NEWS
[Ed.:
Swing-State Dem C-SPAN Caller Declares She’s DONE Voting for Democrats (VIDEO)
[Ed.:
Brazil Launches Online Platform to Track and Prosecute ‘Disrespectful’ Speech Frank Bergman
October 27, 2025
Brazil’s left-wing government has unveiled a sweeping new “anti-disinformation” online system that will track down dissenters and prosecute those caught using “disrespectful” speech.
Critics are calling the chilling new system, which is driven by artificial intelligence (AI), one of the most dangerous censorship tools in the Western Hemisphere.
The publicly funded project is designed to monitor, track, and criminally prosecute citizens who question radical ideology.
Branded the “Platform of Respect,” the initiative was launched by Brazil’s Ministry of Human Rights in partnership with the NGO Aliança Nacional LGBTI+.
It is funded with R$300,000 ($56K) in taxpayer money through a parliamentary amendment from Erika Hilton, a self-identified transgender politician.
The government claims the program will combat “disrespect,” “hate speech,” and “disinformation.”
But free speech advocates warn it is actually a direct attack on dissent.
The scheme creates a surveillance network that criminalizes speech and thought not aligned with state-sanctioned ideology.
Platform of Respect
At the center of the system is an artificial intelligence program named Aletheia.
According to its website, Aletheia is designed to “track the origin of disinformation, report its impact, and enable accountability for authors and disseminators.”
In practice, the AI is being used to flag citizens who allegedly “misgender” public figures or make statements contradicting gender ideology.
Such offenses can now lead to lengthy prison sentences under the socialist government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Tracking and Prosecuting Speech
According to reports, Aletheia doesn’t just monitor misinformation; it actively identifies individuals for potential prosecution.
One high-profile example cited by local media involves Isabella Cêpa, a feminist activist who was forced to flee Brazil and seek asylum in Europe after referring to Hilton as male.
For that remark, she faced up to 25 years in prison before ultimately being vindicated.
The groundwork for such prosecutions was laid in 2019, when Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court declared that “discrimination against LGBT individuals” was legally equivalent to racism, effectively making “transphobia” a criminal offense.
Since then, the law has been used to punish Brazilians for words and opinions, not actions, that contradict state-approved narratives.
During the September 16 launch event in Brasília, platform coordinator Jean Muksen described how the system functions as a 24/7 surveillance engine.
“We created a platform with several artificial intelligence tools that continuously monitor pages, profiles, websites, and blogs,” Muksen said.
Muksen added that the software interprets “nuances” such as irony and sarcasm.
Once flagged, the content is stored, reviewed by a lawyer hired by the NGO, and then forwarded to the courts for potential prosecution.
Government-Funded Ideological Policing
According to Gp1, the platform operates as both a “fact-checking” and enforcement mechanism, employing legal and communications experts for 18 months to identify “problematic” online behavior.
Muksen confirmed that Aletheia’s surveillance targets citizens, members of Congress, state legislators, journalists, influencers, and news outlets.
Anyone with a public platform who challenges official orthodoxy is a target.
The NGO’s permanent team, consisting of a coordinator, lawyer, journalist, and designer, maintains the system at an annual taxpayer-funded cost of R$140,000 ($26K).
Critics argue that this combination of AI surveillance, activist enforcement, and government funding has created a digital policing regime that blurs the line between justice and ideological control.
Speech as a Crime
Under Brazil’s expanding hate-speech laws, any statement suggesting that biological sex is immutable can now be classified as “discrimination” or “transphobia.”
Analysts warn that the Platform of Respect is not a defensive tool against misinformation; it is a weapon of state power built to erase opposition under the guise of tolerance.
By merging artificial intelligence with ideological enforcement, Brazil has developed a system that effectively turns private thought into a potential criminal act.
Many fear this high-tech model of censorship that could soon spread beyond its borders.
READ MORE – Expert Sounds Alarm as Global Push to Euthanize Children Intensifies
[Ed.:
JUST IN: FAA Issues Ground Delay for DFW Due to Staffing Issues Amid Schumer Shutdown
Chris Murphy Pressed on CNN Over Americans Going Hungry Because of Schumer’s Shutdown (Video)
Designed to scan/track foreign visitors at airports and other ports of entry, the system has an admitted 3% error rate that will capture the faces of millions US citizens without them ever knowing it.
