ISRAEL (IINO)
SCREAMS BEFORE SILENCE Full Video [57:00] A documentary film on the sexual violence committed by Hamas on October 7th, Screams Before Silence is a documentary film led by American businesswoman Sheryl Sandberg, that explores the sexual violence by Hamas during the Hamas-led attack on Israel, on 7 October 2023, including events at the massacre at the Nova Festival and abductions to the Gaza Strip.
Something Very STRANGE Happened On October 7th – IDF Special Forces Officer [1:13:49] Yishai Fleisher
Dec 4, 2025 Yishai Interviews
Dr. Yair Ansbacher – Commando and author – cracks open the forbidden. What was it all about? Looking to the future – are we in a ceasefire or a hudna (Islamic stalling period to re-arm and attack again). Has anything changed? A new generation of leadership may reject the old thinking and make policy with a clear understanding of the Jihadists real goals. More from Yair: https://www.amkalaviyakum.com/
NO, IT’S NOT NETANYAHU!!! Avi Abelow
December 4, 2025 Pulse of Israel
It is astonishing, and downright hypocritical (no surprise there), that the very political left screaming the loudest for an inquiry into October 7th, blaming Netanyahu, refuses to take even an ounce of responsibility for how their own heroes in the security establishment, legal establishment, along with the chief insubordination movement “Brothers in Arms,” directly paved the road to Israel’s security failure to prevent the Hamas atrocities of that horrific day.
Let’s break this down…
Soon after Oct. 7th, in an interview with Patrick Ben David, Charlie Kirk voiced out loud whether the Netanyahu government issued a “stand-down order” on Oct. 7th. Because, to anyone familiar with Israel’s security and Gaza border, it was impossible to conceive that the IDF was not able to protect the border, for hours. Many of Charlie’s followers instantly seized on the question as supposed proof that “Netanyahu turned on Israel”, and it was done to gain world sympathy to reconquer Gaza, and that theory has grown in conservative circles.
Let me be absolutely clear, not as a political talking point, but as someone who has spent years exposing Israel’s deep state and the internal rot that has been eating away at our security apparatus and legal system:
There was no stand-down order by the government.
The opposite is true. The people who did stand down on Oct. 7th, who ignored intelligence, crippled the army, and blocked the government from acting, were the unelected elites in the security, military, and legal establishment.
And the documented facts are far more damning than any conspiracy theory.
The same voices now screaming “Netanyahu is to blame” and demanding an inquiry — which every Israeli wants, just not one run by the same untrustworthy deep-state legal officials who are already covering up their own failures, as we see in the Attorney General, the Military Attorney General, and the Supreme Court Chief Justice blocking the investigation into the Sde Teiman video — are completely silent about the one thing that actually did happen for an entire year leading up to the Hamas invasion:
The political left’s anti-judicial-reform protest movement, led by the “Brothers in Arms” organization, openly waged a campaign of military insubordination that broke the backbone of the IDF.
This was not fringe.
This was not hidden.
This was broadcast proudly across Israel’s mainstream media. Supported by many current and former leaders of the political left.
For months, Israelis watched senior Air Force officials and elite pilots, the very people responsible for protecting the country, go on camera declaring that they would refuse training and operational duty.
They weren’t bluffing.
They weren’t ashamed.
They were celebrated.
At the height of the protest movement, Israel’s largest news channels reported with excitement that the Air Force was “no longer functional.” Let that sink in.
You had veteran pilots and Air Force leaders announcing publicly on camera:
“We will refuse to bomb Iran even if Israel is attacked.”
This was not only a national disgrace, it was a national disaster.
And it sent a clear message to our enemies: Israel’s military deterrence has collapsed.
So while some now blame Netanyahu for not magically stopping the attack in real time, they ignore the “brothers in arms” movement that actively sabotaged Israel’s military readiness, for political gain, all to topple Netanyahu.
Even more shocking is what we now know from the security establishment’s own documents.
Israel’s top security and intelligence heads refused to update the Prime Minister on the threat, even the night of the attack.
This is not speculation.
This is not rumor.
This is written, signed, and submitted by former intelligence Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar himself in a letter to the Supreme Court.
Here are the documented facts, written by him:
– At 1:30 AM, the intelligence establishment had concrete information.
They knew Hamas was preparing to invade at least two Israeli communities.
They knew taking hostages were part of the plan.
They did not inform the Prime Minister or the Cabinet.
Not at 1:30.
Not at 2:00.
Not at 4:00.
Not at 6:00.
Netanyahu only learned of the attack after it had already begun, at around 6:30 AM!!!
Think about the magnitude of that failure.
There are only two possible explanations:
Option 1:
The heads of intelligence and the IDF did not want Netanyahu to order a military response, so they withheld the information.
Option 2 (the more sinister possibility):
They assumed it would be a limited attack, but big enough, painful enough, humiliating enough, to trigger mass public pressure to topple the Netanyahu government.
Either way, the truth is unavoidable:
The Prime Minister can only act on the intelligence that is given to him. If he is not given the information, he cannot mobilize the army to protect the country.
And remember, these same intelligence chiefs ignored Hamas’ signals for months, even years.
They dismissed warnings from field observers.
They suppressed reports.
And days before the attack, intelligence Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar told the government to increase the number of Gazans allowed to work inside Israel, claiming:
“Hamas is interested in improving the economic situation in Gaza.”
This is not just incompetence.
This is ideological blindness.
This is systemic failure.
On the morning of October 7th, as Israel was burning and Israelis being massacred and kidnapped, there was one more obstacle, this time a legal one.
The IDF needed the government to formally declare war so it could activate full wartime emergency powers.
