COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .
RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie [1:00:59]
Premiered Aug 11, 2025
This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com
00:00 Intro
02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues
06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative
06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines
07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment
08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines
09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone
12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination
14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health
14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects
17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns
18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community
21:17 Explaining mRNA
23:45 How mRNA vaccines work
27:06 Spike protein and possible effects
30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings
32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance
33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children
34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues
39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology
42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues
45:12 History of mRNA vaccines
46:44 Modified mRNA technology
48:40 mRNA research status in 2017
49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017
49:33 Progress in mRNA technology
49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic
55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome
57:06 Doctors offering assistance
[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:
1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio
2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism
4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition
On the Tylenol-autism causation announced by HHS and Trump 9/22/2025 SASHA LATYPOVA
SEP 24, 2025
On September 22, 2025, President Donald Trump and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced federal guidance cautioning pregnant women against using acetaminophen, the active ingredient in generic medicine Tylenol, due to observational studies linking prenatal exposure to higher risks of autism and ADHD in children. The FDA will update product labels, issue alerts to physicians, and launch a public awareness campaign, while committing to further research on neurodevelopmental effects; the administration also promoted leucovorin as a treatment for folate deficiency in some autistic children.
This article’s purpose is to provide an independent review on the statements/determinations made by Trump and HHS leadership, declaring that Tylenol was one of the identified causes of autism.
I stole this graphic from Anthony Freda:
Since there isn’t an immediate summary of the basis for this regulatory/administrative action, I used ChatGPT to query for the studies that the FDA/HHS used to come up with the determination of causality of autism by Tylenol. The limitation of this approach may be that GPT did not produce some completely Tylenol-damning study because it is a piece of software written by the cabal controllers to control the narrative. If you are aware of a study that the FDA used but GPT omitted from this output, please let me know and post in comments.
One thing to note upfront: the FDA did not say “Tylenol causes autism.” The FDA initiated a label-change process and issued a Notice to Physicians because it found that a growing body of evidence shows an association between prenatal acetaminophen use and higher rates of neurodevelopmental outcomes (including autism and ADHD). This action was driven by epidemiologic studies (descriptive statistical exercises that cannot establish causality, for the most part), some mechanistic/animal work, and its internal review which is still undisclosed.
Below is a summary of data that has allegedly informed the HHS/Trump’s announcement. Briefly:
What the FDA did: opened a formal process to change labeling and issued clinician guidance because of a body of observational evidence suggesting a possible link and because of precautionary concern about fetal exposure.
A very bizarre thing that the FDA did: asked GSK to expand the label indication for the drug called leucovorin that GSK stopped selling 28 years ago, and is now generic. The reasons or data that the FDA relied on to issue this request remain obscure as of now. Discussed further below.
What the FDA did not do: declare definitive causation. The agency’s materials explicitly state causality is not established and that studies are mixed.
Most importantly, NONE of the studies control for or examine vaccination status as possible causation of autism! This cannot be emphasized strongly enough. Without asking this question – no answer will be found. Ever. This is by design. This is like asking whether wooden or concrete bridges cause suicides. Irrelevant! However, bridges are associated with them and a weak statistical link can be conjured up if enough data is thrown into the analysis.
What did the FDA cite as basis for their decision about Tylenol?
1. Epidemiological (human) studies and meta-analyses:
Large pregnancy-cohort and registry studies from multiple countries (Denmark, Norway, U.S., and others) have reported statistical associations between maternal acetaminophen use in pregnancy and higher risk in offspring for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and ADHD. Some recent high-profile reports (e.g., Mount Sinai, Harvard-affiliated reviews) are the primary empirical basis cited.
Reviews and meta-analyses show mixed results as they almost always do, unless one looks at the vaccination as an important independent variable (which “gold standard science” NEVER does): several find a modest association, while other studies, including sibling-comparison designs that better control family-level confounding, reduce or eliminate the association.
2. Mechanistic and animal/toxicology research
Some laboratory and animal studies have suggested plausible biological pathways by which acetaminophen exposure could affect fetal neurodevelopment (e.g., effects on neurotransmitter systems or oxidative stress), and such mechanistic work was part of the overall evidence package the agency reviewed. These studies are generally supportive but not definitive for human causation. (See FDA summary and accompanying references.)
3. Internal FDA/HHS review
The Sept 22 action allegedly followed an internal review. It remains unclear and therefore, contrary to “MAHA’s gold [f-ing] standard science” promises, NOT TRANSPARENT to anyone what exactly “the experts (TM)” relied on to issue forth their wisdoms….
I tried to crowdsource some additional evidence on Tylenol being THE causative agent of autism and posted this as question on X. I got some replies, such as the link to a website dedicated to this issue PreventAutism.org which lists 24 “lines of evidence” in support of this theory. Upon a detailed review, I found that these 24 lines do not include studying vaccination status ALONE as an independent cause of autism. The only mention of such attempt is Line #15 which says: “Administration of acetaminophen along with vaccine administration but not vaccination alone is associated with autism.” This suggests a claim that it’s acetaminophen used at or around vaccine times rather than vaccines per se. But this is a description of an association claimed by PreventAutism, not a reference to a peer-reviewed paper that compellingly shows vaccination status was adjusted for. The page does not clearly list which study supports that line and whether vaccination status was covaried.
