COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal recourse is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org
How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
BREAKING: Chemotherapy Reactivates Dormant Cancer Cells — Triggers Metastasis By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
New landmark study reveals that standard cancer treatment can backfire — with devastating consequences.
July 23, 2025
Chemotherapy is supposed to kill cancer — not bring it back. But a groundbreaking Cancer Cell study by He et al has revealed that common cancer drugs like doxorubicin and cisplatin can reawaken dormant tumor cells, triggering deadly metastatic relapses — especially in the lungs.
These “sleeping” cancer cells, known as disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), can lie hidden for years before reactivating. This study is the first to directly prove that chemotherapy itself can wake them up.
METHODS
Researchers used mice with breast cancer to model how chemotherapy affects dormant cancer cells. They developed a genetic tracing tool called DormTracer, which labels cells that go into dormancy and reveals if they later start dividing again.
Key steps:
- Mice received chemo (doxorubicin or cisplatin), then dormant tumor cells were tracked over time
- Advanced imaging and genetic markers distinguished cells that stayed dormant vs. those that “woke up”
- Some mice received senolytic drugs (to eliminate damaged stromal cells) or NET inhibitors (to block immune system traps)
They also examined breast cancer patients’ tumor tissue and blood before and after chemo — checking for inflammation, immune activity, and relapse signals.
KEY FINDINGS
- Chemotherapy Reactivates Dormant Cancer Cells
- Using DormTracer, the team showed that chemo-treated mice had a surge of previously dormant cancer cells re-entering the cell cycle.
- These reawakened cells formed aggressive lung metastases weeks after chemo — even in cases where the primary tumor was gone.
- This effect was specific to dormant cells; chemo suppressed active tumors but inadvertently activated the sleeping ones.
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Are the Trigger
-
- Chemotherapy didn’t just hit cancer cells — it also caused fibroblasts in the lung to enter a state called senescence (biological aging).
- These senescent cells released pro-inflammatory signals that activated neutrophils — a type of white blood cell.
- The neutrophils formed NETs — sticky webs of DNA and enzymes like MMP9 and neutrophil elastase — which remodeled the lung microenvironment and directly triggered dormant DTCs to awaken.
- SASP Proteins (C3, MIF, CXCL1) Drive This Chain Reaction
-
- The senescent fibroblasts released a toxic cocktail known as SASP (senescence-associated secretory phenotype).
- Three key factors — Complement C3, Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF), and CXCL1 — were identified as major drivers of NET formation.
- Mice engineered to lack C3 had far less NET activity and lower rates of metastasis after chemo.
- Blocking NETs or Clearing Senescent Cells Prevents Relapse
-
- Administering DNase I (which breaks up NETs) or GSK484 (a PAD4 inhibitor that blocks NET formation) completely prevented chemo-triggered metastasis in mice.
- Giving Dasatinib + Quercetin (a senolytic combo) cleared out the senescent fibroblasts and shut down the entire cascade — resulting in both primary tumor control and no relapse.
- Importantly, this combination didn’t reduce chemo’s effectiveness at shrinking the primary tumor.
- The Mechanism Was Confirmed in Humans
-
- In breast cancer patients, lung metastases had higher NET density and elevated C3, MIF, and CXCL1 levels after chemotherapy.
- Blood samples showed C3 and MIF spiked after treatment — especially in patients who later developed lung relapse.
- These markers could become predictive biomarkers for relapse risk in future screening.
This study flips the script on conventional cancer therapy. Chemotherapy may control the primary tumor — but it can also fuel future metastasis by waking up hidden cancer cells through inflammation and immune activation. Pairing chemo with senolytics or NET-blockers could dramatically reduce relapse — and early trials are already underway.
However, it’s time to explore cancer treatments that don’t harm the entire body and reawaken dormant cancer cells, such as:
[Ed. All I do is sit here and wait for what Nick says next! Seriously.]
[Ed.: Cultivate nosocomephobia!!]
Canada’s “Final Solution”: 15 Million Lives Targeted for State-Sanctioned Murder By Bobby Schindler
The 4th Reich Isn’t Coming—It’s Already Wearing a White Coat in Canada
July 21, 2025 – In a recent video, Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian combat veteran, host of The Kelsi Sheren Perspective, and an outspoken opponent of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) policies, shared how Canada’s government-controlled healthcare system plans to euthanize an estimated 15 million Canadians between 2027 and 2047, a staggering figure justified under the pretext of cost savings.
