COMMENTARY / OPINION
BREAKING: Netanyahu Signs Off On Gaza “Peace” Deal [1:22:12] Yishai Fleisher
September 30, 2025 – Yishai’s take on US President Trump’s 20 Point Gaza Ceasefire Plan with your questions and comments. Join us live from Judea, Israel now!
The Government Will Shutdown Tomorrow — And Play PERFECTLY Into President Trump’s Plan!
September 29, 2025 WLT Report
I love it when a plan comes together!
President Trump is about to get EXACTLY what he wanted, and Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are going to hand it to him on a silver platter!
It seems fairly certain at this point that the Government will indeed shut down tomorrow evening.
Here is VP Vance confirming that’s where we’re headed:
VP VANCE: “I think we’re headed to a [government] shutdown.” pic.twitter.com/Gz41x7JKl6
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) September 29, 2025
In the past, the party not in power would always want a shutdown because then they’d blame the party in power for all the Government workers who are not getting paid.
And Chuck Schumer thinks he’s just going to roll out that same plan here, but he doesn’t realize this time is different!
Think about it…
What has President Trump spent most of the past 9 months fighting to do?
He’s been up to the Supreme Court many times on the issue of who in Government he can and can’t fire.
He’s won most or all of those cases, but they’re taking a lot of time and a lot of effort.
What would be better?
Just shut the whole damn thing down and start over!
Clean house!
Wipe things clean and later on rebuild only the people and things you need.
And the cherry on top?
Of course Trump couldn’t do this on his own, Democrats would be outraged! So the cherry on top is to get Chuck Schumer to do it for him!
And Chuck is playing right into Trump’s hand — but hey, no one ever said this guy was smart:
They’re just like us! The so-called “Elites” are so normal and down to Earth…..they’re just like you and me! Sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little bit even thinking about that. 🤮 These people are nothing like us…
Mark it down, President Trump and Russ Vought are going to PERMANENTLY eliminate thousands of jobs out of the Government during this process:
If there is a govt “shutdown”, Trump has ordered Russ Vought to permanently eliminate jobs when funding lapses.
In past shutdowns, they just get a vacation and backpay a few days later (furlough). This time employees will be fired, eliminating thousands of govt union jobs. pic.twitter.com/bygL7UKYAg
— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) September 29, 2025
Stephen Miller confirms here:
JUST IN: The White House is planning for MASS LAYOFFS if the Democrats allow the government to shut down, according to Politico.
Politico: “The Office of Management and Budget move to permanently reduce the government workforce if there is a shutdown.”
“In the memo, OMB told… pic.twitter.com/zbbXQj13Pw
— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) September 25, 2025
Look at some of these beautiful numbers…
HHS – 41% of jobs could go!
CDC – could lose 64% of jobs!
NIH – 75% of jobs!
US GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TO SLASH HEALTH AGENCIES
41% of Health and Human Services staff, over 32,000 workers, will be furloughed if Congress fails to avoid a shutdown.
CDC will lose 64% of staff, crippling opioid, HIV, and diabetes prevention programs.
NIH faces a 75% cut,… pic.twitter.com/7JLepki0m0
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) September 29, 2025
It’s brilliant folks!
And I almost considered not publishing this article so I didn’t tip off Chuck Schumer but let’s be honest, he has no good options here and as I said he’s not smart enough to figure it out anyway!
Here was President Trump earlier today:
Under a new White House plan, potentially tens of thousands of federal employees could be laid off for good if there is no deal to fund the government before the deadline expires. @edokeefe reports. https://t.co/mWCenFh96J pic.twitter.com/yLwZd9a3S8
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) September 25, 2025
Speaker Thune fully explains:
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 29, 2025
TRANSCRIPT:
But their whole thing is, “It’s up to you.” That’s their message. Uh, what do you say to that?
Well, I- I don’t know where they come up with that because we are Republicans united, House Republicans, Senate Republicans, President Trump. The House Republicans have passed a short-term funding resolution that is clean, nonpartisan, and came over to the Senate. It’s sitting at the desk in the Senate. We could pick it up and pass it tonight. The president would sign it into law. The government stays open. It’s that simple.
And what they’re trying to do is create a, uh, counter-narrative that, uh, suggests that they can add trillions of dollars of spending, uh, free healthcare for illegals to this thing, and it’s just flat, you know, there, there, there’s just, there isn’t a, um, a world in which they’re being realistic. This is a totally unserious proposal.
You wrote an op-ed and you said, in fact, uh, the Democrats voted 13 times for clean funding bills while President Biden was in office. So what is the explanation, uh, why not this time to continue negotiating the appropriations bills?
Well, we, this is And that’s exactly what we wanna do, and I’ve made this very clear. You pass a short-term funding resolution that will enable us to finish the other appropriations bills through the normal regular process. So we wanna fund the government the way that it should be funded, which is through regular order. And that’s the appropriations committee marking up bills, reporting ’em to the floor, opening it up to the amendment process. That’s the way it used to work.
Um, in Chuck Schumer- Schumer’s universe, we didn’t do appropriations bills. It was all written behind closed doors in his office. And now he’s upset because he isn’t being consulted on everything because we’re doing things the way we should be doing ’em, allowing Republican senators and Democrat senators to work together to pass these bills. And what we need is to fund the government, give us some time to, to do the rest of the appropriations bills.
And if there are other issues they wanna talk about, one of which is this premium tax credit issue, we’re wel- you know, we welcome that conversation. But you can’t hold the federal government hostage. Release the hostage, and then we can start talking about these other things.
You know, Leader Jeffries said, um, in the Oval Office, there was a frank and direct discussion. In Washington, that translates to heated at times. Was it heated?
Well, I mean, I think it was, uh, it was-
Lively?
It was lively. It was spirited. And, um, you know, obviously they’re in a tough spot politically. And I, and I get it. I mean, they’ve got a base that is demanding that they fight anything related to President Trump. This, you know, you mentioned the 13 times they did this. When they, when they had the majority, the Democrats did, you had Joe Biden in the White House, passed 13 short-term continuing resolutions.
Well, what’s changed? Donald Trump’s the president. That’s what’s changed. But, you know, on the health issue, health providers could lose 32 billion if ACA credits at the center of the shutdown fight expire. The lapse in Obamacare subsidies could also lead to an additional 7.7 billion in unpaid medical bills for uninsured patients, from uninsured patients. Big deal, right? For a lot of people.
Well, the premium tax credit issue is something we’re willing to have a conversation about. But the fact of the matter is, it is rife with waste, fraud, and abuse. It needs reforms. It is a program where the government pays, makes direct payments to insurance companies. Insurance companies get subsidies to cover more people, so through their agents and brokers, they go out and auto enroll people, many of whom don’t even know they have coverage.
And of the 23 million people who were covered in the exchanges last year, 12 million never filed a claim ’cause a lot of ’em don’t even know they have coverage. And there’s no income caps on it. There’s a couple in West Virginia making $580,000 a year that’s getting subsidies from the federal government for their healthcare.
Um, there are, you know-
But you’re willing to work on this issue in particular?
Yeah, I mean, part of this is the, the base Obam- Obamacare program is not gonna be affected. What’s gonna be affected is the enhancements that the Democrats added when they had the majorities. So we’re-
What about-
But we’re willing to have that conversation. But you gotta do that in, you can’t do that in the context of a hostage-taking situation, which is where we are right now.
What about the OMB director’s letter, uh, Russ Vought, in which he asks the department heads or tells them there might be possible permanent layoffs, uh, saying, “Agencies are directed to use this opportunity to consider reduction in force notice for all employees that don’t fit under, uh, being funded by the funding that continues.”
Right. Well, and that’s, and that’s exactly why we oughta keep the government open.
So that’s a real threat?
Well, I mean, I think that Look, if you, you have to manage a shutdown. If you’re Russ Vought, you have to figure out in the middle of a shutdown, “What am I gonna do? How am I gonna shift money around?” It is the American people that get hurt by this. There is no reason for a government shutdown. Republicans are united, House Republicans, Senate Republicans, the president of United States, all agree to keep the government open.
All it takes is Chuck Schumer to agree to put the bill that’s sitting at the Senate desk. The House has passed it. We can pass it. President signs it into law. Government stays open.
You know, we saw this train coming down the tracks. I interviewed you in July and asked specifically about this. Take a listen. You’re gonna need Schumer’s support to keep the government open. We are.
And we, and we- And so how are you gonna get it?
Well, I mean, we, it, at some point, you hope that in the interest of the country, that they will work with us on issues like funding the government. But it’s been very hard because at least right now, they’re, anything that the president wants, they’re against. Said anything the president wants, they’re against. And we’re at this moment.
Are you in the same place?
Well, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about because it is. This is a clean, short-term, bipartisan funding resolution, something we did 13 times when the Democrats had the majority. And all we have to do is pick it up and pass it and then we can go to work on the other appropriations bills and the other things that Democrats want to address.
But they’ve tried to introduce, you know, a trillion dollars in new spending, free healthcare for illegals, uh, as part of their proposal. And we can’t do that by tomorrow night at midnight. And we’re not gonna do most of that stuff anyway. But if they wanna do something on premium tax credits, uh, we’re open to having that conversation.
