Daily Shmutz | GEOENGINEERING WEATHER / ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’   | 10/28/2023

GEOENGINEERING WEATHER / ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’  

THE DIMMING,   [1:56:50]  the most comprehensive climate engineering documentary

 

Engineering the Sky – The Great Climate Change Lie   By Lynne Balzer

Oct. 29, 2023 10:30 am – An article entitled “A Stratospheric Gamble” by Douglas Fox published in Scientific American on Oct. 1, 2023, describes the ongoing discussion and testing of the idea of shooting small particles of various chemicals into the stratosphere to reflect solar radiation, in the hopes of cooling the earth to combat global warming.

The article begins, “Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops.”

When Mount Pinatubo erupted in 1991, it ejected about 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere, slightly cooling the planet for a couple of years. Douglas Fox states that if sulfur dioxide were injected on a large enough scale – releasing perhaps one-fourth of that amount – one to two percent less sunlight would reach Earth’s surface.

Getting the sulfur dioxide high enough in the stratosphere to accomplish this goal is itself a challenge. No plane existing today can fly at that altitude, given the scarcity of molecules needed for lift. But scientists advocating for this operation believe that the B-47 Stratojet could possibly be modified within 7–10 years. To accomplish this task an entire fleet of these planes would have to be built. The projected cost of this operation is $18 billion per year for every degree of cooling produced. And this operation would have to be repeated every two years.

Although such an operation, dubbed Solar Radiation Management (SRM) would supposedly cost less than directly removing CO2 from the atmosphere, the article’s author claims that the fuel needed to send this fleet of planes that high could increase the entire expenditure of Earth’s energy as much as 25%. This seems highly unlikely. But it would take a lot of energy. And, of course, burning jet fuel produces carbon dioxide.

Strangely, these scientists may never have considered the fact that sulfur dioxide, reacting with water, produces sulfuric acid (H2SO4), which could remain in the atmosphere for as long as three years. This is acid rain! It was never mentioned in the article.

Another possibility that’s been suggested is to spray sea salt about 1000 meters high in order to seed clouds. Silver iodide could be used to seed cirrus clouds at an altitude of about 4500 – 9000 meters. Sarah Doherty, a climate scientist at the University of Washington, believes that a combination of methods used selectively would minimize possible risks.

This isn’t the first time that people have tried to influence climate. In 1962 a military project dubbed Storm Fury sprayed silver iodide particles into hurricanes in an effort to weaken them. During the Vietnam war Operation Popeye sprayed lead and powdered silver iodide into monsoon clouds to increase rainfall over the Ho Chi Minh trail, hoping to make it so muddy that the Vietcong would have a difficult time traversing it.

For decades studies using computer models have investigated the effect of various aerosols to determine which chemicals would be best to use and the ideal places to release them. The problem is that climate is very complicated, and climate science is still in its infancy. Not enough is known about the possible disruptions they might cause that could be far worse than any effect global warming has had.

 

Hurricane Manipulation Target Acapulco?  [51:45]   Dane Wigington |  GeoengineeringWatch.org

Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, October 28, 2023, #429

October 28, 2023 – From engineered weather to engineered insects, we are now paying the price for interfering with nature. “CDC Warns Tropical Flesh-Eating Parasite Is Now Endemic In Texas”, are genetically modified sand flies the source? From CNN news, “Hurricane Otis Devastates Acapulco”. From FOX news, this headline, “Acapulco has been destroyed”. Scientific American is telling us that the catastrophic category 5 hurricane that inflicted mass destruction to Acapulco, “came out of nowhere”, but is that the truth? The so called climate science community apparently doesn’t have any clue about how this could happen. What was predicted to be only a tropical storm suddenly became a devastating category 5 hurricane that delivered a direct hit on Acapulco. This self declared ignorance from the so called experts also applies to their ongoing denial of the shockingly obvious climate engineering operations taking place in our skies. For the record, the US military has been developing technology to manipulate hurricanes for over 76 years starting with Project Cirrus in 1947 and later Project Stormfury in 1962. Welcome to the world of weather and biological warfare.

Total Page Visits: 264
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.