Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery

[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. The Hippocratic Oath is no longer applicable… They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!

Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!

If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .

RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]

DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]

Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie [1:00:59]

Premiered Aug 11, 2025

This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com

00:00 Intro

02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues

06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative

06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines

07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment

08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines

09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone

12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination

14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health

14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects

17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns

18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community

21:17 Explaining mRNA

23:45 How mRNA vaccines work

27:06 Spike protein and possible effects

30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings

32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance

33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children

34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues

39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology

42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues

45:12 History of mRNA vaccines

46:44 Modified mRNA technology

48:40 mRNA research status in 2017

49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017

49:33 Progress in mRNA technology

49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic

55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome

57:06 Doctors offering assistance

[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:

1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio

2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)

3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism

4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition

Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering

[Ed.: An Inconvenient Study Full Movie [1:20:36]

Here is the link to the documentary An Inconvenient Study, which premiered tonight at the Malibu Film Festival. It is the brilliant true story of the suppression of a vaxed vs unvaxed children’s study and the Henry Ford Health Center–suppressed because it showed over several years 3-6 TIMES the incidence of chronic illness between children who had even ONE childhood vaccine compared with children compared with children who had NO vaccines. PLUS there was ZERO autism, ADHD and a couple of other things in the unvaxed cohort.

Watch the entire video and be sure to share it with everyone you think SHOULD KNOW about what it shows!

Canadian Government Spends Millions in Tax Dollars Euthanizing Citizens Frank Bergman

November 20, 2025 Slay News

Canada’s Liberal government has poured millions of taxpayer dollars into euthanizing citizens as the nation pushes to advance the most aggressive state-run eugenics regime since the Holocaust.

The rate at which the Canadian government is expanding and normalizing euthanasia under the socialized healthcare system was exposed in explosive new documents.

Tax dollars continue pouring into the government’s “assisted suicide” program, even as Canadians struggle to access basic healthcare, wait months for treatment, and report being pressured into lethal injections because they are poor, sick, or disabled.

According to government spending figures, Canada has spent over $16 million in taxpayer money on euthanizing citizens.

However, the spending hasn’t been a one-way street.

As Slay News previously reported, the Canadian government’s socialized healthcare system saved a staggering $136 million in 2024 by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

In addition, Canada’s organ harvesting industry is now booming thanks to the surge of citizens being killed under the government’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program.

The staggering funding figures were revealed this week in a written response to Conservative MP Tamara Jansen.

They confirm that the government is bankrolling what critics are calling the most aggressive state-run euthanasia regime since the horrors of 20th-century eugenics.

Millions Spent While Healthcare Collapses

The euthanasia agenda was started in 2016 under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

The MAiD program has continued to advance under Trudeau’s successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Both Carney and Trudeau are listed as “agenda contributors” and “Young Global Leaders” by the World Economic Forum (WEF).

According to Health Minister Marjorie Michel’s official reply, the Liberals have spent more than $13 million since 2021 “administering” MAiD, plus an additional $3.4 million on research and practitioner training since 2016.

The breakdown shows a rapidly expanding program:

$763,435 (2021–22)
$3,220,911 (2022–23)
$3,296,527 (2023–24)
$3,296,527 (2024–25)
$2,644,350 (2025–26)

This explosion of government spending comes while the average wait time for basic healthcare in Canada has soared to 27.7 weeks, pushing desperate citizens to choose state-sanctioned death over life.

Government Refuses to Track How Many Request Euthanasia Due to Poverty or Lack of Care

When asked what steps the government takes to monitor cases where Canadians seek euthanasia because they cannot access mental health services, palliative care, disability support, or basic assistance, the Liberal minister flatly refused to answer.

Her response: “None of the reasons listed … are among the eligibility criteria for MAID.”

In other words: the government is not tracking it — and doesn’t intend to.

But internal medical documents tell the truth.

Doctors Admit Canadians Are Choosing Death Because They Cannot Afford to Live

Leaked Ontario physician reports from 2024 reveal the real, devastating reasons people are turning to euthanasia:

A middle-aged worker with back and ankle injuries said the lack of government support left him “with no choice but” euthanasia.

An obese woman called herself “a useless body taking up space,” and a doctor claimed obesity counted as a “grievous and irremediable” condition — justifying assisted suicide.

Others cited profound loneliness, poverty, and abandonment by the healthcare system.

Doctors have confirmed that non-terminal people are being approved for euthanasia simply because they are poor, hopeless, or feel like a burden.

Fastest-Growing Euthanasia Program in the World

Since legalization, the Trudeau government has expanded the MAID regime 13-fold, transforming Canada into the global epicenter of state-facilitated death.

Euthanasia is now:

The 6th-leading cause of death in Canada,
Accounting for 4.1% of all Canadian deaths in 2022,
With 13,241 lethal injections that year, a 31.2% increase from 2021.

Yet Statistics Canada refuses to list MAID in the country’s top 10 causes of death, claiming it categorizes “underlying illness,” not the administered lethal injection, as the primary cause.

Patients Who Refuse to Be Euthanized Are Being Shamed as “Selfish”

As healthcare deteriorates, chilling reports continue to surface of elderly and disabled Canadians being urged, pressured, and even guilted into ending their lives, including being called “selfish” for choosing to live.

For many, euthanasia isn’t a “choice.”

It is the only option the government is willing to provide.

New Fear: Canada’s Push to Euthanize Children

From our previous reporting, one of the most disturbing trends is the government’s ongoing push to expand euthanasia access to minors, including teenagers, and, in some proposals, even “mature minors” without parental consent.

Government Has Already Set the Stage

Parliament has repeatedly signaled its intent to:

Extend MAID to minors with mental illness
Consider requests from 14- to 17-year-olds
Evaluate whether parents should be notified only “when appropriate”

These discussions have been accompanied by academic papers and parliamentary committee recommendations openly arguing that youth should be able to request assisted suicide on their own.

Doctors Already Reporting Pressure on Vulnerable Teens

As we previously covered, pediatric specialists have warned of:

Clinicians “normalizing” euthanasia to depressed teens
Teens with autism or trauma being evaluated for MAID
Family members blindsided when doctors raise euthanasia during care planning

Disabled and Sick Children Are Already Being “Prepared”

Parents have come forward saying hospital social workers and mental health staff have raised MAiD during routine consultations for minors with:

Chronic illnesses
Mental health struggles
Developmental disabilities

These are vulnerable kids, not terminally ill children in agony, yet the system is slowly grooming families to accept state-assisted death as part of “care.”

Where the Agenda Heads Next

The same government that:

Spends millions expanding euthanasia
Ignores Canadians dying on waitlists
Refuses to track MAID requests tied to poverty

… is now exploring how to extend lethal injections to children.

This is the logical endpoint of the Trudeau government’s ideology:

A society where choosing death is easier and cheaper than choosing life.

A Modern Eugenics Program, Funded by Taxpayers

With millions poured into MAiD, collapsing healthcare, and growing pressure on the vulnerable, including children, critics warn Canada is no longer offering “assisted dying.”

It is administering death as a state solution.

A system this vast, this funded, and this aggressively expanded is not compassionate care.

It is policy by elimination, and the vulnerable are the ones being eliminated.

BOMBSHELL: The CDC Has Updated Its “Autism and Vaccines” Page AARON SIRI

This is a start to what honest science looks like

NOV 20, 2025

The new “Autism and Vaccines” page starts telling the truth, including:

“The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

“Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.”

“Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism. However, this statement has historically been disseminated by the CDC and other federal health agencies within HHS to prevent vaccine hesitancy.”

Meaning, the CDC has simply been lying to you. The CDC’s website then continues its mea culpa stating:

“[M]ultiple reports from HHS and the National Academy of Sciences …. have consistently concluded that there are still no studies that support the specific claim that the infant vaccines, DTaP, HepB, Hib, IPV, and PCV, do not cause autism and hence the CDC was in violation of the DQA [Data Quality Act] when it claimed, ‘vaccines do not cause autism.’ CDC is now correcting the statement, and HHS is providing appropriate funding and support for studies related to infant vaccines and autism.”

“Of note, the 2014 AHRQ [Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality] review also addressed the HepB vaccine and autism. One cross-sectional study met criteria for reliability; it found a threefold risk of parental report of autism among newborns receiving a HepB vaccine in the first month of life compared to those who did not receive this vaccine or did so after the first month.”

“In fact, there are still no studies that support the claim that any of the 20 doses of the seven infant vaccines recommended for American children before the first year of life do not cause autism. These vaccines include DTaP, HepB, Hib, IPV, PCV, rotavirus, and influenza.”

As for the MMR vaccine, CDC’s website now says:

“[I]n 2012, the IOM reviewed the published MMR-autism studies and found that all but four of them had ‘serious methodological limitations,’ and the IOM gave them no weight. The remaining four studies and a few similar studies published since also have all been criticized for serious methodological flaws. Furthermore, they are all retrospective epidemiological studies which cannot prove causation, fail to account for potential vulnerable subgroups, and fail to account for mechanistic and other evidence linking vaccines with autism.”