Su- But you can’t do it in this context. Schumer is running scared from his political left. I mean, it’s that simple. And again, this is all about who’s in the White House. They did this 13 times when Biden was in the White House.
So chances right now, standing in the White House driveway, that the government shuts down, where do you put it?
Well, I mean, it’s up to them and, uh, I don’t know-
So above 50%.
Well, if the Democrats are coming out and saying flatly, um, “We will vote,” repeatedly, and they will have to because we won’t force ’em to vote ’cause the bill is sitting in the Senate to, to keep the government or to shut the government down, not to fund the government. It’s up to them. The ball is in their court and, um, this is-.
So the deal is now official and it is a Horrible Deal [Part 2] Avi Abelow
[5:36 AM, 9/30/2025] +972 52-451-9609 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel
Last night, I explained why the Trump-brokered Gaza deal is horrible, and I stand by that today. Based on long-term thinking, grounded in the reality of the conflict we are involved in against a 1,400+ year Islamic jihad ideology being assisted by the global progressive left, this is a bad deal.
This is not the way to fight evil, an evil that is in the successful process of destroying Western countries from within, because the war Israel is fighting against the Iranian-Qatari Islamic jihad was never just about destroying Israel, we are only the frontline…
Having made that clear, now I will provide my analysis on why we should still have a positive outlook moving forward.
Let’s first now break down why Netanyahu and his team signed off on this deal, even though it falls far short of what Israel needs. And this is knowing that Hamas might still reject it.
While I wish Netanyahu had fought for a much stronger outcome, the truth is: he’s the best realistic Prime Minister we’ve got right now, even though we need better. Any of the other party leaders would have totally capitulated and in a sense surrendered, endangering Israel tremendously. That’s just the reality.
Reason #1: The Deal Checks Off Israel’s Five Core Demands
– The return of all hostages.
– A demilitarized Gaza.
– No Hamas in control.
– No role for the Palestinian Authority.
– And most importantly: no Palestinian state.
If that’s truly enforced, then in theory, this deal aligns with Israeli government policy. But that’s a very big if.
Reason #2: Political Unity
By agreeing to a deal that ensures the return of all of our hostages, Netanyahu neutralizes a massive political weapon being used by the political opposition. The hostage issue has been politicized from day one, not to help the families, and free our hostages, but to topple the government. This deal takes that issue off the table and restores internal unity, at least temporarily.
Reason #3: Hamas Is Now Isolated – Globally and Regionally
Hamas is cornered. The Arab states, including Qatar, Turkey and Egypt, support this deal. If Hamas accepts, it disappears from Gaza. If it rejects the deal, it stands isolated and exposed. This is a strategic win for Israel, no doubt, but it’s still not enough because it’s only a short time win, as Qatar, Turkey and Egypt are all Muslim Brotherhood countries with the same exact genocidal Islamic ideology as Hamas, that the world still ignores. So, removing Hamas from Gaza does nothing to end the war aims of the Muslim Brotherhood countries to continue trying to destroy us.
Reason #4: The Bigger Picture – Iran and Hezbollah
Israel and the U.S. are both staring down the barrel of the next major confrontations, Iran and destroying Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon.
And when that time comes, and it’s coming soon, Trump & Netanyahu want Gaza on a low flame, not an all-consuming fire. This deal buys time. It clears the decks. It lets the IDF and government focus on the greater existential threats.
But, and this is where the real problem lies, this is all short-term thinking.
The Long-Term Reality Still Makes This a Horrible Deal
Even if Netanyahu checked off those five demands and even if he buys some tactical breathing room, this deal is fundamentally flawed. Why?
– Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood remain legitimized as a “partner for peace” while it continues to fund terror and poison the West from within.
– The core ideology of Islamic jihad, over 1,400 years old, is untouched, undeterred, and emboldened. No peace deal will ever change that.
– The narrative of a Palestinian state, a state built on terror, lies, and blood, is still lingering in the air, waiting to be revived by the West or our own weak leaders if the left return to power in Israel.
Netanyahu’s UN Speech: A Glimpse of the Real Strategy?
If you listened closely to Netanyahu’s speech at the UN on Friday, you might have heard something new: his first real attempt to destroy the Oslo paradigm.
He said out loud what we’ve all known:
– 90% of Arabs in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza supported the October 7th massacre.
– The Palestinian Authority is no different than Hamas.
– And there will never be a Palestinian state.
For Netanyahu to have said those things is huge. If that’s his new official doctrine, then this deal, bad as it is, shows that at least Netanyahu is finally diplomatically making the baby steps in the right direction, all while still acknowledging that this deal does little in achieving this new, positive, diplomatic direction, as it still doesn’t fix the fundamental errors.
Again, I’m a realist. I don’t believe in fantasy peace agreements. I don’t believe in moral equivalence. And I don’t believe in giving away our ancestral homeland, that God entrusted to us to get rid of evil, to terrorists in exchange for a very temporary quiet.
In the end, we will return to Gaza, not as occupiers, but as Jews reclaiming our land, and The genocidal Arab Muslim Gazans will emigrate to other places. That is inevitable. Because this is a forever battle against a demonic ideology that has no place in a civilized world and that is the only way Israel will be protected, by fulfilling our mission as the Jewish people in the land God gave us to root out evil in order to make holy.
Hold fast to your emunah. Stay clear-eyed. Even though this is a bad deal, we are still moving, slowly but surely, in the right direction.
We just have to make sure we don’t lose our way along the path.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
So the deal is now official and it is a Horrible Deal [Part 1] Avi Abelow
September 29, 2025 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel
I understand why some people are saying it’s the best deal Israel will get, and hence Israel is right to agree to it, and I understand why Netanyahu agreed to it, but make no mistake: this so‑called breakthrough, brokered by President Trump with Netanyahu and signed off by several Arab states, including Qatar, is a horrible deal, as it continues to set dangerous precedents not just for Israel, but also for America and the whole freedom-loving world.
Even if this is part of some 4D chess move of Trump’s, as Trump and Netanyahu tricked the world before the strike on Iran, and yes, we’re still clearly heading toward another inevitable round of fighting against the Islamic Republic of Iran and against Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon, it’s still a horrible deal.
Even if Hamas rejects it, the very terms on the table signal weakness, not strength. It legitimizes bad actors, empowers our enemies, and once again ignores the root causes of the conflict.
Classic Netanyahu: agree to a bad agreement betting our Islamonaz*i enemy will say “no.”
This agreement ignores the fundamental facts driving the conflict, and hence continues to kick the conflict down the road until the next round. It treats symptoms, not causes. It offers temporary calm while leaving in place the political and ideological structures that appeases our enemies and produce more terror, against all of us.
To our Islamonaz*i enemies, staying alive without losing land, allows them to feel victorious. , and empowers them to just plan the next round of terror against us.
Qatar’s role should make everyone uneasy. Qatar is the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization aimed at destroying the whole freedom-loving world, and also responsible for the Oct. 7th massacre against us.
President Trump forcing Netanyahu to apologize to Qatar without forcing Qatar to apologize to Israel is an absolute disgrace, and a stain upon the Trump administration.
Worse, the deal completely sidesteps the undeniable reality of the genocidal indoctrination taking place in UN-funded schools throughout Judea, Samaria, Gaza, and even Jerusalem, all funded by Western donor nations to the United Nations.
Having a group of Arab states take over Gaza does absolutely nothing to stop the 1,400+ year Islamic jihad ideology we are up against. It just puts a new face on the same threat.
To paper over those facts in exchange for a ceasefire is to seed the next round of conflict.
Equally dangerous is continuing to treat the Palestinian Authority as if it is different than Hamas, if “changes are made”. Netanyahu knows changes will never be made, and yet even the Trump administration is continuing the facade about its potential to lead a Palestinian state.
This agreement looks, in the worst light, like kicking the can down the road for a hostage release now. That is not “peace”. It is postponement plus normalization.
There’s only one deal worth making: President Trump pressuring Qatar to force Hamas into a full surrender, release all the hostages unconditionally, and begin implementing his Gaza emigration plan. Anything less is just more dangerous theater. That is the only way you deal with evil, to protect Israel and the world.
If Netanyahu is betting on rejection by Hamas as a political trap, that is a gamble with high stakes and uncertain payoff. We all count on Hamas saying no, but even so it is still a horrible deal. And If Hamas accepts, we risk legitimizing arrangements that will breed tomorrow’s terror. Either outcome demands clearer, tougher policies, not another morally bankrupt diplomacy.
We should be seeking an outcome that sends a clear message to the Muslim leaders behind the 1,400+ year Islamic jihad that endangers us all. They pay a steep price for killing us and trying to destroy Israel, and the West. Everything else is appeasement.
Do I think Hamas will agree to this deal? No. But, even so, this deal highlights the weakness of even the Trump administration.
This war will only end with our total victory and making Gaza Jewish again, because our enemies will never stop. That hard truth can no longer be ignored. Evil must be called out for being evil and stopped. Period.
Strengthen your faith in Hashem. That day will come, hopefully sooner than later.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
Trump’s peace plan for Gaza will fail miserably. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
Much of the West still clings to the fantasy that Islamists can be coaxed into moderation. But Islamists only see such gestures as weakness to be exploited.
