NEWS
Dem-Appointed Judge Lets Convict Walk — He’s Now Accused of Kidnapping a Mom and Her Kids
Illinois Judge Denies AG Paxton’s Request to Enforce Arrest Warrants Against AWOL Texas Democrats
[Ed.:
[Ed.: Subway sandwiches are (so far) not protected under the Second Amendment. We must ban all Subway sandwiches and prevent future crimes! Just sayin’.]
Netanyahu Says If Israel Wanted Genocide in Gaza “It Would Have Taken Exactly One Afternoon”
Religious collapse in Spain: Vocations on the brink of extinction and the church in free fall.
[Ed.: Why has Europe forsaken its Judeo-Christian birthright?
[Ed.: They’re not really “protesters” and they’re not “protesting” anything. They’re just doing their job.
MSNBC Contributor Claims He’s More Afraid of Climate Change Than Crime in Washington, DC (VIDEO)
Crushing the Climate Conspiracy By Pamela Geller
August 12, 2025 – The Trump EPA is proposing the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States, by repealing the 2009 Obama EPA Endangerment Finding, all the GHG regulations on vehicles that followed, and the much despised start/stop feature.
In doing so, we will follow Supreme Court precedent set in cases like Loper Bright, West Virginia, and Michigan, we will claim no statutory authority beyond the plain language of the law, and we will heed the calls of Americans demanding relief from extreme economic pain.
“Twisted science”
“Legal overreach”
“A trillion-dollar tax on working Americans”
This Trump Proposal Will Reverse the EPA’s Climate Overreach
Revoking the agency’s Endangerment Finding will lift costly regulatory burdens and restore the Clean Air Act to Congress’s original intent.
By: Judge Glock, City Journal, August 05 2025:
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate change wasn’t on anyone’s mind. Yet under an Obama-era decision known as the “Endangerment Finding,” the Environmental Protection Agency has claimed authority under the act to micromanage large parts of the American economy in the name of combating global warming.
A new Trump administration proposal to reverse the Endangerment Finding returns the Clean Air Act to its original purpose, marking the end of a failed effort to control the climate through executive fiat
The Endangerment Finding stemmed from the 2007 Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA, which required the EPA to determine whether carbon dioxide qualified as a dangerous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. In dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts warned that the decision “ignores the complexities” of addressing global warming through the statute—but suggested its effects “may be more symbolic than anything else.” He couldn’t have been more wrong.
In his first year in office, President Obama recognized the limits of the Clean Air Act and sought to push a bipartisan climate bill through Congress. But when lawmakers failed to act on his terms, he turned to executive authority. In 2009, in response to Massachusetts, the EPA declared that six greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, endangered public health and welfare and therefore required regulation.
Unfortunately, the structure of the Clean Air Act is not conducive to regulating CO2. This is partly because the act is designed to regulate industry. Yet CO2 is not just emitted by factories and cars but by every human, frog, parakeet, and muskrat, among other animals. The act required federal permits for any source that emitted more than 100 tons per year of an air pollutant. By this measure, some families would need permits just for breathing.
Even the EPA realized that the law could sweep up hundreds of thousands of stores, apartments, hotels, and small establishments. As an act of regulatory noblesse oblige, the agency said that it would regulate only sites emitting more than 100,000 tons of CO2—a number it picked out of thin air.
The EPA’s attempts to use the act to regulate emissions unleashed endless litigation. In 2014, the Supreme Court overturned the 100,000-ton permit standard, which two justices called “patently unreasonable.” In 2022, in West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court said that the EPA’s mandate to shut down a substantial part of the nation’s coal-fired power plants and substitute them with gas and renewables also couldn’t be squared with the act.
One sticking point was that the Clean Air Act focused on regulating emissions through technological additions to cars and factories, such as smokestack scrubbers. But, unlike other pollutants, there’s no easy way to stop greenhouse gases from coming out of the end of a smokestack. If you burn fossil fuels, the CO2 must go somewhere, and that generally means into the atmosphere. The only way to control most greenhouse gases is to mandate less use of energy derived from fossil fuels. Such mandates were never the purpose or intention of the act.