‘Not medicine — it’s malpractice’: Trump HHS buries child sex-change regime with damning report JOSEPH MACKINNON

NOVEMBER 20, 2025 Blaze Media

HHS just buried the notion that so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ is scientifically credible or safe.

The Department of Health and Human Services delivered what could prove to be a lethal blow this week to the profitable and predatory child sex-change industry that has been on the defensive since President Donald Trump’s Jan. 28 executive order directing all federal agencies to ensure that medical institutions receiving federal funding “end the chemical and surgical mutilation of children.”

HHS published an exhaustive peer-reviewed report on Wednesday that should make abundantly clear to those still clinging to LGBT activists’ preferred narrative about so-called “gender-affirming care” that “the harms from sex-rejecting procedures — including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical operations — are significant, long term, and too often ignored or inadequately tracked.”

“This is a new day in the Department of Health and Human Services. It’s a new day in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, a new day for the country,” Admiral Brian Christine, assistant secretary for HHS, told Blaze News. “It is because of President Trump and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that this information has come out.”

‘The HHS report should put an end to the scourge of child mutilation masquerading as health care.’

The 410-page report, titled “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices,” reads as the weightier American counterpart to Britain’s damning Cass Review, detailing:

the often glossed-over risks and medical uncertainties involved with puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-change genital mutilations;
the unscientific nature and strategic omissions of fact in the World Professional Association of Transgender Health guidelines;
the manipulation of medical definitions undertaken in service of gender ideologues’ medical agendas;
ethical concerns regarding consent for sex-change procedures as well as the regret often experienced by victims of such procedures; and
the “international retreat” from the “gender-affirming” model of care.

The report — which National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya indicated “marks a turning point for American medicine” — notes that the overall quality of evidence concerning the effects of sex-change medical interventions on long-term health, psychological outcomes, quality of life, and regret was found to be “very low.”

Accordingly, the beneficial effects alleged in the literature and often cited by gender ideologues are likely to differ substantially from the actual effects of the sex-change procedures.

‘It’s literally a billion-dollar industry. It creates lifelong customers.’

What’s more, the report noted that while the risks of child sex changes are many and unmistakable — including infertility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone density accrual, surgical complications, and heart, metabolic, and psychiatric disorders — publication bias, a failure of existing studies to adequately track and report harms, and other factors may have obfuscated the true fallout of so-called “gender-affirming care.”

The report minces no words in its conclusion, stating:

Many U.S. medical professionals and associations have fallen short of their duty to prioritize the health interests of young patients. First, there was a rapid expansion and implementation of a clinical protocol that lacked sufficient scientific and ethical justification. Second, when confronted with compelling evidence that this protocol did not deliver the health benefits it promised, and that other countries were changing their policies appropriately, U.S. medical professionals and associations failed to reconsider the “gender-affirming” approach. Third, conflicting evidence — evidence that challenged the foundational assumptions of the protocol and the professional standing of its advocates — was mischaracterized or insufficiently acknowledged. Finally, dissenting perspectives were marginalized, and those who voiced them were disparaged.

“The American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics peddled the lie that chemical and surgical sex-rejecting procedures could be good for children,” HHS Secretary Kennedy said in a statement.

“They betrayed their oath to first do no harm, and their so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ has inflicted lasting physical and psychological damage on vulnerable young people,” continued Kennedy. “That is not medicine — it’s malpractice.”

When other Western nations, Britain in particular, began to re-evaluate their barbaric medical approaches to gender dysphoria, the Biden administration and the U.S. medical establishment dug in their heels and pushed the child sex-change regime to new extremes.

For instance, Biden’s transvestic Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services Rachel Levine, formerly Richard Levine, successfully pressured WPATH to drop its recommended minimum age requirements for sex-change mutilations. His reasoning for lowering the recommended age minimums — 17 for genital mutilations, 15 for healthy breast removals, 16 for breast implants, and 14 for hormone treatments — was apparently not based on scientific evidence but on politics.

Levine’s successor, Trump HHS Assistant Secretary Brian Christine, told Blaze News, “There was absolutely an effort by the prior administration and, very specifically, an absolute effort by the individual who was the prior assistant secretary for health, Rachel Levine,” to continue politicizing children’s health.

He added that both ideology and profit prompted medical professionals and associations to similarly dig in their heels.

“It’s literally a billion-dollar industry. It creates lifelong customers,” said Christine. “You bring a little boy or a little girl in and you have them either get hormones or they get a mutilating surgery — you’ve created a lifelong customer. You’ve created someone who’s going to come back again and again and again because of surgical complications or other things going on.”

Gender dysphoria is an “emotional and mental condition,” he explained. “There’s no question about that. These individuals who truly have gender dysphoria, they suffer terribly. They deserve compassion. They deserve mental health care. What they don’t need are sex-rejecting surgeries.”

Christine said that treating gender dysphoria as a mental health condition is especially important with kids. “You should treat them with mental health care because we know that if you do, the majority of these kids, by the time they’re in their late teens, are very comfortable in their own skin,” he said.

Neeraja Deshpande, policy analyst for the Independent Women’s Forum, said that the report, “in addition to creating a more transparent system, confirms once and for all what never should have been up for debate to begin with: that so-called surgical and chemical body alteration in the name of ‘gender transition’ is a medical danger to children.”

Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project, said in a statement to Blaze News, “The HHS report should put an end to the scourge of child mutilation masquerading as health care.”

“The peer-reviewed study only confirms what the American Principles Project and anyone with common sense has known all along: The gender industrial complex relies on bad faith, bad science, and a radical ideology that places the financial interest of drug companies over those of children,” said Schilling.

Schilling suggested to Blaze News that elements within the child sex-change regime are now more likely to reap the whirlwind in court.

“This is, at a minimum, some type of consumer fraud. I do think that because of how horrific the harm that they did was that it does cross into serious criminal areas.”

While Schilling noted that the industry presently enjoys robust protection from trial attorneys and left-wing institutions, once major legal actions break through, prompting big payouts, “then you’ll have blood in the water, and the sharks will start circling.”

Schilling alluded to Chloe Cole‘s lawsuit as one such potential breakthrough action.

Cole, a detransitioner who has raised awareness across the country about the horrors and fallout of sex-change medical interventions, has sued Kaiser Permanente for alleged medical negligence in connection with the sex-rejecting procedures the health system performed on her as a minor.

Schilling commended the numerous experts who put their names to the report — including doctors and scientists from the Baylor College of Medicine, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Duke University — stating, “They’re very courageous for doing this. This is a very powerful and embedded industry that’s been doing really big and terrible things in the country … and for these guys to put their names behind it is a very big deal.”

When asked whether this report ultimately amounts to a lethal blow against the sex-change regime, HHS Assistant Secretary Christine told Blaze News, “Yeah, we certainly hope so. We certainly believe it will be. Listen, our job in the administration is to protect our children, protect our citizens. Our job is to produce gold-standard science. That’s exactly what we have done. It’s exactly what we’re doing.”

Where Does the CDC’s Dishonesty Come From? A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR

Is a new era at last is dawning at the CDC?

NOV 20, 2025

Story at a Glance:

•The widespread promotion of vaccination is predicated upon having profound benefits and no risks. As vaccines frequently injure their recipients, sustaining this paradigm requires suppressing all evidence of vaccine harm and psychologically programming vaccine supporters to be incapable of seeing injuries all around them.

•Because of this, Senator Ron Johnson held a historic Senate hearing where discarded individuals with vaccine injuries could testify on their injuries.

•The CDC has consistently used its authority to promote vaccination and support industry (e.g., soft drinks or lucrative therapeutics).

•In many cases, these promotions have been directly tied to the CDC taking money from industry. Unfortunately, despite both CDC employees and members of Congress demanding investigations, the matter has been largely swept under the rug.

•The CDC delegates vaccine recommendations to an impartial panel of (paid-off) experts who consistently support vaccination. Recently, RFK Jr. replaced them with scientists free of conflicts of interest.

•At the first ACIP meeting, the CDC repeated its existing playbook, both making a number of truly remarkable statements defending the COVID vaccine at odds with public data, while simultaneously admitting they did not know numerous fundamental questions about the COVID vaccines that should have been figured out years ago.

•Fortunately, times have changed, and many immediately saw these lies for what they were. Likewise, yesterday, the CDC made a historic pivot on a longstanding lie and acknowledged stating “vaccines do not cause autism” is a falsehood not supported by the existing evidence.

One of my major questions in life is whether the bad things that happen are a result of a secretive group of bad actors or are simply a naturally emergent phenomenon that would occur regardless of which group was in power behind the scenes.