SEP 29, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump’s new 21-point plan for Gaza is doomed to collapse under its own illusions — and not because of Trump himself, his policies, or even the United States.
The deeper issue lies in much of the West’s continuing failure to understand the ideological nature of its enemy. Islamist movements like Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood — and their patrons in Qatar and the Islamic Republic of Iran — do not see the world through the same lens as the West. They reject every value the West represents: democracy, pluralism, individual rights, compromise.
To negotiate with them is to negotiate with an ideology that does not recognize legitimacy outside of its own absolutist framework.
Much of the West still clings to the fantasy that Islamist factions can be coaxed into moderation with incentives, recognition, or international oversight. But Islamists only see such gestures as weakness to be exploited.
Even if Hamas were to agree to Trump’s plan, it would be nothing more than a tactical pause. History proves this. Longtime Palestinian leader and mega-terrorist Yasser Arafat signed peace agreements with Israel during the 1990s known as “the Oslo Accords.” He smiled for the cameras and shook hands with Israeli leaders. Yet, behind the scenes, he admitted the agreement was merely a step toward ultimate victory, invoking the Islamic principle of hudna — a temporary truce used to regroup, rearm, and prepare for the next round of conflict.
Arafat even went as far as to tell a Palestinian journalist:
“I am entering Palestine through the door of Oslo, despite all my reservations, in order to return the Palestine Liberation Organization and the resistance to it, and I promise you that you will see the Jews fleeing from Palestine like mice fleeing from a sinking ship. This will not happen in my lifetime, but it will happen in your lifetime.”1
Hamas thinks the same way. According to Hamas-economy expert Eyal Ofer, the terror group knows it cannot remain in power in Gaza formally in the short term, so it will tactically agree to expert committees and foreign oversight.
“They will say, ‘We will not act against the Arab forces that will enter,’” Ofer recently explained on Israeli radio, “but Hamas always thinks in the long term. They actually plan to take over within five to ten years.”
Western policymakers who speak of Hamas “disappearing” are utterly disconnected from reality.
This is because the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not really about land, borders, or liberation. It is about ideology: Islamism. This is the same ideology that has driven countless Palestinian Christians to flee their ancestral homes in Bethlehem, Gaza, and the West Bank. Islamists do not want coexistence; they want a Middle East and North Africa cleansed of non-Muslims, with Europe next in line, followed by Canada, Australia, and the United States. Their project is global.
And when we look at the role of Qatar and Iran, the picture becomes even clearer. Qatar, which gifted Trump an airplane earlier this year, is not interested in peace or the end of Hamas. Its interest is in securing a place at the post-war negotiating table, ensuring that Hamas — or something very much like it — remains the dominant power in Gaza.
Qatar’s role is even darker than many in the West admit. Its money is not only keeping Hamas alive in Gaza, but also buying silence and sympathy in the very countries that claim to oppose terrorism. Qatari cash flows into think tanks, universities, lobbying firms, and even the pockets of politicians across the West. It funds endowed chairs on “Middle East studies” that miraculously frame Islamists as misunderstood actors and Israel as the root of all problems. It bankrolls lobbyists who whisper in congressional offices about the need for “dialogue” with Hamas or “balance” in dealing with Iran.
Western leaders who should know better find themselves compromised, unwilling to speak too loudly against Doha because Qatari investments prop up their institutions or bankroll their campaigns. This is not diplomacy; it is infiltration disguised as lobbying. Qatar has mastered the art of buying respectability abroad while underwriting extremism at home.
Iran, for its part, continues to funnel resources to Islamist proxies across the region, from Hezbollah to the Houthis. To believe that either regime would act in good faith to dismantle Hamas is a delusion. Some in the West are essentially asking arsonists to run the fire department.
Nor can the Palestinian Authority be trusted to govern Gaza. Its leader, Mahmoud Abbas, is 88 years old and presides over a kleptocracy so discredited that many Palestinians favor Hamas, even as the latter habitually kills, tortures, and jails its own people.
If the Palestinian Authority were parachuted into Gaza, Hamas would not vanish. Hamas has a long history of killing rival Palestinian leaders, and those it does not kill, it buys. Bribes, intimidation, and assassinations would ensure that the Palestinian Authority either collaborates with Hamas or collapses under its weight. To imagine the Palestinian Authority as a viable post-Hamas governing authority is to ignore both its weakness and Hamas’ ruthlessness.
And this is the crux of the problem: Whether it is Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, or any other faction dressed up as a governing authority, the ideology driving them remains the same. It is not a question of personalities or party names, but of an Islamist worldview that cannot coexist with the West.
Therefore, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a microcosm of the greater Islamist war against the non-Muslim world. That is why Trump’s call for a new international oversight body — the so-called “Board of Peace” — is doomed from the start. There is no peace to be had with Islamists. There is no shared humanity, no common ground, no possibility of compromise. Their worldview is one of supremacy.
The deeper tragedy is that much of the West is not only naïve in its foreign policy, it is incompetent in recognizing how Islamists are already subverting its own societies from within. The same absolutist ideology that fuels Hamas has found ways to exploit Western freedoms — freedom of speech, freedom of religion, academic freedom — turning those ideals against the very civilizations that enshrined them.
On college campuses, Islamist narratives dominate under the banner of “social justice,” silencing dissent and intimidating Jewish and pro-Israel students. In legislatures, Islamist-linked organizations lobby to whitewash extremism and insert their worldview into the policymaking process. The language of rights and inclusion is co-opted to erode the very freedoms it claims to defend.
The West congratulates itself on tolerance even as that tolerance is weaponized against it. This blindness, this inability to see that Islamism is not simply another opinion in the marketplace of ideas but an ideology that seeks to destroy the marketplace altogether, is why Western “peace plans” implode before they begin.
The only way to deal with such ideologies is to defeat them — just as the world defeated Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Imperial Japan, and eventually the Soviet Union. Anything less is appeasement, and appeasement always ends in bloodshed.
Even the much-celebrated Abraham Accords reveal the transactional nature of Arab-Israeli relations. Arab states want Israeli technology, intelligence, and investment opportunities, but they do not embrace Israel as a neighbor in the ideological sense. If they did, they would open their societies to democracy, pluralism, and multiculturalism. They have not. The accords are business deals, not bridges between civilizations. Western diplomats may cheer them as breakthroughs, but the regimes behind them remain Islamic monarchies and autocracies.
Why, then, did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agree to Trump’s 21-point plan? The answer is pragmatic politics. Netanyahu must show the Israeli public that he is doing everything possible to pursue peace and diplomacy, the hallmarks of the Western world to which Israel belongs.
He must also outmaneuver Hamas diplomatically. By agreeing to the plan, Netanyahu can demonstrate that it is not Israel standing in the way of peace, but Hamas itself. Indeed, Hamas official Muhammad Mardawi admitted on Al Jazeera that the plan “leans toward the Israeli perspective,” making it all the less likely Hamas will formally accept it.
Netanyahu knows this, and hopefully Trump does as well. In fact, Netanyahu is likely playing a longer game: By embracing the plan publicly, he buys Israel strategic cover for the day it may need to take unilateral action. He will be able to point to the world and say: “We tried your peace plan. Hamas refused. Now we will act.”
In the end, Trump’s plan will fail for the same reason every Western-brokered plan has failed — because much of the West keeps pretending that Islamism is just another political ideology, something rational and negotiable.
It is not.
Islamism is a supremacist creed bent on domination.
Hence, this 21-point plan for Gaza is not a bold blueprint for peace; it is another “peace in our time” moment, echoing Neville Chamberlain’s infamous delusion that Hitler could be appeased. Just as Chamberlain mistook a sworn ideologue for a reasonable statesman, much of the West today mistakes Hamas and its Islamist patrons for political actors who can be bought off or moderated. Trump’s plan is not a pathway to peace, but a house of cards waiting for the first gust of reality.
The West should have learned this lesson already from the Islamic Republic of Iran. In 2015, Tehran signed the much-heralded Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the so-called “Iran nuclear deal,” while secretly advancing the very program it had promised to halt. Inspectors were stonewalled, military sites remained off-limits, and intelligence later revealed that Iran never abandoned its nuclear ambitions; it merely slowed them down, lied about compliance, and pocketed billions in sanctions relief. Less than a decade later, Iran got within arm’s reach of nuclear weapons, hence the attacks a few months ago by Israel and the U.S. on Iranian nuclear infrastructure.
Until much of the West wakes up to this reality, every peace plan — whether it has two points or 21 — will be a diplomatic fantasy masquerading as policy. Just as fascism, Nazism, and communism had to be defeated rather than appeased, Islamism too must be met with clarity and resolve.
Anything else is self-deception, and self-deception in the face of such an enemy is a luxury that neither Israel nor the West can afford.
Escalating violence & chaos will help the globalists reach their goal of signing us all up for digital ID. They will be able to track the bad guys and stop crimes before they happen, for our ‘safety.’
SEP 29, 2025
NOTE: A big heartfelt ‘thank you’ to all of my paid subscribers. There are now 332 of you, and it’s because of you that I’m able to keep putting these updates out. This newsletter has roughly 15,000 free subscribers, and I realize many of them cannot afford $7 a month. If any of you can afford it, please consider upgrading and help me reach my goal of 350 paid subscribers.