OCT 27, 2025
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its final rule in the Federal Registry last week expanding the use of biometrics at the nation’s borders. In the process, the government formalized what had been years in the making: a full-scale biometric tracking system to photograph and monitor every non-citizen who enters or leaves the U.S. And it admits many citizens will get caught up in the dragnet, too.
If Joe Biden had implemented such an Orwellian system conservatives would be screaming from the rafters. As it stands, there’s nary a peep nor a squeak being heard from the right.
The measure takes effect December 26 and authorizes Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to photograph “all aliens” at all ports of entry and departure, and “any other point of departure,” according to the website Biometric Update.
Below is an excerpt from the article.
CBP and the Department of Homeland Security call it an “operational modernization.” Civil-liberties groups call it a sweeping expansion of government surveillance. Regardless of the label, it completes the long-delayed “biometric entry-exit” system Congress first ordered in 1996 and repeatedly demanded after September 11.
The new rule removes prior pilot limits and age exemptions, paving the way for a nationwide network of facial-recognition checkpoints at every border interface the agency controls.
Until now, CBP’s biometric operations have been patchwork. At airports, the agency’s “Simplified Arrival” program already photographs nearly every foreign traveler upon entry, comparing the live image against passport and visa databases.
But exits were another story. Land and sea departures were largely unmonitored, and air-exit facial scans existed only at a handful of airports. The new regulation ends that fragmentation, empowering CBP to photograph all non-citizens leaving the country as well.
By eliminating old limits such as a 15-airport cap and an age exemption for those under 14 and over 79, the new rule removes the last formal barriers to universal coverage. DHS says the expansion will strengthen border security, reduce visa overstays, and “close information gaps” in identifying those who enter and fail to leave when required.
In its public statements, DHS has emphasized efficiency, saying that “photographing travelers at entry and exit allows CBP to verify identities within seconds, reducing document fraud and streamlining inspections.”
Every image captured under the new system feeds CBP’s Traveler Verification Service (TVS), which is a massive cloud-based facial-recognition architecture that cross-checks live photos against government databases. When it verifies a traveler’s identity, it transmits the result to a CBP officer’s screen and stores the image and match data.
For non-citizens, those images can be retained for up to seventy-five years in DHS’s central biometric repository, the Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT).
The new rule states DHS “may require an alien to be photographed when departing the United States to determine the alien’s identity or for other lawful purposes.” The phrasing gives the government extraordinary latitude in deciding where and how photographs are taken.
In practice, cameras will capture faces wherever CBP has an operational presence at passport control booths, boarding gates, vehicle lanes, pedestrian crossings, cruise terminals, and even small private docks.
Officials have acknowledged that “a few travelers depart the country from locations that are not designated ports of entry,” such as private airfields and marinas. The rule now covers them too.
CBP says the intent is to close loopholes exploited by travelers who might otherwise exit without inspection, but the net result is an authority broad enough to extend biometric surveillance to almost any international departure site.
At airports, implementation will likely resemble what already exists in the Simplified Arrival program. Cameras installed at boarding gates automatically photograph every passenger as they approach the jet bridge. The image is transmitted to CBP’s verification service, matched to passport or visa records, and the traveler is cleared to board if the face and documents align.
The rule applies to “aliens,” but the cameras do not distinguish citizens from non-citizens in real time. At airports and land ports, shared cameras often photograph everyone passing through, citizens included.
CBP insists that citizen participation is voluntary and that its systems automatically delete citizen images within twelve hours once nationality is confirmed. The agency says it posts signage at every location informing citizens they may opt out and present their passport for manual verification instead.
A 2022 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report concluded that CBP’s privacy notices were inconsistent across airports and that airline contractors were often unsure how to process an opt-out. CBP’s own metrics suggest opt-outs are exceedingly rare: about 0.28 percent of air-exit travelers, 0.13 percent of air entrants, and 0.21 percent of pedestrians.
If the system misidentifies a citizen as a non-citizen – or fails to find a matching passport photo – the image can be retained longer than 12 hours. In its own testing, CBP reported false-non-match rates of up to 3 percent, translating into thousands of misclassified captures daily at full national scale.
Civil-liberties groups argue that even temporary retention undermines the promise of voluntariness.
Read the rest of the article at Biometric Update.
President Milei’s Party Wins Argentina Midterm Election in Landslide
Government Shutdown: SNAP Is Running Out of Money, Democrats Angry Illegal Aliens No Longer Qualify
BREAKING: Islamic Gangs TAKE OVER London – UK Police SURRENDER [26:56] Mahyar Tousi
October 26, 2025 Tousi TV
