NEWS
đš BREAKING: Tousi TV Reporter Taken To Hospital After Attack In London [41:20]  Mahyar Tousi
August 10, 2025Â Tousi TV
Iranâs Nuclear Deception: The World Must Stop Playing Along
Iranian President Pezeshkian: “We have no water. We are in a severe and unimaginable crisis.
August 10, 2025Â Jewish Breaking News
If anyone has a suggestion of what to do, they should come and tell us what actions to take.
Unfortunately, we have no choice but to cut off water.”
đșđž WHATSAPP GROUP đ https://chat.whatsapp.com/CSjlWV8UnNxHukfKTrUBcD
đźđ± TELEGRAM đ https://t.me/JewishBreakingNewsTelegram
đ„ WHATSAPP CHANNEL đ https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4EEJU7YSdAqzGs362F
New product called Savor is being marketed to restaurants, bakeries and food suppliers
AUG 10, 2025
We have an update in our ongoing coverage of the war on food.
A Bill Gates-backed startup is now producing butter with no animals, no plants, and no oils. Itâs made exclusively from carbon.
It is being praised because it uses zero greenhouse gases and less than one-thousandth of the water compared to traditional farm-based agriculture.
They create a wax-like substance by ultra-heating carbon in a factory and then selling it to consumers as so-called butter.
The Melian Refugee blog described is as follows: âThe idea that this is âhealing the planetâ compared to cows in a field eating grass is so comically evil and perverse that only Bill Gates could be behind it.â
Gates clings to his dream of destroying American agriculture and replacing it with factory food that he stands to profit from.
Watch him, below, in a promotional video singing the praises of fake butter, trying to cast it as just as good as real butter. Other than Gates, notice itâs all women being used to push this product. In the marketing and advertising world, women are seen as less threatening, more convincing and trustworthy.Â
Poor Bill. Heâs having to admit itâs âreally hardâ to put farmers out of business and convince people to eat his crappy non-food made in a lab. The dream is that you will buy all the lies from people like Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, Benjamin Netanyahu, etc., and start eating factory-made food that has no proven track record for human health. Lab-grown meat and fish have billions of dollars in venture capital backing, as the billionaires are betting big that real food will soon become more scarce, forcing people to look for more affordable alternatives.
If you buy it and consume it, you will become their human guinea pigs. What could possibly go wrong? Remember the Covid shots that Gates backed, saying they were safe and effective, when the dirty little secret was that we were the lab rats? Nearly five years later, people are still dying from that scheme, nobody has been held accountable, and the depopulationist elites are celebrating their accomplishments. I anticipate fake food bio-engineered in factories will deliver a similar âwinâ for the globalist elites. The joke is always on the little people.
It will be no different with fake buter. It may taste the same, but how will it affect your health over the long term?
The company, Savor, is working with restaurants, bakeries, and food suppliers to get their carbon-made butter onto the plates and into the bellies of Americans. By the end of the year you should start to see it showing up at your favorite grocery store, likely with very vague and deceptive labeling.
Another false solution to a false problem. I donât believe Iâll be buying or consuming any fake butter, whether it has the blessing of Gates or anyone else
Caught on Camera: Syrian Forces Execute Doctor in Hospital in Al Suwayda [48:30]  Mansur Ashkar
August 10, 2025
[Ed.:
Pelosi Is Just the Tip of the Democratsâ Insider Trading Iceberg
[Ed.: Tee-hee! What a coincidence!]
Sanctions of Tyrant Brazilian Justices Show Trump Is Wrestling Back Control of Western Hemisphere
[Ed.:
Nearly Half of Gen Z Say They Would Choose Financial Stability Over Love, Shocking Survey Reveals
[Ed.:
UN Admits 95% of its Gaza Aid Trucks Were âInterceptedâ Â BYÂ DANIEL GREENFIELD
After 5% success rate, UN demands another $265 million or everyone will starve.
AUG 9, 2025Â 3:00 PMÂ Â Jihad Watch – Over the past few weeks, the UN, the EU, the media and Hamas banded together to demand that aid deliveries shift back from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to the United Nations.
The campaign played out with Hamas kidnapping, torturing and killing employees of the U.S. aid group, while the media spread false claims that Israel was using GHF distribution sites as âdeath trapsâ for killing Gazans, and world leaders demanded that the UN be put back in charge of aid.
Back when the UN had been in charge it had faked its own famine by refusing to deliver food and letting it pile up instead. Since then the UNâs food aid has kept on piling up even while GHF, an American Christian aid group, has managed to deliver millions of meals to Gaza residents, despite being smeared by the media as âcontroversialâ for feeding those whom the UN wouldnât.
