 Claims: Bold Assertions, Thin Evidence
In January and February 2021, as Israel positioned itself as a global leader in COVID-19 vaccination, the Health Ministry launched an aggressive campaign targeting pregnant women. With slogans like “Come get vaccinated! For the future of your children,” the Ministry rolled out a series of definitive statements:
- Blanket Safety: “The Ministry of Health recommends the COVID vaccine for pregnant women. The recommendation is based on extensive data accumulated in Israel and worldwide, indicating the safety and efficacy of the vaccine for both the mother and the fetus.”
- No Miscarriage Risk: “The vaccine does not cause miscarriages or stillbirths. The accumulated data shows that the miscarriage rate in vaccinated women is similar to the miscarriage rate in the general population.”
- Anytime Vaccination: “Vaccination is recommended in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. It can be vaccinated at any time convenient for the pregnant woman, as part of routine pregnancy check-ups.”
These claims were presented as unassailable truths, with no hint of uncertainty or trimester-specific risks. The Ministry’s messaging implied a comprehensive understanding of the vaccine’s safety profile across all stages of pregnancy. Yet, the 2025 study reveals that this confidence was misplaced—or perhaps strategically overstated—particularly for the vulnerable early weeks of gestation.
New Evidence Exposes Early Pregnancy Risks
The 2025 study, currently in pre-print and pending peer review, offers a stark counterpoint to the Ministry’s assurances. Drawing on Israel’s robust health data systems, it highlights specific risks tied to the timing of vaccination:
- Elevated Fetal Loss: Women vaccinated between weeks 8 and 13 faced a heightened risk of fetal loss, a period when the fetus is especially susceptible to external factors.
- Dose-Specific Impact: The risk was most pronounced for first and third doses, with 3.9 additional fetal losses per 100 women for the former and 1.9 for the latter during this window.
- Data-Driven Insight: The study’s reliance on Israel’s extensive vaccination records lends weight to its findings, given the country’s high vaccination rates and detailed tracking.
These results expose a critical flaw in the Ministry’s blanket safety claims, suggesting that the “extensive data” touted in 2021 either failed to account for early pregnancy risks or was selectively interpreted to support a broader vaccination push.
A Deliberate Strategy to Prioritize Uptake Over Accuracy
The gap between the Health Ministry’s 2021 assertions and the 2025 study’s findings points to a calculated approach rather than an oversight. At the height of the pandemic, with Israel under pressure to vaccinate its entire population, the Ministry opted for a messaging strategy that prioritized vaccine uptake over nuanced transparency. By framing the vaccine as unequivocally safe across all trimesters—and dismissing miscarriage risks outright—the Ministry avoided the potential hesitancy that might have arisen from acknowledging data gaps or uncertainties, particularly for early pregnancy.
This approach becomes more apparent when considering the study’s focus on weeks 8 to 13, a stage when many women may not yet have confirmed their pregnancies or sought prenatal care. The Ministry’s failure to flag this period as potentially risky suggests a deliberate choice to streamline its message, even if it meant glossing over evidence that might have complicated the campaign. The 2025 study’s revelation of elevated fetal loss rates in this window underscores the consequences of that decision.
Eroding Trust and Raising Questions
The Health Ministry’s strategy has left a legacy of doubt. Pregnant women, who depended on the Ministry for reliable guidance, were given assurances that the new evidence now calls into question. The discrepancy suggests that the drive to vaccinate may have trumped the duty to provide a complete picture of the risks, particularly for those in early pregnancy. This raises broader concerns about the integrity of public health communication during the pandemic: When does the push for compliance override the need for accuracy?
Israel’s role as a vaccination pioneer makes these findings especially significant. The country’s data-rich environment should have enabled a more precise assessment of risks by trimester, yet the Ministry’s messaging remained broad and unwavering. Whether this reflects a lack of scrutiny or a conscious effort to downplay potential issues, the outcome is the same: Pregnant women were not fully informed.
A Reckoning for Public Health
The 2025 study lays bare the shortcomings of the Health Ministry’s 2021 claims, revealing a disconnect between the assurances offered and the reality that later emerged. The evidence of increased fetal loss among women vaccinated in early pregnancy challenges the Ministry’s portrayal of the vaccine as uniformly safe—a portrayal that appears to have been shaped by a deliberate strategy to boost uptake rather than a commitment to full disclosure.
As research continues, the lesson is clear: The Ministry’s failure to adapt its guidance in real time—or to acknowledge the limits of its data—has left a gap that this study begins to fill. Pregnant women should weigh the evolving evidence carefully. The stakes are too high for anything less.
[Ed.:
Public Reports Widespread mRNA Carnage, Mass Injury and Death in New X Polls By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
81% say they or a loved one suffered serious injury, disability, or death from mRNA shots — 79% believe the shots caused over 1 million deaths.
