COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?]
[Ed.: How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]
Why Was Moderna Allowed to Use A Toxic mRNA Dose? A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
The data that proves Moderna used a deadly dose and the psychopathy that led to the choice to use it
AUG 04, 2024
•One of the major problems facing mRNA technology was finding a dose that was strong enough to elicit the desired effect but simultaneously not unbearably toxic. Moderna in turn chose a dose that was 3.3X greater than what even Pfizer felt was safe enough to use.
•Since the vaccines hit the market, numerous datasets have shown the Moderna vaccine is roughly 50% more likely to injure recipients (which includes deaths, miscarriages, and birth defects). Despite this, no regulator has done a basic comparison on the safety of the vaccines.
•Steve Kirsch recently got access to a country-wide dataset on deaths following vaccination. It showed clearly and unambiguously that the Moderna vaccine caused 30% more deaths than Pfizer’s. Additionally, it also showed that Pfizer’s vaccine raised the risk of death by 34% and that both vaccines had minimal efficacy in preventing COVID-19 deaths.
•Moderna’s decision to bring a toxic mRNA dose to market reflected the corrosive culture at this startup, which swindled billions from investors over false promises of the miracles of mRNA and fired any employee who did not repeat the mantra, “mRNA gene therapies are safe and effective.” Likewise, Moderna’s approval and protection once on the market go hand in hand with the government’s heavy financial investment in Moderna. [Emphasis added]
One of the most common questions I received at the start of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout was if it was better to take Pfizer, Moderna or to wait for J&J’s to come out. Given all the potential risks of the mRNA technology (e.g., of it not breaking down, it potentially integrating into the genome, or it having a high theoretical risk for causing cancer, autoimmunity, and blood clots—all of which there was still no public data on), my typical advice was to wait for J&J’s likely safer one to come out as that would give them more information on the risks and benefits of each one and simultaneously to provide them with early treatment options for COVID-19 so they didn’t need to be as concerned about catching the infection.
Note: each of the sources I linked to above demonstrates why it was possible to know this risk existed prior to the vaccine rollout.
Based on their comparative designs and the reports I received, I suspected Moderna was the worst. For example, someone I knew who developed a common debilitating autoimmune condition after Moderna was told by their rheumatologist that they had seen the exact same thing happen in multiple patients after Moderna, while someone I know who had a sudden expected tendon rupture was likewise told the same thing by their orthopedic surgeon. Unfortunately, it wasn’t possible to come to a clear conclusion here as the majority of the people who shared their adverse reports with me (and I compiled here) knew it was Pfizer or Moderna but weren’t sure which, and since far more Pfizer vaccines were given in the United States that it became quite hard to know if proportionally I was receiving more reports of severe injuries from Moderna.
Public Health has brought us: by Jennifer Margulis, PhD
12:36 PM · Aug 4, 2024 Jessica Rojas
Toxic water in Flint, Michigan
An addiction crisis that results in 70,000 drug overdose deaths per year, nearly 70% from opioids
Some 600,000 unnecessary C-sections a year
One of the highest maternal mortality rates of any industrialized country
23 million Americans suffering from autoimmune conditions
1 in 36 children with ASD
Suicide rates rising, especially among young people and medical doctors , and a life expectancy rate that has fallen (slightly but enough to be considered statistically significant) for the past 3 years.
Public Health prioritizes profits over people, resulting in one of the most bloated vaccine schedules in the world.
I love America . We all want the same thing: our children and our planet to survive and thrive. It pains me to see so many parents suffering because their children have environmentally induced iatrogenic brain and immune system damage.
Public Health is failing the 327 million people who live in this country. Anyone who takes the time to look at the big picture understands that this is true.
Having concerns about the CDC’s current childhood vaccine recommendations isn’t about being anti-vaccine. It’s about being in favor of children’s health, evidence-based medicine, science, and intact brains.
Journalists, it’s time to report fairly and accurately on this topic.
Politicians, responding to the failure of Public Health by trying to force for-profit medicine on every family is absurd.
Doctors, enough already. Come out of the closet. We need you to fight for our children not for Big Pharma.”
