COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
[Ed.: FEAR YOUR DOCTOR! Medicine is a disgraced profession. The Hippocratic Oath is no longer applicable… They cannot (and must not) be trusted any longer!
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .
RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie [1:00:59]
Premiered Aug 11, 2025
This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com
00:00 Intro
02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues
06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative
06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines
07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment
08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines
09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone
12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination
14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health
14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects
17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns
18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community
21:17 Explaining mRNA
23:45 How mRNA vaccines work
27:06 Spike protein and possible effects
30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings
32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance
33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children
34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues
39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology
42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues
45:12 History of mRNA vaccines
46:44 Modified mRNA technology
48:40 mRNA research status in 2017
49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017
49:33 Progress in mRNA technology
49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic
55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome
57:06 Doctors offering assistance
[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:
1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio
2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism
4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition
Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering
[Ed.: An Inconvenient Study Full Movie [1:20:36]
Here is the link to the documentary An Inconvenient Study, which premiered tonight at the Malibu Film Festival. It is the brilliant true story of the suppression of a vaxed vs unvaxed children’s study and the Henry Ford Health Center–suppressed because it showed over several years 3-6 TIMES the incidence of chronic illness between children who had even ONE childhood vaccine compared with children compared with children who had NO vaccines. PLUS there was ZERO autism, ADHD and a couple of other things in the unvaxed cohort.
Watch the entire video and be sure to share it with everyone you think SHOULD KNOW about what it shows!
BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Paper Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Unleashed Widespread Silent Heart Damage — Outlines How to Detect and Treat It NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
We present the first-ever paper to map the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myopericarditis — the silent condition driving “unexplained” sudden deaths.
DEC 01, 2025
For years, COVID-19–vaccinated people have collapsed or died suddenly with “no explanation” — athletes on the field, young adults in their sleep, and otherwise healthy individuals with no prior heart history. Our new peer-reviewed paper titled, COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Subclinical Myopericarditis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management, published in the European Society of Medicine’s Medical Research Archives, finally connects the dots — and provides real solutions.
A silent epidemic of subclinical myopericarditis and heart injury is occurring beneath the surface — often without symptoms, without warning, and in some cases, with sudden cardiac arrest as the first sign of disease.
This is the first peer-reviewed paper to formally define, characterize, and clinically map COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myopericarditis. We establish the first unified diagnostic and risk-stratification framework for identifying subclinical cases — and present the first structured management and detoxification protocol aimed at reducing ongoing Spike-mediated cardiac injury.
What is COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myopericarditis?
Subclinical myopericarditis is heart inflammation caused by COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that occurs without the classic warning signs seen in overt myocarditis. Instead of dramatic chest pain or hospitalization, the injury unfolds silently — detectable only through biomarkers, ECG changes, imaging, or antibody/spike measurements.
What Makes It “Subclinical”?
Unlike traditional myocarditis, which presents with obvious symptoms, subclinical vaccine-induced myopericarditis:
- Produces measurable myocardial injury (troponin, BNP, galectin-3, D-dimer)
- Often shows ECG abnormalities (ST/T-wave changes, arrhythmias)
- Can involve pericardial inflammation (thickening or small effusions)
- May show patchy fibrosis or edema on cardiac MRI
- Is usually missed unless specifically screened for
Because affected individuals appear outwardly healthy, this condition is vastly underdiagnosed.
Broad Clinical Manifestations
The spectrum of subclinical myopericarditis is broader — and more dangerous — than the public has been told. Based on the evidence synthesized in the paper, individuals may experience:
Subtle or Intermittent Symptoms
- Atypical or pleuritic chest pain
- Palpitations or “fluttering” sensations
- Intermittent arrhythmias
- Effort intolerance
- Labile blood pressure (episodes of hyper- OR hypotension)
- Heart-rate instability, including POTS-like patterns
Laboratory & Imaging Clues
- Mild–moderate troponin elevation
- Elevated BNP, galectin-3, D-dimer
- ECG: ST-segment changes, ectopy, irregular rhythms
- MRI: late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), edema, or subtle inflammatory patterns
Biologic Evidence of Injury
- Persistent circulating Spike protein
- Detection of vaccine mRNA in heart tissue
- Extremely elevated quantitative Spike antibodies, indicating high cumulative exposure
In some individuals, the initial manifestation may be catastrophic: Sudden cardiac arrest without any prior symptoms.