On one hand, I frequently see policies be enacted in a coordinated fashion that lead to a clear outcome, and then watch as the years play out, that every institution works in unison to ensure that outcome comes to pass, and as such, when I see the opening moves, I tend to assume the ultimate outcome will follow (which, for example, is why I knew there would be vaccine mandates at the start of 2021 and why Obama’s wars would lead to a permanent unsustainable flood of immigrants into Europe).

On the other hand, when I speak to the most informed people within the government, I hear things like this:

You can always point a finger at a specific agency or person, but the reality is that as the government gets bigger and bigger, more and more fiefdoms will emerge within it, and those groups will fight for their own interests at the expense of everyone else.

Note: many Federal agencies depend on obtaining congressional funding and, therefore, will engage in stunts to ensure that funding is allocated to them. For example, the CDC will routinely hype up inconsequential “pandemics” each year, as this nationwide drama allows them to obtain more funding.

Can Artificial Intelligence Practice Medicine? PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Basic records fetching, assembly, and presentation required well before assisting in diagnosis and treatment.

NOV 20, 2025

A new paper landed in my inbox today titled: Software as a Medical Practitioner—Is It Time to License Artificial Intelligence? by Bressman et al from Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. The paper tackles the usual questions of licensing, responsibility, and liability as it applies to software tools used in clinical practice.

No doubt artificial intelligence is playing an ever-increasing role in medicine. From my perspective this paper speculates on a late step in the evolution of AI, not the first steps. Here is what Bressman et al is missing for AI:

Obtaining permission for record gathering from disparate health systems, clinics, labs and imaging services
Assembly of all information into a personal health timeline
Creation, registration, and patient set up of electronic medical records
Structured interviews
Synthesis of information for presentation to doctor or other healthcare provider

It’s important that AI enthusiasts to remain grounded in the very basic blocking and tackling in medicine. So far not a single AI program has proposed yet accomplished these five tasks in their entirety.

Canadian Government Forcing Doctors to Euthanize Treatable Patients Frank Bergman

November 18, 2025

Canada’s euthanasia regime is spiraling out of control, and now frontline doctors are coming forward with chilling warnings that the government is railroading treatable patients into “assisted suicide” instead of care.

Several doctors have come forward to lift the lid on the new protocols from Health Canada, the government’s taxpayer-funded healthcare system, that steer patients into the “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program.

In a new exposé by filmmaker Frank Panico, three Canadian doctors blow the whistle on the government’s pressure to push patients into “choosing” euthanasia over more expensive treatments under the nation’s socialized healthcare system.

As Slay News has previously reported, the government is now Canadian government is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

Since euthanasia was first legalized under the Trudeau government in 2016, doctors have come under increasing pressure to relieve the burden on the healthcare system by killing patients.

Dr. Will Johnston of Vancouver, Dr. David D’Souza of Toronto, and Dr. Catherine Ferrier of Montreal revealed that federal protocols now require doctors to discuss euthanasia with vulnerable patients, presenting state-sanctioned death as a “treatment option.”

D’Souza, a family physician and pain specialist, warned that the government’s push is directly influencing patient decisions.

“If a physician is suggesting euthanasia as an option or a treatment option for their pain or their suffering, then that is a very serious thing,” D’Souza said.

“As a patient is more likely to take this option given that a health professional has suggested it.

“I think it does severe harm to the doctor-patient relationship when physicians are now allowed and even suggesting euthanasia as a means to end their suffering.”

His warning centers around Health Canada’s 2023 “Model Practice Standard for Medical Assistance in Dying.”

The guidelines mandate doctors and nurses to pressure patients into “choosing” euthanasia while discussing care, effectively redefining suicide as medicine.

The guideline states practitioners “must take reasonable steps to ensure persons are informed of the full range of treatment options,” explicitly including MAiD.

However, in many cases, patients are being denied access to treatments, leaving them with no other option than to “choose” euthanasia.

“Promises were lies — now doctors are being coerced”

Dr. Johnston, head of British Columbia’s Euthanasia Resistance Coalition, said the new regime breaks every promise Canadians were given when euthanasia was legalized.

“Promises were made that no doctor would ever be coerced to participate in euthanasia, no doctor or nurse would ever lose their job because they wouldn’t cooperate with euthanasia,” Johnston said.

“All of that was a complete fiction. All of those things have now happened.”

Johnston described a system where hospitals, nursing homes, and even palliative care units are being forced to host euthanasia killings, something the government originally insisted would never occur.

Doctors pushing death, not treatment

Montreal geriatric specialist Dr. Catherine Ferrier shared her own disturbing experience: doctors aggressively promoting MAID to a family member with brain cancer.

The first doctor gave him only two options: euthanasia or palliative sedation.

The doctor provided no psychological, social, or restorative alternatives, despite the patient’s vulnerable state.

Ferrier said even the psychiatrist referral focused solely on determining whether the patient was “competent” to choose euthanasia, not on helping him live.

“These two doctors were guys his age, and I’m convinced that they looked at him and said: ‘I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes so he’s better off dead,’” Ferrier said.

Disabled Canadians: Pressured to die because life is “too expensive”

The whistleblowers echoed recent revelations from Inclusion Canada CEO Krista Carr, who confirmed that disabled Canadians are being pushed toward euthanasia during routine appointments.

Her claims match leaked internal reports from Ontario doctors showing:

• Patients are euthanized because they can’t afford to live

• Individuals opting for death due to loneliness, poverty, or lack of home care

• Providers labeling obesity as a “grievous and irremediable” condition to justify euthanasia

• Injured workers told financial hardship “left them with no choice” but euthanasia

One case involved an obese woman who called herself a “useless body taking up space,” which a doctor claimed qualified her for euthanasia on medical grounds.

Canada’s euthanasia explosion: a global outlier

Since Trudeau’s Liberal government expanded MAiD, Canada has become home to the world’s fastest-growing euthanasia program, now 13 times larger than when it began.

Wait times for actual healthcare now average 27.7 weeks, driving desperate citizens to seek death instead of care.

Some elderly and disabled Canadians who refuse euthanasia say they’ve even been called “selfish” for choosing to live.

Euthanasia is now Canada’s sixth-leading cause of death.

However, Statistics Canada does not list it as such because it records the underlying illness, not the lethal injection, as the cause.

The numbers paint a grim picture

Health Canada confirmed 13,241 euthanasia deaths in 2022, a staggering 4.1% of all deaths, and a 31% jump from 2021.

And doctors warn that unless Canadians confront what’s happening, the trend will only accelerate.

The whistleblowers are sounding the alarm, warning that MAiD has gone from “rare and exceptional” to a government-backed shortcut for suffering, poverty, disability, and medical burnout.

“Assisted suicide” has now become a lethal substitute for actual care.

In a country where patients are waiting months for treatment but can receive euthanasia approval in days, the message is unmistakable:

Canada’s healthcare system is no longer saving lives; it’s eliminating the people who need it.

[Ed.: The Hippocratic Oath is no longer applicable…]

BREAKING NEWS: They killed Scott Adams. WILLIAM MAKIS

The Cancer Drug Cartel sacrificed Scott Adams at the altar of Big Pharma.

NOV 18, 2025 – On Nov.2, 2025, suffering from terminal Stage 4 Prostate Cancer, Scott Adams reached out to President Trump for help.

Many answered his call including:

RFK Jr (Head of HHS)
Don Jr (Trump’s son)
President Trump
Dan Scavino Jr
and many, many others including myself

Within a couple of days, Scott was getting cutting edge cancer care from the best that mainstream Oncology has to offer.

Scott Received Pluvicto (Keiser) + Anktiva (Bioshield)

They killed him.

They let the Cancer Drug Cartel get its hands on him and they sacrificed him at the altar of Big Pharma.

The irony here is: I helped develop and pioneer Pluvicto.

Pluvicto is a targeted Radiation therapy using the beta emitter Lutetium-177 (I have a dozen world first publications on Lutetium-177).

My work on Pluvicto technology is the entire reason why my medical license was ever attacked by Canadian authorities to begin with.

Pluvicto is great. FDA sat on the technology 20 years and wouldn’t approve it, afraid it would compete with chemo.

Novartis scooped up a $20 mil start-up that owned Pluvicto for $2 billion and bought the rights to Pluvicto.

Pluvicto is now a $100,000 to $150,000 treatment (I was giving it for free, which is why they still hold my medical license hostage).

Scott Adams got the wrong treatment

Pluvicto is not strong (that’s why Scott tells you he will need 6 treatments).

You give it much earlier, when the tumor burden is not that high.

It’s simply not strong enough for Scott’s current cancer situation.

So what is ANKTIVA?

Billionaire doctor Dr.Pat Soon-Shiong was made recently famous by Tucker Carlson.

Dr.Pat owns Bioshield which makes Anktiva, an immune infusion that stimulates NK-cells and T-cells to multiply. Anktiva is supposed to stimulate the immune system to attack the cancer better.

But there is a problem.

Scott Adams is severely COVID-19 Vaccine Injured.

We know the COVID-19 jabs damage the immune system.