Netanyahu attempted to do exactly that early in the morning.
But Israel’s Attorney General, who has undermined the authority of the elected government for years, blocked it.
She insisted that a full, formal vote of government ministers was required, a procedure that could only be done hours later, at night.
While Israelis were being slaughtered…
While terrorists roamed freely…
While civilians begged for help…
The Attorney General prioritized bureaucracy over saving lives.
That decision alone delayed the army’s ability to fully mobilize.
This wasn’t a government stand-down.
This was a legal chokehold, imposed by someone who never received a single vote from the Israeli public.
There are many more horrific failures, military, legal, intelligence, all traceable to the same root:
A deep state that despises the elected government, acted independently of it, and undermined its authority at every turn.
To pretend that Netanyahu “ordered the army to stand down” is not only false, it is an insult to truth.
If you want even more detailed information, watch the video in the comment below.
But here is the bottom line:
It Wasn’t Netanyahu Who “Stood Down.”
It Was Israel’s Deep State That Prevented the Government From Defending Israel. [Emphasis added]
The people who failed Israel on Oct. 7th were not the elected leaders, they were the unelected elites who controlled the intelligence flow, crippled military readiness, and interfered with wartime decision-making., the same ideological crowd who pushed the suicidal “land for peace” methodology that led to the Oslo “peace” accords and the Gaza “disengagement”/expulsion.
Whether through political motives, ideological opposition, or catastrophic arrogance, they created the conditions that allowed Hamas to invade unchallenged.
No stand-down order came from the Prime Minister.
The stand-down came from the deep state.
And Israel, and the Jewish people, paid the price.
And despite all the pain we have endured, we are now in the midst of both defeating our jihadi enemies in the region and exposing the deep state apparatus that enabled this catastrophe. Their days of wielding power and sabotaging Israel from within are coming to an end, no longer will ideologically driven elites be able to undermine the proud, strong Jewish national homeland we are destined to be.
Not just another country, which is how they want Israel to behave, showcasing the Holocaust Museum to diplomatic visitors as if our entire identity is rooted only in tragedy and the need for self-defense.
We are a Jewish nation, restored as a sovereign people in our ancestral homeland, meant to bring visiting world’s leaders to the Temple Mount itself, inspiring them with God’s covenant with the Jewish people and the vision of rebuilding the Third Temple as part of fulfilling our divine destiny.
Hamas called their war against us the Al-Aqsa flood? Well, it’s time we act as a true sovereign and take for ourselves exactly what they tried to take away from us – our Temple Mount to rebuild the Temple!
Do I think Netanyahu will do this? Not at all. I still have much criticism of how he doesn’t do enough, but thank God, he was the Prime Minister on Oct. 7th to push back against the intentional or unintentional sabotage of our nation by a dangerous deep state apparatus.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
TRUMP WANTS ISRAEL TO PULL OUT FROM SYRIA, THIS IS WHY BIBI MUST SAY, “NO” by Micha Gefen
December 4, 2025 Israel Unwired
When calls emerge to pull back from southern Syria — to end what many see as “occupation” or entanglement in Syria’s civil war — they capture a certain moral and political appeal. Yet a hasty or unconditioned Israeli withdrawal, absent credible guarantees, risks exchanging a fragile status quo for long-term instability, threats to Israeli security, and humanitarian disasters.
For now, Israeli official discourse reflects grave concerns. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently declared: “We demand the complete demilitarization of southern Syria, in the Quneitra, Daraa and Suwayda provinces.”
He added, during a visit to wounded soldiers, that what Israel expects from Damascus is “to establish a demilitarised buffer zone from Damascus … including the slopes and summit of Mount Hermon.”
Likewise, Defense Minister Israel Katz has reaffirmed a long-term Israeli presence: “The IDF will remain at the summit of the Hermon and the security zone indefinitely … to ensure the security of the communities of the Golan Heights and the north.”
If Israeli forces withdrew in the near term, however, who would fill the vacuum? According to recent analysis by ALMA Research and Education Center, a Syria under its new regime — led by Ahmed al‑Sharaa — remains a “stability of instability.”
ALMA warns that if al-Sharaa fails to consolidate control, internal collapse or a flare-up of extremist violence is highly plausible. In that scenario, southern Syria could descend into inter-militia warfare, with re-emergent jihadist infrastructures — and especially danger to ethnic and religious minorities such as the Druze.
Leaving southern Syria unprotected would therefore not create peace, but likely chaos. ALMA’s “day after” paints a grim picture: “power struggles … Syria will become no-man’s land … the disintegration of the new Syrian army … ISIS could regain strength …”
Moreover, in such chaos, southern Syria could once again become a launchpad for attacks on Israel — rockets, mortar fire, drones, infiltration, and worse.
Beyond pure security concerns, there is a moral and humanitarian dimension: ALMA underscores the likelihood of “massacre and revenge against the Druze in southern Syria” — a tragic risk requiring Israel and international actors to prepare for “defence, evacuation, and humanitarian assistance.”
To withdraw without binding, enforceable arrangements would be to gamble with the lives of civilians and the stability of the region.
That is why a responsible policy cannot be a simple pullout. Instead, Israel, together with its Western and regional partners, must insist on: security guarantees; enforceable demilitarization; international monitoring; and protection plans for vulnerable minorities.
Only then can we consider transforming tactical control into strategic stability. Otherwise, the dream of withdrawal risks becoming a nightmare — for Israel and for the innocents caught across the border.
Netanyahu just made the craziest move of his career. JOSHUA HOFFMAN
Netanyahu’s pardon request isn’t desperation. Regardless of whether you like him as a political leader or agree with his politics, it’s another masterful move from “The Magician.”
