Daily Shmutz | COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery | 9/15/24

COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.:  FEAR YOUR DOCTOR!  Medicine is a disgraced profession.  They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer! Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia.  Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?]

[Ed.:  How Bad is My Batch?  Enter your batch number(s) and find out.  Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!]

 

ACAM2000 Package Insert Warning: “Death of unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals.”   SUPER SPREADER

Do you still refuse to believe that they are TRYING to kill you?

SEP 14, 2024

Really important information to be aware of.

“On August 30th, 2024 the FDA approved the new ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine for use against monkey pox.

The warning label of this vaccine says:

“Individuals who are vaccinated with this vaccine should quarantine for 4 weeks after injection. During this quarantine individuals cannot handle babiesbe around pregnant womencannot go swimming or be in hot tubscannot use public restroomsshare a bedclothing, or be in close contact with an unvaccinated individual.

It also says on the warning label that this ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine “may cause the spread of smallpox”. But the worst part. . .at the bottom of this vaccine insert, it states- “Death of unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals may occur”.

Continue reading

 

Strategies for Ridding the Body of Synthetic mRNA and Spike Protein   PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Dr. McCullough on Brannon Howse Live

SEP 14, 2024 – With the world in regret over taking one or more COVID-19 vaccines, the race is on to find ways of allowing the body to rid itself of the long-lasting and toxic mRNA-lipid nanoparticle complex and its deadly product the Wuhan Spike Protein.

Please enjoy this September 6, 2024 appearance I had on Brannon Howse Live, Worldview Tube Television to discuss recent paper on new technologies to deactivate mRNA and review the global standard for degrading the Spike protein, namely, McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Hulscher N, McCullough PA, Marotta DE. Strategic deactivation of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: New applications for siRNA therapy and RIBOTACs. J Gene Med. 2024 Sep;26(9):e3733. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3733. PMID: 39183706.

Hulscher N, Procter BC, Wynn C, McCullough PA. Clinical Approach to Post-acute Sequelae After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination. Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49204. PMID: 38024037; PMCID: PMC10663976.

 

Just a Reminder: Masks Are BAD For Your Health   By Michael Bryant

September 6, 2024

Within an established totalitarian regime the purpose of propaganda is not to persuade, much less to inform, but rather to humiliate. From this point of view, propaganda should not approximate the truth as closely as possible: on the contrary, it should do as much violence to it as possible. For by endlessly asserting what is patently untrue, by making such untruth ubiquitous and unavoidable, and finally by insisting that everyone publicly acquiesce in it, the regime displays its power and reduces individuals to nullities.” — Theodore Dalrymple

A recent study in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal, took an in-depth look at the toxic hazards posed by wearing face masks during the 2020–2023 covid pandemic. Under the public health measures imposed by most government jurisdictions during those four years, “people around the world were forced to wear masks for large proportions of the day based on mandates and laws.”

The study, titled “Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins — A scoping review,” specifically looked at “the potential of face masks for the content and release of inanimate toxins.”

The scoping review focused on 24 separate studies that evaluated the content and/or release of toxins in 631 masks (273 surgical masks, 228 textile masks, and 130 N95 masks).

Sixty-three percent of the studies showed alarming results. They found high microplastics and nanoplastics release. Dangerous exceedances were also evidenced for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), xyleneacrolein, per-/polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and phthalates as well as for lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), antimony (Sb), and titanium dioxide (TiO2).

A chart that graphically illustrates the “toxic substances and classes that may be responsible for limit value exceedances with resulting potential life-shortening effects” can be found here:

The study’s authors emphasized that their sole focus was on “the direct human health risks resulting from direct absorption of possible toxins from the mask.” They acknowledged certain additional hazards that were not within the scope of this study:

  • The risks of the “animate ecosystem” (e.g., bacteria and fungi accumulation associated with mask-wearing);
  • The toxicological risks of inhaled CO2 from the mask dead space;
  • Toxins that were regarded separately, because their mixture and interaction can contribute to a higher toxicity than can each substance on its own;
  • Further risks of chemical reactions in the mask breathing zone, which are turned into “chemical reactors” at the entrance of the airways.

Note that this evaluation took into account only inanimate toxins. This means the overall harms from mask-wearing are likely even greater than cited here.

This most recent study brought the contentious topic of “face masks as a public health measure” back into the spotlight and reaffirmed our native intelligence—namely, that putting industrial material over our mouth and our nose when we breathe is not a good idea.

