NEWS
Over 20,000 Federal Workers Have Already Accepted Trump’s Buyout Offer — Still Way Below Target
Ukrainian President Zelensky Demands the West Provide Ukraine with Nuclear Weapons (VIDEO)
[Ed.: But he doesn’t know where the $177 Billion is...]
[Ed.: Aww! Poor little FBI Agents! Wrinkling their DEI panties…
FBI Turns Over Names of 5,000 EMPLOYEES Who Worked on J6 Cases
Trump’s EPA Housecleaning Begins: 1,000 Bureaucrats Get Termination Notices Through Email
[Ed.:
Liberals and Globalists Panic as Surging Right-Wingers Vie for Control of the European Union
[Ed.:
Before Leaving Power, Biden Regime Quietly Funneled $3 Mil to ‘Palestinian’ Government ‘Security Forces’ for Weapons, Training—After Its Members Carried Out Attacks on Israelis By Geller Report Staff
February 4, 2025 – Force for evil. The Biden Administration was absolutely despicable. And Antony Blinken was the worst and most immoral SOS in American history. Call your member of Congress and demand that all U.S aid to the Palestinian Authority is stopped. Designate the Palestinian Authority as a non-state sponsor of terrorism.
“Palestinian Authority Security Forces (PASF) members conducted more than 1,500 terror attacks against Israel in 2023—attacks that came with the Palestinian government’s backing
Biden Admin Quietly Funneled $3 Mil to Palestinian Government ‘Security Forces’ for Weapons Training—After Its Members Carried Out Attacks on Israelis By The Washington Examiner, Feb 3th, 2025
Trump admin ‘must conduct rigorous oversight of this type of funding, which the Biden administration quietly noticed at the 11th hour,’ says Rep. McCaul
The Biden administration, weeks before leaving power, funneled more than $3 million in taxpayer cash to the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (PASF), according to a nonpublic notice transmitted to Congress that was reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon. Those funds allowed the PASF to conduct “firearms and ammunition” training—and came after its members carried out scores of attacks against Israelis.
Trump Will Watch FILM of Hamas Oct. 7 Atrocities Before Meeting Netanyahu By Pamela Geller
February 3, 2025 – Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff saw the footage while in Israel last week and was left shocked, and decided that the president should view it as well.
This will change everything.
By Lazar Berman, Times of Israel, February 3, 2025;
US President Donald Trump will watch a documentary of Hamas October 7 atrocities before meeting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, says the Ynet news outlet.
According to the report, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff saw the footage while in Israel last week and was left shocked, and decided that the president should view it as well.
The 47-minute IDF compilation of footage from Hamas’s October 7 onslaught, which saw some 3,000 terrorists burst across the border into Israel to kill some 1,200 people and seize 251 hostages, mostly civilians, amid acts of brutality and sexual assault, will be shortened to 20-30 minutes for the US president, Ynet reports.
The footage, first screened for foreign journalists in Israel on October 23, 2023, includes harrowing scenes of murder, torture and decapitation from the Hamas slaughter in southern Israel, including raw videos from the terrorists’ bodycams.
More from today’s Liveblog:
Days after her release from Gaza, Agam Berger attends IDF ceremony for her sister Bar
Trump pauses new tariffs after Mexico agrees to reinforce border with 10,000 troops to stop drug smuggling
Cousin of Scottish student killed in 2002 Tel Aviv attack decries release of terrorist who drove suicide bomber
It’s not (only) about you.
Supporting The Times of Israel isn’t a transaction for an online service, like subscribing to Netflix. The ToI Community is for people like you who care about a common good: ensuring that balanced, responsible coverage of Israel continues to be available to millions across the world, for free.
[Ed.: Here is the video:
SCREAMS BEFORE SILENCE Full Video [57:00] A documentary film on the sexual violence committed by Hamas on October 7th, Screams Before Silence is a documentary film led by American businesswoman Sheryl Sandberg, that explores the sexual violence by Hamas during the Hamas-led attack on Israel, on 7 October 2023, including events at the massacre at the Nova Festival and abductions to the Gaza Strip.