Often absurd actions resulted. Cars and trucks are some of the main emitters of CO2, and they were the focus of the original Endangerment Finding. But there are no catalytic converters or equivalent technologies to eliminate CO2 from gas-powered vehicles, so the EPA simply imposed stricter gas mileage standards. It did so despite Congress’s having already established a separate program within the Department of Transportation to regulate fuel economy.
The Biden administration went further, issuing rules under the Endangerment Finding that would require about two-thirds of new cars and trucks to be electric by 2032. This went beyond regulating mileage to reshaping the entire American automobile fleet. The estimated costs of the rules surpassed $1 trillion, making them among the most expensive regulatory actions in history. And because the government also offered separate subsidies for electric vehicle purchases, the regulations stood to add hundreds of billions of dollars to the deficit—again, without any congressional approval.
These regulatory contortions reveal the folly of using questionable statutory language, rather than clear congressional action, to make major decisions that reshape American society. Those who view climate change as an existential threat have a duty to persuade the public of that claim. If addressing climate change truly requires making sweeping changes to how we live, then advocates must build a broad-based coalition to pass laws mandating those changes, not bypass the democratic process through executive fiat.
Border Czar Tom Homan Slams Lies About DC Crime: “They Think We’re Idiots” (Video)
PANIC IN KIEV: Russian Forces Breach Ukrainian Defenses, Make a Major Breakthrough in Donetsk Region
Texas Senate Officially PASSES New Congressional Map — Democrats STORM OUT in Protest (VIDEO)
[Ed.: “What does that mean?” Tee-hee!
Druze update in Syria with Julia [1:25:04] Mansur Ashkar
August 11, 2025
Hillary Clinton Lashes Out at Trump For Deploying National Guard in DC
[Ed.: Naughty, naughty!]
DEVELOPING: Three People Dead in Shooting at Target in Austin, Texas – Suspect in Custody
[Ed.: This has been happening somewhere every single day! One thing you can be on. Either he ‘s a Musloid doing it out of religious conviction, or he’s a psychiatric patient on psychotropic drugs. Any bets? We don’t have to ban guns, folks! We just ban psychiatry and psychiatrists (and all of their drugs.) (Oops, I forgot meth heads.) Just a few years ago, if you remember, these monsters were still doing lobotomies! Just keep the psychologists. See Dr. Peter Breggin (psychiatrist,) for further information: http://www.breggin.org/ ]
NEW: Supreme Court Asked to Overturn Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
President Trump Moves Obama and Bush Portraits Out of View to “Hidden Stairwell”
August 11, 2025 Yeshiva World News
Join a YWN Live Alerts Community for Live Breaking News Updates!
🚨 BREAKING: Tousi TV Reporter Taken To Hospital After Attack In London [41:20] Mahyar Tousi
August 10, 2025 Tousi TV
Iranian President Pezeshkian: “We have no water. We are in a severe and unimaginable crisis.
August 10, 2025 Jewish Breaking News
If anyone has a suggestion of what to do, they should come and tell us what actions to take.
Unfortunately, we have no choice but to cut off water.”
🇺🇸 WHATSAPP GROUP 🔗 https://chat.whatsapp.com/CSjlWV8UnNxHukfKTrUBcD
🇮🇱 TELEGRAM 🔗 https://t.me/JewishBreakingNewsTelegram
🔥 WHATSAPP CHANNEL 🔗 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4EEJU7YSdAqzGs362F
New product called Savor is being marketed to restaurants, bakeries and food suppliers
AUG 10, 2025
We have an update in our ongoing coverage of the war on food.
A Bill Gates-backed startup is now producing butter with no animals, no plants, and no oils. It’s made exclusively from carbon.
It is being praised because it uses zero greenhouse gases and less than one-thousandth of the water compared to traditional farm-based agriculture.
They create a wax-like substance by ultra-heating carbon in a factory and then selling it to consumers as so-called butter.
The Melian Refugee blog described is as follows: “The idea that this is ‘healing the planet’ compared to cows in a field eating grass is so comically evil and perverse that only Bill Gates could be behind it.”