The unequivocal results of this study are not favorable for any public health official, politician, administrator, or bureaucrat who imposed mask mandates on employees, school children, and the public at large. Indeed, the study’s authors leave no wiggle room when they write:

“Undoubtedly, mask mandates during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been generating an additional source of potentially harmful exposition to toxins with health threatening and carcinogenic properties at population level with almost zero distance to the airways (predominantly oral inhalation route) and to the gastrointestinal tract.” [Emphasis added.]

“Moreover, from a toxicological point of view, concerning their potential risks of use, face mask obligations enforced by law 2020–2023 have been introduced without preceding comprehensive risk analyses and without regulatory provisions (as is common for various products). On top of that, there was and still is no empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the masks in limiting the spread of viruses in the general populace.” [Emphasis added.]

There are a number of other reasons besides health to be opposed to mandatory mask-wearing. Wearing face coverings has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects.

Historically, masks have been used to objectify human beings and have been used as symbols of ritual humiliation and submission.

Recently, for example, we witnessed how masks were used as tools of emotional blackmail when children were taught that wearing a mask displays evidence of their “social responsibility.” In fact, what they were really being taught was to obey unscientific appeals to authority.

The masking debate has never been about facts, data, science, or human kindness. Rather, mask mandates are meant to create a climate of fear and to induce people to voluntarily submit to coercion and to perceived power. Mandatory masks are nothing more than psychological training wheels for coercive measures — that is, politically motivated propaganda.

Covering a face, hiding a smile, and smothering laughter are denials of life.

Breath is life. A smile is life. Laughter is life.

Choose life.

 

When you murder your most loyal customers, they stop coming back…     SASHA LATYPOVA

Moderna cuts R&D budget by $1.1B, Charles River lays off 3% staff.

SEP 13, 2024 – According to Endpoint News, Moderna is in financial trouble. They are not even “break-even”, i.e. not generating positive cash flow from operations! This is after Trump’s Operation Warp Speed showered $10B+ on them in a span of about 18 months. Where did all this money go? Swiss vaults? Secret underground bases in Antarctica where Bancel is planning to hide out for the duration of Armageddon? I don’t know, I am not well versed in these conspiracies.

To kick off its annual R&D day in New York, Moderna said Thursday that it will slash its annual spending on research and development by $1.1 billion by 2027. The biotech will also stop developing five early-stage programs, place other drugs on the backburner and focus on a handful of late-stage mRNA medicines.

Simultaneously, Moderna overhauled its long-term financial projections, and it now forecasts the company’s break-even point in 2028 instead of 2026. The shake-up will not include major layoffs, Bancel told Endpoints News, and he envisions the company staying around its 6,000-employee headcount for the next three to five years.

But, you see, according to Bancel, this is because “it’s working!”, just like your beautiful mRNA shot is working as promised…

“It’s a moment of evolution, in the sense the platform is working, which is the most important thing,” Bancel said. “We just want to be responsible and financially disciplined.”

Moderna’s stock price $MRNA has fallen over 80% over the past three years, erasing about $150 billion in market value from its all-time, pandemic highs.

The Wall Street is not impressed:

“R&D reductions are too far out chronologically to be credible from a management team that we think has proven serially unable to project the performance of their business,” Leerink Partners analyst Mani Foroohar wrote in a Thursday morning note to investors. Foroohar holds an underperform rating on Moderna’s stock.

Jefferies analyst Michael Yee also said he expects the investor debate to continue over whether Moderna can reach profitability without raising additional money, noting that the R&D cuts are occurring “further out in time.”

Break-even forecast delayed two years.

The cuts will slash Moderna’s R&D spending by about 20% from 2025 to 2028, from a total of $20 billion to $16 billion.

The focus will be 10 product launches by the end of 2027, including vaccines for Covid, flu, RSV, norovirus, and cytomegalovirus, or CMV. I have personally reviewed the CMV vaccine data in animals when I reviewed Moderna’s animal testing data for mRNA covid shots. That’s because they simply put in CMV studies from 2017 into the covid shot package in 2020 and said it’s all the same! To some extend that’s true – it’s all the same poison, from the same source – DARPA/DTRA/CDC. The data from 2017 showed that the CMV vax distributes all over the body, accumulates in major organs where it causes death and injury. It is just as poisonous as anything else Moderna makes. This company is mostly a storefront for the US government/DOD pushing injectable poison under false pretenses of “public health”. Moderna doesn’t “develop” any new medicines, as they had fired anyone competent in drug development long before 2020. Their manufacturing is “fully digital” so that people on the floor can’t ask any questions.

The RSV vaccine is a flop, as people are becoming less stupid. That’s good news.

So far, Moderna has struggled to gain commercial traction with its RSV vaccine, called mResvia, in an intensely and newly competitive market with rival shots sold by GSK and Pfizer.