Trump Demands Ukraine to Give Rare Earth Minerals to U.S. as Payment for Billions in Aid
Law Professor Jonathan Turley Says it’s Time to Shut Down the Taxpayer Funded ‘Gravy Train’ for NPR
Mexican Authorities Arrest Cartel Boss “El Ricky” After Trump Tariffs Force Mexico to Secure Border
BEYOND PARODY: Scotland Considering Banning Ownership of Cats as Pets in Order to Save Birds
[Ed.: ]
[Ed.:
– $1.5M to advance DEI in Serbia’s workplaces
– $70K for production of a DEI musical in Ireland
– $47K for a transgender opera in Columbia
– $32K for a transgender comic book in Peru
HERE WE GO: Names of FBI Officials Who Worked on January 6 Cases and Trump Investigations Identified
BREAKING: Mexican President Agrees to Work With Trump to Close Border One Day After Tariffs Imposed
[Ed.: A rhetorical question…]
Report: Panicked FBI Agents Are Planning a Protest Monday at DC Headquarters
Ed.: Buttigieg’s finally gonna get his butti kicked... 
]
[Ed.:
[Ed.: Democrats think that they can afford to embarrass themselves further!
Lawlessness – Anti-ICE Protestors Block Major Portions of Los Angeles Freeway (VIDEO)
[Ed.:
Senator Lindsey Graham Says He’s Voting Yes on RFK Jr., Kash Patel, and Tulsi Gabbard
DEVELOPING: FAA Forced to Use Backup System After Main Warning System For Pilots Experiences Outage
Calm Before the Storm: Will John Brennan Be First Criminal Deep Stater Arrested?
New York Teen Murdered by Her Pakistani Father in ‘Honor Killing’: Police
BREAKING: President Trump Officially Imposes Tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China
NY Hotels Using Illegals to Bilk Taxpayers Hit With Whopping Monetary Judgment
Trump’s DOJ Investigates Schumer’s Threats to SCOTUS After Assassination Attempt
FEB 01, 2025 @AMUSE – On March 4, 2020, a single, incendiary speech on the steps of the Supreme Court set into motion a chain of events that now demands accountability at the highest levels of government. Trump’s Acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin’s recent target letter to Senator Chuck Schumer, alerting him to the DOJ’s investigation into that very address of incitement, has laid bare a reckless disregard for the sanctity of our judicial system. The issue is urgent and pressing: a senator’s words, delivered with the venom of a demagogue, have not only incited an enraged mob but have now led to a sustained assault on the core institutions that uphold our republic.
On that fateful day in early March, Senator Schumer, standing before the venerable edifice of our Supreme Court, unleashed a tirade aimed directly at Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. With rhetoric that left little to the imagination, he declared,
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
Such words, teetering on the brink of inciting imminent violence, were not mere hyperbole. They bore the unmistakable hallmarks of a call to arms—a directive to unleash chaos against those who dare uphold constitutional restraint against progressive excess.
Chief Justice John Roberts swiftly condemned the senator’s remarks, understanding full well the peril inherent in a public official wielding threats as a weapon against the judiciary. Yet, Schumer’s response was as cold as it was defiant; his refusal to apologize signaled a disturbing indifference to the potential consequences of his incitement. In the eyes of a radicalized left, his words were a clarion call—a mandate that energized a movement intent on subverting the rule of law. That incendiary rhetoric morphed into a tangible assault on judicial integrity when, on May 2, 2022, a far-left Supreme Court clerk, likely inspired by Schumer’s call to arms, breached the sacred walls of court confidentiality by leaking the draft opinion of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to the press. This act of treachery, cloaked in the language of whistleblowing, was in fact a deliberate stratagem of intimidation and coercion, designed to terrorize conservative justices and undermine the very fabric of judicial independence.
The fallout was immediate and terrifying. Violent mobs, emboldened by a mixture of ideological fervor and lawless zeal, descended upon the homes of conservative justices, flagrantly violating federal law. Notwithstanding the explicit prohibition enshrined in 18 U.S.C. § 1507— which criminalizes the picketing or parading outside a judge’s residence with the intent to influence a decision—the Biden administration, far from enforcing the statute, chose an abdication of duty that effectively made conservative judges targets. This deliberate inaction sent a chilling message: that those who dared to uphold the Constitution were fair game for harassment, if not outright violence.
