COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery
Cultivate Nosocomephobia and iatrophobia. Spread ‘vaccine hesitancy’! How Bad is My Batch? Enter your batch number(s) and find out. Then take action and purge yourself of this shit to the extent possible. It’s do-able!
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff. Another great legal resource is: Freedom Council https://freedomcounsel.org; For Vaccine Exemptions: https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-exemption-attorneys/ .
RESOURCE: VACCINE INFO COURSE All material from the course has been transferred to telegram. You can access everything here]
DIED SUDDENLY: Official Documentary Film [1:17:21]
Inside mRNA Vaccines – The Movie [1:00:59]
Premiered Aug 11, 2025
This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology. www.insidemrnavaccines.com
00:00 Intro
02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues
06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative
06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines
07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment
08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines
09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone
12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination
14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health
14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects
17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns
18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community
21:17 Explaining mRNA
23:45 How mRNA vaccines work
27:06 Spike protein and possible effects
30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings
32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance
33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children
34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues
39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology
42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues
45:12 History of mRNA vaccines
46:44 Modified mRNA technology
48:40 mRNA research status in 2017
49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017
49:33 Progress in mRNA technology
49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic
55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome
57:06 Doctors offering assistance
[Ed.: Other vaccine controversies include:
1. How the vaccines caused the paralysis of polio
2. How vaccines caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
3. How vaccines cause brain damage, but we call it autism
4. How we covered up brain damage and made it a mental condition
Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering
[Ed.: An Inconvenient Study Full Movie [1:20:36]
Here is the link to the documentary An Inconvenient Study, which premiered tonight at the Malibu Film Festival. It is the brilliant true story of the suppression of a vaxed vs unvaxed children’s study and the Henry Ford Health Center–suppressed because it showed over several years 3-6 TIMES the incidence of chronic illness between children who had even ONE childhood vaccine compared with children compared with children who had NO vaccines. PLUS there was ZERO autism, ADHD and a couple of other things in the unvaxed cohort.
Watch the entire video and be sure to share it with everyone you think SHOULD KNOW about what it shows!
Prevent Medical System Bullying with Informed Consent Law ALIX MAYER
Life-saving knowledge to help you stand strong
DEC 22, 2025
The principle of informed consent stands as one of the most important safeguards of personal freedom. Yet, as many have painfully discovered—especially during the COVID-19 era—this principle is frequently violated.
Upgrade to paid
“Informed Choice” Is the Better Term
True informed consent is not merely signing a form or hearing a quick disclaimer. It is the receipt of all information material to make an intelligent, voluntary decision about a medical procedure.
More accurately, it should be called informed choice, because once a person is fully informed, they may reasonably refuse the intervention. Giving or withholding consent is the outcome of a process that respects the patient’s autonomy.
The 1972 Turning Point: From Physician Standard to Patient Standard
Before 1972, the prevailing legal rule in most American jurisdictions was the “professional” or “physician-based” standard: doctors were only required to disclose what was customary among their peers. A doctor could satisfy the duty of informed consent by telling a patient whatever other reasonable doctors in the community typically disclosed—often very little about serious risks.
That changed dramatically in 1972 with two landmark rulings decided just months apart:
- Canterbury v. Spence (1972, D.C. Circuit)
A 19-year-old underwent spinal surgery after being told – shockingly – that the risks were no greater than “any other surgery.” He became permanently paralyzed. The court rejected the physician-based standard and ruled that even a 1% risk of lifelong paralysis was material information that a reasonable patient would want to know. - Cobbs v. Grant (1972, California Supreme Court)
A man with an ulcer agreed to surgery that ultimately led to removal of his entire stomach due to undisclosed complications. The California Supreme Court explicitly adopted the “patient-based” standard: disclosure must be judged by material information a reasonable patient would need to know to make an informed decision—not by what physicians customarily say.
These twin 1972 decisions shifted the legal benchmark across the United States from “what doctors usually tell” to “what a reasonable patient needs to know.” The patient, not the profession, became the measure of adequate disclosure.
Vaccines and the Erosion of Informed Choice
Despite these clear legal precedents, the routine administration of vaccines—especially childhood vaccines and the COVID-19 shots—has often operated as though the old physician-based standard never left.
Those Pastel-Colored Information Sheets
Most parents and patients receive the CDC’s Vaccine Information Statements (VIS)—those familiar pastel sheets handed out in doctors’ offices that legally satisfy the bare minimum of “informed consent.” A detailed analysis of these sheets reveals a troubling pattern:
- 63% of the conditions listed focus on mild or temporary reactions (soreness, low-grade fever, fussiness).
- Only 37% address severe outcomes or death.