Other prioritized programs include two rare-disease therapies and a Merck-partnered cancer vaccine program.

Moderna is also stopping five early-stage programs (thank goodness):

mRNA-1287, an endemic human coronaviruses vaccine

mRNA-1345, its RSV vaccine in the infant population

mRNA-5671, a KRAS-targeting cancer vaccine

mRNA-2752, a cancer drug

mRNA-0184, a heart failure therapy

In addition, Charles River Laboratories is cutting around 3% of its total workforce in “response to current trends”. Charles River is the main provider of animal studies for the global pharma industry. Since they are the early stage R&D provider, this indicates overall shrinkage of the pharma industry pipelines.

The Wilmington, MA-based company is laying off staff as well as “streamlining” its cost structure to “optimize its footprint, be more effective in supporting clients, and drive greater operating efficiencies, ” the spokesperson added.

As of Dec. 31 2023, the company had around 21,800 employees globally, and a 3% cut could mean that around 650 staffers would be laid off.

The company noted that pharma clients are overall pulling back on their R&D spending, which has a negative impact on CDMOs and manufacturers. Many pharma companies are shrinking their pipelines to cut costs, a trend Charles River CEO James Foster predicts will continue into next year.

Couldn’t have happened to a better bunch of people…

 

“Dr. Robert Chandler Exposes Batch-Based Injuries”   [1:04:29]   DR NAOMI WOLF

SEP 13, 2024 – A lead physician of the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Team, Dr. Robert Chandler, explains a new peer-reviewed study of 5 million Scandinavians, that shows three different outcomes, generally, based upon batch received. Is the mRNA rollout a massive ongoing experiment? Did Pfizer knowingly create three different formulas? Also: to find out what may have happened to you.

[Ed.:  How Bad is My Batch?]

 

The Truth: About COVID-19 Shots   [VIDEO 22:45]   2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

Uncover the shocking truth behind COVID-19 vaccines: contamination, hidden risks, and regulatory failures. Millions were exposed without informed consent—this fight is for accountability & justice.

SEP 12, 2024 – This video delves into the alleged concealment of critical information regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA injections, focusing on how regulatory bodies and authorities misled the Australian public. It claims that significant contamination of genetic material was found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, far exceeding safety thresholds, with potential links to severe health risks like cancer and autoimmune diseases. Despite independent verification from multiple labs, global regulators, including Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), dismissed concerns, claiming there was no safety risk without conducting proper tests.

The video argues that the mRNA injections are in fact gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines, citing how these injections modify genetic material within cells to stimulate an immune response. It criticizes the lack of rigorous testing on the long-term effects of this genetic modification, accusing manufacturers and health authorities of withholding important information about the risks, such as the bio-distribution of modified RNA throughout the body and its potential to disrupt cellular functions.

Legal challenges against Pfizer and Moderna are outlined, notably the case of Dr. Julian Fidge, who accused the companies of bypassing Australia’s regulatory requirements for gene therapies. The lawsuit was dismissed due to a lack of legal standing, but the video highlights potential conflicts of interest, including Judge Helen Rofe’s undisclosed connections to Pfizer. This raises questions about the integrity of the judicial process, especially regarding the dismissal of critical evidence related to genetic contamination.

The video also condemns the narrative pushed by health authorities that the vaccines were “safe and effective,” arguing that data showed minimal absolute risk reduction and high infection rates among vaccinated individuals. It accuses authorities of fearmongering, particularly regarding children, and asserts that pregnant and breastfeeding women were given false assurances about the safety of the vaccines, despite being excluded from clinical trials.

Ultimately, the video calls for accountability and justice, emphasizing that millions of Australians were subjected to experimental gene-based treatments without adequate informed consent. It demands transparency, thorough investigations into regulatory failures, and reparations for those harmed. The script ends with a strong appeal to hold responsible parties accountable and to ensure that such breaches of public trust are never repeated.

They want you dead.

Do NOT comply.

See video in article

[Ed.:

 

How vaccines cause autism   STEVE KIRSCH

The science is clear. The aluminum in vaccines gets escorted into your brain. That’s the crux of it. The MMR shots don’t have aluminum, but MMR ends up being a great escort service.

SEP 12, 2024 – I was excited recently when I read a recent Substack post by my friend JB Handley entitled, “International scientists have found autism’s cause. What will Americans do?

I immediately thought, “Vindication! We can now get the truth out with this new discovery.” I read the article looking for the new discovery only to find that the latest big discovery was published in 2018.

So I called JB and asked him if I missed anything. “Nope,” he said. He said that he published the article during COVID and didn’t get any traction on it and decided just now to republish it. So that’s the backstory on this article.