Autopsy studies show microscopic inflammatory scars too small for MRI to detect, yet fully capable of triggering lethal arrhythmias.
1–3% of COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients May Have Sustained Heart Damage
The emerging evidence suggests that silent heart damage after mRNA vaccination is far more common than health authorities acknowledged. Based on prospective studies and symptom surveillance, a meaningful percentage of recipients — especially younger individuals — may have experienced measurable myocardial injury without ever knowing it. As we outline in the paper:
“The incidence of subclinical myopericarditis is challenging to estimate, as it requires sensitive screening and is not associated with symptoms that would prompt clinical evaluation. Chiu et al found among 763 students a rate of 17.1% had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. Three prospective cohort studies have evaluated the incidence of subclinical myopericarditis after injection of synthetic mRNA. Mansanguan et al. reported an incidence rate of 2.3%, Buergin et al. reported an incidence rate of 2.8%, and a Pfizer-sponsored study yielded an estimated incidence rate of 1.0%, though that study omitted daily cardiac troponin measurements. It is reasonable to surmise that approximately 1–3% of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine recipients suffer some degree of myocardial injury per dose, thereby representing a profound concern for the short- and long-term health of younger vaccinees.”
When applied across millions of doses, a 1–3% injury rate translates into millions of individuals with unrecognized cardiac damage — underscoring the urgent need to take subclinical myopericarditis seriously and to implement proper diagnostic and treatment pathways.
Management
Our paper outlines the first structured clinical management pathway for subclinical myopericarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. This framework — summarized in Figure 3 of the publication — integrates lifestyle precautions, biomarker surveillance, imaging follow-up, and targeted pharmacologic intervention.
1. Foundational Monitoring & Lifestyle Measures
The first priority is to avoid exacerbating myocardial inflammation, prevent arrhythmic triggers, and track the trajectory of recovery. Recommended foundational steps include:
- Temporary abstention from vigorous physical activity
Strenuous exercise increases catecholamines and can precipitate arrhythmias or sudden cardiac arrest in inflamed myocardium. - Serial biomarker testing
Repeated troponin, BNP, galectin-3, and D-dimer measurements help determine whether myocardial injury is resolving or persisting. - Repeat cardiac imaging
Echocardiograms and, when indicated, cardiac MRI are used to monitor ventricular function, pericardial effusion, and fibrosis. - Patient education on warning symptoms
Individuals must be taught to watch for palpitations, chest discomfort, blackouts, blood-pressure instability, or decreased exercise tolerance — all signs of potential deterioration.
These conservative measures form the base layer of long-term care.
2. Spike Detoxification & Pharmacologic Therapy
The second layer of management focuses on clearing persistent Spike protein, reducing inflammation, and preventing progression to chronic fibrosis or arrhythmic risk. The paper details a structured, multi-agent approach:
McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification
A targeted 3-part regimen designed to degrade circulating Spike protein and reduce inflammatory load:
- Nattokinase: 8,000–16,000 FU daily
- Bromelain: 500–1000 mg daily
- Curcumin: 500–1000 mg daily
These agents work synergistically to enhance proteolysis, modulate endothelial inflammation, and support microvascular recovery.
Colchicine (0.6 mg daily)
Evidence supports colchicine in reducing pericardial and myocardial inflammation. It is recommended for most moderate or persistent subclinical cases.