Scott Adams’ T-cells and NK-cells are damaged. You can’t multiply damaged cells.

These T-cells and NK-cells may also be producing the spike protein and you will now potentially multiply cells that will produce MORE carcinogenic spike protein.

Did Dr.Pat test Scott Adams for spike protein production? Of course not.

Did Dr.Pat test Scott Adams’ T-Cells or NK-cells for function or spike? Of course not.

He just gave Scott Adams the Anktiva blindly.

So Scott got:

PLUVICTO + ANKTIVA = TOO WEAK + POTENTIAL DISASTER (MORE SPIKE)

Scott Adams had much better options

I offered much better options to Scott.

Pluvicto + Ivermectin + Mebendazole
Chemo + Ivermectin + Mebendazole

Both options had FAR HIGHER chance of success. Why?

Both Ivermectin and Mebendazole act as RADIOSENSITIZERS. So they would have sensitized Scott’s cancer cells to be better killed by PLUVICTO. Much higher chance of success than he has now.

Both Ivermectin and Mebendazole act as CHEMOSENSITIZERS. They would have sensitized Scott’s cancer cells to be better killed by Chemo and would have also reversed any chemo resistance that Scott may have developed.

Both choices were infinitely better than what he got.

I reached out to MAHA and MAGA. NO ONE ANSWERED.

Try Ivermectin and let the world see it?

They would rather kill you instead.

So that’s what they did.

And it makes me sick to watch it unfold.

=====

Dr.Pat Soon-Shiong is a billionaire who owns the LA Times.

He partnered with Peter Hotez to produce a “low cost” COVID-19 Vaccine.

Peter Hotez is a Big Pharma Vaccine High Priest who pushed contaminated, cancer causing COVID-19 Vaccines aggressively during the past 5 years.

PLAGUE of CORRUPTION – Liam Neeson Narrates the Investigation – 80 years of Deception – Full video [1:25:28]

November 16, 2025 Amigo Studios

BREAKING STUDY: Anomalous Amyloid Microclots Found in 100% of the COVID-19 Vaccinated Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

In a cohort that was 94% vaccinated, every participant had amyloid microclots —the same pathology behind the large white fibrous clots now being pulled from corpses worldwide.

NOV 17, 2025

A new peer-reviewed study has quietly revealed one of the most consequential biological findings of the pandemic era — and the authors never acknowledge it: Every single vaccinated participant in the study had fibrinolysis-resistant, ThT-positive amyloid microclots circulating in their blood.

Hidden in the supplementary tables is a demographic and biochemical pattern that completely reframes the paper:

94% of all participants were vaccinated.
100% of these vaccinated individuals had amyloid microclots — including every “healthy control.”

The condition labeled “Long COVID” occurred almost entirely in a heavily vaccinated population, without any laboratory confirmation of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. In reality, the study is observing Long VACCINE pathology, not Long COVID.

And because the authors’ own mechanistic experiments show that purified spike protein alone produces these amyloid, fibrinolysis-resistant clots, the implications are profound.

All individuals in the study — 100% of the vaccinated — had amyloid microclots

Researchers identified microclots using Thioflavin-T (ThT), an amyloid-binding fluorogenic dye. ThT positivity was the defining criterion. A structure was only counted as a microclot if it bound ThT.

Therefore, every microclot counted in the study is, by definition, amyloidogenic.

And according to Table S11, every single vaccinated participant had amyloid microclots in multiple size ranges:

Because 83 of 88 participants (94%) were vaccinated, this means:

Every vaccinated person in the study had amyloid microclots.

“Long COVID” (Long VACCINE) patients had extreme elevations in large, pathological amyloid microclots

Small amyloid microclots were present in everyone, but the pathological burden differed sharply.

According to Table S11:

98% of “Long COVID” (Long VACCINE) patients had large microclots in the 900–1600 µm² range
60% had very large microclots >1600 µm²
Total microclot burden was ~20-fold higher in “Long COVID” patients

These larger, pathogenic amyloid microclots were densely packed with:

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)
Myeloperoxidase
Neutrophil elastase
Extracellular DNA
Misfolded amyloid fibrin

COVID-19 infection was never verified

Despite positioning the results as a hallmark of “Long COVID,” none of the participants were confirmed to have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study performed:

no antibody testing
no PCR
no sequencing
no neutralizing antibody assays

Long COVID status was assigned purely via symptoms and clinician impression. There is no evidence in the study that any participant was biologically positive for prior infection.

Thus, the clotting abnormalities cannot be attributed specifically to infection, but rather to vaccination.

Spike protein alone produced identical amyloid microclots

In a mechanistic experiment, the authors added purified spike protein to fibrinogen.

This single intervention produced:

insoluble, ThT-positive amyloid microclots
misfolded fibrin structures identical to those in patient samples
fibrinolysis-resistant aggregates compatible with vessel obstruction

The authors confirmed that Spike protein directly induces amyloid microclot formation, corroborating previous studies.

Explains prevalent white fibrous clots found in the dead

The study’s core findings — 100% amyloid microclots in vaccinated individuals and direct spike-induced amyloid fibrin formation — offer a clear mechanism for the large, rubbery white fibrous clots increasingly reported in deceased individuals since 2021.

At the 2025 Tennessee Funeral Directors Association (TFDA) convention, former USAF Major Tom Haviland conducted the first state-level survey of embalmers:

64% reported white fibrous clots in 2025
Found in 17% of all bodies
70% observed widespread microclotting (“coffee-grounds blood”)
39% reported rising infant deaths (+14%)

BREAKING: Tennessee Funeral Directors Association Confirms White Fibrous Clots Are Real and Prevalent NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH JUN 16 Read full story

Forensic analysis by Kevin W. McCairn, PhD et al shows that these postmortem clots:

are amyloidogenic fibrin aggregates, not normal thrombi
exhibit β-sheet structures (ThT-positive)
are protease-resistant, rubbery, and fibrous
have dense fibrillar ultrastructure on SEM
contain human genetic material
and show preliminary plasmid/spike-associated markers

These characteristics match exactly the pathological microclots described in the new study — only at a later, aggregated, end-stage form.

The progression is biologically straightforward:

Spike exposure (infection or mRNA vaccination)
Amyloid microclots form — present in 100% of vaccinated subjects
Large, NET-rich, fibrinolysis-resistant clots accumulate (20× higher in Long vaccine patients)
These merge into massive, rubbery, white fibrous intravascular clots

This new study documents the early and intermediate stages in the living; Haviland’s surveys and McCairn’s analysis reveals the final stage in the dead.

Conclusions

Although the authors frame their findings as “Long COVID,” the underlying data reveal something far more consequential:

100% of vaccinated participants had amyloid microclots.
Large, fibrinolysis-resistant amyloid microclots were concentrated in the Long vaccine group.
No participant had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Spike protein alone produced identical amyloid microclots in vitro.
With 94% vaccination uptake, the biological signal is overwhelmingly linked to spike exposure in a vaccinated population.

These findings carry serious public-health implications:

Every vaccinated individual in the study showed early-stage amyloid microclots, raising alarms about cumulative vascular injury across the entire globe.
The pathology mirrors the large white fibrous clots now documented by embalmers and forensic analysts.

And critically:

The CDC and federal public-health agencies must finally do their job and launch an immediate, transparent investigation into these findings.
Failing to intestigate the white fibrous clot situation constitutes a dereliction of duty.
Any platform delivering spike protein into human circulation must be immediately banned for human use.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

[Ed.: Amyloids are abnormal protein aggregates that can form in the body, often leading to diseases known as amyloidosis. These aggregates disrupt normal organ function and can be associated with conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Wikipedia]

The Subversives in Our Midst

November 17, 2025 Brownstone Institute

This past week, Brownstone Institute foiled a major plot against health freedom that had been ongoing for at least six weeks and was likely funded at the highest levels. The scheme was to fob off a major piece of fake science while bamboozling leaders in health freedom into believing it was real. The plan was to deploy emails, interviews, and videos designed to discredit the scientific prowess of major leaders, including Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

They did not get away with it. The story of how all of this unfolded, including a direct confrontation with the team of pranksters, is below.

There are larger lessons. First, yes, the bad guys are out to get us – out to get you. Second, what they fear more than anything is the deployment of expertise that exposes them and their fakery. Third, the best method of fighting back is to rally around the integrity of research, analysis, and journalism.

Brownstone Institute has worked for years to build a community of resistance and truth. This is precisely why we have become a leading target of the establishment that gave us lockdowns, mandates, surveillance, and soul-crushing despotism.

Why are the bad guys so worried? Because noncompliance is growing and threatening their power. Trust in the medical systems – and the machinery surrounding that including journals, academia, and media – is in free fall. Meanwhile, it appears that Obamacare is imploding in real time.

Huge changes are necessary now. Brownstone’s work is central to providing guidance.