DEC 02, 2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request for a presidential pardon, submitted this past Sunday, marks one of the most consequential constitutional and political moments in Israel’s modern history.
Five and a half years after his trial began (and nearly a decade after the initial investigations), Netanyahu has turned to President Isaac Herzog for intervention.
For starters, Israel’s political system features a democratically elected prime minister who runs the government and makes executive decisions, as well as a president (appointed by Israel’s parliament) who serves as a largely ceremonial head of state with the power to grant pardons.
Netanyahu faces three corruption cases: Case 1000, Case 2000, and Case 4000.
In Case 1000, Netanyahu and his family are accused of receiving approximately 700,000 shekels (approximately $215,000 USD) in benefits (including expensive cigars, champagne, and jewelry) from businessmen Arnon Milchan and James Packer. There is no bribery charge here, but the indictment accuses him of fraud and breach of trust.
In Case 2000, Netanyahu is accused of negotiating a quid pro quo with Israel’s largest newspaper, known in English as Ynet. According to the indictment, Netanyahu is accused of agreeing to push legislation designed to hurt Ynet’s rival newspaper, Israel Hayom; in exchange, Ynet’s publisher would improve media coverage of Netanyahu. Again, the charges are fraud and breach of trust, not bribery.
In Case 4000, this is the most serious case, and the only one including bribery. Prosecutors allege that, in exchange for positive coverage on the popular Israel news site Walla, Netanyahu used his regulatory power to grant business benefits worth over 1.8 billion shekels (approximately $500 million USD) to the owner of Israeli telecommunications company Bezeq. This case forms the core of the legal threat facing Netanyahu.
Under Israeli law, the President (Isaac Herzog) holds the authority to issue pardons, typically after the completion of a criminal process. The rationale is to allow the President to consider broader moral, humanitarian, or societal factors that sit outside the strict legal framework. Once a request is filed, it is transferred from the President’s Office to the Pardons Department in the Justice Ministry. There, officials gather input from relevant state authorities, including the Prosecutor’s Office, and prepare a professional evaluation.
Only after these assessments are returned does the President’s Legal Advisor draft a separate recommendation for the President. The final decision rests with President Herzog alone.
In Israel, pardons before a guilty verdict are exceedingly rare. They undermine the very purpose of the pardon process, which presumes a completed legal outcome. The only remotely comparable case is the 1984 Bus 300 affair, in which agents from the Shin Bet (an Israeli intelligence agency) murdered Palestinian terrorists and then tried to cover it up. Before any police investigation began, President Chaim Herzog (father of today’s President Isaac Herzog) issued preemptive pardons to the agents for murder, manslaughter, and obstruction of justice. But even in that extraordinary national-security case, pardons were tied to conditions of resignation, publicly expressing remorse, and formally pleading guilty.
Therefore, Netanyahu’s request, submitted in the middle of an active trial, is nearly unprecedented. Even one of his former defense attorneys said in an interview that a pardon cannot be granted unless Netanyahu admits guilt — meaning Netanyahu’s current approach is legally incompatible with the pardon mechanism. This underscores the deep tension between the political narrative (“I am innocent and persecuted”) and the legal framework (which typically requires acknowledgment of wrongdoing).
On Sunday, Netanyahu’s attorney, Amit Hadad, submitted two documents to the Office of the President: a formal legal letter justifying the request, and a personal appeal letter from Netanyahu himself. Both were immediately made public in Hebrew. Sources estimate that the formal review process (collecting materials, analyzing precedents, and drafting legal opinions) will take up to two months.
Within hours of submitting his request on Sunday, Netanyahu released a video message in Hebrew explaining why he was seeking a pardon before his trial concludes. For context, Netanyahu has previously said, explicitly, that he is completely innocent and wouldn’t seek a pardon from the President.
In his letter and video, Netanyahu cited multiple reasons, such as the length of the proceedings. “Almost a decade has passed since the investigations began,” he said. “The trial has gone on for nearly six years, and it is expected to continue for many more.”
Netanyahu also claimed that testimony and evidence presented so far “crash the case entirely” and demonstrate that the evidentiary foundation was constructed “through severe wrongdoing.”
The third reason, according to Netanyahu, is the new court-imposed testimony schedule, requiring Netanyahu to testify three times a week — a burden he labeled “impossible,” unprecedented, and incompatible with his responsibilities as prime minister. “Israel faces enormous challenges and enormous opportunities,” he stated. “National unity is required to meet them. The continuation of the trial tears us apart from within.”
Netanyahu added another layer of complexity when he said in his video: “President Trump called for an immediate end to the proceedings so that together we could advance vital shared interests between Israel and the United States during a window that may not return.”
In short, Netanyahu argues that ending the trial is a national necessity.
Hebrew media outlets reported that Herzog may respond to Netanyahu not with an outright rejection or acceptance, but with a conditional proposal. Herzog’s office denied the reports, but the idea has captured the public imagination because it mirrors the 1984 Bus 300 precedent: a pardon paired with concessions. Herzog might propose acknowledgment of wrongdoing, limitations on Netanyahu’s future political activity (namely retiring from politics), and a plea bargain.
Sources close to Herzog have indicated that Netanyahu would not receive a pardon without paying a “significant” price. Others point out the difficulty of enforcing political retirement in plea deals; longtime Israeli Member of Parliament Aryeh Deri agreed to resign from the Knesset in 2021 as part of a plea deal, but returned the next year.
People close to Netanyahu have reportedly said he will not negotiate conditions with Herzog. Their stance: “Either there’s an unconditional pardon or the prime minister will continue with his trial until he is acquitted.”