President Trump said Saturday he will send troops to Portland, Oregon, “authorizing Full Force, if necessary” to handle what he referred to as domestic terrorism.
Trump made his announcement on social media, using the language of war.
He wrote that he was directing the U.S. Department of War to “provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland.”
This marks a continuation of Trump’s unprecedented military deployments to American cities in the name of crime-fighting, only now it’s also being done for the stated purpose of combatting terrorism. That’s an important distinction and a definite escalation of the brewing tensions between the feds and Democrat-run cities.
Fighting “terrorism” as opposed to regular crime, is a much more serious mission. It carries potentially much more serious ramifications, particularly after renaming the Department of Defense the Department of War. If a rioter is arrested as a terrorist instead of a regular criminal, he or she would theoretically not be subject to all of the constitutional protections afforded in a regular criminal case, such as access to a lawyer, the right to due process, the right to remain silent, the right to a speedy trial, the right to a jury trial of one’s peers, and so forth. They could also be sent before military tribunals instead of civil criminal courts.
This could get messy in a hurry and I could see a scenario where 10 or 15 cities explode in violent riots, potentially much worse than the summer of 2020. What happens when those riots are crushed by the military in the name of anti-terrorism? Will it set a new standard for how our military is used internally to settle political scores? What about the next president who might be a Democrat with a score to settle with conservative Americans?
The chaos, confusion and confrontation leading to potential civil war comes at the same time we are being driven by the neocons into international confrontation with Russia. It’s all by design. If America gets simultaneously bogged down in civil war and World War III, it’s lights out for freedom. The globalists will use a crisis of that magnitude to implement their biometric digital tracking system, which is Exhibit A for the global beast system. Once we get to that point, where the vast majority of people are convinced to voluntarily accept a biometric digital ID, we will have reached the point of no return. Beast system here we come. The one missing, fundamental component of a truly one-world surveillance state is a digital tracking system that controls the movement of all people. The EU, UK, Canada and much of the rest of the Western world are in various stages of implementing this digitization of humanity right now. Only America is left as the holdout.
Upgrade to paid
It’s my opinion that something really big must happen in America, making us all feel unsafe and vulnerable, setting the stage, similar to after 9/11, for the government to enter with a solution that makes people feel safe again.
The big event will be two-fold and it’s already starting to take shape. It involves violent civil war here at home and World War III with Russia and its allies on the global front.
Trump is playing an important role in bringing it to pass. He’s ramping up the militarization of our cities while at the same time taunting Russia with reckless rhetoric and policies with regard to its war with Ukraine. Trump just signed off on greenlighting Ukraine to fire Western missiles deep inside of Russia, which will provoke a Russian response.
On the domestic front, things are also heating up.
The Associated Press reported that Oregon’s Democrat Governor Tina Kotek responded to President Trump’s announced plan to send troops to Portland by saying Trump is abusing his authority. She says her city is doing “just fine” on its own. She was joined by other local government, police and business leaders who all said soldiers are not needed and Trump is presenting a patently false picture of the city.
Trump said the decision to send in troops was necessary to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities, which he said are “under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists.”
In an afternoon news conference, Governor Kotek said she told Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem earlier that troops are not needed and she believes he does not have the authority to deploy the military there.
She told reporters:
“We can manage our own local public safety needs. There is no insurrection. There is no threat to national security.”
Mayor Keith Wilson said at a news conference:
“This is an American city. We do not need any intervention. This is not a military target.”
Kotek said the president did not give a timetable for troops arriving. She said she told him the Oregon National Guard is not needed and she does not plan to call it up.
Kotek urged the public to stay calm, saying any kind of property damage or violence will not be tolerated.
She said, “Let’s not take the bait. Let’s not respond to what the president is trying to do.”
I don’t know about you, folks, but this has the makings of a budding civil war. If a president insists on sending federal troops into states where they are not welcome, whether it’s justified or not, that could get ugly real fast.
We already saw things getting out of control Sunday in Chicago.
America seems to be on the verge of melting down.
Barack Obama’s movie last year, Leave the World Behind, contained a key line when one of the characters said, “They have to get us to start killing each other.”
Right now, leaders on both the right and left seem eager to advance our society into that realm. And once a society arrives in that destination, there will be no turning back.
I pray that cooler heads will prevail, but right now I don’t see any. The loudest voices in the room all seem to want violence.
BOTTOM LINE: My advice is to prepare for civil war and potential martial law. Stock up on food, water, means of self-defense, gasoline, etc. Now is the time to prepare, if you haven’t already. Because the left-right paradigm is lining up for a violent encounter, and it could be sooner than we think.
Should Israel fear UN resolutions? MOSHE PHILLIPS
Many nations cast their votes not on the basis of what is right or wrong, or what is just or unjust, but according to their narrow interests.
Sept. 29, 2025 JNS
The U.N. General Assembly voted this month to endorse a scheme that French Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont said “lays out a single roadmap to deliver the two-state solution.”
Why? Because many world leaders apparently want to punish Israeli voters for keeping Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader they preferred, and his coalition, in office.
But does the U.N. vote really matter at all? Keep in mind that this resolution will have no practical impact since the world body has no way to enforce it. The real purpose of the resolution is to intimidate Israel and its supporters to make more concessions, and not to eradicate Hamas, as has been an official war aim of the Israeli government ever since the terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
Should we take this vote seriously? And should Netanyahu, who is himself a former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations?
In a dismissive remark in March 1955, David Ben-Gurion, then Israel’s defense minister, employed the Hebrew acronym “Um” for the United Nations and added a pejorative, “Um-Shmum.” He used the Yiddish idiom to convey casual dismissal during a cabinet debate regarding his plan to take the Gaza Strip from Egypt in response to increasing cross-border terrorist attacks on Israel. He understood that the Jewish state had to act to safeguard its national security, regardless of whether that made the Jewish state unpopular at the United Nations.
That’s why in his time, Ben-Gurion took such steps as the construction of Israel’s nuclear reactor in Dimona; the capture and trial of top Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann (condemned by the U.N. Security Council in its Resolution 138 on June 1960, which targeted Israel for a violation of Argentina’s sovereignty by Israel for seizing Eichmann who Argentina had been harboring); and the imposition of strict security measures on Arabs within Israel’s borders.
Ben-Gurion also recognized the inherent moral weakness of the United Nations. Every country—no matter how oppressive or bellicose—has the same voting power in the U.N. General Assembly as an enlightened, peaceful and democratic state. One country, one vote.Genocidal Sudan is equal to progressive Mexico.
Misogynistic Saudi Arabia is equal to egalitarian Belgium.
A country where black Africans are enslaved, such as Mauritania, is equal to a country that has rescued black Africans (from Ethiopia and Sudan), such as Israel.
A country ruled by a king, such as Jordan, is equal to a country run by a democratically elected president or prime minister.
The U.N. Security Council is equally problematic. Russia, which has spent years in a war against Ukraine to grab some of its territory, and China, which arms terrorist regimes and genocide-perpetrators around the world, enjoy the same veto power as the other permanent members of the Security Council: France, the United Kingdom and the United States. Furthermore, every country, no matter how oppressive or undemocratic, gets its turn among the Security Council’s 10 non-permanent seats.
Many nations cast their votes not on the basis of what is right or wrong or what is just or unjust, but rather, according to their narrow interests, their fear of increases in Arab oil prices or their Marxist principles.
This U.N. resolution on Palestinian Arab statehood is simply a moral farce. Those who voted in favor did not consider whether such a state would be a democracy or a dictatorship; whether or not “Palestine” would endanger Israel; or what the Palestinian Authority’s track record reveals about how a Palestinian state would behave. And that’s if the P.A. can keep Hamas from expelling it from power.
Such real-world considerations have no place in the absurd, upside-down fantasy world in which the United Nations dwells. That’s why whenever some resolution at the world body targets Israel, one thing Israelis and their friends should do is recall the simple wisdom of Ben-Gurion: “Um-Shmum!”
Danny Danon, Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, has said that “this one-sided declaration will not be remembered as a step toward peace, only as another hollow gesture that weakens this assembly’s credibility.” He is right.
MOSHE PHILLIPS Moshe Phillips, a veteran pro-Israel activist and author, is the national chairman of Americans For a Safe Israel (AFSI). A former board member of the American Zionist Movement, he previously served as national director of the U.S. division of Herut and worked with CAMERA in Philadelphia. He was also a delegate to the 2020 World Zionist Congress and served as editor of The Challenger, the publication of the Tagar Zionist Youth Movement. His op-eds and letters have been widely published in the United States and Israel.
Megyn Kelly is Making Antisemitism Respectable Again ELIE MISCHEL
SEPTEMBER 25, 2025 Israel 365 News
On the first Megyn Kelly Show after Charlie Kirk’s murder, something slipped by almost unnoticed — a moment that should have set off alarm bells.
Kirk, the powerhouse who built Turning Point USA into the flagship youth arm of the MAGA movement, had been one of Kelly’s most frequent guests. His horrific death left millions around the world in mourning — and instantly became the subject of conspiracies. Candace Owens, an antisemite who has accused Jews of sacrificing Christian children, immediately stepped forward with her own insane version of events: Charlie, she claimed, had been pressured by Jewish donors, offered money, and even courted by Benjamin Netanyahu himself to bring him back in line on Israel. She then said: “I know feigning victimhood is kind of an Israeli brand thing, but I was clear that Charlie felt blackmailed by the offer to fund TPUSA, which he refused.”