The main cause of autism

In a nutshell, it’s the accumulation of aluminum in the brain. This can happen with vaccines containing aluminum (or presumably other metals), but it can also happen from other vaccines like the MMR and COVID vaccines (which don’t contain aluminum) which can escort aluminum deposited into your body from other vaccines into the right places to trigger autism.

Vaccine experts argue aluminum is perfectly safe because it is assumed to be safe. But there is no science to support this.

Continue reading

[Ed.:  This warning includes cooking with aluminum pots and pans, and aluminum foil!]

 

Recovering from Myopericarditis on McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification  [57:26]   PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Dr. McCullough with Jason Lavigne and Vaccine Injured Paramedic Chet Chisholm

SEP 12, 2024 – Please enjoy this full length program hosted by Jason Levine with vaccine injured paramedic Chet Chisholm who is slowly but steadily recovering from COVID-19 vaccine myopericarditis. Lavigne is doing more than just podcasting. He is running as an independent for federal parliament to represent Yellowhead, Alberta. We discuss corruption, malfeasance, Chisholm’s pursuit of justice, and most importantly Chet’s road to recovery aided by McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification.

We review our recent critical paper on risk stratification for risk of cardiac death after vaccination which is largely an assessment for subclinical myopericarditis. The major, foundational action step for the vaccinated is McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification. I mention that the starting doses listed below, if well tolerated after a few weeks, are commonly doubled and quadrupled, always to be taken on an empty stomach.

Continue reading

[Ed.:  Dr. McCullough and others strongly recommends nattokwinase as a part of the spike removal tools.  I would like to strongly recommend the addition of lumbrokinase to the protocol.  Lumbrokinase is similar to nattokwinase, but 30X stronger!]

 

COVID vax: Some batches increase your all-cause mortality by 9X or more.   STEVE KIRSCH

But hey, nobody who works in public health actually cares how many people are killed by the lack of quality control on these vaccines. They are “safe and effective” even when they aren’t.

SEP 11, 2024

Executive summary

Batch analysis of the Czech Republic data comparing 1-year post-shot all-cause mortality rates shows some batches are 3X deadlier than other batches from the same manufacturer when given at the same time to the same age 5-year age group.

And a Moderna batch can be 8X or more deadlier than a Pfizer batch given at the same time to the same age group.

This cannot happen if the vaccines are safe.

Replicating the analysis

You can generate the csv file with the batch analysis (vax_4.csv) by cloning the Github repo, going to the code directory and typing “make vax.”

If you just want to work with the data without regenerating it from the source, you can download the vax_4.xlsx file here.

Feel free to analyze the data and publish your own analysis.

Over a 9X increase in all-cause mortality across brands

Whenever you do batch analysis, the fairest way is to compare the one year mortality rate between batches given in the same month to the same 5 year age range. This minimizes confounders.

For example, let’s look at all the Pfizer and Moderna batches given to more than 100 people in February 2021 aged 70-74 and compute the 1 year mortality from the time of the shot.

Do you see how there is a huge variation within the same brand, and an even larger variation across brands? For a safe vaccine, the1 year mortality rates should be very similar to each other. They are not. The Pfizer brands were within 2X of each other, but Moderna had over a 9X higher all-cause mortality.

Moderna PR will tell you, “Nothing inspires safety like knowing you are getting a 9X higher all-cause mortality by choosing Moderna!” They should do this… people will eat it up.

Of course, health officials refuse to look at the data and the public is never told of the quality control problem.

More than 3X all-cause mortality variation between Pfizer batches

You can’t have a 3X higher all-cause mortality that depends on which batch you get. That’s insane. Here are two batches given in the same month to the same 5 year age range. You can repeat this for other younger 5 year age ranges and you get the same factor of 3 so this is not a fluke.

Continue reading

[Ed.:  How Bad is My Batch?]

 

What Happened to Trump’s 63 Million Doses of Hydroxychloroquine?  ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

By Dr. David Gortler, introduction and context by Dr. Robert Malone

SEP 10, 2024

“The modern nation-state, in whatever guise, is a dangerous and unmanageable institution, presenting itself on the one hand as a bureaucratic supplier of goods and services, which is always about to, but never actually does, give its clients value for money — and on the other as a repository of sacred values, which from time to time invites one to lay down one’s life on its behalf. . . . it is like being asked to die for the telephone company.” –Alasdair MacIntyre

“The general public is being reduced to a state where people not only are unable to find out about the truth, but also become unable to search for the truth because they are satisfied with deception and trickery that have determined their convictions, satisfied with a fictitious reality created by design through the abuse of language.” — Alasdair MacIntyre

In the context of COVID, although most associate me with speaking out in opposition to the gene therapy technology-based Spike vaccines (adenovirus and mRNA-based), at the beginning of the COVID crisis through into 2022 I was mainly focused on identifying, repurposing, and clinically testing existing drugs, and getting repurposed drugs and drug combinations for both hospital and outpatient use. Particularly notable was the role of my team and me in identifying and advocating for the use of the combination of Famotidine and Celecoxib +/- Ivermectin.