As I see it, this stance is Netanyahu signaling to his base that he’s decisive, unafraid, and always willing to take bold action when the stakes are high. But just as he reversed his long-standing claim that he would never seek a pardon, it’s obvious that every option is on the table now — and he understands better than anyone how to turn that flexibility into political advantage.
Behind closed doors, he and Herzog could quietly agree on an exit from political life; in public, they could maintain that the pardon is not contingent on his retirement, while Netanyahu announces — “separately” — that he is stepping back to “focus on my health,” or “spend more time with my family,” or some other dignified rationale.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu continues to deny all wrongdoing and maintains that the cases were fabricated by police and prosecutors in what he calls an attempted political coup. This doesn’t get talked about enough (if at all) in international media and even English-speaking Israel media enough — that Netanyahu has been subjected to lawfare, the use of legal mechanisms as political weapons.
In this view, the charges against Netanyahu are not purely about justice or accountability. Rather, they are attempts to achieve by courtroom what cannot be achieved at the ballot box. Netanyahu, despite scandals, has shown a remarkable ability to retain public support and win elections — an ability that frustrates both his rivals and segments of the Israeli Left, of which Isaac Herzog used to be (and could still be) a part back when he was a Member of Parliament from 2003 to 2018.
If Herzog responds with “Yes, but then you need to acknowledge admission of guilt,” Netanyahu will almost certainly reject it, knowing that admitting guilt would expose him legally and shatter the political narrative he has built for years: that he is the victim of a politically motivated prosecution. If Herzog responds with, “Yes, but then you must retire from politics,” Netanyahu will spin this to the Israeli public as an attempt from the Left-wing to impose their political will on the country (which, at times, is historically accurate).
So, there’s a good chance that Netanyahu just checkmated the Israeli justice system — and this should not come as a surprise to anyone. Netanyahu, regardless of whether you like him as a political leader or agree with his politics, is a masterful politician and one of the smartest people on this planet.
The real question is whether Netanyahu wants to remain in politics. If he doesn’t, he just created a respectable offramp, as I wrote: Herzog and Netanyahu could privately agree that publicly they will affirm the pardon is not conditioned on Netanyahu’s retirement, while Netanyahu simultaneously announces — “separately” — he is stepping back to “focus on my health,” or “spend more time with my family,” or some similarly dignified explanation.
If Netanyahu wants to stay in politics, then he has every incentive to drag this process out, frame the pardon request as an act of national responsibility, and force Herzog into a corner where any conditional offer can be portrayed as political persecution. In this scenario, Netanyahu uses the very structure of Israel’s constitutional system — a political prime minister appealing to an apolitical president — to reinforce his long-standing argument that the legal establishment is being manipulated against him. A conditional pardon becomes proof of a conspiracy; an unconditional pardon becomes vindication. And if the request is rejected, he simply returns to the courtroom and tells the public, “I tried to end the divisions, but they refused.”
In that sense, the pardon request becomes less about ending a trial and more about shaping the political terrain ahead of the next election. (General elections are scheduled for no later than next October.) By submitting the request now, Netanyahu has essentially guaranteed that every possible outcome strengthens his narrative, that he alone stands between Israel and a hostile Israeli Left, that the country needs his steady hand during wartime, and that the legal case against him is collapsing anyway.
Whether he is granted a pardon or not, the request itself is a political act — and Netanyahu, known in Israel as “The Magician,” knows as well as anyone how to turn a legal proceeding into a strategic battlefield.
TRUMP’S “PEACE PLAN” WAS MEANT TO FAIL, GIVING ISRAEL TIME TO PREPARE FOR THE NEXT WAR [VIDEO 4:00] by David Mark
December 1, 2025 Israel Unwired
President Trump left Israel, declaring that peace was imminent. All that was left to do was the release of the hostages and an international security force to ensure Hamas would disarm. The first happened, and the second has yet to happen and probably never will.
Most of the challenges people have faced with the “peace plan” would only occur if Hamas were to disarm or if the International Security Force (ISF) were present. Still, none of that has materialized, and it probably won’t. Whether Trump understood it from the beginning or not, non-Muslim Brotherhood Sunni Arab states were never comfortable with Turkey and Qatar being involved with the Gaza ISF. As I mentioned in an earlier article, it was the UAE and Saudi Arabia that refused to be part of the initiative if it involved Turkish ground forces.
Netanyahu’s goal in this stage of the war was to retrieve the hostages and leave Hamas in a state where it could no longer pose a real threat to Israel. The advent of the yellow line running through Gaza as more than a military armistice line, but rather a sort of new border area, has left Hamas cornered and ultimately weakened. True, there is tremendous pressure for Israel to allow Gaza reconstruction to commence, but once again, Netanyahu’s reliance on Finance Minister Smotrich to freeze Israel’s budget allocated for the project has ensured there is no following phases to Trump’s peace plan as long as Hamas doesn’t disarm, which it won’t voluntarily and since no one else is willing to go in and do it, the current situation remains as is.
Israel ultimately remains in control of 53% of Gaza, Hamas is kept to a degraded state, unable to launch a real offensive into Israel, and Israel establishes a new political boundary called the yellow line – extending de facto military control over Gaza for the foreseeable future.
While Trump did not necessarily intend for any of this to turn out the way it has, it is clear Prime Minister Netanyahu did, and for the first time since October 7th, he has outplayed both Qatar and Turkey. While this sort of strategy has bought Israel time and some territory, Netanyahu’s maneuver in the political arena will only be seen as a masterpiece if he and Israel’s defense establishment can prepare for the dual threat of a Turkey-Iran alliance that is fast careening towards the Jewish State.