By running a broader literature search (outside of what’s cited by PreventAutism), I found:
- a case-control paper Acetaminophen use after MMR vaccine & autism that looks at acetaminophen use after the MMR vaccine and autism. That means vaccination timing is involved. But that study doesn’t treat vaccination status (i.e. vaccinated vs unvaccinated) as a general covariate; it’s looking within vaccinated children whether acetaminophen after MMR is associated. So vaccination status is baked in (all have had MMR) rather than comparing vaccinated vs unvaccinated.
- The large JAMA cohort study (Ahlqvist et al. 2024) which many news outlets reference, I didn’t find mention that vaccination status was used as a covariate (it focused on acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy, sibling control, etc.)
- The NIH-funded cord blood study likewise looks at acetaminophen / byproducts exposure levels from birth and subsequent ASD/ADHD diagnoses. I saw no indication in summaries that vaccination status was adjusted for in those models.
4. FDA’s September 22, 2025 Notice to Physicians
I’ve bolded the key sentences where the agency explicitly states that causation is not established:
Source: Notice to Physicians on the Use of Acetaminophen During Pregnancy — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Sept 22, 2025. (PDF).
In recent years, evidence has accumulated suggesting that the use of acetaminophen by pregnant women may be associated with an increased risk of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD in children. Some studies have described that the risk may be most pronounced when acetaminophen is taken chronically throughout pregnancy to childbirth. These concerns may be greater when acetaminophen is used in high doses or for prolonged periods.
The FDA has reviewed published human epidemiological studies, systematic reviews, and relevant animal and mechanistic research regarding acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Based on this review, FDA is initiating the process to update the labeling for acetaminophen-containing products to include information regarding the accumulating evidence of a possible association between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.
Important: An association in observational studies does not by itself prove that acetaminophen causes these conditions. Available studies have limitations, including potential confounding factors (for example, the underlying illness or fever that led to acetaminophen use), differences in exposure measurement, and variability in outcome ascertainment across studies.
At this time, causality has not been established. Nevertheless, given the potential public health implications and the widespread use of acetaminophen during pregnancy, the agency is taking a precautionary approach.
Clinicians should continue to balance the risks and benefits when advising pregnant patients: while untreated pain and fever can themselves carry risks to the pregnant person and fetus, it may be appropriate to counsel patients to use the lowest effective dose of acetaminophen for the shortest duration necessary during pregnancy, and to consider non-pharmacologic approaches when appropriate. Pregnant patients [note to MAHA FDA – repeat after me: women! they are all women!!!] with fever or significant pain should discuss treatment options with their health care provider, as fever in pregnancy can pose important risks and may require treatment.
The FDA will provide updates as it finalizes labeling changes and as new evidence becomes available.
5. Bizarre FDA decision on leucovorin
As reported by the mainstream press (Endpoints News), in an unprecedented move, the FDA is calling on GSK to update the label for a now-generic drug called leucovorin that it stopped selling more than 28 years ago, claiming an agency review of the medical literature shows it might help with autism.
Typically, the FDA only asks companies to change the label on a drug when there are concerns about a drug’s safety or efficacy, narrowing its usage. Outside of cancer, where the FDA has a program to review older oncology drug labels, it’s almost unheard of for the agency to independently push to expand the use of a drug into a new disease.
And in this case, it’s still unclear exactly what data the FDA is relying on. An HHS spokesperson told Endpoints News that an “analysis across 23 publications from 2009-2024 demonstrated the effectiveness for” cerebral folate deficiency (CFD), which is a neurological condition with developmental delays associated with autism. The spokesperson said the analysis shows that “overall, 85% of patients experienced some type of clinical benefit including improved speech/communication capabilities.”
But the spokesperson didn’t provide links or names of the studies, and the analysis hasn’t been published by the government.
“For the FDA to decide based on a non-public review of some unclear past literature of dubious quality that a drug works for a certain indication that was never part of a drug’s original indication and then tell the public that the drug works for that purpose and THEN tell the manufacturer (which seemingly hasn’t made the drug in 25 years) to identify the right dose and conditions for use for some future labeling update is absolutely not normal,” Harvard Medical School professor Aaron Kesselheim told Endpoints via email. “It is in a different universe from normal.”
I find myself in an uncomfortable space – a wholehearted agreement on this issue with a Harvard professor. He is, nevertheless, correct: the drug was never studied in prospective randomized clinical trials for this indication, the data on which this recommendation is made is secret and the whole thing is unfathomably unprecedented, and rather stupid I must add…
All I can say about this: the FDA decisions are not transparent, at least not yet. Some of it is based on very thin or non-existent evidence, and some – defies any logic, reason, pharmaceutical regulatory practice, and potentially even law (at least legal precedent). While it is exciting to see the liberals lose their minds yet again and chug bottles of Tylenol all over social media, I don’t feel like popping that champagne cork quite yet. I fully realize that for some people – those who have been in the fight far longer than I have – these announcements, and especially Trump making some mentions as to vaccines as possible cause of autism may feel like great vindication, I ask all of you to not lower your guard just yet. This is not the time.