Our work must continue and grow. It can only do so with your support. Please consider a generous donation so we can continue to back top researchers and writers, expand the network of supper clubs, publish books that are rocking the debate, and serve as an effective foil to scientific corruption and attacks on truth.

On Wednesday, November 19th, the famous Brownstone West Hartford Supper Club is pleased to welcome Alex Sullivan, author of She Didn’t Start the Fire: The True Story of One Mother’s Journey from Apolitical to Activist. She co-founded New Canaan Unplugged, a parent-led initiative helping families cultivate a more mindful relationship with technology. Get tickets here.

On Tuesday, December 2nd, the Brownstone Greater Boston Supper Club welcomes Dr. Adam Urato, a Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialist. Adam has taken a leading role in opposing ineffective drugs and harmful approaches to care in pregnancy and is currently petitioning the FDA to add a boxed warning to SSRIs regarding pregnancy risks. Get tickets here.

On Monday, December 8th, the Brownstone Midwest Supper Club welcomes Ann Kreilkamp, who will share the remarkable journey of creating Green Acres Village, a thriving community nestled in the heart of suburban Bloomington. Ann will walk you through how she conceived and built this unique neighborhood, where three homes with gardens, a shared compost area, greenhouse, chicken coop, patio, and community stage come together as a living laboratory for intentional, regenerative living. Get tickets here.

On Thursday, December 11th, the inaugural Brownstone Austin Supper Club welcomes Jackie Schlegel, Founder and Executive Director of Texans for Medical Freedom. Her success in relationship-building laid the foundation for the 2025 legislative session—where Texans for Medical Freedom passed five of its eight priority bills, marking a historic victory for medical freedom in Texas. Get tickets here.

Here is some content since our last email.

Why ObamaCare Is Failing and How to Replace It By Michael Walters. Its architects meant to appeal to the public, promising what the old system could not fully deliver – guaranteed access to affordable health cover and coverage for pre-existing conditions (PECs). But they were wrong about being able to keep your doctor.

Was Covid Always a CIA Plot? By Brownstone Institute. Where are the investigations, hearings, commissions, and courts? Baric and members of the Intelligence Community must testify under oath about their role in gain-of-function research, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the cover-up that began in 2020.

Administration Announces Vague Help for Ranchers By Meryl Nass. By relaxing USDA regulations and allowing the states to use their own inspectors to inspect “custom” meat processing facilities (which are currently not allowed to sell meat but only process it for personal use), this bottleneck could be eased quickly.

Murray Rothbard Unpacks the Meatpacking Myth By Brownstone Institute. The usual story of the nation’s first major food safety regulation posits a corrupt industry cleaned up by government. The deeper history offers a different story of an industry in trouble with consumers that went to government to shore up its market share.

The Grapes of Wrath By Charles Eisenstein. Politics is a lagging indicator of consciousness. Maybe the consciousness behind organic, regenerative, and permaculture practices—tracing a lineage from indigenous and traditional roots through Steinbeck and Steiner—is strong enough now to alter the soulless juggernaut of agricultural policy.

Exposed: The Hoax That Targeted Health Freedom By Jeffrey Tucker. It’s a dangerous world. No question that Brownstone Institute was on the target list, maybe at the top of the list. That such an elaborate and well-funded scheme was hatched in the first place proves we are over the target.

The Unmasking of Vaccine Science By Maryanne Demasi. This is not conjecture or conspiracy — it is sworn testimony. Now, as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. reopens long-dismissed questions about aluminium adjuvants and the absence of long-term safety studies, Plotkin’s once-untouchable legacy is beginning to fray.

Escape the Digital Purse Seine By Lori Weintz. Like Fortunato, will we walk willingly into our demise because we can’t imagine the evil intent of others? Will we go along with digital ID or biometric scans because we want to travel in Europe or take that next cruise?

2025’s Top Selling Pharmaceutical Drugs Contain Gene Deleting CRISPR Nanotech – Part 1 DR. ARIYANA LOVE

“If the Nuremberg laws were applied, every post war American president would have been hanged.” – Naom Chomsky

NOV 16, 2025

Before COVID-19 (Event 201), pharmaceutical drugs had an overall 90% failure rate. The Rockefeller system of medicine has never been an efficient choice for healing.

With the advent of COVID-19, pharmaceutical companies have made a killing. They profited in the billions from their Covid-19 vaccines, while profiting even more from the treatments offered for the vaccine-induced injuries.

VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency), turbo cancers, and blood clots are a few of the top adverse reactions caused by Covid-19 vaccines, with a slew of other adverse events that Big Pharma is monopolizing on. They’ve quietly snuck weaponized nanotechnology into all their latest drugs, replacing the old ones with unapproved gene therapies. Too many people continue to fall for their scams.

Medical doctors receive financial incentives to prescribe the latest pharmaceutical drug. They don’t bother or can’t read medical patents, to learn about the drugs they’re prescribing to patients. Instead, they follow the digital platforms and educational materials offered by pharmaceutical companies. Medical doctors are intelligent people, but they remain largely clueless about the nanotechnology they’re delivering to patients and the catastrophic consequences to human health.

I am now going to demonstrate how all the top-selling pharmaceutical drugs in 2025 contain unapproved, gene-altering mRNA and DARPA’s CRISPR nanotech.

[Ed.:

Canadians Forced into ‘Choosing’ Euthanasia After Being Denied Treatments Frank Bergman

November 16, 2025

Canada’s spiraling euthanasia system is once again under fire as heartbreaking new accounts reveal that a surging number of patients are being forced into “choosing” the government’s “assisted suicide” death program after being denied actual medical care under the nation’s collapsing socialized healthcare model.

An alarming number of Canadians are reporting that they have no other choice but to agree to be euthanized by the government, despite the supposed availability of treatments for their conditions.

As Slay News has previously reported, the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year.

In 2024, the government saved over $136 million by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

The latest chilling case to emerge is that of 84-year-old Cleo Gratton, a retired diamond driller from Chelmsford, Ontario.

Gratton’s story is sending shockwaves across the country.

He died earlier this month of natural causes, but only after being approved for the government’s “assisted suicide” scheme.

His family says the approval came directly after an appalling hospital experience that left him convinced death was preferable to returning to the facility.

Gratton suffered from heart disease and kidney failure.

But instead of receiving dignified care during a recent hospital stay, the CBC reports he spent a night in an emergency room, only to be transferred to a hallway on the seventh floor.

The taxpayer-funded doctors refused to give him the care he needed and convinced him that euthanasia would better serve the greater good.

“There were no lights; all the bulbs in that hallway had been completely removed,” his daughter Lynn said.

“Patients are passing by, nurses are going by, no privacy, no compassion, no dignity.”

She added that nurses had to use headlamps just to examine his feet.

The conditions were so degrading that Gratton told his family he would “rather die than go back.” Days later, he applied for MAiD — Canada’s euthanasia program now infamous for replacing care with chemical death.

Before his natural passing, Gratton pleaded with his family to expose what he endured: “Push, push, push for change… Make people aware of what’s going on.”

His family is honoring that wish.

A Pattern of Patients Being Denied Care — but Approved for Death

Gratton’s story is only the latest in a staggering pattern: Canadians who want medical treatment, home care, or palliative support are being told the only available option is assisted suicide.

Slay News has been tracking these cases for years, and they’re accelerating:

• Norman Meunier (Quebec): A quadriplegic man who developed severe bedsores after being left on an ER stretcher for four days without a proper mattress. Overwhelmed and denied home care, he “chose” MAiD last year.

• “Mrs. B” (Ontario): An 80-year-old woman denied hospice and palliative care. After her spouse became overwhelmed, she was assessed for MAiD and lethally injected shortly after.

• Sathya Dhara Khovac (Winnipeg): A 44-year-old woman who repeatedly begged for home care resources but was refused. In her obituary, she wrote she “could have had more time” if she’d been given help. Instead, she was euthanized in 2022.

• Sean Tagert (B.C.): A 41-year-old father who battled the system for years to receive home care that would allow him to remain close to his son. Unable to secure the support he needed, he felt he had “no other choice” but euthanasia in 2019.

• Canadian veterans: A recent testimony revealed a surging number of veterans are being offered MAiD instead of the mental health support they requested.

These aren’t isolated incidents, however.

They’re a systemic feature of a government-run system using euthanasia as a cost-saving pressure valve for an overstretched and underfunded healthcare bureaucracy.

A Healthcare System Pushing Vulnerable Toward Death

Even as Gratton’s family praised the individual doctors and nurses, who they said are overworked and stretched thin, they warned that the system itself is failing.

“Why are they still taking in patients if we have an overcrowding issue and they have no place to put these people?” Lynn asked.

The answer is becoming clearer:

The system has an escape hatch after legalizing euthanasia.

Rather than investing in long-term care, home care, mental health support, or palliative medicine, Canada’s government has built the world’s most aggressive assisted suicide regime.

And it is increasingly used on the elderly, the disabled, the poor, and those simply unable to access basic support.