While doctor-assisted suicide in the U.S. has not yet reached the alarming extremes observed in Canada, the “death with dignity” movement is actively attempting to change that. Pending Governor Hochul’s signature on New York’s recently passed bill, 11 states and Washington, D.C., will permit this abhorrent and immoral practice.
Fortunately, dedicated coalitions – including the disability rights community, pro-life organizations, leaders within the Catholic Church, and other advocates – have helped slow its expansion.
Since Oregon first legalized assisted suicide in 1997, nearly 10,000 deaths have occurred under such laws. Nevertheless, with a culture increasingly embracing death as a solution, it’s difficult to predict whether the U.S. will ultimately follow Canada’s troubling example by normalizing assisted death instead of prioritizing compassionate care.
What often goes unnoticed, however, is that existing U.S. healthcare policies are already enabling the quiet killing of vulnerable Americans – not through legalized suicide, but through hospital protocols and policies that deny care, withdraw treatment, or subtly hasten death.
Though it’s impossible to know the precise numbers, with nearly 25,000 hospitals, nursing homes, and hospices operating across the U.S., it’s clear that far more patients have become victims of a healthcare system driven by institutional directives prioritizing cost-efficiency over humane, patient-centered care.
Even more alarming is that this growing disregard for human life isn’t occurring in a vacuum; it reflects a deeper cultural shift toward a utilitarian worldview, in which the inalienable worth of every individual, regardless of age, disability, or prognosis, is increasingly ignored. Instead of viewing vulnerable individuals as persons worthy of protection, too many policymakers and healthcare authorities now view them as “costs” to be managed and burdens to be removed.
When policymakers and medical groups begin framing suffering as something best eliminated through death rather than alleviated through patient-centered care, the outcome is a gradual, systemic abandonment of vulnerable populations, especially those unable to advocate for themselves.
For decades, U.S. healthcare policies, which have been shaped by hospital administrators, lawmakers, and medical ethicists, have quietly undermined life-affirming treatments. Decisions increasingly fall into the hands of bureaucrats and healthcare systems steered by financial considerations, rather than being made by patients, their families, or surrogates.
These include medical futility policies, non-consensual imposition of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, terminal sedation intended to hasten death, use of brain death or persistent vegetative state (PVS) diagnoses to justify withdrawal of care, pro-death advance directives, and the denial of due process for families seeking to dispute medical decisions, to name a few.
Perhaps most concerning, basic care – nutrition and hydration provided via feeding tubes – has been reclassified as “medical treatment.” Since the 1980s, this shift has allowed doctors to remove feeding tubes even from patients who are neither terminal nor actively dying and who can otherwise process food and hydration. This single policy change has endangered countless medically vulnerable people.
My family established the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network in response not only to my sister Terri’s death but also to the growing pattern of systemic failures that threaten the medically weak. Our mission is to uphold human dignity, especially for individuals facing life-threatening decisions in hospitals and care facilities.
Through our 24/7 National Crisis Lifeline, we provide urgent legal and medical referrals, along with ethical guidance, whenever the U.S. healthcare system attempts to impose any of these well-established anti-life policies on a patient or their loved ones.
The Life & Hope Network also educates the public, promotes life-affirming healthcare policies, and strives to restore a culture that respects the God-given, intrinsic value of every human being, especially those with cognitive disabilities, serious medical conditions, as well as the elderly.
There is simply no other advocate like the Life & Hope Network, and no comparable national resource exists like our 24/7 Crisis Lifeline, dedicated to assisting patients and families when they need it most.
The sobering reality is this: an increasing number of our medically fragile are being abandoned, and no one is coming to their rescue – not lawmakers, not the federal agencies overseeing our healthcare system, and not the medical establishment.
It falls upon families willing to advocate for their loved ones and upon committed organizations like the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network. Without this defense, the culture of death will inevitably spread unchecked, with the weakest among us paying the ultimate price.