‘Stunning’ 620% Higher Risk of Myocarditis After mRNA COVID Vaccines
‘Stunning’ 620% Higher Risk of Myocarditis After mRNA COVID Vaccines –A peer-reviewed study of 9.2 million South Koreans published in Nature Communications uncovered a 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% higher risk of pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Researchers also noted increased risks of several autoimmune conditions, especially after booster doses.
26 July 2024 – A large-scale peer-reviewed South Korean study has found significantly increased risks of serious cardiac and neurological conditions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and lesser risks of several autoimmune diseases. The nationwide population-based cohort study, published Tuesday in Nature Communications, followed nearly 4.5 million people for an average of 15 months after vaccination. Researchers found a striking 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% increased risk of pericarditis in people who received the vaccine compared to historical controls. The study also revealed a 62% increased risk for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare neurological disorder.
“Blood Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 Lipid Nanoparticle mRNA Vaccine in Humans” JESSICA ROSE
A summary of the newly uploaded preprint by Kent et al.
AUG 03, 2024 – A new preprint hit the presses on July 27, 2024 entitled: “Blood Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 Lipid Nanoparticle mRNA Vaccine in Humans”.1 It was written by a group out of Australia and describes experiments that they did to show that the lipid nanoparticles used in the Moderna COVID-19 injectable products stick around and circulate on the blood. Shocker. They describe how so-called ‘anti-vector responses’ – such as the production of anti-PEG antibodies in the case of the modified mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based injectable products – can be potent effectors in an immune response; be it beneficial, or not. As the authors point out, the long-term effects of boosting anti-PEG antibodies is not known.2
What they did
They wanted to compare the decay rates of both the LNPs and anti-PEG antibodies to see whether the latter influenced the former decay-kinetics-wise, and how, if so. They took 19 people who got the Moderna bivalent ‘booster’ shot by intra-muscular IM-injection, and measured the modified mRNA by PCR and an ionizable lipid (LNP proxy) by mass spectrometry from plasma-derived samples. This small cohort of people all got at least 3 doses of monovalent COVID shots previously. The also took samples from everyone prior to ‘boosting’, and everyone was at least 139 days out from their last shot. This was their control.
One half-decent piece of news is that of the samples tested prior to the ‘booster’ shot being administered, none showed signs of modified mRNA according to their assays: a reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method. The ddPCR step uses oil droplets to partition the reaction mixture, enabling the absolute quantification of target DNA without the need for standard curves and apparently is highly sensitive and accurate.3
Four hours after the ‘booster’ however, modified mRNA was detected in all samples and in half of the people stuck around for 28 days.
To examine the LNP kinetics, they used a mass spectrometry-based lipidomics method to detect and quantify SM-102 lipids. For those of you who are new to this SM-102 ionizable cationic lipid, I have written extensively on this and you can read about that here and here and here and here.
Meta-Analysis Finds Massive Failure of COVID-19 Vaccines to Stop SARS-CoV-2 PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
68 Studies Combined Demonstrates Lack of Theoretical Efficacy
AUG 03, 2024 – Virtually every vaccinated person I meet has contracted COVID-19. Many still believe vaccination was worth the risk because they did not end up in the hospital in 2021 through the present day. Vaccine-takers tended to be younger working age individuals who were mandated by work or school, and therefore healthier than those not forced into taking the jab. In my practice, the senior citizens who took the vaccine tended to be healthier and far more worried about COVID-19. They were the first to get early treatment for the illness. Finally, we all saw COVID-19 illness become far milder on the second, third, and fourth infections because of natural immunity as we were faced with milder strains. So in the midst of this confounded set of relationships, how did the COVID-19 vaccines perform?
Wu et al, published a meta-analysis of 68 studies evaluating efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination. Keep in mind only favorable studies were accepted by editors. The results indicate a stunning failure of vaccination. Because the data are not from high-quality, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials, and publication bias, we must be conservative and consider the lower-bound of the confidence interval as the statistic of interest. This means that vaccine performance could be as bad as that number.