Gates clings to his dream of destroying American agriculture and replacing it with factory food that he stands to profit from.
Watch him, below, in a promotional video singing the praises of fake butter, trying to cast it as just as good as real butter. Other than Gates, notice it’s all women being used to push this product. In the marketing and advertising world, women are seen as less threatening, more convincing and trustworthy.
Poor Bill. He’s having to admit it’s “really hard” to put farmers out of business and convince people to eat his crappy non-food made in a lab. The dream is that you will buy all the lies from people like Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, Benjamin Netanyahu, etc., and start eating factory-made food that has no proven track record for human health. Lab-grown meat and fish have billions of dollars in venture capital backing, as the billionaires are betting big that real food will soon become more scarce, forcing people to look for more affordable alternatives.
If you buy it and consume it, you will become their human guinea pigs. What could possibly go wrong? Remember the Covid shots that Gates backed, saying they were safe and effective, when the dirty little secret was that we were the lab rats? Nearly five years later, people are still dying from that scheme, nobody has been held accountable, and the depopulationist elites are celebrating their accomplishments. I anticipate fake food bio-engineered in factories will deliver a similar “win” for the globalist elites. The joke is always on the little people.
It will be no different with fake buter. It may taste the same, but how will it affect your health over the long term?
The company, Savor, is working with restaurants, bakeries, and food suppliers to get their carbon-made butter onto the plates and into the bellies of Americans. By the end of the year you should start to see it showing up at your favorite grocery store, likely with very vague and deceptive labeling.
Another false solution to a false problem. I don’t believe I’ll be buying or consuming any fake butter, whether it has the blessing of Gates or anyone else
Caught on Camera: Syrian Forces Execute Doctor in Hospital in Al Suwayda [48:30] Mansur Ashkar
August 10, 2025
[Ed.:
Pelosi Is Just the Tip of the Democrats’ Insider Trading Iceberg
[Ed.: Tee-hee! What a coincidence!]
Sanctions of Tyrant Brazilian Justices Show Trump Is Wrestling Back Control of Western Hemisphere
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker Opens Door to 2028 Presidential Run — ‘Can’t Rule Anything Out’ (VIDEO)
[Ed.:
Nearly Half of Gen Z Say They Would Choose Financial Stability Over Love, Shocking Survey Reveals
[Ed.:
Counterterrorism and Special Ops Forces Deployed to Protect Ghislaine Maxwell’s Life in Texas Prison
UN Admits 95% of its Gaza Aid Trucks Were ‘Intercepted’ BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
After 5% success rate, UN demands another $265 million or everyone will starve.
AUG 9, 2025 3:00 PM Jihad Watch – Over the past few weeks, the UN, the EU, the media and Hamas banded together to demand that aid deliveries shift back from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to the United Nations.
The campaign played out with Hamas kidnapping, torturing and killing employees of the U.S. aid group, while the media spread false claims that Israel was using GHF distribution sites as ‘death traps’ for killing Gazans, and world leaders demanded that the UN be put back in charge of aid.
Back when the UN had been in charge it had faked its own famine by refusing to deliver food and letting it pile up instead. Since then the UN’s food aid has kept on piling up even while GHF, an American Christian aid group, has managed to deliver millions of meals to Gaza residents, despite being smeared by the media as “controversial” for feeding those whom the UN wouldn’t.
Whom was the UN actually delivering aid to back when it even bothered trying to deliver it?
The UNOPS ‘Mechanism for Gaza’ revealed that of the around 2,600 aid trucks entering Gaza, only 300 made it to their destination. 2,310 trucks or 88% of them were ‘intercepted’.
Much of the ‘aid’ being brought in by the UN and its allies, including the UN’s WFP, UNICEF, the International Red Cross, the International Medical Corps and the World Central Kitchen, whose founder Jose Andres, has been constantly attacking Israel in the media, was ‘intercepted’.
Cindy McCain’s UN World Food Programme (WFP), which has been front and center in the media, crying for more money and denouncing Trump and Israel, only successfully delivered 1,864 pallets of aid since May while losing 29,673 pallets or 93% of it to “interceptions”.