With the government pushing to expand MAiD to include mental illness, critics warn the system will shift from crisis to catastrophe.

Euthanasia Has Become the Default Option, Not the Last Resort

In a civilized society, assisted suicide would be a tragic last resort.

In Canada, it is becoming a routine substitute for care.

The chilling reality is that the Liberal Canadian government now sees “assisted suicide” as:

A cost-saving mechanism.
A release valve for a failing system.
A quiet way to disappear the vulnerable.

This is not compassion.

It’s coercion through neglect.

And unless Canadians demand change, the stories will only grow more frequent and more horrifying.

Why Have Vaccines Become a Religion? A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR

How vaccines became the holy water of Western civilization

NOV 16, 2025

As more and more people are awakening to the dangers of vaccines, they are gradually discovering a problem vaccine safety advocates have had to deal with for decades—talking to vaccine zealots is like speaking to a brick wall and regardless of the evidence you put forward, can’t reach them (sometimes seeming as though you are speaking to a religious fanatic who is unwilling to even consider the “blasphemy you are spewing forth”).

For example, in 2009 after nephrologist Dr. Suzanne Humphries noticed patients (particularly hospitalized ones) kept on developing kidney failure after flu shots, she experienced significant pushback from trying to delay vaccinating until discharge:

In the past when I was consulted on kidney failure cases and said, “Oh that was the statin/antibiotic/diuretic that did that!” instantly the drug would be stopped—no questions asked. Now, however, a new standard was applied to vaccines. It didn’t matter that the internist’s notes in the charts said, “No obvious etiology of kidney failure found after thorough evaluation.”

The next time the medical chief of staff and I met in the corridor, an oncologist was present. At one point, I asked the chief, “Why doesn’t anyone else see the problem here? Why is it just me? How can you think all this is okay? Why is it now considered normal to vaccinate very sick people on their first hospital day?” The oncologist gave an answer that surprised me. She said, “Medical religion!” and turned and walked away.

Several months went by, and the medical executive committee met to discuss my concerns, without allowing me to be present at the meeting. I was informed in writing that the nursing staff were becoming confused by me discontinuing orders to vaccinate and that I should adhere to hospital policy. I thought this odd, given that nurses are not accustomed to giving the same treatment to every patient, and are fully capable of reading individualized orders.

As time went on, it was interesting seeing the divide in the hospital staff. Nurses would bail me up in quiet corners and tell me stories that completely backed up what I was seeing. They would guardedly support me, when their superiors were out of eye- or ear-shot.

I wrote all the cases out and put together a comprehensive brief for the hospital administration, but to no avail. Not even science could get through as the snake-oil salesmen continued to deny my findings.

I kept presenting the administration with facts they could not respond to, in the hope that they would get a blinding revelation of the obvious. Finally, they recruited the Northeast Healthcare Quality Foundation, the “quality improvement organization” for Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, to get me off their backs. Dr. Lawrence D. Ramunno sent a letter invoking the fallacy of authority, which adamantly informed me that hospital vaccination against influenza virus would become a global measure for all admissions in 2010 [due to Obamacare], and that my evidence of harm was not significant because 10 professional organizations endorse vaccination.

This condescending, vapid letter…illustrated callous disregard of clinicians at the highest level, and the willful blindness prepared to ignore clearly documented cases, and their own medical literature. Not satisfied with demanding that I practice automaton obedience to dictates from on high, they initiated a shadow observation, where everything I did and wrote in the hospital, from then on, was observed and scrutinized.

Note: prior to Obamacare effectively mandating flu shots for healthcare workers, many doctors I knew did not vaccinate as they felt there were negligible benefits to the shot and real potential risks and thought the new mandate didn’t make sense. I do not believe my sample was biased as other sources corroborated it (e.g., this 2009 CNN segment discussed New York healthcare workers protesting a state law requiring annual flu shots for them)—making it remarkable how quickly a simple mandate was able to shift critical thinking on this topic to an irrational embrace of vaccination (especially given how people I’ve met who got Guillain-Barré syndrome from a vaccine).

Bio-Digital Vaccine Passports and ‘On Patient Medical Recordkeeping’: Nic Hulscher [1:13:34]

November 16, 2025 FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

Colleagues and Readers,

Please watch this important interview, where we take a deep dive into the Gates-funded microneedle patch implants engineered to embed long-lasting quantum dots in the body — a technology now being rapidly advanced as the foundation for biological vaccine passports.

WATCH

“Once this is in you… they have you controlled and that’s it basically.”

Did you know that the only safe medical data is data that is stored inside your own body?

I didn’t know that either until Nic Hulscher recently discovered some very interesting research papers about ‘On Patient Medical Recordkeeping’ technology.

The quote below is from an article that was published in PubMed six years ago, in December 2019: “Accurate medical recordkeeping is a major challenge in many low-resource settings where well-maintained centralized databases do not exist, contributing to 1.5 million vaccine-preventable deaths annually.”

It took humans several hundred years to figure out that we are not able to maintain accurate medical records, but now we finally know.

And it’s a lucky thing that we only figured this out now, because we are finally reaching the stage where we are able to reliably record medical data: by encoding them into every living human body – in particular data about received vaccines.

There’s even a cute – no, more than cute: a heart warming acronym for this brilliant new record keeping method: OPMR.

The following quote is from an article in ‘Nature Materials’ from February 2025:

“We developed a robust on-patient medical record-keeping (OPMR) technology using a dissolvable microneedle patch (MNP) that delivers a quantum dot (QD)-based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye encapsulated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microparticles into the skin to encode medical information. This dye, once deposited into the dermis, is invisible to the naked eye, offering patient data privacy and anonymity, but provides discrete NIR signals that can be detected using a NIR imaging system.”

Isn’t it wonderful that we have found a way to not only make it impossible to lose medical records but to keep our medical records truly private and anonymous – and especially the number of vaccine microneedle patches we got administered? Nobody will ever know – except all the folks who detect the oh so discrete Near Infrared signals with the help of the NIR imaging system. And maybe it won’t be folks much longer who detect them but some friendly AI agent. Which makes it even more sublime.

We can also stop stressing about our medical records being unavailable when China or some other country cuts the subsea cables to crash the internet:

“By depositing the dye in a predefined pattern that correlates to a specific set of information, the technology can be imaged by healthcare workers to support next-dose decisions without requiring internet connectivity or the use of centralized databases.”

See? Internet connectivity is not required. Marvelous. Life-saving ‘next-dose decisions’ won’t be blocked ever – internet or not.

And in case you were wondering whether our scientists remembered to cover the social justice angle, do not fear: “This technology could help healthcare workers make informed decisions in circumstances where reliable record-keeping is unavailable, thus contributing to global healthcare equity.”

A big thank you to the wonderful people at HHS, NIH, the Koch institute and of course the Gates Foundation whose grant monies made it possible for brave scientists to develop this magnificent new record keeping method. Honestly, where would we be without our dear federal health agencies and the fabulous Gates Foundation?

And they understand that only the best is good enough for us:

“To enable the OPMR [On Patient Medical Record] with excellent information capacity, security and reliability, we designed the MNP [Micro Needle Patch] architecture and administration for consistent and optimal data transfer and longevity; achieved an information capacity of billions of encoded patterns using an error correcting code; and developed a temporally and spatially reliable information retrieval system using machine learning.”

An information capacity of billions of encoded patterns – and with an error correcting code! The scientists deserve not just one, but at least two Freedom Medals, maybe more. And the LLMs can finally gorge themselves on data again, just when we thought we were running out.

But, wait, it gets more sumptuous: these superb microneedles are not only carrying the dye for imprinting a digital code into the body but they carry a second payload. Maybe you can guess what that payload might be?

EXACTLY! It’s an mRNA vaccine. Now that’s a dream come true. No more painful vaccine injections, the long needles replaced with eensy weensy ones. Infants and toddlers won’t even know they’re being vaccinated.

This is what the February 2025 article says:

“We optimize the microneedle design for both a reliable delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and the near-infrared fluorescent microparticles that encode the on-patient medical record-keeping… Long-term studies in a swine model demonstrate the safety, efficacy and reliability of this approach for the co-delivery of on-patient medical record-keeping and the mRNA vaccine encoding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).”

Superb. We all know about the safety and efficacy of the amazing mRNA vaccines and to have them co-delivered straight into our bodies in tandem with our precious medical data is a stroke of genius.

This elegant new technology will not only turn us into walking bio-digital vaccine passports that will be biosensed by deep learning-based image processing agents, but – even more delicious – we will be loaded with the newest and best mRNA vaccines the science has to offer.

How exactly does this biosensing work you want to know? It’s simple and can be done from a smartphone:

“An Android smartphone application ‘IR Record’ was custom developed to capture the OPMR NIR dye signal and can save images. The software is designed to take 30 consecutive images with six different exposure settings and five different gain settings. This bracket scanning method allows the capture of NIR signals with varying intensities over time. Among the 30 images, one image with the best reading results gets automatically chosen and processed.”