Trump says shit all the time, and then says the opposite shit a few minutes later. This is how chaos is created, on purpose, so that – Ordo ab Chao – Order from chaos can be manufactured in pursuit of The New World Order. Speaking of which. Yesterday I landed at San Francisco on my way back home. Just a few minutes into my Uber ride, what do I see? They are not hiding anymore:
Press release regarding the case against the orchestrators of the Covid-19 The Great Reset Project in the Netherlands SASHA LATYPOVA
SEP 23, 2025
This is a brief update on the status of the case against the officials of the state of Netherlands, including Mark Rutte (now Sec Gen of NATO), Albert Bourla, Bill Gates and others. Katherine Watt and I have previously posted our testimonies that have been submitted to the court as part of this appeal (both linked in this post):
Netherlands case update: appeal of Aug. 20, 2025 order denying application for preliminary evidence proceedings; appeal filed Sept. 15, 2025. SASHA LATYPOVA
SEP 18, 2025 Press Release, September 22, 2025, from attorney Peter Stassen:
Appeal in the application procedure C/17/199273 / HA RK 25-17 On Monday, September 15, 2025, the day the “Coronavaccine Autumn 2025” program was launched in the Netherlands, an appeal was filed against the decision of the District Court of Northern Netherlands (Leeuwarden) of August 20, 2025. Part of this appeal is an invocation of the doctrine of breaking the statutory prohibition on appealing in cases like this (the doctrine of breaking the ban on appeal). The notice of appeal explained that there was no fair trial in the proceedings at first instance within the meaning of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The notice of appeal also includes a request for interim relief during the course of the proceedings, aimed at hearing the nominated experts in a public hearing with unhindered access for the public and journalists. The urgent and significant public interest in the appeal and the requested relief was explained in an accompanying letter to the court and the defendants’ lawyers. The appeal is supported by two extensive written statements from Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, accompanied by over a gigabyte of verifiable documents relating to their conclusions. The applicants and their lawyer are convinced that the conclusions of Latypova and Watt cannot be rebutted with well-founded arguments due to their quality, transparency, and substantiation. Telephone contact with the court registry reveals that the notice of appeal has been received in seven copies and is being administratively filed. On Monday, September 22, 2025, 12 additional copies of the petition were delivered to the court registry, so that the court now has 19 copies, as prescribed by the court’s regulations. The Court, and thus the State of the Netherlands and (the lawyers for) the respondents, have thus obtained very convincing evidence that a planned genocide is being carried out without scruples as a project (Covid-19: The Great Reset). In the view of the applicants, this serious crime is being committed against the group of people who place their trust in what is being touted as a vaccine, but is indistinguishable from a bioweapon, to be destroyed in whole or in part. These are the current developments regarding the appeal procedure.
Substantive proceedings C/17/190788 23/172 In the main proceedings, which are being conducted on behalf of seven plaintiffs, one of whom died as a result of the Covid-19 injections, a decision on the case is expected from the District Court of Noord-Nederland on October 1, 2025. This decision will determine the court’s decision on the further course of the proceedings. As usual, there will be no public hearing in the presence of the parties, the public, or the press. The court is expected to rule on the plaintiffs’ increase in their claim, which essentially means that the declaratory judgment they are seeking will extend until the final judgment is rendered. This is in light of the fact that the Covid-19: The Great Reset project, in which the Covid-19 injections are of great importance, is being rigorously pursued. Information Provision A new press release will follow as soon as any significant developments arise. Please note once again that all legal documents are published on the foundation’s website.
Peter Stassen
The Autism Debate Explodes: Hyper-Vaccination, the Tylenol Cover, and Aluminum’s Exit NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on Lindell TV’s DC Dispatch with Kristi Leigh
SEP 23, 2025
I joined Kristi Leigh on Lindell TV’s DC Dispatch to unpack the most explosive developments yet in the autism debate:
BREAKING: White House Announces Tylenol–Autism Link, Opens Door to Vaccines NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH SEP 22, 2025 Read full story
There are four vaccines given in pregnancy, and all list fever as an adverse effect in their package inserts. Women are then told to take Tylenol to manage the vaccine-induced fever. The same pattern occurs in childhood: most vaccine package inserts list fever as a common side effect, and parents are instructed to give Tylenol to manage it.
Yet when studies link Tylenol to autism, none account for vaccination — even though vaccine-induced fevers are a primary reason Tylenol is taken. However, because Tylenol depletes glutathione — the body’s primary detoxification system — it may serve as an amplifier in the pathway to developmental regression. In this way, Tylenol does not replace vaccines as the central trigger, but it can magnify the risk of harm:
Aluminum Removal Underway — Other Risks Remain NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH SEP 22, 2025 Read full story
Just yesterday, it was announced that aluminum adjuvants will be removed from childhood vaccines. That’s a massive step, given decades of evidence linking aluminum to neurotoxicity, asthma, and autism — including autopsy findings of aluminum accumulation in the brains of autistic children. But this is not the end of the problem. Vaccines still contain other toxins and are administered in combinations that overload a child’s developing immune and nervous system. Compound vaccination and the “toxic load” remain the core danger.
CDC Sued Over the 72-Dose Childhood Schedule
BREAKING: CDC Sued for Pushing Illegal 72-Dose Childhood Vaccine Schedule NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH AUG 18, 2025 Read full story
The CDC is now being sued for operating an illegal and unconstitutional hyper-vaccination program — 72 doses from birth to age 18. Crucially, these shots have never been tested for cumulative safety. No long-term placebo-controlled trials, no assessment of what happens when multiple vaccines are given in combination. The lawsuit challenges the very foundation of this untested schedule and could open the door to medical choice, exemptions, and long-overdue accountability.