However, I was also very familiar with the data supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine. I vividly remember Dr. Peter Navarro calling one of my clients early in 2020 and trying to source additional doses. Dr. Zev Zelenko, whose early treatment protocol was based on use of Hydroxychloroquine, often sought my advice and once told me he considered me a mentor. I have personally met and spoken with esteemed French Professor Dr. Didier Raoult, who experienced one of the initial targeted COVID PsyWar attacks, for his work developing a treatment protocol combining hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. And I remember having to rapidly re-write a Famotidine clinical trial protocol to adapt to the declaration of hospital-restricted emergency use authorization for use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID.

What happened with the Trump/Navarro initiative involving stockpiling and deployment of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID is one of the most clear-cut and shocking case histories of globalized Deep/Administrative State and academic corruption combined with PsyWar deployment that I have ever encountered, and I had a front row seat for all of it. I know Rick Bright personally. I consider Peter Navarro a friend. I had a close, personal relationship with Dr. Zev Zelenko. I have never covered any of this in any podcast beyond the infamous Joe Rogan #1757 and this substack essay where I respond to an attack article regarding that podcast published by the Daily Mail.

In the following essay, Dr. Gortler provides a huge public service and homage to truth by exposing the fraud and malfeasance surrounding the demonization of the drug hydroxychloroquine during the COVIDcrisis.

This example of deployed PsyWar laid out by Dr. Gortler is incredible, as it shows the power of the administrative and deep state to coerce and bamboozle both a sitting president and his administration, as well as the American public, public health, and world governments.

How did this happen? In the Joe Rogan episode, I lay blame directly on Dr. Rick Bright (director of BARDA at the time), and Dr. Janet Woodcock (ex-acting director of the FDA). I stand by that. The real question is why and who or what corporation(s) were behind this?

When Rick was pushed out of his position as Director of BARDA (by Drs. Michael Callahan and Bob Kadlec), he landed an excellent, cushy job at the Rockefeller Institute. Who or what corporation drove the globally-coordinated smear campaign that attacked Trump, Navarro, Raoult, and anyone who advocated for early administration of hydroxychloroquine (+/- azithromycin or any other agent)?

I do remember asking (in 2020) CIA agent Dr. Michael Callahan about Raoult’s findings regarding hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and hearing him dismiss and smear both Raoult and the treatment without actually citing any data. Just bias. So I conclude from that experience that the CIA had some role in all of this sorry tale. The odd idea within the annotated DC insider elite seemed to be that only a specific anti-viral targeting SARS-CoV-2 could be clinically useful against the virus, rather than treating the symptoms of the disease.

Continue reading

 

Senator Johnson asks the FDA, CDC for data that will show the COVID vaccines are not safe   STEVE KIRSCH

Whoa. You are gonna LOVE this.

SEP 06, 2024

Executive summary

Senator Johnson is determined to expose the truth about the COVID vaccine. Because of that, he’s my favorite member of Congress, bar none.

He just sent an extraordinary letter to the CDC and FDA asking them for numbers that will reveal just how deadly these shots are.

You will love the letter he sent.

I can’t wait to hear their response.

Johnson’s letter

It’s all covered in this article which I urge you to read. Note: You can only see his letter if you are using a desktop browser.

Summary

The CDC and FDA always avoid commenting on other people’s data and analysis. That’s why Johnson asked them what the comparable US numbers are.

I can’t wait to see the reply.

If they are being honest, it should be “we don’t have a clue because we don’t collect the data here in the US.”

And that should be concerning to anyone with a working brain. We’ll be able to leverage anything they say.

If you like my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Thanks!

 

Flu Vaccines: All Risk and NO Benefit    BRUCHA WEISBERGER

Be smart and conduct a full investigation before an injection.

BS”D

SEP 05, 2024 – For many people, visiting their local pharmacy every fall for their annual flu shot is a ritual, one which they don’t stop to question.

But getting a flu shot should not be an “article of faith.”

Vaccination isn’t a commandment, is it?

There are major questions we should be asking:

•Is the flu vaccine effective at its stated goals of reducing hospitalization and death?

•Are there significant risks to getting the the flu vaccine?

•Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

In other words – do the shots work so well, and involve such minimal risk, that they create a net reduction in suffering and mortality? This is critical to know, as we certainly would not want to be increasing risk of serious illness or death.

Unfortunately, many people are getting flu vaccines automatically, not even thinking to question whether they actually work or not, nor whether they may cause very serious adverse effects.

🛑Does the flu shot prevent hospitalization and death?

Large bodies of evidence turn the common assumption on its head. Here are some key pieces:

•Robin Whittle, author of the nutritionmatters substack, highlights a fascinating 2020 study that was conducted on the data of over 7 million people in England and Wales spanning more than a decade, showing no benefit at all from flu shots – neither in hospital admission rates nor in death reduction – and if anything, negative efficacy (being vaccinated made things worse.) In fact, the findings were precise enough to discredit many previous studies.

Anderson et al. 2020 show that influenza vaccination of 60 to 70 year olds in England and Wales has no discernible positive impact on hospitalisation or deaths

Anderson et al. devised a powerful analysis based on an particular circumstance: In England and Wales, government policies lead to a very sharp rise in the proportion of people who are receive influenza vaccines once they turn 65.

Continue reading

[Ed.: Whoops:

EXCLUSIVE: Whistleblower and Combat Veteran ‘Unmasks the VA’s Unethical Experimentation’

 

Practice Management Tips for Spike Protein Illnesses  PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Dr. McCullough with Dr. Erica Williams

SEP 04, 2024 – Virtually every American has been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein either through COVID-19 infection or vaccination and because the vaccines are ineffective, for many they have had both exposures. As result the Spike protein and possibly the antibodies raised against it are producing a burden of disease never before seen in the clinic. This has been referred to by Parry et al as “spikeopathy.”

Academic medical centers have no grand rounds on the Spike protein. No management seminars. Big primary care CME operators such as PRIMED have ignored COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes. Thus doctors are drawing a blank when confronted with an obvious Spike protein blood clot or neurological problem.

I reached out to Dr. Erica Williams in Louisville, Kentucky to give us some insights into the Spike protein and the types of diseases she is now seeing in family practice. You will be amazed with her observations. Patients can help drive improvements in care by demanding antibody measurement to the Spike protein, risk stratification, and management specific to this abnormal protein as the cause of new illnesses.

Continue reading

 

COVID vaccinated kids are dying regularly from cardiac arrest   STEVE KIRSCH

It’s baffling that they try to normalize this as always happening. It was never a thing before the COVID vaccines rolled out.

SEP 04, 2024

Executive summary

VSRF’s Nurse Angela knows of 15 kids, under 20, who died from cardiac arrest. They were all vaccinated with the COVID vaccine.

I did a CDC Wonder search for ICD-10 code I46 which is cardiac arrest.

It shows that those under age 23 don’t die from cardiac arrest:

Today, it is the new normal if you’ve had the COVID shots.

Continue reading

 

If the COVID shots are so safe, then why have over 80% of NHS employees refused to take another booster?   STEVE KIRSCH

Former UK MP Andrew Bridgen just told me that over 80% of the NHS employees won’t take any more shots. I asked several AI models what this means.

SEP 03, 2024

Executive summary

The AI models all seem to agree that this is very troubling. It indicates that the COVID vaccines are not safe and effective, i.e., they lied to you.

Wow. Who would have guessed?

Read what the AI systems had to say.

ChatGPT

It’s a thought-provoking question, and it certainly raises valid concerns that need to be explored. The statistic you mention regarding NHS employees potentially refusing further COVID-19 boosters is indeed striking and could suggest a significant level of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals, who are often at the frontline of these public health measures.

The mainstream narrative typically promotes COVID-19 vaccines as being safe and effective, and for these vaccines, the regulatory bodies have given them emergency use authorization or full approval after assessing the risk-benefit ratio. However, the fact that a large percentage of health professionals may be opting out of additional boosters could indicate that their firsthand experience and observations might not align with the broader public messaging.

There could be several factors contributing to this phenomenon, and it’s important to consider them from multiple angles:

Adverse Effects and Observations: NHS employees, like other healthcare workers globally, have had unique insight into the immediate and short-term effects of the vaccines. They may be more acutely aware of any potential adverse effects, even those that are understated or underreported in official channels. This could contribute to a declining enthusiasm for further doses.

Questioning the Need for Boosters: As new variants of COVID-19 have emerged, the effectiveness of the original formulations of the vaccines against these variants has been called into question. If healthcare professionals perceive that the boosters are not providing significant additional protection, especially if they have already had previous doses, they might choose to forgo further shots.