Rapamycin (1–2 mg daily; select refractory cases)
For prolonged or relapsing inflammation, rapamycin offers mTOR inhibition that can:
- reduce immune hyperactivation,
- limit fibrotic remodeling, and
- restore cellular homeostasis.
Its use is generally reserved for severe cases with documented ongoing myocardial involvement.
3. Duration of Therapy
All components of management — lifestyle, monitoring, detoxification, and medications — are typically continued for 12 months or longer, with dosage and duration tailored to:
- biomarker normalization,
- imaging resolution,
- symptom trajectory, and
- overall clinical response.
This recognizes the chronic nature of Spike persistence and the long healing times required for inflamed myocardium.
Conclusion
COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myopericarditis represents a silent, widespread, and devastating form of cardiac injury. Countless indidvuals around the world are now living with undiagnosed heart inflammation — without obvious warning signs.
This paper finally gives clinicians the diagnostic tools, risk framework, and management strategies needed to identify and treat this condition. It closes a gap that should never have existed — a gap created by regulatory agencies that refused to investigate, refused to monitor, and refused to acknowledge the scale of vaccine-induced injury.
What the CDC should have done, the McCullough Foundation is doing.
For four years, regulators ignored the vaccine-injured and failed to develop any clinical guidance. The McCullough Foundation stepped in to fill the vacuum — conducting the research, publishing the papers, and building the pathways they would not. We will continue finding real solutions for the millions of vaccine-injured worldwide.
But this work depends on independent support. If you believe in this mission and want to help accelerate urgent research, clinical protocols, and public education, please consider donating to the McCullough Foundation: https://mcculloughfnd.org/products/donate-1
The institutions that caused this crisis have abandoned the injured. We will not.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
HORROR: Whistleblowers Say Patient “Reanimated” During Organ Harvest—And Staff Were Told to Continue By Frank Bergman
New Jersey organ-harvesting network accused of pressing ahead even as a patient showed signs of life. Lawmakers demand answers.
A New Jersey organ harvesting organization is under intensifying scrutiny after nearly a dozen whistleblowers accused the group of alarming misconduct.
The organization, New Jersey Sharing Network, is accused of harvesting organs from patients who showed signs of life and then covering it up.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) and Oversight Subcommittee Chair Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) sent a blistering letter on November 19 demanding documents and more than 30 transcribed interviews from the New Jersey Sharing Network.
The lawmaker letter cites what they called “several egregious actions and potential violations of federal and state statutes.”
The allegations, supplied by multiple insiders, upend years of industry assurances that misconduct claims were overblown.
Or as reform advocate Greg Segal put it, “the call is coming from inside the house.”
Patient “Reanimated” as Organ Recovery Began
The most explosive allegation says that during a circulatory-death organ recovery, a procedure requiring irreversible loss of heart and respiratory function.
The whistleblowers allege that the patient “reanimated” after the recovery process began.
According to the letter, when the administrator on call notified leadership, the Sharing Network allegedly told staff to continue with the recovery despite clear signs of life.
However, the hospital intervened and halted the procedure, saving the patient’s life.
Whistleblowers also say the organization “deleted or otherwise manipulated” documents related to the incident.
Hundreds Skipped on Wait List, Some Later Died
The letter further alleges:
• The Sharing Network skipped hundreds of patients on the transplant wait list
• Dozens of those patients later died
• The group harvested organs without proper consent
• It operated a fraudulent taxpayer-funded research program
• Leadership may have lied to Congress
• Staff worked under a “culture of fear and retaliation”
Lawmakers warned that under the current Medicare reimbursement model, OPOs may be incentivized to allocate organs out of sequence “to ensure reimbursement and can provide a quid pro quo to transplant hospitals.”
Claims of Manipulated Metrics: 100 Pancreata Thrown Out in One Day
In another allegation, the group is accused of discarding 100 pancreata in a single day, allegedly processed for “research.”
The committee says the volume appears engineered to boost CMS performance metrics by inflating organ recovery numbers.
