Daily Shmutz | COVID-19  / Malicious Medical Quackery | 12/14/25

Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia.  Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch?  Enter your batch number(s) and find out.  Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able! 

If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiffAnother great legal resource is: Freedom Council  https://freedomcounsel.org;  For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/

RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram.  You can access everything here]

DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film   [1:17:21]

 

Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie   [1:00:59]

Premiered Aug 11, 2025

This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com

00:00 Intro

02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues

06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative

06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines

07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment

08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines

09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone

12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination

14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health

14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects

17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns

18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community

21:17 Explaining mRNA

23:45 How mRNA vaccines work

27:06 Spike protein and possible effects

30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings

32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance

33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children

34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues

39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology

42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues

45:12 History of mRNA vaccines

46:44 Modified mRNA technology

48:40 mRNA research status in 2017

49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017

49:33 Progress in mRNA technology

49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic

55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome

57:06 Doctors offering assistance

[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:

1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio

2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)

3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism

4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition

 

Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering

[Ed.:  An Inconvenient Study  Full Movie  [1:20:36]

Here is the link to the documentary An Inconvenient Study, which premiered tonight at the Malibu Film Festival.  It is the brilliant true story of the suppression of a vaxed vs unvaxed children’s study and the Henry Ford Health Center–suppressed because it showed over several years 3-6 TIMES the incidence of chronic illness between children who had even ONE childhood vaccine compared with children compared with children who had NO vaccines.  PLUS there was ZERO autism, ADHD and a couple of other things in the unvaxed cohort.

Watch the entire video and be sure to share it with everyone you think SHOULD KNOW about what it shows!

 

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH   Dec 14, 2025 · FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

Colleagues and Readers,

Please take a moment to read this important new article outlining the profound risks that mRNA and other gene-transfer technologies pose to chromosomal stability and heritable human health. As the evidence now shows, mRNA platforms, viral vectors, and CRISPR systems can introduce irreversible genomic damage — including integration events, large-scale structural rearrangements, and germline exposure with transgenerational consequences.

We are currently working on a manuscript to fully elucidate this serious issue.

The Profound Risks of Gene Transfer Technology on Chromosomal Stability

An Irreversible Heritable Harm

Introduction

Gene transfer technologies — viral vectors, CRISPR/Cas9, and mRNA-lipid nanoparticle platforms — introduce foreign genetic material into human cells with the promise of curing disease. In reality, they cause profound, often irreversible damage to chromosomal stability. When these alterations occur in germline cells or reach reproductive tissues, they become permanently inscribed into the human gene pool, condemning unborn generations to inherited genomic fragility, cancer predisposition, and novel genetic disorders. The evidence is no longer theoretical: documented cases of genomic integration, transgenerational transmission of structural variants, and contamination-driven mutagenesis prove that these technologies are already initiating heritable harm on a population scale.

Insertional Mutagenesis from Viral Vectors: Proven Transgenerational Transmission

Retroviral and lentiviral vectors integrate into the host genome and have repeatedly caused insertional oncogenesis. In the landmark SCID-X1 trials, integrations near proto-oncogenes triggered leukemia in multiple patients, with long-term follow-up confirming persistent clonal dominance and secondary malignancies decades later. When similar integrating vectors reach germline cells — as shown in animal models and inadvertent human exposures — the resulting chromosomal lesions are faithfully transmitted to all offspring, creating lineages with permanently elevated cancer risk and genomic instability.

Even adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, long claimed to be “non-integrating,” have been repeatedly shown to integrate at low but biologically significant frequencies, particularly in hepatocytes and stem cells, thereby posing a heritable oncogenic risk.

CRISPR-Induced Structural Catastrophes: Permanently Heritable

CRISPR-Cas9 routinely triggers massive on-target structural variations — megabase deletions, chromothripsis, and complex rearrangements — that are transmitted to progeny in every model organism tested, including primates. Off-target effects and p53-mediated selection further enrich for cells harboring dangerous chromosomal abnormalities. In human embryos, these events produce high rates of mosaicism and aneuploidy that become fixed in the germline of resulting individuals [8,9]. Once introduced, there is no mechanism to remove or repair these heritable defects across generations.

mRNA Vaccines: Documented Genomic Integration and Germline Exposure

Despite initial assurances of strict transience, multiple independent laboratories have now proven that both vaccine mRNA and contaminating plasmid DNA can enter the nucleus, undergo reverse transcription, and integrate into the human genome:

  • Aldén et al. (2022) demonstrated LINE-1-mediated reverse transcription and integration of Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA into human liver cell DNA in vitro.
  • Catanzaro et al. (2025) provided the first clinical proof in a living patient: next-generation sequencing of tumor and blood from a 31-year-old woman who developed explosive stage IV bladder cancer post-Moderna vaccination revealed integration of a Spike ORF fragment into chromosome 19q13.42 — a fragile genomic region associated with DNA repair defects and oncogenesis.
  • von Ranke N, Zhang W, Anokin P, et al. (2025) analyzed transcriptomes from patients with new-onset cancers and severe adverse events after mRNA vaccination and documented widespread genomic instability, persistent spike expression, cGAS-STING activation indicating intracellular DNA damage, and oncogenic signaling consistent with plasmid DNA integration and SV40 promoter-driven dysregulation.

Critically, regulatory biodistribution studies show lipid nanoparticles and their nucleic-acid cargo accumulate in ovaries and testes at levels orders of magnitude above background. Commercial vaccine vials have been independently confirmed to contain residual plasmid DNA — up to 100 billion fragments per dose — including active SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences known to drive nuclear uptake and oncogenesis. These data establish a clear and present pathway for vaccine-derived sequences to enter the germline and initiate heritable chromosomal damage that will be transmitted to all future generations.

Horizontal Gene Transfer and Population-Level Germline Pollution

Engineered sequences introduced at scale do not remain confined. Horizontal gene transfer from gene therapy vectors and GMOs into human microbiota and reproductive tracts has been documented, creating permanent environmental reservoirs from which foreign DNA can continually enter the germline [15,16]. Once integrated, these sequences are propagated indefinitely, progressively degrading chromosomal stability across the entire species.

Conclusion: A Heritable Catastrophe Already in Progress

The era of reckless gene transfer must end. Integrating vectors, CRISPR-induced chromothripsis, and mRNA-vaccine plasmid contamination have crossed the threshold from hypothetical risk to documented, irreversible heritable harm. Future generations will inherit this genomic damage with no possibility of recall or repair.

References

  1. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, et al. Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(9):3132-3150. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI35700
  2. Nienhuis AW, et al. Genotoxicity of retroviral integration in hematopoietic cells. Mol Ther. 2006;13(6):1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.03.001
  3. Pike-Overzet K, et al. New Insights and Unresolved Issues Regarding Insertional Mutagenesis in X-linked SCID Gene Therapy. Mol Ther. 2017;25(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mt.6300297
  4. Sabatino, D. E., Bushman, F. D., Chandler, R. J., Crystal, R. G., Davidson, B. L., Dolmetsch, R., Eggan, K. C., Gao, G., Gil-Farina, I., Kay, M. A., McCarty, D. M., Montini, E., Ndu, A., & Yuan, J. (2022). Evaluating the state of the science for adeno-associated virus integration: An integrated perspective. Molecular Therapy, 30(8), 2646–2663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.004
  5. Kosicki M, et al. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:765-771. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4192
  6. Leibowitz ML, et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing. Nat Genet. 2021;53(6):895-905. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7
  7. Alanis-Lobato, G., Zohren, J., McCarthy, A., Fogarty, N. M. E., Kubikova, N., Hardman, E., Greco, M., Wells, D., Turner, J. M. A., & Niakan, K. K. (2021). Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(22), e2004832117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004832117
  8. Zuccaro MV, et al. Allele-specific chromosome removal in human embryos. Cell. 2020;182:1659-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.025
  9. Aldén M, et al. Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44(3):1115-1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073
  10. 10.Catanzaro JA, Hulscher N, McCullough PA. Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. Int J Innov Res Med Sci. 2025;10(10). https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol10-i10/2130 https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130
  11. 11.von Ranke N, Zhang W, Anokin P, et al. Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation: Evidence from New-Onset Adverse Events and Cancers Post-Vaccination. Preprint. July 2025. Available at: https://blog.fdik.org/2025-07/preprints202507_2155_v1.pdf
  12. 12.Speicher DJ, et al. DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose-response relationship with serious adverse events. OSF Preprint. 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mjc97
  13. 13.Wijaya, A. J., et al. (2025). Genomic data representations for horizontal gene transfer detection. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, 7(4), lqaf165. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf165

 

Total Page Visits: 248 - Today Page Visits: 1
Share

About the author

Due to the sensitive and sometimes controversial nature of the content shared in the Daily Shmutz (along with the potential ramifications of unveiling such information in an increasingly censorious world), the identity of the DS Editor remains anonymous.