JUN 23, 2025 – Within the past week, I conducted two independent polls on X (formerly Twitter) to assess public perception of the COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign. The results are deeply worrisome:
81.3% Say They or a Loved One Were Seriously Injured by the Shot
In a poll conducted on my X account (@NicHulscher), 81.3% of 1,229 respondents answered “Yes” to the question:
“Have you or a loved one suffered serious injury, disability, or death after receiving a COVID-19 mRNA shot?”
Only 18.7% answered “No.”
79% Believe mRNA Shots Caused Over 1 Million Deaths
A second X poll hosted by the McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) asked:
“How many deaths do you think occurred as a direct result of mass COVID-19 mRNA injection programs?”
Of the 1,279 voters:
- 79% said “Over 1 million”
- 18% said “100,000 to 1 million”
- Just 3% believed deaths were fewer than 100,000
This implies that 97% of respondents believe that the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection program has caused at least 100,000 deaths—with the overwhelming majority estimating the toll in the millions.
While these are social media polls and not randomized scientific surveys, the results cannot simply be dismissed.
Our governments, public health agencies, and pharmaceutical companies must reckon with a growing wave of Americans who are no longer silent about what they’ve experienced or witnessed.
Trump, RFK, and Makary share accountability for COVID-19 vaccines left on market:
Trump, RFK, Makary Share Accountability for COVID-19 Vaccines Left on Market PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH Read full story
This is a national crisis. Americans deserve acknowledgment, restitution, and justice for their suffering.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
www.mcculloughfnd.org
mRNA ‘Vaccines’ to Be Banned in America, White House Insiders Reveal [VIDEO 55:37] Frank Bergman
June 21, 2025 slaynews.com
In an explosive revelation shaking up both the medical establishment and Washington, world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra has revealed that President Donald Trump’s administration is planning to ban Covid mRNA “vaccines” across America.
Dr. Malhotra, a top health advisor in the Trump administration, says the controversial mRNA injection could soon be pulled from the U.S. market entirely.
In a new interview with Dr. John Campbell, Malhotra noted that the information is not coming from fringe speculation, but from sources inside the White House.
“There’s no reason why this COVID-19 vaccine should not be completely pulled from the market,” Malhotra said.
“It’s just a question of time.”
The bold declaration came during a candid interview with Dr. Campbell, where Malhotra hinted that behind closed doors, top officials are scrambling to distance themselves from what many now view as one of the greatest medical catastrophes in modern history.
Malhotra, a former UK National Health Service (NHS) insider who was once pro-vaccine, has become one of the most credible and outspoken critics of the mRNA rollout.
He is now serving as Chief Medical Advisor to Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s MAHA Committee, a new vaccine safety body.
Malhotra says the writing is on the wall.
“They’re doing their due diligence.
“But when you look at the real data—the excess deaths, the cardiac events—this product has no business being on the market.”
Malhotra acknowledged that President Trump may still need convincing, however.
Yet, he’s optimistic that the tide is turning, especially with RFK Jr. now in charge of health oversight.
“I think there’s still a little bit of a barrier to overcome with Trump.
“But with Bobby on this committee, and everything else going on—it’s just a matter of time.”
WATCH [0:36] mRNA ‘Vaccines’ to Be Banned in America, White House Insiders Reveal
The interview coincides with the release of Malhotra’s new film, “Pharmageddon,” which debuted at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival.
The hard-hitting exposé follows up on his 2023 breakthrough “First Do No Pharm.”
It takes direct aim at corruption inside the FDA, CDC, and global health organizations.
“Medical knowledge is under commercial control,” Malhotra warned.
“And the benefits of most drugs are grossly exaggerated.”
The film features testimony from leading voices, including Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Fiona Godlee, Dr. Vandana Shiva, and RFK Jr. himself.
It focuses on how pharmaceutical giants manipulate science, buy out regulators, and use health crises to consolidate profit and power.
A press release for the film states:
“Pharmageddon is our fight to reclaim truth and prioritize patient health over profits.”
Malhotra’s statement, if true, marks a dramatic shift in the Covid narrative from “safe and effective” to “deadly and discredited.”
It also aligns with the growing body of evidence pointing to widespread harms from the shots.
As vaccine injuries, myocarditis cases, and sudden deaths mount, many Americans are demanding answers and accountability.
“Millions of Americans were forced, coerced, or lied to,” said one commenter.
“We don’t want apologies. We want prosecutions.”
FULL INTERVIEW [55:37]
With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the helm of HHS, and Malhotra advising from the inside, the days of Big Pharma’s unchecked power may finally be coming to an end.
But as Malhotra warns, don’t expect the establishment to go quietly.
READ MORE – Deadly Heart Condition Surges 115,100% in Covid mRNA-Vaccinated