“While organ research has driven remarkable innovations that improve and save lives, it is concerning that [the Sharing Network] is alleged to have taken advantage of a loophole in the current framework,” the letter said.
Congressional Leaders: Subpoenas Coming if Necessary
Rep. Smith said he is prepared to issue subpoenas if the organization does not comply.
“The allegations these brave whistleblowers have brought forward are some of the most disturbing we have seen in our ongoing investigation into organ procurement organizations,” Smith said.
“If this OPO or any of its senior officials attempt to mislead Congress, destroy records, or obstruct our efforts to get the truth, subpoenas are on the table.
“Compliance is not optional.”
He added that the behavior described “puts the integrity of America’s organ procurement system at stake.”
Experts Warn of Systemic, Premeditated Abuse
Organ reform advocate Greg Segal said the findings suggest the abuses were not isolated or accidental:
“This letter was informed by a dozen whistleblowers who shared documentation regarding specific abuses and potential crimes,” Segal said.
“This is a watershed moment and, I believe, moves these investigations squarely into criminality and corruption, rather than just incompetence or bad federal policy.”
Jennifer Erickson, a senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists, called the allegations “a public health emergency.”
“The Ways and Means Committee documented shocking allegations of cover-ups at the highest levels of New Jersey Sharing Network, including the attempted harvesting of organs from a patient who was still alive,” she said.
Federal Agencies Begin Review
The letter was copied to HHS, CMS, the HHS Office of Inspector General, and the New Jersey attorney general.
HHS said the Health Resources and Services Administration has directed the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network “to investigate these allegations,” adding:
“These reforms are essential to restoring trust, ensuring informed consent, and protecting the rights and dignity of prospective donors and their families.”
READ MORE – Study Praises Canadian Euthanasia’s ‘Real Impact’ on Organ Harvesting
[Ed.: “Nothing new under the sun”! (Especially in the medical field…)
FDA Admits Covid Jabs Killed Kids JENNA MCCARTHY
Dictionaries scramble to revise their definitions of “safe” and “effective.“
DEC 01, 2025
I’m not even shocked. I wish I were. I wish this story landed like a blockbuster revelation—like a federal agency bursting out of the basement yelling, “You guys are NOT gonna believe the fire that’s been raging down there!” But it doesn’t, because some of us have been shouting about the flames for four straight years while the “experts” tossed gasoline, lit scented candles, and insisted we were all watching a wellness ceremony.
The FDA is now admitting—oh-so-politely, like they spilled a little water on the carpet—that the COVID shots “were related” to at least ten of the 96 child deaths they evaluated. Ten. As in two hands. As in the starter pack of a truth they’ve been sitting on while calling parents “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-science lunatics” for even whispering the word myocarditis.
“This is a profound revelation,” wrote U.S. Food and Drug Administration chief medical and scientific officer Vinay Prasad in a memo obtained by The New York Times. “For the first time, the U.S. FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children.”
And here’s the part that no journalist will say out loud: if the FDA is admitting to ten—which by the way is more than ten percent of the sample they studied—the real number isn’t ten. Ten is what you offer when you’re bargaining. Ten is “well, it’s not nothing but relative to infinity, it’s not a ton or anything.” Ten is the smallest number they think they can get away with confessing while pretending to be transparent.
[Ed.: Yes, but the FDA only killed 10 kids…
FDA to raise hurdles for vaccines, faulting COVID shots for 10 kids’ deaths By Rob Stein and Sydney Lupkin
NOVEMBER 29, 20252:49 PM ET NPR
The Food and Drug Administration intends to get tougher on vaccine approvals, as top officials raised concerns about the risk of COVID vaccines for children.
Speaking on Fox News Saturday morning, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would no longer “rubber-stamp new products that don’t work,” claiming it made a “mockery of science.”
Makary’s comments came the day after FDA’s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, told his team the agency would change its annual flu vaccine framework, update vaccine labels to be “honest,” and make other changes to how it reviews vaccines, according to contents of an internal email reviewed by NPR and reported on first by a PBS News Hour correspondent and later by The Washington Post.