As the embers of Schumer’s incendiary words smoldered, the situation escalated to near-catastrophic proportions. On June 8, 2022, the connection between words and deeds crystallized when Nicholas Roske, a left-wing extremist, was apprehended outside Justice Kavanaugh’s home. Armed with lethal intent and a cache of weapons, Roske’s actions were a direct manifestation of the storm Schumer had summoned. His confession—that his motive lay in the draft Dobbs decision leaked a mere month earlier—renders a damning portrait of the consequences of inflammatory political rhetoric. It is no hyperbole to assert that Schumer’s words acted as the spark that ignited this blaze of domestic terrorism.
Even as the threat became palpably real, the Biden administration and congressional Democrats showed an alarming reluctance to act decisively. Rather than bolstering security for Supreme Court justices—a move that would have sent a firm message of protection for our constitutional guardians—they instead allowed the situation to fester. Their inaction was not born of bureaucratic incompetence but of a calculated willingness to let fear and chaos rule. By neglecting to safeguard the lives of those charged with upholding our laws, they effectively tacitly endorsed a campaign of terror aimed at dismantling the independence of the judiciary.
Senator Schumer’s culpability in this unfolding drama is as clear as it is damning. His words, delivered with unmistakable intent to provoke, rise to the level of incitement under federal law. They are a direct challenge to the rule of law and, as such, demand prosecution under statutes designed to deter exactly this kind of dangerous rhetoric. Under 18 U.S.C. § 373, his conduct qualifies as solicitation to commit a violent crime—a statute meant to shield our institutions from precisely such reckless provocations. Furthermore, by issuing these threats in the presence of an enraged crowd, Schumer’s actions constitute an obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, as they sought to undermine the independence of our judicial process. The application of 18 U.S.C. § 115, concerning threats against federal officials, further underscores the gravity of his actions—a legal precedent that has historically been applied to those whose transgressions, though far less egregious, nevertheless endangered the fabric of American governance. Lastly, his rhetoric, intended to incite disorder and violence, squarely falls within the ambit of the Anti-Riot Act—a statute whose purpose is to prevent exactly the kind of lawlessness that has now spilled into the streets and neighborhoods of our highest courts.
History offers us ample precedent for holding public officials to account when their actions stray into the realm of criminality. Senators such as Robert Menendez, indicted for bribery and corruption, and Ted Stevens, served as a stern reminder of the consequences of political malfeasance, have both faced legal repercussions for undermining the public trust. Schumer, with his reckless and incendiary words, has similarly betrayed the sacred trust placed in his office. His actions have not only flouted the principles of responsible governance but have also endangered the lives of the very individuals tasked with interpreting the Constitution.
This matter demands prompt and decisive action. No public official, regardless of rank or political affiliation, should ever be considered above the law. The DOJ’s investigation, now thrust into the spotlight by Acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin’s pointed target letter, is not merely a bureaucratic exercise—it is a vindication of the principle that in America, every citizen, even those in positions of power, must be held accountable for inciting violence and subverting our democratic institutions.
In the grand tradition of American statesmanship, where even the mightiest are subject to the law, it is imperative that Senator Schumer be held responsible for his actions. His inflammatory rhetoric, which clearly served as a catalyst for violence against the judiciary, has set a dangerous precedent that threatens the very foundation of our republic. The rule of law must prevail, and those who seek to undermine it with incendiary rhetoric and blatant incitement must face the full weight of justice. The warning from Acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin is a clarion call to all who value the integrity of our judicial system: there are consequences for those who dare to threaten the pillars of American democracy.
Let this moment be a reminder—a reminder that our democracy is not a playground for ideological warfare, but a fortress built on the enduring principles of justice, liberty, and the rule of law. Schumer’s whirlwind of incitement may have been ignited by words, but the flames it has unleashed now demand a reckoning. The law is not a tool for political expediency; it is the bulwark that guards the sanctity of our constitutional republic. In holding Schumer accountable, we reaffirm the unassailable truth that no one, not even a senator, stands above the law.
Insane Close-Up Video of Philadelphia Crash Appears to Catch ‘Allahu Akbar’ at Moment of Impact
Don Jr: If Dad’s Opening Guantanamo for Illegals, Why Not Alcatraz, Too?
France: Patriots take to the streets chanting ‘Islam out of Europe!’ BY ROBERT SPENCER
French patriots take to the streets chanting “Islam out of Europe!”