This was classic Candace Owens conspiracy theorizing. But on that day, Megyn Kelly didn’t treat Owens like the crank she is. She didn’t confront her history of bizarre Holocaust minimization, blood libel claims, or talk of Jewish cabals. She didn’t put Owens in the bucket with conspiracy-mongers who have no place in serious politics. Instead, she treated her as if she were a leading MAGA thinker whose opinion deserved space. She described Candace as “brilliant,” urged people to watch Candace’s videos, and said: “Candace, who’s been critical of Israel in this conflict, did not appreciate that we had a foreign leader reading part of Charlie’s letter… And she is not wrong about that.”
The American left already went down this road years ago. Proud antisemites like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Zohran Mamdani are now treated as legitimate voices and even leaders within the Democratic mainstream. But Kelly’s choice signaled that the right is now stumbling down the same dangerous path.
Megyn Kelly is not an antisemite. She says it plainly: “I’m totally a Zionist. I completely believe in Israel’s right to exist.” But that’s not the point. By granting Candace Owens the dignity of serious engagement — by treating a woman who traffics in Holocaust minimization, blood libel, and Jewish cabal theories as a credible commentator — Kelly sent a clear message. Antisemitism is no longer disqualifying on the American right. You can spew the oldest, ugliest lies about Jews and still be welcomed as a legitimate voice in the conservative mainstream.
Kelly began walking down this dark path a few weeks earlier, when she sat down with Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Rather than confront Greene’s famously kooky antisemitic record — the Rothschild “space lasers,” the mask-mandates-as-Holocaust analogies, the claims of Israeli “control” over Congress — Kelly reassured her audience: “Any anti-Israel people are welcome here… you’re allowed to have that view.”
Predictably, Greene launched into her familiar lines about AIPAC exerting “incredible influence and control over nearly every single one of my colleagues.” Instead of challenging the conspiratorial claim, Kelly echoed it: “I can feel the pressure being slightly ratcheted up… This is America. You’re allowed to have your view. Israel is not America.”
Even Greene’s most absurd claims — such as U.S. courts supposedly protecting the Israeli flag from burning — were met with quick correction followed by sympathy. And then came the absolution: “I know you have nothing against Israel. Oh gosh, no. Never mind Jews. That’s all a lie.”
Kelly’s message was unmistakable: whatever Greene’s history of antisemitic rhetoric, she would be treated as a legitimate voice, another member in good standing of the conservative conversation.
This isn’t the first time conservatives have faced a choice about whether to treat antisemitic conspiracy-mongers as respectable voices. William F. Buckley Jr., the founder of National Review, understood this danger. Among his most important contributions to modern conservatism was drawing a clear line against antisemitism — and enforcing it.
In the 1960s, Buckley took aim at the John Birch Society, whose paranoid conspiracies — communists under every bed, traitors in every government office — threatened to drag the right into disrepute. The Birchers trafficked openly in antisemitic conspiracy theories, and Buckley recognized that if the fever swamps were allowed to define the movement, conservatism would lose both its intellectual standing and its moral claim to leadership. He expelled them from respectability.
Three decades later, the challenge returned in sharper form. Senior National Review editor Joseph Sobran had developed what Buckley called “a cumulative tone” of hostility toward Jews and Israel. Pat Buchanan, in his opposition to the Gulf War, spoke of Congress as “Israel’s amen corner.” Buckley confronted both men, and Sobran was pushed off the National Review masthead. Buchanan, Buckley concluded, had crossed into rhetoric that “amounted to antisemitism, whatever it was that drove him to say and do it.”
In his 1992 book In Search of Antisemitism, Buckley laid down the principle that has guided serious conservatism ever since: “It is not enough to say that antisemitism is wrong, though of course it is. The point is that antisemitism disqualifies. A conservative who is an antisemite is not only wrong but unqualified to serve the conservative cause.”
That was the standard — no indulgence, no welcome back into polite company. Of course, antisemitism never disappeared from the right; it persisted in corners of the party and among certain figures. But Buckley’s line forced the haters to whisper, to hide, to know that their poison had no place in the open. That discipline made space for Jews to flourish in the conservative movement. And it is precisely that standard that Megyn Kelly has now begun to erode.
We now live in a political world where Tucker Carlson — who has turned Israel into an obsession, spun Jeffrey Epstein into a Jewish conspiracy, and regularly platforms open antisemites — is nonetheless feted by the Vice President of the United States and treated as a leading light of conservatism. Where Candace Owens, who calls Holocaust survivor testimony “propaganda” and accuses Israel of blackmail, is treated as a peer on the biggest conservative podcasts. Where Marjorie Taylor Greene, who rants about Rothschild lasers and Jewish “control” of Congress, is given a warm welcome by Megyn Kelly.
Buckley once drew a line and held it: antisemitism was poison, and those who trafficked in it had no place in the conservative mainstream. That line is gone. Today, the very figures he would have banished are not just tolerated. They are elevated, celebrated, and given the microphone as leading voices of the right.
This is not just a Jewish problem. Yes, it is ominous for American Jews, who find themselves increasingly targeted by antisemites who now enjoy legitimacy they once lacked. But it is also ominous for the American right itself. A movement that once prided itself on moral clarity is surrendering that clarity before our eyes.
Ever since the left’s descent into woke bigotry during the Obama years, the right has stood as the counterweight — the place where antisemitism was understood to disqualify. If that standard falls, the right will lose not only its moral compass but also its claim to lead.
For now, American Jews have a gift in Donald Trump — a president who has been a stalwart defender of Israel and regularly calls out antisemitism on campuses. But Trump will not be on the stage forever. And the movement that comes after him is increasingly led by the very antisemites and bigots Buckley once exiled.
That future should terrify everyone. For American Jews, it points to a coming storm of open hostility. For the America First movement, it marks the forfeiting of its moral authority. And for America itself, it signals something darker still: a politics where antisemitism is not shunned, but weaponized as a path to influence and power.
Unless America wakes up now, antisemitism will entrench itself at the heart of American politics. And a nation that lets antisemitism into its halls of power is a nation hell-bent on tearing itself apart.
Don’t Blame Trump for Blocking Annexation. Blame Israel. Elie Mischel
SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 Israel 365 News
“Iwill not allow Israel to annex the West Bank. Nope.” With those blunt words last week, President Trump sent shockwaves through Israel and around the world. A president who once championed Israeli sovereignty has now declared that he will not allow the Jewish people to annex their own biblical heartland. His message was clear: Judea and Samaria are bargaining chips to be traded for his peace plan and business deals with Arab leaders.
Trump’s announcement comes only a few days before Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, the holiest day of the year. It is a day when Jews stand before God and repent—not only for personal sins like failing to honor the Shabbat or speaking cruelly to a friend, but for national sins. This year, our greatest national sin has been exposed for all to see: we ourselves have treated Judea and Samaria as negotiable, and so President Trump has simply reflected our weakness back at us.
For more than thirty years, Israel’s leaders have dangled pieces of our inheritance as bargaining chips, pretending that land given to us by God could be exchanged for temporary quiet or international approval. No one reflects this more than Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. At times he speaks with the language of strength, promising sovereignty, but he never treats it as a duty—only as a tool to be bartered. Judea and Samaria are not “optional,” yet our leaders behave as if they were.
Trump’s latest plan for Gaza and the wider Arab world only makes that reality explicit: Israel will be barred from applying sovereignty over its biblical heartland. That clause is not an American invention. It is the direct result of our own equivocation. Netanyahu has not been betrayed by Trump; he has been exposed.
The prophet Joel condemns the nations that divide God’s land: “I will gather all the nations, and I will bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat; and I will contend with them there concerning My people and My heritage Israel, whom they scattered among the nations, and My land they divided” (Joel 4:2). Notice His words: “My land.” Not Israel’s to barter, not the UN’s to parcel out, not America’s to approve or forbid. God calls it His land, yet for thirty years we have acted as though it were negotiable. That is our sin.
Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook taught that repentance is not only individual but national, and that national repentance cannot be avoided. An individual Jew may choose to ignore his personal sins, but the Jewish nation will always be forced back toward its national destiny. Yom Kippur is therefore not only about refraining from gossip, or lust, or anger. It is about correcting the betrayal of our people’s purpose. National repentance means rejecting the Oslo mentality, ending the shameful division of our homeland into “Areas A, B, and C,” and declaring once and for all that Judea and Samaria belong only to Israel.
Let us be honest: this is not about Trump. It is about us. We have treated sovereignty as a political tool instead of a divine mandate. We have allowed thirty years of cowardice to harden into policy. And unless we repent, we will go on hearing the nations tell us what we ourselves have already implied: that God’s land is negotiable.
Yom Kippur is our moment to break that cycle. Repentance means course correction. It means ending the double talk and declaring that the land of Israel belongs to the people of Israel under the sovereignty of the God of Israel. If we cannot say that with clarity, we will have betrayed not only ourselves but generations of Jews who prayed for this moment.