LifeNews Note: Bobby Schindler and his family work as patient advocates, establishing the non-profit Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network in honor of his sister, Terri. Click here to learn more about the Life & Hope Network.
July 21, 2025 Brownstone Institute
If you had the decision to make tomorrow, would you vaccinate your newborn? The American Medical Association asked people in April of 2024 and found that 2 in 5 were unwilling to comply with the existing schedule. Keep in mind that this was before Trump was elected, before Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., became Secretary of HHS, and before Senator Ron Johnson held many hearings on Capitol Hill about vaccine injury.
What an irony. They created a shot to save the world and ended up discrediting the whole of the medical elites in the process. The big picture is that the Covid shot wrecked public confidence in one of the world’s most powerful industries.
In addition, that era undermined every institution that championed the attacks on human liberty, from media to tech to government to all the controlling heights of society. We are still seeing the fallout.
The loss of trust is clearly a turning point. Nearly all news can be read through this prism, whether it’s the Epstein mess, the Russia hoax, the ongoing upheavals coming from the Supreme Court, new doubts about weather modification, and so much more. Indeed, most of modern history is being reexamined in light of what we’ve been through.
Where Does the CDC’s Pervasive Dishonesty Come From? A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
A Window Is Finally Emerging to Reverse this Unstoppable Tide of Corruption
JUL 20, 2025
One of my major questions throughout life has been whether the bad things that happen around us are a result of a secretive group of bad actors (e.g., an organized conspiracy) or are simply a naturally emergent phenomenon that would occur regardless of which group was in power behind the scenes. The reason this is fundamentally a difficult question to answer is that in most cases, a compelling argument can be made for each, so ultimately, the interpretation you choose comes down to your own biases. In my own case, I still am not sure which is at play.
For instance, I frequently see policies be enacted in a coordinated fashion that lead to a clear outcome, and then watch as the years play out, that every institution works in unison to ensure that outcome comes to pass, and as such, when I see the opening moves, I tend to assume the ultimate outcome will follow (which, for example, is why I knew there would be vaccine mandates at the start of 2021).
Note: as it’s a bit of a tangent, I included a recent fairly impactful example of one of these coordinated campaigns at the end of the article.
Conversely, I often ask people directly connected to the government who is actually making the decisions that affect all of us, and one of the most informed people I know simply shared:
You can always point a finger at a specific agency or person, but the reality is that as the government gets bigger and bigger, more and more fiefdoms will emerge within it, and those groups will fight for their own interests at the expense of everyone else.
Note: many Federal agencies depend on obtaining congressional funding and, therefore, will engage in stunts to ensure that funding is allocated to them. For example, the CDC will routinely hype up inconsequential “pandemics” each year, as this nationwide drama allows them to obtain more funding.
The CDC’s Longstanding Corruption
Everyone has specific government agencies they dislike. One of mine has been the CDC because the CDC always promotes and protects vaccines (regardless of how egregious the vaccine is), criticizes integrative medical therapies, and promotes disease management strategies that are not very effective (e.g., masking for COVID).
It hence should not come as a surprise that the CDC has a longstanding history of corruption, did a variety of unscrupulous things to promote the COVID vaccines and in the present moment, has been the most resistant agency to the MAHA policies RFK Jr. has been working to enact (which in addition to being shown through news reports has been shared with me by people directly connected to the H.H.S.).
The CDC has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. Financial dealings with bio-pharmaceutical companies threaten that reputation.—Marcia Angell MD, former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine
In turn, if you browse their website, you will frequently encounter this CME disclaimer:
“CDC, our planners, content experts, and their spouses/partners wish to disclose they have no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services, or commercial supporters. Planners have reviewed content to ensure there is no bias. CDC does not accept commercial support.”
One of the primary ways the CDC legally takes bribes is due to a 1983 law where Congress authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its functions.” Following this, in 1992, Congress established The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, allowing the CDC to obtain additional funding for its work. Two years later, it was incorporated to “mobilize philanthropic and private-sector resources.”
Note: other Federal agencies, including the CIA and the NIH, have similar foundations (that are not subject to legal oversight such as Freedom of Information Act requests with many foundation directors later getting lucrative pharmaceutical employment).