The tide is turning. Autism is finally being reframed in the context of policy failure, captured science, and the dangerous vaccine regime that has gone unchallenged for far too long.
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org
Where’s Fauci? CLANDESTINE
SEP 23, 2025
Trump just told the world that everyone needs to stop making biological weapons.
I wonder what prompted him to say that?
I’m just spitballing here, but maybe it has something to do with a man-made pathogen that shut down the world and killed MILLIONS of people…
Where’s Fauci?
Why did he give himself a blanket pardon beginning in 2014? The same time the Obama administration offshored gain of function to UKRAINE!!
Why did Hunter Biden give himself a blanket pardon beginning in 2014? The same time his biolab company, Metabiota, began receiving USAID grants to study bat coronaviruses in UKRAINE!!
When did the CIA/State Dept take over Ukraine? 2014.
Why did the entire global Western media apparatus lie and say there were no biolabs in Ukraine whatsoever?
The enemy told us what they did via their attempts to cover it up.
Patriot TV: We Don’t Have to Let the Medical Industrial Complex Control or Kill Us
Crimes Against Humanity CLANDESTINE
SEP 23, 2025
Trump just dropped one of the biggest disclosures of all time.
He called to end the development of biological weapons.
The thing is, we already agreed to that. It’s called the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972. Bioweapon development is already an international war crime and/or crime against humanity.
Which means, that nations or NGOs are currently engaged in bioweapon development, which is a serious violation of international law, and Trump knows about it.
Russian MIL have been presenting evidence to the UN for 3+ years outlining the US bioweapon network worldwide, but most notably Ukraine. They directly allege the leaders of the US Democrat Party, in conjunction with NGOs and elements within the US government, have been wittingly developing bioweapons at USAID-funded labs worldwide.
They even directly named Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Soros, as the main “ideologues” of the plot. Elon even said himself that DOGE found USAID was funding bioweapon development (Project PREDICT).
If you think Trump and Putin have not discussed this at some point during negotiations, you are mistaken.
The world must eventually cross this bridge, and I think we are getting very close. US Deep State actors are/were engaged in bioweapon development, are guilty of crimes against humanity, and Russia alleges it’s the same exact people who are behind the treasonous Russiagate plot against Trump.
It’s all connected. The Dems created and released a biological weapon (C19) in order to sabotage Trump’s Presidency, implement mass mail-in voting, all to steal the 2020 election and overthrow Trump.
Covid was the next phase of the Deep Stare regime-change operation to overthrow Trump after Russigate failed, The Deep State shut down the global economy, and killed millions of people, all to stop Trump from winning 2020.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!
Trump Knows the Truth About Covid CLANDESTINE
SEP 23, 2025
I don’t think people realize the earth-shattering magnitude of what just happened…
Trump just stood up in front of the UN General Assembly, and told them all to their faces that they must stop making biological weapons.
This means Trump knows Covid was a man-made bioweapon… Which means he knows who is responsible for making Covid… Which means someone is responsible for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!!!
What has been one of the most talked about subjects at the UN since February 2022? US bioweapon development at USAID-funded biolabs around the world, most notably UKRAINE!!!
Russia have been talking about the need for investigations into US bioweapon development for years now at the UN, and have been ignored and vetoed by the US every single time. The specifically named Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Soros, of being the main ideologues of this plot.
Trump’s DNI Gabbard has been all over this since the jump, and she told us back in May that she was working with RFK Jr., Bhattacharya, and Ratcliffe, to look into the origins of Covid, and she specifically mentioned the biolabs in Ukraine multiple times.
In conclusion, Trump knows the truth about Covid, and it sounds like he is getting closer to telling the public.
[Ed.: Trump told the UN that the world must stop making bioweapons. There are 46 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine…]
Covid-Vaxxed VAIDS Patients May Never Recover, Scientists Warn Frank Bergman
September 22, 2025 Slay News
Leading experts in Canada and the United States are sounding the alarm as Covid mRNA shot-induced Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS) patients are now showing no signs of recovery.
VAIDS, often referred to as vaccine-induced AIDS, Post-Covid Vaccination Syndrome (PCVS), or “long vax,” is a new phenomenon that was triggered by the global mass Covid mRNA injection campaign.
As Slay News has previously reported, VAIDS is an AIDS-like disorder that is triggered by Covid mRNA shots damaging the immune system, leading to autoimmune diseases.
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sounded the alarm about the crisis during a pair of roundtables, insisting that the voices of vaccine-injured patients and the frontline doctors treating them must finally be heard.
The discussions, which included medical experts, senators, and patients suffering from VAIDS, revealed grim findings: those harmed by the mRNA injections often “don’t seem to be improving,” even years later.
Former CDC Director Robert Redfield warned that the condition is unlike anything doctors have faced before.
Redfield revealed that many VAIDS patients may never recover.
“There really is probably a difference between patients with post-mRNA injury versus people that have post-COVID symptoms,” Redfield said.
“I will say my post-mRNA injury patients have a tendency of not improving.
“They just don’t seem to be improving.
“I have a number of patients now that are out five years. It’s painful.”
