NEWS
20,000 IRS Employees Accept President Trump’s Offer to Resign
[Ed.: That’s nice! What about all the ammo and artillery? Are the rest of them still armed to the teeth? Are there any arrests possible? Could all the ammo and artillery be returned to the taxpaying licensed gun owners who paid for it? (etc.) 
]
[Ed.: Oh, great, we get two more weeks of this creep!]
[Ed.:
Fitchburg Five Father Isael Rivera tells his side of the story, as he heads back to court 4/15/2025 [5:30]
Apr 15, 2025 FITCHBURG
Fitchburg Five Father Isael Rivera tells his side of the story.
Removed by a Rubber Stamp —the five Rivera children were taken by Massachusetts Department of Children and Families (DCF)—as their parents were taken away in handcuffs by 15 Texas State Troopers.
A magistrate rubber stamped a “care and custody” order that triggered the interstate manhunt that tore the family apart.
The Riveras were pursued across state lines like fugitives and hauled away in handcuffs like criminals in front of their terrified children, for declining first a shot for their nine-month-old baby, and then subsequent “services” from DCF after a pediatrician filed a 51A complaint with the agency for “neglect” of the otherwise healthy infant.
[Ed.: Theoretically, that’s ‘conspiracy!]
BREAKING: Top Hegseth Advisor Escorted Out of Pentagon For Leaking
[Ed.: You will have the ‘bad boys’…
[Ed.: Yes, Dan, significant arrests are not visible. Where are the arrests?]
Harvard Loses $2.2 Billion After Rejecting Federal Antisemitism Reforms
April 15, 2025 Jewish Breaking News – Harvard University suffered a major financial blow Monday when the Trump administration froze $2.2 billion in federal grants after the school refused to implement crucial policy reforms aimed at combating campus antisemitism.
“President Trump is working to Make Higher Education Great Again by ending unchecked anti-Semitism and ensuring federal taxpayer dollars do not fund Harvard’s support of dangerous racial discrimination or racially motivated violence,” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields explained. “Harvard or any institution that wishes to violate Title VI is, by law, not eligible for federal funding.”
Harvard has come under fire for straying from its educational mission toward anti-Israel “activism,” particularly as campus protests have created hostile environments for Jewish students following Hamas’ massacre against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
Federal officials had sent Harvard a clear ultimatum outlining changes necessary to maintain financial relationship with the government, including eliminating controversial DEI programs, banning masks at protests, implementing merit-based hiring, and reducing the influence of anti-Israel faculty.
But Harvard President Alan M. Garber defiantly rejected the administration’s demands, calling it an “overreach into academic freedoms.”
“We have informed the administration through our legal counsel that we will not accept their proposed agreement. The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” Garber stated.
“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government. It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI,” he said. “No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”
Harvard professors have since filed a lawsuit seeking an emergency restraining order against the funding cuts. Despite Harvard’s $53.2 billion endowment giving it financial cushion, taxpayers can at least be assured their dollars won’t fund institutions that refuse to address discrimination against Jewish students.
Columbia University recently faced similar consequences, losing $400 million in federal funding before agreeing to implement common-sense reforms including banning masked pro-Hamas demonstrations on campus. Princeton University may be next, as numerous federal agencies review its grants.
EU Reverses Course and Is Now Willing to Renegotiate Trade Deal with US
[Ed.: They changed their mind...]
WATCH: ICE Arrests Columbia’s Pro-Hamas Leader Mohsen Mahdawi at His USA Citizenship Interview
April 15, 2025 Jewish Breaking News – In a move applauded by those demanding accountability, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested Mohsen Mahdawi today. Mahdawi was the radical co-president of Columbia University’s Palestinian Student Union—during his U.S. citizenship interview.
Mahdawi now faces deportation back to Judea and Samaria, or what he calls “The West Bank, putting an end to his campaign of campus extremism carried out under the protection of a U.S. visa.
Mahdawi rose to prominence as a lead instigator in Columbia’s anti-Israel protests, described by many Jewish students as intimidating, threatening, and overtly antisemitic. He was a close ally of fellow agitator Mahmoud Khalil, another pro-Hamas activist who was recently detained by ICE as a national security threat. The two were frequently seen together organizing demonstrations and spreading propaganda that allegedly glorified Hamas.