Not surprisingly, the CDC Foundation has been accused of egregious conduct since its inception and has received nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate “donors” (criticisms include a scathing editorial in one of the world’s top medical journals). Some of the best examples of this corruption are documented in a 2019 letter to the CDC from a group of non-profit watchdog organizations. To quote part of it:
In 2011, Type Investigations reported that Exponent Inc, a firm that performs research for the pesticide industry, gave $60,000 to the CDC Foundation for a study to prove the safety of two pesticides. “We have a professional money-laundering facility at the Centers for Disease Control Foundation….They accept projects from anyone on the outside,” said James O’Callaghan, a researcher at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
Between 2010 and 2015, Coca-Cola contributed more than $1 million to the CDC Foundation. It also received significant benefits from the CDC, including collaborative meetings and advice from a top CDC staffer on how to lobby the World Health Organization to curtail its efforts to reduce consumption of added sugars.
The BMJ also reported on contributions from Roche to the CDC Foundation in support of the CDC’s Take 3 flu campaign, which encourages people to “take antiviral medicine if a doctor prescribes it.” Roche manufactures Tamiflu, an antiviral medication for the flu [for reference, Roche was able to convince governments around the world to stockpile hundreds of millions of dollars of Tamiflu while refusing to release any of their clinical data—and it was eventually concluded that the benefits of the drug are negligible, while significant harms result from the medication].
These “donations” in turn often shape the “impartial” guidelines we are expected to follow:
These mRNA vaccines are going to change mankind. They are changing you – your psyche, your brain.” Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi with Dr. Peter Breggin DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
“You are losing your individuality and personality.” Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi-=-April 2022
JUL 20, 2025
I found a forgotten gem of an interview Dr. Peter Breggin did with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in April, 2022! Our guest, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is with Doctors for COVID Ethics (D4CE). Here are these two brave physicians warning the world in the earliest days of the COVID vaccine about its toxic and deadly effects.
Listen here to this priceless conversation. And continue reading, below.
Why the US govt really stopped the case against Dr. Kirk Moore–an extraordinary interview with Sasha Latypova DR. PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN
The reason is not what you think…
JUL 18, 2025
Dr. Kirk Moore is a hero of the COVID wars. He administered saline shots instead of COVID vaccines to his patients and issued vaccine cards to them, allowing them to continue with their work or school. In doing so, Dr. Moore preserved the health of his patients and fulfilled his Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. He was subsequently charged by the Biden administration in 2023 with violating laws that resulted in “sabotaging” the rollout of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Appeals to the new Trump administration to pardon the doctor or dismiss the case were ignored, and the trial moved forward.
Jury selection was done, and the discovery phase had begun. The trial had gone on for one week. Officials were being interrogated on the witness stand. Colleagues, patients, friends, and patriots filled the courtroom, and a growing awareness of this ongoing travesty of justice was evident through social media.
Breggin Alerts! Exposing Global Predators is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Then, in the eleventh hour, the charges were suddenly dropped. US Attorney General Pam Bondi said, “Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today.” She undoubtedly acted with the approval, if not the insistence, of President Trump. And it really was over, because there was a provision that the government could not bring it again.
At first, it seemed like a miracle. Everyone we know was delighted for Dr. Moore and his loved ones, and so were we.
However, a compromise agreement was forced on Dr. Moore as part of the government’s decision to drop the case: Dr. Moore would NOT be allowed to sue the government for costs.
In addition to the caveat, the whole thing began to look suspicious. There was no ripple effect. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s Health and Human Services was still endorsing the vaccine for large populations of patients. Anyone over 65 years of age was supposed to receive it, as was anyone else who had pre-existing conditions, including pregnant and nursing mothers, and babies 6 months of age and older.
This meant that there were literally hundreds of thousands of patients who ran the risk of being murdered or disabled by lifelong conditions due to the ongoing distribution of the vaccines. A significant number of patients, especially among the elderly, the ill, and pregnant women and their children, would die before their natural time, from heart disease, from a damaged immune system, from miscarriage or stillbirth, to hundreds of other identified adverse effects of the jab.