[Ed.: Donald J. Trump trumped The Creator of the universe, GOD. Imagine that! Wait for it: the Divine FAFO…]
September 27, 2025 Fox News
“Real Time” host Bill Maher said on Friday’s episode the killing of Christians in Nigeria by Islamist groups is being ignored because “the Jews aren’t involved.”
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., noted during the panel’s discussion that the media has failed to cover the tragedy occurring in Nigeria and thanked Maher for bringing the issue to light.
“Well, because the Jews aren’t involved. That’s why,” Maher responded. “It’s the Christians and the Muslims — who cares?”
The “Real Time” host said Boko Haram, an Islamist group in the region, is “literally attempting to wipe out the Christian population of an entire country,” asking, “Where are the kids protesting this?”
“They are systematically killing the Christians in Nigeria. They’ve killed over 100,000 since 2009. They’ve burned 18,000 churches. This is so much more. These are the Islamists, Boko Haram. This is so much more of a genocide attempt than what is going on in Gaza,” he said.
Maher said the tragedy had not garnered the attention he believed it deserves, arguing that if “you don’t know what’s going on in Nigeria, your media sources suck.”
“You are in a bubble,” he said.
The U.K. division of Open Doors, a global Christian charity that advocates for Christians persecuted for their faith, told Fox News Digital, “The crisis facing large areas of sub-Saharan Africa is hard to overstate. It is potentially existential for the future peace and stability of several nations in the region, not least Nigeria.
“Around 150,000 people have been killed in Jihadist violence over the last 10 years. Over 16 million Christians have been driven from their homes and their land across the region.”
Nigeria is considered one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a Christian. Recent Open Doors research shows that more Christians are killed for their faith in Nigeria than the rest of the world combined.
The White House previously confirmed it is working closely with the State Department to find ways to stop the killing and support stability in the region.
Dennis Prager’s First Public Appearance Since His Injury [1:38:34] Dennis Prager
Sep 26, 2025 Real Talk
In this very special interview, PragerU Co-Founder Dennis Prager speaks with PragerU CEO Marissa Streit on camera for the first time since his spinal cord injury in November 2024. Dennis speaks frankly about his current condition, why he’s still happy, and what he believes about God, justice, and the afterlife. Dennis also discusses Charlie Kirk’s legacy (including Charlie’s book dedication to Dennis and his commitment to Shabbat), free speech vs. “hate speech,” the confusion around antisemitism, transgender violence and America’s moral crisis. Finally, Dennis shares the big ideas in his forthcoming book, If There Is No God… The Battle Over Who Defines Good and Evil.
US policy on Iran – Waking up to Reality? Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger
September 25, 2025 “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative”
*As far as Iran’s Ayatollah regime is concerned – notwithstanding US statements, and independent of Israel’s existence – the war against “the infidel” West, “The Great American Satan” and the “apostate” Sunnis is not over!
*According to the Ayatollah regime, since the June 2025 12-day-war, there is a temporary ceasefire, while Iran persists in its subversive, terrorist and war-like endeavors: attempting to topple the pro-US regimes in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco; supporting Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthi terrorists; undermining the US strategic posture in Latin America (since 1980) through a tight collaboration with drug cartels, terror organizations and all anti-US governments; and expanding – in collaboration with China and Russia – its network of sleeper cells on US soil.
*Since June 2025, China, North Korea and possibly Russia have been involved 24/7 in restoring and upgrading Iran’s air force, air defenses, ballistic and nuclear capabilities. China has focussed on Iran’s ballistic and air defense capabilities, supplying guidance systems, microprocessors, ground-to-air missiles, components and scientific expertise, paid for by Iranian oil at a discounted price. North Korea has provided Iran ballistic and nuclear assistance, as well as underground infrastructure expertise. Notwithstanding its preoccupation with the war against Ukraine, Russia is partaking (so far, in a limited manner) in the restoration of Iran’s air force and air defense infrastructures, directly and via Belarus.
*The key challenge facing the US is to avoid – rather than repeat – critical blunders, highlighted by the 1978/79 US embrace of Ayatollah Khomeini, which launched the US diplomatic (negotiation) option toward the Ayatollah regime. The 48-year-old self-destructive US negotiation option, which hasbeen accompanied by reversible and by-passable economic sanctions, catapulted the Ayatollah regime from a 2nd class strategic power to a primary regional and global power. It has transformed Iran from “The American Policeman of the Gulf” to the leading epicenter of anti-US Islamic terrorism, drug trafficking and money laundering in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, the US’ soft underbelly.
*The survival of the apocalyptic, imperialistic Ayatollah regime on the one hand, and the US goal of preventing, minimizing and ending war and terrorism, on the other hand, constitutes an oxymoron.
*Contrary to the Western state of mind, the Ayatollah regime is not driven by “Money Talks” and enhancing standard of living, but by Shiite (Twelver) Islam and history (e.g., the 680 AD Battle of Kerbala, the 939 AD disappearance of the Hidden 12th Imam, etc.), which have determined the Ayatollah’s vision, Constitution, strategy, tactics, school curriculum and mosque sermons, which have become the most effective production line of anti-US terrorists.
*While the US considers negotiation with Iran as a step towards reconciliation and peaceful coexistence, the Ayatollah regime considers negotiation as a way to avoid further military setback, stalling, restoring capabilities, and resuming efforts to advance a fanatic, apocalyptic, imperialistic vision.
*Since 1978, the Ayatollah regime has skillfully leveraged the Western eagerness to end war and terrorism, employing the classic Islamic and Iranian tactics of negotiation, such as the Taqiyyah (dissimulation), Kitman (deceit by omission, half truth) and Khod’eh (misinformation and disinformation rather than outright deception).
*Since 1978, the US policy toward the Ayatollah regime has taken lightly the unshakable centrality of the 1,400-year-old fanatic ideology in determining the Ayatollah’s conduct. Thus, US policy toward the Ayatollah regime has focused on diplomacy/negotiation, as well as occasional economic sanctions, which have not induced the regime to accept peaceful coexistence with its Sunni neighbors, become a good faith negotiator, and abandon its fanatic ideology. Therefore, changing the regime, which is a chief epicenter of globalwar and terrorism, is the only option to prevent, minimize or end war and terrorism.
*Refraining from regime change in Iran, would pave the road to a nuclear Ayatollah regime, which – unlike current nuclear powers – would be the first ever apocalyptic nuclear regime!
What Were Those 274 FBI Agents Doing at The Capitol on Jan. 6 By Robert Spencer
September 27, 2025
It has been blazingly obvious that the Jan. 6 “insurrection,” which the left has used for over four years now to try to portray Trump as a dangerous would-be dictator and his supporters as violent fascists, was a set-up ever since the videos began circulating of police holding open the Capitol doors as the supposed “insurrectionists” strolled leisurely in. Now, however, it is even clearer that the whole Jan. 6 “insurrection” was an attempt to frame Trump for allegedly trying to overthrow the government, which, if it had worked, would have kept him from running for president again: it has now come to light that 274 undercover FBI agents were in the crowd on that day.
What they were doing there is not really in any serious doubt, but that doesn’t mean that they’ve admitted it. In fact, according to a Friday report in The Blaze, the spin has already begun: “a senior congressional source said the number is not necessarily a surprise, since the FBI often embeds countersurveillance personnel at large events.” Yeah, sure, that’s it. They were just there for crowd control. They were on the side of the angels.
Few, if any, patriotic American would have doubted that in the first place, except for the fact that the leftist establishment has been lying about all this for years, and is still lying about it now. The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Inspector General claimed as late as Dec. 2024 that everything was on the up and up regarding feds acting as agents provocateurs on Jan. 6: “We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6.”
The Blaze explains that depending how one reads ‘undercover’ agents versus ‘plainclothes agents,’ both statements could be true.” So the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Inspector General is either lying to us or intentionally misleading us. How reassuring! “The same report,” The Blaze continues, “disclosed that 26 FBI confidential human sources were in the Jan. 6 crowds, four of whom entered the Capitol.” So four (at least) were “insurrectionists.” Were they acting on FBI orders? The feds deny it. But there are just so many lingering questions.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) asked a pointed question: “But with that many paid informants being in the crowd, we want to know how many were in the crowd, how many were in the building, but I also want to know, were they paid to inform or instigate?” And now the FBI has revealed that it had 274 people there, making the Inspector General’s report look outrageously disingenuous.
So in an effort to get to the bottom of this. I wrote to an FBI agent: Lindsay Capodilupo, who was identified during the darkest days of the Biden regime as the FBI’s “Election Crimes Coordinator.” What a title! In light of the fake Jan. 6 insurrection, it must be asked: was she coordinating election crimes, or trying to stop them?
I figured I’d ask her directly. As it happens, I have met Lindsay Capodilupo, as she was one of the agents who questioned me after Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists attempted to murder Pamela Geller and me and whoever else they could kill at our free speech event in Garland, Texas, in May 2015, while an FBI informant egged the terrorists on, telling them to “tear up Texas.” So on Friday morning, I sent her an email:
Dear Ms. Capodilupo
Greetings. You may remember me, as we had some interaction some years ago. You even came to my office in 2015 to gather information about the Garland, Texas jihad terror attack. I wrote you in 2022 about your job as the FBI’s “Election Crimes Coordinator.” You didn’t answer my inquiries then; I hope you will do so now, in the interest of the transparency in government that I’m sure you support.