Whom was the UN actually delivering aid to back when it even bothered trying to deliver it?
The UNOPS âMechanism for Gazaâ revealed that of the around 2,600 aid trucks entering Gaza, only 300 made it to their destination. 2,310 trucks or 88% of them were âinterceptedâ.
Much of the âaidâ being brought in by the UN and its allies, including the UNâs WFP, UNICEF, the International Red Cross, the International Medical Corps and the World Central Kitchen, whose founder Jose Andres, has been constantly attacking Israel in the media, was âinterceptedâ.
Cindy McCainâs UN World Food Programme (WFP), which has been front and center in the media, crying for more money and denouncing Trump and Israel, only successfully delivered 1,864 pallets of aid since May while losing 29,673 pallets or 93% of it to âinterceptionsâ.
The UNâs WFP recently claimed that it has run out of food stocks and needs $265 million for just the next 6 months to feed Gaza. Where did its food stocks go? Certainly not to aid stations.
The WFPâs track record of successfully delivering pallets is 6%. Thatâs bad even for the UN. Who is all that aid going to? The UN, which is happy to break down everything by weight and pallet, is deliberately vague on the subject, saying only that it had been âintercepted either peacefully by hungry people or forcefully armed actors, during transit in Gazaâ.
Who might those âarmed actorsâ be? Alec Baldwin? Clint Eastwood? Hamas?
The UN, which condemns Israel every other day of the week, isnât talking, but what we know is its aid groups arenât actually delivering to any aid groups, theyâre âdeliveringâ them to âarmed actorsâ and those armed actors probably arenât members of the Academy of Motion Pictures.
And the UNâs deliberate ambiguity about how many trucks are being âpeacefullyâ intercepted and how many are being seized by âarmed actorsâ with green headbands is likely a deliberate attempt to obfuscate how many of its âaid trucksâ are being used to run supplies to Hamas.
In a recent press release, the UNâs WFP claimed that âa total of 1,833 trucks have been dispatched to reach starving civilians inside Gazaâ, it neglected to mention that only 140 of those trucks (currently estimated at 2095) or 5% of the trucks actually reached anyone.
Even assuming the best possible intentions by the WFP, why in the world would anyone hand the UN organization its requested quarter of a billion dollars for a 5% success ratio?
And thereâs no reason to assume any good intentions on the part of the UN or the WFP.
After years of doing this, even a bunch of rickshaw drivers could manage a better ratio than 95% enemy intercepts. Itâs hard to believe that the 5% deliveries to 95% interceptions ratio reflects anything other than extensive collaboration between the UNâs Gaza employees, many of whom are Hamas, and Hamas. The UNâs refusal to deliver much of the aid under its control reflects a deliberate effort to create shortages in order to put pressure on Israel and drive up the price for the aid that Hamas steals. Thereâs no famine in Gaza but there are artificial shortages being created by the UN-Hamas alliance meant to financially and politically benefit the terrorists.
The best evidence of it is that Hamas made the restoration of UN control over aid into Gaza one of its conditions for a deal. Why would an Islamic terrorist group care who distributes the aid?
After losing 95% of its aid trucks, you would think that the UN would turn to Israel to provide security, but unlike the Gaza Humanitarian foundation, the international aid groups have repeatedly rejected any Israeli military protection. Lately, UN officials have taken to complaining that their trucks are being looted because theyâre forced to use âunsecured routesâ.
But if they donât want Israel to secure those routes, who do they want securing the routes?
According to a New York Times story, âthe United Nations does not allow Israeli soldiers to protect aid convoys, fearing that would compromise its neutrality, and its officials have called on Israel to allow the Gaza police, which are under Hamasâs authority, to secure their convoys.â
Having Hamas escort its trucks doesnât compromise the UNâs neutrality, but having Israel does.
Last year, Farhan Haq, the Deputy Spokesman for the UN Secretary-General, in response to a question about Israel taking out the Hamas âGeneralâ in charge of the âGaza Policeâ, and âresponsible for securing the aid and the aid trucksâ admitted that âwe have contacts with everyone involved in the grounds who can play a role in making sure that trucks can travel safely through Gaza, and that includes people in the de facto authoritiesâ and vowed that âwe will continue our discussions with anyone on the de facto authorities who is capable of working with us to make sure that the flow of goods into Gaza continues.â âDe facto authoritiesâ are how nonprofit aid groups tend to refer to illegal Islamic terrorist groups. In this case, thatâs Hamas.