Prasad wrote that the FDA would also no longer authorize vaccines for pregnant women without stricter requirements. And for pneumonia vaccines, manufacturers will have to prove they reduce disease rather than show they generate antibodies. He also raised questions about giving multiple vaccines at the same time, which is standard practice.
The changes could make it much more difficult and expensive for vaccines to get approved, further limiting the availability of vaccines, which are considered among the safest and most effective tools for protecting people against infectious diseases.
While all vaccines carry some risks, most public health experts argue the current process for vetting vaccines before marketing has long assured that the benefits of vaccines outweigh their risks. Studies required after vaccines are approved and surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), also flag potential safety issues once vaccines are in use.
FDA says an analysis links COVID shots to some deaths
Makary said on Fox News that 10 children had died from the COVID shot during the Biden administration, but did not offer specifics about how the FDA came to that conclusion. Millions of children have received the vaccine.
Officials with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the COVID analysis and changes to vaccine review standards.
According to the FDA email from Prasad, he told the agency’s biostatistics and pharmacovigilance team to analyze 96 reported deaths from 2021 to 2024, and they determined 10 children died “after and because of” the COVID vaccine. But Prasad said the true number was likely higher.
Dr. Paul Offit, who directs the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, said in a text message that Prasad has not shared the evidence that these vaccines killed 10 children.
“Because he doesn’t provide any evidence, he is asking us to trust him on an important issue,” Office said. “All this will do is scare people unnecessarily. At the very least, he should provide all the evidence he has so that experts in the field can review it and decide whether he has enough data to prove his point.”
Dr. Jesse Goodman, a professor at Georgetown University who held Prasad’s job at FDA from 2003 until 2009, said in an email that the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccine approval, has been “recognized globally as a gold standard regulator.” Goodman defended “immunologic endpoints like antibody levels” for the accelerated approval of pneumonia and influenza vaccines. He said science supports their use and they are confirmed with studies after approval: “These approaches have helped provide children and adults with timely access to safe and effective vaccines, saving many lives.”
Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota, reviewed the email from Prasad and challenged his statement that “COVID-19 was never highly lethal for children.” Osterholm also questioned the FDA’s latest analysis of adverse event reports attributing the 10 deaths to COVID vaccines.
“Prasad’s email is filled with factual mistakes and misrepresents both the severity of COVID in children (1597 deaths in 2020-2022) and how the US responded to the first signals of possible vaccine-associated pediatric deaths in May 2021,” Osterholm wrote in an email to NPR.
“While Prasad’s email notes 10 such deaths, these cases have never been presented for review by the medical and public health communities or published in the medical literature,” Osterholm continued. “Given the record of this Administration to misrepresent scientific data regarding vaccines, until these cases have been reviewed by an expert third party, like the National Academy of Science[s], we can not accept the fact they are vaccine-associated deaths.”
Surveillance system collects vaccines reports
The FDA makes public data from the VAERS surveillance system co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But FDA cautions, “it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause and effect relationship has been established.” In his email, Prasad wrote that “with case reports, causality is typically assessed on a subjective scale. In this scale ranging from certain to unlikely — certain, possible/likely, and probable are broadly considered as related to the product.”
Makary said on Fox News that when the COVID shot was first rolled out, it was “amazing” for people at high risk of coming down with severe disease, but things have changed.
“Back in 2020, we saw a reduction in the severity of illness and lives saved, but now recommending that a 6-year-old girl get another 70 million COVID shots – one each year for the rest of her life – is not based on science. And so we’re not going to just rubber stamp approvals without seeing some scientific evidence.”
The claim is the latest move by Trump administration health officials questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and how the government has regulated them. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long questioned vaccines.
The FDA restricted eligibility for the updated COVID vaccines in August after announcing the agency planned to require more evidence about the shots’ safety and effectiveness going forward.