Natural Immunity: Many healthcare workers have likely been exposed to the virus multiple times or have contracted COVID-19, potentially leading to natural immunity. There is ongoing debate in the scientific community about the durability and strength of natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity. Some may feel that their natural immunity is sufficient and thus may not see the need for additional vaccination.

Mistrust in Public Health Messaging: Throughout the pandemic, there has been a wide range of information and sometimes contradictory guidance from public health bodies. This inconsistency can erode trust, particularly among those who are supposed to be the most informed—healthcare workers. When trust diminishes, so does compliance with recommendations, even among medical professionals.

Vaccine Fatigue and Side Effects: The experience of side effects from previous shots, even if mild, can deter individuals from taking additional doses. The phenomenon of vaccine fatigue, especially in the context of a pandemic that has dragged on for years, could also play a role.

Continue reading

 

David Bell expands on the confirmed Moneypox numbers and the false emergency   MERYL NASS

BTW, It is only an STD if lesions are confined to the genital area.

SEP 01, 2024

https://brownstone.org/articles/mpox-numbers-and-reality/

So, here we are in 2024, on the tail of a massively profit-driving (and impoverishing) outbreak called Covid-19 that enabled the largest transfer of wealth from the many to the few in human history. The WHO’s announcement that 5,000 (or less) suspected Mpox cases is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) allows it to fast-track vaccines through its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) program, bypassing the normal rigor required to approve such pharmaceuticals, and is suggesting Pharma start lining up.

Did you catch that? By calling moneypox a PHEIC, vaccines that are not licensed in the country where they are to be used can be fast-tracked for use there, and presumably a liability waiver (as included in early version s of the IHR that were not passed) with be attached to their use.

Who wins when this foolish declaration is made?

  1. WHO
  2. The 3 manufacturers of moneypox vaccines (Bavarian Nordic, Emergent Biosolutions, and I do not know who will supply the unlicensed Japanese-developed vaccine). Bavarian Nordic and Emergent Biosolutions are both built on the back of biosecurity fear-porn, have no civilian business, and pump out dangerous products of no established value.
  3. the Biosecurity establishment

[Ed.:  Guess we really need to stop fucking monkeys!  Just give it up!]

 

There are only 4 ways to extract the truth from doctors about the harms caused by the COVID vaccines   STEVE KIRSCH

After 3 years of doing this, I’ve compiled a list of 4 methods to extract the truth about the safety and efficacy of the COVID shots.

SEP 01, 2024

Executive summary

Doctors have compelling stories. But fear and intimidation tactics keep them from speaking out.

There are 4 ways to extract the truth:

  1. Under oath in Congress
  2. Under oath in a court of law
  3. Press interview where the media relations department has consented to the interview
  4. Find retired doctors who don’t mind losing all their friends   [Emphasis added]

The first two methods are the most likely to elicit the truth, but it’s not a guarantee. Compliance can be as low as single digits.

The third method is the least effective, but can occasionally work as well. Making this more complicated of course is that the mainstream media just isn’t going to ask any questions.

I’m certain that within the next 12 months, we’ll see the truth start to come out since there are court cases which will reach the deposition stage at that point and I know doctors who have said that they will only tell the truth if forced to testify under oath. Otherwise, they will remain silent.

The four methods

There are are only two ways to extract the truth from doctors:

  1. Ask them to testify under oath in Congress
  2. Get them under oath in a deposition in a court case

Both cases are protected speech and cannot legally be used to remove their credentials or fire them.

However, these methods are not a guarantee. Even with those protections in place there are many people who will still lie because they are more afraid of the medical boards ending their careers than of being put in jail for perjury.

The third way which can also be used to extract the truth from a limited number of doctors is for the press to request an interview through the media relations department of the organization employing the doctor. The doctor still runs the risk of losing their medical license and board certifications by speaking the truth about what they observed.

The final way to find a retired doctor who doesn’t mind losing all his friends.

About my earlier military doctor post

I had to remove my post about observations from the military doctor I talked to because he was worried he would be put in prison for the rest of his life for talking to me without authorization.

Continue reading

 

RFK Jr. Calls for ‘Reckoning’ for ‘Immoral, Homicidal, Criminal Behavior’ During COVID-19 Pandemic  [3:56]   By Jim Hft

Sep. 1, 2024 1:40 pm – At the Limitless Expo, a gathering focused on financial freedom and strategic empowerment, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a powerful speech that reignited the debate over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kennedy didn’t mince words as he called for a reckoning for those responsible for what he described as “homicidal criminal behavior” during the pandemic.

Kennedy, who authored a controversial book about Anthony Fauci, used his platform at the expo to reiterate his claims against the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director.