JAN 31, 2025 11:00 AM – This isn’t just happening in Britain, it isn’t just happening in Germany. It’s happening across Europe. We’ve had enough.
This ain’t over, and even when it’s over, it’s not over. If Islam conquers France and all of Europe, then comes the resistance.
Trump Triples Down on Gazan Resettlement ADAM LEHRER AND PARK MACDOUGALD
JAN 31, 2025 The Scroll – For the third time in a week, President Donald Trump on Thursday afternoon reiterated his demand that Egypt and Jordan accept refugees from Gaza. Here was his exchange with a reporter:
Reporter: The president [of Egypt] and the king of Jordan have both said that they won’t take in displaced people from Gaza like you suggested. Is there anything you can do to make them do that? I mean, tariffs against those countries, for example?
Trump: They will do it. They will do it.
Reporter: What makes you say that?
Trump: They’re gonna do it, okay? We do a lot for them, and they’re gonna do it.
Trump’s remarks—his most forceful yet on the subject—came one day after Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi said that the “displacement of Palestinians” can “never be tolerated or allowed because of its impact on Egyptian national security.” And the comments might have made Sisi nervous. On Friday, Reuters reported, “thousands of people demonstrated at the Rafah border crossing” in a “rare state-sanctioned protest.” According to Egyptian security sources, “Parties close to Sisi had sent buses to ferry protesters to the border crossing, where civilian movement is typically restricted, but said the outpouring expressed public and not just leadership disapproval of Trump’s proposal.”
Such outpourings of organic popular sentiment aside, Trump is correct that “we do a lot for them.” Not to mention that, as Jonathan Schanzer and Mariam Wahba explain in a Friday article in Newsweek, Egypt has not been on its best behavior in recent years. For one thing, Israel’s seizure of the Philadelphi Corridor last year exposed Cairo as deeply complicit in the smuggling of weapons into Gaza prior to Oct. 7. And Egypt appears to be getting into the habit of snubbing Washington, per Schanzer and Wahba:
In 2023, leaked intelligence revealed Egypt’s secret plans to supply rockets to Russia in flagrant defiance of U.S. policy. In October 2024, at the height of Gaza ceasefire negotiations, Sisi skipped a key meeting with then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken to attend the BRICS summit in Russia, further testing Washington’s resolve. Meanwhile, Egypt has deepened ties with China, acquiring Chinese fighter jets and allowing anti-American, pro-Chinese Communist Party propaganda to seep into state institutions. Trump, who values loyalty, may see Cairo’s obvious hedging as a betrayal.
Egypt, of course, is terrified of allowing refugees from the Muslim Brotherhood-run enclave onto its territory, and it did, as Schanzer and Wahba note, reportedly reject an offer of $250 billion from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in exchange for allowing Gazan refugees into the Sinai. But as Judith Miller reported for Tablet in May, Egypt was narrowly saved from economic disaster in 2024 by a combined $50 billion cash infusion from an International Monetary Fund loan, European Union grants and loans, and a massive real-estate development deal financed by the UAE—all secured thanks to pressure from the Biden administration, which decided, as the Egyptian analyst Ahmed Aboudouh put it to Miller, that Egypt was “too big to fail.”
Trump may or may not share that view, but the point is that he has considerable leverage over Cairo—to say nothing of Jordan, which is almost entirely dependent on the United States for its security. The Israelis, meanwhile, might want to consider listening to Trump rather than Steve Witkoff. Opportunities like this one don’t come along every day.
[Ed.: The FAFO-in-chief has a deal they can’t refuse. Capiche?
Pentagon removes major media outlets, including NBC News, from dedicated workstations in new ‘rotation program’ By Amanda Terkel
NBC News, The New York Times, NPR and Politico must vacate their office spaces in two weeks for other news organizations — including at least one that did not request to be added.
Feb. 1, 2025, 12:41 PM EST NBC News – (WASHINGTON) The Department of Defense announced Friday night that it will institute a new “annual media rotation program” for its in-house press corps, effectively removing several major news outlets, including NBC News, from their Pentagon office spaces in favor of other outlets.
In addition to NBC News, The New York Times, National Public Radio and Politico must vacate their dedicated workspaces. The news organizations learned about the new directive in a memo sent to the press corps without being individually notified, and an accompanying email included a message that read, in part, “no additional information will be provided at this time.”