CDC committee will meet to review vaccine policies
The FDA email on vaccine policy comes just before the CDC convenes a crucial two-day meeting of that agency’s influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Dec. 4-5. The committee is in the process of conducting a major review of how children are inoculated against dangerous infectious diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio and hepatitis B.
Many public health experts are concerned the committee will upend the childhood vaccination schedule. It could move to delay the timing of some inoculations, space out vaccinations and call for the reformulation of some vaccines. Taken together, the moves could result in fewer children getting protected and the resurgence of once-vanquished diseases.
Asked about Makary and Prasad’s claims that the COVID vaccine caused deaths among 10 children, Moderna, whose COVID vaccine is approved for children as young as 6 months old, pointed to a statement it made in September. The company says that multiple published, peer-reviewed studies from a variety of sources show its shot is safe and that it is “not aware of any deaths in the last year or pertinent new information from prior years.”
Moderna says it monitors its vaccine’s safety along with regulators in more than 90 countries. “With more than one billion doses distributed globally, these systems — including in national health systems across Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and the U.S. — have not reported any new or undisclosed safety concerns in children or in pregnant women.”
Pfizer did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
RELATED: CDC vaccine panel adds new rules for getting the COVID vaccine in a tense meeting
[Ed.: FOR SALE: Bridge in Brooklyn – good condition. Contact the editor.]
10? SASHA LATYPOVA
An unscheduled rant
NOV 30, 2025
Breaking news: The FDA, after fake-regulating vaccines for 50 years, and specifically after 5 years of pretending to regulate mRNA shots, “found” 10 dead children ages 7-18. It is now ok to say that they were killed by these poison shots. Robert Malone, a deep state plant and a known liar, penned a celebratory post about this development at the FDA, called it a “revolution” and implied he has secret info he can’t disclose because he is too important. And you are clearly not:
Malone News
A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval
In the context of being vice-chair of the ACIP committee and a member of the relevant working group committee (whose proceedings are confidential), I have been in the loop concerning the investigation of these post-COVID vaccine deaths in children, whose deaths have been known since this summer but not released to the public due to the need to validate …
Read more
21 hours ago · 438 likes · 117 comments · Dr. Robert W. Malone
Here is my official statement on this:
Lies do not become the truth because you reduced lying by ~2%. Thousands of children died from the poison Malone claims he invented. I am old enough to remember that he pushed mRNA shots to some unaccompanied minors on the Hawaiian beach in 2021. Did he apologize for telling the kids to be not afraid of mRNA shots and think of saving grandma, while not being their healthcare provider and never having treated a patient for anything in his entire illustrious career as a “vaccinologist”? How many kids got jabbed because of that show? Millions of people are dead and injured because of the shit he and his comrades in BARDA/DARPA/ASPR and all the global PPPPPPPPPPPPs did for decades and continue doing. Malone presents this as a “revolution”? This is positively Red October and storming of Reichstag simultaneously! A whole 10 victims were found. “Mostly from myocarditis”, how curious. Almost like this is political and not science at all, because we know for a fact many kids died from strokes, giant blood clots all over the body and cancer. Those don’t count, obviously. Talk about adding insult to injury followed by slap in the face of all victims. After Malone lied, lied, lied, lied for 5 years, they slowed down the stream of bullshit just a tiny bit, just enough to award himself a medal…
Furthermore, Trump admin is desperate as midterm elections are approaching. They think that admitting a tiny fraction of deaths they caused by the Operation Warp Speed and Trump’s “beautiful shot”, is going to pacify his base that is rapidly realizing they have been had. Again. This is a political stunt. Prasad still claims “vaccines saved millions of lives, yada-yada, time for introspection”. You can read the email that he sent to the FDA staff which was immediately “leaked” here. Puhleeze. I am also old enough to remember how Prasad was ridiculing the vaccine injured on podcasts with that moron, ZDogg. I don’t buy his newfound “humility”. There are hundreds of dead children in VAERS database alone, and who knows how many more thousands injured? VAERS is under-reported by 100X and they have removed many children’s reports or hidden them by removing the age from searchable filed.