This framing dramatically understates the material risks a reasonable person would want to consider before injecting a pharmaceutical product, especially into a healthy child. In reality, 90% of the VIS should be the material sequelae – the serious or deadly consequences and the chance that someone will experience one of those.
Many healthcare providers justify withholding or downplaying risks by appealing to the “greater good.” This is pure utilitarianism—and it has no place in the doctor-patient relationship. A physician’s primary ethical and legal duty is to the individual patient, not to public health statistics.
The old canard that vaccines only cause a serious adverse event in 1 in a million people has been used as a tool of coercion. Coercion is not consent.
Evidence from Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Research
About a dozen true vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated studies show unvaccinated children have dramatically lower rates of asthma, allergies, autism, ADHD, and autoimmune disorders. Approximately 60% of American children and adults now live with at least one chronic illness—most commonly the “4-A” conditions: asthma, allergies, autism, and autoimmunity. Those conditions are seen almost exclusively in the vaccinated.
Severe outcomes from vaccination are clearly not 1 in a million – it’s greater than 1 in 2 – and this is material information that is absolutely necessary to meet today’s patient-centered informed consent (choice) standard.
The Biggest Violation: COVID Shots Were Unlawfully Mandated While Under EUA
Under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), federal law (21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3) explicitly requires that individuals be informed of the option to accept or refuse, of known and potential risks, and of the extent to which risks are unknown.
Yet millions received COVID shots under workplace and school mandates without any meaningful disclosure of risks such as myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, neurological injuries, or emerging reports of aggressive (“turbo”) cancers. In 2021, coercion replaced choice most egregiously. The legal requirement for informed consent under EUA—and the patient-based standard established in 1972—was violated on a massive scale.
Reclaiming Your Right to Informed Choice
You do not need to be “anti-vaccine” to defend medical liberty. You simply need to insist on your long-established legal and ethical right—grounded in the patient-based standard of 1972—to make fully informed medical decisions for yourself and your children.
Never allow yourself or your child to be bullied, rushed, or shamed into a medical decision.
The power imbalance in medicine only persists if patients allow it. Informed choice is not a privilege granted by the medical establishment; it is your fundamental right.
You are in control.
State by state, America is following Canada’s euthanasia policy and here’s why… LEO HOHMANN
New York becomes 13th state to allow doctor-assisted suicide. We should expect more states to join the fray; idea is to make offing yourself a socially acceptable option when you check into hospital.
DEC 21, 2025
New York is set to become the latest state to legalize medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill under a deal reached between the governor and the state Legislature, leaders announced on Wednesday.
In an op-ed in the Albany Times Union, Governor Kathy Hochul announced she will sign the proposal after she made an agreement with lawmakers to include a series of “guardrails.”
Hochul, a Catholic, said she came to the decision after hearing from people on all sides of the issue.
She wrote:
“I was taught that God is merciful and compassionate, and so must we be. This includes permitting a merciful option to those facing the unimaginable and searching for comfort in their final months in this life.”
Long Island News reports that 12 other states and the District of Columbia have laws to allow medically assisted suicide, according to advocates, including a law in Illinois signed last week that goes into effect next year.
Look at the map below and see if you notice a pattern in the countries where killing one’s self is encouraged.
New York’s new law, the Medical Aid in Dying Act, requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six months make a written request for life-ending drugs.
Two witnesses would have to sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person’s attending physician as well as a consulting physician.
The Long Island News notes that the governor said the bill’s sponsors and legislative leaders have agreed to add provisions to require confirmation from a medical doctor that the person truly had less than six months to live, along with confirmation from a psychologist or psychiatrist that the patient is capable of making the decision and is not under duress.
Of course, we know that doctors don’t always have the best track record of predicting the length of their patients’ lives. Yet, they have been granted god-like powers under these laws to approve or disapprove the termination of life.
The legislation was first introduced in 2016 but stalled amid opposition from New York State Catholic Conference and other groups. The Catholic organization argued the measure would devalue human life and undermine the physician’s role as a healer.
In a statement, New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan said Hochul’s position “signals our government’s abandonment of its most vulnerable citizens, telling people who are sick or disabled that suicide in their case is not only acceptable, but is encouraged by our elected leaders.”
HERE’S MY TAKE: We all know where this is heading. All one needs to do is look at the progression of assisted suicide in Canada. When it was first passed, there were all sorts of so-called guardrails. One by one, those guardrails have been gradually removed and the death squads get bolder and bolder, to the point where they are now considering euthanizing children. This is a path down which no society should go. Because once you open Pandora’s Box and turn doctors into killers, the possibilities for nefarious actors are endless.
And we all know who is driving this trend toward turning doctors into killers.
The technocrats and globalist power elites have already committed to a future in which AI runs our factories, our offices, our military, our churches, everything. The need for human beings just isn’t what it once was. We are all considered expendable.