After Khalil’s arrest, Mahdawi reportedly went into hiding and even pleaded with Columbia University officials to shield him from law enforcement. The university refused. On Monday, federal agents apprehended him.
Appearing in 60 Minutes Season 56, Episode 12, Mahdawi admitted he felt excited watching footage of Hamas terrorists entering Israeli homes, murdering civilians, and kidnapping hostages during the October 7 massacre. Rather than express horror at the atrocities, he said his concern was not for the innocent victims—but that Israel might carry out “revenge,” a clear indication that he viewed defensive military response as the problem, not the terror attack itself.
For many, his remarks confirmed suspicions that Mahdawi wasn’t a peaceful student activist, but a brazen apologist for terrorism.
Progressive lawmakers like Senator Bernie Sanders rushed to his defense, calling the arrest “immoral.” But many Americans see it as a long-overdue stand against campus hate.
“America is not a safe haven for those who celebrate terrorism,” said Marco Rubio. “If you praise the massacre of civilians and fear justice more than terrorism itself, you have no place here—let alone the right to get a student visa or become a citizen.”
Massachusetts Has Gone Full Commie—And If We Don’t Stop It, Every State Will Follow By Maureen Steele
April 12, 2025 We The People 2 – They took a baby.
They took his four siblings, too.
Then they took his mother and father away in handcuffs, amidst their wailing cries.
Not because he was abused. Not because he was neglected. But because his mother and father refused a shot.
And not just any shot—a pharmaceutical injection they have every legal and constitutional right to refuse.
This happened in Massachusetts, once the cradle of liberty, now the epicenter of a recurring state-sanctioned nightmare. And if you think this can’t or won’t happen in your state—you’re not paying attention.
The parents—Ruth Encarnacion and Israel Rivera—were hunted down like fugitives, jailed, and forcibly separated from their five children, including a nine-month-old baby who was breastfeeding at the time. Why? Because they said “no” to a pediatrician who, like a pharmaceutical soldier for the state, gave them an ultimatum: inject the baby now or I file a 51A report.
And file he did.
That one decision—a threat disguised as medical advice—unleashed the entire corrupt machinery of state force. With the help of a coward in a robe—Magistrate Brendan Moran of Worcester County—DCF was handed sweeping custody of all five children without a hearing, without notice, and without service.
All of this is a violation of due process, parental rights, and human decency.
But let’s call it what it really is: judicially sanctioned state kidnapping.
It’s happening all over this country, but Massachusetts has gone full commie. The state believes it owns your children. They believe parental rights are conditional. And worst of all? The judiciary enables it.
These magistrates aren’t applying the Constitution. They’re applying corporate policies and agency paperwork with the blind obedience of a mid-level manager at some Soviet DMV. Moran didn’t even hold a hearing. He simply rubber-stamped DCF’s paperwork and greenlit the seizure of five children—property of their parents under the law—with zero evidence.
Zero.
This is precisely the kind of corruption the Chevron deference once empowered. And it was finally struck down in July of 2024 by the Supreme Court. No longer can agencies interpret law or act as judge, jury, and executioner. Yet that’s exactly what DCF is doing—and the courts are illegally going along with it.
The police? Just as guilty. They’re not neutral parties. They didn’t question the paperwork or demand a warrant. They simply followed orders—illegal orders—and carried out an unconstitutional, warrantless seizure of American citizens. The same goes for the sheriffs, the federal marshals, and the police who surrounded the peaceful family as if they were holding their children at knifepoint.
The fact is, there was no imminent danger to the children at any time. None. The Fitchburg police, who initiated the interstate manhunt, admitted as much in their own flyer, stating that an Amber Alert was not necessary.
Let me be clear: participating in the deprivation of rights under color of law is a federal crime under 18 U.S. Code § 242.
So yes, the officers involved committed crimes. They are criminals. So is Magistrate Moran. So is DCF. So is Dr. Behzad Goharfar, the Iran-trained pediatrician who triggered this raid. These people have destroyed a family for no reason other than that the family refused to kneel.