Per Prasad’s letter, somehow the FDA studied ONLY the cases of dead kids 7-18. What happened to the dead children 0-7? The absence of this age group, together with Prasad’s convoluted explanation on how these deaths were attributed, makes the political motivation of all of this even more clear. You see, they needed to “match” what they “found” to the myocarditis warning for ages 7-18 they put into the labels of mRNA shots earlier this year. They are not looking at the vaccine death reports. They are framing this all as myocarditis and cherry picking the mode of death to build the case why “Biden bad, radical left democrats bad” and claiming that the FDA could not have possibly found any children’s deaths without Makary and Prasad bravely discovering myocarditis and putting that warning on the label first. If this hurts your brain, it means you still have it and have not digested it in order to join a political party.
Of course, Prasad’s letter affirms the vaccine religious cult doctrine throughout and worships vaccines as life saving magik. The 10 deaths will be conveniently recast as “risk-benefit was worth it to save granny” because they will claim that many more children died from the coof. Watch Bob Malone do this while squinting bravely at the upcoming ACIP meeting this week. We know how those coof deaths happened, don’t we? And we also know that to claim a coof death and get payments and protections from the government, there was no requirement to “study” this with “gold standard science” for 5 years. An unvalidated, unapproved PCR magik wand or just writing some fraud on a death certificate in exchange for government money was completely kosher.
In another interesting passage, toward the end of his letter, he blames Peter Marks for pushing BLAs in 2021 in order for the Biden admin to enable mandates. This happens to be true. However, Prasad and Makary can revoke those BLA’s, claim “Freedom ScientistsTM”, Jessica, Kevin and the Moussad agents, based on “SV40 contamination”. So, what stops brave MAHA warriors Makary and Prasad from doing this now, especially that they found some children’s deaths to attribute to these improperly issued BLAs? Watch them not revoking BLAs, because the myocarditis warning is already on the label and they will claim they did their job by properly describing the risk to children.
Finally, Prasad curiously admits that vaccines (all vaccines) are not regulated by the FDA at all:
Let me explain this, which is how all vaccines get on market and mandated to your children:
- FDA picks an accomplice, e.g. Pfizer or Merck, whoever the Congress and the current admin has recently received large political checks from. Asks them to submit data from some mice with “antibody titers”.
- Throws these reports into the circular filing system on the -20th floor of the DUMB under the FDA’s campus.
- Issues BLA to the “novel vaccine platform”.
- All future versions from the platform are cranked out in perpetuity, and no other company can ever say “I can do the same bullshit experiment with mice” and get a competitive product approved. Isn’t gold standard science amazing?
This is not “regulation”, this is organized crime, of which Prasad is now a key participant, whether he realizes it or not. Did he realize yet that mRNA shots are EUAs in disguise? It is within HHS authority to pull them from market, he just needs and ok from RFK Jr – does he know that?
By the way, fun fact – number 10 is the FDA’s favorite answer to anything: any benchmark, any regulatory threshold, it’s always “10”. Like 10 ng/shot of “DNA contamination” that they allow in vaccines. Or 10 msec threshold for QT prolongation (which was my area of cardiac safety work for a while). It’s not anything related to Freemasonry, no worries. I know how “scientific” these numbers are. They are always pulled out of the rear end of “The ExpertsTM”. Don’t buy this “we studied 96 cases, blah-blah-blah” baloney! They sat on this since the summer, and are now feeling cornered enough to spit out number “10”. Keep the pressure on. They are cracking (that’s the only really good news from all of this), but we have to stay strong.
This was an unscheduled rant. I have a proper post coming for you tomorrow on things that do matter and we have to keep pushing for.
DEVASTATING: COVID-19 “Vaccines” Linked to More American Deaths Than WWI, WWII, and Vietnam COMBINED LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY
FAR MORE than the FDA’s admitted 10 child deaths almost certainly occurred in just the FIRST WEEK.