“I wrote a book about Fauci. It’s a great book. There are 2,200 footnotes in the book… I invited people to find problems with the book… And nobody ever told us any factual error in that book,” Kennedy said.

He went on to accuse Fauci and other officials of using their positions to enforce “totalitarian controls that were not science-based,” arguing that their actions led to unnecessary deaths worldwide.

“It’s a story, really, of people involved in really terrible, immoral, homicidal criminal behavior,” he said.

One of the most explosive claims Kennedy made was about the suppression of COVID-19 treatments like Ivermectin.

He said that the FDA’s discouragement of such treatments was not based on science but on a desire to push the vaccine agenda.

“By depriving people of Ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe, died, and they didn’t need to,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy also touched on the rise in myocarditis cases among young people, particularly athletes, since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.

He cited alarming statistics, stating, “On average, it was, I think, 29 a month globally, athletes who died on the field. We’re getting down to hundreds a month now.”

In his conclusion, Kennedy warned that while the mainstream media has yet to fully acknowledge these issues, “the science is out there now, and it’s devastating.”

He called for accountability, stating, “There still has to be a reckoning.”

WATCH  

Continue reading

[Ed:

 

Most Variation in All-Cause Mortality Explained by Mass COVID-19 Vaccination   PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Australian Ecological Analysis Points to Vaccine Campaign Causing Rising Death Counts

SEP 01, 2024 – After a pandemic, all cause mortality should go down due to a culling effect of the frail and vulnerable. We saw acute COVID-19 become the proximate cause of death in many seniors who were in the final year of natural life.

Now an analysis from Allen indicates that all-cause mortality is up in heavily vaccinated Australia and that at least two thirds in the variation per region is explained by mass COVID-19 vaccination. There are numerous well-documented fatal vaccine serious adverse events which are piling up months and years after the shots. Cumulative toxicity is another factor as a single person is not vaccinated just with the primary series (first two injections), but continued dosing every six months.

These data call for a direct data merge of the vaccine administration and death data in Australia to explore these very uncomfortable relationships. Because the Australian government pushed the vaccines so hard, officials have been stonewalling the public on this important next analysis.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Allen, DE. 2024. The correlation between Australian Excess Deaths by State and Booster Vaccinations. Medical Research Archives, [online] 12(7). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v1 2i7.5485

 

LIFESAVING LABOR DAY SALE: Summer COVID Surge Shows We May Have to Return to 2020 SCAMDEMIC Measures   2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD

Lockdowns and boosters incoming…

AUG 31, 2024 – The powers that be are becoming increasingly desperate as we rapidly careen toward the presidential election. The current slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” uptake is approaching zero, and BigPharma’s stocks are cratering. The untenable debt supercycle and global financial markets are more super-fragile than ever. The doomsday clock has never been closer to midnight than right now.

Meanwhile, the genetically modified humans are suffering from VAIDS, and a scamdemic coverup for all of the surging “vaccine” adverse events is long overdue. With decimated immune systems and severe chronic inflammation due to the cytotoxic spike proteins (SP2) that the “vaccinated” and their reprogrammed DNA are endogenously producing non-stop, even the common cold is now a potentially life threatening condition.

According to an article from the Mockingbird MSM outlet The Hill entitled, Summer COVID surge shows we may have to return to 2020 pandemic measuresthe VAIDS epidemic is gaining full steam heading straight into the upcoming flu season; to wit:

As summer 2024 draws to a close, the U.S. finds itself once again grappling with a surge in COVID-19 infections. 

With the majority of Americans “vaccinated,” we now have further proof that the “Safe and Effective” Modified mRNA poisons are anything but; in other words, we are only just getting started:

This wave has taken many people by surprise, particularly as the country has largely consigned the pandemic to the past. While public life has pretty much returned to pre-pandemic norms — something almost none of us would have believed in the summer of 2020 — the virus itself has not.

No vaccine injected into the shoulder could ever offer even a scintilla of protection for a respiratory disease, nor would it stop transmission, nor would it attenuate symptoms in the slightest; in fact, it is scientifically impossible to vaccinate against a flu season, or a gain of function “pandemic” at that. It is also impossible to vaccinate against a constantly mutating virus, since by the time the doses are distributed that viral strain is long gone.

Mutations of the virus continue to occur, and new variants are emerging, posing ongoing challenges to public health and safety. As we look ahead to the remainder of 2024 and into early 2025, we need to take stock of where we are, understand the factors driving this resurgence and better anticipate how the pandemic might evolve.

The viral variant argument is just more of the same VAIDS coverup, and an absurdly false narrative that they are attempting to deploy in order to evolve their scamdemic followup.

Continue reading

Total Page Visits: 59 - Today Page Visits: 1
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.