That’s why you see the reckless foreign policies that invite war, in the name of keeping the peace. The reckless medical treatments that get advanced at “warp speed,” in the name of keeping us healthy. And the reckless war on food that substitutes bioengineered material for real food, then stamps it “healthy” and “safe for human consumption.”
It really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out. It just takes a commitment to having your eyes, ears and minds wide open, paying attention to patterns and false narratives.
Julie Threet Speaks Out Against mRNA [VIDEO 51:28] JAMES ROGUSKI
Julie Threet joins me for the SIXTEENTH interview in an ongoing series of interviews in which people from around the world express their views regarding the mRNA injections.
DEC 20, 2025
“My mRNA story began working at the mass vaccination clinics in Chico, CA. I was a volunteer with Enloe Medical Center who partnered with Butte County Public Health to run the clinics. My role was “non-medical” nurse helper. I helped in the syringe draw room, with administration, and most often helping a group of nurses administer the vaccines. The mass vaccination clinics where I worked ran from January through June, 2021. I thought I was “Rosie the Riveter” so I took many photos of the experience. Not with the intent to use as evidence but to share with my future grandchildren as part of my “COVID time capsule”. In my estimation, I probably passed out 56,000 syringes full of Pfizer/Moderna poison during my time at the clinics. That does fuel my fight against Butte County as you can imagine.
What I witnessed at the clinics, a Chico State track athlete immediately falling with a seizure as the “poison” entered his body, right in front of me, is an image I will never forget. The menstrual disruptions I heard from the young Butte Community College nurses I worked with after their shots, prompted me to ask Dr Andy Miller our County Health Officer about them during a lunch break. “Is this vaccine a problem for young women?” I need to know, I have a young daughter administering vaccines as part of her job at Sutter Health in Alameda County!! The immediate reaction “NO” with an arrogance I didn’t expect, was again something I will write about in my book. I also worked at the Enloe Testing Pavilon where unvaccinated staff had to go before their shifts to prove they weren’t sick. That is a another eye opening experience – the amount of tests that went into the hazardous waste bin daily was staggering and I took a picture of that too.
Of course I would be injured by the two Moderna shots so now carry the “vax-injured” label. Microangiopathy (lesion on the brain) was my first clue. Chronic tinnitus and two detached retinas would NEVER have happened without two shots of Moderna mRNA. My Mom’s death from four shots of Moderna followed and is another chapter of my book. I have her vaccine card and demanded the Johnson County Coroner run an ultrasound to look for those fibrous clots (denied). I bombarded the Wyoming State Pathologist brought in to analyze her cause of death with information about the vaccine – his response: “Julie, I have no clue what you are talking about”. He did retain her tissues which I will send out for testing once we have a reliable test available in the United States.
My blood is currently being analyzed in Europe so hope to get those results in 4-6 weeks. My current fight is for blood safety after receiving 6 bags of blood in August to keep me from dying due to severe anemia from a GI bleed. My spike antibody levels were extremely high at the 30 day mark (16,664), increased to 18,339 at the 60 day mark, and then again to 20,334 at the 90 day mark. Will get retested next week and should be interesting after another getting another blood transfusion last week as the GI bleed was still active and my hemoglobin dropped back to 4.3. So another 4 bags of blood given. My health status is not good. But going to the hospital that poisoned me in the first place is torture.
- CA State Board of Pharmacy. I have given 12 public comments before this Consumer Protection Agency in Sacramento. Give them VAERS Data and demand accountability. I have also had to file my own personal claim against CVS in Chico who REFUSED to fill my post-hospitalization prescriptions because of my “anti-vaccine” activism.” True Story.
Follow Julie Threet here:
https://rumble.com/user/PrayingHawk144/videos
CA Board of Pharmacy (last public comment #12):
CA BOARD OF PHARMACY MEETING 11/5/25: 17 MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINES!
2) Road Trips with Ronald F Owens Junior across California. So far, have visited 33 counties outside of Butte, speaking to their Board of Supervisors. The videos of these appearances are on my Rumble Channel “Prayinghawk144”.
BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING 12/16/25: “I GOT NO RESPONSE”
TRINITY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING 10/21/25: STOP THE SHOTS!
3) Xavier Becerra visit to Chico on 3/14/22 for secret meetings with pediatricians. Here’s some of the detail as I did a FOIA request and have been demanding answers from the Supervisors now for over two years. They got $225k from Becerra to “hunt” children of Chico for 4 months from March to June, 2022. Horrifying. Sierra Nevada Brewery even held a clinic as part of the “challenge”.
James Roguski 310-619-3055
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
DETAILS: REPEALThePREPAct.com
SIGN THE PETITION: REPEALThePREPAct.ORG
All support is deeply appreciated.