Huge news yesterday in Israel: “Netanyahu requests pardon” Avi Abelow
December 1, 2025 Pulse of Israel
Let’s break this down to be understood properly…
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not ask for a pardon because he is guilty.
Netanyahu asked for a pardon because after close to thirty years of continuous investigations, fabrications, leaks, manipulated witnesses, and media incitement, every single case brought against him has collapsed under the weight of its own lies.
I’ve been raising the alarm about this systematic legal assault on Netanyahu from the very beginning, dating back to his first term as Prime Minister in 1996.
The justice system has spent three decades trying to bring down one man, and after failing again and again, the system itself now stands exposed as the biggest political weapon ever deployed against a sitting Israeli Prime Minister.
This moment is not a concession, it is an indictment.
Not of Netanyahu.
But of those who abused the legal institutions of the State of Israel to try to destroy him, representing the leader of the right-wing, traditional/religious Israeli public.
For years many of us warned: the justice system, the prosecution, senior legal officials, and their partners in the mainstream media were running a political war, not a legal process. The goal was never justice, it was regime change. Israelis were told Netanyahu was corrupt. Netanyahu was a criminal. Netanyahu would soon fall.
Instead, something else fell, the credibility of the Justice system itself.
Because while they hunted Netanyahu relentlessly, the public watched as the very people weaponizing the law became the biggest violators of it. They watched as evidence in the cases against Netanyahu was revealed to be manipulated. They watched as it was exposed that state witnesses were pressured and threatened. They watched case after case fall apart, not because Netanyahu was powerful, but because the accusations were baseless.
And now, the façade has shattered entirely.
The latest crisis is the clearest proof of all. Supreme Court Chief justice Amit illegally appointed himself Chief Justice, in violation of procedure and democratic norms, and the entire legal establishment backed him. These are the same people who insisted for years that the law is sacred, procedural purity is everything, and no one, especially not a Prime Minister, may ever circumvent judicial authority. Yet when one of their own did far worse, suddenly the entire system fell silent.
Silence is complicity.
And Israelis are no longer blind.
Then came the Sde Teiman blood libel.
After a year of denial and burying the case, The Military Attorney General admitted responsibility for leaking the manufactured, manipulated video to the press, fueling the biggest modern blood libel against Jews in all of history, leading to billions of video views around the world, an even bigger spike in Jew-hatred, and UN resolutions stating IDF soldiers sexually harassed Hamas terrorists. All a fabricated lie.
A national firestorm followed. The attorney general covered for her. The Supreme Court Chief Justice, the same one who appointed himself, is blocking every investigator proposed by the Justice Minister. A full month later, after her confession, fake suicide attempt and tampering with evidence (throwing her phone into the sea!), no investigation into the Military Attorney General has begun.
Why? Because an investigation would expose all of them, the prosecution, the military attorney general’s office, the Attorney General and the Supreme Court!
As an important tangent, a transparent investigation would also determine whether the claims are true that the Biden administration was not simply a bystander, but involved in the Sde Teiman video to provide them the legal pretext they needed to apply the Leahy Law and freeze critical weapons shipments to Israel, at the very moment they were pressuring Netanyahu to stop the war in Gaza.
The Sde Teiman scandal is not a failure of oversight.
It is a revelation of the tremendous rot of the deep state.
While this corrupt legal elite sabotaged the war effort since Oct. 7th, weakened the government, and smeared IDF soldiers, the cases against Netanyahu continued to unravel.
Every witness fell apart, because the truth always eventually does what truth does.
Netanyahu is not asking forgiveness for crimes he didn’t commit. He is forcing the country to confront the real criminals, those who abused the justice system to overthrow an elected Prime Minister.
This is not the defeat of Netanyahu.
This is the exposure of those who tried to defeat him.
They wanted to remove him by force, not ballot.
They wanted to replace democracy with judicial rule.
They believed the people would bow.
Instead, they triggered a national awakening.
Many Israelis today now see clearly what some of us were highlighting years ago: a small unelected elite, disconnected from the people, protecting itself at the expense of the nation. They thought taking down Netanyahu would secure their power.
Instead, they have signed their own downfall.
They still hold influence. They still fight. But they will lose, not through revenge or political purges, but through sunlight. Exposure is fatal to corruption.
Netanyahu will remain in power until the people choose otherwise.
Not prosecutors.
Not journalists.
Not judges.
A democracy removes leaders with ballots, not with leaks, threats, and fabricated indictments. The deep state failed to topple Netanyahu, but in doing so, it toppled its own legitimacy.
And the Israeli public is awake now.
They see who built the blood libels.
They see who manipulated justice.
They see who illegally seized authority.
Israel is entering a new era, one where no unelected power can rule from the shadows, and no legal elite can decide elections in place of the people.
Netanyahu asked for a pardon, not for himself, but for Israel.
To end this manufactured war against the proud Jewish population in Israel and allow the nation to move forward.
To understand the depth of this deep state, judicial witch-hunt against Netanyahu, the following must be understood,,,
The anti-Netanyahu protest machine has worn many costumes over the years, economic protestors, then Covid protestors, then judicial reform protestors, then hostage protestors, then ultra-Orthodox draft protestors, and now Oct. 7 inquiry protestors.
The messaging changed each time, but the mission never did.
With enormous funding each time, and aggressive advertising campaigns engineered to inflame emotions about real issues and fracture society, the objective was consistent: topple Netanyahu by any means outside the ballot box.
And now, with many Israelis recognizing the pattern, the protest movement has shriveled to a small ideological fringe driven more by resentment of a proud Jewish state of Israel, that Netanyahu and his constituents represent, than by reality.