By contrast, Redfield noted, those with “long Covid,” which has similar symptoms to Post-Covid Vaccination Syndrome (PCVS), generally do improve over time.
Kennedy explained why he convened the roundtables: because patients nationwide are suffering, lost in the system, and “don’t know where to go and feel that their voices aren’t being listened to.”
Millions Potentially Affected
Panelists credited Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) for pushing the administration to act on behalf of the estimated 20 million Americans now experiencing PCVS.
Emerging science is backing them up.
A bombshell preprint study from renowned scientists at Yale University showed that some patients thought to have “long Covid” were in fact suffering from VAIDS.
Persistent spike protein was detected in VAIDS patients 709 days after vaccination.
The researchers noted that the vaccine-induced AIDS was caused by the Covid mRNA injection’s spike protein circulating in the body and increasing in levels over time.
Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, one of the study’s co-authors, said:
“That was surprising, to find spike protein in circulation at such a late time point.”
The spike protein is a “mechanism” that is “underlying this syndrome,” Iwasaki noted.
The explosive findings sent shockwaves through the medical and scientific communities after researchers concluded that Covid mRNA shots have caused a global surge in cases of VAIDS.
This major study, which included nine million participants, debunked claims from the corporate media and so-called “fact-checkers” that previously dismissed reports of VAIDS as “conspiracy theories.”
Meanwhile, a sweeping review published this month in Reviews in Medical Virology documented mounting evidence of PCVS: fatigue, brain fog, neuropathy, dysautonomia, myocarditis, and autoimmune-like illnesses.
The study was led by Dr. Shin Jie Yong and an international team spanning institutions, including Université de Montréal in Canada.
Researchers emphasized that while causality is contested, the patterns of injury are undeniable, and the medical needs of these patients are urgent.
Doctors & Patients Demand Action
The evidence shows that vaccine-injured patients present with a spectrum of debilitating conditions: POTS, small-fiber neuropathy, ME/CFS-like illness, and even prion-like disease processes.
Yet treatments remain piecemeal — IVIG, plasma exchange, antihistamines, neuropathic agents — with no large-scale trials to guide care.
Kennedy and the roundtable doctors agreed: the era of ignoring these patients is over.
“Science moves forward when dissent isn’t censored and patients aren’t silenced,” Kennedy said, stressing that open debate and real research are the only path forward.
Media Narrative Crumbles
Meanwhile, the corporate press still pushes the claim that mRNA shots reduce long Covid.
However, this line conveniently avoids the uncomfortable reality that many “long Covid” cases are actually “vaccine” injuries in disguise.
The new data and testimonies expose a collapsing narrative: the same officials who promised safety and transparency are now scrambling to suppress evidence of lasting harm.
Kennedy’s roundtables mark a turning point and provide an official acknowledgment that VAIDS and post-vaccine syndromes are real, widespread, and devastating.
The message from frontline doctors was clear: these patients are not improving.
And until the government admits the truth, millions of Americans will remain abandoned by the very system that harmed them.
READ MORE – Japan Confirms Over 600,000 Citizens Killed by Covid ‘Vaccines’
Tylenol Tied to Autism? Or is it a Convenient Scapegoat? (VIDEO)
WATCH: President Trump Makes Major Announcement on Autism and Vaccines
[Ed.: ‘Look over here (at Tylenol), and not over there (at vaccines)’
Trump and RFK Jr. Announce FDA Warning on Tylenol Use in Pregnancy, Citing Autism Risk
September 22, 2025 Jewish Breaking News
WASHINGTON D.C. — In a dramatic public statement today, President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will immediately notify physicians nationwide about recent evidence suggesting that using acetaminophen (often sold as Tylenol) during pregnancy may be linked with an increased risk of autism in children.
At the press conference, Trump was emphatic: “Taking Tylenol is NOT GOOD. I’ll say it. IT’S NOT GOOD.”
Kennedy Jr. joined in urging caution. He said pregnant women should limit the use of acetaminophen unless it is absolutely necessary (for example, in the case of a high fever or serious pain), noting that in a small number of cases the risk appears higher when acetaminophen is used chronically throughout pregnancy.
The announcement includes plans for a safety label change for acetaminophen and a public‐service campaign aimed at informing both medical professionals and expectant mothers.
However, the move has sparked criticism from some in the scientific and medical communities. Experts point out that so far, the studies showing a connection are observational and show association—not proof of causation. Others warn that untreated fever in pregnancy also carries its own risks.
WHITE HOUSE MEETING 9/22/25
“Profound Autism is not seen in older population because this is new. TYLENOL CAN CAUSE AUTISM do NOT take it!” mixed with vaccines make it worse. During pregnancy can lead to autism. FOLATE DEFIENCY is seen in autism with help offered by FDA Leucovorin!
“80 different vaccines for babies are too much, babies are healthy until vaccines, we will remove mercury, aluminum. MMR needs to be split up, not 3 at once. Only take 4-5 shots.
Hep B shot at birth is bad! It’s a sexual disease!
THIS IS THE TEAM that just made history – autism used to be 1:20,000.
TODAY 1:12 California boys have autism 1:31 in states that dont force school shots. Dr Dorothy Fink, Dr Oz, Dr Battacharya NIH, Kennedy HHS, Prof Makary, Pres Trump! TWO MOTHERS.