1. Are you still with the FBI? I was unable to find out for sure.
2. Are you still the “Election Crimes Coordinator”? If so, what are your duties?
3. Were you one of the undercover FBI agents at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021?
4. If the answer to #3 is yes, did you engage in activities that would have resulted in your being charged with “insurrection” against the U.S. government had you not been an undercover FBI agent?
5. Do you believe that “misinformation,” which the FBI during your tenure as “Election Crimes Coordinator” categorized as an “election crime,” should be outlawed?
6. If the answer to #5 is yes, who should be the judge of what constitutes “misinformation” and what does not? This question is especially important in light of the fact that several highly touted instances of alleged “misinformation” turned out to be true, while other incidents presented as fact turned out to be fiction, such as the Jan. 6 “insurrection.”
Many thanks in advance for your answers; please send them by 2 p.m. today, as I’m working on a deadline.
Kindest regards and thanks for your patriotic service to the United States of America, if your service can indeed be characterized as patriotic.
Robert Spencer
You’re not likely to be surprised to learn that Ms. Capodilupo did not deign to respond. And that, really, is more of an eloquent response than she could have formulated in words. She was essentially telling me that my inquiries were unimportant and that I wasn’t worth her time. This is how the left has behaved for years about Jan. 6 and its other efforts to frame Trump and destroy the lives of patriots.
It’s time to end all the speculation and guesswork once and for all. The Trump Justice Department should open all of its Jan. 6 files, and let the American people know once and for all who oversaw the frame-up, and who was involved. Oh, and if it hasn’t already, fire this elitist “Election Crimes Coordinator.”
Maher: Dems Don’t Stand for Anything Other than Opposing Trump [12:56] IAN HANCHETT
27 Sep 2025 – During the online “Overtime” segment of Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher discussed polling numbers about who voters prefer on different issues and stated that while some of the issues Democrats have are due to people being misinformed, Democrats also don’t have anything they stand for other than opposing President Donald Trump.
Maher said, “Trump’s numbers are down. They’re down with Latinos. They’re down with blacks. They’re down 15 points with whites. … And yet, in the other poll, on issues, Trump’s still winning. So, this is your big opportunity, Democrats. He’s down in the numbers, and you still can’t score.”
He added, “Now, some of this is just because people are f*cking stupid.” And cited Democrats only having a 2-point polling edge on respect for democracy as an example of this.
After Maher read more from the polling data, CNN host Michael Smerconish said, “The only thing the Democratic Party stands for today is opposition to Donald Trump.” And Maher responded, “Yeah.”
Smerconish added that former Vice President Kamala Harris’ recent book has no plan for Democrats in the future, which is “indicative of the party at large.” Which Maher also agreed with.
“This is the END of OBAMA — Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why” [6:42]
Sep 26, 2025 Point of view
Special Thanks to Victor Davis Hanson
Obama got exactly the presidency he always wanted—unaccountable, hidden, his operatives running the show while he stayed above the fray. Biden was the perfect effigy, the mask that let Obama’s agenda move in the shadows: open borders, Soros prosecutors, critical race dogma, retreat abroad, Iran’s nuclear gamble—all without his fingerprints. And yet, while lecturing America on sacrifice, Obama built his own empire of mansions, estates, and monuments, gliding between Martha’s Vineyard, Hawaii, and Washington as if he were a detached pastor of a faith he never truly practiced.
Victor Davis Hanson exposes the illusion: a leader who derided capitalism while enriching himself through it, a moral preacher who sneers at the very freedoms that made his rise possible. This is the paradox of Obama’s legacy—power without risk, influence without accountability. And as Hanson shows, America is still living in the shadow of that arrangement.
In a world of illusions and double standards, Hanson gives us clarity. He doesn’t just analyze history—he unmasks the present.
Trump is Preparing for the Storm CLANDESTINE
SEP 27, 2025
Trump’s plan is genius.
POTUS technically does not need to invoke the Insurrection Act to send US Military to defend federal property, it’s considered a federal function, NOT local policing.
So Trump can move troops to ICE facilities, have forces in place preemptively, then if he chooses to invoke the Insurrection Act, troops will already be in position, on standby.
The Insurrection Act would be needed if US MIL were to be engaged in riot control, general law enforcement, or quelling rebellion not on federal property.
Trump is putting himself in position so that if he does choose to invoke the Insurrection Act, he already has troops in place at areas of need, and can flip the switch at any moment from defense to offense.
My guess is that the decision is already made. Trump is getting his ducks in a row before he strikes, which is generally his modus operandi.
Battles are won before they begin.
Minnesota snakes Peggy Tierney
TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS
SEP 27, 2025
During my political journey, the Koch Libertarians of Minnesota once told me that social media has a right to censor conservatives because they are private companies and they have the “liberty” to do what they want, that the networks can lie to us all they want because of “free speech” and open expression, that open borders are required to facilitate “free trade” and “freedom to roam” in the name of global liberty – that abortion, prostitution and street drug use are “human rights” and should not be restricted in any way and that Sharia Law should be allowed to exist in America because of “freedom of expression.”
I told them that I disagreed with all of their points:
I told them that social media gets a free pass from Congress with Section 230 and taxpayer subsidies so conservatives PAY for their right to exist and social media should not be allowed to censor one person over the other because of politics. If they want to censor us – remove Section 230 and every dime from We the People.
I told them that the networks like ABC, CBS, NBC all lease the airwaves from We the People and are ALSO subsidized by the taxpayer, and the FCC requires they must not distort the news to enjoy those licenses, so NO they do not have a right to be an arm of the DNC, shill for the left and lie to our faces while taking our money.
I told them that “free” trade is not “fair” trade and that America can’t afford to absorb BILLIONS of people from all over the world – house and feed the worst of the worst of their criminals – and remain “the land of the free and home of the brave.” Look at the Democrat-run cities of today with NO law and order where criminals roam free (like Memphis, Philly, Baltimore and Detroit) and tell me how all that “freedom” is working!
I told them that Islam is NOT even a religion – it was created by warlords 600 years after Christ to use as an excuse to invade and conquer – which is obvious to any thinking person today.
This is why I despise Koch Libertarians like Thomas Massie, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Gary Johnson and Justin Amash – not to mention Jake and his “libertarian” pals in Minnesota. They are the worst kind of snakes – they pretend to be conservatives but they are NOT – they are Globalist social liberals and anarchists who want open borders, free weed and debauchery. That’s the truth.
Ask them what their true purpose is and they will tell you: to destroy Trump & MAGA and turn America into another 3rd world Sodom & Gomorrah – where they live in gated communities with armed guards doing whatever they please and the rest of the people are on their own. In other words – they are DEMOCRATS.
Sorry – I just got another email from one so I had to get that off my chest!
The Libertarian Party, Tea Party, AFP & the Freedom Caucus were ALL started by the Koch Brothers to fracture the right & HELP Democrats win! TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS MARCH 16, 2023
Did you know that David Koch, of the Koch Brothers, was the Libertarian Party’s VP candidate in 1980? Read full story
Koch Libertarian Snakes JUN 4, 2025
Right after Elon Musk bashed Trump’s OBBB bill and praised the Koch Libertarians – like Rand Paul and Thomas Massie – Elon’s Twitter pal, Jack Dorsey, endorsed Paul/Massie for 2028. Read full story
Crash course in politics (Part 2) TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS JUL 26, 2025
This is PART 2 of the story of my journey into politics in Minnesota. If you haven’t read it yet, you can find PART 1 here: Read full story
Trump’s 21-Point Gaza Plan? Relax Avi Abelow
September 27, 2025 Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group
So the headlines are buzzing with “Trump’s 21-point plan to end the Gaza war.” People are panicking, protesting, calling it a betrayal. And I get it, if I knew this is his actual plan, I would be going crazy as well, as this plan sounds like a warmed-over version of the Oslo disaster, with technocratic governments, Hamas amnesty, UN-administered aid, and even a “credible path to Palestinian statehood.”
But here’s the thing: I don’t buy that this is the real plan. Not for a second.
Why?
Because it directly contradicts what Prime Minister Netanyahu just said at the United Nations on Friday, after a three-hour meeting with Trump’s own people, Steven Witkoff, and Jared Kushner.
Netanyahu didn’t mince words at the UN.
As I wrote on Friday, at the UN, on the world stage, he finally acknowledged what we’ve been saying from day one:
* 90% of Arab Muslims in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria supported the October 7th massacre. Our enemy is not Hamas, it’s the whole society that identifies as “palestinians”.
* The Palestinian Authority is no different from Hamas.
* The State of Israel is united against the creation of a Palestinian state. Period.
These are not small statements. These are historic from Netanyahu who never uttered them before.
Netanyahu knows that Oslo failed. He knows that giving land and power to a Jew-killing terror entity doesn’t bring peace, it brings mass graves of Jews. And after three decades of disaster, he’s finally, finally, moving the diplomatic dial in the direction of truth.
So ask yourself: Does it make sense that immediately after that speech, Netanyahu would turn around and endorse a plan that talks about “pathways to statehood,” “amnesty for Hamas,” and a UN-led rebuilding project for the Palestinian Authority to take over Gaza?