The UN’s WFP recently claimed that it has run out of food stocks and needs $265 million for just the next 6 months to feed Gaza. Where did its food stocks go? Certainly not to aid stations.
The WFP’s track record of successfully delivering pallets is 6%. That’s bad even for the UN. Who is all that aid going to? The UN, which is happy to break down everything by weight and pallet, is deliberately vague on the subject, saying only that it had been “intercepted either peacefully by hungry people or forcefully armed actors, during transit in Gaza”.
Who might those “armed actors” be? Alec Baldwin? Clint Eastwood? Hamas?
The UN, which condemns Israel every other day of the week, isn’t talking, but what we know is its aid groups aren’t actually delivering to any aid groups, they’re ‘delivering’ them to “armed actors” and those armed actors probably aren’t members of the Academy of Motion Pictures.
And the UN’s deliberate ambiguity about how many trucks are being “peacefully” intercepted and how many are being seized by “armed actors” with green headbands is likely a deliberate attempt to obfuscate how many of its ‘aid trucks’ are being used to run supplies to Hamas.
In a recent press release, the UN’s WFP claimed that “a total of 1,833 trucks have been dispatched to reach starving civilians inside Gaza”, it neglected to mention that only 140 of those trucks (currently estimated at 2095) or 5% of the trucks actually reached anyone.
Even assuming the best possible intentions by the WFP, why in the world would anyone hand the UN organization its requested quarter of a billion dollars for a 5% success ratio?
And there’s no reason to assume any good intentions on the part of the UN or the WFP.
After years of doing this, even a bunch of rickshaw drivers could manage a better ratio than 95% enemy intercepts. It’s hard to believe that the 5% deliveries to 95% interceptions ratio reflects anything other than extensive collaboration between the UN’s Gaza employees, many of whom are Hamas, and Hamas. The UN’s refusal to deliver much of the aid under its control reflects a deliberate effort to create shortages in order to put pressure on Israel and drive up the price for the aid that Hamas steals. There’s no famine in Gaza but there are artificial shortages being created by the UN-Hamas alliance meant to financially and politically benefit the terrorists.
The best evidence of it is that Hamas made the restoration of UN control over aid into Gaza one of its conditions for a deal. Why would an Islamic terrorist group care who distributes the aid?
After losing 95% of its aid trucks, you would think that the UN would turn to Israel to provide security, but unlike the Gaza Humanitarian foundation, the international aid groups have repeatedly rejected any Israeli military protection. Lately, UN officials have taken to complaining that their trucks are being looted because they’re forced to use “unsecured routes”.
But if they don’t want Israel to secure those routes, who do they want securing the routes?
According to a New York Times story, “the United Nations does not allow Israeli soldiers to protect aid convoys, fearing that would compromise its neutrality, and its officials have called on Israel to allow the Gaza police, which are under Hamas’s authority, to secure their convoys.”
Having Hamas escort its trucks doesn’t compromise the UN’s neutrality, but having Israel does.
Last year, Farhan Haq, the Deputy Spokesman for the UN Secretary-General, in response to a question about Israel taking out the Hamas ‘General’ in charge of the ‘Gaza Police’, and “responsible for securing the aid and the aid trucks” admitted that “we have contacts with everyone involved in the grounds who can play a role in making sure that trucks can travel safely through Gaza, and that includes people in the de facto authorities” and vowed that “we will continue our discussions with anyone on the de facto authorities who is capable of working with us to make sure that the flow of goods into Gaza continues.” “De facto authorities” are how nonprofit aid groups tend to refer to illegal Islamic terrorist groups. In this case, that’s Hamas.
The AFP reported that “the Gaza police – which includes many Hamas members – helped secure humanitarian convoys” while NBC News claimed that “Gaza’s police force was also more present and provided security, but months of Israeli bombing have crippled the police.”