And this isn’t just about one case. This is a symptom of a broken system—a judiciary drunk on power and insulated by a self-serving, BAR-controlled network of lawyers, magistrates, and agencies that speak a language the people were never taught: legalese.
They created their own rules. Their own dirty little sandbox. And they demand you play by it.
But what if we just said no?
No, we will not comply with unlawful orders.
No, we will not play in your rigged courtroom game.
No, we will not let you use a badge and robe as cover for tyranny.
We don’t need another Act of Congress. We don’t need more legislation. We need the Constitution. Period. It is the supreme law of the land, and everything we need to rein in this corrupt system is already written within its pages.
The more we let legislators pile on bureaucracy and meaningless “reform,” the further we stray from the simplicity and clarity of our founding documents.
Here’s the truth they don’t want you to know: the Constitution is a sword, not a suggestion. It doesn’t request compliance—it demands it. And when those in power violate it, they forfeit their legitimacy.
The time for letters and softly worded appeals is over.
We need citizens outside Brendan Moran’s house—every day, 24/7.
We need thousands descending on the Massachusetts State House.
We need to audit oaths of office (spoiler alert, this criminal in a back robe doesn’t have a proper one), demand removals, and start filing federal civil rights lawsuits en masse.
And if oversight boards won’t hold them accountable? Then it’s up to the people.
History has shown us how this ends. Every time tyranny has taken root—be it British monarchy, Jim Crow courts, or Soviet-style bureaucracy—it has only been overturned when the people stood up and refused to comply.
We are at that moment again.
Massachusetts is the test case. If they get away with this, it will spread like a cancer—state by state, child by child, until no parent can say “no” to anything without risking state retaliation.
So we say this to magistrate Moran, to DCF, to the BAR, to the complicit police officers: your days of hiding behind badges and black robes are over. The people are coming. And we’re bringing the Constitution with us.
We don’t ask for permission to be free.
We just are.
How to help!
Educate yourself on how to instruct your public servants.
(Common Law Academy)
Read these words and sign this notice and seconds or fax or mail.
[Ed.: That’s very special, Kash! But what about the real arrests of Obama, Clinton, Fauci, and all the treasonists of the Deep State who have actively faught against this country all these years? Where are the real arrests, Kash?]
Sweden’s Civilizational Shift: Number of Mosques Surge 4,200% in 25 Years
Trump Administration Fast-Tracks Controversial Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccine for H5N1 Bird Flu
[Ed.: Another “Operation Warp-speed”! Trump hasn’t learned a thing after the first time! Over 50 million people have died… Do read the comments to this post!]
How is it that the Biden Administration spent $1 BILLION on furniture during COVID
LIVE: Trump LIVE: Trump on Missing Gold Reserves At Fort Knox; Elon Musk’s DOGE to Inspect | CPAC
400 Tons of Gold Reserve Missing?
[Ed.: This LIVE broadcast rambles on and on and on with no time marker, and you never get to hear about the missing gold alluded to in the title. Better not to waste time on it (unless you’re a Trump junkie!) I wanted to hear: where are the arrests? And where is the gold? But nada, zilch.]
DOJ Fires Longtime Spokesman Who Worked for Deep State Operatives Robert Mueller and Jack Smith
[Ed.: The Left are now masters of reversal:
[Ed.:
THIS IS BIG: Rudy Giuliani Criticizes Kash Patel and Pam Bondi: ‘I’m Very Upset Right Now’
Service Members Separated for Rejecting COVID Vaccine Can Be Reinstated, But There’s a Big Catch That Has Many Refusing By Ole Braatelien
April 12, 2025 The Western Journal – Service members separated for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine can now re-enlist, but the Department of Defense requires them to do the impossible first.
During a press briefing Tuesday, Tim Dill — the acting deputy undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness — outlined the plan for reinstating service members separated during the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate of August 2021, according to a news release from the DoD.
The secretary of defense rescinded the mandate in 2023, but by then, 8,700 service members had already lost their careers.