The AFP reported that âthe Gaza police â which includes many Hamas members â helped secure humanitarian convoysâ while NBC News claimed that âGazaâs police force was also more present and provided security, but months of Israeli bombing have crippled the police.â
The Biden administration, after falsely assuring Israel that Hamas would not intercept the aid, was not only aware that this was going on, but David Satterfield, Bidenâs âhumanitarianâ envoy, condemned Israel for taking out the Hamas âpoliceâ including, according to him, âa commander whose units had been involved in providing escortsâ, admitted that the Gaza âpoliceâ âcertainly include Hamas elementsâ but that âwith the departure of police escorts, it has been virtually impossible for the U.N. or anyone else⊠to safely move assistance in Gaza.â
With Hamas helping to âsecureâ aid trucks, itâs a mystery how so many of them disappear.
After an aid delivery success ratio in the single digits, the UN is terrible at delivering aid in Gaza, but itâs a stunning success when it comes to its political and economic support of Hamas.
[Ed.: Uh-huh! “Give us more money, or else everyone will starve!” Uh-huh.]
Iran Threatens to Murder 45 Anti-Regime Journalists and Their Families   BY HUGH FITZGERALD
AUG 9, 2025 4:00 PMÂ Jihad Watch
The Islamic Republic of Iran has just issued a warning to Iranian dissidents working for the London-based Iran International, which broadcasts into Iran true stories about the country that the regime doesnât want reported. Itâs a murder threat: stop your reporting on Iran, or you and your relatives will be killed. As Iranâs economy sinks, truthful reports on the situation, which the regime wants kept hidden, are being made available to Iranians on social media and increasing political discontent. Tehran has one way to shut down those reports: it threatens to kill 45 of the journalists who work for Iran International, and 300 of their family members as well. More on these threats can be found here: âIran threatens to execute 45 journalists, over 300 relatives in coordinated media suppresion [sic] effort,â Jerusalem Post, August 7, 2025:
The London-based media outlet Iran International has filed an urgent appeal to the United Nations, revealing that 45 of its journalists and more than 300 of their relatives across eight countries have received explicit death threats from Iranâs Intelligence Ministry.
The threats warn staff to stop reporting on Iran or face execution, including the execution of their immediate family members.
The Persian-language news network, headquartered in London with additional bureaus in Washington and other global locations, said the campaign is part of a coordinated effort by Iranian authorities to silence dissent and intimidate the press. The threats mark what Iran International calls an âalarming and unprecedented escalationâ in Tehranâs long-running campaign against the outlet.
While the Iranian government has for years tried to shut down as best it can Iran Internationalâs online reports, it has never before issued a threat of mass murder of its journalists. This is a new development, prompted by the collapse of Iranâs economy, which has made the grim reports from Iran International even more believable and effective.
In its formal appeal filed Tuesday with five UN special rapporteurs, Iran Internationalâs legal team outlined that the threats have come with specific deadlines, all of which expired last week. The letter was sent to UN experts on freedom of expression, extrajudicial executions, torture, counterterrorism, and Iran.
No other totalitarian state has used the threat of mass murder of journalists, wherever they may be located around the world, in order to shut down truthful news about that state. Iran has gone beyond the Nazis and the Communists both in the geographic scope of its threats against journalists around the world, and in the size of the group being threatened â 45 journalists and 300 of their relatives.
The countries where these journalists are located include not only the U.K., where Iran Internationalâs headquarters are located, but also the USA, Canada, Sweden, Germany, Turkey, and Belgium.
What should the Western world now do? All of the countries where Iran International journalists now live and are threatened should collectively charge Iran with threatening mass murder of those journalists, in the hope that the UN itself will urge the imposition of economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic, such as a call for countries to halt their buying of Iranian oil and natural gas. Iranâs own news outlets can be targeted for cyberattacks. Sanctions can be placed on Iranian officials, including freezing their assets abroad, and denying them visas to travel to other countries. These sanctions should remain in place until Iran withdraws the threats it has made to the employees of Iran International. And, of course, the Western countries could provide Iran International with much greater financial support so it can expand the numbers of its personnel and increase its online operations. Thatâs the best way to answer Iranâs threat.
Russians Warn ‘Titanic Efforts’ Are Underway to Disrupt the Trump-Putin Meeting in Alaska
Texas Democrats Are Raging Over GOP GerrymanderingâBut They Did It First
[Ed.:Â ‘What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!’]Â
Trump Vows That DC Will Soon Be One of America’s ‘Safest Cities’