This deep state supporting fringe wants an Israel devoid of Jewish identity, exactly as Ron Pundak, right-hand man of Shimon Peres and chief architect of the Oslo “peace” accords, voiced when asked about the failure of the peace process to attain peace. His response? The Oslo “peace” accords was never about peace. They were about stopping Israel from becoming a Jewish state.
Not enough people in Israel understand this, but at least the mask of the deep state is being exposed, and support for the witch hunt against Netanyahu has dropped significantly.
Because now more people know the truth.
The deep state did not defeat Netanyahu.
It exposed itself and sealed its own downfall.
Strengthen your faith in Hashem. We are in the midst of a tremendous wake up process.
We will defeat our enemies who want to destroy Israel. And we will overcome our internal challenges who want to neuter the Jewish character of the State of Israel.
Great times are coming for humanity as the Jewish people continue to internalize and fulfill our divine purpose in our Biblical, ancestral homeland.
Stay with me at Pulse of Israel for thoughtful, in-depth analysis and powerful updates you won’t find anywhere else.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
To join the Israel Video Network – Pulse of Israel Group Click Here:
Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/aviabelowpulse
Whatsapp ➡️ https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMv
How Tel Aviv’s Elites Are Toasting the End of Israeli Sovereignty By Mordechai Sones
While Israel bleeds, the Globalists count their chips
November 30, 2025 Jewish Home News
On the crisp morning of November 27, 2025, while the smoke from the northern border had barely cleared the nostrils of the reservists returning home, the valet parking at the David Kempinski Hotel was overflowing with the sedans of the untouchable class.
Contents
Inside, under the soft lighting of the ballroom, the captains of Israeli industry, banking, and diplomacy gathered not to mourn the fracturing of the old world, but to carve up the carcass of the new one. They came for the Calcalist “Global Economy 2025” conference, an event sold under the banner of “A New World Order,” illustrated by a golden globe cracked into jigsaw pieces—a visual metaphor so on-the-nose it felt less like branding and more like a confession.
The flyer for the event, distributed with the glossy detachment of a luxury real estate brochure, promised to map the opportunities of tomorrow. But for those paying attention to the tectonic shifts beneath the floorboards, the agenda read like an autopsy of the Jewish nation-state. This was not a summit on how to strengthen Israel’s independence; it was a seminar on how to liquify it into the global stream.
This is not just a figure of speech. In 2022, 80% of our startups were Israeli companies. Today, nearly half incorporate in Delaware before hiring a single engineer. This is the “Delaware Flip”—a legal mechanism that ensures the intellectual property of the Jewish state is owned by American entities, while the risk remains in Tel Aviv. They are not just selling shares; they are selling the deed to the nation’s future tax base. As usual, the most chilling phrase was not buried in the fine print; it was boastfully printed in bold, cheerful font: “From the U.S. to Post-War Iran.”
Sanitizing Survival
There is something profoundly macabre about the phrase “Post-War Iran” when sandwiched between discussions on “Global Investments” and “Cross-Border Industries.” For the banking executives and tech moguls sipping espresso with British Ambassador Simon Walters, “neutralizing the Iranian threat” was not a messianic deliverance or military triumph—it was a market correction. The conference agenda treated the existential war that has consumed the region as merely a “geopolitical development,” a bump in the road to be smoothed over by “normalization agreements” and the flow of “The New Oil”—technology and data.
The receipts for this betrayal are in the numbers. While the conference celebrated a record-breaking $71 billion in high-tech M&A exits for 2025, Moody’s was simultaneously downgrading Israel’s credit rating, explicitly citing “geopolitical risk” and “no exit strategy.” The contrast is nauseating: the elite economy is cashing out at record highs specifically because it is decoupling from the state, while the real economy—the one owned by the reservist closing his faltering business to return to Gaza—is left holding the bag for the national debt.
This corporate stoicism stands in stark, violent contrast to the reality analyzed by independent observers just miles away. As the Kempinski crowd applauded the “Middle East Rewired,” reports were circulating about the “managed destinies” of Israel and Iran—a concept detailing how global powers have orchestrated the outcomes of our conflicts to suit a trilateral balance of power.
The conference’s promise to explore “the intersection of global politics and international investments” is a polite euphemism for a darker truth: Israel’s security is being decoupled from its sovereignty and reattached to the portfolio performance of global superstates.
The Rise of the Triad
The conference tracks—”Trump 2.0,” “Eastward Bound,” and the “Middle East Rewired”—mirrored almost perfectly the dystopian Triad model that has been reported by independent journals. The “New World Order” celebrated at the Kempinski is not a world of free democracies, but a consolidated map of three totalitarian blocs: the American sphere, the Eurasian/Chinese sphere, and a managed vassalage in the Middle East.
The “Middle East Rewired” panel was not discussing abstract peace; they were discussing the IMEC Corridor. This US-brokered trade route requires a rail link from Saudi Arabia to Haifa—a link that global investors will not fund while Israel is “unstable.” Thus, the war must end not when security is achieved, but rather when the financing for the rail line is secured. We are being reduced from a sovereign state to a transit node for Indian goods headed to Europe.
When Discount Bank CEO Avi Levy and the assembled dignitaries spoke of “forces reshaping the global economic map,” they were acknowledging, with terrifying complacency, the end of the liberal international order. They were preparing the Israeli economy not to stand alone, but to serve as a high-tech vendor to these emerging superstates. The “Innovation Without Borders” slogan, sponsored by a relentless globalism, rings hollow when one realizes that for the average citizen, the borders are closing in. The elites in the room were effectively negotiating the terms of Israel’s tenancy in a world where it is no longer the landlord of its own fate.