Five different gain settings and six (!) different exposure settings! Now you can start scanning yourself first thing in the morning to get your day off to a good start. That’s what I call resilience.

The researchers also note: “In cases of emergency like in a pandemic or natural disaster, or at refugee or military camps, OPMR patches can be administered on-demand.” And not only administered, but possibly self-administered.

Since we know that the recent pandemic was just a rehearsal, it is most reassuring to know that we will not have to stand in line during the next pandemic. The dissolvable microneedle patch might come to you by old-fashioned snail mail so that you can administer it in the privacy of your own home. What’s more to be wished for?

Well, thinking about it, there are more dreams to come true. A bio-digital vaccine passport is a solid start for sure, but we should not let ourselves be limited to the vaccine aspect.

A bio-digital passport could be good for all sorts of things that society has to offer. It would make a tremendous ‘Open sesame!’ for daily life, from the doors to the supermarket to the doors of the restaurant, movie theatre, train and bus. Not to forget the door of one’s own apartment.

Maybe the relevant authorities need reminding that our own doors require scanning not just from outside to inside but also from inside to outside. To keep us all safe.

Because what if you forgot to administer the patch sent to you in the mail? No big deal: you’ll be reminded as soon as you try to get out of the door. Voilà!

Oh, the awesomeness.

CHAPTERS

0:00:08 Introduction to Micro Needle Patch and Quantum Dots

1:01:44 Vaccine Tracking, Societal Control, and Concerns Raised

0:03:50 Technical Foundations: Quantum Dots Longevity and Detection

0:04:10 Smartphone Scanning and Machine Learning Usage

0:08:09 Historical Context: AI, Data Centers, and Early Research

0:09:47 Vaccine Delivery, Co-delivery Methods, and Antibody Response

0:11:14 Envisioning Dystopian Control and Compliance

0:15:38 Decentralized Data Storage and Bio Sensing Discussion

0:16:59 Wearables, Biosensing, and Public Endorsements

0:19:06 Technical, Material, and Health Concerns

0:20:41 How the Patch Works: Schematics and Challenges

0:24:40 Societal Control: AI, Compliance, and Bypass Loopholes

0:28:51 Next-Generation Patch: mRNA, Self-Administration, and Trust Issues

0:35:00 Privacy, Data Storage in the Body, and Centralization

0:41:21 Expansion to mRNA Applications and Potential Harm

0:44:03 Digital Identities and Multipurpose Use Cases

1:01:45 Resistance, Public Compliance, and Civil Rights

1:12:32 Public Awareness, Accountability, and Call to Action

RESOURCES:

UK Government Caught Hiding COVID Shot–Death Data “To Prevent Distress or Anger” NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

They already shared the data with Big Pharma — but NOT the public.

NOV 15, 2025

Today, The Telegraph revealed that the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has refused to publish anonymized data that would likely show strong evidence of a link between COVID-19 “vaccines” and mass deaths.

According to the report, UKHSA justified the secrecy by claiming that releasing the figures could cause “distress or anger” among bereaved families if a connection were discovered.

Even more concerning: The same dataset — mapping vaccination dates to dates of death — was provided to pharmaceutical companies but NOT released to the public. UKHSA also claimed that publishing the numbers could “lead to misinformation” or impact vaccine uptake.

For two years, the campaign group UsForThem fought to obtain the anonymised dataset through FOI requests. UKHSA refused every time. Ultimately, the Information Commissioner sided with the agency, allowing the data to remain hidden indefinitely.

MPs and peers had already sounded the alarm last year, urging the government to release the data “immediately,” noting that it had been quietly shared with vaccine manufacturers.

Intentionally withholding critical vaccine-safety data carries serious legal consequences, including but not limited to Misconduct in Public Office, Corporate Manslaughter or Gross Negligence Manslaughter, breaches of statutory duties under public-health and disclosure laws, and potential Fraud by omission or abuse of position.

Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children by Frank Bergman

November 15, 2025 – 12:54 pm Slay News

The move comes even as Canada already runs one of the most permissive “assisted suicide” systems on the planet.

The Canadian government no longer requires a terminal illness to euthanize citizens, and that has increasingly targeted society’s most vulnerable.

The poor, the disabled, the chronically ill, people suffering from depression and autism, and even veterans seeking help for PTSD, are all being euthanized by the Liberal government.

Now, activists want to take it even further.

Under current law, adults can apply for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) even if they are not dying, so long as they have a chronic illness, a disability, or they are experiencing “suffering.”

But organizations such as Dying with Dignity Canada are lobbying for a seismic expansion by opening MAiD to children who are determined to be so-called “mature minors.”

Advocates argue that children who can “demonstrate full decision-making capacity” should be eligible for euthanasia.

Their proposal includes parental consent for those 15 and younger, but astonishingly, they claim the government should be allowed to euthanize 16- and 17-year-olds without their parents’ involvement.

Canada’s own lawmakers appear sympathetic.

In February 2023, the Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying made a stunning declaration:

“Eligibility for MAiD should not be denied on the basis of age alone.”

That single line set off alarm bells across the world.

A Disturbing Pattern

This latest push follows the same trend exposed in our earlier reports: every “safeguard” in Canada’s euthanasia law is temporary, and every temporary limit becomes the next political battleground.

Over the past several years:

Disabled Canadians who couldn’t afford housing were offered MAID instead of support.
Veterans requesting help for PTSD were encouraged to consider euthanasia by government caseworkers.
People with treatable illnesses reported being steered toward assisted suicide as a cheaper alternative to care.

And in earlier expansions, authorities insisted these cases were “rare” or “isolated.”

Yet each scandal was followed by new pressure campaigns to widen access even further.

This is why critics warn that allowing child euthanasia is not a hypothetical fear, as it becomes the next logical step in a program that has already moved far beyond its original scope.

The Next Battleground: Mental Illness

The ruling Liberal Party government has not yet officially embraced the “mature minors” expansion.

However, the idea is already expected to resurface in 2027, when MAiD crosses its next chilling milestone.

In 2027, the government begins rolling out an expansion to MAiD laws to begin euthanizing people whose only medical condition is a mental illness.

That expansion has already been delayed multiple times due to public backlash, but activists remain determined to implement it.

Once mental-illness-only MAiD is approved, opponents warn that pressure for teens and young adults suffering from depression, anxiety, trauma, or gender dysphoria could become impossible to contain.

‘Mission Creep’ Has Become the Norm

International human-rights organizations have repeatedly flagged Canada’s euthanasia program as one of the most dangerous in the world, pointing out that “safeguards” disappear with each legislative review.

Proving their point, Canada’s own committees have already adopted language implying that age is not a legitimate barrier, opening the door to the next phase of normalizing state-sanctioned death for minors.

For critics, this is a line that no civilized nation should cross.

As the debate intensifies, it has become clear that every time Canadians are told MAiD expansion will “stop here,” the government’s own bureaucracies quietly prepare for the next round.

The 2027 expansion will be a major turning point that will reveal whether the world’s most aggressive euthanasia system is poised to target children next.

VAIDS Confirmed, mRNA Kidney Failure Established, PCR Fraud Proven, and Frankenstein Science Unleashed [33:05] NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on Brannon Howse Live

NOV 15, 2025

Last night I joined Brannon Howse Live for an explosive interview covering the biggest breaking health revelations of recent weeks — from the world’s largest mRNA population studies and the PCR testing fraud that fueled the pandemic, to the dangerous new frontier of AI-designed GMO babies.

The Great PCR Fraud

A shocking new German study revealed that, from 2020-2021, 86% of PCR-positive “COVID cases” were not real infections.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on Links Between Vaccines and Autism [VIDEO 37:28] HANNES SARV

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher walks us through a recent study by the McCullough Foundation that established clear links between vaccines and autism.

NOV 12, 2025

In the 1970s, the case rate for autism was 1 in 10,000 in the United States. In 1995, it was already 1 in 1,000. “But now, in 2025, it is at 1 in 31,” epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, says. “This is just skyrocketing. That is over 2% of all children here in the US. This is not something to joke around about. 26.7% of these cases have what is called profound autism, where they require 24/7 daily care. They can’t live on their own. They are not able to hold a job. They can’t even speak, some of them. Their parents’ lives will be shattered, their lives will be shattered,” Hulscher says.

So what might be the cause for such a dramatic increase? Increased screening? Or could it be vaccines?

Since the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which effectively lifted all financial liability for vaccine injuries from the vaccine manufacturers, the childhood vaccine schedule has expanded enormously. Currently, the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule consists of 72 doses for children up to the age of 18.

Now Hulscher, who also serves as the administrator of the McCullough Foundation, is, alongside Dr. Peter A. McCullough and others, one of the authors of a new study on the links between vaccines and autism. Although vaccines have been discussed as a direct or at least a contributing cause of autism for a long time, there has never been any comparable effort to sort this question out, according to Hulscher. Their new study—“Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder”—looks at over 300 peer-reviewed papers and draws a conclusion that “combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination emerges as the single most significant driver of autism risk, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical and epidemiologic evidence.”

