NEWS

DEVELOPING: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Kicked Off House Floor by Sergeant at Arms
President Trump Goes There, Says Whoever Used Biden’s Autopen “Usurped the Power of the Presidency”
[Ed.:

[Ed.: “…stuck a feather in his cap, and called it macaroni!”]

JUST IN: Trump Admin Pauses All Student Visa Interviews, Will Expand Social Media Vetting
What happened to Elon Musk’s call to audit Fort Knox? (VIDEO)
They’re Losing Their Own Voters to Trump: Latest Polls Take Surprising Turn for Dem Voters
This Will Break Your Heart: Tina Peters Sends Message to President Trump on Memorial Day
Jewish Dems Prefer ‘Squad’ AOC to Schumer for Party Leader, Shocking New Poll Finds
May 26, 2025 Jewish Breaking News – Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, long considered the most powerful Jewish elected official in America, is hemorrhaging support among his core constituency as a fierce critic of Israel emerges as his most potent political threat.
A new poll released this week shows “Squad” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez leading Schumer by 21 points among likely Democratic voters in New York, 54% to 33%, in a hypothetical 2028 Senate primary matchup. More striking still, the progressive congresswoman who has called Israel’s Gaza operations “genocide” leads the Jewish senator 45% to 33% among Jewish Democrats themselves.
“This is a massive wake-up call for Schumer,” said Maury Litwack, co-founder of the Jewish Voters Action Network, which commissioned the Honan Strategy Group poll. “He’s not only bleeding support in the Democratic Party overall but also in the Jewish community.”
Now, with his favorability underwater at 39% favorable to 49% unfavorable statewide, the 74-year-old finds himself politically vulnerable to a Democratic Socialist who belongs to an organization that vocally supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.
For Schumer, who has built his 50-year career on strong Jewish voter support and positioned himself as Israel’s chief defender in the Senate, his downfall began in March when he faced intense backlash from his own party for advancing a Republican-crafted government funding bill without extracting concessions.
Democratic colleagues were so infuriated that some began privately encouraging Ocasio-Cortez to challenge him in 2028, according to sources who spoke with CNN at the time.
“House Democrats are so mad that even centrist Democrats were ready to write checks for AOC for Senate,” one Democratic member told CNN. “I’ve never seen people so mad.”
Meanwhile, Schumer’s criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Senate floor, calling for new elections just months after Hamas lauched its deadly massacre on Oct. 7 2023 left a bad taste for many of his supporters. It didn’t help matters either when as Senate Leader he failed to pass the Antisemitism Awareness Act while Democrats controlled both chambers and the White House, and for allegedly advising Columbia University to ignore antisemitism accusations, a claim Schumer vehemently denies.
“The leading Jewish elected official in the nation did not step up in a moment of rising antisemitism, and the poll reflects that,” says Litwack.
The timing is particularly awkward for Schumer, who just authored a book about antisemitism.
Ocasio-Cortez, by contrast, has seen her stock rise dramatically. At 35, she now boasts a +69 favorability rating among Democrats nationally, the highest of any Democrat who hasn’t run for president or vice president, according to recent YouGov polling. She’s been drawing massive crowds alongside fellow Israeli critic Bernie Sanders on their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour, including over 30,000 attendees in a Trump-won California district last month.
For Schumer, the challenge isn’t just political positioning either. It’s generational. At 77 by the time of the 2028 election, he would face a candidate 42 years his junior at a time when Democrats are increasingly wary of older leadership. Ocasio-Cortez’s ability to mobilize younger voters and progressive energy could prove formidable, some analysts suggest.
However, Litwack believes that the poll results likely reflect more dissatisfaction with Schumer than enthusiasm for Ocasio-Cortez specifically. Still, with nearly four years until the election, the numbers provide a stark warning for a senator who has never faced a serious primary challenge.
So far, AOC has declined to comment on the speculation of a potential Senate run, telling reporters she remains focused on her House duties.
[Ed.: It’s really too bad that in Judaism we have no excommunication like the Catholics…]
[Ed.:

J6er Ryan Samsel Fights to Regain His Health After His Release-How You Can Help
JUST IN: FBI Reopens Investigation Into Cocaine Found at Biden White House
[Ed.: There are advantages to be married to Macron…
British Man Arrested for Saying to Jihadis in London: “G-d Bless Israel, G-d bless Jewish People!” [VIDEOS] By Pamela Geller
May 25, 2025 – A British man was arrested for saying to a group of jihadis in London: “God bless Israel! God bless Jewish people!”
The UK has been taken over by Islam.
The UK is finished. There is little left of merry ole England. It’s a de facto Islamic state living under sharia law.
BREAKING: Iranian Uprising PARALYSES Islamic Occupation [12:34] Mahyar Tousi
May 25, 2025 Tousi TV
[Ed.: Zelensky just attacked Putin personally while in his helicopter with a drone swarm, and now Trump is criticizing Putin? This doesn’t add up. Something is definitely not as it appears to be here! If I were Putin, Zalensky would have been toast already!