Was there an increasing awareness in the administration about the damage done by the mRNA vaccines? Was this ending of the trial an acknowledgement of the heroism this physician demonstrated in protecting his patients from the potentially deadly effects of the COVID-19 vaccine? Were we going to see mRNA vaccines suspended and banned? Damaged patients recognized and helped? Charges brought against those responsible for creating and pushing the toxic, deadly mRNA bioweapons upon a gaslit public?
“Trump and Bondi are stopping discovery!”
All of this was puzzling us, until Ginger Breggin realized in a flash, “Trump and Bondi are stopping discovery. They don’t want the public hearing revelations about the COVID-19 and deadly jabs.”
But we remained puzzled about the timing. Why wait so long into the trial before ending it? Was it just to stretch out the punishment of the good doctor and those who care about him, as well as those who want to see a full investigation and rejection of the COVID-19 attack on humanity?
And there was that caveat to the ending of the trial, a compromise demanded by the government — that Dr. Moore agree not to sue.
Enter Sasha Latypova
Our radio interview with Sasha Latypova, released on podcast on July 18, 2025, has helped clarify our understanding of the government’s conduct.
Latypova is a very successful retired pharmaceutical consultant who has become a reformer, initially in response to the travesties of COVID-19. She is now among the very top of vaccine and pharmaceutical experts in the entire health freedom and freedom movement. She, along with another great freedom fighter, Katherine Watt, had helped Dr. Moore’s legal team develop his defense.
In our interview with Latypova, she reports that the judge had initially ruled against Dr. Moore presenting critical information in his defense about the deadliness of the vaccines. The government allowed the trial to begin and continue because it had no fear of COVID-19 disclosures coming to light. Nothing would come up to discredit Trump’s beloved Operation Warp Speed and to bring the global conspiracy crashing down. But the government made a mistake by bringing up one of the suppressed subjects. So the judge now lifted the secrecy of specific materials about the murderous effects of the vaccines that Dr. Moore was refusing to give to his patients. Kirk Moore’s team was about to blow open the whole Covid Murderous Scam.
A Comment by Dr. Breggin
In my legal work as a medical expert, I have testified in cases where judges have ruled out my bringing up information that would harm the other side’s case, and sometimes I have been able to legally get past the prohibition. In a case against St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, DC, an older man was petitioning for release after decades of horrendous, involuntary incarceration. At the start of the trial, the judge ruled that I could not testify about my findings in the hospital records that the man had been repeatedly sexually abused since he was hospitalized as a teenager, causing his condition to vastly deteriorate over many years of being abused while locked up.
After my direct testimony, in which I was not allowed to discuss the most important issue in the case, the repeated sexual abuse of my client, I now had to face cross-examination by an attorney representing the hospital. During the cross-examination, the increasingly hostile lawyer for the hospital asked me in a sneering fashion, thinking he would trap me in front of the jury, “If the patient is not schizophrenic as every hospital doctor has diagnosed him for decades, what’s your diagnosis?”
I responded, “Chronic Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Due to Repeated Sexual Abuse in the Hospital.” Of course, the lawyer protested that I had broken the rules, but the judge replied, “You asked him the question, counselor, and he gave an appropriate answer.” The judge ruled that the answer would be allowed, and then I was able to amplify it with the hospital records during re-cross by the victim’s attorney.
Probably because this incriminating material of severe injustice was brought to light, the jury gave the remarkable and unexpected opinion that the man was not mentally ill and that the hospital must find a better, safer placement for him.
From Dr. Peter Breggin’s resume:
1991: In Washington, D.C. in Richey v. St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, an elderly man involuntarily hospitalized since his teenage years and now suffering from post-traumatic dementia brought an action to be released from St. Elizabeths Hospital in DC on the grounds that he was not mentally ill. He chose a jury trial. Dr. Breggin testified that the young man had not been severely disturbed when admitted for problems with truancy but was raped in the hospital, an event leading to a lifetime of incarceration in the institution. Dr. Breggin documented incidents of physical and sexual abuse in the hospital throughout the inmate’s lifetime hospital stay from his teenage to his elder years. Dr. Breggin also testified on the impact of multiple medications, electroshock, repeated sexual abuse, and chronic institutionalization on the man as a teenager, adult, and elder. The jury found for the patient, declaring that he was not mentally ill, and by implication, that he was a victim of chronic, continuing abuse. The judge ordered the hospital to facilitate his release to a less restrictive environment.