The Biden administration, after falsely assuring Israel that Hamas would not intercept the aid, was not only aware that this was going on, but David Satterfield, Biden’s ‘humanitarian’ envoy, condemned Israel for taking out the Hamas ‘police’ including, according to him, “a commander whose units had been involved in providing escorts”, admitted that the Gaza ‘police’ “certainly include Hamas elements” but that “with the departure of police escorts, it has been virtually impossible for the U.N. or anyone else… to safely move assistance in Gaza.”
With Hamas helping to “secure” aid trucks, it’s a mystery how so many of them disappear.
After an aid delivery success ratio in the single digits, the UN is terrible at delivering aid in Gaza, but it’s a stunning success when it comes to its political and economic support of Hamas.
[Ed.: Uh-huh! “Give us more money, or else everyone will starve!” Uh-huh.]
Iran Threatens to Murder 45 Anti-Regime Journalists and Their Families BY HUGH FITZGERALD
AUG 9, 2025 4:00 PM Jihad Watch
The Islamic Republic of Iran has just issued a warning to Iranian dissidents working for the London-based Iran International, which broadcasts into Iran true stories about the country that the regime doesn’t want reported. It’s a murder threat: stop your reporting on Iran, or you and your relatives will be killed. As Iran’s economy sinks, truthful reports on the situation, which the regime wants kept hidden, are being made available to Iranians on social media and increasing political discontent. Tehran has one way to shut down those reports: it threatens to kill 45 of the journalists who work for Iran International, and 300 of their family members as well. More on these threats can be found here: “Iran threatens to execute 45 journalists, over 300 relatives in coordinated media suppresion [sic] effort,” Jerusalem Post, August 7, 2025:
The London-based media outlet Iran International has filed an urgent appeal to the United Nations, revealing that 45 of its journalists and more than 300 of their relatives across eight countries have received explicit death threats from Iran’s Intelligence Ministry.
The threats warn staff to stop reporting on Iran or face execution, including the execution of their immediate family members.
The Persian-language news network, headquartered in London with additional bureaus in Washington and other global locations, said the campaign is part of a coordinated effort by Iranian authorities to silence dissent and intimidate the press. The threats mark what Iran International calls an “alarming and unprecedented escalation” in Tehran’s long-running campaign against the outlet.
While the Iranian government has for years tried to shut down as best it can Iran International’s online reports, it has never before issued a threat of mass murder of its journalists. This is a new development, prompted by the collapse of Iran’s economy, which has made the grim reports from Iran International even more believable and effective.
In its formal appeal filed Tuesday with five UN special rapporteurs, Iran International’s legal team outlined that the threats have come with specific deadlines, all of which expired last week. The letter was sent to UN experts on freedom of expression, extrajudicial executions, torture, counterterrorism, and Iran.
No other totalitarian state has used the threat of mass murder of journalists, wherever they may be located around the world, in order to shut down truthful news about that state. Iran has gone beyond the Nazis and the Communists both in the geographic scope of its threats against journalists around the world, and in the size of the group being threatened — 45 journalists and 300 of their relatives.
The countries where these journalists are located include not only the U.K., where Iran International’s headquarters are located, but also the USA, Canada, Sweden, Germany, Turkey, and Belgium.
What should the Western world now do? All of the countries where Iran International journalists now live and are threatened should collectively charge Iran with threatening mass murder of those journalists, in the hope that the UN itself will urge the imposition of economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic, such as a call for countries to halt their buying of Iranian oil and natural gas. Iran’s own news outlets can be targeted for cyberattacks. Sanctions can be placed on Iranian officials, including freezing their assets abroad, and denying them visas to travel to other countries. These sanctions should remain in place until Iran withdraws the threats it has made to the employees of Iran International. And, of course, the Western countries could provide Iran International with much greater financial support so it can expand the numbers of its personnel and increase its online operations. That’s the best way to answer Iran’s threat.
Russians Warn ‘Titanic Efforts’ Are Underway to Disrupt the Trump-Putin Meeting in Alaska
Texas Democrats Are Raging Over GOP Gerrymandering—But They Did It First
[Ed.: ‘What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!’]
Trump Vows That DC Will Soon Be One of America’s ‘Safest Cities’