Amish, Cuba, Vietnam have no Tylenol and no autism, until vaccines.
Dr Bhattacharya said autism can be as mild as social issues, struggle to speak,
The Covid Response Was Not a Mistake BY DAVID BELL
It Was Just Wrong
SEP 20, 2025 Brownstone Institute
The Covid response was not an error, and it was not the result of rushing to address a crisis due to an unknown pathogen. It was a lot of people, mostly professionals in the field, systematically and collectively doing what they knew was wrong. It is helpful when this is systematically laid out, as such facts can form a basis from which to stop it being repeated.
Early in 2025, some statisticians from Scotland and Switzerland wrote a discussion paper with a characteristically (for Scots and Swiss) understated, even boring, title: “Some statistical aspects of the Covid-19 response.” Good science is stated clearly without fanfare, while “bombshell” announcements, or similar rants indicate a need to embellish. Good data speaks for itself. However, it only speaks widely if people read it.
The paper, by Wood and co-authors, was written for presentation at a meeting of the Royal Statistical Society in April 2025 in London. It remains one of the best reviews of the early response to Covid – in this case with a United Kingdom focus but relevant globally. However, some people don’t avidly read the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society – Series A: Statistics in Society, or attend their London meetings. A pity, as London is nice for three days in summer and this particular Royal Society seems to have a grasp of reality lacking in some of its siblings.
The paper provides simple statistical truths, as statisticians should. Truths are particularly valuable when applied to subjects where fallacies are more profitable. This is why, in public health, they have become so rare, and therefore so worth reading. Stating truths dispassionately regarding Covid helps to grasp how bad the public health response actually was.
Covid and the Economy
Public health has always been highly dependent on economic health, so the authors set the scene by stating the obvious of the economics of the response of Western governments that decided in early 2020 that printing money was simpler than making people work to generate taxes:
Creating money while reducing real economic activity is obviously inflationary.
And consequently:
The subsequent sharp increase in inflation is one path by which the disruption has contributed to increased economic deprivation…of the sort clearly linked to substantially reduced life expectancy and quality of life.
This is important, because we knew this long before 2020 (the Romans knew it) and we also knew that the resultant economic deprivation would shorten life expectancy. This is Public Health 101, and every public health physician knew it when Covid started.
In public health, we recognize that there is a tradeoff between spending money to save one person or allocating it elsewhere to save many more. If we just spend without limit, we all get poor and then we cannot really fund healthcare at all. This is not complicated, people understand it. It is why we don’t have MRI scanners in every village. We therefore make estimates of how much can save a life without overly impoverishing society and then losing more. Wood and colleagues looked at the UK standard for this compared to the costs of lockdowns:
…any reasonable estimate of the cost per life year saved from Covid by non pharmaceutical interventions substantially exceeds the £30K per life year threshold usually applied by NICE (the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) when approving introduction of a pharmaceutical Intervention……
[Using the high 500,000 predicted mortality with minimal intervention of Neil Ferguson et al. at Imperial College, this] gives a cost per life year saved over 10 times the NICE threshold.
Again, this is basic public health. Allocating health resources is a complicated issue as it is (rightly) tied in ethics and emotion, but on a societal scale it is how we manage our health budgets. In this case, the numbers predicted to be saved through the enormous costs of lockdowns never remotely made sense.
However, the UK government, like governments elsewhere under the same apparent media-Pharma yoke, simply ignored costs and benefits calculations and plowed on regardless. Guided by its Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), the UK government embarked on a campaign to mislead the public into taking actions they could reasonably expect to be massively harmful on an individual and national level. They knew the campaign to instill fear was unjustified; a campaign of misinformation aimed at the same public who paid them. Wood and colleagues provide “one of the milder examples:”
…a widely displayed government poster picturing a healthy woman in her mid twenties in a mask with the slogan ‘I wear this to protect you. Please wear yours to protect me.’
The actual risk profile that the UK government and SPI-B had at that time is shown in the Figure below, provided in the paper.
This is where statisticians are useful – to provide context in place of anecdote and fear. They provide a good one:
…the current best estimate for the return time of a super-volcanic eruption of the civilization ending magnitude that city dwellers are unlikely to survive is 17 thousand years (Rougier et al., 2018). Even only considering the two years of the pandemic this is likely larger than the Covid risk to the woman pictured.
So logically, if they were being logical about Covid, the UK government should now be gutting their economy to prepare for the aftermath of a super-volcano. But let’s not suggest that, as they might just do it.
Explaining Covid Burden
The UK government’s efforts to mislead the public regarding Covid-19 risk were not a case of dealing with an unknown virus, as many are now claiming:
Risk was known early 2020: Diamond Princess, and e.g. Verity et al., 2020; Wood et al., 2020, from Chinese data.
Case fatality data from Figure 3 (B) in Verity et al. published in March 2020 by Imperial College London, noting minimal risk of Covid mortality among young and middle-aged people (i.e. those removed from work and school).
Irrespective, the UK government maintained that Covid was severe and debilitating in young fit people, potentially (as Wood and co-authors note) using actors and fabricated stories, and thereby simply lying to people. The UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) did its part by, as the authors demonstrate from various studies, also misrepresenting the frequency of long Covid.