NOV 30, 2025
Source: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Pfizer’s mRNA shot is linked to at least 470,000 American deaths in the first year ALONE.
“ So that is a MINIMAL estimate.
This number is so large, it is rivalling the death toll of World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War combined for American casualties.
Just in that FIRST YEAR.”
“And we can only imagine how much Moderna killed.”
“ This also does corroborate the VAERS extrapolation estimate death toll, which is actually 600,000 American deaths based on an under reporting factor of 31.
But again, these are CONSERVATIVE estimates.
We are likely in the MILLIONS, for American deaths.”
[Ed.: What amazing times we live in! Nowadays, you can kill millions of people, make a ton of money doing so, and then never even be prosecuted for it! Eureka!!
There Was No Virus JAMES ROGUSKI
Fear and absolutely insane behavior was triggered based on a genetic sequence that was stored in a computer database.
NOV 30, 2025
The fourth round of negotiations for the WHO’s Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System Annex to the Pandemic Agreement will be held December 1-5, 2025.
https://apps.who.int/gb/IGWG/e/e_igwg4.html
Please realize that they are negotiating to set up a worldwide network so share genetic information from “pathogens with pandemic potential.”
They do NOT need actual pathogens.
All they need is a genetic sequence in a computer.
This article is based on resources that are available on Jon Fleetwood’s Substack account. I strongly encourage you to subscribe to his newsletter and support his work.
JonFleetwood.substack.com/archive
I also encourage you to support the organization (U.S. Right to Know) that submitted the FOIA request that obtained the following document:
Duke University Darpa Pandemic Prevention Platform” 9.85MB ∙ PDF file Download
“Because we recognize the potential that during a pandemic outbreak only electronic viral sequence information may be available, we will work with Synthetic Genomics Vaccine, Inc. to optimize their protocols for the synthesis of error-free viral infectious clone genome for direct transfection.”
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/21-F-0004-09.2025-Doc-REDACTED.pdf (page 4)
“The program is open about building a platform that works even when no physical virus exists, only a computer file.”
Jon Fleetwood
In plain terms, DARPA expected outbreaks where governments supply genome files instead of biological agents, requiring U.S. laboratories to fabricate the infectious agent themselves.
The evidence suggests the world may not have experienced a natural viral pandemic, but a global biological rollout built around a DIGITALLY ASSEMBLED spike protein that became the foundation for diagnostics, modeling, and the mass vaccination campaign itself.
DARPA’s insistence that full pandemic response must function when “only electronic viral sequence information” exists directly affirms the core premise of Fleetwood’s findings: modern biodefense systems treat digital code as a virus, converting computational constructs into physical biological entities.
The FOIA document reveals that DARPA was funding workflows where a virus is born as data, and only afterward turned into an infectious clone—the same conceptual pathway through which the 32% human-derived mosaic spike emerged.
The Wuhan-Hu-1 spike (COVID-19 spike protein), assembled entirely in silico and containing a non-coronavirus-derived mosaic, fits precisely within the digital-first, synthetic-construction pandemic pipeline DARPA had already built before COVID-19 emerged.
The DARPA document suggests the disturbing possibility that the COVID-19 “pandemic” may have originated not from a naturally circulating virus, but from a computationally generated sequence that was subsequently treated as a real pathogen and mass-manufactured into international medical countermeasures (“vaccines”).
And because this digitally assembled spike became the sole antigen used by Pfizer and Moderna, the world’s first mass-distributed mRNA vaccines could have effectively programmed billions of human bodies to manufacture the same engineered, domain-modular construct…
In other words, billions of people may have been injected with instructions to manufacture a synthetic, digitally designed spike protein born not from nature, but from a Pentagon–NIH engineering pipeline.
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpas-secret-60-day-pandemic-pipeline
EXPOSED: US Labs Breeding Deadly Foreign Ticks in Bid for mRNA Vaccines