“We found in 12 studies with real unvaccinated control groups that all 12 of them found that the vaccinated had higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. Not just autism, but tics, ADHD, as well as chronic diseases including asthma, autoimmune disorders, skin disorders, allergic disorders. The evidence was quite clear,” Hulscher says.

In the episode, we will discuss why it is still the case that such reports and concerns are largely met with accusations of spreading misinformation rather than triggering further studies by the authorities.

We will also look at the current state of health policies under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and ask why the U.S. health authorities have not been making any moves against the provably hazardous mRNA platform.

BREAKING: 2.9 Million-Person Study Finds mRNA Shots Increase Risk of Death, Kidney Failure (Dialysis), and Kidney Injury NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH

Enormous vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study reveals progressively worsening kidney damage over time with no sign of stopping — and a striking mortality signal among Pfizer recipients.

NOV 11, 2025

A major new study published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences of 2.9 million adults — 1.45 million vaccinated vs. 1.45 million unvaccinated — has revealed alarming post-vaccination outcomes. This large-scale, real-world analysis drew from the health records of more than 100 million U.S. patients (TriNetX) to evaluate post-vaccine kidney and mortality outcomes over a full year of follow-up, adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and medication use through one-to-one propensity matching.

The findings are deeply concerning: acute kidney injury and dialysis rates were significantly higher in vaccinated individuals and continued to rise month after month with no indication of slowing. Dialysis — the mechanical filtering of blood used only when the kidneys can no longer function adequately — represents the most severe form of renal failure and underscores the gravity of the observed effect.

Most strikingly, Pfizer (BioNTech) recipients showed an elevated risk of death compared to unvaccinated controls — even after all early post-vaccination deaths were excluded from analysis.

The MAHA followers don’t really know whom they are dealing with… GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE

NOV 11, 2025

The withholding of informed consent, the injection of COVID-19 vaccines that are different from those used in clinical studies, the claim that they would protect against infection -and thus facilitate herd immunity- and that the unvaccinated are a breeding ground for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease are all part of the disgusting vaccine fraud committed at an unprecedented large scale. Hence, people keep asking why don’t THEY stop the vaccination? why don’t THEY admit that the COVID-19 vaccination causes harm? why aren’t THEY punished? etc., but whom are they actually talking about? MAHA believers are fully concentrated on how to stop THEM, without even truly knowing whom they’re dealing with.

All the accusations of corruption, fraud, and financial interests are totally justified but, sad as it is, they’re nothing more than spitting on a rotten apple. To get rid of that apple, you’d need people in power strong enough to change the system, clean it up, and punish those who’ve been cheating. Unfortunately, everyone with that kind of power is part of the same rotten apple, which people naively call ‘THEY’. For example, when Trump publicly glorifies Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, right in front of RFK Jr., he commits fraud too!

Getting rid of them will take far more than just spitting at the system and its powerful lobby of perverted, power-hungry elites. The corrupted egos – always to be found at the very top of every institution involved – behind this dangerous, large-scale experiment on entire human populations are all too eager to close ranks and protect each other, despite all their rivalries and jealousies.
I still firmly believe that only nature can, and eventually will, put an end to the incredible damage caused by that rotten apple in the fruit basket. That apple has to go, but removing it will take a force far greater than anything humans can muster – a force only nature itself can deliver.

We can keep spitting, but we shouldn’t be naïve. We’d better start preparing for the massive storm that’s inevitably coming and think hard about how to use it to finally turn the tide when the rotten apple starts falling apart.

[Ed.: Maha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Joke’s on all of us… Har har hardy har har

Peer-Reviewed Study in Germany CRUSHES the COVID-19 Narrative Around PCR Tests Accuracy

KILLING OUR BABIES IS POPULATION REDUCTION

[Ed.: Humans are still sacrificing their children to Molech!

Israel’s Health Ministry reported on Sunday that a 7-year-old boy from Jerusalem passed away on Shabbos after contracting measles.

November 9, 2025 Yeshiva World News

He passed away after arriving at the emergency room due to complications from the disease.

According to the statement, the child, who had an underlying medical condition, had received one dose of the measles vaccine.

This is the ninth death since the measles outbreak began. Until now, all fatal cases were healthy toddlers with no underlying conditions who were unvaccinated.

Join a YWN Live Alerts Community for Live Breaking News Updates! https://chat.whatsapp.com/CWR7H5Ub4aY9T8qJf7IyfB

[Ed.: The gaslight here is that they didn’t say that the infant “already had an underlying condition” caused by a previous vaccination! They really think we’re stupid, including Yeshiva World News, and many ‘religious authorities’! Even after five years of proof! Kid’s just don’t die from measles: they die from vaccinations!]

“Everything Is a Scam” — John Beaudoin Drops a Bombshell

Hospitals allegedly pocket $200K per Remdesivir patient… and the ‘pandemic plan’ started two years early.

NOV 08, 2025 LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY

Source: Sense Receptor

John Beaudoin: “The hospitals are highly incentivized to add… certain Covid drugs… $200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody’s veins based on a positive COVID test… and the CARES Act was written in 2018, two years before COVID… Everything is a scam.” [Emphasis added]

This clip of electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. is taken from a discussion with Cornelia Rose posted to Rumble on November 3, 2025.

Partial transcription of clip

“The hospitals are highly incentivized to add, not just add Covid, but to use a certain treatment protocol, certain drugs. Use this drug, not that drug. Because if you use this drug, we’ll get $200,000 for this patient. Yeah, I’m using the right number. $200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody’s veins based on a positive COVID test. Because you can get them into the ICU, you get the bill up to a million dollars.

“And the NCTAP program, New Covid Treatment Add-On Payment Plan under CMS, which is Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. If somebody were to type in their browser right now, NCTAP space CMS, hit enter. The first thing that comes up will be that new Covid treatment add-on payment plan. Scroll to near the bottom and you will see something called Veklury. And that’s remdesivir. And there’s a 20% adder for the entire hospital bill if you run that drug through somebody’s veins. Also baricitinib, same thing.

“And the year that was November 2nd of 2020 for remdesivir. That’s when the kidney failure started. We can get into that later. Paxlovid and molnupiravir, those two were incentivized in December of ‘21. A year later, kidney signal goes up even higher after that.

“The point is, you’re absolutely correct. It put to just to write Covid on it. The hospital gets money from the CARES Act. The doctors weren’t personally, incentivized. From what I heard, one doctor up in New Hampshire, when I was testifying for a bill that I wrote, for New Hampshire, trying to make a law, he said, well, I don’t remember getting any bonus for writing Covid. I was like, yeah, okay. I guess you don’t know the system. The system is the hospital administrators lean on the doctors. They coerce them. It’s like, you better start writing Covid or your hospital privileges, your ability to use this hospital are going to go down. There’s a lot of. So the solicitation from the act to the hospital to make money causes the hospital to coerce the doctors. And now you have a lot of COVID being written.

“The other incentive you mentioned, there’s $9,000 to the family that was added later. That was, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was all happy and went in front of a camera and said, look what I did for you. I got you $9,000 funeral expenses for Covid. So if a family has spent their life savings and they’re going broke because their child has cancer and their child dies of cancer, they get nothing. But if a kid or if. If an old guy gets hit by a car and they write Covid on a death record, they get $9,000. So none of it makes any sense.

“So they were incentivized. The pay plan defines the behavior, is what we used to say. These are behavior modification techniques that you learn when you come up with variable compensation plans. If you’re putting together a compensation plan for a corporation, this is what we did in business I was in for 30 years. You incentivize certain things on the variable comp.

“A lot of people are just salaried, right? That’s fixed compensation. But salespeople, marketing people, and many companies that want to be progressive, they create a variable compensation program and they give you metrics to meet. You hit those numbers, like, if you can vaccinate 95% of the workforce, everybody gets a bonus. Right? Those types of things. So the behavior modifications are within the CARES Act and the NCTAP out of CMS, and none of it was to solve any disease.

“You think about it, how is throwing money at something going to solve anything? Oh, because everybody’s out of work and the businesses are shutting down. Yeah, you shut them down. You did that. And the money’s. I mean, everybody was happy to get their $600 check. Like, yeah, but it cost me $20,000. I don’t care if you give me 600. The whole thing is just nuts when you think about it in context.

“And so the behavior modifications from the acts, which the lobbyists wrote the stuff that gave— The CARES Act was written in 2018, two years before COVID. It was finalized in 2019, and all they did was change a few variables in March of 2020, and they passed it as a law. Why did they write it in 2018 if they didn’t know Covid was coming? Everything is a scam.”

Total Page Visits: 611 - Today Page Visits: 3

KrakenNews.us

Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 11/21/25

About the author

Comments

About the author

Related Posts

Comments