In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reinstating said service members.
“Former service members … are now receiving letters of apology from the department in the mail, along with instructions on how they can pursue returning to service,” Dill said at the news conference.
Those who were involuntarily separated would receive back pay, while those who “voluntarily” separated would not, Dill said. Both, however, would be reinstated with the same rank and pay as when they left.
They will have until April 1, 2026, to express interest, according to the DoD release.
Since Trump’s order, the various military branches have started reaching out to separated service members.
But there’s a catch.
Former members of the Air National Guard, Air Force, and Space Force must first sign a form acknowledging that they “voluntarily separated” or allowed their service to lapse, and that their “decision to separate was made freely and without coercion,” Just the News reported.
It’s a requirement outlined in Trump’s Executive Order, which reads:
“Allow any service members who provide a written and sworn attestation that they voluntarily left the service or allowed their service to lapse according to appropriate procedures, rather than be vaccinated under the vaccine mandate, to return to service with no impact on their service status, rank, or pay.”
R. Davis Younts, a lawyer representing veterans affected by the mandate, told Just the News that some of his clients wouldn’t take the deal.
“I talked to several clients who were forced out,” Younts said. They “have no interest in signing the document,” but would otherwise “gladly come back in. They don’t care much about back pay, but they are not going to sign a false statement just to come back in.”
“If I have clients who I believe have a legitimate claim to rectify an error in justice that occurred — like they should’ve been promoted but weren’t, or were not allowed to reenlist over the vaccine because of an injunction pending– I’d have a hard time advising them to sign it,” since “they’re waiving a lot, saying they left voluntarily, and waiving the opportunity to be compensated for the loss of promotion and backpay,” Younts said.
Younts fears the form acknowledgement is meant to deliberately sabotage returning veterans.
“I’m optimistic that senior leadership and officials that I talked to at the Pentagon understand and are sympathetic to these concerns and want to address them, but I’m seeing a level of malicious compliance in an attempt to stop, slow roll, or make an effort to make reinstatement meaningless for most people impacted by COVID,” Younts said.
[Ed.:
[Ed.: That’s nice, but where are the arrests?]
China Raises Tariffs on U.S. Goods to 125% In Largely Symbolic Move By Pamela Geller
April 11, 2025 – China further isolates itself…..
“China faces simultaneous crises: a stumbling economy, closing export markets, plunging property prices, failing local governments, accelerating capital flight, and continuing debt defaults. And Xi Jinping’s response has been to double down on policies that caused these problems in the first place.”
“Many export-oriented factories in China will now close. I don’t see how they adjust to the sudden loss of almost all the U.S. market without massive government intervention, which is unlikely.”
Story continues below advertisement
“China’s increase in the tariff rate from 84% to 125% looks largely symbolic because the 84% rate and informal actions of the Chinese government were already shutting off the Chinese market to U.S. goods.”(Gordon Chang)
“https://twitter.com/GordonGChang/status/1910646572909572193
CNBC:
- China has retaliated against the U.S. President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs by raising its levies on U.S. goods to 125% from 84%, the finance ministry said.
- Trump administration confirmed to CNBC on Thursday that the U.S. tariff rate on Chinese imports now effectively totals 145%.
- China on Friday retaliated against U.S. President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs by raising its levies on U.S. goods to 125% from 84%, the Chinese finance ministry said.
“Even if the U.S. continues to impose higher tariffs, it will no longer make economic sense and will become a joke in the history of world economy,” the ministry said in a statement, according to a CNBC translation.
“With tariff rates at the current level, there is no longer a market for U.S. goods imported into China,” the statement noted, adding that “if the U.S. government continues to increase tariffs on China, Beijing will ignore.”
The Trump administration confirmed to CNBC on Thursday that the U.S. tariff rate on Chinese imports now effectively totals 145%. Trump’s latest executive order boosted reciprocal tariffs on Beijing to 125%, stacked on top of a combined 20% fentanyl-related tariff imposed in February and March.
[Ed.:
[Ed.:
Debased Democrats Cheer MS13 Gangbanger’s Return to US Soil (Video)