SPI-B advice on masks was also strange, being at odds with their own citations, thereby grossly exaggerating their impact. This is a strange one – why would a government convince the public to cover their faces, knowing that they are basing their advice on falsehoods, running against previous advice, and that it will not significantly help anyone? This is where bad intent starts to look increasingly part of the approach.
The authors then note:
This type of misleading and selective use of statistical evidence was not limited to the media. For example in 2021 the official online Scottish government advice on face coverings stated that
Scientific evidence and clinical and public health advice is clear that face coverings are an important part of stopping the spread of coronavirus.
and provided a link for the scientific evidence. This turned out to be a SPI-B/SAGE advice summary18, which cited two pieces of scientific evidence, apparently suggesting transmission reductions from mask wearing of 6-15%, or up to 45%, respectively. The paper cited as evidence for the first figure was in fact an editorial (Cowling and Leung, 2020), which also pointed out that the paper cited for the 45% figure (Mitze et al., 2020) was flawed (the design appears unable to pick up the case in which mask wearing is actually harmful, for example). The editorial’s figure is quoting a properly conducted meta-analysis (Brainard et al., 2020) which actually concluded
. . .wearing a mask may slightly reduce the odds of primary infection with [Influenza Like Illness] by around 6 to 15% [. . . ] This was low-quality evidence.
Again, this government was unequivocably misleading their own people into a major behavioral change whilst having evidence that it would not be of use; either negligence or simply lying.
Mortality
The discussion of Wood and colleagues on quantifying mortality becomes really interesting, demonstrating how difficult this actually is. Firstly, when Covid hit in 2020, the babies born immediately after the Second World War were just turning 75. There were 31% more babies born in the UK in the year after the war’s end compared to the previous year, and high birth rates continued in subsequent years. There is nothing magic about 75, but the point is a mass of the British public, born in the few years after the War, were entering ages of rapidly increasing mortality.
This is a driver of ‘excess mortality’ not widely discussed. It means there should have been an increasing mortality in 2020, and in subsequent years (i.e. above normal compared to pre-2020, but not really an excess if standardized for age). This is important for understanding total excess, whether claiming it’s from ‘Covid,’ vaccination, or anything else. It does not, however, account for rising mortality in younger age groups, or the rate of death at any age.
The other obvious problem with Covid numbers is that, as the authors note, people generally only die once. Thus,
Cumulative excess deaths [were] much lower than the 212,247 officially considered ‘Covid’. Many covid would have died anyway [already old and very sick], or were not Covid deaths. The cumulative excess…are much lower than the total deaths recorded with Covid (212,247 with Covid mentioned on the death certificate by the end of 2022, according to the UK government’s data dashboard). There are a number of mechanisms that are likely to account for this. An obvious one is the fact that only some 17 thousand people had only Covid and nothing else recorded on their death certificate.
That was 212,247 with Covid on a death certificate – only 17,000 had Covid only. But official figures frequently imply that all 212,247 died because of Covid. Covid mortality events do not simply add to the mortality caused by the other comorbidities. The viral infection, like other viral infections, often simply hastens the deaths of very sick and dying people.
The equivalent figures for the UK in 2020 was a life expectancy drop of about 1 year and a life loss of about 6 days per head.
This is really important to understand. So, people who died of/with Covid lost, on average, a year of life. But the vast majority of the population did not die. So, only 6 days were lost on average across the entire UK population.
This raises a problem that governments and public health officials knew well before imposing lockdowns – the known impact of poverty and inequality on life expectancy. To quantify, well-accepted UK data from Marmott et al (2020) show a 5-year gap between life expectancy of the upper decile (rich) and lower decile (poorest) people in the country. Covid caused, in comparison, a 6-day reduction in life expectancy (averaged across the whole population). It is therefore almost inconceivable that an intervention that greatly increases poverty could be less harmful than Covid, from a public health viewpoint.
Modeling
The paper points out the really basic flaws in modeling by Imperial College London and others in supposedly predicting Covid-19 impact. These models drove many governments’ responses, though it was clear at the time, and the modelers would have known, that the models were designed to exaggerate harms. In particular, they failed to adjust for population heterogeneity, which tends to slow spread and reduce harms (the most vulnerable leave the population, leaving a more resilient populace). Failure to account for heterogeneity will overestimate future transmission by design.
Perhaps the most surprising feature of the epidemic models used to justify Covid policy was the omission of the fundamental role of person-to-person transmission rate heterogeneity investigated by Novozhilov (2008)
They also ignored the fact that close to half of early infections were hospital-acquired (China, Northern Italy) rather than from the community, leading to falsely high community transmission rates being fed into the models.
The Imperial modeling group, one should remember, was the same group that published in the Lancet in March 2020, showing almost no mortality in young and middle-aged people (second graphic above). They knew, when they pretended that very high mortality was expected, that the true picture was very different.
UK predictions were consequently far above reality – as were predictions of lockdown impact. Lockdown models assumed reproductive rate (R0) would be constant before or after lockdowns without intervention, whereas in reality it always varies with time, steadily declining from an initial peak as fewer people remain susceptible to being infected per case, as more of the population is immune. Again, this is really, really basic outbreak modeling. Consistent failures (e.g. non-lockdown Sweden having about 6,000 deaths instead of 35,000) failed to stimulate any modification and rectification of these basic errors.