We believe the Trump administration stopped the case against Dr. Kirk Moore precisely in order to prevent shocking discoveries which would have finally shed public light on Covid jab deaths and destruction, and the massive global coverup. And that is also why they had to stop Dr. Moore from bringing another embarrassing case, asking to be refunded his enormous costs from the legal fees and his loss of income.
The only explanation that makes sense is that the charges against Dr. Kirk Moore were dropped to avoid discovery under oath in a court of law of officials who had participated in the greatest product liability negligence and fraud cases in the history of medicine — virtual mass murder.
We, the American people, are witnesses to the Trump regime becoming coconspirators in the ongoing program to destroy freedom and human life under the fraudulent banner of public health responses to pandemics. The global predators behind all this are clearly planning to do this to us again and again as a major bioweapon against humanity and human freedom.
In this amazing interview with Sasha Latypova, she describes another case in which she is involved, in this other case not only as a consultant but as a potential expert witness. The new case is Dutch, and it’s against Bill Gates and other “vaccine” masterminds for genocide!
Latypova describes chilling factors surrounding the case in Europe that will confirm her incredible courage and honesty in participating, while it re-emphasizes that the governing powers across the Western World are intent on protecting COVID-19 as a model for keeping us in line, while depopulating us and weakening our resistance to them.
A Final Comment by Ginger Breggin
Prior to Dr. Moore’s trial, we had already watched with dismay as the FDA, under Secretary Kennedy’s leadership, approved a new Moderna vaccine. Truth be told, I should have seen it then. A lifetime ago, in my own childhood, an epidemic of birth defects that were both shocking and profound emerged. Newborn infants, with severely foreshortened arms or legs, sometimes missing altogether, or with other damage to eyes, ears, genitals, or internal organs, faced a lifetime of challenges. Some babies were so badly deformed that they could not survive, dying shortly after birth. The causative drug, thalidomide, was pulled from the global market. It took the individual courage and tenacity of Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey, a physician and reviewer in the FDA, to ensure the drug was never approved for use in the United States, and thus only 17 cases emerged domestically.
This time, despite the disastrous and continuing rise in deaths and injuries from the mRNA vaccines, there is only denial. Surviving victims of the rollout of the COVID jab have been ignored and pushed aside, unacknowledged by the very agencies tasked with guarding the health of Americans. Instead of preventing an epidemic (which was never the threat we were told it would be) the supposed ‘solution’ foisted upon us in a time of great fear has caused an epidemic of sudden deaths, turbo cancers, deadly white “clots” that were never before seen, heart attacks, heart failure, neurological disabilities, immune system failures, and untold suffering by patients and their families. And all of this is denied and covered up by our government.
The People of America Will Have to Push for an mRNA Ban
The push to abolish these toxic and deadly agents will have to come from the people of America. We are seeing in other arenas that the President of the United States does respond to his base and to his cabinet members. The push must come from the cabinet members involved, not downward from the President of the United States. Especially where the technology is as specialized as in medicine and public health, it is up to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his HHS officials and staff to inform and educate President Trump about the destruction and damage caused by mRNA vaccines and the mRNA platforms that are being massively pushed by the global predators. Trump’s advisors owe it to him and to humanity, and otherwise they become coconspirators to their own future genocide trials.
We must demand that the government acknowledge the COVID-19 jab deaths and widespread harms and stop all human experiments using mRNA genetic platforms. We must demand that the government acknowledge the wounded and help to ease the burdens of the adverse effects inflicted upon them. The “experiment” should be over. It is time to stop the obvious killing and mayhem. Indeed, the call for further studies on current mRNA vaccines, as RFK Jr. suggested, is a travesty in the face of the great experimentation that turned into a massacre.
We, the wounded, the doctors treating the wounded, the public citizens who have had their eyes opened through the dreadful witnessing of death or disability of loved ones and friends and neighbors — we have to carry the message. We must warn our fellow citizens and demand that the administration — whomever is in office — abandon this toxic, destructive, practice that masquerades as a “treatment.” Nobody is being treated. And millions have already died. For the sake of all Americans and humanity, abandon this madness.
First published on AmericaOutLoud.news July 16, 2025 and July 18, 2025