Of course not. The math doesn’t add up.
Here’s what we do know:
* This plan was leaked, not released officially.
* It’s being floated by people close to Trump, but not by Trump himself.
* It appears intentionally vague in key areas, like who’s running Gaza, who’s being given amnesty, and what “statehood” actually means.
And here’s what we don’t know:What Trump actually told Netanyahu. That meeting is happening this coming Monday.
So let’s not jump the gun.
If anything, this leak feels like a trial balloon, a way to test reactions. And from what I’m seeing, the reaction is overwhelmingly negative among pro-Israel voices who see this plan for what it is: a repackaging of everything that led to October 7th in the first place. The total capitulation of Israel to a genocidal Islamonaz*i enemy funded by Iran & Qatar.
But the real test is what happens Monday. That’s when we’ll know whether Trump is listening to the same failed diplomatic voices intent on appeasing this 1,400+ year Islamic jihad evil that also endangers America and the West, or whether he not.
Netanyahu’s speech at the UN was a significant step in the right direction diplomatically for Israel.
It wasn’t everything we wanted, but it was the clearest statement yet from Netanyahu that Israel is done pretending the PA is a “peace partner” and done pretending that we will ever entertain a Palestinian state as the answer.
But speeches are just words.
Now we need action:
* Full Israeli sovereignty over Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.
* Jewish resettlement of Gaza, just like we did after 1967 in Judea and Samaria.
* Voluntary emigration programs for Arabs who don’t want to live under Jewish sovereignty, and yes, that includes the kind of framework Trump hinted at in past speeches, not this 21 point plan nonsense.
In the meantime, my advice is for people to take a deep breath and wait for after the Trump-Netanyahu meeting.
This so-called “21-point plan”? It’s not consistent with reality and it’s not consistent with Netanyahu.
So be patient. Keep your eyes open. And wait to see what comes out of Monday’s meeting between Netanyahu and Trump.
That’s the moment that will tell us whether this plan was a serious policy direction, or just a diplomatic dream to appease the Arab world, from people still clinging to the two-state mirage.
Either way, one thing is clear:
The Jewish people aren’t going back to the days of surrender and delusion. Not after October 7th. Not ever again.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
Stoking Antisemitism by Linda Goudsmit
September 27, 2025
The controversy over Tucker Carlson’s antisemitic remarks at Charlie Kirk’s memorial service on September 21, 2025, demands answers to two foundational and separate questions:
1. Who gains from the assassination of Charlie Kirk?
2. Is Tucker Carlson advocating antisemitism?
To answer these questions, we must first examine the Judeo-Christian tradition itself. Our Founding Fathers were Christian men whose ethics and morality derived from their Judeo-Christian roots and then provided the infrastructure for our founding documents including the United States Constitution. So, who are the Jews and who are the Christians who still represent the originating Judeo-Christian tradition of our Founding Fathers?
Charlie Kirk was a born-again Christian who preached faith, family, and flag––the original triptych of commitments that support individualism and freedom in America’s constitutional republic, Canada, Western Europe, and Israel. The political assassination of Charlie Kirk had three tactical objectives:
1. To stop Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the American non-profit organization founded by Charlie Kirk in 2012, and end its mission of promoting the nation’s return to our Founding Fathers’ conservative policies and principles.
2. To stop Charlie Kirk from speaking and end his iconic “Prove Me Wrong” events on college campuses.
3. To stop young people from embracing Americanism and returning to their historical Judeo-Christian roots.
I speak as an American citizen, but what I am saying applies to Canada, Western Europe, and Israel. The world is at war: Globalism vs. Nationalism:
Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite. The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of objective reality into the madness of subjective reality. America’s children are the primary target of the globalist predators. (Linda Goudsmit, Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is, 2024)
The globalist elite are an international consortium of extremely powerful, ubra-wealthy, men and women in and out of governments whose goal is to rule the world with absolute power. The globalist elite advocate the overthrow of the current world order of sovereign nation states and support transnational governance under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated organizations. The globalism and the globalist elite who I reference are specifically Western megalomaniacs who will ultimately be challenged by the equally megalomaniacal communists and Islamists who are also determined to rule the world. And before anyone dismisses this as a conspiracy theory, it is essential to remember that every conspiracy begins with a theory. (Linda Goudsmit, Rich Swier Interview, November 2024)
So, who gains from the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Certainly not Israel led by nationalist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu because, like the United States, Israel is a bifurcated nation. Leftist (Marxist, Labor, Socialist, progressive, whatever their label) politicians in Israel, America, Canada, and Western Europe, stand against the politicians and citizens who support nationalism in their respective countries. President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu are unapologetically committed to the sovereignty of their nations and to the individual freedom of their citizens. The bifurcation that is destabilizing Western nations around the world is the conflict between globalism and nationalism, between collectivism and individualism.
Tactically, the globalist elite fund and foment the divisiveness and chaos that leftism intentionally creates inside nation-states around the world. Leftists are the universal soldiers who do the dirty work of the globalists. They divide, weaken, and collapse nation-states from within in preparation for imposition of globalism’s planetary, totalitarian Unistate.
The globalist elite strategists understand the universal human longing to belong and understand that religion is and always has been an essential component of social order, cultural identity, individual identity, and national identity. Globalism exploits human nature by disguising its totalitarian Unistate as the place of planetary peace and unity, because we are all in this together. What globalists fail to disclose is that the Unistate is a regression back to the binary structure of rulers and ruled on a planetary scale.
Born again Christians are those who accept Jesus Christ as their Savior and experience a spiritual rebirth and new life in faith. Charlie Kirk was an exemplary born again Christian and an existential political threat to the globalist elite. Charlie Kirk’s very personal message to young Americans on college campuses was to reject the anti-American, progressive, Marxist, pro-Islamist, globalist indoctrination they were receiving from their leftist/liberal professors. Charlie Kirk provided America’s youth an alternative lifestyle and encouraged them to return to our founding Judeo-Christian values of faith, family, and flag. The assassin killed the messenger but could not kill the message. Since Charlie Kirk’s memorial service on September 21, 2025, there have been over 100,000 requests for new chapters of TPUSA.
Charlie Kirk was a visionary who understood that the battlefield for America must be fought at the frontlines, on college campuses where the next generations of American leaders and followers were being indoctrinated in Marxism, not educated in Americanism. Charlie Kirk was a staunch supporter of President Trump and was successfully bringing young people into the populist Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Kirk demonstrated how a return to Americanism and its founding Judeo-Christian values of faith, family, and flag would provide beauty and happiness in their lives.
So, when Tucker Carlson speaks at the memorial for Charlie Kirk, and stokes antisemitic conspiracy theories by inferring that Israel is responsible for the assassination of Charlie Kirk, then Tucker Carlson is also doing the dirty work of the globalists. Carlson’s divisive language is a disguised attempt to shatter the born-again Christian commitment to the Jewish State of Israel and to the Jewish people. From a political point of view, if the globalists can tactically divide the Judeo-Christian tradition that supports the national sovereignty of America and Israel, then Tucker Carlson’s 15-minutes of fame places him alongside globalism’s most infamous puppet, Barack Hussein Obama.
In The Art of War, 7th-century Chinese military strategist, Sun Tzu, teaches us that all war is deceit, and that the supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Barack Hussein Obama’s promise to fundamentally transform America is arguably the most colossal humanitarian hoax and grandest deception of globalism’s 100-year war on nation-states. His policies almost succeeded in moving America from constitutional republic to socialism––and then came President Donald J. Trump.
The globalist War on America is being fought in America, on America, by Americans. It is a war that American patriots were never supposed to win. President Donald Trump recognized how important Charlie Kirk and TPUSA were to the future of the MAGA movement and welcomed them into his reelection campaign in 2024. TPUSA brought a new generation of young Americans into the MAGA movement which also opened its tent to include an older group of disillusioned Democrats who recognized the tyranny and lies of the leftist Democrat party. President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement brought hope to Americans and restored their pride in being American.
His electrifying address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 23, 2025, stunned the world. President Trump publicly exposed the green climate change agenda with its carbon footprint as a hoax designed to redistribute manufacturing and industrial activity away from developed countries. He exposed globalism’s uncontrolled migration agenda as totally evil and then stated unequivocally that Christianity is the most persecuted religion on the planet.
The one thing President Trump missed in his extraordinary speech is that first comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. First the Jews, then the Christians. The globalist War on America is a war on the Judeo-Christian religions in America and beyond.
Globalism’s tactical divide-and-conquer strategy is targeting the foundational infrastructure of America––our Judeo-Christian tradition. If the pro-Islamist globalists can successfully create enough divisiveness between Christians and Jews worldwide to collapse the Judeo-Christian infrastructure of the United States, Canada, Western Europe, and Israel, then the foundation of Western civilization will collapse. Antisemitism is globalism’s nuclear political weapon in its war on nation-states, and declaring Palestine a nation-state is globalism’s nuclear political bomb.
Charlie Kirk wanted to bring harmony and peace to the world. He rejected violence, chaos, and deceit. His short life was a model of constructive dialogue for uniting people under the banner of faith, family, and flag. Charlie Kirk embraced the same principle of nonviolent political change as Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi––three men of peace assassinated to silence their populist message of hope and freedom.