While the actual impact of lockdowns on poverty and economic health is clear, controversy does remain on their impact on Covid transmission and mortality. Wood and co-authors address this by noting that nearly all lockdowns started after transmission had already started declining (see figure). It almost looks as if lockdowns were imposed at a time that would make them look effective, rather than with the expectation that they would avert more infections.
Time to stop pretending.
While Covid started over 5 years ago, people want to move on, and there are myriad papers arguing one side or the other. However, the paper of Wood and co-authors does stand out. It does not push any advocacy baggage or speculate on political motives, but simply lays out numbers and facts. From the point of view of the pandemic industry, it provides a really strong argument for censoring facts and hammering dogma. When laid bare by maths and statistics rather than sponsored modeling, the Covid response looks horribly like incompetence that was not completely unintentional.
Perhaps the modelers whose numbers justified Covid hysteria simply did what they were paid for and did not expect politicians and media to take them seriously. Perhaps public health physicians promoting long-term poverty and inequality were just trying to keep their careers on track and mortgages financed.
Perhaps politicians are just resigned to a reality that they must represent corporate sponsors before their constituencies in order to survive. Perhaps we are just not as smart, virtuous, and moral as we like to pretend that we are. Whatever the underlying issues, it is time everyone stopped pretending the Covid response was anything but a mess, or that we did not know it would be. There is still a place for truth.
David Bell David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. David is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA.
Floodgates Open for COVID Injection Lawsuit ft. Dr. Joseph Sansone | Daily Pulse Ep 110 [38:55] Maria Zeee
September 19, 2025 ZeeeMedia
Dr. Joseph Sansone joins us to discuss the HUGE floodgate that has been opened by Dr. Joseph Ladapo’s recent public admission that Covid shots are “poison.” Dr. Sansone explains how has now successfully formed part of his efforts to get these shots off the market, once and for all.
[Ed.: humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org
Spike and disease [13:10] Dr. John Campbell
Sep 20, 2025 – Premiere: Inside mRNA Vaccines
NEW STUDY: Cell Phone Radiation at 20× Below Legal Limit Induced Brain Damage in Rats NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
Infant rats exposed to “safe” cell phone radiation levels suffered impaired neuronal development and disrupted brain chemistry, while parallel in-vitro tests showed DNA damage in neural stem cells.
SEP 20, 2025
A new peer-reviewed study in Neurotoxicology has found that everyday cell phone–level radiation, 20 times below the US legal safety limit, disrupted brain development in infant rats and caused DNA damage in neural stem cells.
Researchers exposed pregnant rats and their offspring to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation — a standard cell phone band — at the public whole-body safety limit of 0.08 W/kg, the threshold recommended by international regulators (ICNIRP).
For context, US regulators (FCC) allow cell phones to emit up to 1.6 W/kg as a localized dose near the head — twenty times higher than the level used in this study.
Even at this tiny fraction of the legal maximum, the young rats showed clear signs of brain injury and cellular stress — including fewer proliferating brain cells, reduced synapse formation, and disrupted brain chemistry:
Fewer Brain Cells and Synapses
Rat pups exposed before and after birth had fewer proliferating brain cells in the hippocampus and cortex, along with reduced synapse formation and altered excitatory/inhibitory balance during key developmental stages.
Disrupted Brain Chemistry
Levels of BDNF — a protein essential for learning and memory — dropped in exposed animals. The shift in synapse balance toward inhibition is consistent with patterns linked to cognitive impairment and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Altered Brain Cell Fate
Stem cells in culture became less likely to form neurons and more likely to differentiate into glial cells (astrocytes, oligodendrocyte precursors), pointing to a long-lasting shift in brain cell development.
DNA Damage and Cell Death
Neural stem cells exposed at the “public safety limit” of 0.08 W/kg developed DNA double-strand breaks, increased apoptosis (cell death), and stress-driven over-proliferation.
Oxidative Stress Not a Major Driver
The study measured oxidative stress markers in rat brains but did not find significant changes, suggesting the main damage pathways involved DNA integrity and altered cell differentiation, rather than oxidative stress alone.
All of these effects were observed at 0.08 W/kg — the ICNIRP “public safety” threshold for whole-body exposure. By comparison, US cell phones are allowed to emit up to 1.6 W/kg at the head (localized exposure), a level 20× higher than what caused damage in this study.
These experimental data help explain why Setia et al found that high wireless EMF exposure more than triples the risk of neurodevelopmental delays in human infants.
NEW STUDY: High Wireless EMF Exposure More Than Triples Risk of Neurodevelopmental Delays in Infants NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
·AUG 15 Read full story
One thing is clear: EMFs are not harmless. The fact that they are invisible to the eye does not mean they are without effect. Evidence indicates that developing infants are especially vulnerable, experiencing the most adverse outcomes from EMF exposure. Whenever possible, daily exposure should be minimized.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation www.mcculloughfnd.org
They’re Poisoning Our Kids With Aluminum in Vaccines Part 3 [52:41]
September 20, 2025 Children’s Health Defense
Prioritizing health in America is long overdue, considering that advocates have been calling for reform for decades. Ken Stoller, M.D. is back on “Pediatric Perspectives” to provide his thoughts on how past efforts are converging with the present MAHA agenda and pointing towards a hopeful future — as long as people are put over profits and the industry and those who regulate it chooses transparency, truth and accountability rather than deception, lies and unreliability.
Comments
Comments are closed.