The Great Betrayal
Perhaps the most stinging irony of the November 27 gathering was its timing. On the very day the financial aristocracy met to discuss “The Future of Finance” and “Resilience,” independent analysts were publishing scathing indictments of the “Great Betrayal” by the American Jewish majority. While the conference attendees feted the “Trump Economy 2.0” and “America First,” they ignored the crumbling “Blue Wall” of Diaspora support. The disconnect was palpable: a room full of people betting on a globalized future that has already decided to leave the Jewish people behind as a distinct political entity.
The branding on the flyer—”No.No.No.No.No.Yes”—conceived by creative director Gideon Amichay, was intended to symbolize innovative breakthrough melting resistance.
Watch Gideon Amichay explain his “No, No, No, No, No, Yes” philosophy
Amichay’s famous philosophy teaches that “No” is just a comma, a pause before the inevitable “Yes” of innovation. But when applied to national survival, this logic becomes lethal. The “No” of the soldier in Gaza—no to Hamas, no to surrender—is viewed by this conference as merely a “blocking position” in a negotiation. The “Yes” they are driving toward is not victory, but the “Yes” of a capitulation signed in ink by a Delaware corporation. It is the “Yes” of the court Jew who believes that if he makes himself useful enough to the Emperor, the decree will hopefully be annulled.
A Puzzle with Missing Pieces
As the conference wound down and the QR codes were scanned for “after the conference” networking, the golden puzzle on the poster remained unresolved. The pieces of this “New World Order” do not fit together for the benefit of the soldier in Gaza or the mother in Sderot. They fit together only for the multinational corporation that can straddle the divide between Washington, Riyadh, Beijing, and a “Post-War” Tehran.
The “Global Economy 2025” conference was not a celebration of Israeli ingenuity; it was a shiva call. It was the sound of a disconnect so profound that it borders on treason—a managerial class eager to dissolve the messy, difficult, miraculous reality of the Jewish State into the smooth, golden, interchangeable pieces of a global gameboard. They call it “inclusion.” History will likely call it liquidation.
PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s pardon power play: A not-so-veiled offer to Israel’s judiciary – analysis By YONAH JEREMY BOB
The prime minister’s pardon contained a not-so-veiled offer: Let me have a pardon and I will turn down the pressure on the legal establishment.
NOVEMBER 30, 2025 17:03 Jerusalem Post
There is no other way to see it: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request for a pardon mid-trial, blatantly inconsistent with Israeli law, is an attempt to bulldoze his way out of his public corruption trial.
In normal times, President Isaac Herzog would simply reject the request, since he does not have the authority to grant the pardon until a verdict is reached.
But these are not normal times.
After nearly five years of the trial only indirectly impacting Netanyahu, in recent months, he has been under fire during cross-examination, and legally speaking, it has been brutal.
Additionally, after years of failing to undermine Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, the prime minister has finally found a wedge issue to isolate her from the High Court of Justice: the scandal surrounding former IDF chief lawyer Yifat Tomer Yerushalmi, who resigned, and the question of who will probe that scandal, including any alleged side role of Baharav-Miara in the saga.
This is therefore a unique moment for Netanyahu.
Until now, he thought he could intimidate the state prosecution’s legalteam into a plea deal that would allow him to remain in office and without any jail time, simply by scoring points in the trial.
And he has scored many points.
Chances are, he will be acquitted of the worst charge of bribery in Case 4000, the Walla-Bezeq media bribery affair.
His defense team had blown several rage holes in that case, which requires proving different issues at once.
Judge Moshe Baram may even vote to acquit him in Cases 1000, the Illegal Gifts Affair, and 2000, and the Yediot Ahronot-Yisrael Hayom attempted media bribery affair.
Very likely Netanyahu will be convicted in case 1000
What has become clear during cross-examination, however, is that it is very likely that Netanyahu will be convicted by the other two judges in Case 1000 of breach of trust. The prime minister has not provided as strong a narrative as the prosecution’s multiple witnesses, and he admits most of the basic facts, challenging only whether his intent was criminal.
Further, he may be convicted in Case 4000 of the minor charge of breach of trust, which has a much lower standard of proof than bribery.
If he gets two convictions, even minor, a 2-1 majority of the panel may rule that he is banned from public office, and, theoretically, he could even get some amount of jail time.
That means that his chances of a plea deal from the state prosecution, just based on the progress at trial, have dropped considerably in recent months.
On the flip side, Netanyahu is in his strongest position, exerting pressure over the legal establishment more broadly.
The High Court just left Baharav-Miara out to dry in the grand legal battle over who will probe Tomer Yerushalmi’s case, giving the power over who chooses the prosecutor to her arch enemy and Netanyahu lieutenant, Justice Minister Yariv Levin.
She may dodge this bullet, and it may be a one-time exception, leaving her all of her authorities and her time in office set to run through early 2028.
On the other hand, that probe could unravel her authority further, if there is any evidence that she helped Tomer Yerushalmi cover up (no one has presented any evidence to support this to date) her own scandal, as opposed to just not realizing that the former IDF chief lawyer lied to everyone.
But whether she can dodge that bullet or not, the High Court choosing to distance itself from her request to keep the probe within the state prosecution was a fundamental turning point – and potentially even a break-up of sorts.
It was as if the High Court said: We want to be on your side, but you got tangled in something, and we need to save our own authority first.
All of this comes as Netanyahu and Levin have spent an extensive period delegitimizing High Court President Yitzhak Amit as they are trying to move forward with a potentially politicized government committee to probe October 7.
Netanyahu’s not-so-veiled offer suggests: “Let me have a pardon and I will turn down the pressure on the legal establishment.”