GOP Senator Ron Johnson Says He Has The Votes to Stop The One Big Beautiful Bill (VIDEO)
Cell Tower Removed After 4th Ripon Student Diagnosed with Cancer
MARCH 25, 2019 Physicians For Safe Technology
After 4 students and 3 teachers were diagnosed with cancer within a 3-year period, Sprint finally removed a cell tower at a Ripon, California school. While it is exceedingly difficult to identify the cause of a cancer cluster, parents and students in the San Joaquin County school are convinced there is one and it is caused by the campus cell tower. They are not only protesting but several have abandoned the small school which now features 4 rare cancers in students -2 brain tumors, one kidney cancer and one liver cancer. Investigations of not only cell tower radiation but also water quality have been initiated. After 200 parents stormed the school board meeting, school officials were prompted to ask for the cell tower to be removed at the K-8 school. Sprint has agreed to do so.
Parents Opposed the Cell Tower Before it was Placed
The cell tower was placed at Weston Elementary School 10 years ago and a group of parents opposed the cell tower construction before it was erected, citing health concerns. According to news reports, they have another 15 years left on the 25-year lease with a rental fee of about $2,000 per month paid to the school. A GO PETITION to have the cell tower removed was initiated in 2017 after 2 children in the school developed cancer.
Radiofrequency Levels Are Within FCC Guidelines
Officials have maintained that the radiofrequency radiation levels were below the federal standard when measured and they are in compliance. Questions remain about the safety of cell towers, as well as the current standards, which many experts state are not protective of human or environmental health. Current FCC regulations for human exposure are based on heating of tissues and short term exposures, not harmful biological effects demonstrated at much lower levels in the scientific literature. The FCC reevaluation standards were successfully challenged in 2021 in a DC court but no action has been taken. In addition the European Parliamentary Assembly called for precaution and reduction of RFR, especially for children, in 2011 with passage of Resolution 1815.
Even though the cause of any particular cancer may never be determined is there scientific evidence that removing the cell tower and taking this precautionary approach is warranted?
Schools Average Radiation Levels Rather Than Considering Peaks
Schools such as those in New Zealand and Los Angeles have measured RF radiation and stay the levels are far below government guidelines, however, they average the RF levels, and have not considered peak “modulated” spiked pulsations, which are the most biologically harmful. Consider that a peak pulse can be like a bullet piercing a cell membrane. The duration may be short but the tissue injury is great and lasting. These long term effects of constant pulsed (modulated) radio frequency radiation on brain cells, our reproductive systems and metabolism have not been considered and averaging veils the true harm.
LAUSD Radiofrequency Evaluation Reports: Office of Environmental Health and Safety. All Reports. Use of Wireless Devices in Education all Settings- They state the levels are 10,000 lower than limits (averaged) here.
Is Cell Tower Radiation a Toxin?
Cell towers as well as Wi-Fi create continuous emissions of pulsed microwave radiation. Microwave ovens which use similar radiofrequencies at higher power cook by heat, however, at lower power adverse biological effects have been demonstrated in scientific studies without heating or burning the tissue. One mechanism of toxicity that has been clearly shown is oxidative damage, seen in 93 of 100 scientific studies (Yakymenko 2016). Oxidation is a common mechanism of toxicity found in pollutants such as pesticides, industrial chemicals, cigarette smoke and heavy metals. These pollutants can trigger inflammation and damage to cell structures such as DNA, mutations of which can be a precursor to cancer.
Wireless radiation passes through and is absorbed in the body and organs and thus, like chemical toxins which are ingested, inhaled or absorbed through the skin, they can potentially cause broad harm to cellular structures and internal organs. Damage from RFR is cumulative, as it is with ionizing radiation and other toxic exposures. The longer the exposure the more harm. Toxic exposures can act separately or in combination synergistically to cause illness or cancer (co-carcinogenesis). Effects are non-linear and due to individual variation in genetics, nutrition and health.
Cell Towers and Cancer
In 2011, the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) listed radiofrequency radiation (RFR) as a Class 2B Possible Carcinogen. Scientists have argued that considering the current level of published research on brain tumors and radio frequency radiation that RFR should be listed as a Class 1 Known Carcinogen. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study on Cancer and Cell Phones announced their findings in 2018, after 10 years of research on RFR, and showed DNA damage (a precursor to cancer) and clear evidence of carcinogenicity of wireless radiation emissions. They demonstrated in carefully conducted studies a significant increase in tumors of internal organs including the heart, brain and adrenal medulla (which sits just above the kidney). Another worrisome finding from the NTP was the development of aging of the heart in the exposed cohort.
Cell Towers as a Co-Carcinogen
Scientific evidence indicates that exposure to multiple environmental pollutants, especially over time can increase the risk of diseases such as cancer. Some toxins exert their effects in certain windows of development. Some are tumor initiators and some can be tumor promoters. It is a complex area of scientific endeavor. Combined toxic exposures are unfortunately incompletely studied as it would take geologic time to examine the 80,000 plus chemicals in varying assortments along with radiofrequency radiation. Dr. Ross Adey concluded, however, in a 1990 review, that based on a new understanding of the biology of cancer at a cellular level and available studies, that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields “acting alone or in conjunction with chemicals that occur as environmental pollutants may constitute a health hazard”.
Considering at least one shared mechanism of toxicity between chemicals and RFR, cellular membrane effects and the many studies performed this should be, as Dr. Adey states, “a matter of urgency” in terms of research and public policy.
[Ed.:

[Ed.:

[Ed.: If he threatened the life of a President, maybe he could have received a 4-year sentence instead?]
White House Turns Press Room Over to Children and the Important Questions Actually Get Asked
President Trump Announces “Magnificent Parade” in DC to Celebrate 250th Anniversary of US Army