“For over a half-century, the Pentagon Press Corps has benefited from working out of individual office spaces that provide coveted and open access to some of the Department’s top military and civilian leaders,” read the memo Pentagon spokesperson John Ullyot sent to the Pentagon Press Association.
“In order to broaden access to the limited space of the Correspondents’ Corridor to outlets that have not previously enjoyed the privilege and journalist value of working from physical office space in the Pentagon, beginning February 14, 2025,” Ullyot wrote, there will be “a new Annual Media Rotation Program for those dedicated media spaces.”
In a statement, NBC News said, “We’re disappointed by the decision to deny us access to a broadcasting booth at the Pentagon that we’ve used for many decades. Despite the significant obstacles this presents to our ability to gather and report news in the national public interest, we will continue to report with the same integrity and rigor NBC News always has.”
The move by Pentagon officials comes seven days after the Senate confirmed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth by the narrowest of margins. It followed weeks of coverage about his behavior and treatment of women, including allegations that his alcohol consumption alarmed colleagues and his second wife feared for her safety around him. Hegseth has denied the allegations.
NBC News reported on some of the allegations against Hegseth.
The memo identified the rotating organizations by medium — selecting one each from TV, print, radio and online news to swap in and out. It said the news organizations rotating out had two weeks to vacate their spaces.
The new outlets rotating in are One America News Network — which will take NBC News’s spot — the New York Post, Breitbart News Network and HuffPost.
Three of the new outlets are conservative, while HuffPost leans progressive.
HuffPost does not have a Pentagon correspondent, and the site did not request a space, spokesperson Lizzie Grams said.
“If the Trump administration and Secretary Hegseth are interested in more hard-hitting coverage of their stewardship of the Defense Department from HuffPost, we are ready to deliver,” Grams said.
“This decision interferes with the ability of millions of Americans to directly hear from Pentagon leadership, and with NPR’s public interest mission to serve Americans who turn to our network of local public media stations in all 50 states,” NPR said in a statement. “NPR will continue to report with vigor and integrity on the transformation this Administration has promised to deliver. NPR urges the Pentagon to expand the offices available to press within the building so that all outlets covering the Pentagon receive equal access.”
A One America News spokesperson said in a statement that the news outlet has operated a bureau in Washington since 2013, and it “looks forward to having access to physical office space at the Pentagon and will utilize the accommodations full-time as soon as it’s available.”
NBC News reached out to the other news outlets for comment.
The memo did not include further details about the process of the new “rotation program,” including how officials chose which outlets needed to vacate office space first, how the new outlets were chosen and which are next, and how long an outlet would remain without an office space before it was rotated back into the building.
NBC News has held its dedicated Pentagon workspace for decades, enabling the network to broadcast its journalism throughout the day and within minutes of breaking news. The “booth,” as they are called, is hardwired with technical equipment, phone lines and a camera installed by NBC.
It is unclear whether NBC News will have the technical capability to broadcast from the Pentagon once it clears out its equipment from its workspace.
Ullyot noted that the vacating outlets continue to be members of the Pentagon press corps, meaning, in part, they “will be able to attend and cover briefings and be considered for travel with civilian and military leaders in the Department as they have previously.”
The Pentagon Press Association on Friday evening issued a statement saying, “Our resident press corps has greatly expanded over the years and we have always welcomed new members and will continue to do so.”
“We are, however, greatly troubled by this unprecedented move by DOD to single out highly professional media who have covered the Pentagon for decades, under both Republican and Democratic administrations,” the statement read. “We have asked for a meeting and we will keep everyone informed.”
At her first press briefing this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that President Donald Trump’s administration was “opening up the briefing room to new media voices.” The first people she called on were Mike Allen of Axios — a longtime political journalist at a site considered mainstream — and Matt Boyle of Breitbart, a conservative site. Leavitt also said her team was working “diligently to restore the press passes of the 440 journalists whose passes were wrongly revoked by the previous administration.”
[Ed.: No more of their “News”...]
Orange Glow Appears on Horizon in North Carolina – Is the Biden Admin to Blame?
[Ed.: Let’s just call it ‘Land-grabbing For Lithium’. Get the people out (even if you have to kill them,) claim the land, and own the lithium!]