What exactly that would mean, whether firing or restraining Levin, restoring legitimacy to Amit, and suspending further judicial overhaul issues, or even agreeing to negotiate changes to overhaul issues that his government has already passed, is an interesting theoretical question.
Herzog will want to grant the pardon if he can find a legal way to do so. He has wanted to pardon Netanyahu and end the case for years.
Whether he will do so without approval from Baharav-Miara or the High Court is another open question.
There are also other scenarios where Baharav-Miara and the High Court negotiate indirectly with Netanyahu through Herzog to reach a plea deal, which allows for a pardon and resolves the judicial overhaul crisis.
Then again, Baharav-Miara may stick to her guns, and then Herzog would probably need to take a pass or risk approving the pardon, only to have it overturned by the High CourtOne way or another, Netanyahu has forced the issue, seeing this as both his weakest and strongest moment – and the consequences for the country now and deep into the future are practically beyond description.
November 30, 2025 Israel Realtime
▪️NAT. SEC. MINISTER ON PROPAGANDA VIDEO AND ACCUSED OFFICERS – “We need to put an end to this distorted procedure where when one of our fighters shoots a terrorist, he is immediately taken for interrogation. We need to stop this distorted procedure, we need to stop this approach, we are fighting enemies and murderers who want to rape women and burn babies.” As well as at the Knesset: “I will act to cancel automatic investigations after shooting at terrorists.”
.. The fighters were interrogated and released without conditions. Additionally, their weapons were not confiscated.
▪️POKEMON GO WEAPONS CACHE? – As part of the game Pokemon go, in which you have to reach physical locations in the real world to earn points, a boy climbed a cliff and located an enemy weapons cache near an IDF base. It is believed that a Bedouin squad stole the weapons from an IDF base and the cache could have been used as an active fighting position against the IDF within Israel, in seconds. (I24)
▪️TERROR – HARISH? A general alert of a possible terror incident in Harish overnight, security forces conducted extensive searches in the city area. No follow up report, so likely a criminal event.
▪️ISRAELI/JEWISH CULTURE CLASH – Yair Golan, leader of the party The Democrats, the merger of left wing Labor and extreme left wing Meretz, asked on N12 news: “So there is no need for Torah learners (Torah scholars)?” Answer: “There is no need for this (ein shum tzorech b’inyan ha’ze).”
🎗️QATAR ON GAZA PHASE 2 – ‘Israel must not interfere with the implementation of the Gaza agreement because of two fallen soldiers’, saying that Israel should ignore Hamas’s refusal to return the remaining 2 hostage bodies, daily attacks and infiltration attempts across the yellow line, and weekly sniper attacks against IDF positions.
.. Related: Two terrorists who emerged early this morning from the underground tunnels in Rafah were eliminated by our forces.
⭕ROCKET ALERT – GAZA AREA – KEREM SHALOM (aid transfer station) – at 3:18 AM. No report of if accurate or false alarm.
♦️SAMARIA – JENIN – (“Camp”) During searches of buildings designated for demolition, forces discovered an old explosives lab, ammunition, several explosives, and additional weapons intended for terror purposes.
.. TIMON and FARA – (Northern Samaria) Commando forces raided hundreds of targets in the villages of Timon and Fara. The forces located an operational observation command center, explosives, weapons, incitement materials, and support materials for the Hamas terrorist organization. Additionally, more than ten terrorists were arrested, including arms dealers.
♦️GAZA – IDF demolished significant infrastructure overnight in the Israeli controlled areas, explosions echoed throughout southern Israel.
🇱🇧LEBANON – FINAL WARNING? According to several Lebanese sources, American officials have sent clear messages to Lebanon, Israel is preparing to intensify attacks on Hezbollah (if they don’t immediately continue with disarming). With the Pope leaving Lebanon midweek, will Israel move to an intense combat phase?
🇮🇷IRAN ATTACKS? – Revolutionary Guards: ”The Iranian Air Force recently attacked bases loyal to Israel in the area in Iraq and attacked military positions of armed Kurdish militias carrying out operations for Israel.”
Reports from Ilam, western Iran, an Iranian ballistic missile has been launched in the direction of Iraqi Kurdistan (video of missile launch distributed on social media). It was reported that they are targeting entities that allegedly assisted Israel and the USA.
.. Iraq denies. Reuters: the launches were a test.
.. Al-Mayadeen Lebanese from sources in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards: Reports of missile launches tonight from Iran towards the Kurdistan region in Iraq are not true.
🇸🇾SYRIA – Analysis by The Arab Desk: The President of the United States can endorse in the White House the murderer in a suit, Jiuliani, but nothing can cover up his actions and those of the group of terrorists under his command who are as we speak slaughtering Alawites in northern Syria and on the coast at this very hour.
Syria is in chaos and will continue to be so for a long time. Don’t be fooled by the nonsense they feed you. The Syrian border today, as it was a year ago, is considered the most dangerous for Israel. The IDF captured the Syrian Golan Heights and is stationed at points where it needs to be.
Despite the new regime’s attempts to stabilize the situation, the opposite is happening. And why, you ask? Because Syria is torn in pieces, tribes, small terror groups, militias of all kinds control different areas. Rape, robbery, murders happen daily. All these human scum have hatred for Israel embedded in their DNA. In the end, everything converges around Israel.
All this “quiet” is a false quiet. The territorial control in Syria, like in Lebanon, is the only line of defense that can save us from future Oct. 7 like events, G-d forbid.
🌐 SPREAD the word about ISRAEL REALTIME, send your friend the link below…
👉 WhatsApp: tinyurl.com/IRWAC
👉 Telegram: tinyurl.com/3fz86npa
👉 Other links: IsraelRealTime.com
Comments
Comments are closed.